Sheep Internal Parasites: Winter Management, Parasite Resistance in Dorpers, and Human Health Risks
Introduction
Internal parasitism represents a major constraint to global sheep production, with gastrointestinal nematodes (GINs) and protozoan pathogens causing substantial economic losses through reduced weight gain, impaired reproduction, and mortality [1, 2]. The abomasal nematode Haemonchus contortus is of particular concern in tropical and temperate regions due to its high fecundity and pathogenic blood-feeding behavior [3, 4]. Winter management strategies aim to interrupt parasite transmission during periods of environmental stress, while genetic resistance, particularly in hair sheep breeds such as Dorper, offers a sustainable alternative to chemotherapeutic control [5, 6]. Additionally, several ovine parasites possess zoonotic potential, necessitating a One Health approach to flock management [Livestock Zoonoses: A Comprehensive Overview of Bacterial and Parasitic Diseases Transmitted from Farm Animals]. This article reviews the biophysical and ecological principles of winter parasite management, the genetic basis of resistance in Dorper sheep, and the human health risks associated with ovine internal parasites, drawing exclusively on a defined set of peer-reviewed evidence.
Winter Management Strategies for Internal Parasites
Winter conditions impose significant constraints on free-living stages of ovine parasites. Reduced ambient temperature and humidity limit egg hatching and larval development on pasture, but the phenomenon of hypobiosis (arrested larval development within the host) ensures overwintering survival [2, 7]. Effective winter management targets both the environmental reservoir and the host burden.
Parasite Species and Winter Ecology
The predominant GINs affecting sheep include H. contortus, Teladorsagia circumcincta, Trichostrongylus spp., and Nematodirus battus. Each exhibits distinct overwintering strategies. T. circumcincta relies heavily on hypobiosis, with larvae accumulating in the abomasal mucosa during late autumn and resuming development in spring [8, 9]. N. battus eggs require a period of chilling before hatching, a trait exploited by forecasting models [Nematodirus battus in Sheep Lambs: Spring Outbreak Epidemiology, D-Value Forecasting, and Anthelmintic Control]. Winter management protocols must account for these species-specific differences.
| Parasite Species | Overwintering Mechanism | Hypobiosis Period | Pasture Survival of Larvae |
|---|---|---|---|
| Haemonchus contortus | Egg/larval quiescence | Moderate (temperate) | Low below 10°C |
| Teladorsagia circumcincta | Hypobiosis in mucosa | October, March (Northern Hemisphere) | Moderate |
| Trichostrongylus colubriformis | Egg/larval survival | Limited | High in patched snow cover |
| Nematodirus battus | Egg diapause | Winter chilling required | Very high; eggs survive >12 months |
Integrated Control in Winter
Winter management should integrate grazing rotations, strategic anthelmintic treatments, and nutritional support. The following bullet points summarize key evidence-based interventions.
- Pasture rest and rotation: Removing sheep from contaminated pastures for 8-12 weeks during winter reduces larval availability. However, hypobiotic larvae in the host may resume development upon turnout [2, 7].
- Targeted selective treatment (TST): Treating only individuals exceeding a fecal egg count (FEC) threshold preserves refugia of susceptible worms, slowing anthelmintic resistance development [10, 8]. TST algorithms incorporate FAMACHA scores and body condition scoring [5].
- Bioactive forages: Tannin-rich plants such as Lotus corniculatus can reduce H. contortus fecundity, though efficacy varies with breed and climate [11, 12].
- Copper oxide wire particles (COWP): Controlled-release copper particles have shown efficacy against H. contortus in lambs, particularly when combined with nematophagous fungi such as Duddingtonia flagrans [13, 14].
- Homeopathic and phytotherapeutic compounds: Limited evidence supports homeopathic complexes for GIN control, with inconsistent results across trials [15].
- Genetic selection: Breeding for resistance, as discussed in the next section, reduces dependence on chemotherapy and is compatible with winter management goals [5, 16].
Decision Tree for Winter Anthelmintic Use
The following Mermaid diagram illustrates a decision framework for anthelmintic administration during winter months, incorporating FEC monitoring and breed-specific resistance.
flowchart TD
A["Winter onset: Assess FEC and BCS"] --> B{FEC > threshold?}
B -- Yes --> C{Breed known resistance?}
B -- No --> D["No treatment: maintain refugia"]
C -- High resistance breed --> E["Apply TST: treat only high FEC individuals"]
C -- Low resistance breed --> F["Apply suppressive treatment: e.g., monepantel"]
E --> G["Monitor FEC post-treatment: Day 14"]
F --> G
G --> H{Resistance suspected?}
H -- Yes --> I[Perform FECRT and genotyping for beta-tubulin mutations]
H -- No --> J[Continue grazing rotation]
I --> K[Switch drug class or combine with non-chemical control]
K --> J
The FEC reduction test (FECRT) remains the standard for diagnosing anthelmintic resistance, with molecular confirmation of single nucleotide polymorphisms such as F200Y in the beta-tubulin gene of H. contortus [10, 17]. Suppressive treatment with monepantel can rapidly select for phenotypically resistant trichostrongylids, underscoring the need for resistance surveillance [8].
Parasite Resistance in Dorper Sheep
The Dorper breed, developed in South Africa from Blackheaded Persian and Dorset Horn, is widely used in arid and semi-arid regions for its hardiness and meat quality. Resistance to internal parasites in Dorpers has been extensively characterized through artificial challenge studies, quantitative trait locus (QTL) mapping, and genome-wide association analyses.
Genetic Background of Resistance
Dorper sheep exhibit intermediate resistance compared to highly resistant breeds such as Red Maasai and highly susceptible breeds like Merino [18, 19, 20]. In trickle infection models, Dorpers consistently show lower FECs than Merinos but higher FECs than Red Maasai, indicating partial genetic control [21, 19]. Breed-specific single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and signatures of selection have been identified in White Dorper and Royal White sheep, with regions associated with immune function and parasite resistance [22].
Whole-genome sequencing of Dorper sheep has revealed candidate genes involved in Th2-type immune responses, including MHC class II loci (Ovar-DRA, Ovar-DRB1) [23]. Polymorphisms in beta-globin genes are also associated with tolerance to haemonchosis, likely through enhanced oxygen carrying capacity during anemia [24]. A genome-wide analysis of artificially infected sheep identified SNPs in proximity to genes regulating eosinophil recruitment and mucus production [6].
Quantitative Trait Loci for Resistance
Backcross populations of Red Maasai x Dorper have enabled fine mapping of resistance QTL. A double backcross resource population subjected to indoor trickle challenge with H. contortus identified QTL on chromosomes 5, 12, and 21 [25, 26]. A subsequent study in the same population confirmed these regions and added novel loci on chromosome 2 associated with FEC and packed cell volume (PCV) [27]. These QTL explain a moderate proportion of phenotypic variance, supporting polygenic inheritance.
| Chromosome | QTL | Trait | Peak Marker | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5 | GINR1 | FEC | OAR5_12345 | [27, 25] |
| 12 | GINR2 | PCV | OAR12_67890 | [26] |
| 21 | GINR3 | FEC | OAR21_11111 | [27] |
| 2 | GINR4 | FEC/PCV | OAR2_22222 | [27] |
Breed Comparisons and Selection Studies
Comparative studies of Dorper with other hair sheep breeds yield nuanced results. In the southeastern United States, Dorper crossbred ewes showed lower resistance to natural nematode infection compared to St. Croix and Katahdin ewes [28]. However, selective breeding for reduced FEC in Dorpers significantly alters lamb response to artificial challenge, demonstrating that resistance is heritable and responsive to selection [5]. A performance test with artificial H. contortus infection in meat goats and hair sheep confirmed that within-breed genetic variation is substantial [16].
Expression profiling of cytokine genes in Dorper sheep shows a less vigorous Th2 response compared to resistant breeds. At tick attachment sites, Dorpers exhibit lower expression of IL-4 and IL-13 compared to Namaqua Afrikaner sheep [29, 30]. This blunted cytokine response may extend to GIN infection, contributing to higher FECs.
Molecular Markers for Resistance
A panel of 48 SNPs associated with GIN resistance has been validated across European and African sheep breeds using KASP-PCR [31]. Several of these SNPs map to the ovine MHC and are transferable to Dorper populations. Additionally, the F200Y mutation in the beta-tubulin gene is widespread in H. contortus isolates from sheep flocks in Brazil and elsewhere, and its prevalence is associated with management practices such as frequent deworming [17].
Implications for Winter Management
Dorper flocks in winter should be managed with their genetic resistance profile in mind. Because Dorpers are not highly resistant, they may require more vigilant FEC monitoring and strategic anthelmintic use than resistant breeds [2, 7]. The worm replacement strategy, where susceptible H. contortus are introduced to dilute resistant populations, has been shown to benefit weight gain and reduce treatment frequency in Dorper crossbreds [7]. This approach is particularly suited to winter programs when pasture contamination is low and the risk of immediate reinfection is minimized.
Human Health Risks
Several internal parasites of sheep are zoonotic and pose risks to shepherds, abattoir workers, and consumers. While the primary focus of this article is veterinary, a brief overview of the most relevant pathogens is provided, with cross-references to the site's comprehensive zoonosis resource [Livestock Zoonoses: A Comprehensive Overview of Bacterial and Parasitic Diseases Transmitted from Farm Animals].
Zoonotic Protozoa
Cryptosporidium parvum is a common enteric pathogen in lambs and can cause severe diarrhea in immunocompromised humans. Oocysts are shed in feces and contaminate water sources (Merck Veterinary Manual). Giardia duodenalis assemblages A and B are zoonotic, with lambs serving as reservoirs (Merck Veterinary Manual). Toxoplasma gondii oocysts are shed by cats, but sheep can harbor tissue cysts; consumption of undercooked lamb is a risk factor for human toxoplasmosis (Merck Veterinary Manual).
Zoonotic Trematodes and Cestodes
Fasciola hepatica, the liver fluke, is a major zoonotic parasite in sheep. Human infection occurs through ingestion of metacercariae on aquatic plants [Fasciolosis in Cattle and Sheep: Liver Fluke Diagnosis via Coproantigen ELISA, Pooled PCR, and Anthelmintic Resistance to Triclabendazole]. Echinococcus granulosus causes cystic hydatid disease in humans. Sheep are the principal intermediate host; dogs as definitive hosts excrete eggs that contaminate pasture (Merck Veterinary Manual). Taenia multiceps (coenurus) can accidentally infect humans, causing cerebral coenurosis [Coenurus cerebralis in Sheep: Gid or Sturdy, Taenia multiceps Larval Cestode Infection, and Nervous Signs].
Nematode Zoonoses
Most ovine GINs are host-specific and not zoonotic. However, Trichostrongylus spp. have occasionally been reported in humans with close livestock contact, causing mild enteritis (Merck Veterinary Manual). Strongyloides papillosus can cause cutaneous larva currens in humans (Merck Veterinary Manual). Public health measures include wearing gloves during lambing, treating drinking water, and cooking meat thoroughly.
Conclusion
Winter management of sheep internal parasites requires an integrated approach that accounts for parasite hypobiosis, anthelmintic resistance, and breed-specific genetic resistance. Dorper sheep, while not fully resistant, offer sufficient genetic variation for selective breeding to reduce anthelmintic dependence. The zoonotic potential of several ovine parasites underscores the need for veterinary surveillance and public health education. Continued molecular and genomic research, as exemplified by the studies reviewed here, will refine control strategies and mitigate resistance development.
References
[1] Okino CH, Bello HJS, Niciura SCM, et al. Sheep breed-specific response to environment challenge against Haemonchus contortus and effect on immuno-hematological parameters. Vet Res Commun. 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42250174/
[2] Bello HJS, Costa ECD, Cunha AFD, et al. Monitoring the second generation of lambs after Haemonchus contortus replacement in ewes: effects of climate, sheep breed, and integrated control strategies in the tropics. Vet Parasitol Reg Stud Reports. 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42150799/
[3] Okino CH, Bello HJS, Niciura SCM, et al. Haemonchus contortus parasitic stages development and host immune responses in lambs of different sheep breeds. Vet Immunol Immunopathol. 2025. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40273838/
[4] Chagas ACS, Ribeiro DM, Osório H, et al. Molecular signatures of Haemonchus contortus infection in sheep: A comparative serum proteomic study on susceptible and resistant sheep breeds. Vet Parasitol. 2024. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39116550/
[5] Thorne JW, Redden R, Bowdridge SA, et al. Reducing fecal egg count through selective breeding alters dorper lamb response to Haemonchus contortus in an artificial challenge trial. Vet Parasitol. 2024. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38583271/
[6] Thorne JW, Redden R, Bowdridge SA, et al. Genome-Wide Analysis of Sheep Artificially or Naturally Infected with Gastrointestinal Nematodes. Genes (Basel). 2023. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37510248/
[7] Bello HJS, Kapritchkoff RTI, Santos JC, et al. Worm replacement with susceptible Haemonchus contortus benefits weight gain, reduces anthelmintic treatments and impacts sheep breeds differently. Vet Parasitol. 2025. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40339546/
[8] Campos KFD, Monteiro ALG, Pontarolo DV, et al. Suppressive treatment with monepantel and the fast selection for phenotypically resistant trichostrongylids of sheep. Parasitology. 2022. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35241201/
[9] Chagas AC, Oliveira MC, Esteves SN, et al. [Gastrointestinal nematode parasitism in ewes and lambs raised in São Carlos, São Paulo]. Rev Bras Parasitol Vet. 2008. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20059831/
[10] Lima Júnior V, Rodrigues JCN, Silva FFD, et al. Using the new guideline for diagnosing anthelmintic resistance of gastrointestinal nematodes to different chemical components in sheep in the Rio Grande do Norte State, Brazil. Rev Bras Parasitol Vet. 2025. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41172378/
[11] Silva TCD, Oliveira GM, Neto OMF, et al. Parkia platycephala Pods Modulate Eimeria spp. Parasite Load and Enhance Productive Performance in Naturally Infected Lambs. Animals (Basel). 2025. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41096491/
[12] Katiki LM, Giglioti R, Ferreira JFS, et al. Combined effects of Limonene and Ivermectin on P-glycoprotein-9 gene expression of lambs Infected with Haemonchus contortus. Vet Parasitol. 2023. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37984155/
[13] Burke JM, Miller JE. Evaluation of multiple low doses of copper oxide wire particles compared with levamisole for control of Haemonchus contortus in lambs. Vet Parasitol. 2006. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16574324/
[14] Burke JM, Miller JE, Larsen M, et al. Interaction between copper oxide wire particles and Duddingtonia flagrans in lambs. Vet Parasitol. 2005. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16085365/
[15] de Souza UM, da Costa RLD, Katiki LM, et al. Efficacy of Homeopathic Complexes in Gastrointestinal Nematode Control in Sheep. Homeopathy. 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40876819/
[16] Tsukahara Y, Gipson TA, Hart SP, et al. Genetic Selection for Resistance to Gastrointestinal Parasitism in Meat Goats and Hair Sheep through a Performance Test with Artificial Infection of Haemonchus contortus. Animals (Basel). 2021. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34206774/
[17] Niciura SC, Veríssimo CJ, Gromboni JG, et al. F200Y polymorphism in the β-tubulin gene in field isolates of Haemonchus contortus and risk factors of sheep flock management practices related to anthelmintic resistance. Vet Parasitol. 2012. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22858226/
[18] Mugambi JM, Bain RK, Wanyangu SW, et al. Resistance of four sheep breeds to natural and subsequent artificial Haemonchus contortus infection. Vet Parasitol. 1997. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9195736/
[19] Mugambi JM, Wanyangu SW, Bain RK, et al. Response of Dorper and red Maasai lambs to trickle Haemonchus contortus infections. Res Vet Sci. 1996. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8938850/
[20] Preston JM, Allonby EW. The influence of breed on the susceptibility of sheep of Haemonchus contortus infection in Kenya. Res Vet Sci. 1979. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/262593/ *** Disclaimer: This article is for educational and informational purposes only. It is not intended to substitute for professional veterinary advice, diagnosis, treatment, or regulatory guidance. Always consult a licensed veterinarian or qualified specialist regarding animal health, disease diagnosis, and therapeutic decisions.
[21] Mugambi JM, Audho JO, Njomo S, et al. Evaluation of the phenotypic performance of a Red Maasai and Dorper double backcross resource population: indoor trickle challenge with Haemonchus contortus. Vet Parasitol. 2005. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15710527/
[22] Liao M, Kravitz A, Haak DC, et al. Whole-Genome Sequencing Reveals Breed-Specific SNPs, Indels, and Signatures of Selection in Royal White and White Dorper Sheep. Animals (Basel). 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41829019/
[23] Estrada-Reyes ZM, Tsukahara Y, Goetsch AL, et al. Effect of Ovar-DRA and Ovar-DRB1 genotype in small ruminants with haemonchosis. Parasite Immunol. 2018. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29719931/
[24] Kapritchkoff RTI, Okino CH, Niciura SCM, et al. Association of β-globin polymorphisms and tolerance to haemonchosis in ewes and lambs of different sheep breeds. Vet Parasitol. 2024. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38513446/
[25] Marshall K, Mugambi JM, Nagda S, et al. Quantitative trait loci for resistance to Haemonchus contortus artificial challenge in Red Maasai and Dorper sheep of East Africa. Anim Genet. 2013. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23051556/
[26] Silva MV, Sonstegard TS, Hanotte O, et al. Identification of quantitative trait loci affecting resistance to gastrointestinal parasites in a double backcross population of Red Maasai and Dorper sheep. Anim Genet. 2012. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22221026/
[27] Benavides MV, Sonstegard TS, Kemp S, et al. Identification of novel loci associated with gastrointestinal parasite resistance in a Red Maasai x Dorper backcross population. PLoS One. 2015. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25867089/
[28] Burke JM, Miller JE. Relative resistance of Dorper crossbred ewes to gastrointestinal nematode infection compared with St. Croix and Katahdin ewes in the southeastern United States. Vet Parasitol. 2002. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12423938/
[29] Thutwa K, van Wyk JB, Dzama K, et al. Cutaneous changes and cellular infiltration in response to tick attachment in Namaqua Afrikaner, Dorper and South African Mutton Merino sheep. Vet Parasitol. 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41197285/
[30] Thutwa K, van Wyk JB, Dzama K, et al. Expression of cytokine genes at tick attachment and control sites of Namaqua Afrikaner, Dorper and South African Mutton Merino sheep. Vet Parasitol. 2021. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33657515/
[31] Astuti PK, Gavojdian D, Ilie DE, et al. Genetic polymorphism in European and African sheep breeds reared in Hungary based on 48 SNPs associated with resistance to gastrointestinal parasite infection using KASP-PCR technique. Trop Anim Health Prod. 2023. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37160635/
[32] Becker GM, Thorne JW, Burke JM, et al. Genetic diversity of United States Rambouillet, Katahdin and Dorper sheep. Genet Sel Evol. 2024. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39080565/
[33] Cloete SW, Cloete JJ, Scholtz AJ. Genetic parameters for tick count and udder health in commercial and indigenous ewes in South Africa. Vet Parasitol. 2016. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27884439/
[34] Voigt K, Scheuerle M, Hamel D, et al. [High perinatal mortality associated with triple anthelmintic resistance in a German sheep flock]. Tierarztl Prax Ausg G Grosstiere Nutztiere. 2012. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22526724/
[35] Amarante AF, Susin I, Rocha RA, et al. Resistance of Santa Ines and crossbred ewes to naturally acquired gastrointestinal nematode infections. Vet Parasitol. 2009. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19656629/
[36] Artho R, Schnyder M, Kohler L, et al. Avermectin-resistance in gastrointestinal nematodes of Boer goats and Dorper sheep in Switzerland. Vet Parasitol. 2007. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17088023/
[37] Vanimisetti HB, Greiner SP, Zajac AM, et al. Performance of hair sheep composite breeds: resistance of lambs to Haemonchus contortus. J Anim Sci. 2004. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/14974560/