# [Pig Feed Storage](/knowledge/animal-farming/swine/pig-feed-storage-and-mycotoxin-prevention) and Inventory Management


## Key Takeaways

- **Storage infrastructure and environmental control are paramount for feed integrity:** Moisture-sealed bins, cool interior temperatures (ideally below 15°C), and isolation from livestock housing are critical to prevent fungal proliferation and subsequent mycotoxin formation, which can lead to reduced feed intake, immunosuppression, and impaired liver function.
- **Integrated pest management is essential for biosecurity and feed quality:** Rodents and insects act as vectors for pathogens and can initiate structural damage that permits moisture ingress, accelerating spoilage and mycotoxin contamination; exclusion barriers, routine inspection logs, and sanitation are key control measures.
- **Systematic spoilage and mycotoxin checks are vital for early detection:** Organoleptic evaluation (visual and olfactory assessment) should be supplemented with targeted laboratory sampling, especially after wet events or when feed is stored beyond recommended periods, to identify mycotoxins like aflatoxin, DON, zearalenone, and fumonisin.
- **Rigorous supplier documentation and inventory management ensure traceability and quality:** Maintaining records of origin certificates, ingredient declarations, delivery dates, lot numbers, and expiry dates, coupled with strict first-in-first-out (FIFO) rotation, allows for rapid response to quality deviations and minimizes feed degradation.
- **Feed quality directly impacts herd health and production efficiency:** Nutrient degradation and mycotoxin contamination compromise immune function, reduce growth rates, impair reproductive performance, and increase susceptibility to enteric diseases, necessitating proactive storage management as a core biosecurity and production function.

---

Pig feed storage and inventory management directly determine the nutritional quality and safety of feed delivered to growing and finishing pigs. Inadequate storage practices degrade feed value through moisture ingress, temperature fluctuation, and pest activity, and they also create conditions for mycotoxin formation that reduces feed intake, compromises immune function, and lowers carcass yield. A management framework anchored on facility planning, environmental monitoring, pest exclusion, scheduled spoilage checks, complete supplier documentation, and systematic inventory records provides the operational control needed to preserve feed integrity from delivery through the last feeding.

### At a Glance

| Management Area | Core Requirements | Primary Reference Source |
|---|---|---|
| **Storage infrastructure** | Moisture-sealed bins, cool interior, isolation from livestock housing | FAO Animal Production and Health |
| **Environmental monitoring** | Temperature, relative humidity, condensation checks | Merck Veterinary Manual |
| **Rodent and insect control** | Exclusion barriers, bait stations, routine inspection logs | WOAH Terrestrial Animal Health Code |
| **Spoilage and mycotoxin checks** | Organoleptic evaluation, targeted sampling after wet events | Mycotoxin contamination of the feed supply chain (Scopus 84858298089) |
| **Supplier documentation** | Origin certificates, ingredient declarations, delivery dates | USDA APHIS Livestock and Poultry Disease |
| **Inventory records** | Lot numbers, expiry dates, first-in-first-out rotation | USDA National Animal Health Monitoring System |

### System Context and Rationale for Structured Feed Management

Feed is the largest variable cost in pig production, and its quality directly shapes growth rate, [feed conversion ratio](/knowledge/animal-farming/poultry/feed-conversion-ratio-measuring-improving-poultry-efficiency), and carcass composition. The interaction between storage conditions and feed quality is well documented: moisture levels above 13 to 14 percent in stored grain and compounded feed promote fungal proliferation and subsequent mycotoxin production (Merck Veterinary Manual). The most consequential mycotoxins in swine production,aflatoxin, deoxynivalenol (DON), zearalenone, and fumonisin,are associated with reduced voluntary feed intake, impaired liver function, reproductive disruption, and immunosuppression (Mycotoxin contamination of the feed supply chain, Scopus 84858298089). Because mycotoxin contamination can occur before feed reaches the farm, storage management serves as the primary on-site control point.

The regulatory context for feed storage is established through international animal health standards. The Terrestrial Animal Health Code (WOAH) outlines biosecurity principles that apply to feed handling areas, including separation of feed storage from animal housing and exclusion of vermin. The USDA National Animal Health Monitoring System (NAHMS) collects data on on-farm feed management practices, providing a baseline for evaluating industry adoption of storage protocols. These standards and surveillance systems underscore that feed storage is not a peripheral task but a core biosecurity and production function.

#### Feed Storage and Herd Health Interactions

The relationship between feed quality and pig health is bidirectional. Nutrient degradation in stored feed,particularly oxidation of unsaturated fats and loss of heat-labile vitamins,reduces the precision of ration formulation and can lead to marginal deficiencies that manifest as poor growth or increased susceptibility to enteric disease. Conversely, subclinical mycotoxin exposure, even at concentrations below visible spoilage thresholds, can suppress vaccine response and alter gut barrier function (Mycotoxin contamination of the feed supply chain, Scopus 84858298089). Storage management therefore supports veterinary preventive health programs directly.

### Planning Decisions for Storage Infrastructure

Storage system design begins with an assessment of feed type, consumption volume, delivery frequency, and climatic conditions. The FAO Animal Production and Health resources emphasize that storage structures must exclude moisture, provide ventilation to prevent condensation, and allow complete cleaning between feed lots. Facilities that receive feed in bulk require sealed silos with screened vents and access hatches that permit internal inspection. Bagged feed storage demands palletized, off-floor arrangement in a dedicated room with controlled access and documented cleaning schedules.

#### Facility Design and Environmental Control

Temperature and moisture are the two variables that most strongly influence feed deterioration rate. Storage areas should be located away from heat sources, direct sunlight, and livestock housing to reduce thermal transfer. Concrete or metal silos with reflective exteriors reduce solar heat gain. Interior walls and floors must be smooth, nonabsorbent, and free of cracks that harbor insects or moisture. Ventilation design should prevent condensation on interior surfaces, as localized wetting accelerates mold growth even when bulk moisture content remains acceptable. The USDA Livestock and Poultry Disease guidelines recommend that feed storage areas be included in the facility biosecurity plan with designated clean and dirty zones.

Capacity planning must account for feed turnover rate. Prolonged storage increases the risk of quality decline, particularly for pelleted or ground feed that has a larger surface area exposed to oxidative and hydrolytic reactions. Producers should size storage to allow complete consumption of each feed delivery within two to four weeks during warm months and four to six weeks during cooler periods, adjusting for local humidity conditions. Inventory management software or manual lot-tracking systems enable adherence to first-in-first-out (FIFO) rotation.

### Core Management Framework

The operational core of feed storage management rests on five interconnected activities: maintaining storage integrity, executing pest control, performing spoilage checks, documenting supplier information, and managing inventory records. Each activity has defined procedures and documentation requirements that support both production efficiency and animal health assurance.

#### Storage Integrity and Spoilage Checks

Daily visual inspection of storage structures for signs of moisture entry, condensation, or structural damage constitutes the first line of defense. Any feed that shows visible mold, caking, discoloration, heating, or off-odor must be isolated immediately and assessed for mycotoxin risk. The Merck Veterinary Manual advises that organoleptic evaluation be supplemented with targeted laboratory testing when wetting events occur or when feed has been stored beyond the recommended period. Producers should maintain a log that records date, storage conditions, inspection findings, and disposition of any rejected feed. Escalation to a [veterinary nutritionist](/blog/careers/becoming-a-veterinary-nutritionist-education-certification-and-practice) or diagnostic laboratory is indicated when multiple pigs in a barn exhibit reduced feed intake, vomiting, or unexplained performance decline, as these signs may precede detection of visible spoilage.

#### Pest Control and Biosecurity Integration

Rodents and insects are also nuisances, they vector pathogens, consume feed, and initiate structural damage that permits moisture entry. The WOAH Terrestrial Animal Health Code specifies that feed stores must be constructed and maintained to prevent wildlife and domestic animal access. An integrated pest management plan should include exclusion (sealed entry points, self-closing doors), sanitation (prompt cleanup of spilled feed, removal of harborage), and monitoring (bait stations placed along perimeter walls and recorded at least weekly). Rodenticides and insecticides must be used according to label directions and stored separately from feed to prevent contamination. Professional escalation to a licensed pest control operator is warranted when trapping or baiting records show persistent activity despite sanitation improvements.

#### Supplier Documentation and Inventory Records

The feed supply chain includes multiple points of potential quality compromise. Supplier documentation,origin certificates, ingredient declarations, nutrient analyses, delivery dates, and lot numbers,allows producers to trace quality issues to their source. The USDA National Animal Health Monitoring System data collection framework demonstrates that farms with complete feed records respond more rapidly to quality deviations and demonstrate greater compliance with Good Manufacturing Practices. Inventory records should document lot receipt, storage location, quantity, date of first use, and date of depletion. Periodic reconciliation of physical inventory against records identifies discrepancies that may indicate theft, spoilage, or record errors requiring investigation. Escalation to feed suppliers or regulatory authorities is necessary when documentation discrepancies involve mycotoxin test results, drug residues, or prohibited ingredients.

## Storage Facility Design and Environmental Control

The physical storage environment directly determines the rate and severity of feed quality deterioration. Moisture migration within stored grain and processed feed creates localized conditions that favor microbial growth. Facilities should provide consistent temperature control, as thermal cycling promotes condensation on bin walls and feed surfaces. The [FAO Animal Production and Health](https://www.fao.org/animal-production/en/) guidelines emphasize that feed storage areas must be dry, well ventilated, and protected from direct sunlight to limit oxidative rancidity. [Merck Veterinary Manual](https://www.merckvetmanual.com/) notes that relative humidity above 70 percent in storage spaces accelerates mold proliferation and mycotoxin production. Producers should measure and record temperature and humidity at multiple points within bulk bins and bagged feed storage rooms. Uncertainty remains regarding optimal temperature thresholds for different feed formulations, professional consultation with a feed technologist is recommended when establishing facility-specific limits.

## Pest Control and Biosecurity

Rodents, insects, and birds are vectors for pathogen introduction and physical contamination of feed. [USDA APHIS Livestock and Poultry Disease](https://www.aphis.usda.gov/livestock-poultry-disease) resources identify rodents as primary reservoirs for Salmonella and other enteric pathogens that can be transmitted through contaminated feed. An integrated pest management program should include exclusion measures such as sealing entry points, installing screens on ventilation openings, and maintaining a vegetation-free perimeter. Trapping and monitoring stations placed at regular intervals around storage structures provide objective data on pest pressure. A study on mycotoxin contamination of the feed supply chain ([Mycotoxin contamination of the feed supply chain, 2012](https://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/84858298089)) demonstrated that insect infestation during storage elevates mycotoxin levels because insect damage creates entry points for fungal spores. Regular inspection schedules and immediate response to pest sightings reduce the likelihood of widespread contamination. Professional pest control operators should be contracted when populations exceed manageable levels.

## Spoilage Checks and Mycotoxin Monitoring

Spoilage manifests as visible mold, off odors, caking, or discoloration. However, mycotoxins may be present without obvious signs. The [PubMed record 42424776](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42424776/) investigation into [swine feed storage](/knowledge/animal-farming/swine/swine-feed-storage-and-mycotoxin-management) quality found that aflatoxin and fumonisin contamination occurred even in feed that appeared visually acceptable. Routine testing programs should include representative sampling from multiple locations within each batch, as mycotoxin distribution is often heterogeneous. In-house rapid testing kits can screen for total aflatoxins, but confirmatory laboratory analysis using liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry is necessary for species specific quantification. [PubMed record 42143966](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42143966/) research on feed management practices emphasized that sampling protocols must account for particle size segregation during handling. Producers should maintain a log of all test results and consult a veterinary nutritionist when mycotoxin levels approach advisory limits. The [FAO Animal Production and Health](https://www.fao.org/animal-production/en/) resource advises that feed exceeding recommended mycotoxin thresholds should be blended only under professional guidance or diverted to non sensitive animal categories.

## Inventory Management and Rotation

Effective inventory control depends on accurate recording of feed arrival dates, batch numbers, and estimated usage rates. The first in first out (FIFO) principle minimizes storage time and reduces the risk of spoilage. A study on feed security and animal productivity ([Mycotoxin contamination of the feed supply chain, 2012](https://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/84858298089)) highlighted that improper rotation was a leading contributor to moldy feed in commercial swine operations. Inventory records should be reconciled with feeding schedules weekly. Digital systems that integrate bar code scanning or radio frequency identification tags improve accuracy and allow real time tracking of batch locations. Uncertainty exists regarding the shelf life of pelleted versus mash feed, professional agronomic advice should be sought for specific formulations with added enzymes or probiotics that may have shorter stability.

## Supplier Documentation and Traceability

Documentation from feed mills and ingredient suppliers provides the foundation for traceability in the event of a contamination incident. Quality certificates should specify mycotoxin levels, inclusion of antimicrobials or heavy metals, and nutritional analysis. [WOAH Terrestrial Animal Health Code](https://www.woah.org/en/what-we-do/standards/codes-and-manuals/terrestrial-code-online-access/) outlines expectations for feed safety traceability within the livestock production chain. Producers must retain these records for at least the duration of the production cycle plus a period consistent with regulatory requirements. A sample of each feed delivery should be archived in a sealed container for potential future testing. If a health problem arises, archived samples can be used to rule out or implicate feed as the cause. Professional veterinary involvement is necessary when interpreting feed test results in the context of clinical disease.

## Feed Records and Production Stage Decisions

Feed records linking batch numbers to specific groups of pigs enable assessment of the impact of feed quality on growth performance and health. [PubMed record 42112233](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42112233/) research on swine feeding programs demonstrated that records of feed intake and conversion rates help identify when feed quality deviations affect production. Storage decisions also vary by production stage. Weaner pig feed with high levels of milk products is more susceptible to moisture absorption and rancidity than grower finisher diets. [Merck Veterinary Manual](https://www.merckvetmanual.com/) advises that feed intended for gestating sows or young piglets should be stored for shorter durations due to higher fat content. Nutritionally complete feeds and medicated premises require careful inventory management to avoid cross contamination between batches.

## Nutrition and Water Considerations

Water quality interacts with feed storage in indirect ways. High mineral content or microbial contamination in water used for feed mixing can introduce spoilage organisms into the feed. The [FAO Animal Production and Health](https://www.fao.org/animal-production/en/) guidelines on feed preparation recommend using potable water and cleaning mixing equipment between batches. Feeders that allow moisture ingress from pig drinking activity can become sites for mold growth and should be inspected daily.

## Animal Welfare and Worker Safety

Feed spoilage directly compromises pig welfare. Mycotoxins cause reduced feed intake, vomiting, immunosuppression, and reproductive disorders. [WOAH Terrestrial Animal Health Code](https://www.woah.org/en/what-we-do/standards/codes-and-manuals/terrestrial-code-online-access/) standards emphasize that feed must be free of contaminants that could cause unnecessary pain or distress. Worker safety during feed handling requires protection from organic dusts that may carry mycotoxins or endotoxins. [USDA APHIS Livestock and Poultry Disease](https://www.aphis.usda.gov/livestock-poultry-disease) resources recommend use of respirators when handling moldy feed and when cleaning storage structures. Dust control measures such as wet sweeping and local exhaust ventilation reduce airborne particle concentrations.

## Failure Patterns and Practical Monitoring

Common failure patterns in pig feed storage include moisture infiltration due to roof leaks or condensation, pest infestation that goes undetected until advanced stages, and inventory errors that result in feed being stored beyond its usable life. Practical monitoring combines visual inspection with automated systems. Temperature monitoring cables in bulk bins detect heating caused by microbial activity. Carbon dioxide sensors can identify early stage spoilage in stored grain. A study on [precision livestock farming technologies](/knowledge/animal-farming/farm-management/precision-livestock-farming-technologies-a-decision-framework-for-adoption) ([Precision Livestock Farming technologies, 2022](https://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/85121598355)) noted that sensor based monitoring is becoming more accessible, but validation under commercial farm conditions remains limited. Producers should train staff to recognize signs of spoilage and maintain a log of monitoring observations. When failures are identified, immediate isolation of affected feed and professional evaluation of the entire storage system are necessary to prevent recurrence.

### Feed Storage and Pig Health: Biosecurity, Monitoring, and Sustainability

Maintaining feed storage integrity directly influences herd health, production efficiency, and environmental outcomes. Systematic observation of pigs for clinical signs linked to feed quality, rigorous biosecurity protocols, timely diagnostic intervention, and sustainable inventory practices are essential components of a comprehensive management program.

#### Health Observation

Feed-borne contaminants such as mycotoxins, molds, and bacterial pathogens can trigger subclinical or acute disease. Common clinical signs include reduced feed intake, vomiting, diarrhea, poor growth rates, reproductive disturbances, and immunosuppression. The Merck Veterinary Manual recommends that any unexplained decline in performance or increase in morbidity should prompt a review of feed storage conditions and a mycotoxin screening of representative samples. The document [Mycotoxin contamination of the feed supply chain: Implications for animal productivity and feed security](https://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/84858298089) emphasizes that mycotoxin levels below regulatory thresholds can still impair immunity and organ function. Therefore, routine observation of feeding behavior, fecal consistency, and mortality patterns is necessary. Keep daily records of feed consumption per pen and note deviations that coincide with a new batch or feedlot.

#### Biosecurity for Feed Storage

Biosecurity extends to the feed storage area to prevent introduction and spread of pathogens. The [WOAH Terrestrial Animal Health Code](https://www.woah.org/en/what-we-do/standards/codes-and-manuals/terrestrial-code-online-access/) outlines principles for limiting contamination of feed through rodent and bird exclusion, regular cleaning of bins and conveyors, and separation of raw ingredients from finished feed. Rodents and birds carry Salmonella, Escherichia coli, and other diseases that can contaminate stored feed. The [USDA APHIS Livestock and Poultry Disease](https://www.aphis.usda.gov/livestock-poultry-disease) resources recommend implementing an integrated pest management plan that includes sealing entry points, using traps and bait stations, and maintaining a clean perimeter. Feed storage bins should be located away from animal housing to reduce aerosol contamination and should be inspected weekly for signs of moisture, pests, or mold. Personnel handling feed should use dedicated footwear or footbaths when moving between storage and pig units.

#### Diagnostic and Veterinary Escalation

When health problems are suspected to originate from feed, diagnostic investigation should follow established protocols. Collect representative feed samples from multiple locations within the storage bin (surface, middle, bottom) and submit them to a laboratory for mycotoxin analysis, [bacterial culture](/blog/guides/bacterial-culture), or nutritional assay. The [PubMed record 42143966](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42143966/) underscores the importance of sampling methodology given the heterogeneous distribution of contaminants. Clinical signs such as jaundice, hemorrhagic diarrhea, or sudden death warrant immediate veterinary consultation. A veterinarian can help interpret laboratory results, rule out other causes, and recommend corrective measures such as adding binders, removing contaminated feed, or adjusting treatment protocols. Escalation should also occur when multiple pigs across different age groups exhibit similar signs, indicating a common feed source.

#### Uncertainty and Professional Interpretation

Feed quality assessment involves inherent uncertainty. Mycotoxin detection methods vary in sensitivity, and low-level contamination may go undetected. Toxin interactions can produce additive or synergistic effects not predicted by individual mycotoxin limits. Environmental factors such as temperature and humidity fluctuations during storage can alter mold growth dynamics unpredictably. Therefore, any laboratory result should be interpreted by a qualified nutritionist or veterinarian in the context of herd history, clinical signs, and production data. The [FAO Animal Production and Health](https://www.fao.org/animal-production/en/) guidelines advise maintaining a risk-based approach, where farms with previous mycotoxin issues or high moisture environments test more frequently. Uncertainty does not justify inaction, rather, it underscores the need for regular monitoring and a conservative threshold for discarding suspicious feed.

#### Sustainability and Efficiency

Feed loss due to spoilage represents a direct economic waste and an environmental burden. Efficient inventory management reduces the carbon footprint associated with feed production and transport. Techniques from [Precision Livestock Farming technologies in pasture-based livestock systems](https://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/85121598355) can be adapted to monitor feed consumption and bin levels automatically, minimizing over-ordering and expiration. The [PubMed record 42112233](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42112233/) discusses how reducing feed wastage decreases ammonia emissions from pig houses, improving air quality. Sustainable storage practices,such as using sealed bins, rotating stock, and composting spoiled feed where feasible,align with both economic and environmental goals. Documentation of supplier quality guarantees and lot numbers supports traceability, enabling targeted recalls and reducing the volume of feed that must be discarded.

### Frequently Asked Questions

**1. What are the first signs that stored feed has spoiled?**
Visible mold, off-odor, or clumping indicate spoilage. Pigs may reduce intake, vomit, or develop diarrhea. A sudden drop in herd performance warrants feed inspection.

**2. How often should feed be tested for mycotoxins?**
Testing frequency depends on regional climate, ingredient sources, and previous contamination. As a general guide, test at least once per season or whenever switching suppliers. The FAO and the Merck Veterinary Manual advise routine screening if clinical signs appear.

**3. What is the most effective method to control rodents in a feed storage area?**
Seal all openings larger than 6 mm, remove harborage, and use a combination of snap traps and bait stations. Regular perimeter inspection and exclusion are more effective than reactive poisoning.

**4. What records should be kept for feed inventory?**
Record supplier name, lot number, delivery date, quantity, expected expiration date, and bin assignment. Also log daily feed-out amounts and any observations of spoilage or pest activity.

**5. Can I reuse feed storage bins without cleaning?**
No. Bins should be emptied and cleaned between batches or at least annually. Sweep out fines, inspect for mold and insects, and sanitize with a safe disinfectant. Residual old feed can inoculate new feed.

**6. What information should I obtain from feed suppliers?**
Request a certificate of analysis for mycotoxins, nutritional composition, and a guarantee of quality. The supplier should provide ingredient sourcing and processing details to help assess contamination risk.

**7. How does feed storage affect environmental sustainability?**
Proper storage reduces waste, saving resources used in feed production. Spoiled feed that enters manure can increase ammonia emissions and nutrient runoff. Efficient inventory management lowers the carbon footprint of the operation.

**8. When should I involve a veterinarian regarding feed storage?**
Consult a veterinarian if you observe unexplained illness, poor feed conversion, or reproduction problems that do not respond to standard management changes. Also involve them if laboratory feed tests show elevated mycotoxins or pathogens.

---

*Educational veterinary notice: Feed storage management is a direct determinant of swine herd health and farm profitability. This article provides general guidance, specific practices should be adapted to local conditions and reviewed with a licensed veterinarian. Any suspected feed-related disease outbreak requires prompt professional diagnosis and intervention.*

## Related Farming Guides

- [Pig Farming Breeding Farrowing Nursery Grow Finish Nutrition And Biosecurity](/knowledge/animal-farming/swine/pig-farming-breeding-farrowing-nursery-grow-finish-nutrition-and-biosecurity)
- [Farrowing House Preparation And Sow Care](/knowledge/animal-farming/swine/farrowing-house-preparation-and-sow-care)
- [Newborn Piglet Care During The First 48 Hours](/knowledge/animal-farming/swine/newborn-piglet-care-during-the-first-48-hours)
- [Pig Farm Biosecurity Plan](/knowledge/animal-farming/swine/pig-farm-biosecurity-plan)
- [Production Records For Pig Farms](/knowledge/animal-farming/swine/production-records-for-pig-farms)

## Related Clinical & Scientific Guides

* [Pig Enrichment Programs and Behavior Monitoring](/knowledge/animal-farming/swine/pig-enrichment-programs-and-behavior-monitoring)
* [Swine Handling Facility Design for Safe Pig Movement](/knowledge/animal-farming/swine/swine-handling-facility-design-safe-pig-movement)
* [Swine Feeding Management for Grow-Finish Pigs](/knowledge/animal-farming/swine/swine-feeding-management-for-grow-finish-pigs)


## References and Further Reading

- [FAO Animal Production and Health](https://www.fao.org/animal-production/en/)
- [WOAH Terrestrial Animal Health Code](https://www.woah.org/en/what-we-do/standards/codes-and-manuals/terrestrial-code-online-access/)
- [USDA APHIS Livestock and Poultry Disease](https://www.aphis.usda.gov/livestock-poultry-disease)
- [Merck Veterinary Manual](https://www.merckvetmanual.com/)
- [USDA National Animal Health Monitoring System](https://www.aphis.usda.gov/livestock-poultry-disease/nahms)

> This article is educational and is not a substitute for veterinary diagnosis, treatment, public-health guidance, or regulatory reporting.


<div data-calculator="livestock"></div>