Real-Time PCR Assay for Detection of Bovine Respiratory Syncytial Virus and Pasteurella multocida in Cattle

Introduction

Bovine respiratory disease complex (BRDC) represents a multifactorial syndrome with substantial economic impact on cattle production systems globally [1, 2]. The etiology involves a combination of viral and bacterial pathogens, with bovine respiratory syncytial virus (BRSV) and Pasteurella multocida frequently identified as primary agents [1, 2, 3]. BRSV, a member of the genus Orthopneumovirus within the family Pneumoviridae, causes acute respiratory disease, particularly in young calves [4, 5, 6]. P. multocida, a Gram-negative coccobacillus, acts as a secondary invader following viral compromise of the respiratory epithelium, though primary pathogenic strains also circulate [7, 19, 33]. Concurrent infections with BRSV and P. multocida are commonly observed in clinical BRDC cases, resulting in synergistic pathology that complicates diagnosis and treatment [2, 3].

Traditional diagnostic methods including virus isolation, antigen detection enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs), and bacterial culture remain labor intensive and time consuming [8, 9, 10, 11]. Real-time PCR assays offer superior analytical sensitivity, quantitative capacity, and rapid turnaround times [12, 3, 13, 4, 14, 10]. Multiplex real-time PCR formats enable simultaneous detection of viral and bacterial targets in a single reaction, conserving sample volume and reducing cost [12, 3, 13, 4, 5, 14]. This article provides a detailed technical description of a multiplex real-time PCR assay designed for the simultaneous detection and quantification of BRSV and P. multocida in bovine respiratory samples, with emphasis on primer and probe design, analytical validation parameters, and clinical interpretation for bovine respiratory disease diagnostics.

Primer and Probe Design

Conserved genomic regions are essential for robust primer and probe design to ensure detection across circulating strains of BRSV and P. multocida. For BRSV, the nucleocapsid (N) gene is a preferred target due to its high sequence conservation among field isolates [4, 5, 10]. The fusion (F) glycoprotein gene has also been utilized for specific detection in some multiplex formats [14]. For P. multocida, the outer membrane protein H (ompH) gene, the capsular biosynthesis genes, and the 16S ribosomal RNA gene are common targets [3, 15, 7, 33]. Capsular serogroup-specific assays targeting serogroups A, B, and E have been described, reflecting the distribution of pathogenic types in bovine pasteurellosis [33].

Probe chemistry typically employs dual-labeled hydrolysis probes (TaqMan) with a reporter fluorophore at the 5' end and a quencher at the 3' end [12, 4, 5]. Differential fluorophores (e.g., FAM for BRSV, HEX or VIC for P. multocida) enable multiplex detection within a single channel [12, 3, 13, 4, 14]. Minor groove binder (MGB) probes offer increased melting temperature (Tm) and improved discrimination of single nucleotide mismatches [4, 14]. Primer and probe sequences should be designed using alignment of available GenBank sequences to identify conserved regions. Acceptable amplicon lengths range from 70 to 150 base pairs to maximize amplification efficiency [4, 5]. In silico specificity analysis using BLAST against the non-redundant nucleotide database is mandatory to exclude cross-reactivity with host genomic DNA and commensal respiratory flora [5, 14, 15]. Cross-reactivity testing against related bovine respiratory pathogens including bovine parainfluenza virus-3, bovine herpesvirus-1, bovine viral diarrhea virus, Histophilus somni, and Mannheimia haemolytica must be performed empirically [1, 12, 13, 4, 5, 14].

Assay Validation Parameters

Validation of a multiplex real-time PCR assay for BRSV and P. multocida requires comprehensive assessment of analytical sensitivity, analytical specificity, repeatability, and reproducibility. These parameters are established using quantified synthetic RNA or DNA standards, plasmid constructs, and characterized field samples [12, 3, 13, 4, 14].

Analytical Sensitivity

The limit of detection (LOD) is defined as the lowest target copy number per reaction yielding a positive result in at least 95% of replicates [12, 4, 14]. For BRSV, LOD values for N gene-based assays typically range from one to ten copies per reaction [12, 4, 10]. For P. multocida assays, LOD values are similarly low, often within the range of one to ten genome equivalents per reaction depending on target gene copy number [3, 15, 33]. Serial tenfold dilutions of target templates across a range from 1 x 10^1 to 1 x 10^7 copies per reaction are used to generate standard curves. Amplification efficiency (E) is calculated from the slope of the standard curve using the formula E = 10^(-1/slope) - 1, and acceptable efficiency values range from 90% to 110% [4, 14]. The coefficient of determination (R^2) should exceed 0.98 [12, 4].

Analytical Specificity

Analytical specificity is evaluated by testing the multiplex assay against nucleic acid extracts from a panel of non-target bovine respiratory pathogens [1, 12, 13, 4, 5, 14, 15, 33]. This panel must include bovine parainfluenza virus-3, bovine herpesvirus-1, bovine viral diarrhea virus, bovine coronavirus, M. haemolytica, Histophilus somni, Trueperella pyogenes, and Mycoplasma bovis [3, 13, 27, 28, 29]. No cross-amplification should be observed with these non-target agents. The absence of non-specific fluorescence signals in the respective detection channels confirms probe specificity [4, 14]. Furthermore, evaluation against a panel of Pasteurella species including Pasteurella canis, Pasteurella dagmatis, and Pasteurella oralis is necessary to confirm genus-level specificity [15, 7].

Repeatability and Reproducibility

Intra-assay repeatability is determined by analyzing replicates of low, medium, and high concentration standards within a single run, and the coefficient of variation (CV) of cycle threshold (Ct) values should remain below 5% [12, 4, 14]. Inter-assay reproducibility is assessed across multiple independent runs conducted on different days, with different operators, and using different reagent lots [12, 3, 13]. CV values for Ct across runs should remain below 10% [12, 4]. The dynamic range of the assay should span at least six orders of magnitude [4, 14].

Comparison with Traditional Methods

Multiplex real-time PCR assays consistently demonstrate superior diagnostic sensitivity compared to conventional methods for BRDC pathogen detection [3, 13, 14, 11, 26]. Bacterial culture for P. multocida can produce false-negative results due to prior antimicrobial therapy, overgrowth by commensal flora, or stringent growth requirements [11, 22, 23]. Real-time PCR detects non-viable organisms and can provide quantitative data reflecting bacterial load [11, 23, 31]. For BRSV, virus isolation is slow and insensitive, and detection of viral RNA by real-time PCR correlates strongly with active infection [1, 4, 5, 8]. Antigen-capture ELISAs offer lower sensitivity compared to nucleic acid amplification, especially during the later stages of infection when viral shedding decreases [8, 9].

Workflow and Result Interpretation

A standardized workflow for the multiplex BRSV and P. multocida real-time PCR assay is summarized in the following Mermaid diagram.

flowchart TD
    A[Collection of Bovine Respiratory Sample], > B{Type of Sample}
    B, > C[Deep Nasopharyngeal Swab or Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid]
    C, > D[Nucleic Acid Extraction]
    D, > E[Multiplex Real-Time RT-PCR Setup]
    E, > F[thermal Cycling on Real-Time PCR Instrument]
    F, > G[Fluorescence Data Acquisition]
    G, > H{Analysis of Ct Values}
    H, > I[Both Targets Detected]
    H, > J[BRSV Only Detected]
    H, > K[P. multocida Only Detected]
    H, > L[No Target Detected]
    I, > M[Interpretation: Mixed Infection]
    J, > N[Interpretation: Acute Viral BRDC]
    K, > O[Interpretation: Bacterial Pasteurellosis]
    L, > P[Interpretation: Negative]
    M, > Q[Quantify Viral RNA & Bacterial DNA Load]
    N, > Q
    O, > Q
    Q, > R[Clinical Correlation & Reporting]

Acceptable respiratory specimens for this assay include deep nasopharyngeal swabs, non-endoscopic bronchoalveolar lavage fluid, and lung tissue collected at necropsy [21, 22, 29, 32]. Nucleic acid extraction is performed using silica column-based or magnetic bead-based commercial kits designed for viral RNA and bacterial DNA extraction simultaneously [3, 4, 14]. A reverse transcription step is required for the RNA genome of BRSV and can be performed as a one-step reaction combined with the PCR master mix [12, 4, 5].

A sample is considered positive for a target if the amplification curve crosses the threshold within 40 cycles [12, 4, 14]. Internal positive controls, such as an exogenous RNA or DNA template spiked into each sample prior to extraction, are essential to confirm successful nucleic acid extraction and the absence of PCR inhibitors [12, 3, 13, 4]. The interpretation of results is supported by Ct values that correlate with target load. Lower Ct values indicate higher target concentrations and are associated with more severe clinical disease in some cases [1, 27, 31].

Clinical Relevance for Bovine Respiratory Disease Complex

The clinical utility of a multiplex BRSV and P. multocida real-time PCR assay lies in its ability to provide rapid, quantitative, and etiological diagnosis during acute respiratory outbreaks in cattle [1, 2, 3, 13, 27]. Differentiation between primary viral pneumonia, secondary bacterial pneumonia, and mixed infections supports appropriate antimicrobial stewardship. Identification of P. multocida as the predominant pathogen with a high bacterial load may justify immediate antimicrobial therapy, whereas detection solely of BRSV suggests the need for supportive care and consideration of viral vaccines [2, 11, 27, 31].

Epidemiological studies utilizing these multiplex assays have demonstrated that P. multocida is frequently co-detected with BRSV in both dairy and beef calves during the first weeks after feedlot arrival [24, 30, 31, 35]. Nasal swab samples are less invasive than bronchoalveolar lavage but show moderate agreement for bacterial detection [21, 32]. Quantitative viral load data correlate with the severity of clinical signs and the duration of shedding [1, 12, 5]. The ability to differentiate P. multocida capsular serogroups using multiplex real-time PCR provides additional epidemiological information regarding strain circulation within a herd [33].

Integration of this assay into a comprehensive BRDC diagnostic panel that includes other relevant pathogens such as bovine parainfluenza virus-3, bovine viral diarrhea virus, bovine coronavirus, and Histophilus somni enhances the diagnostic completeness [12, 3, 13, 4, 14, 27]. The assay can also be linked to genomic surveillance tools to monitor the emergence of antimicrobial resistance genes in P. multocida isolates, specifically macrolide and tetracycline resistance determinants [11, 7, 23, 25].

Cross-Linking

Further information on individual pathogens and related diagnostic assays is available through the portal. Detailed biology and pathogenesis of the viral agent can be reviewed in the Bovine Respiratory Syncytial Virus reference. The bacterial counterpart is described in the Pasteurella multocida in Cattle: Bovine Respiratory Disease and Pathogenesis article. A multiplex approach for detecting additional viral agents is described in the Multiplex Real-Time RT-PCR for Simultaneous Detection of Bovine Respiratory Syncytial Virus and Bovine Parainfluenza Virus-3 article. The application of High-Throughput Real-Time RT-PCR Panel for Simultaneous Detection and Subtyping of Avian Influenza Virus, Newcastle Disease Virus, and Infectious Bronchitis Virus in Poultry demonstrates the platform utility across species.

Conclusions

The multiplex real-time PCR assay described herein provides a robust, sensitive, and specific method for the simultaneous detection of BRSV and P. multocida in bovine respiratory specimens. Rigorous validation of analytical parameters including sensitivity, specificity, repeatability, and reproducibility supports its application in both clinical diagnostics and epidemiological surveillance. Quantitative results aid in the interpretation of infection dynamics and support clinical decision making. Incorporation of this assay into routine BRDC diagnostic workflows improves the accuracy of etiological diagnosis and contributes to targeted intervention strategies.

References

[1] Ban Y, Zhang F, Zhang Z et al. Molecular investigation and viral load analysis of bovine respiratory syncytial virus in cattle with bovine respiratory disease complex in Inner Mongolia, China. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41769344/

[2] Perotta JH, Silva IV, Rodriguez MC et al. Outbreak of Respiratory Disease Due to Bovine Respiratory Syncytial Virus with Concomitant Infections by Histophilus somni and Pasteurella multocida in Adult Dairy Cows and Calves from Southern Brazil. Animals (Basel). 2025. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41153942/

[3] Hao F, Tao C, Xiao R et al. Development of a Multiplex Real-Time PCR Assay for the Detection of Eight Pathogens Associated with Bovine Respiratory Disease Complex from Clinical Samples. Microorganisms. 2025. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40732137/

[4] Hao F, Fu J, Chen J et al. Establishment of a duplex TaqMan-based real time RT-PCR assay for simultaneous detection of BRSV and BVDV. Front Vet Sci. 2024. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39559537/

[5] Zhang J, Wang W, Yang M et al. Development of a One-Step Multiplex Real-Time PCR Assay for the Detection of Viral Pathogens Associated With the Bovine Respiratory Disease Complex. Front Vet Sci. 2022. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35155658/

[6] Uehara M, Matsuda K, Sugano M et al. A new high-speed droplet-real-time polymerase chain reaction method can detect bovine respiratory syncytial virus in less than 10 min. J Vet Med Sci. 2014. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24285011/

[7] Ahmadi A, Oma VS, Ånestad LM et

[8] Timsit E, Maingourd C, Le Dréan E et al. Evaluation of a commercial real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction kit for the diagnosis of Bovine respiratory syncytial virus infection. J Vet Diagn Invest. 2010. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20224083/

[9] Quinting B, Robert B, Letellier C et al. Development of a 1-step enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for the rapid diagnosis of bovine respiratory syncytial virus in postmortem specimens. J Vet Diagn Invest. 2007. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17459851/

[10] Achenbach JE, Topliff CL, Vassilev VB et al. Detection and quantitation of bovine respiratory syncytial virus using real-time quantitative RT-PCR and quantitative competitive RT-PCR assays. J Virol Methods. 2004. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15350726/

[11] Ates MB, Ortatatli M, Terzi F et al. Detection of Pasteurella multocida and macrolide resistance genes in calf pneumonia: an immunohistochemical and molecular approach. Trop Anim Health Prod. 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42257921/

[12] Zulauf B, Pastey MK. Field-validated multiplex RT-qPCR for simultaneous detection of bovine respiratory syncytial virus and bovine parainfluenza virus-3 in bovine respiratory samples. Front Vet Sci. 2025. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40948632/

[13] Li L, Jiang Q, Li S et al. Establishment of a multiplex qPCR assay for the detection of pathogens associated with bovine respiratory disease complex. Front Vet Sci. 2025. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40331218/

[14] Kishimoto M, Tsuchiaka S, Rahpaya SS et al. Development of a one-run real-time PCR detection system for pathogens associated with bovine respiratory disease complex. J Vet Med Sci. 2017. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28070089/

[15] Zhao Z, Peng J, Lu Q et al. Development and preliminary evaluation of multiplex PCR assays for the detection of bacterial respiratory pathogens in bovine and ovine. Vet Anim Sci. 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42328207/

[16] Zhao Z, Guo Y, Liu S et al. Establishment and field validation of a rapid on-site recombinase polymerase amplification-lateral flow assay for BRSV and BVDV. Front Vet Sci. 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41834879/

[17] Hou G, Zhu S, Li H et al. Establishment of a Real-Time Reverse Transcription Recombinase-Aided Isothermal Amplification (qRT-RAA) Assay for the Rapid Detection of Bovine Respiratory Syncytial Virus. Vet Sci. 2024. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39728929/

[18] Timsit E, Le Dréan E, Maingourd C et al. Detection by real-time RT-PCR of a bovine respiratory syncytial virus vaccine in calves vaccinated intranasally. Vet Rec. 2009. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19700783/