Suffolk Sheep Parasite Resistance: Anthelmintic Resistance and Management Strategies

Introduction

Gastrointestinal nematode (GIN) infections represent a major constraint to sheep production worldwide, causing reduced weight gain, impaired wool quality, anemia, and mortality [1, 2]. Among sheep breeds, the Suffolk is widely recognized as being particularly susceptible to GIN, especially to the barber pole worm Haemonchus contortus [3, 4]. This breed has been used extensively in comparative studies with resistant breeds such as Gulf Coast Native and Santa Ines sheep to dissect the genetic and immunological basis of parasite resistance [5, 6]. The intensive management of Suffolk flocks, often involving frequent anthelmintic treatments, has created strong selection pressure for drug-resistant nematode populations [7, 8]. Anthelmintic resistance (AR) now threatens the sustainability of sheep production globally, with multidrug resistance becoming commonplace [9, 10]. This article reviews the current understanding of AR in Suffolk sheep, covering breed-specific susceptibility, molecular resistance mechanisms, diagnostic approaches, and evidence-based management strategies.

Suffolk Sheep and Parasite Susceptibility

Suffolk sheep consistently demonstrate higher fecal egg counts (FEC) and lower resistance to H. contortus compared to breeds such as Gulf Coast Native, Santa Ines, and Florida Native [3, 4, 11]. In a series of experimental infections, Miller et al. [12] showed that Suffolk lambs had significantly higher FEC and lower packed cell volumes (PCV) than Gulf Coast Native lambs after challenge with H. contortus. Similar findings were reported by Amarante et al. [13], who compared Santa Ines, Suffolk, and Ile de France sheep under natural infection; Suffolks consistently harbored the highest worm burdens. The genetic basis for this susceptibility has been explored through segregation analyses in F2 progeny of Suffolk and Gulf Coast Native crosses, revealing quantitative trait loci (QTL) on chromosomes 3 and 20 that influence FEC and PCV [11]. More recently, copy number variant (CNV) analysis in Florida Native sheep identified immune-related genes such as CCL1, CCL2, NOS2, and TNF that are associated with parasite resistance [40], and these pathways may be less active in Suffolk sheep.

The periparturient rise in FEC is particularly pronounced in Suffolk ewes, which contributes to pasture contamination and infection of lambs [14]. This phenomenon is driven by temporary immunosuppression around lambing, leading to increased egg excretion [14]. Dever and Kahn [6] demonstrated that treating periparturient ewes with lipophilic anthelmintics (e.g., macrocyclic lactones) can reduce the postpartum egg rise but may also hasten the selection for resistance by exposing only the parasites in the ewe to drug while leaving a large refugia of susceptible larvae on pasture. The trade-off between maintaining production and slowing AR development is a central challenge in Suffolk flock management.

Mechanisms of Anthelmintic Resistance

Benzimidazole Resistance

Benzimidazole (BZ) resistance in H. contortus and other trichostrongylids is primarily mediated by single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the isotype-1 β-tubulin gene, particularly at codons 167 (Phe167Tyr), 198 (Glu198Ala), and 200 (Phe200Tyr) [7, 15, 16]. The F200Y substitution is the most prevalent worldwide [4, 7]. These mutations reduce binding affinity of BZ drugs to tubulin, thereby preventing disruption of microtubule polymerization [15]. Deep amplicon sequencing has become a powerful tool to quantify resistance allele frequencies in mixed-species infections [89], and pyrosequencing genotyping has been applied in field surveys [4]. In a large-scale screening of UK sheep farms, Melville et al. [4] detected BZ resistance mutations in Nematodirus battus, indicating early emergence of resistance in this species. H. contortus from Suffolk flocks in multiple countries show high frequencies of the resistance allele [7]. The use of allele-specific PCR (AS-PCR) has confirmed that BZ-resistant genotypes predominate post-treatment [16].

Macrocyclic Lactone Resistance

Resistance to macrocyclic lactones (MLs; ivermectin, moxidectin) is polygenic and involves multiple mechanisms, including increased expression of P-glycoprotein (PGP) efflux transporters, mutations in ligand-gated chloride channels (LGCC), and changes in the transcription factor cky-1 [15]. The genomic landscape of ML resistance was mapped by Doyle et al. [60] using a genetic cross between drug-susceptible and multidrug-resistant H. contortus strains, implicating cky-1 in ivermectin resistance. Transcriptome analyses have also highlighted the role of LGCC and PGP genes [15]. Moxidectin, a second-generation ML, often retains efficacy against ivermectin-resistant populations due to its higher lipophilicity and longer persistence [103]. However, resistance to moxidectin is now reported in many regions [17, 18]. In Suffolk flocks, the frequent use of long-acting ML formulations has accelerated resistance development, particularly when combined with drench-and-move strategies that reduce refugia [3, 6].

Levamisole and Monepantel Resistance

Levamisole resistance involves mutations in nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChR), including the unc-29, unc-38, and unc-63 subunits [15]. Monepantel, an amino-acetonitrile derivative (AAD), acts on a novel nAChR subtype (ACR-23/MPTL-1). Mutations in the MPTL-1 and ACR-23 genes confer resistance [15]. Rapid selection for monepantel resistance has been observed in the field following its introduction, particularly under suppressive treatment regimes [3, 17]. In Brazilian Suffolk flocks, monepantel efficacy was already below 95% in 18% of farms within a few years of market introduction [51].

A summary of the major resistance mechanisms is presented in Table 1.

Table 1. Molecular Mechanisms of Anthelmintic Resistance in Sheep Gastrointestinal Nematodes

Diagnostic Approaches for Anthelmintic Resistance

The faecal egg count reduction test (FECRT) remains the gold standard for diagnosing AR in the field [42]. The World Association for the Advancement of Veterinary Parasitology (WAAVP) recently published updated guidelines that recommend paired pre- and post-treatment individual FEC, a requirement for a minimum total egg count (rather than a mean EPG threshold), and species-specific interpretation thresholds [42]. The R package eggCounts provides Bayesian hierarchical models for estimating FECR and classifying resistance [65]. Pooling of samples can reduce costs, but individual sampling offers greater precision [37].

Molecular diagnostics complement FECRT by detecting resistance alleles at low frequencies. Deep amplicon sequencing can identify BZ resistance mutations in multiple species simultaneously with sensitivity down to 0.1% allele frequency [89,106]. The ITS-2 rDNA nemabiome metabarcoding approach provides species-level quantification of surviving nematodes post-treatment, enabling detection of resistance in individual species even when overall FECR is borderline [18]. This has been applied in Canadian and European sheep flocks to reveal that H. contortus is often the primary species surviving ML and BZ treatments [18].

In vitro tests such as the egg hatch test (EHT) for BZ resistance and the larval development test (LDT) for ML and LEV resistance offer alternative, laboratory-based detection methods [19]. These tests can be performed on pooled fecal samples and are useful for large-scale surveys, although correlation with in vivo FECRT results may vary [20].

On-farm tools like the FAMACHA system, which estimates anemia based on ocular mucous membrane color, aid in targeted selective treatment (TST) for H. contortus [5, 8]. In Suffolk sheep, the sensitivity and specificity of FAMACHA have been validated [8]. FAMACHA scores correlate with PCV and FEC, allowing identification of individual animals requiring treatment while leaving others untreated to maintain refugia [5, 8].

Management Strategies to Mitigate Anthelmintic Resistance

Integrated parasite management (IPM) for Suffolk flocks must combine strategic anthelmintic use, grazing management, genetic selection, and biosecurity to slow AR development.

Targeted Selective Treatment (TST)

TST involves treating only those animals that show signs of parasitism, leaving a proportion of the flock untreated to preserve drug-susceptible alleles in refugia [97,111]. In Suffolk sheep, TST based on FAMACHA scores or FEC thresholds has been shown to maintain production while reducing the number of treatments [58,66]. Williams et al. [1] demonstrated that periparturient ewe characteristics and nemabiome composition could guide TST decisions, improving sustainability. In a proof-of-concept study, George et al. [38] replaced a multidrug-resistant H. contortus population with a susceptible isolate via worm replacement, but resistance re-emerged within 1.5 years under TST with albendazole, highlighting the importance of maintaining adequate refugia.

Refugia-Based Strategies

Refugia refer to the portion of the parasite population not exposed to anthelmintic treatment (on pasture, in untreated animals) [97]. The concept is central to slowing resistance selection. Drench-and-move practices, where animals are treated and moved to clean pasture, drastically reduce refugia and accelerate resistance [77]. Conversely, leaving some animals untreated during strategic treatments (e.g., at weaning) helps maintain susceptible alleles [97,111]. Modeling studies confirm that refugia size is a key determinant of resistance evolution [21].

Grazing Management

Pasture rotation, mixed grazing with cattle (which share few nematode species with sheep), and avoiding overstocking reduce larval contamination and parasite exposure [22, 23]. The use of clean pasture for young lambs after anthelmintic treatment can reduce infection pressure, but if combined with treatment, it may select for resistance if refugia are insufficient [78]. Alternate grazing between sheep and cattle is recommended where practical [22].

Genetic Selection for Resistance

Breeding sheep for resistance to GIN is a sustainable long-term strategy. Heritability estimates for FEC in sheep range from 0.2 to 0.4 [24]. Genomic selection using SNP markers or CNV-based GWAS can identify animals with superior resistance [40,41]. The major histocompatibility complex (MHC) and immune-related genes (e.g., CTLA4, TLR) have been implicated [45,66]. Resistant breeds like Gulf Coast Native and Santa Ines exhibit stronger Th2-type immune responses with elevated eosinophils and parasite-specific IgA [9]. Crossbreeding Suffolk ewes with more resistant breeds can improve flock resilience [25], though care must be taken to preserve Suffolk carcass traits.

Biosecurity and Quarantine

Introducing sheep from other farms risks importing resistant nematodes. Quarantine treatment with a combination of anthelmintics from different classes (e.g., monepantel plus levamisole) followed by FECRT is recommended to ensure introduced animals are not carrying resistant worms [49,61,95]. Farmer education and adoption of SCOPS guidelines have been shown to improve practices [49,61,68,77].

A decision tree for implementing TST based on FAMACHA and FEC is presented in Figure 1.

graph TD
    A["Flock monitoring: FAMACHA score + FEC"] --> B{Individual FAMACHA score?}
    B -->|1 or 2| C["Do not treat; maintain refugia"]
    B -->|3| D["Check FEC; if >500 EPG treat, otherwise no treat"]
    B -->|4 or 5| E[Treat with anthelmintic based on FECRT history]
    C --> F[Repeat monitoring in 2-3 weeks]
    D --> F
    E --> F
    F --> A

Figure 1. Decision tree for targeted selective treatment (TST) using FAMACHA and fecal egg count (FEC) thresholds in Suffolk sheep. Adapted from methods validated in [5, 8].

Alternative and Complementary Approaches

Phytotherapy using tannin-rich plants (e.g., Punica granatum, Medicago saponins) has shown in vitro and in vivo anthelmintic activity, though efficacy is generally lower than synthetic drugs [54,73,108,114]. Copper oxide wire particles (COWP) can reduce H. contortus burden, but use must be monitored for copper toxicity. Nematophagous fungi (e.g., Duddingtonia flagrans) applied to pasture reduce larval survival [73]. These alternatives should be integrated with, not replace, evidence-based anthelmintic use.

Future Directions

The rapid evolution of AR necessitates continuous surveillance. The European COMBAR initiative has created a database of AR prevalence [70]. Machine learning models that incorporate farm management practices, climate data, and parasite genetics can predict resistance risk [2]. Advances in genomics, such as chromosome-level genomes for H. contortus [15], enable identification of novel resistance loci. The development of point-of-care molecular tests for resistance alleles would greatly enhance field diagnostics [81]. Finally, behavioral change among farmers, supported by veterinary advice, is critical for adoption of sustainable practices [49,77,109].

References

[1] Williams EG, Williams HW, Brophy PM, et al. Assessing periparturient ewe characteristics and nemabiome composition to guide targeted selective treatment for sustainable gastrointestinal nematodes control in sheep. Animal. 2024. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38718708/

[2] Niciura SCM, Sanches GM. Machine learning prediction of multiple anthelmintic resistance and gastrointestinal nematode control in sheep flocks. Rev Bras Parasitol Vet. 2024. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38511818/

[3] Campos KFD, Monteiro ALG, Pontarolo DV, et al. Suppressive treatment with monepantel and the fast selection for phenotypically resistant trichostrongylids of sheep. Parasitology. 2022. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35241201/

[4] Melville LA, Redman E, Morrison AA, et al. Large scale screening for benzimidazole resistance mutations in Nematodirus battus, using both pyrosequence genotyping and deep amplicon sequencing, indicates the early emergence of resistance on UK sheep farms. Int J Parasitol Drugs Drug Resist. 2020. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32251964/

[5] Pereira JF, Mendes JB, De Jong G, et al. FAMACHA(©) scores history of sheep characterized as resistant/resilient or susceptible to H. contortus in artificial infection challenge. Vet Parasitol. 2016. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26872936/

[6] Dever ML, Kahn LP. Decline in faecal worm egg counts in lambs suckling ewes treated with lipophilic anthelmintics: implications for hastening development of anthelmintic resistance. Vet Parasitol. 2015. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25754351/

[7] Niciura SC, Veríssimo CJ, Gromboni JG, et al. F200Y polymorphism in the β-tubulin gene in field isolates of Haemonchus contortus and risk factors of sheep flock management practices related to anthelmintic resistance. Vet Parasitol. 2012. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22858226/

[8] Sotomaior CS, Rosalinski-Moraes F, da Costa AR, et al. Sensitivity and specificity of the FAMACHA(©) system in Suffolk sheep and crossbred Boer goats. Vet Parasitol. 2012. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22770704/

[9] Shakya KP, Miller JE, Horohov DW. A Th2 type of immune response is associated with increased resistance to Haemonchus contortus in naturally infected Gulf Coast Native lambs. Vet Parasitol. 2009. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19406579/

[10] Chagas AC, Oliveira MC, Esteves SN, et al. [Gastrointestinal nematode parasitism in ewes and lambs raised in São Carlos, São Paulo]. Rev Bras Parasitol Vet. 2008. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20059831/

[11] Miller JE, Bishop SC, Cockett NE, et al. Segregation of natural and experimental gastrointestinal nematode infection in F2 progeny of susceptible Suffolk and resistant Gulf Coast Native sheep and its usefulness in assessment of genetic variation. Vet Parasitol. 2006. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16621290/

[12] Miller JE, Bahirathan M, Lemarie SL, et al. Epidemiology of gastrointestinal nematode parasitism in Suffolk and Gulf Coast Native sheep with special emphasis on relative susceptibility to Haemonchus contortus infection. Vet Parasitol. 1998. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9493310/

[13] Amarante AF, Bricarello PA, Rocha RA, et al. Resistance of Santa Ines, Suffolk and Ile de France sheep to naturally acquired gastrointestinal nematode infections. Vet Parasitol. 2004. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15019147/

[14] Courtney CH, Gessner R, Sholz SR, et al. The periparturient rise in fecal egg counts in three strains of Florida Native ewes and its value in predicting resistance of lambs to Haemonchus contortus. Int J Parasitol. 1986. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ba1ae4f5123753b8afb1f1a3a36594344a8bdc17

[15] Rodrigues JFV, Monteiro JP, Almeida T, et al. A systematic review of the molecular mechanisms related to anthelmintic resistance in Haemonchus contortus: A contemporary narrative. Vet Parasitol. 2025. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6e2106e3888a0f2efff2c26ff0dd5aa3362e757c

[16] Bihaqi SJ, Allaie I, Banday M, et al. Multiple anthelmintic resistance in gastrointestinal nematodes of Caprines on Mountain Research Centre for Sheep and Goat at Kashmir Valley, India. Parasite Epidemiol Control. 2020. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/27d1da7ce448dc745792d9d718f274407133fa26

[17] Bassetto CC, Albuquerque ACA, Lins J, et al. Revisiting anthelmintic resistance in sheep flocks from São Paulo State, Brazil. Int J Parasitol Drugs Drug Resist. 2024. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d55c7e8be3b8c46123665819c19ff35f7717675b

[18] Krücken J, Ehnert P, Fiedler S, et al. Faecal egg count reduction tests and nemabiome analysis reveal high frequency of multi-resistant parasites on sheep farms in north-east Germany involving multiple strongyle parasite species. Int J Parasitol Drugs Drug Resist. 2024. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/89b4eb22fc609f6c1f405b91e47eb69b809b0f42

[19] Mphahlele M, Tsotetsi-Khambule A, Moerane R, et al. Anthelmintic resistance and prevalence of gastrointestinal nematodes infecting sheep in Limpopo Province, South Africa. Vet World. 2021. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9a017c188611e50f3cc9995635798658a1001bef

[20] Crook E, O'Brien DJ, Howell S, et al. Prevalence of anthelmintic resistance on sheep and goat farms in the mid-Atlantic region and comparison of in vivo and in vitro detection methods. 2016. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e8a9836d59e769adb75a08fd6805b78e837191f7

[21] Laurenson Y, Kyriazakis I, Bishop S. In silico exploration of the impact of pasture larvae contamination and anthelmintic treatment on genetic parameter estimates for parasite resistance in grazing sheep. J Anim Sci. 2012. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/24fd7c81da6279f13da106480a15919d947a9d5e

[22] Wray E. Investigations Into the Cross-Infectivity of Nematode Parasites of Cattle and Sheep. 2015. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/02f75bcb7c10773cf64783f06aef9f2f72a68494

[23] Charlier J, Hoste H, Sotiraki S. COMBAR – Combatting anthelmintic resistance in ruminants. Parasite. 2023. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/cbe342ef599540067ace5ba136fb7b813ae2fa8a

[24] Brown DJ, Fogarty N. Genetic relationships between internal parasite resistance and production traits in Merino sheep. 2016. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1306c96ef599ed5ea216dcdd206ef23827f1f3a6

[25] Li Y, Miller JE, Franke DE. Epidemiological observations and heterosis analysis of gastrointestinal nematode parasitism in Suffolk, Gulf Coast Native, and crossbred lambs. Vet Parasitol. 2001. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11423185/

[26] Israf DA, Jackson F, Stevenson LM, et al. Persistence of immunity of Nematodirus battus infection in lambs. Vet Parasitol. 1997. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9231987/

[27] Bahirathan M, Miller JE, Barras SR, et al. Susceptibility of Suffolk and Gulf Coast Native suckling lambs to naturally acquired strongylate nematode infection. Vet Parasitol. 1996. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8983151/

[28] Miller JE, Barras SR. Ivermectin resistant Haemonchus contortus in Louisiana lambs. Vet Parasitol. 1994. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7725627/

[29] Vieira LS, Berne ME, Cavalcante AC, et al. Haemonchus contortus resistance to ivermectin and netobimin in Brazilian sheep. Vet Parasitol. 1992. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1485411/

[30] Pankavich JA, Berger H, Simkins KL. Efficacy of moxidectin, nemadectin and ivermectin against an ivermectin-resistant strain of Haemonchus contortus in sheep. Vet Rec. 1992. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1514227/

[31] Muchiut S, Fernández AS, Steffan P, et al. Anthelmintic resistance: Management of parasite refugia for Haemonchus contortus through the replacement of resistant with susceptible populations. Vet Parasitol. 2018. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e45dda313a71c89d9681a230219e251d83e75ab9

[32] Hou B, Yong R-S, Wuen J, et al. Positivity Rate Investigation and Anthelmintic Resistance Analysis of Gastrointestinal Nematodes in Sheep and Cattle in Ordos, China. Animals. 2022. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7e954c7b6e70faee41f58236843b341f584d0298

[33] Höglund J, Baltrušis P, Enweji N, et al. Signs of multiple anthelmintic resistance in sheep gastrointestinal nematodes in Sweden. Vet Parasitol Reg Stud Reports. 2022. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/26e2480378eecd8d49d8e369caf5b74c984a8634

[34] Traversa D, von Samson-Himmelstjerna G. Anthelmintic resistance in sheep gastro-intestinal strongyles in Europe. 2016. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d74fcf4cf8bdafd7173b475b3407a98cc5f2adc2

[35] Learmount J, Stephens N, Boughtflower V, et al. The development of anthelmintic resistance with best practice control of nematodes on commercial sheep farms in the UK. Vet Parasitol. 2016. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/cd020bbd0db54a5b0c76ae1bdce9337dc9c081b5

[36] Claerebout E, De Wilde N, Van Mael E, et al. Anthelmintic resistance and common worm control practices in sheep farms in Flanders, Belgium. Vet Parasitol Reg Stud Reports. 2020. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c1d9f92eda35f1ef4738c34f *** Disclaimer: This article is for educational and informational purposes only. It is not intended to substitute for professional veterinary advice, diagnosis, treatment, or regulatory guidance. Always consult a licensed veterinarian or qualified specialist regarding animal health, disease diagnosis, and treatment decisions.