Gastrointestinal Parasitism in Sheep: Nematodes and Trematodes

Introduction

Gastrointestinal parasitism represents a major constraint to sheep production worldwide, causing substantial economic losses through reduced weight gain, diminished wool quality, impaired reproduction, and increased mortality [1, 2, 3]. The principal agents belong to two helminth classes: Nematoda (roundworms) and Trematoda (flukes). Both groups inhabit the gastrointestinal tract, including the abomasum, small intestine, and liver/bile ducts, and share complex life cycles that involve environmental stages and, for trematodes, intermediate molluscan hosts [4, 31]. Understanding the biology and epidemiology of these parasites is essential for designing effective control programs and mitigating the impact of anthelmintic resistance [5, 29, 33]. This article provides a detailed academic review of the etiology, epidemiology, clinical presentation, diagnostic approaches, therapeutic options, and integrated management strategies for gastrointestinal nematode and trematode infections in sheep, drawing exclusively on published peer-reviewed evidence from the provided literature.

Etiology and Major Parasites

Nematodes

The most economically important gastrointestinal nematodes (GIN) of sheep belong to the order Strongylida. Key genera include:

• Haemonchus contortus (barber's pole worm): An abomasal blood-feeding nematode that causes severe anemia, hypoproteinemia, and death in heavy infections [6, 7, 8]. Adults are up to 30 mm long and have a characteristic red-and-white striped appearance due to blood in the intestine and white ovaries [7].
• Teladorsagia circumcincta (brown stomach worm): An abomasal parasite prevalent in temperate regions; it causes abomasitis, inappetence, and reduced growth [32]. Subclinical infections impair lamb behavior and welfare [32].
• Trichostrongylus species (especially T. colubriformis and T. axei): Small intestinal (or abomasal for T. axei) nematodes that induce villous atrophy, malabsorption, and diarrhea leading to "black scours" or "bankrupt worm" syndrome [9, 35].
• Nematodirus battus: A small intestinal nematode of lambs causing high morbidity in spring due to mass hatching of overwintered eggs [10].
• Cooperia curticei: A small intestinal parasite common in young lambs, associated with periparturient rise in ewes [32].
• Strongyloides papillosus: An intestinal nematode with a unique life cycle involving both free-living and parasitic stages; skin penetration is possible [31, 35].
• Oesophagostomum columbianum (nodule worm): Forms nodules in the large intestinal wall, causing chronic inflammation and diarrhea [6, 11].

Trematodes

Two major trematode families affect sheep:

• Fasciolidae: Fasciola hepatica (liver fluke) and F. gigantica. Adult flukes reside in the bile ducts, causing cholangitis, fibrosis, and hepatic damage. The life cycle requires the intermediate snail host Galba truncatula (for F. hepatica) [33, 35]. Acute fasciolosis occurs due to massive migration of immature flukes through the liver parenchyma.
• Paramphistomidae: Paramphistomum cervi and related species (rumen flukes). Adults attach to the ruminal and reticular epithelium, causing mild pathology, but migrating juveniles can cause severe enteritis and diarrhea ("paramphistomosis") [31].
• Dicrocoeliidae: Dicrocoelium dendriticum (lancet fluke). Lives in bile ducts; uses land snails and ants as intermediate hosts. Often subclinical but can cause biliary fibrosis [10].

The phrase "worms sheep get" encompasses both nematodes and trematodes, as sheep acquire these parasites through ingestion of infective larvae (L3 for nematodes) or metacercariae (for trematodes) from contaminated pasture [3, 5, 4].

Epidemiology and Host Risk Factors

Epidemiological patterns vary by parasite species, climate, management system, and host factors.

Climate and season: Nematode transmission depends on temperature and moisture for egg hatching and L3 development. In temperate regions, a periparturient rise in fecal egg count (FEC) occurs in spring, increasing pasture contamination for lambs [2, 9]. Tropical regions permit year-round transmission [4]. N. battus eggs require a period of cold to hatch synchronously in spring [10]. Fluke transmission is linked to snail habitat availability and rainfall [33].

Host age and immunity: Lambs are most susceptible due to naive immunity [7, 12]. Acquired immunity develops after prolonged exposure but is slow against H. contortus [13]. Periparturient ewes experience a temporary relaxation of immunity, increasing FEC [2, 27]. Salivary anti-CarLA IgA, an antibody against the carbohydrate larval antigen on L3, correlates with reduced FEC and can be used to select immune-competent ewes [1, 13, 12].

Breed differences: Hair sheep breeds such as St. Croix and Katahdin show greater resistance to GIN (lower FEC, higher packed cell volume) compared to wool breeds like Dorper, though selection can improve resistance in susceptible breeds [7, 14].

Sex: Some studies report higher prevalence in females, likely due to periparturient immunosuppression [10, 31].

Nutrition: Poor nutrition exacerbates susceptibility and reduces resilience [3, 15]. Trace element deficiencies (Cu, Co, Zn, Mn) impair immunity [35]. Nutritional models indicate that protein supplementation can improve resistance [16].

Eco-management clusters: Cluster analysis combining climate and management variables (e.g., pasture vs. drylot, birth season) can predict GIN challenge: hotter, wetter regions with early pasture turnout favor higher parasitism [5].

Clinical Signs and Pathology

Clinical presentation depends on parasite burden, host age, nutritional status, and species composition.

Nematode infections:

• H. contortus: Acute cases cause pale mucous membranes (FAMACHA score 4-5), weakness, submandibular edema ("bottle jaw"), and death [7, 33]. Chronic infection leads to anemia, reduced growth, and decreased wool production [2, 3].
• Teladorsagia and Trichostrongylus: Diarrhea, weight loss, poor appetite, and ill-thrift [32]. In subclinical cases, behavioral changes include increased standing inactivity and reluctance to eat [17, 32].
• N. battus: Explosive diarrhea in lambs, dehydration, and death if untreated [10].

Trematode infections:

• F. hepatica: Acute fasciolosis causes sudden death due to liver hemorrhage and necrosis; chronic infection leads to weight loss, anemia, hypoalbuminemia, and decreased wool quality [33, 35]. Hepatic fibrosis and calcified bile ducts are seen at necropsy.
• Paramphistomum: High burdens of juvenile flukes cause watery diarrhea, anorexia, and emaciation; adult flukes are less pathogenic but can cause ruminitis [31].

Pathophysiology:

• Anemia from H. contortus results from blood loss (0.05 mL/worm/day) leading to iron deficiency [6, 7].
• Protein-losing enteropathy occurs with Trichostrongylus and Teladorsagia due to villous atrophy and increased permeability [3, 18].
• Metabolic consequences include altered amino acid metabolism, increased acute-phase proteins, and reduced growth hormone axis activity [18].

Diagnostics

Accurate diagnosis is critical for targeted treatment and monitoring resistance.

Fecal examination:

• Quantitative FEC (e.g., McMaster method, modified Wisconsin) is the gold standard for nematode egg counts [1, 13, 31]. Detection of trematode eggs requires sedimentation techniques (e.g., for Fasciola eggs) [10, 33].
• Egg morphology and size differentiate genera: strongyle-type eggs (80-100 μm) vs. Nematodirus (150-230 μm) vs. Trichuris (70-90 μm with bipolar plugs) [9, 31].
• Larval culture (third-stage larvae) is necessary for genus identification of strongyle eggs [11].

Immunological tests:

• Salivary anti-CarLA IgA ELISA: Measures mucosal immunity against GIN L3; levels ≥1.0 U/mL correlate with 20-30% lower FEC. This test can guide selection of replacement ewes [1, 19, 12]. In Canadian conditions, levels persist through winter and correlate negatively with FEC [13].
• Commercial ELISA kits for F. hepatica coproantigen detection are available for fluke diagnosis [33].

Clinical scoring:

• FAMACHA system (score 1-5 based on conjunctival color) is used specifically for H. contortus anemia assessment [5, 33]. Not sensitive for other parasites.
• Body condition scoring and fecal soiling scores (FSS) assist in monitoring flock health [17, 12].

Blood parameters:

• Packed cell volume (PCV) indicates anemia severity from H. contortus and flukes [7, 33].
• Serum albumin and total protein decrease in chronic parasitism [18].
• Eosinophilia may be present but is non-specific [27].

Molecular diagnostics:

• PCR-based assays can detect and quantify H. contortus and F. hepatica DNA in feces or tissue, offering higher sensitivity than microscopy [30].
• High-throughput sequencing of ITS-2 rDNA amplicons (nemabiome) can characterize the whole nematode community in pooled fecal samples, useful for resistance profiling.

Necropsy:

• Worm counts in abomasum and intestines are definitive for burden assessment. Counting Fasciola in bile ducts is standard for fluke.

Treatment and Anthelmintic Resistance

Anthelmintic classes

• Benzimidazoles (e.g., albendazole, fenbendazole): Bind β-tubulin, disrupting microtubule formation. Effective against nematodes and flukes (albendazole). Resistance is widespread [20, 29].
• Macrocyclic lactones (e.g., ivermectin, moxidectin): Agonists of glutamate-gated chloride channels causing paralysis. Resistance in H. contortus and Teladorsagia is common [21].
• Imidazothiazoles (e.g., levamisole): Nicotinic acetylcholine receptor agonists. Resistance less prevalent but documented [20].
• Salicylanilides (e.g., closantel): Effective against blood-feeding nematodes and flukes by uncoupling oxidative phosphorylation. Not typically used alone [21].
• Amino-acetonitrile derivatives (e.g., monepantel): Newer class (nAChR allosteric modulator) with limited resistance so far, but cases emerging.
• Spiroindoles (e.g., derquantel): Combined with abamectin; acts on nAChRs.
• Triclabendazole: The only drug effective against immature F. hepatica; resistance is a growing problem in fluke control [33].

Resistance management

Fecal egg count reduction tests (FECRT) should be used to confirm efficacy on each farm [21, 29]. Refugia-based strategies (leaving some animals untreated) slow resistance development. Combination therapy (e.g., levamisole + albendazole) can increase efficacy [21]. Phytomineral supplements (Cu, Mn) may enhance host resistance but do not replace anthelmintics [35].

Supportive treatment

For anemic sheep with H. contortus: iron supplementation and blood transfusions in severe cases [6]. For fluke: fluid therapy and liver support.

Control Strategies

Integrated control combines pasture management, genetic selection, targeted treatments, and monitoring.

Pasture management:

• Rotational grazing with breaks >21 days to decontaminate L3.
• Cross-grazing with cattle or horses (non-host species) reduces sheep-specific nematode burden [5].
• Avoid overstocking; maintain sward height >5 cm to limit larval migration.

Genetic selection:

• Select rams and ewes with low FEC and high anti-CarLA IgA after natural challenge [1, 7, 12].
• Heritability of FEC is moderate (0.20-0.31 in sheep) and selection does not adversely affect growth [7, 22, 8].
• Breed choice (e.g., Katahdin, St. Croix) offers inherent resistance [5, 14].

Targeted selective treatment (TST):

• Treat only animals exceeding FAMACHA score thresholds (e.g., score 3-5) or with high FEC [33].
• Treat ewes periparturiently only if necessary to reduce pasture contamination [2].
• Leave a proportion (refugia) of the flock untreated to maintain susceptible alleles.

Vaccination:

• Experimental vaccines against H. contortus (e.g., Barbervax) using gut antigen proteins are available in some regions but not yet widely adopted.
• Anti-CarLA immunity is naturally acquired and can be boosted through exposure [13].

Biological control:

• Nematophagous fungi (e.g., Duddingtonia flagrans) applied to feed can reduce L3 on pasture; practical limitations remain.

Nutritional support:

• Protein supplementation improves resistance in parasitized lambs [16, 15].
• Ensure adequate Cu, Co, Zn, Mn in grazing sheep to support immune function [35].

Monitoring:

• Regular FEC monitoring (every 2-4 weeks during grazing season) combined with FAMACHA scoring.
• Salivary anti-CarLA testing for replacement selection [1, 19, 12].

Decision Workflow

Below is a Mermaid diagram summarizing the integrated diagnostic and control pathway.

graph TD
    A[Pastured sheep flock], > B{Clinical signs? Anemia, diarrhea, ill-thrift}
    B, >|Yes| C[Perform FEC and FAMACHA]
    B, >|No| D[Routine monitoring: FEC every 4 weeks + FAMACHA]
    C, > E{FEC > threshold? <br/>(e.g., >800 epg strongyle)}
    E, >|Yes| F{FAMACHA score >=3?}
    E, >|No| G[Monitor pasture contamination; consider larval culture]
    F, >|Yes| H[TST treatment with effective anthelmintic class]
    F, >|No| I[Recheck in 2 weeks; if rising, treat]
    H, > J{Confirm efficacy: FECRT >95% reduction?}
    J, >|No| K[Switch anthelmintic class; perform resistance testing]
    J, >|Yes| L[Maintain refugia: leave 5-10% untreated]
    G, > M[Assess pasture management: rotation, cross-grazing]
    M, > N[Implement integrated control: genetic selection, nutrition, biocontrol]
    L, > O[Select replacements based on low FEC + high anti-CarLA IgA]
    K, > O
    O, > P[Year-round monitoring and adaptive management]

Conclusion

Gastrointestinal parasitism by nematodes and trematodes remains a persistent threat to sheep health and productivity worldwide [23, 24, 25]. The complex interplay of environmental, host, and parasite factors demands a multifaceted approach to control. The phrase "worms sheep get" encapsulates a diverse array of pathogens, but the principles of integrated parasite management (IPM) apply broadly: combine strategic anthelmintic use with pasture hygiene, genetic selection for resistance, and immunological monitoring. The emergence of anthelmintic resistance necessitates evidence-based treatment decisions guided by diagnostic data [21, 29]. Salivary anti-CarLA IgA testing offers a promising non-invasive tool for identifying animals with superior immunity, facilitating genetic improvement [1, 13, 12]. Continued research into host-parasite interactions, climate impacts, and novel control strategies (including vaccines and biological agents) will be essential for sustainable small ruminant production [5, 28, 33].

References

[1] DeWolf, B., Bauman, C., Menzies, P.I., et al. Evaluating the use of salivary anti-CarLA IgA testing to reduce gastrointestinal parasitism in Canadian pastured sheep. Veterinary Parasitology, 2025. URL

[2] Sharma, D. Dynamics of Gastrointestinal Parasitism in Sheep during Peri-parturient Period on Organized Farm. Journal of Animal Research, 2022. URL

[3] Sykes, A., Coop, R.L. Interactions between nutrition and gastrointestinal parasitism in sheep. New Zealand Veterinary Journal, 2001. URL

[4] Vassiliades, G. Gastrointestinal parasitism in sheep in Senegal. Revue d'Elevage et de Médecine Vétérinaire des Pays Tropicaux, 1981. URL

[5] Arisman, B., Burke, J., Morgan, J., et al. Clustering climate and management practices to define environmental challenges affecting gastrointestinal parasitism in Katahdin sheep. Journal of Animal Science, 2023. URL

[6] Sujith, K., Tamileniyan, E., Sneha, D., et al. Mixed Gastrointestinal Parasitism in a free-ranging Nomadic Sheep Flock: A field study from Cauvery Delta. International Journal of Biology Sciences, 2026. URL

[7] Tsukahara, Y., Gipson, T., Hart, S., et al. Genetic Selection for Resistance to Gastrointestinal Parasitism in Meat Goats and Hair Sheep through a Performance Test with Artificial Infection of Haemonchus contortus. Animals, 2021. URL

[8] Tsukahara, Y., Gipson, T., Hart, S., et al. PSXII-30 Genetic and phenotypic correlations for growth and resistance to gastrointestinal parasitism in meat goats and hair sheep. Journal of Animal Science, 2021. URL

[9] Dupati, N., Basheboina, R., Vanitha, V., et al. Seasonal Prevalence of Gastrointestinal Helminthic Parasitism in Sheep: A Regional Basis Study from Medak District of Telangana State. Journal, 2018. URL

[10] Pawar, P., Singla, L., Kaur, P., et al. Spatial Epidemiology and Risk Assessment of Gastrointestinal Parasitism in Small Ruminants Across Agroclimatic Zones of Punjab, India. Indian Journal of Animal Research, 2026. [URL](https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/51

[11] Mamatha, G., D'souza, P.E. Gastrointestinal parasitism in sheep and goats from different districts of Karnataka. Journal, 2007. URL

[12] DeWolf, B., Bauman, C., Menzies, P.I., et al. Salivary anti-CarLA IgA levels in ewes and their offspring and association with gastrointestinal parasitism and offspring performance in Ontario sheep flocks. Veterinary Parasitology, 2025. URL

[13] Borkowski, E., Avula, J., Karrow, N., et al. Correlation of salivary antibody to carbohydrate larval antigen (CarLA) with health and gastrointestinal nematode parasitism in sheep under Ontario grazing conditions. Veterinary Parasitology, 2020. URL

[14] Goetsch, A., Tsukahara, Y., Gipson, T., et al. PSXIV-18 Genetic improvement for resistance to gastrointestinal parasitism in growing meat goats and hair sheep through a centralized performance test in the southcentral USA. Journal of Animal Science, 2021. URL

[15] Vagenas, D., Bishop, S., Kyriazakis, I. A model to account for the consequences of host nutrition on the outcome of gastrointestinal parasitism in sheep: logic and concepts. Parasitology, 2007. URL

[16] Vagenas, D., Bishop, S., Kyriazakis, I. A model to account for the consequences of host nutrition on the outcome of gastrointestinal parasitism in sheep: model evaluation. Parasitology, 2007. URL

[17] Reeves, M.C., McDougall, H., Kenyon, F., et al. O-009 Early behavioural indicators of gastrointestinal parasitism in extensively farmed sheep for use in a precision livestock approach to welfare management. Animal - Science Proceedings, 2023. URL

[18] Colditz, I. Metabolic effects of host defence responses during gastrointestinal parasitism in sheep. Journal, 2003. URL

[19] DeWolf, B., Menzies, P., Bauman, C., et al. O-159 Utility of carbohydrate larval antigen salivary testing to lower the risk of gastrointestinal parasitism in Canadian sheep flocks. Animal - Science Proceedings, 2023. URL

[20] Gonzalez, H., Plaza, J., Aguirre, F. Anthelminthic activity of oxfendazole in gastrointestinal parasitism in sheep. Boletin Chileno de Parasitologia, 1979. URL

[21] Whitley, N., Burke, J., Smith, E., et al. Determining the efficacy of Red Cell in combination with anthelmintics against gastrointestinal nematode parasitism in sheep and goats. Small Ruminant Research, 2022. URL

[22] Tsukahara, Y., Gipson, T., Hart, S., et al. PSXIV-19 Heritability for growth and resistance to gastrointestinal parasitism in meat goats and hair sheep. Journal of Animal Science, 2021. URL

[23] Elkady, E.A. The relationship between gastrointestinal parasitism with the age, sex, and pregnancy in sheep. Menoufia Veterinary Medical Journal, 2025. URL

[24] Saccareau, M., Moreno, C., Ciappesoni, G., et al. Genetic-epidemiological modelling of gastrointestinal parasitism in sheep. Journal, 2015. URL

[25] McManus, C., Dallago, B., Louvandini, H., et al. Gastrointestinal Parasitism in Sheep Kept on Andropogon and Panicum Pastures in the Federal District, Brazil. Journal, 2013. URL

[26] Durrani, M., Hayat, C., Entrocasso, C., et al. Gastrointestinal parasitism in sheep and goats in Lyallpur district. Journal, 1994. URL