Worms in Sheep: Common Gastrointestinal Nematodes and Their Management

Etiology and Major Nematode Species

Gastrointestinal nematodes (GINs) represent a major constraint to sheep production worldwide. The term "worms sheep get" encompasses a diverse assemblage of parasitic roundworms that inhabit the abomasum, small intestine, and large intestine of ovine hosts. The most pathogenic and economically significant species is the abomasal blood feeder Haemonchus contortus, which is prevalent in tropical, subtropical, and warm temperate regions [1, 2, 3]. Other abomasal nematodes include Teladorsagia circumcincta (formerly Ostertagia circumcincta), Ostertagia trifurcata, Marshallagia marshalli, and Parabronema skrjabini [4, 5]. Small intestinal nematodes of major importance comprise Trichostrongylus colubriformis, Trichostrongylus axei, Cooperia curticei, Cooperia punctata, Cooperia pectinata, Cooperia spatulata, Nematodirus spathiger, Bunostomum spp., and Strongyloides papillosus [1, 6, 4, 7]. Large intestinal species include Oesophagostomum columbianum, Trichuris ovis, and Chabertia ovina [1, 6, 7]. Cestodes of the genus Moniezia are also frequently detected in co-infection with nematodes [1, 6]. Lungworms such as Dictyocaulus filaria and protostrongylids (Muellerius capillaris, Protostrongylus rufescens) represent a separate respiratory nematode complex but are often considered in broader parasite management programs [8].

Epidemiology and Transmission Dynamics

The epidemiology of GIN infections is governed by complex interactions between host immunity, parasite biology, and environmental conditions. Prevalence studies across diverse geographic regions consistently demonstrate high infection rates. In a study conducted on the slopes of Mount Sumbing, Central Java, Indonesia, the highest prevalence of GINs was observed in male thin-tailed sheep (76.47%) during the rainy season, with H. contortus being the most prevalent species [1]. Altitude significantly influenced infection levels, with higher prevalence recorded at 1150 m above sea level compared to 1586 m [1]. In Kajiado North Sub-County, Kenya, an overall parasite prevalence of 91.3% was reported, with Strongylus type nematode eggs detected in 80% of samples and Eimeria oocysts in 60.8% [6]. Seasonal patterns are pronounced; wet season infections are consistently higher than dry season infections due to favorable conditions for egg hatching and larval development on pasture [1, 6, 7].

In temperate regions, transmission dynamics vary by species. H. contortus transmission is highly dependent on warm, moist conditions, whereas T. circumcincta and Trichostrongylus spp. can transmit under cooler conditions [9, 7, 10]. In Botucatu, Brazil, H. contortus and T. colubriformis exhibited 100% prevalence in tracer lambs over a three-year period, with H. contortus mean intensities ranging from 315 to 25,205 worms per animal [7]. A significant negative correlation was found between T. colubriformis worm counts and rainfall, suggesting that this species may be more resilient to drier conditions [7]. Co-grazing with cattle can increase nematode species diversity in sheep, including the detection of Haemonchus placei and interspecific hybrids between H. contortus and H. placei [4].

Life Cycle and Developmental Biology

All strongylid GINs share a direct life cycle. Adult female worms in the gastrointestinal tract produce eggs that are passed in feces. Under appropriate environmental conditions (optimal temperature range 18-26 degrees Celsius, adequate moisture), eggs hatch to release first-stage larvae (L1), which develop through second-stage (L2) to the infective third-stage (L3) [11, 12]. The L3 migrate onto herbage and are ingested by grazing sheep. Following ingestion, exsheathment occurs in the rumen or abomasum, and larvae penetrate the gastric or intestinal mucosa. After a period of histotrophic development (fourth-stage larvae, L4), they emerge as adult worms in the lumen. The prepatent period for H. contortus is approximately 18-21 days [13, 11]. Hypobiosis (arrested larval development) can occur in some species, particularly T. circumcincta and Ostertagia spp., allowing overwintering on pasture [9].

Clinical Signs and Pathophysiology

Clinical manifestations of GIN infection range from subclinical production losses to severe, life-threatening disease. The pathophysiology is species-dependent. H. contortus is a hematophagous parasite; each adult worm can consume approximately 0.05 mL of blood per day. Heavy infections cause acute or peracute anemia, pale mucous membranes, submandibular edema (bottle jaw), weakness, and sudden death [2, 3, 14]. Hematological alterations include microcytic hypochromic anemia, leukopenia, lymphopenia, neutropenia, and eosinophilia [3]. Biochemical changes comprise hypoproteinemia, hypoalbuminemia, hypoglobulinemia, reduced serum iron, zinc, and copper concentrations, and elevated total iron-binding capacity [3]. Oxidative stress markers show reduced superoxide dismutase activity and elevated malondialdehyde levels [3].

Trichostrongylus and Teladorsagia infections primarily cause protein-losing enteropathy, leading to weight loss, reduced wool growth, diarrhea, and ill-thrift [9, 33]. Diarrhea associated with GINs is a complex phenomenon involving direct mucosal damage and host inflammatory responses. Larval hypersensitivity scouring, characterized by a heightened inflammatory response to ingested L3 larvae, can cause diarrhea even in the absence of large adult worm burdens [9]. Oesophagostomum columbianum infection can cause nodular lesions in the large intestine, leading to chronic diarrhea and emaciation [7].

Diagnostic Approaches

Accurate diagnosis is fundamental to effective management. The cornerstone of antemortem diagnosis is the fecal egg count (FEC) using the modified McMaster technique, which provides quantitative estimation of eggs per gram of feces [1, 6]. The sensitivity of the McMaster method is approximately 50 eggs per gram. For detection of low-level infections, the FLOTAC or Mini-FLOTAC techniques offer improved sensitivity [15]. Larval culture and differentiation are essential for genus-level identification, as strongylid eggs are morphologically indistinguishable [6, 10]. The Baermann technique is used for detection of lungworm larvae [6].

Molecular diagnostic methods have advanced significantly. Droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR) targeting the internal transcribed spacer region 2 (ITS2) of ribosomal RNA allows absolute quantification and differentiation of Haemonchus, Teladorsagia, and Trichostrongylus genera in a single assay [15]. This method offers advantages over conventional qPCR in terms of precision and robustness, particularly for samples with mixed species infections [15]. Serological diagnosis using indirect ELISA with somatic antigens has been developed for detection of H. contortus infection, providing a complementary tool for herd-level surveillance [16].

Postmortem examination with worm counts from the abomasum and intestines remains the gold standard for quantifying worm burdens and assessing treatment efficacy [13, 4, 7]. The FAMACHA system, which uses conjunctival mucous membrane color to grade anemia, is a practical field tool for targeted selective treatment of haemonchosis [14]. Sheep are scored from 1 (red, non-anemic) to 5 (pale, severely anemic), allowing identification of individual animals requiring anthelmintic treatment [14].

Anthelmintic Treatment and Resistance

Anthelmintic drugs remain the primary intervention for GIN control. The major classes include benzimidazoles (e.g., albendazole, fenbendazole), macrocyclic lactones (e.g., ivermectin, moxidectin), and imidazothiazoles/tetrahydropyrimidines (e.g., levamisole, morantel) [17, 18, 19]. Combination products containing multiple active ingredients are increasingly used to delay resistance development [10].

Anthelmintic resistance (AR) is a global crisis in sheep production. Resistance has been documented in H. contortus, T. circumcincta, and Trichostrongylus spp. to all major drug classes [20, 18, 19, 21]. In Greece, the first identification of benzimidazole-resistant H. contortus was confirmed using the fecal egg count reduction test (FECRT) and molecular detection of beta-tubulin polymorphisms [21]. In the American continent, AR is widespread, with multiple drug class resistance common in many regions [19]. The economic costs of AR include increased treatment frequency, production losses, and mortality [34].

The FECRT is the standard method for detecting AR. A reduction in FEC of less than 95% with a lower 95% confidence interval below 90% indicates resistance [18, 21]. Molecular assays targeting single nucleotide polymorphisms in the beta-tubulin gene (for benzimidazole resistance) and the glutamate-gated chloride channel gene (for macrocyclic lactone resistance) are available for genotyping [21].

Phytotherapeutic alternatives have been investigated. Adansonia digitata and Anogeissus leiocarpa leaf powder demonstrated in vivo efficacy against H. contortus in sheep, with egg count reductions of 88.49% and 72.22%, respectively, and improvements in FAMACHA scores and packed cell volume [17]. Thymol and thymol acetate, plant-derived monoterpenes, showed in vitro and in vivo anthelmintic activity, with thymol acetate exhibiting lower toxicity (LD50 4,144.4 mg/kg) and 76.2% reduction in fecal egg count [22].

Integrated Control Strategies

Sustainable GIN management requires an integrated approach combining grazing management, genetic selection, biological control, and targeted anthelmintic use. Grazing strategies that reduce larval exposure include rotational grazing, mixed-species grazing with cattle, and prolonged pasture rest periods [10]. In a long-term case study on the Northern Tablelands of New South Wales, Australia, intensive rotational grazing (farmlet C) resulted in significantly lower mean FEC (444 epg) and reduced anthelmintic treatment frequency (3.1 treatments/year) compared to typical management (farmlet B: 1,122 epg, 4.3 treatments/year) [10]. Improved host nutrition alone (farmlet A) did not provide superior GIN control compared to typical management, despite supporting a 48% higher stocking rate [10].

Genetic selection for host resistance to GINs is a promising long-term strategy. Quantitative trait loci (QTL) affecting resistance to H. contortus have been identified on sheep chromosome 12, with resistant sheep showing lower FEC, reduced haematocrit drop, and decreased female worm fecundity [23, 24]. Genome-wide association studies using SNP markers have demonstrated that genomic prediction of breeding values for worm resistance is feasible, with correlations of up to 0.32 with estimated breeding values in industry sires [25]. Selection for reduced FEC has been shown to reduce worm numbers and worm fecundity following artificial infection with T. circumcincta and T. colubriformis [33].

Immunological mechanisms underlying resistance include Th2-type cytokine responses, eosinophil activity, and mucosal IgA production [26, 27, 28]. Depletion of gamma-delta T cells in parasite-resistant Canaria Hair Breed sheep increased susceptibility to H. contortus infection, indicating a protective role for this cell population [28]. Interleukin-5 modulation of eosinophil responses confirmed that eosinophils play a direct role in controlling adult H. contortus populations [26]. Mucosal IgA responses are associated with reduced adult worm length and fecundity [27].

Vaccine development against H. contortus has progressed significantly. Native antigen vaccines based on gut membrane proteins (H11, H-gal-GP) have shown efficacy in reducing FEC and worm burdens [2]. Recombinant and DNA-based vaccines are under investigation, with challenges including correct glycosylation of recombinant antigens and induction of long-lasting protective immunity [2]. The bacterial community associated with H. contortus, including vertically transmitted Weissella and Leuconostoc species, may offer novel targets for parasite control [29].

Quarantine protocols are essential to prevent introduction of resistant nematodes into naive flocks. A quarantine drench with a combination of effective anthelmintics (e.g., macrocyclic lactone plus benzimidazole plus levamisole) followed by a FECRT 10-14 days later is recommended for all introduced sheep [20].

Diagnostic and Management Decision Framework

The following Mermaid diagram illustrates a clinical decision framework for managing GIN infections in sheep flocks.

flowchart TD
    A[Flock presents with clinical signs: anemia, diarrhea, weight loss], > B[Collect fecal samples from representative animals]
    B, > C[Perform modified McMaster FEC]
    C, > D{FEC > 500 epg?}
    D, >|Yes| E[Perform FAMACHA scoring on all animals]
    D, >|No| F[Subclinical infection: monitor and re-test in 4 weeks]
    E, > G[FAMACHA score 1-2: no treatment]
    E, > H[FAMACHA score 3-5: targeted selective treatment]
    H, > I[Administer anthelmintic from effective class]
    I, > J[Collect post-treatment fecal samples at 10-14 days]
    J, > K[Perform FECRT]
    K, > L{FECR > 95%?}
    L, >|Yes| M[Anthelmintic effective: continue targeted use]
    L, >|No| N[Anthelmintic resistance suspected]
    N, > O[Perform larval culture and species identification]
    O, > P[Switch to alternative anthelmintic class or combination]
    P, > Q[Implement integrated control: grazing management, genetic selection, quarantine]
    Q, > R[Monitor FEC and FAMACHA at 4-6 week intervals]
    R, > A

Conclusion

Gastrointestinal nematodes remain a persistent threat to sheep health and productivity globally. The diversity of species, their complex epidemiology, and the widespread development of anthelmintic resistance necessitate a multifaceted management approach. Accurate diagnosis using quantitative FEC, larval differentiation, and molecular tools such as ddPCR is essential for informed decision-making. Integrated control strategies combining targeted selective treatment (e.g., FAMACHA), grazing management, genetic selection for resistance, and quarantine protocols offer the best prospect for sustainable parasite control. Continued research into vaccine development, phytotherapeutic alternatives, and host genetics will further enhance the tools available to veterinarians and producers.

References

[1] Baihaqi Z, Widiyono I, Nurcahyo W. Prevalence of gastrointestinal worms in Wonosobo and thin-tailed sheep on the slope of Mount Sumbing, Central Java, Indonesia. Veterinary World. 2019. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/60f4982d557eb8803a909a008faaca932900a658

[2] Adduci I, Sajovitz F, Hinney B, et al. Haemonchosis in Sheep and Goats, Control Strategies and Development of Vaccines against Haemonchus contortus. Animals. 2022. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/078c45ee8ce5facdec676e890284200a0d36cbfe

[3] Alam RT, Hassanen EA, El-Mandrawy SAM. Haemonchus Contortus infection in Sheep and Goats: alterations in haematological, biochemical, immunological, trace element and oxidative stress markers. Journal. 2020. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a1cf9e0bb774252fd8021f25071a529d641293e8

[4] Almeida FA, Bassetto CC, Amarante M, et al. Helminth infections and hybridization between Haemonchus contortus and Haemonchus placei in sheep from Santana do Livramento, Brazil. Revista Brasileira de Parasitologia Veterinaria. 2018. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ecb4746c3a540e0ca2301a296f4d0b10c530dd3a

[5] Yagoob G, Hossein H, Asso F. Prevalence of Abomasal Nematodes in Sheep Slaughtered at Baneh Town. Journal. 2013. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c0e373746a8e3164b68bf1f6eb91a10725681a43

[6] Mokhothu MJ, Ngugi RK, Mwenji BM, et al. Prevalence and Risk Factors of Gastrointestinal Parasites in Sheep in Kajiado North Sub-County, Kenya. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Applied Science. 2025. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8c3f1da729b7558bf2a4cd2dab013e81cb181a71

[7] Wilmsen MO, Silva BF, Bassetto CC, et al. Gastrointestinal nematode infections in sheep raised in Botucatu, state of São Paulo, Brazil. Revista Brasileira de Parasitologia Veterinaria. 2014. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/46ecdcab4c7fae7cee86104908f04215a08ebdbd

[8] Elahi A, Moghadam GA. A SURVEY ON ANNUAL INFESTATION OF SHEEP WITH LUNG WORMS BASED ON FECAL TEST AND SLAUGHTER HOUSE STUDY IN TABRIZ. Journal. 2009. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2656ee5426593d90c9655dbc355a442c1733c63b

[9] Jacobson C, Larsen JWA, Besier R, et al. Diarrhoea associated with gastrointestinal parasites in grazing sheep. Veterinary Parasitology. 2020. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/271dcdda484daf0f1cbe6ef9a74e3ac515fbb8ea

[10] Walkden-Brown S, Colvin A, Hall E, et al. Grazing systems and worm control in sheep: a long-term case study involving three management systems with analysis of factors influencing faecal worm egg count. Journal. 2013. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/cfe62a26c4b8ac15f5fa6e7dcaefcc240cf819bd

[11] Silver PH, Campbell JA. Studies on parasitic worms of sheep in Scotland. I. Embryonic and larval development of Haemonchus contortus at constant conditions. Journal. 1959. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4c35fd843664ef5f64ad47b77209f99c4982e919

[12] Silverman P, Campbell J. Studies on parasitic worms of sheep in Scotland. Parasitology. 1959. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b4091ccb8f361cc7b14770519717e675a1b1aee7

[13] Barger I, Le Jambre LL. Regulation of Haemonchus contortus populations in sheep: mortality of established worms. International Journal of Parasitology. 1988. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8d3488631d3998cdcce45bb07f931307866d806b

[14] van Wyk JV, Bath G. The FAMACHA system for managing haemonchosis in sheep and goats by clinically identifying individual animals for treatment. Veterinary Research. 2002. https://www.semanticscholar.org

[15] Elmahalawy ST, Halvarsson P, Skarin M, et al. Droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR) as a novel method for absolute quantification of major gastrointestinal nematodes in sheep. Veterinary Parasitology. 2018. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a09e97a546c8428a2b12e34dc44908e769e9e1a2

[16] Gowda A. Sero-prevalence of Haemonchus contortus infection in sheep by Indirect-ELISA using somatic antigen. Journal of Parasitic Diseases. 2016. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e6a020f35779f0df983d1befa398ae5d2cbd4932

[17] Kuiseu J, Konmy B, Dansou C, et al. In Vivo Anthelmintic Efficacy of Adansonia digitata and Anogeissus leiocarpa against Haemonchus contortus Infestation Induced in Sheep. Advances in Pharmacological and Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2024. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/052b40391adb12e75dd43ec9c254b2c1af217dca

[18] Aboelhadid S, Arafa W, El-Ashram S, et al. Haemonchus contortus Susceptibility and Resistance to Anthelmintics in Naturally Infected Egyptian Sheep. Acta Parasitologica. 2020. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/354fd40140a0b52dd82c82e0d4c1a84b8cdc6b56

[19] Torres-Acosta J, Mendoza-de-Gives P, Aguilar-Caballero A, et al. Anthelmintic resistance in sheep farms: update of the situation in the American continent. Veterinary Parasitology. 2012. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/12a87d4e5f0cd50fc7d8b8d2565b75b8178e8edf

[20] Swarnkar CP, Singh D. Role of quarantine in management of anthelmintic resistance in strongyle worms of sheep. Journal. 2012. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/643c07d1c1d0cb092cb060bdde0d876bbe98b66a

[21] Gallidis E, Angelopoulou K, Papadopoulos E. First identification of benzimidazole resistant Haemonchus contortus in sheep in Greece. Journal. 2012. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f620ac78d75d122cf2f984a197e701aa8b50a5ad

[22] André W, Cavalcante GS, Ribeiro W, et al. Anthelmintic effect of thymol and thymol acetate on sheep gastrointestinal nematodes and their toxicity in mice. Revista Brasileira de Parasitologia Veterinaria. 2017. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/82b8e2d0ebcd9371b53e46ed4fb2799d84d96b57

[23] Sallé G, Moreno CR, Boitard S, et al. Functional investigation of a QTL affecting resistance to Haemonchus contortus in sheep. Veterinary Research. 2014. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d16083d31f89b770f46bc6d8ba21d8623294e08f

[24] Sallé G, Jacquiet P, Gruner L, et al. A genome scan for QTL affecting resistance to Haemonchus contortus in sheep. Journal of Animal Science. 2012. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/704644a9d2f9e1c0d7eceec4b731f1e9c8096218

[25] Kemper K, Emery D, Bishop S, et al. The distribution of SNP marker effects for faecal worm egg count in sheep, and the feasibility of using these markers to predict genetic merit for resistance to worm infections. Genetics Research. 2011. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4e66b27050a380540f0733c729cb6d2fc8a04c6f

[26] Hernández JN, Meeusen E, Rodríguez F, et al. Increased susceptibility to Haemonchus contortus infection by interleukin-5 modulation of eosinophil responses in sheep. Parasite Immunology. 2019. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9b14fc07e0a0efb5194df29159bf74427c3ac789

[27] Hernández JN, Hernández Á, Stear MJ, et al. Potential role for mucosal IgA in modulating Haemonchus contortus adult worm infection in sheep. Veterinary Parasitology. 2016. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/adca5c92971ba20d7fc58398e48fa1cac9599b0b

[28] Hernández JN, Meeusen E, Stear M, et al. Modulation of Haemonchus contortus infection by depletion of gamma-delta+ T cells in parasite resistant Canaria Hair Breed sheep. Veterinary Parasitology. 2017. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9e1a5a93c14de56e0316fe4e655cfa59615845c3

[29] Sinnathamby G, Henderson G, Umair S, et al. The bacterial community associated with the sheep gastrointestinal nematode parasite Haemonchus contortus. PLoS ONE. 2018. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/18a52ef16909769795a535955537e89f3ad4ef59

[30] Seghetti L. Intestinal worms in sheep. Journal. 1949. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/cfee792f1e77a69d3802e01a972a8d0d6279e7b9

[31] Monnig H. Control of worms in sheep. Journal. 1942. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d2b1560fd407ea81d048caeaa9a3780895ea816e

[32] Attindéhou S, Salifou S, Biaou C, et al. Epidemiology of haemonchosis in sheep and goats in Benin. Journal. 2012. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2fcc90f12a1b93dd7453a4b0370ab01293e464c7