Internal Parasites of Sheep: A Clinical Overview of Gastrointestinal Nematodes

Etiology and Taxonomic Classification

Gastrointestinal nematodes (GINs) infecting sheep constitute a taxonomically diverse assemblage within the order Strongylida and the family Trichostrongylidae, with additional representatives from the orders Ascaridida and Enoplida. The most clinically significant genera include Haemonchus, Teladorsagia, Trichostrongylus, Nematodirus, Cooperia, and Oesophagostomum [1, 2, 3]. Among these, Haemonchus contortus is the most pathogenic blood-feeding abomasal nematode of small ruminants globally, exhibiting a high degree of genetic diversity that complicates control efforts [4, 2, 5, 6]. Teladorsagia circumcincta is a principal abomasal parasite in temperate regions, while Trichostrongylus species (T. colubriformis, T. vitrinus, T. axei) colonize the small intestine and abomasum [3, 7]. Nematodirus battus is a monoxenous parasite causing outbreaks in spring lambs due to its unique egg-hatching ecology. The complex of species that collectively constitute the parasitic community responsible for parasitic gastroenteritis (PGE) is often referred to in the aggregated context of the worms sheep get during grazing [1, 8, 9].

For a broader phylogenetic and anatomical overview of these organisms, readers are directed to the dedicated article on Nematodes of Sheep: Gastrointestinal and Respiratory Parasites. The clinical spectrum of these infections is also detailed in Gastrointestinal Nematodes in Sheep: Epidemiology, Clinical Signs, and Control.

Epidemiology and Transmission Dynamics

The epidemiology of GINs is governed by complex interactions between host immunity, pasture contamination, climatic variables, and management practices [1]. The periparturient relaxation of immunity in ewes leads to a seasonal rise in fecal egg output, contaminating pastures for susceptible lambs [8]. Larval survival on pasture is highly dependent on temperature and humidity; optimal conditions for development and translation of third-stage larvae (L3) from feces onto herbage occur between 10 degrees Celsius and 30 degrees Celsius with adequate moisture [10, 9]. In arid and semi-arid environments, H. contortus can survive as hypobiotic larvae within the host during dry seasons, resuming development when conditions improve [11, 12].

Geospatial modeling has demonstrated that environmental factors such as normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) and land surface temperature are strong predictors of parasitic infection risk, including that of Fasciola hepatica and by parallel inference GINs, in highland grazing systems [10]. Co-occurrence patterns of nematodes and protozoan parasites in wild and domestic sheep are significantly influenced by host geography and environmental gradients [1]. Paleoparasitological studies from Patagonia have confirmed the long-term association of trichostrongylid eggs with ovine husbandry, underscoring the historical and stable nature of this host-parasite relationship [9].

Pathogenesis and Clinical Pathology

Pathogenesis varies by nematode genus, larval burden, and host immune status. H. contortus is a voracious blood feeder; adult worms penetrate the abomasal mucosa using a lancet-like buccal tooth, disrupting capillaries and causing direct blood loss at a rate of approximately 0.05 mL per worm per day [2, 13, 14]. This results in acute or chronic hemorrhagic anemia, hypoproteinemia, and submandibular edema (bottle jaw) [11, 12]. The pathognomonic presentation is pale mucous membranes, which provides the basis for the FAMACHA scoring system used clinically to detect anemia in affected sheep [4, 6].

Teladorsagia circumcincta and Trichostrongylus species induce a catarrhal abomasitis or enteritis, respectively, characterized by infiltration of eosinophils and mast cells, increased abomasal pH due to disruption of parietal cell function, and a resultant failure of protein digestion [3, 7]. Nematodirus battus causes a severe, acute enteropathy in lambs, presenting with profuse watery diarrhea, dehydration, and rapid weight loss. Oesophagostomum species (nodule worms) cause granulomatous inflammation of the cecal and colonic wall, predisposing to chronic ill-thrift.

Secondary impacts include reduced feed conversion efficiency, decreased wool growth, lowered reproductive performance, and increased susceptibility to concurrent infections [8, 9]. From an immunological perspective, the host response is Th2-mediated, with high levels of IgE and interleukins (IL-4, IL-5, IL-13) driving mastocytosis and eosinophilia; however, the immunosuppressive effect of H. contortus excretory-secretory products can partially abrogate protective immunity [2, 14].

Morphological and Molecular Identification

Traditional identification of GINs relies on morphological examination of adult worms recovered at necropsy, with key features including spicule morphology, buccal capsule anatomy, and synlophe structure. H. contortus is identified by its slender, red-striped appearance due to the blood-filled intestine intertwined with the white uterus in females (barber's pole worm), along with a prominent, toothed buccal capsule [13, 14]. Teladorsagia species are identified by their small size and characteristic copulatory bursa in males.

However, morphological identification is laborious and often inconclusive for mixed-species infections. Molecular diagnostic techniques have thus become the gold standard for species-level identification and community profiling [15, 5, 16]. The ITS-1/5.8S/ITS-2 ribosomal DNA region is the preferred marker for nemabiome metabarcoding, as it provides species-specific length polymorphisms and sequence variation [15, 17, 18, 19]. Long-read sequencing of this region using high-throughput platforms enables comprehensive characterization of GIN diversity in fecal samples, revealing the relative abundance of co-infecting species such as H. contortus, T. circumcincta, Trichostrongylus colubriformis, and Cooperia curticei [15, 17, 18, 19].

PCR-based semi-quantitative assays using species-specific primers have been validated for the simultaneous detection of up to six GIN species from fecal DNA extracts, achieving high sensitivity and specificity down to 1 egg per gram (EPG) [16]. Multiplex real-time PCR panels targeting the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) regions provide rapid turnaround times suitable for diagnostic laboratory workflows [16]. The use of such molecular tools has dramatically improved the resolution of epidemiological surveillance and resistance detection [20, 21].

For further reading on diagnostic techniques, consult Gastrointestinal Parasites of Sheep: Diagnosis and Management and Common Sheep Parasites: Identification, Egg Detection, and Anthelmintic Treatment.

Diagnostic Approaches

Fecal Egg Counts (FECs)

Quantitative FECs using modified McMaster or FLOTAC techniques remain the most widely accessible method for estimating parasite burden and monitoring drug efficacy [22, 16]. A FEC below 200 EPG is typically considered low in weaned lambs, while counts exceeding 1000 EPG in growing animals warrant therapeutic intervention, especially for H. contortus-dominant infections [22]. The fecal egg count reduction test (FECRT) is the standard method for in vivo assessment of anthelmintic resistance, with a reduction less than 95% and a lower 95% confidence bound less than 90% indicating resistance [22, 20, 21].

Nemabiome Metabarcoding

Nemabiome metabarcoding using the ITS-1/5.8S/ITS-2 locus with amplicon-based high-throughput sequencing has been validated for ovine GIN communities [15, 17, 18, 19]. This approach provides relative abundance data for complex mixed infections and has been applied to study parasite community structure, transmission dynamics, and the role of refugia [15, 17, 21, 19]. The choice of bioinformatic pipeline (e.g., USEARCH, QIIME2, DADA2) significantly affects species-level resolution and relative abundance estimates, necessitating standardized analytical protocols [19].

Application-Based Decision Support

Smartphone-based decision support applications, such as the SmartWorm application, have been trialed for use on sheep farms to integrate FEC data with farm management records and generate targeted treatment recommendations [22]. These tools aim to reduce unnecessary anthelmintic usage and preserve drug efficacy.

Below is a conceptual decision tree for selecting diagnostic methods based on clinical and farm-level objectives.

flowchart TD
    A[Clinical Suspicion of GIN Infection], > B{Anemia present?}
    B, Yes, > C[FAMACHA Score 3-5]
    B, No, > D[Check for diarrhea/ill-thrift]
    C, > E[Perform FEC (McMaster)]
    D, > E
    E, > F{EPG > threshold?}
    F, High burden, > G[Species ID needed?]
    F, Low burden, > H[Re-assess husbandry]
    G, Yes, > I[Collect feces for DNA extraction]
    G, No, > J[Empiric treatment based on epidemiology]
    I, > K[ITS-1/5.8S/ITS-2 PCR & NGS]
    K, > L[Species composition & resistance markers]
    L, > M[Targeted treatment selection]
    M, > N[FECRT post-treatment]
    N, > O[Confirm efficacy]

Anthelmintic Resistance

Anthelmintic resistance (AR) is the single greatest threat to sustainable sheep production globally, involving all major drug classes including benzimidazoles (BZ), macrocyclic lactones (ML), imidazothiazoles (e.g., levamisole), and salicylanilides [4, 23, 20, 21]. Resistance is heritable and arises from selection pressure exerted by frequent treatments that remove susceptible individuals while leaving resistant worms to propagate in refugia [21]. H. contortus has developed resistance to all major anthelmintics in many regions, including parts of Africa, the Americas, Europe, and Asia [4, 5, 13, 6, 23].

Molecular markers for BZ resistance are well characterized, including single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) at codons 167, 198, and 200 of the beta-tubulin isotype 1 gene [20, 21]. Similarly, polymorphisms in the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor subunits have been associated with levamisole resistance [20]. A mixed amplicon metabarcoding and sequencing approach has been developed for surveillance of drug resistance to both levamisole and BZ in Haemonchus species, enabling high-throughput detection of resistance alleles directly from field samples [20]. Population genetic analyses of ivermectin-resistant H. contortus isolates have revealed significant genetic structure and high nucleotide diversity, indicating a polygenic basis for ML resistance [4].

Conservation agriculture practices, which minimize soil disturbance, have been shown to have no significant impact on sheep digestive parasitism, suggesting that pasture management alone cannot substitute for integrated control [8]. The role of refugia and reservoir hosts including feral goats in maintaining BZ-resistant GIN populations on shared pastures has been demonstrated, highlighting the need for multi-species management strategies [21].

For an in-depth discussion of control strategies, refer to Gastrointestinal Nematodes in Sheep: Anthelmintic Treatment Strategies and Resistance Management and Sheep Parasite Resistance: Anthelmintic Strategies and Breed-Specific Considerations.

Treatment and Control Strategies

Anthelmintic Chemotherapy

Anthelmintics should be administered based on evidence of infection, ideally guided by FEC or FAMACHA score, rather than on a fixed calendar schedule [22]. Selective targeted treatment (STT) protocols, where only animals above defined thresholds are dosed, reduce selection pressure for AR while maintaining performance [22, 4]. The FAMACHA system, used in conjunction with FEC, is particularly suited for H. contortus-dominant systems [4]. Combination anthelmintic therapy (e.g., BZ + levamisole or BZ + ML) can be employed when resistance to individual classes is confirmed, but refuge-based strategies remain essential for prolonging drug lifespan [20, 21].

Phytotherapeutic Alternatives

The potential of secondary metabolite compounds from plants such as sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas) leaves as anthelmintics against H. contortus is under investigation, demonstrating in vitro efficacy that may contribute to future integrated control protocols, particularly in resource-limited settings [24].

Integrated Parasite Management (IPM)

IPM combines grazing management (e.g., pasture rotation, mixed-species grazing, and prolonged rest periods), strategic deworming of high-risk groups (periparturient ewes and weaned lambs), and genetic selection for resistant or resilient breeds [8, 21]. Maintaining a population of parasites in refugia (unexposed to drugs) is critical to diluting resistant genotypes [21]. Additional details on control frameworks can be found in Gastrointestinal Parasites in Small Ruminants: Focus on Worms in Sheep and Intestinal Parasites in Sheep: Worms and Their Management.

Public Health and Zoonotic Considerations

While the primary GINs of sheep (Haemonchus, Teladorsagia, Nematodirus, Oesophagostomum) are not considered significant human pathogens, some species in the genus Trichostrongylus (e.g., T. colubriformis, T. axei) have been reported in humans, particularly in regions where raw vegetables contaminated with larvae are consumed or where there is close contact with infected sheep [25, 7]. The zoonotic potential of Cryptosporidium spp. and Enterocytozoon bieneusi in sympatric livestock and rodent populations, as assessed by molecular characterization, underscores the need for continued surveillance at the wildlife-livestock-human interface [25]. However, the present review does not discuss human medicine beyond these comparative host-range parallels.

For related discussions on zoonotic risks in other production systems, see Zoonotic Parasites from Chickens: Transmission, Clinical Implications, and Public Health Significance and Intestinal Parasites in Dogs: Zoonotic Risks and Public Health Considerations.

Conclusions

Gastrointestinal nematodes remain a pervasive constraint on ovine health and productivity globally. Advances in molecular diagnostics, including nemabiome metabarcoding and multiplex PCR, have revolutionized the identification and surveillance of these pathogens [15, 18, 19, 16]. The escalation of anthelmintic resistance demands a paradigm shift from reactive treatment to evidence-based, integrated parasite management that accounts for host immunity, pasture ecology, and parasite genetics [4, 8, 20, 21]. Continued research into the population genetics, co-occurrence patterns, and host-parasite coevolution of these organisms is essential to inform sustainable control programs [1, 2, 5, 6].

References

[1] Witczak MF, Spaan RS, Couch CE, et al. Co-occurrence patterns of internal parasitic nematodes and coccidia in wild bighorn sheep depend on host geography and environment. Int J Parasitol. 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42248291/

[2] Parvin S, Dey AR, Shohana NN, et al. Haemonchus contortus, an obligatory haematophagus worm infection in small ruminants: Population genetics and genetic diversity. Saudi J Biol Sci. 2024. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38854893/

[3] Yan X, He S, Liu Y, et al. Molecular identification and phylogenetic analysis of gastrointestinal nematodes in different populations of Kazakh sheep. Exp Parasitol. 2023. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37769836/

[4] Zhang Y, Wen H, Zhang H, et al. Genetic diversity analysis of IVM resistant Haemonchus contortus in sheep in inner Mongolia of China. Sci Rep. 2025. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40790080/

[5] Arsenopoulos KV, Minoudi S, Symeonidou I, et al. Extensive Countrywide Molecular Identification and High Genetic Diversity of Haemonchus spp. in Domestic Ruminants in Greece. Pathogens. 2024. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38535581/

[6] Phalatsi MS, Dawuda PM, Adeola AC, et al. Characterization and population genetics of Haemonchus contortus in Merino sheep in Lesotho. Res Vet Sci. 2023. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37856947/

[7] Hosseinnezhad H, Sharifdini M, Ashrafi K, et al. Trichostrongyloid nematodes in ruminants of northern Iran: prevalence and molecular analysis. BMC Vet Res. 2021. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34863161/

[8] ElHamdi S, Sassi L, Rekik M, et al. Conservation agriculture has no significant impact on sheep digestive parasitism. Front Vet Sci. 2023. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37808117/

[9] Beltrame MO, Moviglia GS, De Tommaso D, et al. Gastrointestinal parasites of domestic sheep from Patagonia throughout historical times: A paleoparasitological approach. Vet Parasitol Reg Stud Reports. 2023. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37652634/

[10] Fernandez-Camacho B, Barja A, Revilla LC, et al. Drone-based geospatial prediction modeling identifies Fasciola hepatica infection risk in the Cusco Highlands of Peru. Infect Dis Poverty. 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41673907/

[11] Abbas HA, Al-Azizz SA. Molecular detection of Haemonchus contortus in small ruminants in Basrah Province, Southern Iraq. Open Vet J. 2025. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41630740/

[12] Arsenopoulos KV, Gelasakis AI, Papadopoulos E. Abattoir Countrywide Survey of Dairy Small Ruminants' Haemonchosis in Greece and Associated Risk Factors. Animals (Basel). 2025. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40002969/

[13] Mohamed SA, Dyab AK, Raya-Álvarez E, et al. Molecular identification of Haemonchus contortus in sheep from Upper Egypt. Front Vet Sci. 2023. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38410120/

[14] Das B, Kumar N, Solanki JB, et al. Morphological and molecular characterization of Haemonchus contortus isolated from the small ruminants of south Gujarat, India. Helminthologia. 2023. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37745222/

[15] Charrier E, Chen R, Redman E, et al. The development and validation of long-read ITS-1/5.8S/ITS-2 nemabiome metabarcoding for ovine gastrointestinal nematodes using Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT) sequencing. Int J Parasitol. 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41997226/

[16] Reslova N, Skorpikova L, Kyrianova IA, et al. The identification and semi-quantitative assessment of gastrointestinal nematodes in faecal samples using multiplex real-time PCR assays. Parasit Vectors. 2021. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34372893/ *** Disclaimer: This article is for educational and informational purposes only. It is not intended to substitute for professional veterinary advice, diagnosis, treatment, or regulatory guidance. Always consult a licensed veterinarian or qualified specialist regarding animal health, disease diagnosis, and therapeutic decisions.

[17] Zahid O, Butler M, Hopker A, et al. Nemabiome metabarcoding shows a high prevalence of Haemonchus contortus and predominance of Camelostrongylus mentulatus in alpaca herds in the northern UK. Parasitol Res. 2024. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38698272/

[18] Sargison N, Chambers A, Chaudhry U, et al. Faecal egg counts and nemabiome metabarcoding highlight the genomic complexity of equine cyathostomin communities and provide insight into their dynamics in a Scottish native pony herd. Int J Parasitol. 2022. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36208676/

[19] Baltrušis P, Halvarsson P, Höglund J. Estimation of the impact of three different bioinformatic pipelines on sheep nemabiome analysis. Parasit Vectors. 2022. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35953825/

[20] Francis EK, Antonopoulos A, Westman ME, et al. A mixed amplicon metabarcoding and sequencing approach for surveillance of drug resistance to levamisole and benzimidazole in Haemonchus spp. Int J Parasitol. 2024. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37536387/

[21] Francis EK, Šlapeta J. Refugia or reservoir? Feral goats and their role in the maintenance and circulation of benzimidazole-resistant gastrointestinal nematodes on shared pastures. Parasitology. 2023. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37165895/

[22] Brosnahan CL, Warburton D, Cotter N, et al. Trialling the SmartWorm application in New Zealand sheep farms. Int J Parasitol Drugs Drug Resist. 2025. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41014694/

[23] Emsley E, Matshotshi A, Mathebula E, et al. Assessment of gastrointestinal nematode anthelmintic resistance and acaricidal efficacy of fluazuron-flumethrin on sheep and goat ticks in the North West province of South Africa. Vet World. 2023. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37766712/

[24] Pramu P, Nurcahyo RW, Prastowo J, et al. Potential of secondary metabolite compounds of sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas) leaves as anthelmintic against Haemonchus contortus. Open Vet J. 2025. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41630773/

[25] Li Y, Hu X, Li Z, et al. Molecular Characterization and Zoonotic Potential of Cryptosporidium spp. and Enterocytozoon bieneusi in Wild Rodents and Sympatric Livestock in Xinjiang, China. Transbound Emerg Dis. 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42007475/

[26] Zhou J, Zhang H, He Y, et al. Acute hepatic-stage infection with Cysticercus tenuicollis in Hu sheep from northeastern China: a case report. Vet Res Commun. 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41863657/

[27] Irum S, Faiz M, Aftab K, et al. Survey of internal parasites in captive ungulates from Lahore parks, Pakistan. Helminthologia. 2025. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41058775/