# Bacterial Contamination in Chicken Meat and Eggs: Pathogens, [Food Safety](/knowledge/bacteria/livestock-bacteria/cooking-chicken-bacteria-prevention), and Mitigation Strategies
## Key Takeaways
- *Salmonella enterica* (particularly Enteritidis and Typhimurium) and *Campylobacter jejuni/coli* are the predominant bacterial pathogens contaminating chicken meat and eggs, with *Salmonella* Enteritidis exhibiting a strong propensity for vertical transmission via ovary/oviduct colonization and biofilm formation.
- Transmission routes are multifaceted, encompassing vertical transfer from breeder flocks, horizontal spread through farm environments (litter, water, feed), and post-harvest contamination during processing, with eggshell penetration also a concern.
- Advanced diagnostic methods like real-time PCR (qPCR) and multiplex PCR offer rapid and sensitive detection of pathogens, complementing traditional culture-based methods, while EMA-qPCR can differentiate viable from dead cells for a more accurate infectious load assessment.
- Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a significant challenge, with high resistance rates observed in *Salmonella*, *E. coli*, and *S. aureus* to common antibiotics, necessitating careful monitoring and the development of alternative control strategies.
- Mitigation strategies are integrated across the production chain, including stringent biosecurity, vaccination programs for *Salmonella*, application of probiotics and competitive exclusion agents (e.g., *Lactobacillus* species, commensal *E. coli*), bacteriophage therapy, and the use of plant-derived antimicrobials.
- Chemical interventions such as electrolyzed water and organic acids are employed post-harvest to reduce pathogen loads on carcasses, complementing pre-harvest strategies to ensure food safety.
---
## Introduction
[Bacterial contamination of poultry](/knowledge/bacteria/avian-bacteria/bacterial-contamination-poultry-salmonella-e-coli) products, specifically chicken meat and eggs, represents a persistent challenge in veterinary public health and [food safety](/knowledge/bacteria/livestock-bacteria/cooking-chicken-bacteria-prevention). Poultry is a major reservoir for several foodborne pathogens, most notably nontyphoidal *Salmonella enterica* and *Campylobacter* species, as well as commensal organisms such as *Escherichia coli* and *Staphylococcus aureus* that can acquire pathogenic traits [1, 2]. The economic burden of foodborne illness linked to poultry consumption is substantial, and regulatory frameworks globally have focused on reducing pathogen carriage in flocks and contamination during processing.
This article provides a veterinary molecular and diagnostic perspective on the major bacterial pathogens contaminating chicken meat and eggs, their transmission dynamics, antimicrobial resistance patterns, detection methodologies, and evidence-based mitigation strategies. It draws exclusively on peer-reviewed literature and does not discuss human clinical management except where host range parallels are directly relevant.
## Major [Bacterial Pathogens in Poultry](/knowledge/bacteria/avian-bacteria/bacterial-pathogens-in-poultry-clinical-reference) Products
### Salmonella enterica
*Salmonella enterica* is the most frequently isolated bacterial pathogen from chicken meat and eggs globally [3, 4]. Among over 2,500 serovars, *Salmonella* Enteritidis and *Salmonella* Typhimurium predominate in poultry-associated foodborne outbreaks [3]. *Salmonella* Enteritidis has a particular propensity for egg contamination through vertical transmission, while *Salmonella* Typhimurium is more often associated with meat contamination [3, 5].
Median prevalence values of *Salmonella* in broiler chickens, raw chicken meat, and eggs are estimated at 40.5%, 30%, and 40% respectively, based on a global meta-analysis [3]. In specific regional surveys, contamination rates in raw chicken meat can exceed 48%, as demonstrated in a study from Iran where 29 of 60 raw chicken samples were culture-positive for *Salmonella* [6].
The pathogenicity of *Salmonella* in chickens is mediated by several virulence factors. *Salmonella* pathogenicity island 1 (SPI-1) encodes a type III secretion system (T3SS-1) that is expressed in the chicken intestine and promotes bacterial proliferation [7]. Although SPI-1 is not absolutely essential for colonization, mutants lacking T3SS-1 show reduced intestinal invasion and systemic spread [7]. Interestingly, even when all known invasion factors (T3SS-1, Rck, and PagN) are deleted, *Salmonella* Typhimurium can still colonize internal organs and invade many phagocytic and non-phagocytic cells in chicks, including epithelial and endothelial cells [8]. This redundancy complicates control strategies.
Biofilm formation further enhances *Salmonella* persistence. The genes *csgD* and *bcsA*, which regulate curli fimbriae and cellulose production respectively, promote vertical transmission of *Salmonella* Enteritidis in chickens [5]. In intraperitoneally infected laying hens, the wild-type strain yielded 24.7% bacteria-positive eggs, whereas the Δ*csgD* mutant produced only 2.1% positive eggs [5]. Similarly, the Δ*bcsA* mutant yielded 4.5% positive eggs, confirming that biofilm-associated genes facilitate egg contamination [5].
### Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli
*Campylobacter* species, particularly *C. jejuni* and *C. coli*, are major causes of foodborne enteritis and are commonly carried in the intestinal tract of poultry without causing clinical disease in the birds themselves [2]. These microaerophilic bacteria colonize the ceca and small intestine of broilers and layers, and contamination of meat occurs during slaughter and processing. Horizontal transmission from environmental sources such as contaminated water, feed, and litter is the primary route, although vertical transmission via trans-ovarian spread has been reported [2]. *Campylobacter hepaticus* is an emerging pathogen associated with spotty liver disease in layers, a condition previously termed avian vibrionic hepatitis [2].
### Escherichia coli
Avian pathogenic *E. coli* (APEC) strains cause [colibacillosis in poultry](/knowledge/bacteria/avian-bacteria/colibacillosis-in-poultry-escherichia-coli-infections-in-chickens), but non-pathogenic commensal *E. coli* are also abundant in the chicken gut [1, 9]. These commensal strains can serve as reservoirs of antimicrobial resistance genes. Multidrug-resistant *E. coli* has been isolated from chicken meat, eggs, and feces, with high resistance rates to amoxicillin and erythromycin [1]. Commensal *E. coli* can also modulate the fitness and virulence of *Salmonella*; transcriptomic analysis of co-cultures showed that a commensal *E. coli* strain downregulated *Salmonella* Heidelberg genes involved in growth, virulence, biofilm formation, and antimicrobial resistance by up to 86-fold [9, 10]. This finding suggests that the microbiome can be harnessed for pathogen control.
### Staphylococcus aureus
*Staphylococcus aureus* is a common contaminant of poultry meat and eggs, often originating from skin and handling. Methicillin-resistant *S. aureus* (MRSA) and multidrug-resistant strains have been detected in chicken products, with mecA and aac(3)-IV resistance genes identified [1]. *S. aureus* can cause bumblefoot and osteomyelitis in broilers, but its primary [food safety](/knowledge/bacteria/livestock-bacteria/cooking-chicken-bacteria-prevention) concern is enterotoxin production.
## Transmission Routes
### Vertical Transmission
Vertical transmission occurs when infected breeder flocks pass pathogens to eggs before oviposition. *Salmonella* Enteritidis is the archetypal vertically transmitted pathogen in poultry [5]. The bacterium colonizes the reproductive tract, particularly the ovary and oviduct, and is deposited inside the egg contents. Biofilm-forming ability enhances the efficiency of vertical transmission [5]. Heterogeneous antimicrobial resistance patterns have been documented in *Salmonella* Enteritidis strains transmitted from breeding chickens to commercial progeny, highlighting the persistence of resistant clones along the production chain.
### Horizontal Transmission
Horizontal transmission occurs via the farm environment, feed, water, litter, pests, and contaminated equipment [2]. *Campylobacter* is predominantly horizontally acquired, with wild birds, rodents, and insects acting as vectors [2]. Post-harvest contamination during slaughter, scalding, defeathering, evisceration, and chilling is a critical point for meat contamination. *Salmonella* can also penetrate eggshells after laying if the cuticle is damaged, although this route is less common than vertical deposition [11].
### Eggshell Penetration
Bacterial penetration of the eggshell is facilitated by the pores and the condition of the cuticle. *Salmonella* Typhimurium can penetrate the outer structures of chicken eggs, with the degree of penetration dependent on temperature and humidity [11]. Eggshell contamination is a concern for table eggs, especially when eggs are not properly cleaned or refrigerated.
## Detection Methods
### Culture-Based Methods
Conventional culture remains the gold standard for detection of *Salmonella* and *Campylobacter* in poultry products. For *Salmonella*, pre-enrichment in buffered peptone water followed by selective enrichment in Rappaport-Vassiliadis or tetrathionate broth, and plating on xylose lysine deoxycholate (XLD) agar or chromogenic media is standard [6]. Detection limits are around 1 CFU/g for artificially contaminated samples, but culture requires 3-5 days for definitive results.
### Real-Time PCR and Quantitative PCR
Real-time PCR (qPCR) offers rapid, sensitive detection and quantification. A TaqMan qPCR assay targeting a genomic deletion specific to *Salmonella* Pullorum achieved a detection limit of 5 copies/μL of plasmid and 4 CFU/μL of bacterial DNA [12]. This assay outperformed traditional culture and antibody detection in chicken samples, identifying over 80% of positive birds compared to less than 50% for culture [12]. An enhanced framework combining qPCR with antibody detection raised the detection rate to 92% [12].
For *Salmonella* Enteritidis, a real-time PCR targeting the *sdf* region has been validated for poultry meat and consumption eggs. Multiplex PCR assays allow simultaneous detection of multiple serovars. A 1-step multiplex PCR can differentiate *S.* Enteritidis, *S.* Pullorum, *S.* Typhimurium, and *S.* Infantis in poultry-associated samples. Insulated isothermal PCR (iiPCR) has also been developed for field detection of *Salmonella* in chicken meat.
Ethidium monoazide (EMA) real-time PCR discriminates viable from dead cells by binding to DNA of membrane-compromised cells, providing a more reliable estimate of infectious load.
### Advanced Biosensors
Novel biosensor platforms combine PCR with nanotechnology. A PCR-enhanced upconversion nanoparticles-WS2 fluorescence biosensor with dual quenching-dual recovery mechanism has been reported for *Salmonella* Typhimurium detection. Such sensors offer rapid, sensitive detection without complex instrumentation, though they are not yet widely implemented in veterinary diagnostics.
### Serological Methods
Blocking ELISA for detecting antibodies against *Salmonella* Enteritidis in chicken sera provides a flock-level screening tool. However, serology cannot distinguish current infection from past exposure, and sensitivity is lower than direct pathogen detection.
## Antimicrobial Resistance
Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in poultry-associated bacteria is a critical concern [1, 3, 4]. The highest resistance levels in *Salmonella* isolates from the poultry production chain are observed for nalidixic acid and ampicillin [3]. Tetracycline and erythromycin resistance are common in *E. coli* and *S. aureus* from chicken meat and eggs [1]. Plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance genes (*qnrA*, *qnrB*, *qnrS*) have been detected in *Salmonella* from chicken meat; a study in Iran found *qnrS* in 86.2% of isolates [6].
Whole genome sequencing (WGS) has been used to track multi-country outbreaks of *Salmonella* Enteritidis and to characterize resistance determinants. Comparative genomic analysis can identify differences in survival ability, such as those observed among *Salmonella* Enteritidis strains in egg whites. The *rfbH* gene involved in lipopolysaccharide biosynthesis is essential for survival in egg albumen.
Multidrug resistance (MDR) is defined as resistance to three or more antimicrobial classes. High MDR rates have been reported in *Salmonella*, *E. coli*, and *S. aureus* from poultry in Bangladesh, with resistance genes *sul1*, *tetB*, *aadA1*, and *blaSHV* commonly detected [1]. In Brazil, MDR is particularly associated with *Salmonella* Heidelberg and Minnesota lineages [4].
## Mitigation Strategies
### Biosecurity and Farm Management
Strict biosecurity is the first line of defense. Measures include decontamination of housing between flocks, preventing entry of rodents, wild birds, and insects, and controlling feed and water quality [2, 13]. Organic poultry production faces additional challenges because restrictions on antimicrobial use necessitate alternative approaches [13].
### Vaccination
Vaccination of laying hens and breeders reduces *Salmonella* carriage and shedding. In Australia, a live attenuated *Salmonella* Typhimurium vaccine administered via oral gavage, drinking water, and intramuscular injection, with an additional booster at 15 weeks, significantly reduced fecal shedding after challenge with wild-type *Salmonella* Typhimurium [14]. Vaccinated birds showed higher *Salmonella*-specific group B antibodies and lower bacterial loads in organs [14].
Cross-reactive immunity between serovars has been documented. Chickens primed with *S.* Typhimurium show protection against heterologous *S.* Enteritidis challenge. Age at primary infection influences persistence and subsequent immunity; infection at a younger age leads to longer carriage.
Subunit vaccines targeting SPI-1 proteins have been evaluated. SPI-1 proteins induced protection against *S.* Enteritidis challenge in chickens. Chitosan nanoparticle-based oral delivery of *Salmonella* antigens elicits both innate and adaptive immune responses in broilers.
### Probiotics and Competitive Exclusion
Probiotic strains, particularly *Lactobacillus* species, can inhibit *Salmonella* colonization. *Lactobacillus bulgaricus*, *L. rhamnosus*, and *L. paracasei* attenuate *Salmonella* Enteritidis, Heidelberg, and Typhimurium colonization and downregulate virulence gene expression in vitro. *Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus* GG supplementation reduces *Salmonella* load and modulates intestinal morphology, gut microbiota, and immune responses in chickens.
Commensal *E. coli* also exerts a competitive exclusion effect. Transcriptomic studies reveal that co-culture with commensal *E. coli* downregulates *Salmonella* Heidelberg genes involved in growth, virulence, biofilm formation, and AMR by up to 86-fold [9, 10]. This suggests that carefully selected commensal strains could be used as probiotics to reduce *Salmonella* persistence.
### Bacteriophage Therapy
Bacteriophages offer a targeted approach to reduce *Salmonella* contamination. A multiphage cocktail applied to chicken breast meat and shell eggs significantly reduced *Salmonella* Enteritidis counts post-harvest [15]. Similarly, a phage cocktail applied to food and food-contact surfaces effectively controlled *Salmonella*. A broad-spectrum single phage was effective against *Salmonella* in contaminated eggs, though resistance development occurred. Phage ΦSP-1, isolated from broiler intestinal content, is lytic against multiple *Salmonella* serovars. Phage therapy can be integrated with other interventions.
### Plant-Derived Antimicrobials
Plant-derived compounds such as carvacrol, thymol, trans-cinnamaldehyde, and caprylic acid have shown efficacy against *Salmonella* in poultry. Caprylic acid supplementation in feed reduces *Salmonella* Enteritidis colonization in commercial broiler chicks. Plant-derived antimicrobials can be used as feed additives to improve the safety of poultry products.
### Egg Yolk Antibodies
Hyperimmunized egg yolk powder containing specific antibodies (IgY) has been evaluated for passive immunotherapy. Nonimmunized egg yolk powder supplemented feed also showed some efficacy against *Salmonella* Enteritidis in broilers, possibly through nutritional effects. Against *Campylobacter jejuni*, hyperimmunized egg yolk powder reduced intestinal colonization in chickens.
### Chemical Interventions
Electrolyzed water applied to poultry carcasses reduces *Salmonella* Typhimurium loads on meat [16]. Other chemical disinfectants used in processing include organic acids, chlorine dioxide, and peracetic acid, though these must be applied at concentrations that do not affect meat quality.
## Integrated Control Framework
The following Mermaid diagram illustrates an integrated workflow from farm to table, combining detection and mitigation strategies.
```mermaid
flowchart TD
A["Flock Monitoring"] --> B["Sample Collection: Feces, Feed, Water, Dust"]
B --> C{"Diagnostic Testing"}
C --> D["Culture"]
C --> E["qPCR / Multiplex PCR"]
C --> F["ELISA / Serology"]
D --> G["Identification & Serotyping"]
E --> G
F --> H["Flock Serostatus"]
G --> I{"Positive?"}
I -- Yes --> J["Intervention Selection"]
J --> K["Vaccination"]
J --> L["Probiotics / Competitive Exclusion"]
J --> M["Phage Therapy"]
J --> N["Plant-Derived Antimicrobials"]
J --> O["Biosecurity Enhancement"]
K --> P["Reduced Shedding"]
L --> P
M --> P
N --> P
O --> P
P --> Q["Pre-Harvest Testing"]
Q --> R{"Clear?"}
R -- Yes --> S["Processing / Slaughter"]
R -- No --> J
S --> T["Post-Harvest Interventions"]
T --> U["Electrolyzed Water / Chemical Wash"]
T --> V["Phage Spray"]
U --> W["Final Product Testing"]
V --> W
W --> X{"Acceptable?"}
X -- Yes --> Y["Retail / Consumption"]
X -- No --> Z["Reroute to Cooking / Destruction"]
```
## Conclusions
[Bacterial contamination of chicken meat](/knowledge/bacteria/avian-bacteria/bacterial-contamination-chicken-meat-salmonella-campylobacter-food-safety) and eggs remains a multifaceted problem requiring integrated control measures across the production continuum. *Salmonella* Enteritidis and *Campylobacter jejuni* are the pathogens of greatest concern, with antimicrobial resistance further complicating control. Advances in molecular diagnostics, including multiplex PCR, TaqMan qPCR, and isothermal amplification, provide rapid and sensitive detection essential for surveillance. Mitigation strategies ranging from vaccination and probiotics to phage therapy and plant-derived antimicrobials offer alternatives to conventional antibiotics. Continued research into host-pathogen interactions, biofilm biology, and microbiome modulation will underpin future interventions.
## Related Clinical & Scientific Guides
* [Duck Diseases: A Comprehensive Overview for Veterinary Practitioners](/knowledge/bacteria/general/duck-diseases-comprehensive-overview-veterinary)
* [Salmonella Dublin in Cattle: Emerging Pathogen, Diagnostic Challenges, and Public Health Impact](/knowledge/bacteria/general/salmonella-dublin-cattle-emerging-pathogen-diagnostic-public-health)
* [Mycoplasma Infections in Poultry: Vaccination Strategies and Control Programs](/knowledge/bacteria/general/mycoplasma-infections-in-poultry-vaccination-strategies-and-control-programs)
## References
[1] Rafiq K, Sani A, Hossain MT, et al. Assessment of the presence of multidrug-resistant Escherichia coli, Salmonella and Staphylococcus in chicken meat, eggs and faeces in Mymensingh division of Bangladesh. Heliyon. 2024. URL: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a860be9ba15be5d478993ea39cbf7d5b98ae8fad
[2] Sadek SAS, Shaapan R, Barakat A. Campylobacteriosis in Poultry: A Review. The Journal of World's Poultry Research. 2023. URL: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/71d210d936ab602c86bd78f437726e2974a704ef
[3] Castro-Vargas R, Herrera-Sánchez M, Rodríguez-Hernández R, et al. Antibiotic resistance in Salmonella spp. isolated from poultry: A global overview. Veterinary World. 2020. URL: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2606289c68f2f6f009d108a715ffff8d7c86ada2
[4] Kipper D, Mascitti A, De Carli S, et al. Emergence, Dissemination and Antimicrobial Resistance of the Main Poultry-Associated Salmonella Serovars in Brazil. Veterinary Sciences. 2022. URL: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/98290783d8b62b6c6e85ae5fdc9405e8caaf2cd7
[5] Chen S, Feng Z, Sun H, et al. Biofilm-Formation-Related Genes csgD and bcsA Promote the Vertical Transmission of Salmonella Enteritidis in Chicken. Frontiers in Veterinary Science. 2021. URL: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3cdf197d8edc0b1487673d7f0e4708392c46396d
[6] Forouhar M, Harzandi N. Molecular Survey of Quinolone Resistance in Salmonella spp. Isolated From Poultry Products in Karaj, Iran. International Journal of Enteric Pathogens. 2019. URL: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4f6ce9f4f0c78ff8df90ec6871837e30519b7569
[7] Eade CR, Bogomolnaya L, et al. Salmonella Pathogenicity Island 1 Is Expressed in the Chicken Intestine and Promotes Bacterial Proliferation. Infection and Immunity. 2018. URL: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/59c4374eabbff139d7ad9387eef0c83a110934a0
[8] Roche SM, Holbert S, Vern YL, et al. A large panel of chicken cells are invaded in vivo by Salmonella Typhimurium even when depleted of all known invasion factors. bioRxiv. 2020. URL: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/de806abe87f8cf406271f847d66a02a53b1cb8be
[9] Khan Y, Edison L, Denagamage T, et al. Commensal Escherichia coli inhibits the growth and modulates the fitness, virulence, and antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella Heidelberg in vitro. Microbiology Spectrum. 2025. URL: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/99d7b8383eb4be6b3f4ae3f6c245440d7d48d677
[10] Khan Y, Edison L, Denagamage T, et al. Exploring Transcriptomic Changes in Antibiotic-Resistant Salmonella Heidelberg Modulated by Commensal Escherichia coli in Vitro. bioRxiv. 2024. URL: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/237dc04be7749b9ad3e7717a75152b2b35d8e8ff
[11] Williams J, Dillard L, Hall GO. The penetration patterns of Salmonella typhimurium through the outer structures of chicken eggs. Avian Diseases. 1968. URL: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ebaa0c60a741c3c11df041380bbbb681405a548f
[12] Wang H, Kang X, Yu L, et al. Developing a novel TaqMan qPCR assay for optimizing Salmonella Pullorum detection in chickens. Veterinary Quarterly. 2025. URL: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/46eac95a8b69cebfe8bf1ab4868afb22f963ff5c
[13] Arsi K, Donoghue D, Venkitanarayanan K, et al. Reducing Foodborne Pathogens in Organic Poultry: Challenges and Opportunities. [Food Safety in Poultry Meat](/knowledge/bacteria/avian-bacteria/poultry-meat-food-safety-cooking-bacteria) Production. 2019. URL: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/dad7e98d79d935180268f6513d5fd794abbbf6b4
[14] Khan S, McWhorter AR, Andrews DM, et al. An enhanced vaccination regime reduces the shedding of Salmonella Typhimurium from layer chickens. Vaccine. 2025. URL: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/84e3acc7728b680aaa59982c2f928b69c5fd2293
[15] Kokab A, Shekh A, Rabbani M, et al. Post-harvest biocontrol of Salmonella Enteritidis on Chicken breast meat and Shell eggs using multiphage cocktail. Veterinaria Italiana. 2023. URL: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/102999ed76029a569d922d0f264fc72dbf7c2910
[16] Çilipikçioğlu G, Demirel Y, Şireli U, et al. Inactivation of Salmonella Typhimurium on poultry meat by electrolyzed water. 2012. URL: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f672d36125f27f821679126067473e98e936b7b4
[17] Sudjadi. Analysis of Salmonella enteritidis in chicken meat and egg by real time-polymerase chain reaction. 2017. URL: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e58f066a718bfd28f8e2f79a7016ac662fbbb6a6
[18] Barac D, Abdel-Mawgood A, Awad S, et al. Multiplex PCR-based genotyping of Salmonella Enteritidis and Salmonella Typhimurium from food sources and assessment of their antimicrobial resistance profiles in Egypt. Molecular Biology Reports. 2024. URL: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d4f79c49c8874f0c93a9f7481bc9204cf880a0c7
[19] Hilbert F, Smulders F, Chopra-Dewasthaly R, et al. Salmonella in the wildlife-human interface. 2012. URL: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/55fb6f96caacf0a11f33afc8dc1362b22c7ab6e3
[20] Barbour EK, Nabbut NH. Isolation of salmonella and some other potential pathogens from two chicken breeding farms in Saudi Arabia. 1982. URL: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4910d568c3d0ca5b506fe0528cfe6a8ce5576c10
[21] Ni P, Xu Q, Yin Y, et al. Prevalence and characterization of Salmonella serovars isolated from farm products in Shanghai. 2018. URL: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1aa89905b728edaac264386376189b3aa0965af8
[22] Clayton DJ. Analysis of the role of fimbriae in the virulence of Salmonella enterica in poultry. 2008. URL: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2a0e2c