Section: Livestock Parasites

Beef and Parasites: Understanding Parasitic Risks in Cattle and Food Safety

Parasitic infections in beef cattle represent a substantial burden on animal health, productivity, and the safety of the human food chain. The biological complexity of these parasites, their varied life cycles, and the potential for zoonotic transmission necessitate a rigorous understanding of their epidemiology, pathophysiology, and detection [1]. This article provides a comprehensive clinical review of the major parasitic threats to cattle destined for beef production, with a focus on their biological mechanisms, diagnostic principles, and food safety implications. The discussion is confined to veterinary science and food safety, intentionally excluding direct clinical management in human patients.

Protozoan Parasites of the Bovine Alimentary Tract

Cryptosporidiosis is a highly prevalent enteric protozoan infection in cattle, particularly in neonatal calves. The parasite, principally Cryptosporidium parvum, colonizes the microvillous border of enterocytes, leading to villous atrophy, crypt hyperplasia, and malabsorptive diarrhea [2, 3]. The biophysical basis of infection involves the sporozoite ligand interaction with host cell surface glycoproteins, followed by the formation of a parasitophorous vacuole that remains intracellular but extracytoplasmic. Molecular characterization using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and sequence analysis of the 18S rRNA locus has revealed extensive genetic diversity among isolates, with subtypes varying by geographic region and host age [4, 5, 6, 7, 8]. A nationwide investigation in Cyprus identified multiple Cryptosporidium species and gp60 subtypes in dairy cattle, highlighting the role of cattle as reservoirs for zoonotic C. parvum [4]. Studies in Egypt and Thailand have reinforced the association between calf diarrhea, poor hygiene, and high oocyst shedding, which in turn increases the contamination load on pastures and water sources [6, 3]. The robust environmental resilience of Cryptosporidium oocysts, which are resistant to standard chlorination, poses a persistent risk for waterborne transmission [2, 9].

Protozoan parasites of the phylum Apicomplexa also include Eimeria species, which cause bovine coccidiosis. Eimeria bovis and Eimeria zuernii are the most pathogenic species, responsible for hemorrhagic diarrhea in young stock [10]. The life cycle involves endogenous merogony within the intestinal epithelium, culminating in the rupture of host cells and release of merozoites. The physical stress of cell lysis triggers an inflammatory cascade, with neutrophilic infiltration and tissue necrosis [10]. The sporulated oocyst, the environmental stage, demonstrates a viability profile that is influenced by temperature and humidity; a study in a tropical climate showed that sporulated oocysts of bovine Eimeria spp. could remain viable in water for extended periods, complicating biosecurity [11]. Meta-analyses of Eimeria prevalence in livestock have identified density-dependent risk factors, particularly in confined feeding operations (feedlots) [12].

Blastocystis spp. are increasingly recognized in cattle, though their pathogenic role remains ambiguous. Studies have demonstrated a high carriage rate of Blastocystis subtypes in asymptomatic dairy calves, with dynamic shifts in subtype prevalence from birth through 24 months [13]. Blastocystis subtype diversity in ruminants, including cattle, has implications for zoonotic transmission risk [14, 15]. The organism exhibits an anaerobic metabolism and a unique central body vacuole that may be involved in osmoregulation.

Entamoeba species, including Entamoeba bovis, are frequently detected in cattle feces. A molecular investigation in Hebei Province, China, identified genetically distinct Entamoeba isolates, suggesting a complex epidemiology with potential for cross-species transmission [16].

Protozoan Parasites of Bovine Tissues and Blood

Sarcocystosis is a tissue-bound protozoan infection caused by Sarcocystis spp. Cattle are intermediate hosts, harboring sarcocysts within skeletal and cardiac muscle. The definitive hosts are canids, which shed sporocysts in feces. The presence of Sarcocystis in meat products is a food safety concern due to the potential for human infection following the consumption of raw or undercooked beef [17]. Toxoplasma gondii also forms tissue cysts in bovine muscle, though the role of beef in human toxoplasmosis is relatively minor compared to pork and lamb. A systematic review and meta-analysis of toxoplasmosis in ungulates emphasized the importance of beef as a meat-borne zoonotic pathway [18]. The cyst wall of T. gondii is composed of a dense granular layer that protects the bradyzoites within. Seroprevalence surveys of T. gondii in Chinese food animals, including cattle, have demonstrated widespread exposure [19].

Neospora caninum is a major cause of abortion in cattle worldwide. The parasite has a heteroxenous life cycle with canids as definitive hosts. In cattle, transplacental transmission is highly efficient, leading to persistently infected cohorts [20]. The pathophysiology of abortion involves a Th1-biased immune response, with interferon gamma production leading to placental necrosis [21]. Experimental evidence suggests that N. caninum suppresses host long non-coding RNA expression to modulate mitochondrial function and autophagy, facilitating its intracellular propagation [22]. Seroprevalence studies in Egypt and the USA have underscored the need for biosecurity to mitigate transmission at the wildlife-livestock interface [23, 20].

Piroplasms, including Babesia bovis, Babesia bigemina, and Theileria annulata, are tick-borne apicomplexans that infect bovine erythrocytes and leukocytes, respectively. Babesia species cause hemolytic anemia, hemoglobinuria, and fever, while Theileria species cause lymphoproliferative disease (tropical theileriosis) [24]. The molecular basis of Babesia invasion involves the apical complex organelles, which secrete adhesins that bind to erythrocyte surface proteins. Trypanosoma vivax, transmitted by tsetse flies and mechanically by other biting flies, causes trypanosomiasis (nagana) characterized by anemia, weight loss, and immunosuppression [25]. Infection induces both Th1 and Th2 immunological responses, reflecting a complex host-pathogen interaction [25]. Co-infections of piroplasms with Anaplasma species (rickettsial agents) are common and have been documented in Egypt [26].

Flux Balance Analysis in Metabolic Networks: Principles, Computational Advances, and Applications in Veterinary Systems Biology offers relevant computational frameworks for modeling the metabolic interplay between these parasites and host cells, as does Network Theory in Biological Pathways: Graph Theoretical Approaches for Veterinary Systems Biology. The European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI): A Comprehensive Reference for Veterinary Computational Biology and The Role of the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) in Veterinary Virology and Molecular Diagnostics provide the bioinformatics infrastructure for analyzing genomic sequences of these pathogens, such as those derived from high-throughput sequencers.

Helminth Parasites in Beef Cattle

Fasciolosis, caused by Fasciola hepatica and Fasciola gigantica, is a trematode infection of the bovine liver. The metacercariae, ingested with herbage, excyst in the duodenum, migrate through the intestinal wall, and traverse the peritoneal cavity to penetrate the liver parenchyma [27]. The migration of juvenile flukes causes traumatic hepatitis, characterized by fibrin deposition, eosinophilic infiltration, and fibrosis. Chronic infection leads to cholangitis, biliary hyperplasia, and progressive fibrosis of the bile ducts (pipeline liver) [27]. A systematic review of bovine fasciolosis in China revealed high prevalence rates, particularly in regions with abundant snail intermediate host populations [27]. Meta-analyses from Pakistan have corroborated the significant burden of this parasite [28]. Diagnostic methodologies include coproantigen ELISA, which detects fluke excretory-secretory antigens in feces, and pooled fecal PCR for pooled screening [27]. This subject is explored further in the dedicated article Fasciolosis in Cattle and Sheep: Liver Fluke Diagnosis via Coproantigen ELISA, Pooled PCR, and Anthelmintic Resistance to Triclabendazole.

Taenia saginata is the cestode causing bovine cysticercosis. Cattle serve as the intermediate host, harboring the metacestode stage (Cysticercus bovis) in striated muscle, predominantly in the heart, masseter, and tongue [29]. The life cycle is completed when humans ingest raw or undercooked beef containing viable cysticerci, allowing the tapeworm to develop in the small intestine. The presence of C. bovis is a key meat inspection finding and a cause of carcass condemnation [29]. A study from an abattoir in central Ethiopia found a prevalence of 8.9%, with significant associations with extensive grazing management [29].

Echinococcosis, caused by Echinococcus granulosus sensu lato, is a larval cestode infection that produces hydatid cysts in the liver and lungs of cattle. The epidemiology in highly endemic areas, such as the Peruvian Andes, is driven by free-roaming dogs and extensive cattle management [30]. A human case of Echinococcus ortleppi cystic echinococcosis reported in France highlights the zoonotic risk posed by cattle-associated strains [31].

Dictyocaulus viviparus is the bovine lungworm responsible for verminous pneumonia (husk). The development of the parasite from the L3 infective stage to the adult gravid female in the bronchi takes approximately 28 days. The pathological hallmark is eosinophilic bronchitis and bronchiolitis, leading to airway obstruction and secondary bacterial pneumonia [32]. Climatic models have been developed to predict the timing of peak pasture infectivity for D. viviparus, integrating temperature and moisture variables [32]. This subject is explored further in the dedicated article Dictyocaulus viviparus: Bovine Lungworm (Husk) and Verminous Pneumonia, A Clinical and Diagnostic Guide.

The barber pole worm Haemonchus placei is a blood-sucking nematode of the abomasum and a major constraint to beef production in tropical and subtropical regions. The pathogenesis is mediated by the anticoagulant properties of the excretory-secretory products and the mechanical injury to the abomasal mucosa. Integrated control, as discussed in Haemonchus placei in Cattle: Barber Pole Worm Pathogenesis, Diagnosis, and Control in Tropical and Subtropical Regions, is essential.

Theileria orientalis is a tick-borne apicomplexan increasingly associated with anemia and jaundice in cattle. It is closely related to the agents of bovine babesiosis and anaplasmosis. This is detailed further in Tick-Borne Parasites in White-Tailed Deer: Babesia and Theileria Prevalence, PCR-Based Surveillance, and Impact on Livestock Interface.

Cestode infections of the small intestine in cattle, such as Moniezia spp., cause minor economic impact but can be a diagnostic confounder. Toxocara vitulorum is an ascarid nematode of neonatal calves, acquired via transplacental or transmammary transmission. The pathogenesis involves larval migration through the liver and lungs, causing hepatitis and pneumonitis.

Fascioloides magna (the giant liver fluke) can cause extensive liver damage in cattle, particularly in regions where it coexists with F. hepatica.

Parafilaria bovicola is a filarial nematode that causes eosinophilic granulomas in the subcutaneous tissue and muscles, leading to carcass trimming at slaughter.

Trichinella spp. are zoonotic nematodes that can be acquired by cattle through the ingestion of infected rodent carcasses, though the role of beef in human trichinellosis is negligible compared to pork or game meat [33].

Trichomoniasis, caused by Tritrichomonas foetus, is a venereal protozoan disease that causes infertility, pyometra, and early embryonic death. It remains a significant reproductive concern in beef herds, particularly in non-artificial insemination operations. Tetratrichomonas buttreyi and Pentatrichomonas hominis have also been identified in cattle feces in Shanxi Province, China [34].

The ciliate Buxtonella sulcata is a parasite of the cecum and colon of cattle. Its clinical significance is uncertain, but it is morphologically similar to Balantidium coli.

Neobalantidium coli has also been reported in ruminants.

Cryptosporidium parvum is a potential foodborne hazard when manure contaminates beef carcasses at slaughter.

Cyclospora cayetanensis is a foodborne coccidian that has been detected in cattle, though it is primarily associated with waterborne outbreaks in humans [35].

Blastocystis subtypes of zoonotic potential have been identified in bovine feces, highlighting a potential for transmission from farm to fork [14, 15].

Sarcocystis hominis is the species most frequently associated with human intestinal sarcocystosis from beef consumption.

Trypanosoma theileri is a non-pathogenic trypanosome found in cattle worldwide.

Besnoitia besnoiti is an apicomplexan parasite that causes besnoitiosis, characterized by sclero dermatitis and cyst formation in connective tissue. A cross-sectional serological study on a beef cattle farm in Portugal highlighted its persistence in endemic herds [36].

Parasite-Host Interaction and Immune Evasion

Many of the parasites affecting cattle have evolved sophisticated mechanisms to subvert host immunity. N. caninum suppresses the expression of host lncRNA XR_001919077.1 to modulate mitochondrial function and autophagy [22]. Trypanosoma vivax elicits both Th1 and Th2 immunological responses [25]. Haemonchus contortus is not a significant parasite of cattle, but Haemonchus placei is an important abomasal blood-sucking nematode of cattle in the tropics and subtropics. Ostertagia ostertagi is the brown stomach worm and a major parasitic cause of production loss in temperate beef cattle.

Cooperia oncophora is a small intestinal nematode of cattle.

Nematodirus helvetianus is a cause of diarrhea in young cattle.

Trichostrongylus axei is a stomach worm of cattle.

Oesophagostomum radiatum is a nodular worm of the large intestine.

Chabertia ovina is a large intestinal nematode most often seen in sheep but reported in cattle.

Bunostomum phlebotomum is the hookworm of cattle.

Strongyloides papillosus is a threadworm of cattle.

Capillaria bovis is a whipworm of the small intestine.

Trichuris discolor is a whipworm of the large intestine.

Skrjabinema spp. are pinworms of cattle.

Paramphistomum spp. (stomach flukes) cause paramphistomosis, characterized by diarrhea and ill thrift.

Dicrocoelium dendriticum (the lancet fluke) is a trematode of the bile ducts. It is discussed in Dicrocoelium dendriticum (Lancet Fluke) in Sheep and Cattle: Bile Duct Pathology and Ant-Based Lifecycle.

Schistosoma bovis causes bovine schistosomiasis, leading to chronic wasting.

Onchocerca spp. are filariae that cause nodules in the connective tissue of cattle.

Setaria spp. are filariae of the peritoneal cavity.

Thelazia spp. are eyeworms of cattle.

Eimeria alabamensis is a cause of coccidiosis in pastured calves.

Giardia duodenalis is a protozoan parasite of the small intestine of cattle. Assemblages E and A have been identified in cattle.

Cryptosporidium andersoni is a parasite of the abomasum of cattle.

Cryptosporidium bovis is a species found in cattle.

Enterocytozoon bieneusi is a microsporidian that has been detected in raw milk and cheese from cows, raising food safety concerns [37].

The presence of Coxiella burnetii and Dientamoeba fragilis in raw milk and cheese has also been documented [37].

Dientamoeba fragilis is a protozoan of the human gut but has been detected in cattle.

The detection of Enterocytozoon bieneusi in bovine milk is a significant finding for food safety.

Dientamoeba fragilis has been molecularly confirmed in bovine milk [37].

Diagnostic Modalities

The diagnosis of parasitic infections in cattle relies on a combination of macroscopic, microscopic, immunological, and molecular techniques. Fecal flotation remains the cornerstone for helminth egg and protozoan oocyst detection, using centrifugation with zinc sulfate or Sheather's sugar solutions to exploit density gradient separation. Quantitative techniques such as the McMaster counting chamber allow for estimation of the eggs/oocysts per gram of feces, which is correlated with infection intensity.

Molecular diagnostics have revolutionized the detection and characterization of bovine parasites. PCR assays targeting the 18S rRNA gene are widely used for species-level identification of Cryptosporidium, Giardia, and Eimeria [4, 5]. High-resolution melting analysis and next-generation sequencing of the 18S rRNA locus allow for differentiation of subtypes and cryptic species. Multiplex PCR panels that simultaneously detect Cryptosporidium, Giardia, and Eimeria are commercially available in the form of lyophilized PCR tubes. Real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR) assays using TaqMan probes provide high sensitivity and specificity for detecting low-level infections, particularly in environmental samples and bulk tank milk.

Serological techniques such as enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) are used for the detection of antibodies against N. caninum, T. gondii, and B. besnoiti [20, 36]. Coproantigen ELISA kits detect F. hepatica antigens in feces.

Immunofluorescence assays (IFA) using FITC-conjugated antibodies are used for the direct detection of Cryptosporidium oocysts and Giardia cysts in fecal smears [2].

Automated microscopy and flow cytometry have been applied to the enumeration of Eimeria oocysts in feces as a tool for coccidiosis monitoring [38].

DNA aptamer-based staining has been developed for the rapid detection of Cyclospora cayetanensis oocysts [35].

The use of Eimeria acervulina as a surrogate for T. gondii oocysts in disinfection studies can help assess the efficacy of chemical and physical treatments [39].

The detection of Mycoplasma species, such as Mycoplasma haemobovis, a hemotropic mycoplasma in cattle, relies on 16S rRNA PCR [40].

Blood smear examination is used for detection of piroplasms and Anaplasma species within red blood cells [41].

Sequencing of the 18S rRNA gene for Theileria and Babesia species enables phylogenetic analysis.

Serological tests for Neospora caninum detection in cattle and dogs are available [20].

The detection of Trichomonas foetus relies on culture in Trichomonas medium or PCR from preputial or vaginal samples.

Immunodetection of Cysticercus bovis in cattle meat can be performed by ELISA.

Bulk tank milk PCR can be used for herd-level screening for Fasciola and Ostertagia.

Metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) has potential for the simultaneous detection of all parasites in a sample, but it is not yet a routine diagnostic tool in most veterinary settings.

Epidemiology and Risk Factors

Parasitic infections in beef cattle are driven by a confluence of environmental, management, and host-level risk factors. Young cattle are particularly susceptible to Cryptosporidium, Eimeria, and Nematodirus infections, with peak prevalence in the neonatal and weaning periods [13]. Seasonal patterns are evident for parasites with environmental transmission stages: Dictyocaulus viviparus shows a peak in pasture infectivity in mid-summer [32]; Eimeria oocyst survival is highest in cool, humid environments [11]; and Fasciola metacercarial burden peaks on pasture in late summer and autumn. Pasture management is critical: overgrazing increases the density of infective larvae, while rotational grazing can reduce exposure. The use of shared water resources by cattle and wildlife creates parasite exposure hotspots, as cattle aggregations at shared resources create potential parasite exposure hotspots for wildlife [42]. A multi-country study on the uptake of diagnostics for sustainable gastrointestinal nematode control highlighted that farmer perception and knowledge are key determinants of adoption [43].

Food Safety and Beef Production

The parasites of most significance for beef food safety are those that can be transmitted to humans via the ingestion of meat, offal, or contaminated water. Taenia saginata cysticercosis, Toxoplasma gondii, and Sarcocystis hominis are the primary meat-borne zoonoses. The World Health Organization has estimated the global, regional, and national burdens of foodborne parasitic diseases, including those from beef [1]. The risk of Cryptosporidium and Giardia transmission from beef arises from farm-to-fork contamination via manure, contaminated water, and cross-contamination during slaughter and processing [9]. Raw milk and cheese derived from cattle have been shown to contain Enterocytozoon bieneusi, Coxiella burnetii, and Dientamoeba fragilis, highlighting the need for pasteurization [37].

The processing of beef carcasses can be compromised by Parafilaria bovicola, which causes eosinophilic granulomas that require trimming. Fasciola hepatica causes liver condemnation and reduces the marketability of the offal. The presence of Cysticercus bovis triggers mandatory meat inspection and possible carcass condemnation. The implementation of Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Points (HACCP) systems in abattoirs is essential for managing these risks. Antimicrobial resistance is a growing concern in parasites; for example, Fasciola hepatica has developed resistance to triclabendazole, as detailed in Fasciolosis in Cattle and Sheep: Liver Fluke Diagnosis via Coproantigen ELISA, Pooled PCR, and Anthelmintic Resistance to Triclabendazole.

The public health implications of these infections are severe. The zoonotic potential of Cryptosporidium parvum from cattle is well documented [3]. Blastocystis subtypes in ruminants may be zoonotic [14, 15]. The role of cattle in the transmission of cystic echinococcosis is critical in endemic regions [31, 30]. The global burden of foodborne parasitic diseases has been systematically assessed [1]. The detection of Enterocytozoon bieneusi and Coxiella burnetii in raw milk products is a concern for public health [37].

Control Strategies

Integrated parasite management in beef cattle aims to reduce parasite burdens to subclinical levels, maintain productivity, and minimize the risk of anthelmintic resistance. Key strategies include strategic deworming programs based on local epidemiology, pasture management (resting, rotation, and cross-grazing with resistant species), and selective breeding for parasite resistance. The use of targeted selective treatments (TST) has been advocated to maintain refugia of susceptible parasites and delay the emergence of resistance.

Diagnostic monitoring is crucial for evidence-based decision-making. Regular fecal egg counts (FEC) can guide the timing of anthelmintic administration, while bulk tank milk ELISA for Ostertagia and Fasciola can indicate herd-level exposure. Biosecurity measures, including quarantine of incoming stock, hygiene in calving pens, and control of wildlife access to water sources, are critical for preventing the introduction and spread of parasites.

Vaccination is available for Dictyocaulus viviparus (lungworm) in some countries. Vaccines against Eimeria (coccidiosis) are used in cattle in some regions but are not widely available for beef production. The genetics of Neospora caninum are being studied to develop potential vaccines.

The integration of computational biology and bioinformatics, as described in Flux Balance Analysis in Metabolic Networks and Network Theory in Biological Pathways, offers tools for predicting the emergence of anthelmintic resistance and optimizing control programs. The diagram below illustrates the interactions between the host, parasite populations, diagnostic methods, and control interventions.

graph TD
    A[Beef Herd] --> B(Metacestode in Forage)
    B --> C(Intermediate Host)
    C --> D("Definitive Host: Dog")

    subgraph Diagnostic Workflow
        F(Fecal Sample)
        G(Blood Sample)
        H(Tissue Sample)

        A --> F
        A --> G
        A --> H

        F --> I("Microscopy: Flotation, McMaster")
        F --> J("Molecular: PCR, qPCR, Sequencing")
        
        G --> K("Serology: ELISA, IFA")
        G --> L("Molecular: PCR for Piroplasms")

        H --> M("Meat Inspection: Cysticercosis")
        H --> N(Histopathology)
    end

    subgraph Control Interventions
        I(Strategic Deworming)
        J(Pasture Management)
        K(Biosecurity)
        L(Vaccination)
        M(Genetic Selection)
    end

    A -.--> I & J & K & L & M

    I --> D[Reduction in Pasture Contamination]
    J --> D
    K --> D
    L --> A
    M --> A

    D --> A

The role of wildlife in the epidemiology of bovine parasites is well documented. The interface between cattle and deer, for example, in the context of Elaphostrongylus cervi or tissue cyst-forming protozoa, requires careful surveillance. The article Tick-Borne Parasites in White-Tailed Deer: Babesia and Theileria Prevalence, PCR-Based Surveillance, and Impact on Livestock Interface provides further detail on the wildlife-livestock connection. Nosema apis is a microsporidian parasite of honey bees and has no significance for cattle.

Conclusion

The parasitic landscape of beef cattle is both diverse and dynamic, comprising protozoan, helminth, and arthropod agents that impose significant pathological, economic, and food safety burdens. Advanced molecular diagnostics, including PCR and sequencing, have greatly improved our ability to identify, characterize, and monitor these parasites. Understanding the biological mechanisms of host-parasite interactions, such as the modulation of host cell signaling by N. caninum, is crucial for developing novel control strategies. Integrated management, which combines strategic anthelmintic use, pasture management, biosecurity, and diagnostic surveillance, remains the cornerstone of sustainable parasite control in beef production. Continued research and computational modeling are needed to address the challenges of anthelmintic resistance and the emergence of zoonotic parasites in the food chain.

References

[1] Robertson LJ, Minato Y, Devleesschauwer B et al. WHO estimates of the global, regional, and national foodborne burdens of 14 invasive parasitic diseases, 2000-21: an updated data synthesis. Lancet Glob Health, 2026.

[2] Gareh A, Elbarbary NK, Abd El-Halim MO et al. Cryptosporidiosis at the human-ruminant interface in Aswan, Egypt: a one health epidemiological study using microscopy, immunofluorescence, and PCR. BMC Vet Res, 2026.

[3] Gattan HS, Alshammari A, Marzok M et al. Prevalence of Cryptosporidium infection and associated risk factors in calves in Egypt. Sci Rep, 2023.

[4] Mavrides DE, Liapi M, Malas S et al. First nationwide investigation of Cryptosporidium species and gp60 subtypes in dairy cattle in Cyprus. Curr Res Parasitol Vector Borne Dis, 2025.

[5] Yan X, Guo W, Liang R et al. Prevalence and molecular characterization of Cryptosporidium spp. in cattle in central and Western Inner Mongolia, China. Front Vet Sci, 2025.

[6] Keomoungkhoun B, Arjentinia IPGY, Sangmaneedet S et al. Molecular prevalence and associated risk factors of Cryptosporidium spp. infection in dairy cattle in Khon Kaen, Thailand. Vet World, 2024.

[7] Certad G, Gantois N, Merlin S et al. Frequency and Molecular Identification of Cryptosporidium in Adult Prim'Holstein Dairy Cattle Farms in the North of France. Microorganisms, 2024.

[8] Louro M, Bexiga R, da Fonseca IP et al. Detection and molecular characterization of Cryptosporidium spp. in dairy calves in Lisbon and Tagus Valley, Portugal. Vet Parasitol Reg Stud Reports, 2024.

[9] Baazizi R, Taibi M, Senouci N et al. Prevalence and risk factors of Cryptosporidium spp. and Giardia infestation in cattle and in broiler chickens in Algeria. Vet Med (Praha), 2025.

[10] Bangoura B, Bhuiya MAI, Kilpatrick M. Eimeria infections in domestic and wild ruminants with reference to control options in domestic ruminants. Parasitol Res, 2022.

[11] Cruvinel LB, de Paula LGF, Dos Santos JCF et al. Viability time of sporulated oocysts of bovine Eimeria spp. in water and efficacy of disinfectants in a region with tropical climate. Vet Res Commun, 2024.

[12] Disfani RA, Shadfar F, Mohammadi MR et al. Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Prevalence, Species Distribution and Risk Factors of Eimeria spp. in Iranian Livestock. Vet Med Sci, 2025.

[13] Santin M, Molokin A, Maloney JG. A longitudinal study of Blastocystis in dairy calves from birth through 24 months demonstrates dynamic shifts in infection rates and subtype prevalence and diversity by age. Parasit Vectors, 2023.

[14] Rauff-Adedotun AA, Lee IL, Bathmanaban P et al. Blastocystis subtypes in ruminant livestock from Perak and assessment of zoonotic transmission risks from livestock in Peninsular Malaysia. Trop Biomed, 2025.

[15] Rehena J, Harun AB, Karim MR. Epidemiology of Blastocystis in farm animals: A review. Vet Parasitol, 2025.

[16] Yang X, Sun Y, Nan H et al. Molecular Detection and Genetic Characteristics of Entamoeba spp. in Cattle from Hebei Province, China. Acta Parasitol, 2026.

[17] Tabrizi M, Nemati S, Mohammad Rahimi H et al. Molecular investigation of Sarcocystis spp., and Toxoplasma gondii in meat products in Iran. BMC Res Notes, 2025.

[18] Amouei A, Mizani A, Arabian M et al. Prevalence of toxoplasmosis in natural ungulates as human zoonotic meat-borne pathogens: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Food Sci, 2025.

[19] Yang Z, Yuan H, Nie L et al. Deciphering the epidemiological dynamics: Toxoplasma gondii seroprevalence in mainland China's food animals, 2010-2023. Front Cell Infect Microbiol, 2024.

[20] Hamed MI, Abushahba MFN, Gareh A et al. Seroprevalence of Neospora caninum antibodies in dogs, cows, and humans in Assiut province, Egypt: a pilot study. J Parasit Dis, 2023.

[21] Hamzavi Y, Salimi Y, Ahmadi M et al. Global prevalence of Neospora caninum in rodents: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Vet Med Sci, 2023.

[22] Zhao S-S, Tao D-L, Chen J-M et al. Neospora caninum infection specifically suppresses the expression of a host lncRNA XR_001919077.1 to facilitate parasite propagation by modulating host cell mitochondrial function and autophagy. Microbiol Spectr, 2025.

[23] Minicucci LA, Carstensen M, Cornicelli L et al. Risk perception and transmission potential of Neospora caninum at the wildlife and livestock interface in Minnesota. Front Vet Sci, 2025.

[24] Selim A, Weir W, Khater H. Prevalence and risk factors associated with tropical theileriosis in Egyptian dairy cattle. Vet World, 2022.

[25] Cholota-Iza C, Torres-Arias M, Chávez-Larrea MA et al. Trypanosoma vivax elicits both Th1 and Th2 immunological responses in experimentally infected cattle. PLoS One, 2025.

[26] Hassan MR, Abdullah HHAM, El-Maadawy RS et al. Molecular detection and distribution of piroplasms and Anaplasma species and their co-infections in cattle from three Egyptian governorates. Vet Parasitol Reg Stud Reports, 2025.

[27] Lan Z, Zhang YX, Zhang AH et al. Prevalence, risk factors, and regional insights of bovine fasciolosis in China: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Trop, 2025.

[28] Rizwan M, Khan MR, Afzal MS et al. Prevalence of Fascioliasis in Livestock and Humans in Pakistan: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Trop Med Infect Dis, 2022.

[29] Fesseha H, Asefa I. Prevalence and Associated Risk Factors of Cysticercosis bovis in Bishoftu Municipal Abattoir, Central Ethiopia. Environ Health Insights, 2023.

[30] Lucas JR, Cabrera M, Falcón N et al. The role of cattle in the transmission of cystic echinococcosis in a highly endemic area of the Peruvian Andes. Vet Parasitol Reg Stud Reports, 2024.

[31] Autier B, Baldeyrou M, Jeddou H et al. Autochthonous human case of Echinococcus ortleppi cystic echinococcosis in Brittany, Western part of France. Food Waterborne Parasitol, 2025.

[32] McCarthy C, Vineer HR, Morgan ER et al. Predicting the unpredictable? A climate-based model of the timing of peak pasture infectivity for Dictyocaulus viviparus. Vet Parasitol, 2022.

[33] Mitic I, Vasilev S, Gruden-Movsesijan A. Trichinellosis: A zoonosis that still requires vigilance. PLoS Negl Trop Dis, 2026. *** Disclaimer: This article is for educational and informational purposes only. It is not intended to substitute for professional veterinary advice, diagnosis, treatment, or regulatory guidance. Always consult a licensed veterinarian or qualified specialist regarding animal health, disease diagnosis, and therapeutic decisions.

[34] Wang YX, Jia T, Wang ZR et al. Molecular Identification and Survey of Tetratrichomonas buttreyi and Pentatrichomonas hominis in Cattle in Shanxi Province, North China. Animals (Basel), 2025.

[35] Bruno JG, Sivils J, Natarajan M et al. DNA Aptamer-Based Staining and Fluorescence Microscopy for Rapid Detection of Cyclospora Cayetanensis Oocysts. J Fluoresc, 2025.

[36] Coelho J, Domingues J, Waap H et al. Epidemiological characteristics of bovine besnoitiosis (Besnoitia besnoiti) in a beef cattle farm: a cross-sectional serological assessment. Front Vet Sci, 2023.

[37] Ercan N. Molecular Investigation and Characterization of Enterocytozoon bieneusi, Coxiella burnetii and Dientamoeba fragilis in Raw Milk and Cheese: A First Report for Dientamoeba fragilis. Acta Parasitol, 2025.

[38] Smith MK, Buhr DL, Dhlakama TA et al. Automated enumeration of Eimeria oocysts in feces for rapid coccidiosis monitoring. Poult Sci, 2023.

[39] Augendre L, Escotte-Binet S, Aubert D et al. Eimeria acervulina is a promising surrogate for Toxoplasma gondii oocysts exposed to chemical and physical treatments. Exp Parasitol, 2025.

[40] Arnuphapprasert A, Nugraheni YR, Kaewthamasorn M. Hemotropic Mycoplasma in cattle and Asian water buffalo in Thailand: Revealing globally distributed sequence types and regional genetic diversity. Curr Res Parasitol Vector Borne Dis, 2025.

[41] Yousef SG, Sobhy NM, Gouda H et al. Sero epidemiological study on bovine babesiosis in cattle and buffaloes in Sharkia Governorate, Egypt. Open Vet J, 2024.

[42] Titcomb G, Hulke J, Mantas JN et al. Cattle aggregations at shared resources create potential parasite exposure hotspots for wildlife. Proc Biol Sci, 2023.

[43] Vande Velde F, Hektoen L, Phythian CJ et al. Understanding the uptake of diagnostics for sustainable gastrointestinal nematode control by European dairy cattle farmers: a multi-country cross-sectional study. Parasite, 2023.

[44] Manave EC, Nchowela GA, Miguel AR et al. High burden and multi-parasite profile of gastrointestinal infections in cattle from Limpopo District, Southern Mozambique: Epidemiology, risk factors, and One Health implications. Vet World, 2025.

[45] Perroux TA, Lie SSY, McElligott AG et al. Epidemiology and risk factors for endoparasite infection in subtropical feral cattle in Hong Kong. Int J Parasitol Parasites Wildl, 2025.

[46] Mo Z, Quan J, Xu B et al. A one health study on phylogenetics and risk of pathogenic intestinal parasites at a ranch in Inner Mongolia. One Health, 2024.

[47] Xu J, Han Q. Prevalence, Infection, and Risk to Human Beings of Toxocara canis in Domestic Food-Producing Animals. Vet Sci, 2024.

[48] Gomes-Gonçalves S, Palmeira JD, Ferreira H et al. Occurrence and Phylogenetic Analysis of Zoonotic Enteropathogenic Protist Parasites in Asymptomatic Domestic Ruminants from Portugal. Pathogens, 2023.

[49] Puentes JD, Riet-Correa F. Epidemiological aspects of cattle tick fever in Brazil. Rev Bras Parasitol Vet, 2023.

[50] Wagner L, Springer A, Koehler S et al. (1)H NMR-based metabolomics reveals metabolic changes in porcine ingesta and serum during Ascaris suum infection. Parasit Vectors, 2026.