Infectious Myonecrosis Virus

Overview and Taxonomy of Infectious Myonecrosis Virus

Infectious myonecrosis virus (IMNV) represents one of the most formidable viral pathogens confronting the global penaeid shrimp aquaculture industry, causing progressive muscle necrosis and mortality events that can decimate production cycles and induce catastrophic economic losses. Since its initial recognition as a distinct disease entity in the early 2000s, IMNV has transitioned from a geographically restricted pathogen to a transboundary aquatic animal pathogen of significant concern, warranting its inclusion on the World Organisation for Animal Health (WOAH, formerly OIE) list of notifiable crustacean diseases [5, 8]. The virus exemplifies the challenges of emerging infectious diseases in aquaculture systems, where intensive farming practices, global translocation of live animals, and environmental stressors converge to facilitate pathogen emergence, establishment, and dissemination. Understanding the fundamental virological characteristics, taxonomic positioning, and phylogenetic relationships of IMNV is not merely an academic exercise; it constitutes the essential foundation upon which diagnostic strategies, epidemiological surveillance programs, and rational control measures are constructed.

Discovery and Historical Emergence

The history of IMNV is a relatively recent chapter in the annals of aquatic virology. The disease was first recognized during a severe outbreak among cultured Pacific whiteleg shrimp (Penaeus vannamei) in northeastern Brazil in 2002, where affected populations exhibited a distinctive and alarming clinical presentation characterized by whitened, necrotic abdominal musculature and unusually high mortality rates [1, 5, 11]. The causative agent was subsequently isolated, characterized, and formally described in 2004, establishing IMNV as a novel viral pathogen distinct from previously known shrimp viruses [11]. For several years following its initial description, the geographic distribution of IMNV appeared confined to Brazil. However, in 2006, the virus was detected in diseased P. vannamei cultivated in Indonesia, marking a dramatic transcontinental leap that signaled the pathogen's capacity for long-distance dispersal [6, 9, 13]. The introduction of IMNV into Indonesia, likely facilitated by the international trade of infected broodstock or post-larvae, resulted in a rapid and devastating spread across major shrimp farming regions of the archipelago, with significant drops in production reported by 2009 [1, 6]. Since that pivotal introduction, molecular epidemiological evidence has strongly supported the hypothesis that the Indonesian outbreaks originated from a Brazilian source, with subsequent diversification and spread to other Asian countries [1, 11]. The global impact of IMNV on shrimp aquaculture is staggering, with cumulative economic losses estimated in the billions of dollars, reflecting not only acute mortality but also the costs associated with enhanced biosecurity, diagnostic testing, and lost production capacity [3, 10].

Taxonomic Classification and Virion Architecture

From a taxonomic perspective, IMNV is classified within the family Totiviridae, a group of viruses characterized by non-enveloped, icosahedral particles approximately 40 nanometers in diameter that encapsidate a double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) genome [5, 8]. The genus placement of IMNV has been a subject of considerable virological interest. While the virion morphology and genome organization share fundamental features with the Totiviridae, IMNV exhibits significant divergence from the classical totiviruses that primarily infect fungi and protozoa. The viral genome consists of a single molecule of linear dsRNA, approximately 7.5 to 7.6 kilobase pairs in length, which represents one of the largest genomes among the totiviruses and is substantially larger than the archetypal members of this family [11, 14]. This expanded genomic capacity is reflected in the complexity of its coding potential. The genome contains two major open reading frames (ORFs). ORF1 encodes a large polyprotein that is proteolytically processed to yield the major capsid protein, which is the primary structural component of the virion and is essential for viral entry, assembly, and antigenicity [14]. ORF2, which overlaps with ORF1 in a region that contains a predicted ribosomal frameshift element, encodes the RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp), the enzymatic machinery responsible for viral genome replication and transcription [11, 12]. The RdRp is a hallmark of all RNA viruses and is a critical target for molecular diagnostics and potential antiviral interventions. The capsid protein, expressed from the N-terminal and C-terminal fragments of the ORF1 polyprotein, has been a focus of intense research, including the development of monoclonal antibodies for immunodiagnostic applications [14].

Phylogenetic Relationships and Genetic Diversity

The phylogenetic characterization of IMNV isolates from different geographic origins has revealed a compelling narrative of viral emergence, spread, and ongoing diversification. Comprehensive sequence analyses of the RdRp gene and the capsid-encoding region have consistently demonstrated a clear phylogenetic separation between South American (Brazilian) and Asian (predominantly Indonesian) lineages [1, 9, 11]. This divergence is not merely a reflection of geographic separation but is actively driven by evolutionary forces. Studies employing selection pressure analyses have documented that the majority of IMNV proteins are under positive selection, meaning that mutations conferring adaptive advantages are preferentially retained in the population, particularly in the Asian isolates [1]. This process has resulted in a remarkable diversity of haplotypes within Asia, suggesting that the virus is undergoing rapid evolution in its new ecological niche, potentially adapting to different host populations, environmental conditions, and farming practices [1, 11]. Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) are abundant across the viral genome, and while the primary structure of most proteins is largely preserved, these subtle genetic variations may have profound implications for viral fitness, pathogenicity, and the sensitivity of diagnostic assays [1, 12]. The existence of genetically distinct strains underscores the necessity of ongoing surveillance to ensure that molecular detection tools remain robust against emerging variants.

Host Range and Tissue Tropism

The host range of IMNV is a critical determinant of its epidemiological behavior. The principal natural host and the species most severely affected is the whiteleg shrimp Penaeus vannamei, which is the dominant species in global penaeid aquaculture [5, 6, 13]. In P. vannamei, IMNV infection can result in cumulative mortality reaching 70% or higher, with surviving animals often displaying chronic pathology and serving as reservoirs for continued viral shedding [13]. The giant tiger shrimp Penaeus monodon has also been documented as a susceptible species, although infections in P. monodon often present as subclinical, with infected individuals appearing grossly normal yet harboring detectable viral RNA [7]. This carrier status in P. monodon is of profound concern for disease management, as asymptomatic broodstock or wild-caught animals can serve as inadvertent vectors for the introduction of IMNV to naïve hatchery and farm systems [7]. Recent experimental evidence has expanded the known host range to include the freshwater giant river prawn Macrobrachium rosenbergii. In a landmark study, subadult and adult M. rosenbergii were successfully infected with IMNV via intramuscular injection, demonstrating clinical signs and histopathological findings consistent with infection, including hemocyte infiltration and muscle sinus dilation [3]. Although mortality in challenged prawns was not massive, the demonstration that M. rosenbergii can support viral replication has significant ecological and epidemiological implications, as this species is often cultured in areas adjacent to or integrated with penaeid shrimp farms, or in inland freshwater systems where biosecurity may be less stringent [3, 4]. Furthermore, the detection of IMNV in carrier biota such as hermit crabs and barnacles collected from the vicinity of infected shrimp ponds indicates that the virus can persist in the broader aquatic environment, utilizing non-penaeid species as potential reservoirs or mechanical vectors [2]. The ability of IMNV to infect such a diverse array of crustacean hosts complicates control efforts and highlights the need for a holistic, ecosystem-based approach to disease management.

Molecular Pathogenesis and Viral Protein Evolution

The molecular pathogenesis of Infectious Myonecrosis Virus (IMNV) represents a sophisticated interplay between a relatively simple double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) virus and the complex, yet evolutionarily constrained, immune system of penaeid shrimp. As a pathogen listed by the World Organisation for Animal Health (WOAH), IMNV has caused catastrophic economic losses across the Americas and Southeast Asia, necessitating a deep understanding of its replication strategy, host subversion mechanisms, and the evolutionary forces that shape its genomic landscape [5, 8]. This section dissects the virus-host interaction at the molecular level, tracing the path from viral entry and replication to the systemic pathology of myonecrosis, while simultaneously examining how selective pressures and geographic isolation have driven the diversification of its viral proteins.

Genome Organization and the Replicative Machinery

The IMNV genome is a bipartite dsRNA molecule, a hallmark of the Totiviridae family, though its classification remains under scrutiny due to unique features. The larger segment encodes a major capsid protein (CP) within open reading frame 1 (ORF1), while a second ORF (ORF2) is expressed via a -1 ribosomal frameshifting mechanism, producing a fusion protein that includes the RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp) [11, 14]. This frameshift site, a critical regulatory element for viral replication efficiency, has been the subject of refined structural prediction. Recent sequence analyses from Indonesian and Brazilian isolates indicate that the pseudoknot predicted to stimulate this frameshift may be more complex than initially modeled, suggesting that subtle differences in this RNA structure could influence the stoichiometry of capsid to polymerase and, consequently, viral fitness [11].

The RdRp is the enzymatic core of the virus, responsible for both genome replication and transcription of viral mRNAs. Genetic characterization of the RdRp gene (regions 12 and 13) from Indonesian isolates has revealed a high degree of conservation at the amino acid level, with homology values reaching 99-100% compared to the Brazilian prototype strain [12]. This near-perfect conservation of the RdRp active site underscores its essential, invariant function. However, the same studies identified synonymous nucleotide substitutions, indicating that while the protein sequence is under strong purifying selection, the underlying RNA genome is accumulating neutral mutations, providing a substrate for future evolutionary change without compromising catalytic activity [12]. This molecular clock operates against a backdrop of positive selection acting on other viral proteins, primarily the capsid, which must navigate the host's evolving immune surveillance.

Molecular Mechanisms of Pathogenesis: From Entry to Necrosis

The pathogenesis of IMNV is fundamentally a story of host mimicry, immune evasion, and profound cellular disruption. The virus exhibits a broad tropism, targeting not only skeletal muscle, the site of its most dramatic clinical signs, but also the lymphoid organ, gills, heart, and circulating hemocytes [14]. The initial steps of entry are likely mediated by the capsid protein, which must engage unidentified receptors on the host cell surface. The capsid protein itself is a tripartite structure; monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) have been raised against its N-terminal, internal, and C-terminal fragments, all of which are capable of recognizing native virus in infected tissues [14]. This indicates that the entire capsid surface is presented to the host environment and is a primary target for humoral immune responses, though as invertebrates, shrimp lack a classical adaptive antibody system.

Once internalized, the dsRNA genome acts as a potent pathogen-associated molecular pattern (PAMP). In Penaeus vannamei, dsRNA triggers the RNA interference (RNAi) pathway, a critical antiviral defense. IMNV, however, appears to exert a sophisticated countermeasure. Experimental infections have demonstrated that increasing viral loads lead to significant transcriptional upregulation of key RNAi components, including Sid-1 (a dsRNA channel protein), Dicer-2 (the nuclease that processes dsRNA into siRNAs), and Argonaute-2 (the slicer protein of the RISC complex) [18]. This induction suggests that the host mounts a robust RNAi response. Paradoxically, despite this upregulation, viral loads did not decrease over the course of the experiment. This suggests that IMNV has evolved a mechanism to subvert the RNAi pathway downstream of transcript induction, potentially by encoding a viral suppressor of RNAi (VSR), a feature common among dsRNA viruses but not yet definitively identified in IMNV [18]. The expression of Sid-1 has been proposed as a sensitive marker of active viral replication, as its mRNA levels correlate tightly with the progression of infection [18].

The host's stress response is equally critical. High-density rearing, a common practice in intensive aquaculture, acts as a co-factor for disease. Stocking densities of 400 shrimp/m² significantly accelerate the onset of clinical symptoms compared to lower densities [17]. This is mirrored at the molecular level, where the expression of stress-related genes is profoundly altered. The lectin gene and the translationally controlled tumor protein (TCTP) gene are upregulated during infection, while the Toll receptor gene is downregulated [17]. Lectins are pattern-recognition receptors involved in pathogen opsonization, and their upregulation represents a typical antimicrobial response. TCTP, however, is a multifunctional protein involved in cell growth and stress protection; its increase suggests that the host is attempting to mitigate cellular damage. Conversely, the downregulation of the Toll receptor, a master regulator of the Toll signaling pathway that controls the expression of several antimicrobial peptides, represents a potential vulnerability. By suppressing this key immune sensor, IMNV may create a permissive environment for its own replication and for co-infections.

The culmination of this dysregulation is the characteristic pathology of muscle necrosis. Histopathological examinations consistently reveal a triad of damage: severe muscle necrosis with liquefaction, hemocyte infiltration into the affected tissues, and the formation of spheroids in the lymphoid organ [20, 21]. The muscle fibers themselves undergo Zenker's necrosis, a type of coagulative necrosis unique to skeletal muscle, with swelling, loss of striation, and fragmentation [21]. The massive hemocyte infiltration is not a sterile response; it is a direct consequence of viral replication within those very cells. Immunohistochemistry using MAbs against the capsid protein has shown intense staining within infiltrating hemocytes, indicating that these immune cells themselves become viral factories, potentially serving as vehicles to disseminate the virus to distant muscle bundles [14]. The lymphatic system, particularly the lymphoid organ, becomes a major site of viral sequestration and damage, with the formation of spheroids representing a pathological reorganization of this tissue [20].

Selective Pressures and the Evolution of Viral Proteins

The evolutionary trajectory of IMNV is a story of a founder effect followed by rapid adaptation to new hosts and environments. The prevailing phylogeographic model, supported by haplotype diversity and nucleotide substitution analyses, posits a single introduction from Brazil to Indonesia, likely through the movement of infected broodstock or commodities, followed by a subsequent radiation throughout Southeast Asia [1, 11, 15]. This founder event created two distinct lineages, South American and Asian, that are now diverging under different selective regimes.

The most striking finding from comparative genomics is that the majority of IMNV proteins are under positive selection [1]. This is a significant departure from the common expectation for viral structural proteins, which are often constrained. Positive selection implies that amino acid changes are being fixed in the population at a rate higher than neutral expectation, driven by adaptive advantages. This is most pronounced in the capsid protein, the primary interface with the host environment. The selective forces likely include: (1) immune evasion: mutations that allow the capsid to escape recognition by host pattern-recognition receptors; (2) host range adaptation: fine-tuning the capsid to efficiently enter the cells of different penaeid species, from P. vannamei to P. monodon and even the freshwater prawn Macrobrachium rosenbergii [3, 7]; and (3) environmental adaptation: adjusting stability and entry kinetics to match local water temperatures and salinity.

The analysis of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) across the genome confirms that Asian strains harbor a greater diversity of haplotypes than Brazilian strains, consistent with a longer period of adaptation and a larger, more diverse host population [1]. This diversification is not random; it follows a pattern of geographic clustering. Isolates from Java, Sumatra, and Kalimantan in Indonesia show distinct phylogenetic branches, as do isolates from different regions of Brazil [9, 11, 12]. The environment, specifically water temperature, acts as a powerful selective filter. Hyperthermia (temperatures of 32°C and 33°C) dramatically shortens the incubation period of IMNV and increases mortality, not only by stressing the host but also by potentially increasing the rate of viral RNA replication and mutation [19]. This suggests that strains circulating in warmer regions may be under more intense selective pressure for rapid replication, potentially selecting for higher-fitness variants that could overcome host defenses more quickly.

The capsid protein evolution is not merely a neutral drift. Sequence comparisons between the Banten isolate (Indonesia) and the Brazilian prototype (AY570982) reveal 97.4-100% nucleotide identity and 97.6-100% amino acid identity, indicating that while the overall structure is conserved, specific residues are changing [9]. These non-synonymous changes, clustered in the N- and C-terminal regions of the capsid, are likely to be the targets of host immune selection. This localized, rapid evolution of the capsid is reminiscent of the antigenic drift seen in RNA viruses of vertebrates, and it has profound implications for the durability of any future vaccines or antibody-based diagnostics. Indeed, while monoclonal antibodies have been developed against these conserved and variable regions, the potential for epitope loss through mutation is a real concern [14].

In contrast to the capsid, the RdRp is remarkably stable [12]. This dichotomy is a classic evolutionary strategy: the core replication machinery must be maintained in an optimal catalytic state, while the surface proteins must constantly change to stay ahead of the host. The combination of a highly conserved RdRp and a rapidly evolving capsid provides the molecular basis for IMNV's success. It is a virus that can persist in a population by escaping immune recognition while maintaining a robust replicative capacity. The detection of IMNV in seemingly healthy P. monodon broodstock from the Indian Ocean, which may serve as asymptomatic carriers, further complicates the picture [7]. These carriers could act as mixing vessels, allowing reassortment or recombination between different viral quasispecies, accelerating the rate of evolution and potentially giving rise to strains with altered virulence or host range.

The molecular pathogenesis of IMNV is therefore not a static process but a dynamic arms race. The virus has decoupled its replication fidelity (RdRp) from its antigenic identity (capsid), allowing it to navigate the host immune system with remarkable agility. Understanding the precise molecular contacts between the capsid and host receptors, identifying the putative viral suppressor of RNAi, and tracking the real-time evolution of the capsid under the selective pressure of novel environments and hosts are the critical frontiers for future research. Only by understanding this molecular dance can we hope to develop durable control strategies, such as RNAi-based therapeutics that target conserved regions of the genome or immunostimulants that can compensate for the Toll receptor downregulation, to tilt the balance back in favor of the shrimp [10, 16-18].

Genetic Diversity and Adaptive Mutations

The genetic landscape of infectious myonecrosis virus (IMNV) represents a dynamic and evolving tapestry that fundamentally underpins its virulence, host range, and epidemiological trajectory across global shrimp aquaculture. As a double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) virus belonging to the family Totiviridae, IMNV possesses a non-segmented genome of approximately 8.2–8.5 kb, encoding two major open reading frames (ORF1 and ORF2) that give rise to a capsid protein precursor (CP) and an RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp), respectively [11, 21]. The genetic architecture of this pathogen, particularly the selective pressures acting upon these core proteins, has profound implications for both its evolutionary potential and its capacity to circumvent host antiviral defenses. Understanding these patterns is not merely an academic exercise but a critical prerequisite for the development of durable diagnostic tools, effective vaccines, and informed biosecurity protocols.

Phylogenetic Divergence and Global Dispersal Patterns

The most compelling narrative emerging from the molecular epidemiology of IMNV is the clear and unambiguous phylogenetic divergence between South American and Asian strains. Initial characterization of isolates from the 2002 Brazilian outbreak, followed by the 2006 emergence in Indonesia, provided the foundation for understanding the virus's transcontinental journey [1, 11]. Complete genome sequencing of two Indonesian strains, coupled with partial sequencing of six additional isolates, has unequivocally demonstrated that the Indonesian epizootic did not arise from a separate, undetected endemic source but rather from a direct introduction of the Brazilian lineage [11]. This conclusion is reinforced by extensive haplotype analyses that reveal a far greater genetic diversity within Asian populations compared to their Brazilian counterparts, a pattern consistent with a founder event followed by rapid, localized diversification [1]. The Asian isolates, having been introduced into a novel ecological and immunological landscape, appear to have undergone accelerated genetic drift and positive selection, leading to the emergence of distinct phylogroups that share 97.4–100% nucleotide identity with Brazilian reference strains for the partial ORF1 gene [9].

This divergence is not a trivial observation; it indicates that the virus is actively adapting to new hosts, environmental conditions, and perhaps even to the specific immunological pressures exerted by Penaeus vannamei and, critically, alternative host species. The detection of IMNV in wild-caught Penaeus monodon broodstock from the Indian Ocean, amplicons of which showed 99–100% identity to known targets [7], raises the alarming possibility that non-lethal carriers may serve as vectors for the introduction of novel genetic variants into naïve populations. Furthermore, the demonstration that Macrobrachium rosenbergii subadults and adults are susceptible to IMNV, albeit without massive mortality, adds a crucial dimension to the virus's genetic ecology [3]. Such alternate hosts can act as reservoirs, allowing the virus to persist and accumulate mutations that may later prove advantageous for infecting primary targets like P. vannamei. The genetic bottlenecking that occurs during these cross-species transmission events can drastically alter the allele frequencies within the viral population, potentially fixing mutations that are neutral or even deleterious in the original host but adaptive in the new environment.

Molecular Mechanisms of Adaptive Evolution: Positive Selection and Structural Constraints

A rigorous examination of the selective forces shaping IMNV's evolution reveals a sophisticated interplay between the need to maintain essential protein structure and the opportunity to explore new sequence space. A comprehensive analysis using site-specific models of codon evolution has demonstrated that the majority of viral proteins, particularly the capsid and RdRp, are under pervasive positive selection [1]. This is a hallmark of host-pathogen arms races, where the virus must continually alter its antigenic landscape to evade the host's immune surveillance. The capsid protein, being the primary interface with the shrimp's humoral and cellular immune systems, is a predictable target for such selection. Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) are distributed across the capsid-encoding regions, and while the overall primary structure is preserved, indicating strong functional constraints on the protein fold, the accumulation of non-synonymous changes suggests an ongoing process of antigenic drift [1, 14].

The RdRp, encoded by ORF2, is arguably the most critical enzyme for viral fitness. Its intrinsic error rate is the engine of genetic diversity, generating a cloud of quasi-species from which advantageous variants can be selected. Characterization of the RdRp gene from Indonesian isolates (Lampung, Gresik) revealed homologies of 98.04–99.58% at the nucleotide level and 99.04–100% at the amino acid level when compared to the Brazilian reference [12]. This near-perfect conservation of the amino acid sequence is expected for a highly constrained enzyme; even minor alterations to the active site or the polymerase core could be catastrophic. However, the silent third-codon position polymorphisms (synonymous substitutions) are abundant, suggesting that mutation itself is not being selected against, but rather that the amino acid sequence is maintained by strong purifying selection. This is a classic signature of a virus that is optimizing its replication machinery while allowing for silent variation that may not immediately affect fitness but provides a reservoir for future adaptation under shifting environmental conditions.

The importance of the ribosomal frameshifting element, a pseudoknot structure required for the translation of the RdRp from ORF2, must also be considered as a site of potential adaptive evolution. The pseudoknot is a delicate RNA structure, and mutations that alter its stability can have profound effects on the ratio of CP to RdRp, thereby influencing viral replicative capacity. The revised pseudoknot prediction based on the newer Indonesian sequences [11] hints that this element may be evolving in response to differences in the host translational machinery or to optimize the stoichiometry of viral proteins for different cellular environments. This is a subtle but potentially powerful mechanism for adaptation that is often overlooked.

Environmental Drivers of Genetic Selection and Population Structure

The selective pressures acting on IMNV are not purely intrinsic; they are intimately linked to the abiotic environment in which the virus and its host are immersed. Environmental parameters, particularly temperature, have been shown to act as potent modulators of viral replication and, by extension, as selective filters on the viral population. Hyperthermic conditions (32°C and 33°C) dramatically reduce the incubation period of IMNV and increase mortality [19]. This temperature-dependent replication rate creates a scenario where faster-replicating variants may be favored at higher temperatures, shifting the genetic composition of the viral population. The stress induced by high stocking densities (400 shrimp/m²) also accelerates the onset of clinical signs and modulates the expression of host immune genes such as lectin and TCTP [17]. This host stress response, while not directly mutating the virus, can alter the selective environment by affecting the viral load and the duration of infection, thereby influencing the effective population size and the probability of mutation fixation.

The role of the pond environment as a reservoir for genetic mixing should not be underestimated. The detection of IMNV in carrier biota (e.g., hermit crabs and barnacles) and in the water column of shrimp ponds [2] indicates that the virus exists in a complex meta-community. Physical parameters such as salinity, temperature, and organic load, which show strong correlations with IMNV prevalence [25, 26], can create microenvironments that favor particular viral variants. For example, a pond with suboptimal dissolved oxygen or extreme temperature fluctuations may select for IMNV variants with mutations in genes related to stress tolerance or entry efficiency. The very strong correlation between environmental parameters and prevalence observed in semi-intensive and intensive ponds in Bengkulu [25, 26] underscores that the viral genetic diversity is not randomly distributed but is shaped by the ecological context.

Implications for Diagnostic Vigilance and Therapeutic Development

The demonstrated genetic diversity of IMNV carries profound and immediate consequences for both diagnostic reliability and the development of control strategies. The divergence between Brazilian and Indonesian lineages, and the ongoing diversification within Asia, necessitates a continuous re-evaluation of molecular diagnostic targets. Primers and probes designed against the original Brazilian sequence (AY570982) may yield false negatives or reduced sensitivity for emerging Asian variants, and indeed, the development of highly sensitive nested RT-PCR and isothermal recombinase amplification (ERA) assays [22-24] must be validated against a broad panel of contemporary isolates. The fact that some previously suspected outbreaks in Asia were shown to be false alarms due to muscle cramp syndrome [13] only heightens the need for sequence-confirmed diagnostics that account for genetic drift. The use of monoclonal antibodies targeting specific epitopes of the capsid protein [14] is valuable, but these epitopes are themselves subject to mutation, and a single amino acid change could render them useless for detection.

The genetic adaptation of IMNV also has direct bearing on the efficacy of immune-boosting dietary interventions. While numerous studies have demonstrated that β-glucans, probiotics like Bacillus NP5 and Vibrio alginolyticus, synbiotics, and plant extracts (honeysuckle, Cynodon dactylon, squid ink) can enhance survival following IMNV challenge [10, 16, 27-30], the broad-spectrum nature of these non-specific immune stimulants may provide a degree of protection against diverse viral strains. However, the fact that the virus is under positive selection for capsid antigens suggests that future vaccine strategies relying on a single recombinant protein may be vulnerable to strain-specific immunity. The observation that temperature stress, acting as an environmental selective force, can reduce incubation periods and increase mortality [19] further complicates the picture, as management practices in different climatic zones may inadvertently select for more virulent or faster-replicating variants. The virus's ability to upregulate RNAi-related genes (Sid-1, Dicer-2, Argonaute-2) in the host [18] indicates that the host's own antiviral machinery is being hijacked, a process that could be affected by viral genetic variation in the RNAi suppressor elements, if such elements exist in IMNV.

In conclusion, the genetic diversity of IMNV is a product of its replication error rate, its recent global spread through a founder effect, and the powerful selective pressures exerted by a novel host range, environmental gradients, and host immune responses. The South American and Asian strains have diverged significantly, and the Asian strains continue to accumulate mutations, particularly in the capsid protein. This dynamic evolutionary scenario demands that surveillance, diagnostics, and intervention strategies be adaptive and informed by continual molecular monitoring. The listing of IMNV by the World Organisation for Animal Health (WOAH) underscores its global economic significance, and the genetic data strongly suggest that this is not a static threat but one that will continue to evolve, potentially altering its virulence, tissue tropism, and host spectrum in unpredictable ways.

Global Epidemiology and Phylogeography of Infectious Myonecrosis Virus

Origins, Emergence, and Transcontinental Dissemination

Infectious myonecrosis virus (IMNV) represents one of the most economically devastating pathogens to emerge within the global penaeid shrimp farming industry over the past two decades. The epidemiological trajectory of this double-stranded RNA virus, from its initial recognition in northeastern Brazil in 2002 to its subsequent transpacific leap into Southeast Asia, constitutes a paradigmatic case study in the anthropogenic translocation of aquatic pathogens. The virus was first identified during mass mortality events affecting Penaeus vannamei cultures in the state of Piauí, Brazil, where affected animals exhibited the pathognomonic whitening of abdominal musculature and an estimated cumulative mortality approaching 70% [5, 11]. Retrospective molecular analyses subsequently confirmed that IMNV had been circulating undetected in Brazilian aquaculture circuits as early as 2002, though the causative agent was not formally characterized until 2004 [11]. The World Organisation for Animal Health (WOAH, formerly OIE) now lists IMNV as a notifiable crustacean disease, reflecting its capacity for rapid transboundary spread and its profound impact on international shrimp trade and food security.

The most consequential epidemiological event in the history of IMNV occurred in 2006, when the virus was detected in Penaeus vannamei cultivated in Situbondo, East Java, Indonesia [6, 9, 13]. This represented the first confirmed incursion of IMNV into Asia, and by 2009, the pathogen had disseminated to virtually all major shrimp-producing regions within the Indonesian archipelago [6]. The precise mechanism of introduction remains speculative, though the prevailing hypothesis, supported by robust phylogeographic evidence, implicates the movement of live broodstock or contaminated shrimp products from Brazil to Indonesia [1, 11]. Subsequent molecular epidemiological investigations have furnished compelling data reinforcing this scenario. Comprehensive phylogenetic analyses of complete and partial genome sequences from Brazilian and Indonesian isolates have consistently resolved two distinct, geographically segregated clades, with the Indonesian lineage appearing to derive from a founder event originating from South American stocks [1, 11]. The directionality of spread is unambiguous: Brazilian isolates occupy a basal position in phylogenetic reconstructions, while Indonesian strains form a monophyletic cluster consistent with a single introduction followed by in situ diversification [11]. This pattern mirrors the historical spread of other major shrimp viruses, most notably white spot syndrome virus (WSSV), which demonstrates how globalized aquaculture supply chains can serve as vectors for pathogen dissemination across oceanic basins.

Phylogeographic Architecture and Molecular Diversification

The phylogeographic structure of IMNV reveals a virus that has undergone significant genetic diversification since its separation into allopatric South American and Asian populations. Complete genome sequencing of Indonesian isolates and partial sequencing of additional strains from across the archipelago have demonstrated that the virus is actively evolving, with nucleotide divergence between Brazilian and Indonesian lineages reaching approximately 3–5% across the genome [11]. This level of divergence, while modest in absolute terms, is sufficient to generate distinct evolutionary trajectories with potential implications for pathogenesis, diagnostic sensitivity, and vaccine or RNA interference-based therapeutic design. Critically, the open reading frame 1 (ORF1), which encodes the major capsid protein and a putative RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp), exhibits evidence of positive selection in both geographic lineages [1]. The retention of primary protein structure despite nucleotide variation suggests that purifying selection is operating to preserve functional integrity, while the accumulation of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) among isolates points to ongoing adaptive evolution [1]. Indeed, analysis of the RdRp-encoding region among Indonesian strains from Lampung, Gresik, and Pontianak has revealed nucleotide homologies of 98.04–99.58% relative to the Brazilian prototype (GenBank AY570982), with even higher conservation at the amino acid level (99.04–100%) [12]. This pattern of genetic stasis at the protein level, juxtaposed with silent nucleotide substitutions, is characteristic of a virus that has recently encountered a novel host population or environmental context and is undergoing fine-tuning of its replicative machinery.

The haplotype diversity of IMNV is markedly higher among Asian isolates compared to their Brazilian counterparts, a finding that carries profound epidemiological implications [1]. The elevated haplotype richness in Indonesia suggests that following the initial introduction, the virus experienced a rapid population expansion accompanied by lineage diversification, possibly driven by heterogeneous environmental conditions across the archipelago, variable host genetic backgrounds, or serial passage through different shrimp populations. This pattern is consistent with a founder effect followed by genetic drift and local adaptation in the novel geographic range. Conversely, the relatively lower haplotype diversity observed in Brazil may reflect a more recent origin or a more homogeneous selective environment. Importantly, the SNP density is not uniformly distributed across the IMNV genome; specific regions, including portions of the capsid-encoding segment, show elevated variability, potentially indicative of immune evasion or host-range adaptation [1]. These findings underscore the necessity of ongoing genomic surveillance to track the evolution of IMNV, as the emergence of antigenically or pathotypically distinct variants could compromise existing diagnostic assays or management strategies.

Contemporary Distribution and Endemicity Patterns

The global distribution of IMNV, as of the most recent surveillance data, is characterized by a pattern of discrete endemic foci with sporadic incursions into non-endemic regions. Brazil and Indonesia remain the two principal epicenters of IMNV infection, with the virus considered endemic in major shrimp-farming provinces of both nations [5, 15]. Within Brazil, the disease is concentrated in the northeastern states, where it was first recognized, although serological and molecular evidence suggests broader subclinical circulation [1, 5]. Indonesia presents a more complex epidemiological landscape, with IMNV detected across multiple islands and production zones, including East Java (Situbondo, Sidoarjo, Probolinggo), Lampung, Central Kalimantan, West Kalimantan (Pontianak), and the Banten province [9, 12, 20, 22]. Prevalence studies conducted in Indonesian farming regions have yielded highly variable estimates, ranging from 11.11% in initial Situbondo surveys to 33.3% across Banten province, with localized pockets reaching 44.43% in semi-intensive systems in Bengkulu Tengah and 100% in certain districts of Pandeglang (Banten) [9, 25, 26]. These data indicate that IMNV prevalence is not uniform but is strongly modulated by farm-level biosecurity practices, stocking densities, and environmental parameters.

The epidemiological situation in the Indian subcontinent warrants particular scrutiny. Systematic surveillance of P. vannamei and Penaeus monodon farms along the Indian coastline, employing nested RT-PCR, the gold standard for IMNV detection, initially failed to identify any positive cases, leading to the conclusion that IMNV was absent from Indian shrimp aquaculture as recently as 2017 [8]. However, more recent investigations have complicated this narrative. In 2022, researchers detected IMNV in P. vannamei reared in freshwater (0 ppt salinity) ponds in Tamil Nadu, representing the first confirmed report of the virus in Indian farmed shrimp [4]. The inoculum prepared from these freshwater-reared, IMNV-infected animals caused 100% mortality in experimental challenges, confirming that the virus retained full virulence [4]. This finding raises critical questions regarding the previous absence of detection. It is plausible that IMNV was present in India at low prevalence prior to 2017 but eluded surveillance efforts due to sampling biases, low viral loads in subclinically infected animals, or the use of diagnostic assays with insufficient sensitivity. Alternatively, the Tamil Nadu detection may represent a relatively recent incursion, underscoring the porous nature of aquatic animal disease barriers in a region characterized by intensive transboundary trade in live shrimp and feed ingredients.

The Middle East has also emerged as a region of epidemiological interest. A 2021 study of cultured penaeid shrimp (Penaeus semisulcatus) from Egyptian farms along the Mediterranean coast (Damietta and North Sinai governorates) reported an IMNV prevalence of 37.5% using PCR-based diagnostics [21]. Phylogenetic analysis of Egyptian isolates revealed close genetic similarity (96.3–97% nucleotide identity) to reference strains from Brazil, Indonesia, the USA, China, and other Asian countries, suggesting multiple potential sources of introduction [21]. Historically, IMNV was considered absent from the Middle East and North Africa; these findings, if corroborated by ongoing surveillance, would substantially expand the known geographic range of the virus and highlight the role of unregulated live animal movements or contaminated feed ingredients in facilitating long-distance dispersal.

Incursion Risk, Detection Gaps, and the Role of Carrier Species

A critical dimension of IMNV epidemiology concerns the potential for cryptic transmission via non-lethal carrier species and environmental reservoirs. While P. vannamei is the principal clinical host, experimental studies have demonstrated that the giant tiger shrimp Penaeus monodon can harbor IMNV without exhibiting overt signs of disease [7]. Screening of grossly normal, wild-caught P. monodon broodstock from the Indian Ocean (destined for hatchery use) yielded positive PCR results for IMNV, with sequenced amplicons showing 99–100% identity to known viral targets [7]. This finding has profound epidemiological implications: apparently healthy P. monodon can serve as subclinical carriers, potentially facilitating the introduction of IMNV into biosecure hatchery facilities and, from there, into new geographic regions. The risk is exacerbated by the fact that wild-caught broodstock may traverse international boundaries without adequate health certification, and that conventional visual inspection is insufficient to identify infected individuals.

Further expanding the host range, recent experimental challenges have demonstrated that the giant freshwater prawn Macrobrachium rosenbergii, a species cultured extensively in inland waters across South and Southeast Asia, is susceptible to IMNV infection [3]. While challenged subadults and adults did not experience massive mortalities, all animals tested positive by nested PCR and exhibited characteristic histopathological findings, including hemocyte infiltration and muscle sinus dilation [3]. The ability of IMNV to replicate in a freshwater palaemonid prawn raises the specter of transmission through polyculture systems, where marine and freshwater species are farmed in proximity, or through the use of IMNV-contaminated water sources. Indeed, environmental surveillance studies in Indonesia have detected IMNV genetic material in water samples and in carrier biota, including hermit crabs and barnacles, collected from shrimp pond effluents and adjacent coastal waters [2]. The presence of the virus in these non-target species and environmental matrices suggests that IMNV can persist outside of its principal penaeid host, potentially surviving long enough to be transported via tidal currents, ballast water, or shared water management infrastructure.

A further epidemiological complication arises from the phenomenon of misdiagnosis. During the period following the initial Indonesian outbreak, numerous unconfirmed reports of IMNV emerged from other Asian nations, including China, Thailand, Vietnam, and the Philippines [13]. Systematic testing of suspected samples by nested RT-PCR, validated against histopathology and sequencing, consistently yielded negative results, leading investigators to conclude that these were false alarms [13]. The confusion was likely attributable to muscle cramp syndrome, a non-infectious condition of P. vannamei that produces whitened abdominal musculature, mimicking the clinical presentation of IMNV [13]. This diagnostic ambiguity underscores the importance of molecular confirmation in epidemiological investigations, as reliance on gross clinical signs alone can lead to erroneous reporting and unnecessary trade restrictions. The absence of official IMNV reports from non-Indonesian Asian countries in the Quarterly Aquatic Animal Disease reports of the Network of Aquaculture Centres in Asia-Pacific (NACA) since 2007 further corroborates the conclusion that the virus has not established endemic foci beyond Indonesia and Brazil [13]. However, given the recent detection in India [4] and Egypt [21], and the capacity for subclinical carriage in P. monodon [7], the epidemiological status of IMNV in Asia must be considered dynamic and under active surveillance.

Epidemiological Drivers: Environmental Stressors and Farming Practices

The epidemiology of IMNV at the farm level is inextricably linked to environmental conditions and management practices that modulate host susceptibility and viral replication kinetics. Temperature has emerged as a critical abiotic determinant of disease outcome. Experimental challenge studies have demonstrated that hyperthermia significantly exacerbates IMNV pathogenesis: shrimp infected with IMNV and reared at 32°C and 33°C exhibited survival rates of only 28.89% and 24.44%, respectively, compared to 51.11% at 30°C [19]. Critically, elevated temperatures shortened the incubation period from 5 days at 30°C to just 2 days at 33°C [19]. These findings indicate that thermal stress acts synergistically with viral infection to accelerate pathological processes, likely through the induction of host stress responses that suppress antiviral immunity or through direct effects on viral replication kinetics. In practical terms, this means that IMNV outbreaks are more likely to occur during periods of elevated water temperature, particularly in tropical regions where seasonal temperature fluctuations are pronounced. The implications for climate change are sobering: as average water temperatures rise across shrimp-growing regions, the window for IMNV transmission and disease expression may widen, increasing both the frequency and severity of outbreaks.

Stocking density represents a second major epidemiological driver. Research has established that shrimp reared at high densities (400 individuals/m²) exhibit faster progression of IMNV infection, as evidenced by earlier onset of clinical signs, compared to those stocked at lower densities (100–200 individuals/m²) [17]. The mechanistic basis for this phenomenon is likely multifactorial, encompassing increased physiological stress due to crowding, impaired water quality (reduced dissolved oxygen, elevated ammonia), and enhanced horizontal transmission opportunities through cannibalism of moribund individuals. Transcriptomic analyses have revealed that high-density rearing conditions modulate the expression of immune-related genes during IMNV infection. Specifically, lectin and translationally controlled tumor protein (TCTP) are upregulated, while Toll receptor expression is downregulated [17]. This gene expression profile suggests that density-induced stress may compromise pattern recognition receptor signaling, thereby impairing the host’s ability to mount an effective antiviral response. The practical corollary is that adherence to best management practices regarding stocking density, typically 100–150 shrimp/m² for semi-intensive systems, is not merely a production optimization tool but a fundamental epidemiological control measure.

Water quality parameters, including salinity, pH, temperature, and ammonia concentrations, have been shown to correlate with IMNV prevalence in field studies. Investigation of intensive shrimp farms in Bengkulu Province, Indonesia, revealed a 31.94% prevalence of IMNV, with statistical analyses indicating a strong correlation between several water quality variables and infection risk [25]. Similarly, semi-intensive farms in Bengkulu Tengah exhibited a 44.43% prevalence, with environmental parameters again showing a very strong correlation with disease occurrence [26]. While these studies are correlational rather than causal, they strongly suggest that suboptimal water quality creates a physiological milieu that favors viral replication or suppresses host immunity. The specific mechanisms, whether via direct effects on viral stability, modulation of host stress hormones, or alteration of the shrimp microbiome, remain to be fully elucidated but represent an important avenue for future research. From a policy perspective, these findings reinforce the WOAH guidelines recommending environmental monitoring as an integral component of disease surveillance programs for IMNV.

Surveillance Challenges and Gaps in Global Coverage

Despite advances in molecular diagnostics, including the development of highly sensitive real-time recombinase amplification assays and monoclonal antibody-based immunodetection methods [14, 23], significant gaps persist in the global surveillance network for IMNV. A scientometric analysis of the research landscape reveals that IMNV-related studies are heavily concentrated in a small number of countries, primarily Brazil, Indonesia, Thailand, India, and China, while vast geographic areas remain undersampled or entirely unmonitored [15]. The African continent outside of Egypt, the Middle East beyond the Levant, and much of Latin America except Brazil have contributed negligible data to the global IMNV literature. This uneven distribution of research effort creates blind spots in our understanding of the virus’s true geographic range. It is plausible that IMNV circulates undetected in shrimp farming regions that lack diagnostic capacity, particularly in sub-Saharan Africa, where shrimp aquaculture is expanding rapidly without commensurate investment in aquatic animal health infrastructure.

The absence of standardized, cross-border surveillance programs further compounds the problem. While WOAH provides notification frameworks for listed diseases, reporting is voluntary and subject to political and economic considerations. Underreporting is likely endemic, as the detection of a WOAH-listed pathogen can trigger trade restrictions that impose substantial costs on exporting nations. The finding that IMNV can be carried subclinically by P. monodon broodstock [7] and by alternative hosts such as M. rosenbergii [3] also means that conventional surveillance, which typically targets clinically affected P. vannamei, may systematically underestimate the true prevalence and distribution of the virus. Future surveillance efforts should adopt a multi-host, multi-species approach, incorporating environmental sampling and testing of non-target biota, in order to provide a more complete picture of IMNV epidemiology.

Synthesis: An Evolving Epidemiological Landscape

The global epidemiology of IMNV is not static but is being reshaped by ongoing anthropogenic, environmental, and evolutionary forces. The virus has transitioned from a geographically restricted pathogen to a transoceanic threat, and the evidence suggests that its geographic range is continuing to expand. The detection of IMNV in freshwater-reared shrimp in India [4] and in Egypt [21] within the past five years indicates that the virus has breached what were previously considered ecological or geographic barriers. The identification of subclinical infection in wild-caught P. monodon [7] and the demonstration of susceptibility in freshwater prawns [3] highlight the multiplicity of pathways through which IMNV can enter new production systems. Furthermore, the growing body of evidence linking environmental stressors, particularly temperature and density, to outbreak risk [17, 19] situates IMNV within the broader context of climate change and intensifying aquaculture practices.

The phylogeographic signals derived from genome sequencing underscore the dynamic nature of IMNV evolution. The observation of positive selection acting on viral proteins [1] and the emergence of distinct Brazilian and Indonesian lineages [11] raise the specter of immune escape, altered tissue tropism, or changes in virulence that could render current diagnostic tools or control strategies obsolete. The international research community must therefore prioritize sustained genomic surveillance, coupled with functional studies to assess the phenotypic consequences of observed genetic changes. From a regulatory standpoint, the WOAH listing of IMNV provides a framework for notification and control, but its effectiveness depends on the willingness of member states to invest in surveillance infrastructure and to report findings transparently. The economic stakes could scarcely be higher: with global shrimp aquaculture valued at tens of billions of dollars annually, and with IMNV capable of causing mortality rates exceeding 70% in naive populations, the cost of inaction, whether through continued geographic spread or through the emergence of more virulent or resistant strains, is measured in lost livelihoods, diminished food security, and destabilized markets. The epidemiological story

Diagnostic Approaches and Surveillance for Infectious Myonecrosis Virus (IMNV)

The global proliferation of Infectious Myonecrosis Virus (IMNV) within penaeid shrimp aquaculture necessitates a multi-tiered diagnostic architecture that integrates clinical observation, histopathological examination, molecular detection, and serological confirmation. The economic ramifications of this pathogen, estimated in billions of dollars in lost production [3], demand surveillance systems that are not only sensitive and specific but also adaptable to the diverse environmental and management conditions under which shrimp are cultivated. The World Organisation for Animal Health (WOAH) lists IMNV as a notifiable crustacean disease [8], underscoring the critical need for standardized diagnostic protocols across both endemic and at-risk regions.

Clinical and Gross Pathological Assessment as a Preliminary Screening Tool

The initial diagnostic phase in any IMNV surveillance program begins with the recognition of characteristic gross clinical signs. Infected Litopenaeus vannamei typically present with whitened, necrotic abdominal muscles, particularly in the distal segments, a condition that gives the appearance of "cooked shrimp" [21]. This whitening is distinct from other muscular pathologies and results from coagulative necrosis of striated muscle fibers. Importantly, the progression of clinical signs is influenced by environmental stressors; hyperthermia at 32-33°C significantly reduces the viral incubation period to as little as 2 days, compared to 5 days at 30°C, while simultaneously accelerating mortality [19]. Stocking density also modulates disease expression, with higher densities (400 shrimp/m²) correlating with a more rapid onset of clinical signs and elevated cumulative mortality [17].

However, reliance solely on gross pathology is fraught with diagnostic pitfalls. The condition known as muscle cramp syndrome, which results from handling stress or environmental shock, produces remarkably similar whitening of the tail musculature [13]. This phenomenon has historically led to false rumours of IMNV outbreaks in several Asian countries, where subsequent nested RT-PCR testing consistently returned negative results [13]. Thus, while clinical observation serves as a critical sentinel for triggering further investigation, it cannot serve as a standalone diagnostic tool. Any suspicious gross lesions must be confirmed through molecular or histopathological examination to distinguish true IMNV infection from non-infectious myopathies.

Histopathological Examination: Defining the Cellular Pathogenesis

Histopathology remains an indispensable adjunct for confirming IMNV infection and assessing disease severity at the tissue level. The hallmark histopathological lesions include multifocal coagulative necrosis of skeletal muscle fibers, accompanied by hemocytic infiltration and edema [20, 21]. In chronically affected animals, the lymphoid organ exhibits significant pathology, including the formation of spheroids, discrete, encapsulated aggregations of lymphoid cells that often harbor viral particles [20]. The hepatopancreas, while not the primary target organ, may display congestion and hemocytic infiltration, though these changes are less diagnostically specific [20].

The temporal evolution of histopathological damage is noteworthy. Studies comparing shrimp collected before and after two months of culture reveal significant differences in muscle and lymphoid organ condition, with advanced cases showing extensive replacement of necrotic muscle by fibrous connective tissue and more prominent spheroid formation in the lymphoid organ [20]. In Penaeus monodon, which may serve as asymptomatic carriers, histopathological findings such as hemocyte infiltration and muscle sinus dilation are observed even in the absence of gross clinical signs [7]. This subclinical pathology underscores the importance of histopathology in surveillance programs aimed at detecting carrier populations. Additionally, the observation of eosinophilic intranuclear inclusion bodies (Cowdry type A) in some infected specimens provides a pathognomonic, though not universally present, marker for viral infection [21].

Molecular Detection: The Cornerstone of Confirmatory Diagnostics

Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR) and Nested RT-PCR

The gold standard for IMNV confirmation is molecular detection of viral RNA, with nested reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (nRT-PCR) offering the highest sensitivity among conventional amplification methods. The nRT-PCR protocol targets conserved regions of the IMNV genome, typically within the open reading frame encoding the capsid protein or the RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp) [22, 24]. This technique has proven effective in detecting the virus across a wide range of host species and tissue types, including the abdominal muscle, lymphoid organ, gills, and heart [14].

The diagnostic sensitivity of nRT-PCR is exceptional, capable of detecting as few as 10⁰ copies/µL of the IMNV genome, a full log higher than the detection limit of conventional one-step RT-PCR [23]. This enhanced sensitivity is critical for identifying subclinical infections in carrier biota, such as the freshwater prawn Macrobrachium rosenbergii and various crustacean species inhabiting shrimp pond environments. A surveillance study in Banten, Indonesia, demonstrated that hermit crabs and barnacles collected from shrimp pond ecosystems tested positive for IMNV via nRT-PCR, confirming their role as potential mechanical vectors or reservoirs [2]. Similarly, wild-caught broodstock P. monodon from the Indian Ocean have tested positive for IMNV using PCR, despite appearing grossly normal, raising significant biosecurity concerns for hatchery operations [7].

Real-Time Quantitative RT-PCR (qRT-PCR)

Real-time RT-PCR offers the advantage of quantifying viral load, which is crucial for understanding infection dynamics and assessing the efficacy of intervention strategies. The assay provides cycle threshold (Ct) values that inversely correlate with viral copy number, allowing researchers to monitor the progression of infection over time. In the C6/36 mosquito cell line model, IMNV replication produced a Ct value of 22.25 at 10 days post-infection, compared to 35.21 at 2 days post-infection, demonstrating a clear temporal increase in viral RNA accumulation [31].

Field applications of qRT-PCR have revealed that IMNV loads in pond-reared shrimp can vary dramatically, correlating with environmental parameters such as water temperature, salinity, and dissolved oxygen [25, 26]. In intensive shrimp ponds in Kaur District, Indonesia, a prevalence of 31.94% was recorded using real-time PCR, with strong statistical correlations between IMNV prevalence and water quality parameters [25]. This quantitative approach also facilitates the differentiation of active replication from residual genomic RNA, as the former is associated with increasing or persistently high viral titers.

Isothermal Amplification Technologies: RT-ERA and RT-ERA-LFD

While PCR-based methods remain the reference standard, they require specialized thermal cycling equipment and skilled personnel, limiting their utility for on-site, point-of-care diagnostics in remote aquaculture facilities. The development of reverse transcription enzymatic recombinase amplification (RT-ERA) addresses this critical gap. This isothermal technique operates at a constant temperature of 38-42°C, eliminating the need for a thermocycler, and can produce results in under 30 minutes [23].

Two RT-ERA formats have been validated for IMNV detection: real-time RT-ERA, which monitors fluorescence accumulation in real time, and RT-ERA combined with lateral flow dipsticks (RT-ERA-LFD), which provides a visual readout suitable for field use. Both formats achieve a detection limit of 10¹ copies/µL, which is comparable to or better than conventional RT-PCR methods [23]. Critically, these assays demonstrate absolute specificity for IMNV, showing no cross-reactivity with other common shrimp pathogens, including White Spot Syndrome Virus (WSSV), Infectious Hypodermal and Hematopoietic Necrosis Virus (IHHNV), Enterocytozoon hepatopenaei (EHP), or Vibrio parahaemolyticus causing acute hepatopancreatic necrosis disease (AHPND) [23]. The RT-ERA-LFD format, in particular, represents a transformative tool for farm-level surveillance, enabling rapid decision-making regarding quarantine, harvest, or therapeutic intervention without the logistical delays of laboratory-based testing.

Serological and Immunohistochemical Approaches

Monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) targeting the IMNV capsid protein offer an alternative diagnostic modality, particularly for immunohistochemical localization of viral antigens within host tissues. Recombinant fragments of the capsid protein, designated CP-N (N-terminal), CP-I (internal), and CP-C (C-terminal), have been expressed in E. coli and used to generate specific MAbs [14]. Two MAbs against the CP-N fragment and one against the CP-C fragment have demonstrated utility in dot blotting, Western blotting, and immunohistochemistry.

The immunohistochemical application is particularly valuable for defining the tissue tropism of IMNV. MAb-based staining reveals intense viral antigen accumulation in striated muscle, lymphoid organ, gills, heart, hemocytes, and connective tissue [14]. This distribution pattern confirms the systemic nature of IMNV infection and explains the multisystemic pathology observed in advanced cases. Importantly, these MAbs show no cross-reactivity with other major shrimp viruses, including WSSV, Yellow Head Virus (YHV), Taura Syndrome Virus (TSV), and various densoviruses [14].

The detection sensitivity of the MAb-based dot blot assay is approximately 6-8 fmol/spot of recombinant protein, which is roughly 10-fold lower than that of one-step RT-PCR [14]. While this limits the utility of serological methods for detecting low-level or early-stage infections, their value lies in confirmatory testing of clinical cases and in research applications where spatial localization of viral antigen is required. Combining all three MAbs (anti-CP-N, anti-CP-I, and anti-CP-C) results in a twofold improvement in sensitivity compared to any single MAb, suggesting that a cocktail approach may enhance diagnostic performance [14].

Surveillance Frameworks and Epidemiological Considerations

Effective IMNV surveillance requires a risk-based, multi-stage sampling strategy that accounts for the spatial and temporal heterogeneity of infection within shrimp populations. The prevalence of IMNV in endemic areas varies widely, ranging from 11.11% in early outbreak sites in Situbondo, Indonesia [9], to over 44% in semi-intensive ponds in Bengkulu Tengah, Indonesia [26]. These variations are not random but are strongly correlated with environmental parameters, including water temperature, salinity fluctuations, and the presence of carrier organisms [2, 25, 26].

The role of asymptomatic carriers in IMNV epidemiology cannot be overstated. Multiple studies have documented the presence of IMNV in biota beyond penaeid shrimp. The giant freshwater prawn M. rosenbergii is susceptible to IMNV infection, exhibiting positive nested-PCR results, clinical signs, and histopathological lesions following intramuscular challenge, although mortality rates remain low [3]. This suggests that M. rosenbergii may function as a reservoir host, capable of perpetuating viral circulation in polyculture systems. Similarly, barnacles, hermit crabs, and other crustaceans inhabiting pond water and sediment can harbor the virus without exhibiting disease, serving as potential vectors for transmission between production cycles [2].

Water itself acts as a vehicle for viral dissemination. IMNV RNA has been detected in pond water and sediment samples proximate to infected farms, indicating that effluent discharge represents a pathway for environmental contamination [2]. This finding has profound implications for farm siting, water exchange protocols, and regulatory frameworks aimed at preventing the spread of IMNV between watersheds.

Genetic Characterization and Phylogenetic Surveillance

Beyond simple detection, modern surveillance programs must incorporate genetic characterization to track viral evolution and inform biosecurity measures. Sequencing of the IMNV RdRp gene and other genomic regions has revealed significant diversification between South American and Asian isolates. The prevailing hypothesis, supported by phylogenetic analyses, posits that IMNV originated in Brazil and was subsequently introduced to Indonesia, likely through the movement of live shrimp or contaminated products [1, 11]. From Indonesia, the virus appears to have dispersed to other Asian countries, with evidence of further genetic divergence among regional strains [9].

Comparative genomic analyses of Indonesian and Brazilian isolates reveal nucleotide identity ranging from 97.4% to 100% for the partial ORF1 sequence, while amino acid identity ranges from 97.6% to 100% [9]. These differences, though modest, are accompanied by distinct single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) across viral proteins, many of which are under positive selection pressure [1]. The majority of IMNV proteins show evidence of positive selection, suggesting that environmental factors, host immune responses, or both are driving viral adaptation [1]. For example, isolates from Lampung and Gresik, Indonesia, demonstrate 98.04-99.58% nucleotide homology with the Brazilian reference strain (AY570982) for the RdRp gene, with 100% amino acid identity for the Lampung isolate [12]. This conservation at the protein level suggests functional constraint on the RdRp, but the observed nucleotide changes could impact primer binding sites, potentially compromising diagnostic assays over time.

The practical implications of genetic diversification for diagnostics are significant. As IMNV continues to evolve, particularly in Asian epizootic zones, there is a risk that primers or probes designed against the original Brazilian isolate may exhibit reduced binding efficiency with divergent strains. Continuous surveillance involving periodic resequencing of circulating field strains is therefore essential to validate and, if necessary, redesign molecular diagnostic tools. The recent application of scientometric analysis to IMNV research literature reveals that molecular characterization and diagnostics remain central thematic clusters in the field, confirming the ongoing priority of refining detection methodologies [15].

Challenges and Limitations in Diagnostic Accuracy

Despite the array of available diagnostic tools, several challenges complicate accurate IMNV diagnosis. The phenomenon of false-positive clinical diagnoses due to muscle cramp syndrome has been well-documented, particularly in Asian countries outside Indonesia where IMNV has been rumored but not confirmed [13]. This reinforces the absolute necessity of molecular confirmation for any suspected outbreak. Conversely, false-negative PCR results can occur due to viral RNA degradation during sample storage and transport, the presence of PCR inhibitors in shrimp tissues, or genetic mismatches between primers and emerging viral strains.

The detection of IMNV in grossly normal broodstock of P. monodon from the Indian Ocean presents a particularly vexing biosecurity challenge [7]. These animals show no clinical signs yet harbor sufficient viral RNA to produce positive PCR amplicons with 99-100% sequence identity to known IMNV strains. This finding suggests that latent or low-level infections may be more common than previously recognized, and that reliance on clinical surveillance alone is inadequate for preventing the introduction of IMNV into new geographic regions.

Another layer of complexity arises from the potential for co-infections. IMNV has been detected concurrently with WSSV and EHP in shrimp reared in freshwater systems, and the presence of multiple pathogens can confound clinical diagnosis and alter disease progression [4]. Understanding the interactions between IMNV and other pathogens is an area requiring further investigation, as co-infections may influence viral load, tissue tropism, and host immune responses.

Recommendations for Integrated Diagnostic Protocols

A robust IMNV diagnostic and surveillance program should be tiered, beginning with routine clinical observation for white muscle necrosis, particularly following periods of environmental stress such as temperature spikes or handling. Any suspect animals should undergo histopathological examination of muscle, lymphoid organ, and hepatopancreas to confirm characteristic lesions. For definitive confirmation and quantification, molecular testing using nRT-PCR or qRT-PCR should be employed, with sequencing of the RdRp or capsid gene regions to monitor for genetic drift.

In resource-limited or field settings, RT-ERA-LFD provides a rapid, sensitive, and specific alternative that can be deployed without expensive equipment. Serological methods (MAb-based dot blot or immunohistochemistry) are best reserved for confirmatory testing of clinical cases or for research applications requiring spatial localization of viral antigen. Surveillance programs should target not only the primary host (L. vannamei) but also potential carrier species, including P. monodon, M. rosenbergii, and non-penaeid crustaceans inhabiting pond ecosystems.

Water quality monitoring should be integrated into surveillance protocols, given the documented correlations between environmental parameters and IMNV prevalence [25, 26]. Farms experiencing unexplained mortality with white muscle signs should immediately initiate diagnostic testing and, pending results, implement quarantine measures to prevent effluent release into surrounding waterways. The adoption of standardized reporting to WOAH and national veterinary authorities will facilitate the global tracking of IMNV epizootics and support coordinated response efforts.

Host Immune Response and Antiviral Interventions

1. Innate Immune Recognition and Transcriptional Reprogramming in IMNV Infection

The host response to Infectious Myonecrosis Virus (IMNV) is predominantly orchestrated through the innate immune system of penaeid shrimp, as these crustaceans lack adaptive immunity and rely on germline-encoded pattern recognition receptors and effector pathways. Transcriptional profiling of Penaeus vannamei experimentally challenged with IMNV reveals a coordinated but incompletely effective antiviral programme. A critical dimension of this response involves the RNA interference (RNAi) machinery, a primary antiviral defence mechanism in invertebrates. Feijó et al. [18] demonstrated that natural and experimental IMNV infection significantly upregulates the transcription of Sid-1, Dicer-2, and Argonaute-2 in white shrimp. Notably, Sid-1 expression emerged as a sensitive transcriptional marker of active viral replication, with its mRNA levels correlating with escalating viral inoculum concentrations. Despite this induction, the viral load did not diminish over the experimental period [18], suggesting that IMNV may possess mechanisms to subvert or overwhelm the RNAi pathway. This finding is particularly relevant given that the IMNV genome encodes a dsRNA-binding protein that could potentially interfere with Dicer processing or Argonaute loading, although this remains to be empirically validated.

Concurrently, IMNV infection drives a distinct pattern of stress- and immune-related gene expression. Nurhudah et al. [17] identified that genes encoding lectin and translationally controlled tumor protein (TCTP) were significantly upregulated in shrimp subjected to high stocking density stress combined with IMNV challenge, while the Toll receptor gene was markedly downregulated. Lectins serve as pattern recognition receptors that opsonise viral particles and activate prophenoloxidase cascades, while TCTP is a multifunctional protein implicated in cell survival and immune signalling. The downregulation of Toll receptor, a key upstream activator of the NF-κB-like pathway in shrimp, may represent either a viral strategy to dampen inflammatory responses or a consequence of cellular stress induced by high-density rearing [17]. These transcriptional changes underscore the intimate link between environmental stressors and immune competence, a theme of paramount importance for IMNV epizootiology as outlined by the World Organisation for Animal Health (WOAH) [8].

The histopathological hallmarks of IMNV infection, skeletal muscle necrosis, haemocyte infiltration, and lymphoid organ spheroids [20, 21], provide tissue-level correlates of the immune response. In the lymphoid organ, the formation of spheroids is interpreted as a chronic inflammatory lesion where haemocytes encapsulate viral debris, while in muscle, extensive haemocyte infiltration reflects attempt to clear necrotic tissue [20]. The detection of viral antigen via monoclonal antibodies specific to the capsid protein (CP-N and CP-C fragments) in fixed tissues reveals intense staining in muscles, lymphoid organ, gills, heart, and circulating haemocytes [14], confirming that these cells are both targets and effectors of the immune response. The lack of cross-reactivity with other major shrimp viruses, including white spot syndrome virus (WSSV) and Taura syndrome virus (TSV) [14], highlights the specificity of the anti-capsid humoral response that can be harnessed for diagnostic immunodetection.

2. Immunostimulatory Dietary Interventions: Harnessing Natural Products and Biologicals

Given the absence of conventional vaccines for crustaceans, much research effort has been directed toward enhancing non-specific immunity through dietary supplementation with immunostimulants. The evidence base for several natural compounds is now substantial and mechanistically informative.

2.1 Plant-Derived Immunostimulants

Subaidah et al. [16] reported that dietary inclusion of Lonicera japonica (honeysuckle) water extract at 2% w/w significantly improved survival and immune parameters in L. vannamei following intramuscular IMNV challenge. Shrimp receiving this dose exhibited elevated hemolymph profiles and reduced clinical signs compared to unsupplemented controls, suggesting that bioactive compounds, likely polyphenols and flavonoids, act as immunomodulators that prime haemocyte activity and antimicrobial peptide synthesis. Similarly, Jha et al. [27] demonstrated that ethanolic extract of Cynodon dactylon (Bermuda grass) incorporated into feed at concentrations of 10–25% yielded up to 98% survival in shrimp fed IMNV-infected meat. While the mechanism remains incompletely defined, C. dactylon extracts are known to contain alkaloids and saponins with documented antiviral activity in other aquatic species, and their efficacy against IMNV likely involves both direct virucidal effects and stimulation of phagocytic haemocytes.

2.2 Marine-Derived Immunostimulants

Squid (Loligo spp.) ink powder has emerged as a potent, sustainable immunostimulant for shrimp aquaculture. Fadjar et al. [10] fed L. vannamei diets supplemented with squid ink at 400, 500, or 600 mg/kg and then challenged them via IMNV immersion. The 500 mg/kg dose produced the most robust immune enhancement: total haemocyte count (THC) reached 6 × 10⁵ cells/mL, respiratory burst activity increased to 1.13 OD, superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity rose to 0.98 U/mL, and phenoloxidase (PO) activity reached 0.619 OD. Crucially, ribonucleotide reductase (RR) expression, a surrogate marker of viral replication, was markedly suppressed [10]. Differential haemocyte counts revealed elevated granulocyte and semi-granulocyte percentages, indicative of heightened immunological surveillance. This study aligns with prior work by Saraswati et al. [32], who demonstrated that injection of hot-water extract from the diatom Chaetoceros ceratosporum at 15 µg/g body weight enhanced THC, total plasma protein, PO activity, and respiratory burst in IMNV-challenged shrimp, achieving survival rates comparable to uninfected controls. Both studies underscore the principle that nonspecific immune activation can confer protection even in the face of high viral pressure.

2.3 β-Glucans and Yeast-Derived Compounds

β-1,3/1,6-glucans, structural polysaccharides from yeast cell walls, are among the best-characterized shrimp immunostimulants. Neto and Nunes [29] supplemented L. vannamei diets with 1,000 mg/kg β-glucan and challenged shrimp per os with IMNV-positive tissue homogenate. Treated shrimp achieved 48.1% survival, significantly higher than the 23.2% observed in challenged controls fed a basal diet, and this survival benefit occurred without evidence of immunological fatigue or growth depression over 10 weeks. Total haemocyte counts were significantly affected by both treatment and sampling time, although serum protein and PO activity did not differ across groups, suggesting that β-glucan primarily enhances cellular rather than humoral responses [29]. The absence of immunosuppression after prolonged feeding is particularly important for commercial applications where continuous dietary administration is logistically favourable.

3. Probiotic and Synbiotic Interventions: Modulating the Microbiome-Immune Axis

The gut microbiome of penaeid shrimp plays a fundamental role in immune maturation and pathogen exclusion. Widanarni et al. [30] evaluated Bacillus NP5, a spore-forming probiotic, supplemented in feed at 10², 10⁴, or 10⁶ CFU/g for 30 days before intramuscular IMNV challenge. The highest dose (10⁶ CFU/g) produced the greatest improvements in daily growth rate, feed conversion ratio, total haemocyte count, and survival relative to infected controls. Bacillus species are known to secrete exoenzymes, bacteriocins, and lipopeptides that can inactivate enveloped viruses directly, while also stimulating haemocyte proliferation and prophenoloxidase activation through microbe-associated molecular patterns (MAMPs) recognised by host Toll-like receptors. Importantly, the authors noted that probiotic supplementation significantly enhanced immune responses even before challenge, indicating a proactive priming effect [30].

Synbiotic formulations, combining probiotics with prebiotic substrates, offer further benefits. Widanarni et al. [28] tested a synbiotic comprising the probiotic Vibrio alginolyticus SKT-b and oligosaccharides extracted from sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas) in L. vannamei fed daily, twice weekly, or weekly for 30 days before IMNV challenge. Daily supplementation yielded a 50% higher survival rate than the positive control, along with superior immune parameters including THC and PO activity. The prebiotic component likely enhances colonisation and metabolic activity of the probiotic, amplifying production of short-chain fatty acids and other immunomodulatory metabolites. These findings align with WOAH-recommended biosecurity practices that emphasise gut health as a first line of defence against viral pathogens [8].

4. Environmental Stressors and Immune Modulation: Temperature, Density, and Chemical Interventions

Environmental conditions profoundly shape the host-virus interface, primarily through stress-induced immunosuppression. Za et al. [19] investigated the effect of hyperthermia on IMNV pathogenesis in L. vannamei maintained at 30, 31, 32, or 33°C post-infection. Survival declined sharply with increasing temperature: 51.1% at 30°C, 48.9% at 31°C, 28.9% at 32°C, and 24.4% at 33°C. Critically, the incubation period shortened from 5 days at 30°C to only 2 days at 33°C [19], demonstrating that thermal stress accelerates viral replication and disease progression. This has direct implications for pond management during summer months or in regions subject to climate change, as outlined in FAO aquaculture guidelines. Elevated temperatures are known to upregulate heat shock proteins (HSPs) that can inadvertently chaperone viral proteins or suppress apoptosis, thereby facilitating viral propagation.

Stocking density is an equally potent modulator of immune competence. Nurhudah et al. [17] found that shrimp reared at 400 shrimp/m² exhibited the fastest onset of clinical IMNV signs and the highest cumulative mortality, with upregulation of lectin and TCTP but downregulation of Toll receptor. The transcriptional signature at high density suggests a state of chronic stress that skews immune resources toward acute-phase responses while compromising pathogen recognition pathways. This observation reinforces WOAH recommendations for maintaining optimal stocking densities as a non-pharmacological disease control measure.

Chemical interventions have also been explored, though with caution. Jha et al. [6] reported that chlorine-based compounds provided measurable protection against IMNV in laboratory and farm settings, likely through direct virucidal activity in water and on fomites. Additionally, essential oil blends (e.g., PondGuard) and biological control using tilapia, which consumes infected moribund shrimp and interrupts horizontal transmission, showed significant protection [6]. These integrated pest management approaches, while not directly immunostimulatory, reduce pathogen pressure and allow the host immune system to operate more effectively.

5. Carriers, Reservoirs, and the Role of Non-Penaeid Hosts in Immune Ecology

Understanding the host range of IMNV is critical for designing effective biosecurity programmes. Silva et al. [3] provided the first experimental demonstration that Macrobrachium rosenbergii (giant freshwater prawn) subadults and adults are susceptible to IMNV via intramuscular injection. Infected prawns exhibited positive nested RT-PCR, haemocyte infiltration, and muscle sinus dilation, though mortality was not massive. This subclinical carrier state is epidemiologically dangerous: asymptomatic M. rosenbergii can shed virus into water or serve as prey for cannibalistic shrimp, perpetuating transmission cycles. Similarly, Srisala et al. [7] detected IMNV by PCR in grossly normal wild Penaeus monodon broodstock captured from the Indian Ocean, with 99–100% sequence identity to known strains. These findings highlight that carrier biota, including crab, barnacle, and water samples from pond effluents [2], can act as viral reservoirs, and that immune responses in these species may be insufficient to clear infection but sufficient to prevent clinical disease.

The implications for antiviral strategy are twofold: first, surveillance programmes must extend beyond target species to include potential carriers using sensitive molecular tools such as nested RT-PCR [22-24] or recombinase polymerase amplification (ERA) assays [23]; second, any immunostimulatory intervention must be robust enough to overcome the inherent susceptibility of penaeids, where viral replication in haemocytes and lymphoid tissues can overwhelm even primed defences. The development of monoclonal antibodies against IMNV capsid proteins [14] has provided a valuable tool for both research and field diagnostics, enabling immunohistochemical localisation of viral antigen in carrier tissues and facilitating studies of host-pathogen dynamics at the cellular level.

Current Research Trends and Future Directions

The research landscape surrounding Infectious Myonecrosis Virus (IMNV) has undergone a pronounced transformation over the past decade, shifting from foundational characterization toward a multifaceted, interdisciplinary effort that integrates molecular epidemiology, advanced diagnostics, host–pathogen immunology, environmental risk assessment, and novel therapeutic interventions. As a pathogen listed by the World Organisation for Animal Health (WOAH, formerly OIE) and recognized by the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) as a significant threat to global shrimp aquaculture, IMNV continues to drive urgent research aimed at mitigating its economic and ecological impacts. The following analysis delineates the major contemporary research trajectories and identifies critical knowledge gaps that will shape future investigations.

Molecular Epidemiology and Viral Evolutionary Dynamics

A dominant and rapidly evolving research theme concerns the molecular epidemiology and phylogeographic history of IMNV. Scientometric analyses have revealed that IMNV research exhibits more established international collaborative networks compared to emerging viral threats such as Decapod Iridescent Virus 1 (DIV1), yet significant gaps in cross-border cooperation persist, particularly involving regions in South America and Southeast Asia that are most heavily affected [15]. The foundational hypothesis that IMNV originated in Brazil and subsequently spread to Indonesia, and from there to other Asian nations, has been substantially reinforced by recent comprehensive genomic analyses. Studies examining single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and haplotype diversity across multiple IMNV strains have documented a striking diversification, with Asian isolates displaying far greater haplotype richness than their South American counterparts [1]. This pattern strongly supports a founder-effect model wherein a limited number of Brazilian lineages were introduced to Indonesia, where they encountered distinct environmental pressures and host populations, driving accelerated genetic divergence.

Critically, the majority of IMNV-encoded proteins are under positive selection pressure, suggesting that the virus is actively adapting to its host environments, particularly in Asia [1]. This finding carries profound implications for vaccine development, diagnostic assay design, and the durability of any future control measures. For example, the capsid protein, a primary target for monoclonal antibody-based detection, exhibits amino acid substitutions between Brazilian and Indonesian isolates that could theoretically reduce antibody binding affinity [9, 11]. Comparative genomic analyses of the RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp) coding region have further demonstrated that Indonesian isolates from Lampung and Gresik share 98–99% nucleotide identity with the Brazilian reference strain, but the presence of even minor genetic drift in this highly conserved enzyme warrants continuous surveillance [12]. The most recent phylogenetic reconstructions, incorporating complete genome sequences from multiple Indonesian strains, have confirmed a clear bifurcation between the Brazilian and Indonesian clades, with evidence of further sub-lineage formation within Indonesia [11]. For the future, the establishment of a globally coordinated, real-time genomic surveillance network, analogous to those used for influenza virus or SARS-CoV-2, would enable early detection of emerging strains with altered virulence, transmissibility, or antigenicity. The integration of phylodynamic modeling with environmental and farm-management metadata could also provide predictive insights into outbreak risk and spread patterns across the Asia-Pacific region.

Advanced Diagnostics and Point-of-Care Detection

The development of rapid, field-deployable, and highly sensitive diagnostic tools remains a cornerstone of IMNV research, driven by the practical necessity of early detection to prevent catastrophic losses in shrimp farms. Conventional nested reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (nRT-PCR) has long been the gold standard, and recent studies continue to demonstrate its efficacy for routine surveillance in endemic regions such as Indonesia, where it successfully identified IMNV in samples from Central Kalimantan and East Java [22, 24]. However, the limitations of PCR, including the need for thermocyclers, skilled personnel, and extended turnaround times, have spurred innovation in isothermal amplification technologies. The development of reverse transcription enzymatic recombinase amplification (RT-ERA) assays represents a paradigm shift, offering the ability to detect IMNV at temperatures between 38–42°C with a sensitivity of 10¹ copies/μL, which is comparable to or better than real-time RT-PCR (10² copies/μL) and only one order of magnitude less sensitive than nested RT-PCR (10⁰ copies/μL) [23]. The coupling of RT-ERA with lateral flow dipsticks (RT-ERA-LFD) provides a visual, equipment-free readout that can be performed directly on farms, dramatically reducing the time from sample collection to result [23]. These assays exhibit no cross-reactivity with other major shrimp pathogens, including Vibrio parahaemolyticus (causing AHPND), white spot syndrome virus (WSSV), infectious hypodermal and hematopoietic necrosis virus (IHHNV), or Enterocytozoon hepatopenaei (EHP), underscoring their specificity [23].

Looking ahead, the integration of microfluidic "lab-on-a-chip" platforms with these isothermal amplification chemistries could further miniaturize and automate detection, enabling simultaneous screening for multiple pathogens from a single sample. Additionally, the application of CRISPR-based diagnostic systems (e.g., SHERLOCK or DETECTR) for IMNV detection is a logical next step, as these platforms offer attomolar sensitivity and can be lyophilized for long-term storage without cold chains. The validation of these next-generation tools across diverse geographical settings and shrimp life stages will be essential for regulatory approval and widespread adoption.

Host–Pathogen Interactions and Innate Immune Mechanisms

A deeper understanding of the molecular interplay between IMNV and its penaeid hosts is emerging as a vibrant research frontier, with implications for both biomarker development and immunostimulant design. The shrimp innate immune system relies heavily on pattern recognition receptors, the prophenoloxidase cascade, and RNA interference (RNAi) pathways. Recent transcriptional profiling has revealed that IMNV infection induces significant upregulation of key RNAi pathway genes, including Sid-1 (involved in systemic RNAi spreading), Dicer-2 (the initiator of siRNA biogenesis), and Argonaute-2 (the effector of the RNA-induced silencing complex) [18]. Intriguingly, despite this elevated transcriptional activity, viral loads did not decrease over the course of infection, suggesting either that the RNAi response is insufficient to clear the virus or that IMNV encodes a suppressor of RNAi that blunts the antiviral effect [18]. The expression level of Sid-1 mRNA has been proposed as a sensitive marker of viral replication, potentially useful for assessing the sanitary status of shrimp populations in real time [18].

In parallel, investigations into stress-related gene expression have demonstrated that stocking density, a proxy for chronic physiological stress, profoundly modulates the immune transcriptome. Shrimp reared at high densities (400 shrimp/m²) and subsequently challenged with IMNV exhibited the fastest onset of clinical signs and the highest cumulative mortality [17]. This phenotypic outcome correlated with the upregulation of lectin and translationally controlled tumor protein (TCTP) genes, alongside the downregulation of Toll receptor expression [17]. Lectins are crucial for pathogen opsonization and activation of the prophenoloxidase system, while TCTP has been implicated in cell survival and stress responses; their coordinated upregulation likely represents a compensatory immune effort. Conversely, Toll receptor downregulation may indicate immune exhaustion or active suppression by the virus, representing a potential target for therapeutic intervention. Future research should employ transcriptomic (RNA-seq) and proteomic approaches to map the complete signaling networks activated by IMNV, with particular attention to the crosstalk between the RNAi pathway, the Toll/IMD pathways, and the prophenoloxidase cascade. Functional validation using double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) knockdown or CRISPR-mediated gene editing in shrimp primary cell cultures or in vivo would be invaluable for identifying critical host factors that could be manipulated to enhance resistance.

Environmental Drivers, Host Range Expansion, and Ecological Epidemiology

The recognition that IMNV is not solely a pathogen of Penaeus vannamei has broadened the scope of ecological and epidemiological research. A landmark study recently demonstrated, for the first time, the experimental susceptibility of the giant freshwater prawn Macrobrachium rosenbergii subadults and adults to IMNV via intramuscular challenge [3]. Although challenged prawns did not exhibit massive mortalities, all tested individuals became positive by nested RT-PCR and displayed characteristic histopathological lesions, including hemocyte infiltration and muscle sinus dilation [3]. This finding is of immense practical significance, as M. rosenbergii is frequently cultured in inland waters that are increasingly used for P. vannamei farming, creating opportunities for cross-species viral transmission. Similarly, the detection of IMNV in wild-caught broodstock of Penaeus monodon from the Indian Ocean, animals that appeared grossly normal, raises the alarming possibility that asymptomatic carriers may serve as vectors for viral introduction into hatcheries and farms [7]. The presence of IMNV has also been documented in non-penaeid carrier biota, including hermit crabs and barnacles collected from the vicinity of shrimp ponds, as well as in pond water and sediment, indicating an environmental reservoir that can perpetuate infection cycles even in the absence of overtly diseased shrimp [2].

Environmental temperature has emerged as a critical abiotic factor driving IMNV pathogenesis. Controlled challenge experiments have demonstrated that hyperthermia (water temperatures of 32–33°C) significantly reduces the incubation period of IMNV from 5 days at 30°C to just 2 days, while simultaneously increasing cumulative mortality from approximately 49–51% to 71–76% [19]. This temperature-dependent acceleration of disease progression is likely mediated by increased metabolic rates in both host and virus, as well as the suppression of temperature-sensitive immune components. Conversely, low-salinity environments (0 ppt) have been shown to support IMNV infection in P. vannamei, with experimentally infected shrimp exhibiting 100% mortality even in freshwater, challenging the long-held assumption that IMNV is strictly a marine or brackish-water pathogen [4]. In numerous Indonesian provinces, water quality parameters (including temperature, dissolved oxygen, pH, and ammonia) have been found to correlate strongly with IMNV prevalence rates ranging from 31% to 44%, underscoring the multifactorial nature of disease outbreaks [25, 26]. Future research must prioritize the development of predictive risk models that integrate real-time environmental monitoring (e.g., via Internet-of-Things sensors) with viral surveillance data, enabling farmers to implement preemptive mitigation strategies, such as temperature regulation, reduced stocking densities, or enhanced biosecurity, before clinical outbreaks manifest.

Novel Control Strategies: Immunostimulants, Probiotics, and Phytotherapeutics

The dearth of effective antiviral chemotherapeutics for use in aquaculture has intensified the search for alternative, sustainable control measures. A major and highly productive research trend involves the evaluation of natural immunostimulants, probiotics, prebiotics, and synbiotics for their ability to bolster shrimp innate immunity and reduce IMNV-associated mortality. Beta-glucans, particularly β-1,3/1,6-glucan derived from yeast or fungal cell walls, have been extensively studied. Dietary supplementation with β-1,3/1,6-glucan at 1,000 mg/kg significantly improved survival of P. vannamei following oral challenge with IMNV, from 23% in unsupplemented controls to 48%, without evidence of immunological fatigue over a 10-week feeding period [29]. The mechanism of action appears to involve activation of the prophenoloxidase system and enhanced phagocytic activity, though total hemocyte counts and serum protein levels were variably affected [29].

Probiotic bacteria, particularly Gram-positive species such as Bacillus NP5, have demonstrated remarkable efficacy. Shrimp fed a diet supplemented with Bacillus NP5 at 10⁶ CFU/g exhibited significantly higher daily growth rates, improved feed conversion ratios, elevated total hemocyte counts, and dramatically enhanced resistance to IMNV challenge compared to unsupplemented controls [30]. Synbiotic preparations combining the probiotic Vibrio alginolyticus SKT-b with prebiotic oligosaccharides from sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas) have yielded similar benefits, with daily administration achieving a 50% higher survival rate than untreated, infected shrimp [28]. The underlying mechanisms are likely multifactorial, including competitive exclusion of pathogens, production of antimicrobial metabolites, and direct modulation of host immune gene expression.

Phytobiotics and marine-derived compounds represent another burgeoning avenue. Dietary supplementation with Lonicera japonica (honeysuckle) water extract at 2% (w/w) significantly improved survival and immune parameters following IMNV injection, suggesting that polyphenolic compounds such as chlorogenic acid may directly inhibit viral replication or enhance host antiviral responses [16]. Ethanolic extracts of Cynodon dactylon (Bermuda grass) incorporated into feed at 20–25% concentrations led to survival rates as high as 98% in IMNV-challenged shrimp, a finding that warrants rigorous dose-response and mechanistic studies [27]. Most recently, squid (Loligo spp.) ink powder at 500 mg/kg feed was shown to significantly enhance total hemocyte counts, respiratory burst activity, phenoloxidase activity, superoxide dismutase levels, and phagocytic activity, while concurrently reducing the expression of ribonucleotide reductase (a key enzyme for viral DNA replication) in IMNV-infected shrimp [10]. This breadth of activity, simultaneously stimulating multiple arms of the innate immune system while directly suppressing viral replication, suggests that squid ink contains a complex mixture of bioactive molecules (e.g., melanin, polysaccharides, peptides) with therapeutic potential.

Hot water extracts of the marine diatom Chaetoceros ceratosporum have also been shown to enhance immune parameters and survival when administered via injection at 15 μg/g body weight [32]. The industrialization of such approaches, for example, through cost-effective mass culture of diatoms or extraction of squid ink from fishery byproducts, could make these interventions economically viable for commercial shrimp farms. For every immunostimulant, future research must rigorously determine optimal dosage, delivery route (feed vs. immersion vs. injection), treatment duration, and potential for cumulative toxicity or immunosuppression with prolonged use. Furthermore, field trials under commercial farming conditions, with natural (rather than experimental) IMNV challenge, are essential to validate laboratory findings.

Histopathological Characterization and Tissue-Specific Pathogenesis

While much research has focused on molecular detection and immune modulation, the histopathological characterization of IMNV remains an active and informative area. Detailed examination of P. vannamei samples collected at different culture durations from Indonesian sites (Aceh, Sidoarjo, Probolinggo, and Lampung) has confirmed that the hallmark lesion, skeletal muscle necrosis with associated hemocyte infiltration, intensifies over time, with significant differences in muscle and lymphoid organ pathology observed between shrimp before and after two months of culture [20]. In the lymphoid organ, the formation of spheroids (aggregates of hypertrophied, necrotic cells) is a consistent feature, while hepatopancreatic changes, including congestion and hemocytic infiltration, are also present but less diagnostically specific [20]. Recently, the first experimental demonstration of IMNV susceptibility in M. rosenbergii included detailed histopathological documentation of hemocyte infiltration and muscle sinus dilation, confirming that the virus can replicate and cause tissue damage in this non-penaeid species [3]. Additionally, the development of monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) directed against the N- and C-terminal fragments of the IMNV capsid protein has enabled immunohistochemical localization of viral antigen in muscle, lymphoid organ, gills, heart, hemocytes, and connective tissue, providing a powerful tool for studying viral tropism and dissemination [14]. Future investigations should employ quantitative digital pathology and in situ hybridization to map the spatial and temporal progression of viral infection within individual shrimp, correlating lesion severity with viral load and clinical outcome.

Integrative, Multi-Omics, and Systems Biology Approaches

The next frontier in IMNV research lies in the adoption of systems biology and multi-omics approaches to unravel the complexity of host–virus interactions. Transcriptomic studies using RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) have the potential to identify entire networks of differentially expressed genes, including those involved in metabolism, apoptosis, cytoskeletal reorganization, and antiviral signaling. Proteomic and metabolomic profiling of hemolymph and target tissues could reveal biomarkers of early infection or resistance, as well as metabolic vulnerabilities that might be exploited therapeutically. Epigenetic modifications, such as DNA methylation and histone acetylation, are known to play roles in shrimp immune memory (often referred to as "immune priming") and could be modulated to enhance long-term resistance to IMNV. The integration of such datasets into predictive computational models would allow researchers to simulate the effects of environmental stressors, nutritional interventions, or genetic selection on disease outcomes, thereby accelerating the identification of optimal management strategies.

Future Directions and Unresolved Challenges

Despite substantial progress, several critical research gaps remain. First, the lack of a continuous, susceptible shrimp cell line has severely hampered efforts to study IMNV replication kinetics, screen antiviral compounds, and produce attenuated vaccine strains. While the C6/36 mosquito cell line has been shown to support IMNV propagation and produce infectious virus capable of causing mortality in shrimp, this system is not derived from penaeid tissue and may not faithfully recapitulate the in vivo host–virus interactions [31]. The development of a permanent penaeid cell line, from hematopoietic tissue, lymphoid organ, or embryonic stem cells, remains a top priority.

Second, the efficacy and safety of RNA interference-based therapeutics, such as sequence-specific dsRNA or siRNA targeting essential viral genes (e.g., the RdRp or capsid protein), need to be evaluated under field conditions. While laboratory studies have demonstrated that injection of dsRNA can protect shrimp against related viruses like WSSV, the cost, stability, and delivery of RNAi therapeutics for IMNV in commercial-scale ponds present formidable challenges. The exploration of nanoparticle-based delivery systems (e.g., chitosan or lipid nanoparticles) that can be incorporated into feed may provide a practical solution.

Third, the role of vertical transmission, from infected broodstock to offspring, remains poorly understood. The detection of IMNV in wild-caught, grossly normal P. monodon suggests that broodstock may be a cryptic source of viral introduction into hatcheries [7]. Systematic screening of broodstock populations, combined with studies on the localization of viral particles in ovarian or spermatophore tissues, is urgently needed to inform biosecurity protocols for hatcheries.

Fourth, the economic and social dimensions of IMNV control are under-researched. Scientometric analyses have highlighted the underrepresentation of social science and economic research in the IMNV literature [15]. Understanding the cost-benefit ratios of various intervention strategies (e.g., immunostimulants, probiotics, water temperature management, stocking density reduction) and the barriers to their adoption by smallholder farmers in developing countries will be essential for translating scientific discoveries into real-world impact. Policy frameworks that incentivize biosecurity investments, promote the use of specific pathogen-free (SPF) post-larvae, and support emergency response mechanisms are sorely needed, particularly in regions like Southeast Asia and South America where IMNV is

References

[1] Viana JT, Freitas JOd, Rocha RdS, Maggioni R. Viral mutations and their implications for genetic diversity of the Infectious Myonecrosis Virus (IMNV).. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology. 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jip.2025.108325

[2] Yudha IG, Choiri MF, Indriasih I, Hasani Q, Kesuma AH. THE SPREAD OF INFECTIOUS MYONECROSIS VIRUS (IMNV) IN CARRIERS BIOTA AND WATERS AT SHRIMP POND IN ANYER AND CARITA COASTAL, BANTEN PROVINCE. Jurnal Perikanan Unram. 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29303/jp.v14i3.893

[3] Silva SPAd, Santos FLd, Silva SMBCd. Experimental susceptibility of Macrobrachium rosenbergii (de Man) subadults and adults to infectious myonecrosis virus (IMNV). Veterinary research communications. 2026. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11259-025-11045-8

[4] Suryakodi S, Ahmed AN, Badhusha A, Kumar SS, Sivakumar S, Majeed SA, et al.. First report on the occurrence of white spot syndrome virus, infectious myonecrosis virus and Enterocytozoon hepatopenaei in Penaeus vannamei reared in freshwater systems.. Journal of Fish Diseases. 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jfd.13595

[5] . infectious myonecrosis virus. CABI Compendium. 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1079/cabicompendium.121666

[6] Jha R, Babikian H, Kristina, Srisombat S. Managing infectious myonecrosis virus (IMNV) in Vannamei shrimp culture: Learning by doing. International Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Studies. 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22271/FISH.2021.V9.I1E.2424

[7] Srisala J, Sanguanrut P, Laiphrom S, Siriwattano J, Khudet J, Thaiue D, et al.. Infectious myonecrosis virus (IMNV) and decapod iridescent virus 1 (DIV1) detected in Penaeus monodon from the Indian Ocean. bioRxiv. 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.09.19.304972

[8] Shyam K, Jeena K, Paniprasad K, Rathore G, Tripathi G. Surveillance for infectious myonecrosis virus in Indian shrimp aquaculture. Indian Journal of Fisheries. 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21077/ijf.2017.64.2.66887-11

[9] Zaujat RC, Setiyaningsih S, Lusiastuti AM. Prevalensi dan Karakterisasi Molekuler Infectious Myonecrosis Virus (IMNV) di Sentra Budidaya Udang Vaname (Litopenaeus Vannamei) Propinsi Banten. . 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29244/AVI.4.2.88-96

[10] Fadjar M, Kühn H, Ramadhani A, Aisyah D, Herlina C, Affandi RI, et al.. Innovative use of squid (Loligo spp.) ink powder as a potent immunostimulant for vannamei shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei) in the treatment of infectious myonecrosis. Veterinary World. 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2025.1777-1788

[11] Naim S, Brown JK, Nibert M. Genetic diversification of penaeid shrimp infectious myonecrosis virus between Indonesia and Brazil. Virus Research. 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.virusres.2014.05.013

[12] Sudjito YL, Handayani CR, Kusumaningrum HP, Budiharjo A. Karakterisasi Genetik Fragmen Gen Penyandi RNA Polimerase Infectious Myonecrosis Virus (IMNV) yang Menginfeksi Udang Vannamei (Litopenaeus vannamei Boone.) dari Lampung, Gresik dan Pontianak. . 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/BIOMA.16.1.18-25

[13] Senapin S, Phiwsaiya K, Gangnonngiw W, Flegel T. False rumours of disease outbreaks caused by infectious myonecrosis virus (IMNV) in the whiteleg shrimp in Asia. Journal of Negative Results in Biomedicine. 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-5751-10-10

[14] Kunanopparat A, Chaivisuthangkura P, Senapin S, Longyant S, Rukpratanporn S, Flegel T, et al.. Detection of infectious myonecrosis virus using monoclonal antibody specific to N and C fragments of the capsid protein expressed heterologously.. Journal of Virological Methods. 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jviromet.2010.10.015

[15] Saravanan K, Rathinam R, Iburahim SA, Praveenraj J, Kiruba-Sankar R, Kumar G. Dissection of Emerging Shrimp Viruses Through Scientometric Assessment: Insights into Infectious Myonecrosis Virus (IMNV) and Decapod Iridescent Virus 1 (DIV1). Viruses. 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/v17081115

[16] Subaidah S, Sumarwan J, Marzuqi M, Tridjoko T, Slamet B, Budi DS, et al.. Dietary Honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica) Extract Enhances Resistance to Infectious Myonecrosis Virus in Whiteleg Shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei). Jurnal Medika Veterinaria. 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20473/jmv.vol8.iss2.2025.286-296

[17] Nurhudah M, Baladrat NK, Rahardjo S, Utari HB, Wiradana PA. Effect of Stocking Density on Stress-Related Gene Expression of Pacific White Shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei) Infected with Infectious Myonecrosis Virus (IMNV). Jurnal Medika Veterinaria. 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20473/jmv.vol7.iss2.2024.276-291

[18] Feijó RG, Viana J, Maggioni R, Marins LF. Infectious myonecrosis virus (IMNV) induces upregulation of RNAi-related genes in white shrimp Penaeus vannamei.. Developmental and Comparative Immunology. 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dci.2024.105296

[19] Za IFS, Zaidy AB, Sugama K, Hasan S, Fitriadi R, Ihtifazhuddin MI, et al.. The Effect of Temperature on Survival Rate of White leg Shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei) Infected with Infectious Myonecrosis Virus. World's Veterinary Journal. 2026. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54203/scil.2026.wvj3

[20] Puspitasari I, Suseno D, Yudana IGR, Anwar MK, Kelautan P, Sidoarjo P. Histopathological condition of Litopenaeus vannamei infected with Infectious Myonecrosis Virus (IMNV) on different days of culture collected from Aceh, Sidoarjo, Probolinggo and Lampung Indonesia. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environment. 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1273/1/012083

[21] Aly S, Mansour S, Thabet RY, Mabrok M. Studies on infectious myonecrosis virus (IMNV) and infectious hypodermal and hematopoietic necrosis virus (IHHNV) in cultured penaeid shrimp in Egypt.. Diseases of Aquatic Organisms. 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3354/dao03556

[22] Amalliyah HN, Hakimah N, Sugianti B. DETECTION OF INFECTIOUS MYONECROSIS VIRUS (IMNV) IN LITOPENAEUS VANNAMEI USING NESTED REVERSE TRANSCRIPTION-POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION (PCR) AT PT. CENTRAL PROTEINA PRIMA SIDOARJO EAST JAVA. Jurnal Perikanan Unram. 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29303/jp.v15i2.1446

[23] Zhang L, Zhou Q, Liu J, Liu M, Hu J, Bao Z, et al.. Development of recombinase amplification assays for the rapid detection of infectious myonecrosis virus.. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology. 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jip.2024.108143

[24] Maharani D, Sumsanto M. PCR (Polymerase Chain Reaction) Method As A Detector of IMNV (Infectious myonecrosis virus) Disease in Vaname Shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei). Journal of Fish Health. 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29303/jfh.v4i4.5934

[25] Widodo A, Johan Y, Brata B, Suherman D. HUBUNGAN PARAMETER LINGKUNGAN DENGAN PREVALENSI Infectious Myonecrosis Virus DI TAMBAK INTENSIF UDANG VANNAMEI (Litopenaeus vannamei) KABUPATEN KAUR. Naturalis. 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31186/NATURALIS.10.1.17285

[26] Kasman K. HUBUNGAN PARAMETER LINGKUNGAN DENGAN PREVALENSI Infectious Myonecrosis Virus DI TAMBAK SEMI INTENSIF UDANG VANAME (Litopenaeus vannamei) KABUPATEN BENGKULU TENGAH. Naturalis. 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31186/NATURALIS.10.1.18160

[27] Jha R, Wisoyo SD, Kristina, Srisombat S. Study on the efficacy of Cynodon dactylon against Infectious Myonecrosis Virus (IMNV) in Penaeus vannamei. bioRxiv. 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.11.09.374074

[28] Widanarni W, Sukenda S, Septiani GR. APLIKASI SINBIOTIK UNTUK PENCEGAHAN INFEKSI INFECTIOUS MYONECROSIS VIRUS PADA UDANG VANAME (Litopenaeus vannamei) (Synbiotic Application for Prevention of Infectious Myonecrosis Virus Infection in White Shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei)). Jurnal Kedokteran Hewan. 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21157/J.KED.HEWAN.V10I2.5041

[29] Neto HS, Nunes A. Performance and immunological resistance of Litopenaeus vannamei fed a β-1,3/1,6-glucan-supplemented diet after per os challenge with the Infectious myonecrosis virus (IMNV). Revista Brasileira De Zootecnia. 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1806-92902015000500001

[30] Widanarni W, Yuhana M, Muhammad A. Bacillus NP5 Improves Growth Performance and Resistance Against Infectious Myonecrosis Virus in White Shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei) (Bacillus NP5 Meningkatkan Pertumbuhan dan Ketahanan Terhadap Infeksi Virus Myonecrosis pada Udang Putih (L. vannamei). ILMU KELAUTAN: Indonesian Journal of Marine Sciences. 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/IK.IJMS.19.4.211-218

[31] Kumar SS, Sivakumar S, Majeed SA, Vimal S, Taju G, Hameed ASS. In vitro propagation of infectious myonecrosis virus in C6/36 mosquito cell line.. Journal of Fish Diseases. 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jfd.13359

[32] Saraswati E, Prajitno A, Yanuhar U, Abadi A. Administration of Hot Water Extract Diatomae Caetoceros Ceratosporum via Injection Enhances the Immune Resistance of White Shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei against Infectious Myonecrosis Virus. International Conference/Workshop on Automation of Software Test. 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5296/AST.V1I2.3889