Duck Astrovirus

Overview and Taxonomy of Duck Astrovirus

Introduction to Duck Astrovirus

Duck astrovirus (DAstV) represents a significant and rapidly diversifying group of non-enveloped, positive-sense, single-stranded RNA viruses belonging to the family Astroviridae, genus Avastrovirus. These pathogens have emerged as formidable threats to global waterfowl production, causing a spectrum of clinical manifestations ranging from viral hepatitis and enteritis to severe visceral gout and nephritis, resulting in substantial economic losses across Asia, Africa, and beyond [1-3]. The first recognized duck astrovirus, DAstV-1, was originally associated with duck viral hepatitis (DVH) in the United Kingdom and subsequently identified in commercial duck flocks in China beginning in 2008 [6, 11, 24]. However, the landscape of duck astrovirus diversity has expanded dramatically over the past two decades, with molecular surveillance revealing at least five distinct genetic lineages circulating in domestic duck populations, alongside numerous spillover events from goose astroviruses (GAstV) [5, 12, 19]. The International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses (ICTV) currently recognizes multiple avastrovirus species, but the rapid emergence of novel genotypes, recombination events, and cross-species transmission has complicated the taxonomic framework and necessitates continuous revision [5, 30].

Taxonomic Position Within the Astroviridae Family

Duck astroviruses are classified within the genus Avastrovirus, one of two genera comprising the Astroviridae family, the other being Mamastrovirus which infects mammalian hosts [24, 30]. The genus Avastrovirus is further subdivided into three officially recognized species: Avastrovirus 1 (encompassing turkey astrovirus type 1, TAstV-1), Avastrovirus 2 (encompassing avian nephritis virus, ANV), and Avastrovirus 3 (encompassing duck astrovirus type 1, DAstV-1; turkey astrovirus type 2, TAstV-2; and chicken astrovirus, CAstV) [24]. However, this classification system has been repeatedly challenged by the discovery of genetically divergent duck and goose astroviruses that do not neatly fit into these established categories. Genomic analyses demonstrate that duck astroviruses exhibit remarkable genetic heterogeneity, with nucleotide identities across the complete genome often falling below 60% when compared to other avastroviruses [5, 20]. The emergence of novel genotypes, such as DAstV-5 identified in 2021 from gout-affected ducklings in Guangdong Province, China, has prompted calls for revision of the taxonomic criteria to accommodate these divergent lineages [5].

The genetic classification of duck astroviruses has historically relied on pairwise sequence comparisons of the complete genome and individual open reading frames (ORFs), particularly the capsid protein-encoding ORF2 [5, 16]. According to the ICTV species demarcation criteria for avastroviruses, distinct species are defined by amino acid identities in the capsid protein below 80% and genetic distances (p-distances) exceeding 0.314 based on the complete ORF2 gene [5]. By these metrics, the DAstV-5 JM strain, with capsid amino acid identities not exceeding 60% compared to other avastroviruses and genetic distances of 0.596–0.695, clearly represents a novel species within the genus Avastrovirus [5]. Similarly, goose astroviruses that have spilled over into duck populations, such as GAstV-2 strains causing fatal gout in ducklings, often cluster as distinct genogroups that challenge the traditional host-based classification [12, 19, 37].

Genomic Organization and Genetic Diversity

The duck astrovirus genome is typically 7.0–7.7 kb in length and contains three primary open reading frames: ORF1a, ORF1b, and ORF2, flanked by 5' and 3' untranslated regions [5, 20]. ORF1a encodes the non-structural protease and other replication-associated proteins, ORF1b encodes the RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp), and ORF2 encodes the capsid precursor protein that is ultimately cleaved into the structural proteins forming the viral particle [24, 28]. Comparative genomic analyses across duck astrovirus genotypes have revealed that ORF1b is the most conserved region, while ORF2 exhibits the highest degree of genetic diversity, particularly in the spike domain that mediates host cell attachment and antibody neutralization [5, 10, 17]. This hypervariability in the capsid protein underpins the serotypic diversity observed among duck astroviruses and complicates diagnostic detection and vaccine development [10, 14, 16].

The genetic diversity of duck astroviruses is driven by two primary mechanisms: the error-prone nature of the RdRp, which lacks proofreading activity, and high-frequency recombination events [26, 30]. The estimated nucleotide substitution rate for avian astroviruses is approximately 1.46 × 10⁻³ substitutions per site per year based on ORF2 sequences, which is consistent with other RNA viruses [32]. Recombination events, particularly within the ORF1a and ORF2 regions, have been documented in both duck and goose astroviruses, contributing to the rapid emergence of novel genotypes and facilitating cross-species transmission [26, 30, 36]. Recent molecular epidemiological studies from China have identified multiple recombination breakpoints in circulating GoAstV strains, suggesting that these events are not rare evolutionary accidents but rather ongoing processes that shape the genetic landscape of waterfowl astroviruses [26].

Classification of Duck Astrovirus Types

The classification of duck astroviruses has evolved considerably since the initial recognition of DAstV-1 and DAstV-2. Currently, at least five distinct duck astrovirus genotypes are recognized, though the nomenclature remains inconsistent across the literature.

DAstV-1 represents the prototypical duck astrovirus, originally isolated from ducklings with viral hepatitis and historically referred to as duck hepatitis virus type 2 (DHV-2) or duck hepatitis virus type 3 (DHV-3) in older classification systems [9, 24, 35]. DAstV-1 strains exhibit nucleotide homologies of 91.6%–98.7% among themselves and are primarily associated with hepatitis, liver necrosis, enlargement, and hemorrhage in ducklings under one month of age [6, 11]. Experimental infections with contemporary DAstV-1 isolates, such as DAstV-SDWF and DAstV-SDZZ, have successfully reproduced clinical DVH in specific-pathogen-free (SPF) ducks, confirming their etiological role [6, 11]. The DAstV-1 genome typically measures approximately 7.8 kb and encodes a capsid protein that harbors type-specific linear B-cell epitopes, such as the ⁴⁵⁴STTESA⁴⁵⁹ motif identified by monoclonal antibody 3D2, which shows no cross-reactivity with other DAstV serotypes [10]. DAstV-1 has been documented in duck populations across China, the United Kingdom, and potentially Egypt, with phylogenetic analyses indicating transboundary transmission linkages [1, 6, 11].

DAstV-2 was identified from ducks with enteric disease and has been classified within Avastrovirus genogroup II [8, 24]. However, DAstV-2 remains poorly characterized compared to other genotypes, with limited genomic data and experimental infection studies available. Some phylogenetic studies have demonstrated that GAstV group II strains cluster with DAstV-2 and TAstV-2, suggesting potential evolutionary relationships and shared ancestry [17].

DAstV-3 (historically referred to as duck hepatitis virus type 3 or DHV-3) represents a distinct genotype that can cause hepatitis and nephritis in ducklings [2, 7]. The complete genome of the DAstV-3 CPH strain shares 98.3% nucleotide identity with the novel TA422 strain isolated from weak duck embryos, confirming genotype stability despite geographic separation [2]. DAstV-3 infections are frequently reported in co-infection scenarios, particularly with duck hepatitis A virus type 1 (DHAV-1) and type 3 (DHAV-3), complicating clinical diagnosis due to overlapping clinical signs [1, 7, 14]. The development of multiplex quantitative PCR assays targeting conserved regions of the ORF1b gene has enabled rapid differential detection of DAstV-3 alongside other waterfowl astroviruses [7, 15].

DAstV-4 is a recently recognized genotype that has been detected primarily through metagenomic and molecular surveillance studies in China [15-17]. DAstV-4 shares close phylogenetic relationships with GAstV group I strains, and some researchers have proposed that GAstV-I may actually represent duck-origin astroviruses that have adapted to geese, rather than true goose-specific viruses [12, 17]. The ORF2 gene of DAstV-4 is targeted in multiplex diagnostic assays designed to differentiate among the four major waterfowl astrovirus types circulating in Chinese duck and goose populations [15].

DAstV-5 represents the most recently described duck astrovirus genotype, first identified in March 2021 from 5-day-old Beijing ducks on a commercial farm in Guangdong Province, China, presenting with fatal visceral urate deposition [5]. The DAstV-5 JM strain exhibits profound genetic divergence from all previously described avastroviruses, sharing only 15–45% genome sequence identity with other avastroviruses and capsid amino acid identities not exceeding 60% [5]. Based on the genetic distance criteria established by the ICTV, DAstV-5 unequivocally represents a novel avastrovirus species, and its discovery underscores the vast, unexplored genetic diversity within waterfowl astrovirus populations [5]. Subsequent studies have detected DAstV-5 co-infections with DHAV-3 in Egyptian ducklings, suggesting a wider geographic distribution than initially appreciated and highlighting the role of migratory birds or international trade in viral dissemination [1].

Cross-Species Transmission and Host Range

One of the most alarming features of duck astrovirus epidemiology is the capacity for cross-species transmission. Numerous studies have documented the spillover of goose astroviruses into duck populations and vice versa, blurring the traditional host-species boundaries [12, 13, 18, 19, 32]. The first reported outbreak of novel goose astrovirus in Cherry Valley ducklings occurred in Shandong Province, China, in March 2019, where the SDXT strain caused visceral gout with a mortality rate of 30% [19]. Similarly, the GAstV strain HNNY0620 was isolated from Muscovy ducklings in Henan Province in June 2020, causing mortality rates of up to 61% [18]. These events are not isolated; rather, they represent a broader trend of host range expansion facilitated by viral genetic plasticity, recombination, and possibly the intensification of waterfowl farming practices that bring different avian species into close contact [12, 13, 30].

Experimental infection studies have confirmed that DAstV-1 can produce clinical symptoms in SPF chickens, marking the first demonstration of DAstV cross-species transmission to gallinaceous poultry [3]. Likewise, goose astrovirus GAstV-2 isolates have been shown to cause visceral gout in experimentally infected chickens, indicating that these viruses possess the molecular machinery necessary to overcome species barriers [32]. The molecular determinants of cross-species transmission likely reside in the capsid spike domain, which mediates receptor binding and host cell entry [5, 10, 17]. Comparative sequence analyses have identified distinct amino acid signatures in the ORF2 proteins of duck-origin and goose-origin strains that may correlate with host specificity, though definitive receptor identification remains an active area of investigation [13, 18, 29].

From an epidemiological perspective, the cross-species transmission of duck and goose astroviruses has profound implications for disease surveillance and control. The World Organisation for Animal Health (WOAH) recognizes the economic significance of astrovirus infections in poultry, and the expanding host range of these viruses complicates biosecurity measures [25, 27]. The detection of duck-origin astrovirus strains in partridges further extends the potential host range, suggesting that wild birds and gamefowl may serve as reservoirs or bridging hosts for viral introduction into commercial flocks [2].

Epidemiological Context and Global Distribution

Duck astrovirus infections have been reported across major duck-producing regions, with China serving as both the epicenter of genetic diversity and the primary source of epidemiological data [2, 3, 5, 16, 22]. Surveillance studies from 13 provinces in China have documented positive rates of waterfowl astrovirus ranging from 16.8% to 44.4% depending on the region, sampling strategy, and diagnostic methods employed [2, 22]. In Southeast China, a large-scale survey of 5,203 swab and liver samples from 11 Muscovy duck farms revealed that 26.06% of samples tested positive for DAstV, with DAstV-1 identified as the predominant pathogenic type [3]. These high prevalence rates, coupled with frequent co-infections with other hepatotropic viruses such as DHAV-1, DHAV-3, and fowl adenoviruses, create diagnostic challenges and may exacerbate disease severity through synergistic pathogenic mechanisms [1, 7, 14, 23].

The emergence of novel duck astrovirus genotypes in Egypt, confirmed through metagenomic next-generation sequencing, demonstrates that these viruses are not limited to Asian waterfowl populations [1]. The Egyptian DAstV-5 strain and DHAV-3 co-infections highlight the transboundary spread of these pathogens, likely facilitated by international trade in live poultry, hatching eggs, or contaminated poultry products [1]. Furthermore, the detection of astroviruses in wild passerine birds, such as the black-naped monarch in Cambodia, suggests that wild avian populations may act as reservoirs or vectors for avastrovirus dissemination, potentially introducing novel genotypes into domestic duck flocks [21].

The epidemiological patterns of duck astrovirus are further complicated by age-dependent susceptibility. Experimental infections using the DAstV-1-GDB-2022 strain have demonstrated that ducklings aged 21–28 days exhibit significantly higher pathogenicity, with severe liver and kidney enlargement, hemorrhage, and mortality, compared to ducklings infected at 1 or 14 days of age [4]. This age-related susceptibility has important implications for vaccination strategies and farm management practices, as it suggests that older ducklings may require enhanced protection even if they have survived early-life exposure [4, 34]. Similarly, vertical transmission has been confirmed for both duck and goose astroviruses, with viral RNA detected in vitelline membranes, embryos, allantoic fluid, and hatched goslings following experimental infection of breeding flocks, indicating that vertical routes contribute to the persistence and dissemination of these viruses in production systems [2, 31, 33].

Molecular Characterization and Genomic Diversity of Duck Astrovirus

The molecular characterization of duck astrovirus (DAstV) has undergone a paradigm shift over the past decade, transitioning from a simplistic classification of two serotypes to a complex, multi-genotype taxonomy that reflects extraordinary genomic plasticity. This section provides an exhaustive analysis of the genomic architecture, phylogenetic relationships, recombination dynamics, and evolutionary pressures that define the DAstV genetic landscape, drawing upon the most recent metagenomic surveillance data and complete genome sequencing efforts from across China and Egypt.

Genomic Organization and Structural Features

The DAstV genome, characteristic of the Astroviridae family, comprises a single-stranded, positive-sense RNA molecule typically ranging from 7,200 to 7,700 nucleotides in length. The genome is organized into three primary open reading frames (ORFs): ORF1a and ORF1b, which encode the nonstructural polyproteins involved in viral replication and proteolytic processing, and ORF2, which encodes the capsid precursor protein responsible for antigenicity, host receptor binding, and virion assembly. The complete genome of the DAstV-5 JM strain, identified from Beijing ducklings suffering from visceral gout in Guangdong province, China, was determined to be 7,252 nucleotides in length, exhibiting genome sequence identities of only 15–45% with other avastroviruses [5]. This profound genetic divergence underscores the remarkable diversity within the genus Avastrovirus.

The ORF1a and ORF1b regions contain conserved motifs including a serine protease domain and an RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp), respectively. The ribosomal frameshift mechanism between ORF1a and ORF1b, mediated by a heptameric slippery sequence and a downstream RNA pseudoknot, is a hallmark of astrovirus replication strategy. For the novel DAstV-3 strain TA422, full-genome sequencing revealed 98.3% nucleotide identity with the CPH reference strain, yet the isolate demonstrated distinct biological properties including vertical transmission capability [2]. This highlights that even minor genomic variations can translate into significant phenotypic differences in transmission dynamics and pathogenicity.

Phylogenetic Classification and Genotypic Diversity

Phylogenetic analyses based on complete genome sequences and individual ORFs have consistently demonstrated that DAstVs cluster within the Avastrovirus genus, forming distinct genogroups that correlate with host species and disease manifestations. The traditional classification recognized DAstV-1 and DAstV-2 as the primary duck-origin astroviruses, associated with duck viral hepatitis (DVH) and enteric infections, respectively [24]. However, the emergence of novel genotypes has necessitated a revised taxonomic framework. The identification of DAstV-3, DAstV-4, and most recently DAstV-5 has expanded the known genetic diversity of duck astroviruses to at least five distinct genotypes [5, 15, 16].

The DAstV-5 JM strain represents a particularly striking example of genomic novelty. Amino acid identity comparisons with other avastroviruses revealed values not exceeding 59% for ORF1a, 79% for ORF1b, and 60% for ORF2 [5]. Critically, the capsid region of JM exhibited genetic distances of 0.596 to 0.695 from the three official avastrovirus species, strongly suggesting that JM qualifies as a novel genotype species within the Avastrovirus genus according to International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses (ICTV) criteria [5]. This discovery has profound implications for diagnostic assay design and vaccine development, as existing molecular tools may fail to detect such divergent strains.

The genetic diversity of DAstV-1 isolates circulating in China has been extensively characterized. Eleven DAstV-1 strains isolated from Muscovy duck farms across five provinces in Southeast China exhibited nucleotide homologies of 90.4%–99.99% and amino acid homologies of 94%–99.8% with the DAstV-1 reference strain [3]. This relatively high conservation within the DAstV-1 genotype contrasts sharply with the inter-genotype diversity observed between DAstV-1 and DAstV-5, which share only 15.4%–75% homology [3]. Such findings indicate that while individual genotypes may be relatively stable, the genus as a whole is undergoing rapid diversification, likely driven by host adaptation and ecological niche expansion.

Recombination as a Driver of Genomic Diversity

Recombination is a major evolutionary force shaping astrovirus genomes, and DAstVs are no exception. The error-prone nature of the RdRp, combined with the high frequency of co-infections in commercial duck flocks, creates favorable conditions for recombination events. Evidence of natural recombination has been documented in goose astrovirus (GAstV) populations, with most recombination breakpoints occurring within the GAstV-2 subgenotype II-c strains [26]. Given the close phylogenetic relationship and frequent cross-species transmission between duck and goose astroviruses, recombination likely plays an equally significant role in DAstV evolution.

The potential for recombination is exacerbated by the high prevalence of mixed infections. Surveillance data from China revealed that co-infections with multiple waterfowl astroviruses are common, with four species of astrovirus detected across 13 provinces [22]. The simultaneous detection of DAstV-3, DAstV-4, GoAstV-1, and GoAstV-2 in the same geographic regions creates ample opportunity for template switching during viral replication [15]. Furthermore, the first identification of concurrent infections with DAstV-5 and duck hepatitis A virus type 3 (DHAV-3) in Egyptian ducklings using metagenomic next-generation sequencing (m-NGS) demonstrates that co-infection is not limited to astrovirus-astrovirus interactions but extends to inter-genus combinations [1]. Such mixed infections provide the genetic substrate for recombination events that can generate chimeric viruses with altered host range, tissue tropism, or pathogenicity.

Cross-Species Transmission and Host Range Expansion

The molecular characterization of DAstVs has increasingly revealed evidence of cross-species transmission, blurring the traditional boundaries between duck, goose, and chicken astroviruses. The isolation of a duck-origin goose astrovirus (AstV-SDTA strain) from diseased ducklings in Shandong province, China, demonstrated that GAstV can infect and cause disease in ducks [12]. Phylogenetic analysis placed AstV-SDTA within the novel GAstV branch, with nucleotide homology of 97.2–98.8% to other GAstV strains, confirming that this virus is essentially a goose astrovirus that has crossed the species barrier to ducks [12]. Similarly, the HNNY0620 strain, isolated from Muscovy ducklings with visceral gout in Henan province, clustered within the GoAstV-I clade based on ORF1a and ORF2 amino acid sequences [18]. These findings indicate that the host range of GAstV is expanding, posing a significant threat to duck populations.

The molecular basis for cross-species transmission likely resides in the capsid protein, which mediates host cell attachment and entry. Comparative analysis of the ORF2 sequences from duck-origin GAstVs revealed specific amino acid mutations that may facilitate adaptation to duck hosts. The HNNY0620 strain harbored unique mutations in ORF1a (700 I/T), ORF1b (288 F/L), and ORF2 (306 A/T) that were not present in goose-origin GAstV strains [18]. These mutations may alter capsid surface topology, enabling interaction with duck-specific cellular receptors. Furthermore, the DAstV-1-GDB-2022 strain was shown to cause clinical symptoms in 28-day-old specific-pathogen-free (SPF) chickens, marking the first documented occurrence of DAstV-1-induced disease in chickens [3]. This cross-species infectivity has significant implications for poultry biosecurity, as chickens and ducks are often raised in close proximity on mixed-species farms.

Evolutionary Rates and Phylogeographic Dynamics

Molecular clock analyses have provided insights into the temporal dynamics of DAstV evolution. Bayesian inference analyses based on ORF2 sequences estimated a nucleotide substitution rate of 1.46 × 10⁻³ substitutions/site/year for avian astroviruses, with the time to the most recent common ancestor of GAstVs estimated to be around 2011 [32]. This substitution rate is consistent with other RNA viruses and indicates that DAstVs are undergoing continuous, rapid evolution. The emergence of novel genotypes such as DAstV-5 likely reflects this ongoing evolutionary process, with the JM strain representing a lineage that has diverged substantially from previously characterized viruses.

Phylogeographic analysis of GAstV, which is closely related to DAstV, has revealed the complexity of viral dispersal patterns in China. Based on 90 reported cases from 13 provinces, the initial introduction of GAstV was traced to Hunan Province, followed by nationwide dissemination that correlates with the live gosling trade [17]. Henan, Anhui, and Jiangsu provinces have been particularly heavily impacted [17]. For DAstVs, phylogenetic analysis of strains from Egypt and China has revealed cross-border transmission links, with Egyptian DHAV-3 and DAstV-5 strains clustering with Asian strains [1]. This suggests that international trade in live ducks or duck products may facilitate the global spread of DAstV genotypes, underscoring the need for coordinated international surveillance efforts.

Molecular Determinants of Pathogenicity

The molecular characterization of DAstV genomes has begun to identify specific genetic determinants associated with pathogenicity. The capsid protein, encoded by ORF2, is the primary target for neutralizing antibodies and contains hypervariable regions that likely influence virulence. For GAstV-2, two major mutation sites at amino acid positions 456 (E/D) and 540 (L/Q) in the capsid protein were found to correlate with distinct subgroups [17]. The 540Q mutation in the HLJ2021 strain was shown to affect protein structure, potentially altering receptor binding affinity and contributing to the high mortality rate of 83.3% observed in experimentally infected goslings [29].

In DAstV-1, a highly conserved linear B-cell epitope (⁴⁵⁴STTESA⁴⁵⁹) was identified in the ORF2 protein using monoclonal antibody 3D2 [10]. This epitope is type-specific and shows no cross-reactivity with other DAstV serotypes, making it a valuable target for serologic diagnosis [10]. The identification of such epitopes provides a molecular basis for understanding antigenic variation among DAstV genotypes and informs the design of subunit vaccines.

The nonstructural proteins also contribute to pathogenicity. Adenosine deaminase (ADA), an enzyme involved in purine metabolism and uricogenesis, was shown to be upregulated during GAstV-II infection and to directly interact with the viral capsid protein, particularly its C-terminal domain [38]. This interaction enhances viral replication, suggesting that DAstVs may manipulate host metabolic pathways to create a favorable environment for replication. Similarly, goose IFIT5, an interferon-induced protein, was found to positively regulate GAstV replication, with the virus promoting its own replication by upregulating gIFIT5 expression [39]. These host-virus interactions represent potential targets for antiviral intervention.

Diagnostic Implications of Genomic Diversity

The extensive genomic diversity of DAstVs poses significant challenges for molecular diagnostics. The development of a quadruplex fluorescence quantitative RT-PCR method targeting the ORF1b gene of DAstV-3, GoAstV-1, and GoAstV-2, and the ORF2 gene of DAstV-4, achieved detection limits of 1 × 10¹ copies/μL for DAstV-4, GoAstV-1, and GoAstV-2, and 1 × 10² copies/μL for DAstV-3 [15]. However, the genetic divergence of DAstV-5, which shares only 15–45% genome sequence identity with other avastroviruses, means that existing diagnostic assays may fail to detect this emerging genotype [5]. This highlights the need for broad-spectrum or degenerate primer-based approaches that can accommodate the full range of DAstV genetic diversity.

Metagenomic next-generation sequencing (m-NGS) has emerged as a powerful tool for detecting novel and divergent DAstV strains. The first complete genome sequencing of a DHAV-3 strain from Egypt, along with the simultaneous discovery of a novel DAstV-5 co-infection, was achieved using m-NGS [1]. This unbiased approach enables the detection of viruses that would be missed by targeted PCR assays, making it an essential component of surveillance programs aimed at monitoring DAstV diversity and emergence.

Molecular Pathogenesis and Host Immune Response

The molecular pathogenesis of Duck Astrovirus (DAstV) and its closely related counterparts, Goose Astrovirus (GAstV) and other waterfowl astroviruses, represents a complex interplay between viral replication strategies, host cell hijacking, and dysregulated immune responses. Understanding these mechanisms at the molecular level is critical for elucidating why these infections result in divergent clinical outcomes, ranging from acute hepatitis and nephritis to visceral gout and enteric disease. Recent advances in reverse genetics, transcriptomics, and functional genomics have begun to unravel the specific viral proteins and host pathways that govern pathogenesis, revealing a virus that exploits host metabolic and antiviral machinery to its own advantage.

Viral Entry, Capsid Processing, and Cellular Tropism

The initial stages of DAstV infection are dictated by the structural biology of the capsid. The open reading frame 2 (ORF2) encodes the capsid precursor protein, which undergoes essential proteolytic maturation to yield the infectious virion. While studies on classical human astroviruses have demonstrated that extracellular trypsin cleavage is required for infectivity, research on waterfowl astroviruses suggests a more complex intracellular processing pathway. Drawing from structural insights into related astroviruses, the capsid spike domain, formed from the C-terminal region of the processed ORF2 protein, is the principal mediator of host cell attachment [41, 43]. The spike domain contains a receptor-binding domain (RBD) that engages specific, yet poorly characterized, host cell surface receptors. In the context of duck astrovirus, immunofluorescence and immunohistochemical studies using rabbit anti-DAstV antibodies have revealed robust positive signals in the liver and kidney, correlating directly with the severity of macroscopic and microscopic lesions [4]. This indicates a pronounced tropism for hepatocytes and renal tubular epithelial cells, a finding consistently supported by viral load quantification showing the highest copy numbers in these organs [4, 42].

The mechanism of cellular entry likely involves clathrin-mediated endocytosis, a pathway common to many non-enveloped viruses. Once internalized, the viral genome is released into the cytoplasm, where translation of the positive-sense RNA genome initiates. The capsid protein itself may play additional roles beyond entry. For instance, the goose astrovirus Cap protein has been shown to directly interact with host adenosine deaminase (ADA), specifically via its C-terminal domain, suggesting a post-entry function in modulating the intracellular environment [38]. This interaction is not merely passive; it exemplifies how the virus commandeers host proteins to establish a favorable replication niche.

Hijacking Host Metabolism: The Role of Adenosine Deaminase and Purine Dysregulation

One of the most intriguing aspects of DAstV and GAstV pathogenesis is the consistent link between infection and severe hyperuricemia, leading to visceral gout. The molecular underpinnings of this phenomenon are being progressively uncovered, with adenosine deaminase (ADA) emerging as a central node. ADA is a key enzyme in purine metabolism, catalyzing the irreversible deamination of adenosine to inosine, a critical step in the uric acid production pathway. Experimental infection of goose embryo fibroblasts (GEFs) with GAstV genotype II (GAstV-II) significantly upregulates the expression of goose ADA (gADA), without altering its subcellular distribution, which remains evenly dispersed in the cytoplasm and nucleus [38].

Critically, the functional relationship is bidirectional and proviral. Ectopic overexpression of gADA dramatically enhances viral capsid protein expression and increases viral RNA loads, while siRNA-mediated knockdown of gADA exerts a potent antiviral effect, significantly suppressing virus replication [38]. This suggests that DAstV/GAstV has evolved to actively promote gADA expression and activity to support its own replication cycle. The direct physical interaction between the viral capsid protein and gADA, particularly the C-terminal domain of the capsid, provides a mechanistic basis for this enhancement. This interaction may stabilize gADA, increase its enzymatic turnover, or recruit it to sites of viral replication to locally modulate nucleotide pools. The downstream consequence is a surge in uric acid production, which, when overwhelmed in young ducklings with immature renal clearance, precipitates as monosodium urate crystals in joints and visceral organs, manifesting as gout [25, 27, 29]. This represents a unique form of pathogenesis where a metabolic enzyme directly co-opted by the virus drives a hallmark pathological feature of the disease.

Subversion of the Innate Immune Response: The IFIT5 Paradox

The host innate immune system, particularly the type I interferon (IFN-I) axis, represents the first line of defense against viral infection. However, DAstV and related viruses have evolved sophisticated strategies to not only evade but also exploit these antiviral mechanisms. A prime example is the role of Interferon-Induced Protein with Tetratricopeptide Repeats 5 (IFIT5), the sole member of the IFIT family in birds. IFIT proteins are canonically known as potent antiviral effectors, inhibiting viral translation and replication by binding to foreign RNA.

In stark contrast to this paradigm, goose IFIT5 (gIFIT5) acts as a proviral factor during GAstV infection. GAstV infection strongly induces gIFIT5 expression at both the mRNA and protein levels, peaking at 12 hours post-infection [39]. When gIFIT5 is overexpressed, GAstV replication is significantly enhanced, resulting in higher virus titers and increased capsid protein production. Conversely, silencing gIFIT5 restricts viral replication [39]. This startling reversal of function suggests that GAstV has adapted to use gIFIT5 as a decoy or a scaffold to facilitate its own replication. The mechanism may involve IFIT5 sequestering antiviral effectors or stabilizing viral RNA, effectively turning a sentinel of the host defense into a collaborator. This "parasitic" subversion of the interferon response is a hallmark of highly evolved viruses and highlights the complexity of the host-pathogen arms race in waterfowl.

Beyond IFIT5, the pro-viral role of ADA also intersects with immune modulation. The upregulation of ADA and the subsequent increase in uric acid can have immunomodulatory effects. Uric acid is a well-known danger-associated molecular pattern (DAMP) that can activate the NLRP3 inflammasome, leading to the production of IL-1β and IL-18. While this can drive inflammation, it may also contribute to the systemic inflammatory response and tissue damage observed in severe infections [2, 4]. The resulting "cytokine storm" can paradoxically enhance vascular permeability and facilitate viral dissemination, while the metabolic drain of purine dysregulation impairs the host's ability to mount an effective adaptive response.

Humoral Immunity and B-Cell Epitopes

The humoral immune response, centered on antibody production against the capsid protein, is crucial for controlling infection. The ORF2 capsid protein is the primary antigenic target, and the majority of neutralizing antibodies are directed against the hypervariable spike domain. A significant breakthrough in understanding the molecular basis of serotype-specific immunity was the identification of a conserved linear B-cell epitope on the DAstV-1 ORF2 protein. Using a monoclonal antibody (mAb 3D2), the minimal epitope was mapped to the amino acid sequence ⁴⁵⁴STTESA⁴⁵⁹ [10]. This epitope is highly conserved among all DAstV-1 strains tested but is absent in other serotypes (DAstV-2, DAstV-3, etc.), confirming its type-specificity.

Intriguingly, mAb 3D2 showed no neutralizing activity against DAstV-1, despite binding robustly to the native virion [10]. This indicates that the 454STTESA459 epitope is located in a region of the capsid that is not directly involved in receptor attachment or entry. This could be an internal region of the capsid spike or a surface loop that is sterically inaccessible for neutralization. The identification of such non-neutralizing, yet highly specific, epitopes is critical for developing differential diagnostic serological assays. In contrast, neutralizing antibodies likely target conformational epitopes on the spike surface, as has been demonstrated in human astroviruses where neutralizing mAbs block virus attachment by binding to distinct structural sites [43]. The development of trivalent IgY preparations targeting DHAV-1, DHAV-3, and DAstV-1 highlights the importance of a robust humoral response, achieving complete prophylactic protection in duckling challenge models and significant therapeutic efficacy [14]. This passive immunity strategy bypasses the need for the host's own nascent B-cell response during the critical early days of life.

Age-Dependent Susceptibility and Pathogenesis

A defining characteristic of DAstV pathogenesis is its stark age dependence. Experimental infections with the DAstV-1-GDB-2022 strain demonstrate that ducklings aged 21–28 days exhibit the highest pathogenicity, with severe liver and kidney enlargement, hemorrhaging, and mortality, while 1- and 14-day-old ducklings show markedly milder symptoms [4]. This pattern is mirrored in goose astrovirus infections, where goslings infected at 1–15 days of age suffer severe visceral gout and high mortality, whereas those infected at 25–35 days show only mild symptoms [34].

The molecular basis for this age-dependent susceptibility is multifactorial. First, the immune system of newly hatched ducklings is functionally immature. The interferon response is blunted, and the capacity for rapid clonal expansion of B and T cells is limited. This creates a permissive environment for rapid viral replication in the liver and kidney. Second, the developmental status of the kidneys plays a critical role. Young ducklings have a higher basal rate of purine metabolism and a less efficient renal excretory system. When DAstV infection upregulates ADA and drives uric acid production [38], the immature kidneys are unable to clear the excess, leading to rapid crystallization and gout. In older birds, more robust renal function and a more mature, regulated immune response can control both viral replication and metabolic byproducts, preventing the most severe outcomes. Finally, age-dependent differences in receptor expression on hepatocytes and renal cells may influence viral entry efficiency. The highest viral loads are consistently found in the kidney and liver, with the copy number in the kidney being the highest detected [42], and this tropism is consistent across all age groups, though the consequences are magnified in the very young.

Vertical Transmission and Systemic Dissemination

The molecular pathogenesis of DAstV is further complicated by its ability to establish vertical transmission. Experimental evidence in geese has demonstrated that the novel goose astrovirus can be transmitted from breeding flocks to their progeny. After inoculation of breeder geese, viral RNA was detected in the vitelline membrane, embryos, and allantoic fluid, with the ORF2 gene from these compartments sharing nearly 100% nucleotide homology with the virus isolated from the maternal ovary [33]. This confirms that the virus can traverse the follicular barrier and contaminate the developing oocyte.

This mode of transmission has profound implications for pathogenesis. Infections acquired vertically result in the virus being present at the earliest stages of development, before the immune system is fully formed. This explains the high mortality observed in goslings and ducklings within the first week of life [2, 22]. The virus is not confined to the gastrointestinal tract; it is a systemic pathogen. Following infection, viral genomic RNA is detected in the blood, cloacal swabs, and all representative tissues, including the heart, spleen, liver, and kidney [42]. This systemic spread is facilitated by the initial replication in the liver, a central metabolic and immune organ. The high viral burden in the liver leads to enzymatic disruption (e.g., elevated liver enzymes) and coagulative necrosis. Viral progeny then disseminate via the bloodstream to the kidney, where the interaction with ADA triggers the hyperuricemic crisis. The spleen, a key secondary lymphoid organ, also harbors high viral loads [4], suggesting that the virus may directly infect immune cells, contributing to the observed immunosuppression and prolonged viral shedding for up to 21 days post-infection [4]. The ability to infect and replicate in peripheral immune organs, including the bursa of Fabricius and thymus, has been confirmed in studies using a rescued DAstV-1 strain, further emphasizing the virus’s capacity to dismantle the adaptive immune response [40].

Epidemiology, Transmission Dynamics, and Cross-Species Spread

The epidemiological landscape of duck astrovirus (DAstV) and its closely related waterfowl astrovirus counterparts has undergone a profound transformation over the past decade, shifting from a sporadic, regionally confined pathogen to a widespread, economically devastating agent with a complex transmission ecology. The emergence of novel genotypes, the documentation of vertical transmission, and the accumulating evidence for cross-species transmission events have collectively redefined our understanding of how these viruses persist, spread, and evolve within and between avian populations. This section provides an exhaustive examination of the epidemiological patterns, transmission mechanisms, and host-range dynamics that characterize duck astrovirus infections, drawing upon surveillance data, experimental infection studies, and genomic epidemiological analyses from across the globe.

Global and Regional Prevalence and Genetic Diversity

The most intensive epidemiological surveillance for duck astroviruses has been conducted in China, where the rapid intensification of waterfowl production has created ecological conditions permissive for viral emergence and dissemination. Large-scale cross-sectional surveys have revealed substantial infection burdens across multiple provinces. One comprehensive investigation of 5,203 swab and liver samples collected from 11 Muscovy duck farms across five Chinese provinces yielded an overall DAstV positivity rate of 26.06% (1,356/5,203), with DAstV type 1 (DAstV-1) identified as the predominant circulating serotype [3]. In a separate study spanning 13 provinces, 260 of 1,546 waterfowl samples (16.8%) tested positive for one or more of the four newly recognized waterfowl astrovirus types (DAstV-3, DAstV-4, GoAstV-1, and GoAstV-2), with the highest detection rates observed in samples collected from farms and slaughterhouses compared to live poultry markets and backyard flocks [22]. This pattern suggests that intensive production systems, with their high host densities and continuous introduction of susceptible animals, serve as amplification hubs for astrovirus transmission.

The genetic diversity of circulating strains is remarkable and continues to expand. At least five distinct duck astrovirus genotypes (DAstV-1 through DAstV-5) have been characterized, alongside multiple goose astrovirus (GAstV) genotypes that frequently spill over into duck populations [5, 17, 26]. Phylogenetic analyses have demonstrated that Chinese GAstV strains form two major genotypic clusters, GAstV-I and GAstV-II, with GAstV-II further subdivided into multiple subgenotypes (II-a, II-b, and II-c). Notably, GAstV-II subgenotype II-c has emerged as the dominant lineage circulating in Shandong province and across the nation, suggesting a selective advantage in transmission or immune evasion [26]. The emergence of DAstV-5, first identified in 2021 from Beijing ducklings suffering from visceral gout in Guangdong province, further illustrates the ongoing genotypic diversification. DAstV-5 shares only 15–45% genome sequence identity with other avastroviruses, with capsid protein amino acid identities not exceeding 60% relative to established avastrovirus species, leading to its classification as a putative novel genotype species within the Avastrovirus genus [5]. The simultaneous detection of co-infections, such as the first documented case of DAstV-5 co-infecting with duck hepatitis A virus type 3 (DHAV-3) in Egyptian ducklings [1], adds another layer of epidemiological complexity, as co-infected birds may exhibit altered transmission dynamics, increased pathogenicity, or enhanced viral shedding.

Transmission Dynamics and Age-Related Susceptibility

The transmission of duck astroviruses occurs through multiple routes, including horizontal fecal-oral transmission, vertical (egg-transmitted) transmission, and potentially environmental persistence. The fecal-oral route is considered the primary mechanism for horizontal spread, consistent with the enteric tropism of astroviruses and the high viral loads detected in gastrointestinal tissues and fecal material. Experimentally infected ducklings shed viral RNA continuously for at least 21 days post-infection (dpi), irrespective of age at infection [4]. This prolonged shedding period, combined with the high environmental stability of non-enveloped astrovirus particles, facilitates efficient transmission within densely populated flocks and contributes to the maintenance of infection cycles across successive production batches.

Age-related susceptibility is a critical determinant of transmission dynamics and disease outcome. Controlled experimental infections using the DAstV-1-GDB-2022 strain in ducks aged 1, 7, 14, 21, and 28 days revealed a paradoxical pattern: ducklings aged 21 to 28 days exhibited the most severe clinical signs, including pronounced liver and kidney enlargement, hemorrhage, and mortality, whereas birds infected at 1 and 14 days of age displayed milder symptoms [4]. This contrasts with the pattern observed in goose astrovirus infections, where younger goslings (1–15 days of age) are highly susceptible to severe disease and mortality, while birds infected at 25–35 days of age develop only mild clinical signs [34]. These findings underscore that age-dependent susceptibility is both virus- and host-specific, with implications for vaccination strategies and biosecurity timing. In both duck and goose astrovirus infections, viral RNA is detectable in a wide range of tissues, including liver, kidney, spleen, heart, and intestine, indicating systemic dissemination following primary enteric replication, with the liver and kidney harboring the highest viral loads [4, 34, 42].

Vertical transmission represents a particularly insidious mechanism for viral perpetuation, as it allows the virus to bypass neonatal biosecurity measures and infect progeny before exposure to the external environment. Definitive evidence for vertical transmission of goose astrovirus was obtained through experimental infection of breeding geese, followed by detection of viral RNA in vitelline membranes, embryos, allantoic fluid, and hatched goslings. Crucially, the ORF2 gene sequences derived from these different compartments were virtually identical (>99.9% nucleotide identity) to the virus isolated from the ovary of the hen that produced the infected eggs, confirming direct vertical transfer [33]. Similarly, a novel DAstV-3 strain (TA422) was isolated from weak duck embryos, and experimental infection of 9-day-old specific-pathogen-free (SPF) duck embryos resulted in hemorrhaging, urate deposition, growth retardation, and malformations, with hatched ducklings exhibiting prolonged viral shedding, findings consistent with vertical transmission [2]. The detection of GAstV in goose embryos from hatcheries with elevated hatch failure rates further substantiates the role of vertical transmission in the epidemiology of these viruses [31]. These observations have profound implications for control programs, as they suggest that eradication from a production system may require replacement of breeding stock and rigorous testing of hatching eggs.

Cross-Species Transmission and Host Range Expansion

One of the most epidemiologically significant aspects of duck astrovirus biology is the accumulating evidence for cross-species transmission, challenging the long-held assumption that astroviruses are strictly host-specific. Initially, astrovirus infections were thought to be largely restricted to their species of origin, DAstV in ducks, GAstV in geese, turkey astrovirus (TAstV) in turkeys, and chicken astrovirus (CAstV) in chickens. However, a growing body of experimental and field-based evidence demonstrates that these barriers are permeable, with potentially serious consequences for disease emergence in naive populations.

The cross-species transmission of goose astrovirus to ducks is now well documented. In 2019, a highly acute disease characterized by visceral gout emerged in Cherry Valley ducklings in Shandong province, with mortality rates reaching 30%. The causative agent was identified as a novel goose astrovirus (strain SDXT), phylogenetically clustered within the Avastrovirus 3 species, providing the first clear evidence that GAstV could cause clinical disease in ducks [19]. Subsequent outbreaks in Muscovy ducklings in Henan province in 2020, with mortality rates as high as 61%, were also attributed to GAstV (strain HNNY0620) [18]. Metagenomic surveillance conducted in Guangdong province between 2023 and 2024 detected GAstV in 43.65% of duck liver samples collected from farms reporting emaciation, paralysis, and mortality. The recovered strain, GD2406, exhibited 98.3% nucleotide identity with the duck-origin GAstV strains HNNY0620 and SDTA, confirming that GAstV has become established in duck populations in multiple provinces [13]. The reverse transmission, duck astrovirus infection of geese, has also been documented, with DAstV-1 and DAstV-4 detected in goose clinical samples [22]. These bidirectional transmission events between ducks and geese indicate that waterfowl astroviruses are not rigidly host-restricted and that shared aquatic habitats, common rearing facilities, and live bird market networks facilitate interspecific viral exchange.

Perhaps even more alarming is the evidence that waterfowl astroviruses can infect galliform species. Experimental infection of 28-day-old specific-pathogen-free (SPF) chickens with the DAstV-1-GDB-2022 strain resulted in the first documented clinical disease, including liver enlargement, hemorrhage, and liver function disruption, in chickens infected with a duck-origin astrovirus [3]. In a separate study, a gout-associated goose astrovirus (GoAstV) was successfully isolated in the DF-1 chicken fibroblast cell line, and experimental inoculation of chickens produced clinical visceral gout, definitively demonstrating the ability of GoAstV to cross the species barrier into chickens [32]. Furthermore, large-scale surveillance of poultry in China detected goose astrovirus RNA in partridges, broadening the known host range to include additional game bird species [2]. These findings raise concerns that waterfowl astroviruses could spill over into commercial broiler and layer flocks, where they might cause novel disease syndromes or exacerbate existing enteric and renal disorders. The potential for such spillover events is amplified by the practice of mixed-species farming and the presence of waterfowl near chicken operations in many regions of Asia.

The mechanisms underlying cross-species transmission are likely multifactorial, involving both viral genetic determinants and host factors. The high mutation rate of astrovirus RNA-dependent RNA polymerase, estimated at approximately 1.46 × 10⁻³ substitutions per site per year for the ORF2 gene of avian astroviruses [32], generates extensive genetic diversity that can facilitate adaptation to new hosts. Recombination events, frequently detected in circulating GAstV strains, can introduce novel capsid sequences that may alter receptor-binding specificity and host tropism [26, 29, 30]. Specific amino acid mutations in the ORF2-encoded capsid protein, the primary determinant of host cell attachment and immune recognition, have been associated with host range expansion. For example, the goose astrovirus strain GD2406, which caused severe disease in Muscovy ducks, harbors 13 amino acid mutations in ORF2 compared to reference goose strains, and these mutations are hypothesized to contribute to its enhanced pathogenicity in ducks [13]. Similarly, the GAstV strain HNNY0620, which caused lethal gout in ducklings, contains unique ORF1a (700 I/T), ORF1b (288 F/L), and ORF2 (306 A/T) mutations not present in goose-adapted strains, suggesting that adaptive evolution occurred during or after the host switch [18].

From a global perspective, the epidemiological situation extends beyond China. The detection of DAstV-5 co-infecting with DHAV-3 in Egyptian ducklings, with phylogenetic evidence linking Egyptian strains to Asian lineages, indicates that duck astroviruses have a wider geographic distribution than previously recognized and that international trade in live birds or contaminated poultry products may facilitate transcontinental viral dispersal [1]. While the World Organisation for Animal Health (WOAH) does not currently list duck astrovirus as a notifiable disease, the economic impact, estimated in the hundreds of millions of dollars annually due to mortality, growth retardation, and reduced feed conversion, has prompted calls for enhanced surveillance and reporting frameworks. The Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) has emphasized the need for integrated surveillance of emerging poultry diseases in Asia, where the confluence of high-density production, limited biosecurity, and diverse host species creates conditions conducive to viral emergence. As the epidemiological and evolutionary dynamics of duck astroviruses continue to unfold, the capacity for cross-species transmission and the potential for further host range expansion will remain critical areas of investigation for both veterinary public health and agricultural sustainability.

Clinical Manifestations and Pathological Lesions in Ducklings

The clinical and pathological landscape of duck astrovirus (DAstV) infections in ducklings is remarkably complex, reflecting the genetic diversity of the etiological agents involved and the profound influence of host age at the time of infection. Far from presenting as a single, uniform disease, DAstV infections in ducklings manifest across a spectrum that ranges from acute, fatal hepatitis to a chronic, debilitating visceral gout syndrome, with significant overlap and co-infection scenarios further complicating the clinical picture [1, 7]. Understanding this spectrum is paramount for accurate diagnosis, effective biosecurity, and the development of targeted control strategies. The disease expression is largely dictated by the specific viral genotype, with DAstV-1 typically driving hepatotropic pathology, while DAstV-5 and certain goose-origin astroviruses (GAstV) induce nephropathogenic gout, and by the ontogenic status of the duckling’s immune and metabolic systems [2, 4, 5].

Acute Hepatitis Syndrome: The DAstV-1 Paradigm

The most historically recognized manifestation of duck astrovirus infection is acute viral hepatitis, primarily associated with DAstV-1 [6, 9, 10]. Ducklings, particularly those under four weeks of age, are exquisitely susceptible to this rapidly fatal disease. The incubation period is remarkably short, often mere hours to days post-exposure. Clinically, affected ducklings initially present with profound depression, anorexia, and lethargy. A characteristic opisthotonos, a spasmodic backward arching of the neck, is a classic agonal sign, often observed just moments before death. Morbidity and mortality can approach 100% in naive, unvaccinated flocks, representing a catastrophic economic threat to producers [3, 6]. Experimental reproduction of this syndrome using the DAstV-1-GDB-2022 strain in 28-day-old SPF ducks faithfully recapitulates natural disease, with primary clinical signs including marked liver enlargement and severe hemorrhaging [3]. This confirms the direct etiological role of the virus in inducing acute hepatic failure. The rapid onset and high lethality underscore the virus’s ability to overwhelm the innate immune defenses of the young duckling [4].

Gross Pathological Lesions of Hepatitis: On necropsy, the liver is the epicenter of pathological change. It is typically enlarged, friable, and exhibits a mottled appearance due to diffuse, often massive, hemorrhages that can be either petechial or ecchymotic [3, 4, 6]. The classic description is of a "paintbrush" or "stippled" hemorrhage pattern across the hepatic surface. The gallbladder is often distended with bile. The spleen may be enlarged and dark, and the kidneys can appear swollen and congested, though these changes are secondary to the primary hepatic insult. The hallmark of DAstV-1 infection is the absence of urate deposition, which distinguishes it from the gout-causing genotypes [6, 11].

Histopathological Findings: Microscopic examination of the liver reveals severe, diffuse hepatocellular necrosis and degeneration. Affected hepatocytes show vacuolation, loss of architecture, and the presence of eosinophilic intracytoplasmic inclusion bodies in some cases. There is extensive hemorrhage within the hepatic parenchyma, disrupting the sinusoids. A pronounced inflammatory response, characterized by infiltration of heterophils and lymphocytes, is evident primarily in the periportal regions. Bile duct hyperplasia is a common sequela in surviving birds, indicating attempts at hepatic regeneration [3, 6]. The severity of these microscopic lesions correlates directly with the clinical symptom severity observed at the macroscopic level [4].

Visceral Gout and Nephritis: The Emerging Nephropathogenic Phenotype

In stark contrast to the hemorrhagic hepatitis of DAstV-1, a second, more recently emerged clinical manifestation is characterized by widespread visceral gout. This syndrome is primarily caused by the novel DAstV-5 genotype and, notably, by the cross-species transmission of goose astrovirus into ducklings [5, 12, 18, 19]. This gout phenotype represents a profound derangement in uric acid metabolism and renal function. Ducklings as young as 5 days old can be affected, presenting with a highly acute disease. Mortality rates are substantial, ranging from 30% to over 60% depending on the viral strain and age of the host [5, 18, 19]. Clinical signs are initially non-specific, depression, ruffled feathers, anorexia, but rapidly progress to emaciation and paralysis, particularly of the legs, which may relate to urate deposition in joints and spinal nerves [13, 25].

Gross Pathological Lesions of Gout: The pathognomonic finding is the deposition of white, chalky urate crystals on the surface of, and within, multiple visceral organs, a condition known as visceral gout. The kidneys are the primary target and are invariably affected. They are typically swollen, pale, or mottled with a marbled appearance, and urate crystals are often visible within the parenchyma and dilated ureters [2, 5, 19, 29]. The deposition is not limited to the kidneys; a fine, frost-like layer of urates can coat the heart, liver, spleen, and the serosal surfaces of the intestinal tract. In severe cases, urate "tophi" can be found within the joint spaces, contributing to lameness [25, 44]. The liver, while often also affected, does not show the same hemorrhagic pattern as in DAstV-1 infection, but rather may be pale, swollen, and covered with urates [12].

Histopathological Findings: The histopathological picture is dominated by severe, necrotizing nephritis. In the kidney, there is widespread degeneration and necrosis of the renal tubular epithelium. The tubular lumina are frequently obstructed by urate crystals, giving rise to a characteristic "toothpaste" or radial appearance of crystalline material. This tubular obstruction leads to secondary dilation of the collecting ducts and proximal tubules. A chronic inflammatory response, consisting primarily of lymphocytes, macrophages, and occasional multinucleated giant cells, surrounds these urate deposits. The interstitium is expanded by fibrosis and edema [2, 25, 29]. In the liver, while less severe than the renal pathology, there is evidence of mild to moderate fatty degeneration, periportal lymphocytic infiltration, and scattered necrotic hepatocytes, but a marked absence of the hemorrhagic necrosis seen in DAstV-1 hepatitis [2, 42]. This suggests that the primary pathogenic mechanism is renal failure leading to hyperuricemia, with hepatic lesions being a secondary, extra-renal manifestation.

Age-Dependent Susceptibility and Virus Dissemination

A critical determinant of clinical outcome is the age of the duckling at the time of infection. Experimental studies using the DAstV-1-GDB-2022 strain have systematically demonstrated that pathogenicity is not uniform across age groups. Ducklings aged 21 to 28 days are far more susceptible to severe disease, exhibiting pronounced liver and kidney enlargement, severe bleeding, and mortality, compared to younger ducklings aged 1 and 14 days, which often display only mild symptoms [4]. This age-related resistance in very young ducklings may be due to residual maternal antibody interference with viral replication, or an incomplete development of the metabolic pathways that contribute to the severe inflammatory response seen in older birds.

Regardless of age, DAstV exhibits a wide tissue tropism. Following infection, viral RNA can be detected in almost all tissues, but replication is highest in the liver and kidneys [4, 42]. Immunohistochemical staining using rabbit anti-DAstV antibodies confirms robust positive signals in these organs, correlating directly with the severity of clinical symptoms [4]. This systemic spread is accompanied by prolonged viral shedding. Viral RNA is detectable in cloacal swabs and throat swabs for a remarkably extended period, up to 21 days post-infection in ducklings and up to 20 days in goslings, indicating a sustained ability to transmit virus to naive contacts and contaminate the environment [4, 42]. This prolonged shedding is a major challenge for disease control and flock eradication, as recovered birds may act as subclinical carriers.

Co-infections and Differential Diagnosis

The clinical picture is further complicated by the high frequency of co-infections. DAstV is frequently found alongside other hepatotropic viruses, most notably Duck Hepatitis A Virus (DHAV). Metagenomic sequencing has identified concurrent infections of novel DAstV with DHAV-3 in ducklings, which may synergistically enhance disease severity, making clinical differentiation based on signs alone impossible [1, 7]. Furthermore, a single flock may host multiple astrovirus genotypes, and waterfowl can be infected with goose astrovirus, which causes identical clinical signs of gout [13, 22]. The diagnostic challenge is underscored by the overlapping clinical signs of enteritis, hepatitis, and gout caused by DAstV-3, DAstV-4, GAstV-1, and GAstV-2, which require sophisticated molecular tools like multiplex qPCR for accurate typing [15]. The World Organisation for Animal Health (WOAH) recognizes duck viral hepatitis as a listed disease, and accurate diagnosis is critical for international trade. The clinical and pathological description provided here serves as the essential baseline for field surveillance, but confirmatory laboratory testing is mandatory to differentiate DAstV infection from other causes of hepatitis and nephritis in ducklings.

Diagnostics, Detection Methods, and Surveillance Strategies

The accurate and timely identification of duck astrovirus (DAstV) infections is paramount for implementing effective control measures, understanding viral epidemiology, and mitigating the substantial economic losses inflicted upon the global waterfowl industry. The diagnostic landscape for DAstV has evolved considerably, transitioning from classical virological techniques to a sophisticated array of molecular, serological, and advanced genomic tools. This section provides an exhaustive analysis of the current diagnostics, detection methods, and surveillance strategies employed for DAstV, drawing upon the most recent research to delineate their principles, applications, limitations, and future directions. The inherent genetic diversity of DAstV, encompassing multiple genotypes (DAstV-1 through -5) and its propensity for co-infection with other hepatotropic viruses such as duck hepatitis A virus (DHAV), necessitates a multi-faceted diagnostic approach [1, 5, 7, 35].

Molecular Detection Methods: The Cornerstone of Modern Diagnostics

Molecular techniques, particularly nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs), have become the gold standard for DAstV detection due to their unparalleled sensitivity, specificity, and rapid turnaround time. These methods are indispensable for confirming clinical cases, conducting epidemiological surveys, and differentiating between closely related viral strains.

Real-Time Quantitative PCR (qPCR) and Multiplex Assays

The development of real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR) assays has revolutionized the detection and quantification of DAstV. These assays offer significant advantages over conventional PCR, including the ability to quantify viral load, monitor viral shedding kinetics, and reduce the risk of cross-contamination. A foundational advancement was the establishment of a SYBR Green I-based duplex qPCR for the simultaneous detection of DHAV-1 and DAstV-3 [7]. This method, targeting conserved gene regions, demonstrated high specificity with no cross-reactivity against other common duck viruses and achieved detection limits of 7.34 × 10¹ copies/µL for DHAV-1 and 3.78 × 10¹ copies/µL for DAstV-3. Its application to clinical samples revealed a co-infection rate of 2.94%, underscoring the critical need for differential diagnostics in cases of duck viral hepatitis (DVH) [7]. This approach is particularly valuable given the overlapping clinical presentations of hepatitis caused by DHAV and DAstV, which can confound diagnosis based solely on clinical signs and gross pathology [7, 35].

Building on this concept, the need to monitor a broader spectrum of emerging waterfowl astroviruses led to the creation of a quadruplex fluorescence quantitative RT-PCR method [15]. This sophisticated assay was designed to simultaneously detect and differentiate four key waterfowl astroviruses: DAstV-3, DAstV-4, Goose astrovirus 1 (GoAstV-1), and GoAstV-2. By designing specific primers and TaqMan probes targeting highly conserved regions of the ORF1b gene (for DAstV-3, GoAstV-1, GoAstV-2) and the ORF2 gene (for DAstV-4), this method achieved a detection limit of 1 × 10¹ copies/µL for DAstV-4, GoAstV-1, and GoAstV-2, and 1 × 10² copies/µL for DAstV-3 [15]. The assay exhibited excellent specificity, no cross-reactivity with other pathogens, and robust reproducibility, making it a powerful tool for high-throughput surveillance and differential diagnosis in regions where multiple astrovirus genotypes co-circulate [15, 22]. The application of this quadruplex method to 269 field samples confirmed its clinical utility and accuracy when validated against genome sequencing [15].

Further expanding the multiplexing capability, a one-step multiplex real-time fluorescence quantitative reverse transcription PCR (qRT-PCR) was developed to simultaneously detect four major waterfowl viruses: Duck Tembusu virus (DTMUV), duck hepatitis virus (DHV), Muscovy duck reovirus (MDRV), and Muscovy duck parvovirus (MDPV) [50]. While not specific to DAstV, this assay is critically relevant as it provides a comprehensive screening tool for differential diagnosis in ducks presenting with non-specific clinical signs. The assay demonstrated a limit of detection (LOD) of 27 copies/μL for all four targets and showed no cross-reactivity with DAstV or other common avian pathogens, highlighting its specificity and utility in ruling out other viral etiologies [50]. The development of such broad-spectrum multiplex assays is essential for efficient and cost-effective surveillance, particularly in resource-limited settings.

Isothermal Amplification Technologies: Advancing Point-of-Care Diagnostics

While qPCR remains the laboratory standard, its reliance on expensive thermal cyclers and technical expertise limits its deployment for on-farm or field-based diagnostics. Isothermal amplification technologies, which operate at a constant temperature, offer a compelling alternative for rapid, point-of-care (POC) testing. Among these, multienzyme isothermal rapid amplification (MIRA) has emerged as a promising platform. MIRA assays have been successfully developed for detecting other duck pathogens, such as duck enteritis virus (DEV) and fowl adenovirus serotype 4, demonstrating their adaptability and potential for DAstV detection [47, 49]. The MIRA platform offers three formats: basic MIRA (agarose gel detection), MIRA-qPCR (real-time fluorescence), and MIRA-lateral flow dipstick (MIRA-LFD) for visual readout [47]. The MIRA-LFD format is particularly advantageous for field use as it requires no specialized instrumentation, with results visible to the naked eye within 20 minutes at a constant temperature of 35-36°C [47, 49]. The sensitivity of these assays is comparable to qPCR, with LODs reaching 1 × 10¹ copies/μL [47]. The application of a similar MIRA-based approach for DAstV would represent a significant step forward in enabling rapid, on-site diagnosis, facilitating immediate biosecurity interventions.

Another isothermal method, reverse transcription recombinase-aided amplification (RT-RAA), has been specifically validated for the detection of goose astrovirus (GoAstV), a virus closely related to DAstV [52]. This real-time fluorescence-based assay achieved detection within 26 minutes at a constant 39°C, with a detection threshold of 1.19 × 10² copies per μL [52]. The assay demonstrated 100% specificity, showing no cross-reactivity with other common goose viruses, and its clinical performance on 40 samples showed 100% agreement with pre-existing data [52]. The rapidity and simplicity of RT-RAA make it an ideal candidate for POC detection of astroviruses in waterfowl, potentially allowing for the timely implementation of quarantine measures and targeted therapeutic interventions.

Conventional and Nested PCR

Despite the ascendancy of real-time methods, conventional and nested PCR assays remain valuable tools, particularly for initial screening, genotyping, and amplicon sequencing. A semi-nested PCR approach was employed in a large-scale epidemiological study screening 5,203 samples from 11 Muscovy duck farms across five Chinese provinces, yielding a DAstV-positive rate of 26.06% [3]. This method proved effective for detecting DAstV-1 and facilitated the subsequent isolation and whole-genome sequencing of 11 viral strains [3]. Similarly, a multiplex PCR method has been developed for the simultaneous detection of goose parvovirus (GPV), GoAstV-1, and GoAstV-2, with specific bands at 315 bp, 609 bp, and 1,405 bp, respectively [48]. This assay showed no cross-amplification with other common goose pathogens and achieved an LOD of 1 × 10³ copies/μL for single targets [48]. While less sensitive than qPCR, these conventional methods are cost-effective and accessible for many diagnostic laboratories, serving as a reliable backbone for routine surveillance.

Serological and Immunological Detection Methods

Serological assays provide critical information on host immune responses, past exposure, and vaccine efficacy. They are complementary to molecular methods, which detect active infection.

Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) and Antibody-Based Detection

The development of robust ELISA systems is crucial for large-scale serosurveillance. An indirect ELISA was established to detect antibodies against DAstV, utilizing the prokaryotically expressed spike protein of the virus [46]. This assay was instrumental in evaluating the antibody titers of egg yolk immunoglobulin (IgY) produced in immunized hens, demonstrating titers up to 1:1024 [46]. This platform is not only useful for monitoring humoral immunity in vaccinated flocks but also for assessing natural infection rates in a population. Furthermore, the production of trivalent IgY targeting DHAV-1, DHAV-3, and DAstV-1 represents a significant advancement in both passive immunotherapy and diagnostics [14]. The IgY preparation exhibited a potent in vitro neutralization index and strong immunoreactivity against DAstV-1 with an ELISA titer of 1:512 [14]. Such polyvalent antibodies can be used in capture ELISAs for antigen detection or in competitive ELISAs for antibody detection, providing a broad-spectrum diagnostic tool for the complex etiology of DVH.

Monoclonal Antibodies and Epitope Mapping

The identification of specific viral epitopes is fundamental for developing highly specific serological tests. A landmark study identified a type-specific linear B-cell epitope (⁴⁵⁴STTESA⁴⁵⁹) in the ORF2 capsid protein of DAstV-1 using a monoclonal antibody (mAb 3D2) [10]. This epitope was highly conserved among DAstV-1 strains but showed no cross-reactivity with other DAstV serotypes (DAstV-2, -3, -4) [10]. This finding is of immense diagnostic value, as it provides a molecular target for developing serotype-specific diagnostic assays, such as peptide-based ELISAs or immunochromatographic strips, enabling precise differentiation between DAstV-1 and other circulating genotypes. The mAb 3D2 itself can be used in immunofluorescence assays (IFA) and immunohistochemistry (IHC) for detecting viral antigen in tissue sections, as demonstrated by its ability to reveal robust positive signals in the liver and kidneys of infected ducklings [4, 10].

Immunohistochemistry and Immunofluorescence

Immunohistochemistry (IHC) and immunofluorescence assays (IFA) are powerful techniques for visualizing viral antigen in situ, providing critical insights into tissue tropism and pathogenesis. Using rabbit anti-DAstV antibodies, IHC has confirmed that DAstV replicates predominantly in the liver and kidneys, with the intensity of positive signals correlating with the severity of clinical symptoms and histopathological lesions [4]. IFA has been successfully employed to confirm the expression of the DAstV capsid protein in infected cell cultures, such as duck embryo fibroblasts (DEFs) and Leghorn male hepatoma (LMH) cells, and to validate the rescue of recombinant viruses from infectious clones [40, 45]. These methods are indispensable for research into viral pathogenesis and for confirming the identity of isolated viruses in the laboratory.

Advanced Genomic and Metagenomic Surveillance

The advent of next-generation sequencing (NGS) and metagenomics has transformed our ability to discover novel viruses, characterize genetic diversity, and track viral evolution and transmission on a global scale.

Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing (m-NGS)

Metagenomic NGS (m-NGS) is an unbiased, high-throughput approach that sequences all nucleic acids present in a clinical sample, allowing for the simultaneous detection of all pathogens, including novel or unexpected ones. This technique has been pivotal in identifying emerging DAstV strains and characterizing co-infections. For instance, m-NGS was used to identify the first complete genome of a DHAV-3 strain from Egypt and, critically, to discover a novel duck astrovirus co-infecting with DHAV-3 in the same ducklings [1]. This finding would have been impossible using targeted PCR alone and highlights the power of m-NGS for uncovering complex viral etiologies. Similarly, m-NGS was instrumental in the discovery of DAstV-5 (JM strain), a novel genotype species causing visceral gout in ducklings, which shared only 15–45% genome sequence identity with other avastroviruses [5]. The technique has also been used to identify goose astrovirus as the primary pathogen in Muscovy ducks with severe symptoms, confirming a cross-species transmission event [13]. The application of m-NGS for routine surveillance, while currently cost-prohibitive for many labs, is becoming increasingly important for early detection of emerging threats and for monitoring the virome of waterfowl populations [51].

Whole-Genome Sequencing and Phylogenetic Analysis

Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) of isolated DAstV strains is essential for detailed molecular characterization, evolutionary studies, and tracking transmission pathways. Studies have employed NGS on platforms like the Illumina HiSeq to obtain complete genomes of DAstV-1, DAstV-3, and GoAstV isolates [2, 6, 11, 12]. Phylogenetic analysis of these genomes has revealed the existence of distinct genotypes (e.g., DAstV-1 through -5, GoAstV-1 and -2) and has provided evidence for cross-border transmission links between strains from China and Egypt [1, 5, 17]. Furthermore, WGS data has enabled the identification of recombination events, a key driver of astrovirus evolution, and the detection of specific amino acid mutations in the capsid protein that may be associated with increased virulence or host range expansion [17, 26, 29]. For example, analysis of GoAstV strains identified two major mutation sites (456 E/D and 540 L/Q) in the capsid protein that correlate with distinct phylogenetic subgroups [17]. This level of genomic resolution is critical for developing effective vaccines and for understanding the molecular determinants of pathogenesis.

Surveillance Strategies and Epidemiological Monitoring

Effective surveillance is the bedrock of disease control. A multi-pronged strategy combining active and passive surveillance, molecular epidemiology, and risk-based sampling is essential for understanding the dynamics of DAstV infection.

Active and Passive Surveillance Programs

Active surveillance involves the systematic collection and testing of samples from healthy or at-risk populations to determine prevalence, identify subclinical infections, and monitor for emerging strains. Large-scale active surveillance studies in China, involving thousands of samples from ducks and geese across multiple provinces, have been instrumental in defining the epidemiological landscape of waterfowl astroviruses [2, 3, 16, 22]. For instance, a study of 1,546 samples from 13 provinces revealed an overall positive rate of 16.8% for DAstV-3, DAstV-4, GoAstV-1, and GoAstV-2, with the highest rates found on farms and in slaughterhouses [22]. These studies have also documented widespread cross-host transmission (e.g., GoAstV infecting ducks) and mixed infections with multiple astrovirus genotypes, highlighting the complexity of the epidemiological situation [3, 13, 22]. Passive surveillance, which relies on the diagnostic investigation of clinical outbreaks, is equally important. Investigating outbreaks of hepatitis or gout in ducklings and goslings has led to the isolation and characterization of numerous novel strains, including DAstV-5 and various GoAstV strains [5, 18, 19, 37].

Risk-Based Surveillance and Targeted Sampling

Surveillance efforts can be optimized by focusing on high-risk populations and critical control points. Studies have demonstrated that **vertical

References

[1] El-Mayet FS, Moharam I, El-Nahas E, El-Habbaa A, Najar F, Stayton E, et al.. First identification of concurrent infections with novel emerging duck astrovirus and duck hepatitis A virus type 3 (DHAV-3) in ducklings in Egypt using metagenomic next-generation sequencing (m-NGS).. Avian Pathology. 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03079457.2025.2581279

[2] Han M, Wu R, Jin P, Wang J, Xu C, Chen L, et al.. Molecular characterization and evolutionary analysis of a duck astrovirus type 3 strain. Poultry Science. 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2025.106267

[3] Xu J, Yin L, Guo Y, Yan Z, Yu S, Jiang T, et al.. The biological characteristics of DAstV molecular epidemiology and pathogenicity of duck astrovirus causing hepatitis in ducks and chickens in Southeast China. Poultry Science. 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2024.104076

[4] Xu J, Yin L, Yan Z, Guo Y, Su Z, Lin W, et al.. Impact of duck astrovirus on susceptibility to infection across duck ages. Poultry Science. 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2024.103564

[5] Zhang J, Huang Y, Li L, Dong J, Kuang R, Liao M, et al.. First Identification and Genetic Characterization of a Novel Duck Astrovirus in Ducklings in China. Frontiers in Veterinary Science. 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2022.873062

[6] Wei F, Wang Q, Yang J, Wang Y, Jiang X, He D, et al.. The isolation and characterization of Duck astrovirus type- 1remerging in China.. Transboundary and Emerging Diseases. 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/tbed.14444

[7] Li Y, Cui Y, Liu H, Wang J, Li Y, Wang Y. Establishment of Duplex SYBR Green I-based Real-time PCR Assay for Simultaneous Detection of Duck Hepatitis A Virus-1 and Duck Astrovirus-3. Avian diseases. 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1637/aviandiseases-D-20-00115

[8] . duck astrovirus 2. CABI Compendium. 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1079/cabicompendium.119400

[9] . duck astrovirus 1. CABI Compendium. 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1079/cabicompendium.84186

[10] Lan J, Zhang R, Li P, Chen J, Xie Z, Jiang S. Identification of a Type-Specific Epitope in the ORF2 Protein of Duck Astrovirus Type 1. Animals. 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ani9121069

[11] Wei F, Wang Y, Zhang S, Yang J, Diao X, Tang Y. The isolation and characterization of Duck astrovirus type- 1remerging in China. . 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22541/au.160407200.07571644/v1

[12] Wei F, Yang J, Wang Y, Chen H, Diao Y, Tang Y. Isolation and characterization of a duck-origin goose astrovirus in China. Emerging Microbes and Infections. 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/22221751.2020.1765704

[13] Liu H, Sun R, Wu Y, Feng J, Fan G, Chen S, et al.. Molecular detection and identification of goose astrovirus in GuangDong Province, China.. Infection, Genetics and Evolution. 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meegid.2025.105745

[14] Zhao S, Wang D, Qin Y, Mao M, Li Y, Hao Y, et al.. Decoding cross-serotype interference in duck hepatitis viruses: Trivalent IgY targeting DHAV-1, DHAV-3 and DAstV-1.. Virology. 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.virol.2025.110776

[15] Li Y, Luo J, Zhang F, Shang J, Deng C, Feng Y, et al.. Establishment and application of quadruple fluorescence quantitative RT-PCR method for the identification of waterfowl astrovirus. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2024.1328243

[16] Zhang F, Li Y, Jiang W, Yu X, Zhuang Q, Wang S, et al.. Surveillance and genetic diversity analysis of avian astrovirus in China. PLoS ONE. 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0264308

[17] Wang H, Zhu Y, Ye W, Hua J, Chen L, Ni Z, et al.. Genomic and Epidemiological Characteristics Provide Insights into the Phylogeographic Spread of Goose Astrovirus in China.. Transboundary and Emerging Diseases. 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/tbed.14522

[18] Chen Q, Yu Z, Xu X, Ji J, Yao L, Kan Y, et al.. First report of a novel goose astrovirus outbreak in Muscovy ducklings in China. Poultry Science. 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2021.101407

[19] Chen H, Zhang B, Yan M, Diao Y, Tang Y. First report of a novel goose astrovirus outbreak in Cherry Valley ducklings in China.. Transboundary and Emerging Diseases. 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/tbed.13418

[20] Yuan X, Meng K, Zhang Y, Yu Z, Ai W, Wang Y. Genome analysis of newly emerging goose-origin nephrotic astrovirus in China reveals it belongs to a novel genetically distinct astrovirus.. Infection, Genetics and Evolution. 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meegid.2018.10.014

[21] Mendenhall I, Yaung KN, Joyner P, Keatts L, Borthwick S, Neves ES, et al.. Detection of a novel astrovirus from a black-naped monarch (Hypothymis azurea) in Cambodia. Virology Journal. 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12985-015-0413-2

[22] Li Y, Luo J, Shang J, Zhang F, Deng C, Feng Y, et al.. Epidemiological investigation and pathogenicity analysis of waterfowl astroviruses in some areas of China. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2024.1375826

[23] Wu B, Jiang X, He D, Wei F, Mao M, Zhu Y, et al.. Epidemiological investigation of fowl adenovirus (FAdV) infections in ducks and geese in Shandong Province, China. Avian Pathology. 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03079457.2024.2302138

[24] Pantin-Jackwood M, Todd DA, Koci MD. Avian Astroviruses. Astrovirus Research. 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-4735-1_9

[25] Liu C, Sun M, Liao M. A Review of Emerging Goose Astrovirus Causing Gout. BioMed Research International. 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/1635373

[26] Fei Z, Jiao A, Xu M, Wu J, Wang Y, Yu J, et al.. Genetic diversity and evolution of goose astrovirus in the east of China.. Transboundary and Emerging Diseases. 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/tbed.14542

[27] Li L, Sun M, Zhang Y, Liao M. A Review of the Emerging Poultry Visceral Gout Disease Linked to Avian Astrovirus Infection. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms231810429

[28] Aguilera-Flores C, López T, Zamudio F, Sandoval-Jaime C, Pérez EI, López S, et al.. The Capsid Precursor Protein of Astrovirus VA1 Is Proteolytically Processed Intracellularly. bioRxiv. 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1128/jvi.00665-22

[29] Zhu Q, Miao Y, Wang J, Bai W, Yang X, Yu S, et al.. Isolation, identification, and pathogenicity of a goose astrovirus causing fatal gout in goslings.. Veterinary Microbiology. 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetmic.2022.109570

[30] Wohlgemuth N, Honce R, Schultz‐Cherry S. Astrovirus evolution and emergence. Infection, Genetics and Evolution. 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meegid.2019.01.009

[31] Zhang X, Deng T, Song Y, Liu J, Jiang Z, Peng Z, et al.. Identification and genomic characterization of emerging goose astrovirus in central China, 2020.. Transboundary and Emerging Diseases. 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/tbed.14060

[32] Li J, Hu W, Liu T, Zhang H, Opriessnig T, Xiao C. Isolation and evolutionary analyses of gout-associated goose astrovirus causing disease in experimentally infected chickens. Poultry Science. 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2020.11.003

[33] Wei F, Yang J, He D, Diao Y, Tang Y. Evidence of vertical transmission of novel astrovirus virus in goose.. Veterinary Microbiology. 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetmic.2020.108657

[34] An D, Zhang J, Yang J, Tang Y, Diao Y. Novel goose-origin astrovirus infection in geese: the effect of age at infection. Poultry Science. 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2020.05.041

[35] Ou X, Mao S, Dong J, Chen J, Sun D, Wang M, et al.. A proposed disease classification system for duck viral hepatitis. Poultry Science. 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2022.102042

[36] Wang J, Xu C, Zeng M, Yue H, Tang C. Identification of a novel astrovirus in goats in China.. Infection, Genetics and Evolution. 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meegid.2021.105105

[37] Zhang Q, Cao Y, Wang J, Fu G, Sun M, Zhang L, et al.. Isolation and characterization of an astrovirus causing fatal visceral gout in domestic goslings. Emerging Microbes and Infections. 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41426-018-0074-5

[38] Zhai S, Li R, Liu K, Gao H, Yang X, Zhao J, et al.. Adenosine deaminase promotes goose astrovirus genotype II replication in GEF cells. Poultry Science. 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2025.105176

[39] Li R, Zhai S, Gao S, Yang X, Zhao J, Zhang X, et al.. Goose IFIT5 positively regulates goose astrovirus replication in GEF cells. Poultry Science. 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2024.103930

[40] Zhang R, Lan J, Li H, Chen J, Yang Y, Lin S, et al.. A novel method to rescue and culture duck Astrovirus type 1 in vitro. Virology Journal. 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12985-019-1218-5

[41] Delgado-Cunningham K, López T, Khatib F, Arias C, DuBois R. Structure of the Divergent Human Astrovirus MLB Capsid Spike. Structure. 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.str.2022.10.010

[42] Yin D, Tian J, Yang J, Tang Y, Diao Y. Pathogenicity of novel goose-origin astrovirus causing gout in goslings. BMC Veterinary Research. 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-020-02739-z

[43] Ricemeyer L, Aguilar-Hernández N, López T, Espinosa R, Lanning S, Mukherjee S, et al.. Structures of Two Human Astrovirus Capsid/Neutralizing Antibody Complexes Reveal Distinct Epitopes and Inhibition of Virus Attachment to Cells. Journal of Virology. 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1128/JVI.01415-21

[44] Wang A, Zhang S, Xie J, Gu L, Wu S, Wu Z, et al.. Isolation and characterization of a goose astrovirus 1 strain causing fatal gout in goslings, China. Poultry Science. 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2021.101432

[45] Chen L, Zhu Y, Yun T, Ye W, Ni Z, Hua J, et al.. In vitro expression of the goose astrovirus Cap protein delivered with a duck enteritis virus vector. BMC Veterinary Research. 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-025-04654-7

[46] Yu T, Wu X, Cao Z, Zhang X, Jiang X, Zhao J, et al.. Preparation and Preliminary Application of Egg Yolk Antibody against Duck-derived Astrovirus. Academic Journal of Agriculture & Life Sciences. 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25236/ajals.2024.050104

[47] Dai Y, Hu X, Zhong Y, Chen L, Wang J, Yin D, et al.. Rapid Detection of Duck Enteritis Virus with MIRA, MIRA–qPCR, and MIRA–LFD Assays. Pathogens. 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens14100980

[48] Song X, Yang P, Zhang X, Cao J, Huang W, Peng Z, et al.. Development and preliminary application of a multiplex PCR method for the detection of goose parvovirus and goose astrovirus 1 and 2. Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation. 2026. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/10406387261436326

[49] Dai Y, Zhong Y, Xu F, Gu S, Zhou H, Wang J, et al.. Development and evaluation of three multienzyme isothermal rapid amplification assays for fowl adenovirus serotype 4. Poultry Science. 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2024.104452

[50] Wang C, Liu H, Cheng J, Pan S, Yang W, Wei X, et al.. One-Step Multiplex Real-Time Fluorescent Quantitative Reverse Transcription PCR for Simultaneous Detection of Four Waterfowl Viruses. Microorganisms. 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms12122423

[51] Ma L, Lyu W, Zeng T, Wang W, Chen Q, Zhao J, et al.. Duck gut metagenome reveals the microbiome signatures linked to intestinal regional, temporal development, and rearing condition. iMeta. 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/imt2.198

[52] Zheng L, Zhang H. A reverse transcription recombinase-aided amplification assay for the rapid detection of goose astrovirus. Veterinary Research Forum. 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30466/vrf.2024.2034344.4346