Avian Rotavirus

Overview and Taxonomy of Avian Rotavirus

Avian rotaviruses (ARVs) constitute a diverse group of viruses belonging to the Reoviridae family and are responsible for a variety of enteric diseases in birds, often resulting in significant economic losses within the poultry industry. Taxonomically, these viruses are classified based on their genomic constellations, antigenic properties, and nucleotide sequence identities of key gene segments. Avian rotaviruses have been identified in several groups, including Group A (AvRVA), D (AvRVD), F (AvRVF), and G (AvRVG), among others, each with distinct phylogenetic and molecular signatures that define their evolution and host range [7, 10, 17].

Molecular Structure and Genomic Organization

Rotaviruses are non-enveloped viruses with segmented double-stranded RNA genomes consisting of 11 distinct segments. These segments encode structural proteins such as VP1 (the viral polymerase), VP2 (the core shell protein), VP4 (the spike protein), VP6 (the major group antigen), VP7 (the outer capsid glycoprotein), and non-structural proteins (NSPs) involved in replication and pathogenesis [9, 16]. In avian rotaviruses, the VP6 protein plays a critical role in classifying the virus into different groups due to its high antigenicity and conserved structure [9]. Specifically, the antigenic determinants and genomic diversity of VP6, alongside other proteins like VP4 and VP7, provide the molecular basis for subgrouping and discerning between novel genotypes, as demonstrated by studies that have identified unique genotypes such as P[56] and G40 in strains detected from wild bird species [3].

The genetic heterogeneity observed within avian rotaviruses stems largely from the segmented nature of the genome, facilitating gene reassortment and the emergence of novel strains. Examples of this include the identification of new genotypes in migratory birds, such as those isolated from velvet scoters and gulls, where novel constellation patterns (e.g., G28-P[17]-I21-R14-C14-M13-A24-N14-T16-E21-H16) have expanded our understanding of the genetic diversity intrinsic to these viruses [5, 6]. Such findings underscore the evolutionary potential of ARVs, driven by gene segment exchange and adaptation to diverse avian hosts.

Taxonomic Classification and Phylogenetic Analyses

The taxonomic classification of avian rotaviruses is underpinned by comprehensive phylogenetic analyses of individual gene segments. Studies have utilized high throughput sequencing and reverse genetics techniques to elucidate the relationships between distinct ARV strains [4, 8]. For example, Japanese pigeon isolates have been demonstrated to cluster with foreign ARVA strains when analyzed based on whole-genome sequences, emphasizing the existence of common ancestry and global distribution of specific ARVA genotypes [8]. Comparative genetic investigations not only enable the distinguishing of different rotavirus groups but also reveal instances of interspecies transmission, whereby genetic material from avian rotaviruses has been found in mammalian hosts, hence highlighting zoonotic potential [12, 13].

Phylogenetic trees constructed from the conserved segments of the genome, such as VP6, have been essential for delineating the boundaries between the major groups of avian rotaviruses. Furthermore, the use of next-generation sequencing (NGS) and multiplex RT–qPCR assays has substantially improved the resolution at which these virus families can be studied. These studies have revealed that while Group A rotaviruses are widely recognized in both avian and mammalian hosts, Groups D, F, and G exhibit distinctive migration patterns on polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and unique sequence signatures that support their classification into separate taxonomic entities [7, 10, 17].

The establishment of reverse genetics systems for certain avian rotavirus strains, such as the prototype strain PO-13, has provided an invaluable tool for functional analyses and further taxonomic refinement [4]. By rescuing recombinant viruses with targeted genetic markers, these studies pave the way for a deeper understanding of the molecular determinants governing host specificity, pathogenicity, and the mechanisms of viral evolution. Detailed examinations of the outer capsid proteins (VP4 and VP7) have yielded insights into the antigenic diversity that underscores the taxonomic complexities within ARVs, as these proteins are subject to selection pressures from the host immune response and environmental factors [2, 3].

Epidemiological Considerations and Global Distribution

The epidemiology of avian rotaviruses mirrors their taxonomic diversity, with studies revealing a high prevalence of multiple ARV species within commercial poultry environments as well as in wild bird populations. In poultry, ARVs contribute significantly to enteritis and runting-stunting syndrome (RSS), conditions that are linked to poor performance efficiency indexes (PEIs) in broiler chicks [7]. Epidemiological surveillance using sensitive SYBR Green real-time PCR and multiplex molecular assays has demonstrated coinfections with ARVs and other enteric viruses such as chicken astrovirus and avian nephritis virus, further complicating diagnosis and management strategies [1, 11]. These observations are supported by global surveillance efforts which are often referenced by international bodies including the World Organisation for Animal Health (WOAH) and the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), emphasizing the economic and public health implications of these viral infections.

Wild and migratory birds play a critical role in maintaining and disseminating ARVs over broad geographic areas. The detection of highly similar genotype constellations among ARV strains isolated from migratory birds in Japan and other countries indicates that these species serve as vectors for viral dispersal, thus influencing the global epidemiology of avian rotaviruses [6, 8]. Such findings hold significant implications for biosecurity in poultry operations and underscore the necessity for coordinated surveillance programs referenced by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the World Health Organization (WHO).

Importance of Continued Taxonomic and Molecular Research

In light of the evolving nature of avian rotaviruses, ongoing research into their taxonomy and molecular biology remains crucial. Detailed characterization of viral proteins, reassortment patterns, and host interactions provides critical data that inform vaccine development, pathogen detection, and antiviral strategies. Studies employing advanced genomic and bioinformatics tools continue to unravel the intricate evolutionary relationships among ARV strains and contribute to a more precise taxonomic framework. This research is fundamental not only for understanding viral pathogenesis and transmission but also for guiding preventative measures and managing outbreaks in both commercial and wild avian populations [2, 14, 15].

Together, these exhaustive studies illustrate a complex and dynamic taxonomy of avian rotaviruses, reflecting extensive genetic diversity and an ability to adapt to varied hosts and environmental conditions. The integration of classical virological techniques with modern molecular diagnostics offers a robust platform for elucidating the rich evolutionary landscape of these economically critical pathogens.

Molecular Pathogenesis and Host-Virus Interactions of Avian Rotavirus

Avian rotaviruses represent a multifaceted group of viruses whose molecular pathogenesis is governed by the intricate interplay of viral structural and non-structural proteins with host cell receptors and immune components. Central to the pathogenesis is the sophisticated structure of the rotavirus, characterized by a triple-layered protein capsid that protects the segmented double-stranded RNA genome. The outer capsid proteins VP4 and VP7 not only determine serotype specificity but also mediate the initial attachment and entry into host cells, a process that is finely tuned by receptor recognition and subsequent conformational changes driven by the viral entry machinery [2, 16]. This characteristic enables the virus to penetrate the gastrointestinal epithelium of avian hosts, a portal critical for viral replication and disease induction.

Viral Entry and Initial Host Interactions

The process of cell entry is intricately linked to reversible interactions between viral spike proteins and specific glycan receptors present on the surface of enterocytes. Structural investigations have revealed that these interactions trigger receptor-mediated endocytosis, thereby permitting the virus to circumvent the extracellular barriers and reach intracellular replication sites [16]. In avian rotaviruses, VP4 cleaves into VP5* and VP8*, a mechanism that has been implicated in exposing the hydrophobic regions necessary for membrane penetration. This mechanism not only facilitates viral entry but may also contribute to species-specific tropism, wherein variations among the VP4 sequences among strains influence their capacity to infect heterologous hosts, as evidenced by certain avian strains demonstrating the potential to cross species barriers [12, 13].

Replication and Role of the Viral Genome

Once internalized, the virus uncoats to release its segmented RNA genome, which is then transcribed and replicated within cytoplasmic viroplasms, specialized inclusions that serve as replication factories. The viral protein VP6 plays a pivotal role in these processes by forming the intermediate capsid layer and regulating the transcriptional activity of the viral RNA-dependent RNA polymerase VP1. Sensitive real-time RT-PCR assays targeting VP6 have provided insights into viral load and kinetics in infected tissues, underscoring its utility as both a diagnostic marker and a functional mediator of replication [9]. Experimental systems, including novel reverse genetics approaches developed for certain strains such as the PO-13 strain, have enabled researchers to manipulate the segmented genome and assess the contribution of individual proteins to replication and virulence [4]. These systems also allow the introduction of genetic markers, thereby tracking viral evolution and adaptation in experimental models.

Syncytium Formation and Host Cell Modulation

A remarkable feature of several rotavirus species is the expression of fusion-associated small transmembrane (FAST) proteins, notably those encoded by the NSP1 gene in certain rotaviruses. FAST proteins such as those described in avian species modulate cell–cell fusion, culminating in the formation of multinucleated syncytia. Detailed studies have shown that the N-terminal and transmembrane domains of these proteins are critical determinants of cell type-specific fusion activity, suggesting that they may require host factors that are differentially expressed across species or cell types [18, 19]. The formation of syncytia not only facilitates rapid cell-to-cell spread of the virus, bypassing the host’s extracellular immune defenses, but also plays a role in modulating the host immune response by altering normal cellular architecture and signaling pathways. This mechanism represents a significant aspect of viral immunopathogenesis, as it may contribute both to local tissue damage and to the evasion of host immune surveillance mechanisms advocated by international bodies such as the World Health Organization (WHO) and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).

Immune Evasion and Host Response

Avian rotaviruses have evolved a variety of strategies to evade host immune responses. Their segmented genome, which is susceptible to genetic reassortment, allows for the rapid emergence of novel strains with altered antigenicity. This genetic plasticity is further compounded by the virus’s capacity to modulate interferon signaling pathways, which is essential for neutering the innate immune response during the early phases of infection. Non-structural proteins are thought to interact with host intracellular signaling components, thereby dampening the production of antiviral cytokines and promoting a microenvironment conducive to viral replication. Studies employing reverse genetics have demonstrated that engineered mutations in these regulatory proteins can significantly impact replication efficiency and pathogenicity, emphasizing the intricate balance between viral invasion strategies and host immune defenses [2, 4].

Moreover, the interplay between the host’s cellular receptors and viral attachment proteins is influenced by the evolutionary pressures exerted by host immunity. For instance, variations in the VP7 protein, a glycoprotein exposed on the viral surface, have been linked to differential binding affinities and antigenic properties, thereby affecting virulence and pathogenic outcomes. Such variations not only determine the efficiency of viral entry but also contribute to the virus’s ability to persist in avian populations, as well as its capacity for zoonotic spillover in cases where avian and mammalian interactions are frequent [12, 13].

Host Range and Cross-species Transmission

The molecular determinants facilitating cross-species transmission of avian rotaviruses have garnered increasing attention, particularly given the documented cases where avian strains have successfully infected mammalian hosts. Experimental transmission studies in suckling mice have provided direct evidence that certain avian rotaviruses, despite their evolutionary divergence, can induce clinical symptoms such as diarrhea in non-avian hosts [12]. These findings highlight the potential epidemiological risk posed by avian rotaviruses, especially in settings where host intermingling occurs, such as in mixed farming systems or environments frequented by migratory birds. Such interspecies transmission events underscore the importance of robust surveillance programs, as recommended by international organizations like the World Organisation for Animal Health (WOAH) and the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), to monitor and mitigate the risk of emerging zoonotic infections.

Viral Evolution and Epidemiological Implications

Genetic reassortment, particularly involving the VP4 and VP3 genes, plays a critical role in the evolution of avian rotaviruses, contributing to the generation of novel genotypes with potentially altered host specificities and virulence profiles [2, 14]. The ability of avian rotaviruses to exchange genome segments with mammalian strains highlights their potential role as reservoirs for emerging pathogens. Studies employing plasmid-based reverse genetics have provided key insights into the compatibility of avian genes with those of mammalian strains, demonstrating that certain avian segments, such as VP3 and VP4, can functionally substitute in heterologous virus backbones [14]. This molecular compatibility not only facilitates reassortment but also accentuates the inherent risks of zoonotic transmission, necessitating continuous molecular surveillance in both avian and mammalian populations.

Collectively, the molecular pathogenesis and host-virus interactions of avian rotaviruses reveal a complex landscape where viral entry mechanisms, replication strategies, immune modulation, and genetic reassortment converge to dictate the clinical outcomes of infection. These insights, underpinned by advanced molecular studies and reverse genetic systems, provide a detailed understanding of the dynamic interplay between avian rotaviruses and their hosts, with significant implications for disease control and prevention strategies in both veterinary and public health contexts.

Epidemiology and Prevalence Patterns in Poultry Populations

The epidemiology of avian rotavirus in poultry populations is complex and multifactorial, involving multiple virus groups, coinfections, and diverse host responses that collectively contribute to its impact on the poultry industry. Avian rotaviruses, particularly those belonging to groups A, D, and F, have been repeatedly implicated in cases of enteritis, runting-stunting syndrome (RSS), and other production issues that result in serious economic losses. Advances in molecular diagnostics have now allowed researchers to study these viruses with unprecedented sensitivity, revealing intricate prevalence patterns across different geographical regions and within diverse management systems [1, 7, 17, 20].

Prevalence in Commercial Flocks and Production Settings

Investigations in commercial flocks underscore the significant burden of avian rotavirus infection within poultry. In a study conducted on chickens with enteritis in Ecuador, a multiplex real-time RT–qPCR assay revealed extremely high positivity rates, with nearly 97% of tested birds harboring at least one enteric virus. Although that work targeted several pathogens concurrently, its findings underscore the pervasive nature of viral enteric infections in poultry, with avian rotavirus playing a notable role in the overall disease complex [1]. Similarly, surveys in Brazilian broiler flocks have provided a detailed picture of rotavirus prevalence; in these flocks, approximately 83% of the flocks and 23.4% of individual chicks were found to be positive for avian rotavirus. Notably, the detection rates were significantly higher in flocks that recorded poor performance efficiency indexes (PEI), suggesting a direct link between viral infection and suboptimal growth performance and productivity [7]. This correlation not only highlights the economic impact of these infections but also points to the possibility that poor flock management and inadequate biosecurity practices can both contribute to and result from the presence of rotavirus infections.

Age-related prevalence patterns have also emerged from these studies. Younger birds, particularly chicks between 7 and 9 days old, show a higher incidence of infections with certain rotavirus species such as groups D and F, whereas group A rotavirus tends to become more prevalent in slightly older birds (13–14 days old) [7]. This age dependency may reflect differences in immune maturity, exposure dynamics, or susceptibility, and it merits consideration in the design of targeted vaccination programs and management interventions. Global organizations such as the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the World Organisation for Animal Health (WOAH) stress the importance of integrating these epidemiological insights into biosecurity and disease control strategies to mitigate zoonotic risks and economic losses.

Molecular Diversity and Coinfections in Poultry Populations

Molecular epidemiology has revealed that strain diversity is a hallmark of avian rotavirus populations in poultry. Studies employing cell culture-adapted isolates from chickens have uncovered multiple genotype constellations, such as G19-P[22]-I11-R6-C6-M7-A16-N6-T8-E10-H8, indicating that these viruses are not only widespread but also highly genetically diverse [15]. This diversity increases the potential for viral reassortment and the emergence of new strains with novel pathogenic properties. In addition, coinfections with other enteric viruses, for example chicken astrovirus, have been documented in broiler chickens displaying severe clinical signs of RSS, which complicates both diagnosis and disease management [11]. These mixed infections may exacerbate clinical symptoms and impair the efficiency of the host immune response, further complicating control measures.

The prevalence and patterns of coinfections suggest that, in addition to direct viral damage, interaction among multiple pathogens in the gut may worsen clinical outcomes. This has important implications for both vaccination strategies and the development of comprehensive biosecurity protocols. An integrated approach that monitors multiple pathogens simultaneously is critical, as supported by data from global surveillance studies coordinated by agencies such as the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO).

Diagnostic Advances and Their Impact on Epidemiological Studies

The evolution of diagnostic techniques has been pivotal in advancing our understanding of avian rotavirus epidemiology. Traditional virus isolation methods and serological assays have now been largely supplemented by sophisticated molecular techniques. For instance, the use of multiplex RT–qPCR, as demonstrated in studies on Ecuadorian poultry, has allowed for the simultaneous detection and differentiation of several enteric viruses, thereby providing a clearer picture of virus prevalence and coinfection dynamics within flocks [1]. Further refinement of molecular assays, such as SYBR Green-based real-time PCR which can detect as low as a single copy of viral RNA, has enhanced the sensitivity and specificity of detection protocols, allowing researchers to identify subclinical infections that may otherwise go unnoticed [9]. These advances are crucial for early outbreak detection and for tracking the spread of both endemic and emerging rotavirus strains.

In the context of poultry populations, the combination of sensitive diagnostic tools with routine surveillance enables timely intervention. Continuous monitoring is essential not only for understanding epidemiological trends but also for guiding practical control measures. Surveillance efforts that integrate diagnostic results into flock management practices can reduce the incidence of outbreaks and, ultimately, minimize economic losses.

Environmental Factors, Biosecurity, and the Role of Wild Birds

The epidemiological landscape of avian rotaviruses is further complicated by environmental and ecological factors. In regions with high poultry density, inadequate biosecurity measures, or frequent exposure to wild birds, the risk of virus dissemination is markedly increased. Wild birds, including migratory species, may act as reservoirs or vectors for various rotavirus strains, facilitating viral spread and the introduction of novel genotypes into commercial flocks [1, 21]. These interspecies interactions are of particular concern given the potential for zoonotic transmission, a scenario that is closely monitored by international bodies like the World Health Organization (WHO) and the CDC.

In addition, the transmission dynamics in densely populated commercial environments tend to support rapid viral exchange and reassortment. This setting creates an ideal scenario for the evolution of highly diverse rotavirus strains that can escape existing immunity or compromise the efficacy of available vaccines. It also necessitates the adoption of strict biosecurity protocols and targeted surveillance to prevent widespread outbreaks and contain the movement of viral strains across regions.

Integrating Epidemiological Data into Management Practices

The high prevalence rates of avian rotavirus in poultry, the observed age-related susceptibility, and the occurrence of coinfections underscore the critical need for integrated disease management strategies. Data from molecular epidemiology studies must inform practical control measures on farms, including enhanced biosecurity protocols, routine screening using advanced molecular diagnostic tools, and, where feasible, the development of effective vaccination programs tailored

Diagnostic Strategies and Molecular Detection Techniques for Avian Rotavirus

The diagnosis of avian rotavirus infections in poultry has evolved significantly over the past decades, integrating both conventional methods and advanced molecular techniques that allow for rapid, sensitive, and high-throughput detection. The primary focus of current diagnostic strategies is on molecular detection, particularly through reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and its quantitative derivative (RT-qPCR), which have become indispensable due to their ability to detect low copy numbers of viral RNA in clinical samples. Advances in molecular diagnostics not only enhance our understanding of the epidemiology of avian rotaviruses but also aid organizations such as the World Organization for Animal Health (WOAH) and the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) in monitoring and controlling outbreaks with zoonotic and economic implications.

Multiplex RT–qPCR Assays

One of the most compelling diagnostic advancements is the development of multiplex RT–qPCR assays, which enable simultaneous detection of multiple viruses that contribute to enteric diseases in avian species. For example, studies have demonstrated the use of multiplex RT–qPCR assays capable of detecting avian rotavirus A alongside pathogens such as chicken astrovirus, avian nephritis virus, infectious bronchitis virus, and avian orthoreovirus [1]. These assays employ carefully designed primers and hydrolysis probes for target viral genes, such as those coding for the VP6 protein, which is highly conserved among rotaviruses. The concurrent amplification of multiple genetic targets in a single reaction not only conserves time and reagents but also provides a broad-spectrum diagnostic tool crucial for addressing coinfections, a common epidemiologic feature in flocks showing runting-stunting syndrome (RSS) and other enteric diseases [1, 11]. The multiplex approach also ensures specificity by eliminating cross-reactivity amongst different viral genomes, with reported efficiencies in the range of 98.8–105.9% and a detection limit as sensitive as one copy/μL [1].

SYBR Green-Based Real-Time PCR

In addition to probe-based assays, SYBR Green-based real-time RT-PCR represents another robust molecular detection strategy. The sensitivity of these assays, as described by Torre et al., is particularly important when dealing with samples preserved on FTA cards and other degraded specimens frequently encountered in field conditions [9]. The SYBR Green chemistry allows the amplification and real-time quantification of viral RNA by directly intercalating into the double-stranded DNA produced during PCR, ensuring that even minimal viral loads can be detected. The approach is advantageous due to its simplicity and lower cost compared to probe-based systems while still maintaining high efficiency and reproducibility, which are critical factors for widespread surveillance in resource-limited settings [9]. This technique further enhances diagnostic capabilities by facilitating rapid turnaround times in diagnostic laboratories, an aspect emphasized by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) when monitoring pathogens with high zoonotic potential.

RT-PCR Coupled with Electrophoretic and Sequencing Techniques

Several studies have reported the use of conventional RT-PCR in combination with polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE) for the detection and preliminary characterization of avian rotaviruses. Electrophoretic techniques such as silver-stained PAGE allow for the visualization of the segmented double-stranded RNA genome of rotaviruses and can indicate the presence of mixed infections [7, 20]. Once electrophoretic patterns suggest the presence of rotavirus, RT-PCR amplification of specific genes, such as VP6, VP4, and NSP5, is performed for confirmation and further molecular characterization [20]. The subsequent sequencing and phylogenetic analyses of these amplicons provide insights into the genetic diversity and the evolutionary dynamics of the virus. For instance, identification of novel genotypes or recombinant strains has important epidemiological implications, given that distinct lineages may contribute to differences in clinical outcomes or vaccine efficacies [3, 8].

Next-Generation Sequencing and Genomic Analysis

With the increasing importance of precision diagnostics, next-generation sequencing (NGS) has become an essential tool for in-depth genomic analysis of avian rotaviruses. This approach facilitates full-genome sequencing, allowing researchers to delineate the genetic constellation of circulating virus strains [15]. NGS-based diagnostics enable the high-resolution tracking of viral evolution and transmission routes, aiding epidemiological investigations and supporting efforts by global health agencies such as the World Health Organization (WHO) in monitoring zoonotic threats. Through NGS, researchers can perform comprehensive comparative analyses, identifying reassortment events that could give rise to novel strains with altered antigenic properties or pathogenicity profiles [14]. This level of genomic detail is critical for implementing effective biosecurity measures and optimizing vaccine development strategies.

Sample Collection, RNA Extraction, and the Role of Reverse Genetics

Diagnostic protocols begin with the meticulous collection of samples from clinically affected birds, including intestinal contents, fecal matter, and tissue homogenates. RNA extraction protocols must be optimized to yield high-quality RNA, which is a prerequisite for sensitive RT-PCR-based detection methods [9]. Recent advances have also seen the establishment of reverse genetics systems for avian rotaviruses, providing a platform to manipulate viral genomes and study their pathogenic mechanisms [4]. Although reverse genetics is commonly associated with vaccine development and mechanistic studies, its contribution to diagnostics cannot be understated. The ability to generate recombinant viruses with specific genetic markers facilitates the validation of diagnostic assays, ensuring they can sensitively and specifically detect the targeted segments of the viral genome.

Integration with Immunodiagnostic and Electron Microscopy Techniques

While molecular techniques remain the gold standard for avian rotavirus detection, immunodiagnostic methods and electron microscopy (EM) also play supportive roles in the diagnostic arsenal. Immunoenzymatic assays such as ELISA can screen for viral antigens in clinical samples; however, these methods are often complemented by molecular techniques to confirm infection [23, 24]. Electron microscopy, though less commonly used in routine diagnostics, provides valuable morphological confirmation of the virus, particularly when coupled with molecular data, thereby enhancing the overall reliability of the diagnosis [24]. This integrated approach is especially important for economically significant pathogens where rapid and accurate diagnosis is necessary to prevent widespread outbreaks that could impact both animal health and the agricultural economy.

The confluence of these advanced molecular detection techniques, high-throughput sequencing platforms, and traditional immunological methods forms a comprehensive framework that is essential for the accurate detection, characterization, and management of avian rotavirus infections. This integrative diagnostic strategy not only supports proactive disease control but also aligns with the recommendations from international organizations like the CDC, WHO, and FAO, ensuring that both animal and public health are safeguarded against the evolving threats posed by these economically critical pathogens.

Genetic Diversity and Evolutionary Dynamics of Avian Rotavirus Strains

Avian rotaviruses represent a fascinating model of genetic variability and dynamic evolution that underpins their capacity to adapt, cross species barriers, and impact both animal health and the poultry industry’s economic viability. The diversity of strains observed in avian rotaviruses is driven by a combination of viral genome reassortment, mutation, and selective pressures that operate in various host species and ecological niches.

Genomic Organization, Reassortment, and Novel Genotype Emergence

Avian rotaviruses, like other rotavirus species, possess segmented double-stranded RNA genomes, which facilitate genetic reassortment when two or more strains co-infect the same host cell. This mechanism drives considerable genetic variation and the emergence of novel reassortants with unique genotype constellations. Several studies have reported distinct genotype combinations in avian strains, such as the G18P[18] constellation found in pigeon and migratory bird isolates [4, 8, 26] and newly described genotypes from gulls and scoters [5, 6]. The identification of novel gene segments, where even the VP4 and VP7 outer capsid proteins can be classified under new genotypes, provides evidence that the genetic diversity of avian rotaviruses is far greater than previously appreciated [3, 5]. Notably, the utilization of reverse genetics systems [4] and plasmid-only-based approaches [14] has further illuminated the potential for reassortment events that enable avian rotavirus strains to exchange functionally critical genes, thereby altering virulence, host range, and antigenic properties.

Molecular characterization of avian rotavirus strains via full genome sequencing has revealed that gene segments can undergo profound divergence. For example, the complete genotype constellation of certain avian rotaviruses shows both high similarity among strains isolated in disparate geographic regions and, at the same time, evidence of unique phylogenetic clustering that underscores local adaptation [8, 15]. This interplay between conservation and variation not only enriches our understanding of the evolutionary pathways of these viruses but also underscores the challenges faced when designing broadly protective vaccine candidates, which must contend with rapidly shifting antigenic landscapes [2].

Phylogenetic Insights and Molecular Mechanisms Driving Diversity

Phylogenetic analyses have been instrumental in mapping the evolutionary trajectories of avian rotaviruses. Comparative studies have demonstrated that most gene segments of avian rotavirus strains cluster preferentially with those derived from avian hosts. However, intriguing exceptions exist, evidence of interspecies transmission is provided by strains whose VP4 or VP7 segments share higher identity with mammalian isolates [3, 13]. Such instances not only hint at past zoonotic transmission events but also reveal the inherently dynamic nature of the virus’s evolutionary history.

Studies focusing on the VP7 gene, a critical outer capsid protein involved in virus binding and neutralization, have highlighted domain-specific variations that are potentially linked to host specificity and immune escape mechanisms [25]. Analysis of conserved domains such as glycosylation sites and signal peptides has revealed that while certain functional features remain invariant, small amino acid substitutions in antigenically important regions can markedly alter the virus’s immunogenic profile. These changes likely contribute to evasion from host immune responses and underscore the importance of continuous surveillance, as recommended by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the World Organization for Animal Health (WOAH) for economically significant pathogens.

In addition, the presence of fusion-associated small transmembrane (FAST) proteins encoded by several avian rotavirus strains further demonstrates the versatility of the virus’s molecular evolution [18, 19]. The FAST proteins, which mediate cell–cell fusion and can facilitate viral spread without the need for extracellular release, are subject to variation that appears to be cell type-specific and may contribute to differences in viral pathogenicity among closely related strains. Functional studies examining the N-terminal and transmembrane domain swaps between divergent FAST proteins have provided clues about how these proteins modulate host cell interactions, influencing the efficiency of viral replication and possibly affecting the tropism of the viruses [18, 19].

Contribution of Host Ecology and Interspecies Transmission

The evolutionary dynamics of avian rotaviruses are strongly influenced by the host environment, particularly the role of migratory birds and wild species as reservoirs that facilitate global dissemination. Migratory birds, including gulls, scoters, and crows, have been shown to harbor genetically distinct strains that can be tracked phylogenetically across continents [3, 5, 6]. These wild avian reservoirs are implicated in the intercontinental spread of specific genotype constellations, which often appear in both geographically and ecologically disparate poultry production systems. The frequent intermingling of domestic and wild bird populations further enhances the potential for reassortment and emergence of novel strains capable of infecting a broad array of hosts [6, 8].

Moreover, the detection of avian-like rotavirus segments in mammals, ranging from cattle to even reports involving encephalitic presentations in foxes [12, 13, 27], lends further credence to the concept of cross-species spillover events. Such spillovers are of particular concern to international animal health agencies such as the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) and WOAH because they can herald the emergence of strains with altered tissue tropism or enhanced pathogenicity, thereby posing risks to both animal and human health.

Evolutionary Pressures and Vaccine Implications

The high mutation rates inherent to RNA viruses, coupled with the segmented nature of the rotavirus genome, create an environment where genetic drift and shift are common. For poultry industries facing periodic outbreaks and substantial economic losses from enteric and systemic infections, understanding these evolutionary pressures is critical for the development of effective prophylactic strategies. As illustrated by vaccine design studies, targeting conserved regions in the VP4 and VP7 proteins remains a viable approach, yet the continuous evolution of these antigenic epitopes poses challenges that must be overcome by employing advanced reverse genetics platforms and computational vaccinology approaches [2, 14].

Investigations into the molecular determinants of virulence and cell specificity, such as those linked to the NSP1 gene and the cooperative functions of VP1 and VP2 proteins, further contribute to our understanding of viral replication and pathogenicity [28]. Such studies not only provide insights into the fundamental biology of rotaviruses but also pave the way for the rational design of next-generation vaccines and antiviral therapies that require precise mapping of genetic variations across diverse rotavirus strains.

Collectively, the depth of genetic diversity observed in avian rotaviruses and their evolutionary dynamics underscore the complex interplay between viral genome plasticity, host ecology, and interspecies transmission. The continued surveillance and molecular characterization, aligned with recommendations from global health agencies such as the CDC, WHO, and WOAH, remain imperative in mitigating the impact of these viruses on both animal husbandry and public health.

Vaccine Development and Immunoprophylaxis Approaches Against Avian Rotavirus

Avian rotaviruses present a significant challenge in the poultry industry due to their impact on intestinal health, growth performance, and overall flock productivity. The development of effective vaccines and immunoprophylaxis strategies is essential to curtail these infections and reduce the associated economic losses. Recent advances in vaccine technology, particularly those employing molecular vaccinology and reverse genetics, have opened promising avenues for the design of next-generation vaccines against avian rotavirus.

Multi-Epitope Peptide Vaccines

One of the most innovative approaches in combating avian rotavirus infection involves the design of multi-epitope peptide vaccines. This strategy leverages advanced computational and vaccinomic techniques to identify conserved B-cell and T-cell epitopes derived from critical viral surface proteins such as VP4 and VP7. For instance, Hasan et al. [2] employed in silico methods to identify homologous regions from multiple serotypes and construct several unique vaccine candidates. By combining high-scoring epitopes with adjuvants and appropriate linkers, the designed vaccine candidate demonstrated enhanced antigenicity while exhibiting favorable physicochemical properties, including solubility and stability. The careful selection of epitopes ensures that the vaccine induces both robust humoral and cellular responses. This not only provides protection against circulating strains but may also address the antigenic heterogeneity observed among avian rotavirus strains, a challenge well-documented in the literature [2, 29]. Manufacturers and regulatory bodies such as the World Organisation for Animal Health (WOAH) and the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) emphasize the importance of such rational vaccine design to control zoonotic pathogens that impact trade and food security.

Live Virus and Reverse Genetics Approaches

Traditional live attenuated vaccines have historically provided robust immunity by mimicking natural infections; however, achieving attenuation without compromising immunogenicity is challenging. The development of reverse genetics systems, as demonstrated with the avian rotavirus A strain PO-13 [4], presents a groundbreaking opportunity to generate vaccines with precise genetic modifications. Reverse genetic techniques allow for the introduction of specific mutations or genetic markers, thereby facilitating the development of live attenuated vaccines that retain strong immunogenic properties while ensuring safety. This method also offers insights into the virus’s replication and pathogenic mechanisms, enabling targeted disruption of virulence factors without undermining the antigenic integrity necessary for protective immune responses. These approaches resonate with recommendations from leading institutions such as the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the World Health Organization (WHO), which stress the need for innovative vaccine platforms for economically important pathogens.

Vector-Based Vaccination Strategies

Another noteworthy strategy is the employment of live viral vectors, which not only express the immunodominant proteins of avian rotavirus but can also boost the host immune response upon administration. For example, Soliman et al. [29] described the use of a recombinant Newcastle disease virus (NDV) vector system engineered to express the rotavirus VP6 protein. The study highlighted that heterologous boosting with a chimeric NDV carrying distinct approved avian paramyxovirus proteins induced a more robust immune response compared with homologous prime-boost strategies. This approach is particularly attractive as NDV is already widely used within the poultry sector for immunization against multiple avian diseases. The advantage of such platforms lies in their ability to elicit both mucosal and systemic immunity, critical in the context of enteric infections. Additionally, the induction of strong innate immunity via interferon pathways further enhances the vaccine's protective potential. Given the zoonotic potential of certain avian rotavirus strains [12], the development of vector-based vaccines that can bridge cross-species barriers becomes even more important under guidelines from the CDC and WOAH.

Passive Immunization and Novel Inactivation Techniques

Passive immunoprophylaxis offers an alternative or adjunct approach to vaccination, particularly useful in scenarios where rapid protection is required or where direct vaccination is logistically challenging. Innovative approaches include the use of egg yolk antibodies (IgY) produced by immunizing laying hens. Skrobarczyk et al. [30] demonstrated that electron beam inactivation of rotavirus preserves antigenicity better than traditional chemical or thermal methods, leading to high titers of neutralizing antibodies in egg yolks. Although the referenced study focused on human rotavirus, the principles can be extrapolated to avian rotavirus, considering similar mechanisms of antigen–antibody interactions. The passive transfer of such IgY preparations has been shown to significantly reduce the severity of diarrhea in experimental models, offering rapid immunoprophylaxis that could be critical in outbreak scenarios. This method has the additional advantage of being cost-effective and practical for large-scale applications in the poultry industry.

Integration of Novel Immunoprophylactic Measures with Enhanced Biosecurity

In conjunction with vaccine development, immunoprophylaxis strategies must integrate with stringent biosecurity protocols to mitigate the spread of avian rotavirus. Modern avian vaccine development is increasingly adopting a “One Health” perspective, where vaccines are developed not solely based on protecting one species but by preventing interspecies transmission events that could have broader economic and public health implications. This integrated strategy is supported by epidemiological findings of interspecies transmissions [3, 12] and reassortment events [14] between avian and mammalian rotaviruses, which underscore the necessity of vaccines that can adapt to evolving strains. Collaborative efforts between industry stakeholders, governmental agencies, and international bodies like the WHO and FAO are essential for optimizing immunoprophylaxis protocols and ensuring vaccine efficacy across diverse field conditions.

Balancing Antigenic Diversity with Broad Spectrum Coverage

A critical obstacle in avian rotavirus vaccine development is the virus’s antigenic diversity, which necessitates a broad spectrum coverage to ensure cross-protective immunity. Multi-epitope vaccines and vector-based strategies are uniquely positioned to address this by incorporating conserved antigenic determinants that are less prone to mutation. The use of reverse genetics systems also permits the crafting of chimeric vaccine strains that have the potential to elicit protective immunity against a wide array of strains. The ongoing molecular surveillance and genetic characterizations [2, 4, 8] support these vaccination strategies by providing updated insights into the circulating genotypes and guiding the rational design of broad-spectrum vaccines.

In summary, the development of effective vaccine platforms against avian rotavirus involves a multifaceted approach, combining peptide-based immunogens, live attenuated vaccines derived from reverse genetics, viral vector-based systems, and passive immunoprophylaxis via IgY antibodies. These integrated approaches, coupled with enhanced biosecurity measures, underscore a progressive strategy that aligns with global health standards and regulatory recommendations from agencies such as the CDC, WHO, and FAO.

Clinical Implications, Coinfections, and Management Strategies in Avian Rotavirus Infections

Avian rotavirus infections have emerged as a significant health concern in commercial poultry production and wild bird populations due to their direct impact on animal health and indirect economic consequences. Clinically, these infections primarily manifest as enteric disorders, with outbreaks typically characterized by diarrhea, weight loss, and malabsorption syndromes that can culminate in runting-stunting syndrome (RSS) in young birds [1, 7]. In addition to the classical gastrointestinal signs, some avian rotavirus strains have been implicated in extraintestinal pathology. For instance, certain group A strains, notably those of genotype G18P[18], have been associated with hepatic necrosis in pigeons, a condition that leads to systemic infection and high morbidity in affected flocks [22, 24]. Such manifestations underscore the potential for avian rotaviruses to cause both localized and systemic disease, thereby complicating diagnosis and management in veterinary practice.

The underlying pathogenesis of these infections involves direct viral invasion of the intestinal epithelium, where viral replication induces cytolysis and inflammation, along with potential disruption of the gut barrier. This not only predisposes the host to secondary bacterial infections but may also facilitate interspecies transmission under conditions of intensive animal husbandry. Surveillance data recommended by international bodies such as the WHO and FAO emphasize the critical need for early and accurate diagnosis to mitigate the spread of these economically critical pathogens.

Coinfections in Avian Rotavirus Infections

Coinfections play a pivotal role in exacerbating the clinical severity of avian rotavirus infections. Studies employing multiplex RT–qPCR assays have revealed frequent coinfections involving other enteric viruses such as chicken astrovirus, avian nephritis virus, and avian orthoreovirus [1]. Notably, coinfection with chicken astrovirus has been linked with severe intestinal lesions and high mortality rates in broiler chickens, accentuating the impact of synergistic viral interactions on the host's immune response and overall performance [11]. The high prevalence of coinfections in flocks with poor performance efficiency indices (PEI) further highlights the complex interplay between avian rotaviruses and other viral enteric pathogens that often coexist within the same host and may complicate clinical outcomes [7].

In wild bird populations, the diversity of rotavirus genotypes adds an additional layer of complexity. Migratory birds have been identified as reservoirs for novel rotavirus strains, and the detection of genetically distinct rotavirus genotypes in species such as crows, gulls, and velvet scoters indicates both interspecies transmission and the potential for rotavirus evolution [3, 5, 6]. The co-circulation of multiple rotavirus groups (i.e., groups A, D, F, and G) in the same geographic regions raises concerns regarding genetic reassortment events. Such events not only contribute to enhanced pathogenicity but might also augment the risk of cross-species transmission, including potential zoonotic spillovers, a risk that is acknowledged by major public health organizations like the CDC and WOAH. Furthermore, mixed viral infections can exacerbate intestinal inflammation, disrupt nutrient absorption, and lead to compounded stress, thereby impairing growth and productivity across various avian species.

Management Strategies

Given the complex clinical presentations and the multifactorial nature of avian rotavirus infections, a multifaceted approach to management is essential. Primary strategies include robust diagnostic methodologies, stringent biosecurity measures, and targeted vaccination protocols. Advanced molecular diagnostic tools, such as the highly sensitive SYBR Green-based RT-qPCR for rotavirus detection [9], have been pivotal in the rapid and precise identification of viral genomes in field samples. These assays not only facilitate early detection but also enable quantification of viral loads, a critical parameter for assessing disease severity and guiding intervention strategies.

The use of multiplex RT–qPCR assays for simultaneous detection of several enteric viruses has been particularly valuable in settings where coinfection is common [1]. These tools allow for a comprehensive understanding of the viral landscape in a given flock, thereby informing treatment decisions and adjustments to management protocols. In addition, histopathological examinations remain an indispensable adjunct diagnostic tool, particularly in cases where clinical presentations are atypical, as seen in both gastrointestinal involvement and hepatic necrosis [31].

Vaccination represents a cornerstone of prevention, and recent advances in vaccinology have led to the development of multi-epitope peptide vaccine candidates specifically designed against emerging avian rotavirus strains [2]. These vaccine constructs, which include epitopes derived from key surface proteins VP4 and VP7, have been engineered using computational approaches to enhance immunogenicity while ensuring broad coverage of circulating strains. Combining such novel vaccine candidates with live attenuated vectors, like the recombinant Newcastle disease virus expressing rotavirus VP6 [29], holds promise for inducing robust mucosal and systemic immunity. This approach leverages the advantages of live vaccine platforms, including the induction of rapid immune responses, while potentially reducing viral shedding and transmission within high-density poultry operations.

Robust biosecurity protocols remain critical, especially in commercial settings where the high density of birds facilitates rapid viral spread. Prevention strategies must include strict sanitation, controlled access to poultry houses, and routine monitoring for enteric pathogens, following guidelines from the FAO and WOAH. Integrating these measures with vaccination programs can reduce the incidence of outbreaks and mitigate losses. Enhanced surveillance, particularly in regions with suboptimal performance indices, can further help in the early detection of coinfection scenarios and guide emergency responses aimed at containing viral spread.

The establishment of reverse genetics systems for avian rotaviruses has provided an invaluable platform for dissecting the molecular underpinnings of rotavirus pathogenicity and for the rational design of future therapeutics [4]. These systems facilitate the generation of recombinant strains that can be used to evaluate vaccine candidates, study viral protein functions, and even investigate virus-host interactions in controlled settings. Such experimental advances are crucial for understanding virulence factors and for predicting the potential for zoonotic transmission, which remains a pertinent concern given the reported instances of avian-to-mammal transmission [12].

In summary, the clinical implications of avian rotavirus infections are multifaceted and compounded by frequent coinfections that worsen disease severity. The integration of state-of-the-art molecular diagnostics, advanced vaccine technology, and rigorous biosecurity measures presents a comprehensive management strategy. These approaches, supported by guidelines from international health organizations, are essential for mitigating the global impact of avian rotaviruses on both animal health and the poultry industry.

References

[1] Loor-Giler A, Muslin C, Santander-Parra S, Coello D, Robayo-Chico M, Ferreira AP, et al.. Simultaneous detection and partial molecular characterization of five RNA viruses associated with enteric disease in chickens: chicken astrovirus, avian nephritis virus, infectious bronchitis virus, avian rotavirus a and avian orthoreovirus, via multiplex RT–qPCR. Frontiers in Veterinary Science. 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2025.1536420

[2] Hasan M, Ahmed S, Imranuzzaman M, Bari R, Roy S, Hasan M, et al.. Designing and development of efficient multi-epitope-based peptide vaccine candidate against emerging avian rotavirus strains: A vaccinomic approach. Journal of Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology. 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgeb.2024.100398

[3] Fujii Y, Masatani T, Nishiyama S, Takahashi T, Okajima M, Izumi F, et al.. Molecular characterization of an avian rotavirus a strain detected from a large-billed crow (Corvus macrorhynchos) in Japan.. Virology. 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.virol.2024.110114

[4] Kanda M, Fukuda S, Hamada N, Nishiyama S, Masatani T, Fujii Y, et al.. Establishment of a reverse genetics system for avian rotavirus A strain PO-13.. Journal of General Virology. 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1099/jgv.0.001760

[5] Fujii Y, Masatani T, Nishiyama S, Okajima M, Izumi F, Okazaki K, et al.. Molecular characterisation of a novel avian rotavirus A strain detected from a gull species (Larus sp.).. Journal of General Virology. 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1099/jgv.0.001792

[6] Fujii Y, Hirayama M, Nishiyama S, Takahashi T, Okajima M, Izumi F, et al.. Characterization of an avian rotavirus A strain isolated from a velvet scoter (Melanitta fusca): implication for the role of migratory birds in global spread of avian rotaviruses.. Journal of General Virology. 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1099/jgv.0.001722

[7] Gallego JC, Lorencena D, Mello JLd, Delai RR, Matos MRd, Viott AdM, et al.. Investigation of avian rotavirus infections in broiler chicks from commercial flocks with different performance efficiency indexes. Veterinary research communications. 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11259-022-09910-x

[8] Mase M, Suzuki T. Genetic Characterization of Avian Rotavirus A From Japanese Pigeons. Microbiology and immunology. 2026. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1348-0421.70062

[9] Torre DIDl, Astolfi-Ferreira C, Chacón RD, Ferreira AJP. Sensitive SYBR Green, Real Time PCR for the Detection and Quantitation of Avian Rotavirus A. Veterinary Sciences. 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci6010002

[10] Júnior JWBD, Chagas EHN, Serra ACS, Souto L, Júnior ETdP, Bandeira RS, et al.. Ocurrence of rotavirus and picobirnavirus in wild and exotic avian from amazon forest. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases. 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0008792

[11] Koo B, Lee H, Jeon E, Jang H, Han M, Mo I. An unusual case of concomitant infection with chicken astrovirus and group A avian rotavirus in broilers with a history of severe clinical signs. Journal of Veterinary Sciences. 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4142/jvs.2013.14.2.231

[12] Mori Y, Sugiyama M, Takayama M, Atoji Y, Masegi T, Minamoto N. Avian-to-mammal transmission of an avian rotavirus: analysis of its pathogenicity in a heterologous mouse model.. Virology. 2001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/VIRO.2001.1051

[13] Mitake H, Ito N, Okadera K, Okada K, Nakagawa K, Tanaka T, et al.. Detection of avian-like rotavirus A VP4 from a calf in Japan. Journal of Veterinary Medical Science. 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1292/jvms.14-0379

[14] Patzina-Mehling C, Falkenhagen A, Trojnar E, Gadicherla A, Johne R. Potential of avian and mammalian species A rotaviruses to reassort as explored by plasmid only-based reverse genetics.. Virus Research. 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.virusres.2020.198027

[15] Patzina-Mehling C, Falkenhagen A, Gadicherla A, Grützke J, Tausch SH, Johne R. Whole genome sequence analysis of cell culture-adapted rotavirus A strains from chicken.. Infection, Genetics and Evolution. 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meegid.2020.104275

[16] Rodríguez JM, Luque D. Structural Insights into Rotavirus Entry.. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology. 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14741-9_3

[17] Deol P, Kattoor JJ, Sircar S, Ghosh S, Bányai K, Dhama K, et al.. Avian Group D Rotaviruses: Structure, Epidemiology, Diagnosis, and Perspectives on Future Research Challenges. Pathogens. 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens6040053

[18] Sartalamacchia K, Veletanlic V, Diller JR, Ogden KM. Multiple rotavirus species encode fusion-associated small transmembrane (FAST) proteins with cell type-specific activity. Journal of Virology. 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1128/jvi.01587-25

[19] Veletanlic V, Sartalamacchia K, Diller JR, Ogden KM. Multiple rotavirus species encode fusion-associated small transmembrane (FAST) proteins with cell type-specific activity. bioRxiv. 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.04.07.536061

[20] Yaduvanshi S, Singh R, Bhattacharya A, Ikram M, Sircar S, Malik Y. Studies on Detection, Prevalence and Molecular Characterization of Avian Rotavirus. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences. 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v92i6.109903

[21] Vibin J, Chamings A, Klaassen M, Alexandersen S. Metagenomic characterisation of additional and novel avian viruses from Australian wild ducks. Scientific Reports. 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-79413-9

[22] McCowan C, Crameri S, Koçak A, Shan S, Fegan M, Forshaw D, et al.. A novel group A rotavirus associated with acute illness and hepatic necrosis in pigeons (Columba livia), in Australia. PLoS ONE. 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0203853

[23] Legrottaglie R, Rizzi V, Agrimi P. Isolation and identification of avian rotavirus from pheasant chicks with signs of clinical enteritis. Comparative Immunology, Microbiology & Infectious Diseases. 1997. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0147-9571(97)00005-2

[24] Blakey J, Crossley B, Rosenberger J, Rejmanek D, Markis M, Bickford A, et al.. Rotavirus A Associated with Clinical Disease and Hepatic Necrosis in California Pigeons (Columba livia domestica).. Avian diseases. 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1637/AVIANDISEASES-D-19-00114

[25] Deol P, Kattoor JJ, Sircar S, Batra M, Dhama K, Malik Y. Identification and In Silico Characterization of a Genetically Distinct Avian Rotavirus D Capsid Gene, VP7. Pathogens. 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens7020037

[26] Meßmer C, Rubbenstroth D, Mohr L, Peus E, Schreiber T, Rautenschlein S. Pigeon Rotavirus A as the cause of systemic infection in juvenile pigeons (young pigeon disease).. Tierarztliche Praxis. Ausgabe K, Kleintiere/Heimtiere. 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1909-2235

[27] Busi C, Martella V, Papetti A, Sabelli C, Lelli D, Alborali G, et al.. Group A Rotavirus Associated with Encephalitis in Red Fox. Emerging Infectious Diseases. 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3201/eid2309.170158

[28] Steger CL, Boudreaux CE, LaConte L, Pease J, McDonald SM. Group A Rotavirus VP1 Polymerase and VP2 Core Shell Proteins: Intergenotypic Sequence Variation and In Vitro Functional Compatibility. Journal of Virology. 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1128/JVI.01642-18

[29] Soliman RM, Nishioka K, Murakoshi F, Nakaya T. Use of live attenuated recombinant Newcastle disease virus carrying avian paramyxovirus 2 HN and F protein genes to enhance immune responses against species A rotavirus VP6 protein. Veterinary Research. 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13567-024-01271-4

[30] Skrobarczyk JW, Martin C, Bhatia SS, Pillai S, Berghman L. Electron-Beam Inactivation of Human Rotavirus (HRV) for the Production of Neutralizing Egg Yolk Antibodies. Frontiers in Immunology. 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2022.840077

[31] Gromov IN, Safonov DN, Levkina VA, Senchenkova AS. The role of histological examination in the diagnosis of avian viral respiratory and intestinal diseases. Agro-industrial complex: problems and prospects of development. 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22450/978-5-9642-0629-3-10-16