Next-Generation Sequencing for Veterinary Pathogen Metagenomics: Principles, Workflows, and Clinical Applications

Introduction

The application of next-generation sequencing (NGS) to metagenomic analysis has fundamentally altered the landscape of veterinary pathogen detection and discovery. Unlike targeted molecular assays such as polymerase chain reaction (PCR), which require a priori knowledge of the pathogen's genetic sequence, metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) enables the unbiased detection of all nucleic acids present in a clinical sample [1, 2]. This capability is particularly valuable in veterinary medicine, where the diversity of potential pathogens across multiple host species is immense and where emerging or novel agents frequently evade conventional diagnostic panels [3, 4]. The core principle of mNGS involves the extraction of total nucleic acid from a specimen, followed by high-throughput sequencing and computational analysis to identify microbial sequences against reference databases [5, 6]. This approach has been successfully applied to a wide range of veterinary contexts, including the characterization of viral diversity in diarrheic swine feces [7], the detection of tick-borne pathogens in livestock and companion animals [3, 8], and the discovery of novel viruses in wildlife populations [9, 10]. The inherent agnosticism of mNGS makes it a powerful tool for both clinical diagnostics and pathogen surveillance within a One Health framework [4, 2].

Technical Foundations of Metagenomic Sequencing

Nucleic Acid Extraction and Library Preparation

The success of any mNGS workflow is contingent upon the quality and quantity of nucleic acid recovered from the sample. For veterinary specimens, which may include feces, blood, tissue biopsies, swabs, or arthropod vectors, the extraction protocol must be optimized to lyse a broad spectrum of microbial cell types, including hard-to-disrupt viruses, bacteria, fungi, and parasites [4, 11]. Mechanical lysis methods, such as bead-beating, are often employed to ensure the release of nucleic acids from robust pathogens [11]. Following extraction, the nucleic acid is subjected to library preparation, a process that involves fragmentation, end-repair, adapter ligation, and amplification [6]. For RNA-based metagenomics, a reverse transcription step is required prior to library construction [11]. The choice between DNA and RNA sequencing can be guided by the suspected pathogen type; RNA sequencing is particularly advantageous for detecting RNA viruses, which constitute a large proportion of emerging zoonotic agents [4, 2]. Probe-based enrichment strategies, which use biotinylated oligonucleotide probes to capture specific pathogen genomes from the metagenomic pool, have been developed to increase the sensitivity of detection for low-abundance targets [12, 13]. Hybridization capture sequencing has been shown to enhance the detection of bovine respiratory disease pathogens and associated antimicrobial resistance genes from complex samples [13].

Sequencing Platforms and Throughput

High-throughput sequencing platforms generate millions to billions of short reads per run, providing the depth necessary to detect minority populations within a metagenomic sample [6]. The fundamental chemistry of these platforms involves the clonal amplification of DNA fragments on a solid surface, followed by cyclic reversible termination sequencing [6]. Read lengths typically range from 75 to 300 base pairs, which are sufficient for taxonomic classification when compared against comprehensive reference databases [5]. Long-read sequencing technologies, which produce reads exceeding 10 kilobases, offer advantages in resolving repetitive genomic regions and assembling complete viral genomes from complex metagenomic data [6]. The choice of platform involves a trade-off between throughput, read length, cost, and turnaround time, with short-read platforms generally providing higher per-base accuracy and long-read platforms enabling more contiguous genome assemblies [6, 2].

Bioinformatics Pipelines for Pathogen Detection

The computational analysis of mNGS data is a multi-step process that transforms raw sequencing reads into actionable pathogen identifications. A typical pipeline includes quality control, host read subtraction, taxonomic classification, and visualization [5, 2]. The first step involves trimming adapter sequences and filtering low-quality reads to reduce noise [5]. Host-derived sequences, which often constitute the vast majority of reads in a clinical sample, must be removed by aligning reads to the host reference genome [4]. This subtraction step is critical for increasing the sensitivity of pathogen detection by enriching the pool of microbial reads [2].

Taxonomic classification is performed using either alignment-based or k-mer-based algorithms. Alignment-based tools map reads directly to a reference database of known microbial genomes, while k-mer-based tools decompose reads into short subsequences of length k and compare them against a pre-indexed database of k-mers from reference genomes [5]. The output of these classifiers is a list of taxa with associated read counts, which must be interpreted with caution to avoid false positives from environmental contaminants or sequencing artifacts [5]. Pipelines such as TaxTriage have been developed to provide a user-friendly, open-source framework for putative pathogen detection, incorporating steps for read filtering, taxonomic assignment, and report generation [5]. For viral metagenomics, the recovery of complete or near-complete viral genomes is often a primary goal, as it enables phylogenetic analysis and the identification of genetic markers associated with virulence or host range [4, 14, 10].

flowchart TD
    A[Clinical Sample Collection], > B[Nucleic Acid Extraction]
    B, > C{Sequencing Target}
    C, >|DNA| D[DNA Library Preparation]
    C, >|RNA| E[Reverse Transcription & cDNA Library Prep]
    D, > F[High-Throughput Sequencing]
    E, > F
    F, > G[Raw Read Output]
    G, > H[Quality Control & Adapter Trimming]
    H, > I[Host Read Subtraction]
    I, > J[Taxonomic Classification]
    J, > K[Pathogen Identification & Genome Assembly]
    K, > L[Clinical Interpretation & Reporting]

Applications in Veterinary Pathogen Discovery and Surveillance

Viral Pathogens

Metagenomic sequencing has been instrumental in the discovery of novel viruses across a wide range of animal hosts. In swine, mNGS analysis of diarrheic fecal samples has revealed a complex viral community, including known enteric pathogens and previously uncharacterized viruses [7]. The technique has also been used to characterize the genetic diversity of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) in live virus inoculation material, demonstrating its utility in quality control for vaccine development [1]. In cattle, mNGS has enabled the identification of novel astroviruses associated with enteric disease in goat kids [14] and the long-term detection of hepacivirus genotypes on a single farm [15]. The detection of a novel parvovirus circulating in canine populations, with sporadic spillover into human oropharyngeal samples, highlights the zoonotic potential of agents discovered through veterinary metagenomics [16]. Avian species have also been a rich source of novel viral diversity, with mNGS revealing multiple viruses in monk parakeets [17] and a highly divergent parvovirus in the critically endangered western ground parrot [18]. In equine medicine, NGS has been applied to the cytological and molecular characterization of viral pathogens involved in respiratory disease [19].

Bacterial and Parasitic Pathogens

Beyond virology, mNGS is a powerful tool for the detection of bacterial and parasitic agents. The technique has been used to identify a potentially undescribed columnaris-causing bacterium in rainbow trout [20] and to reconstruct the genome of Bacillus anthracis from complex environmental samples for high-throughput lineage assignment [21]. In companion animals, mNGS has facilitated the first report of Castellaniella spp. infection in dogs [22] and the metagenomic assembly of Lawsonella clevelandensis from canine external otitis [23]. The characterization of the healthy canine skin microbiome using mNGS provides a baseline against which dysbiosis associated with disease can be measured [24]. For vector-borne diseases, mNGS has been applied to ticks collected from livestock and companion animals, revealing a diverse array of bacterial, viral, and parasitic pathogens [3, 8]. The identification of phleboviruses in Rhipicephalus simus ticks expands the known host range for this viral genus [25]. In wildlife, mNGS of small mammals in Myanmar detected Wencheng shrew virus and cardioviruses [26], while analysis of Mastomys natalensis rodents in Zambia revealed evidence of multiple infectious disease agents [27].

Antimicrobial Resistance Profiling

Metagenomic sequencing can simultaneously detect pathogens and their associated antimicrobial resistance (AMR) genes, providing a comprehensive view of the resistome within a sample [28, 13]. This is particularly relevant for veterinary medicine, where the judicious use of antimicrobials is a critical concern. Hybridization capture sequencing has been shown to enhance the detection of AMR genes in bovine respiratory disease samples, allowing for the identification of resistance determinants that may be present at low abundance [13]. Analysis of the oral microbiome of grey wolves has revealed a diverse array of AMR genes, underscoring the role of wildlife as reservoirs for resistance determinants [28].

Challenges and Limitations

Despite its transformative potential, the routine implementation of mNGS in veterinary diagnostics faces several challenges. The high cost of sequencing and the requirement for specialized bioinformatics expertise remain significant barriers for many diagnostic laboratories [6, 2]. The sensitivity of mNGS for pathogen detection can be limited by the overwhelming abundance of host nucleic acid, particularly in tissue samples, necessitating the use of host depletion or enrichment strategies [4, 12]. The presence of contaminating nucleic acids in reagents and the laboratory environment can lead to false-positive results, requiring the inclusion of appropriate negative controls and rigorous bioinformatic filtering [5]. Furthermore, the interpretation of metagenomic data requires careful consideration of the clinical context, as the detection of a potential pathogen does not necessarily imply causation of disease [2]. Standardization of protocols and the development of validated, regulatory-approved workflows are needed to facilitate the broader adoption of mNGS in veterinary clinical practice [6].

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the primary advantage of metagenomic next-generation sequencing over targeted PCR for veterinary diagnostics?

The primary advantage of mNGS is its ability to detect any pathogen without requiring prior knowledge of its genetic sequence, enabling the identification of novel, unexpected, or co-infecting agents in a single assay [1, 2].

How does host nucleic acid subtraction improve pathogen detection in mNGS?

Host subtraction removes the majority of sequencing reads derived from the animal's own genome, thereby enriching the remaining dataset for microbial sequences and increasing the statistical power to detect low-abundance pathogens [4, 2].

What types of veterinary samples are suitable for metagenomic sequencing?

A wide variety of sample types are suitable, including feces, blood, serum, tissue biopsies, swabs (nasal, oral, rectal), cerebrospinal fluid, and arthropod vectors such as ticks and mosquitoes [3, 4, 8, 11, 9].

Can mNGS distinguish between live and dead pathogens?

Standard mNGS detects nucleic acids and cannot differentiate between viable and non-viable organisms. The detection of RNA may be a better indicator of recent or active infection due to its more rapid degradation compared to DNA [11, 2].

What bioinformatics resources are required for analyzing mNGS data?

Analysis requires access to high-performance computing resources, comprehensive reference databases of microbial genomes, and specialized software pipelines for quality control, host subtraction, and taxonomic classification [5, 2].

How is the clinical significance of a detected pathogen determined?

Clinical significance is assessed by considering the abundance of the pathogen's reads, the presence of the pathogen in relevant anatomical sites, correlation with clinical signs and histopathology, and the exclusion of environmental contaminants [5, 2].

What are the main limitations preventing widespread adoption of mNGS in veterinary clinics?

The main limitations include high cost, long turnaround times, the need for specialized bioinformatics expertise, challenges in data interpretation, and a lack of standardized, validated protocols for regulatory approval [6, 2].

Future Directions

The future of veterinary pathogen metagenomics lies in the integration of mNGS into routine diagnostic workflows and surveillance programs. Advances in sequencing technology are expected to reduce costs and turnaround times, making mNGS more accessible to veterinary diagnostic laboratories [6]. The development of portable sequencing devices may enable real-time pathogen detection in field settings, such as on farms or in wildlife reserves [29, 6]. Improvements in bioinformatics, including the application of machine learning for pathogen classification and the development of user-friendly interfaces, will lower the barrier to data analysis [5]. The incorporation of mNGS into One Health surveillance networks will facilitate the early detection of emerging zoonotic pathogens with pandemic potential, bridging the gap between animal and human health [4, 2]. The continued characterization of the animal microbiome will provide a deeper understanding of the complex interactions between the host, its commensal microbiota, and invading pathogens [28, 24].

References

[1] Mohammed MZ, Linhares DCL, Zeller MA et al. Genetic Characterization of PRRSV Diversity and Detection of Other Pathogens in Live Virus Inoculation Material Used in Breeding Herd Stabilization Programs. Microorganisms. 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42354835/

[2] Russell T, Formiconi E, Casey M et al. Viral Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing for One Health Discovery and Surveillance of (Re)Emerging Viruses: A Deep Review. Int J Mol Sci. 2025. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41097095/

[3] Yean S, Prasetyo DB, Chao S et al. Combining PCR and Metagenomic Approaches to Reveal Tick-Borne Pathogens in Ticks Collected from Livestock and Companion Animals in Cambodia. Pathogens. 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42347253/

[4] Russell T, Formiconi E, Murphy A et al. One health viral metagenomics for pathogen surveillance: robust mNGS workflows for viral detection and genome recovery from swab and tissue specimens. BMC Microbiol. 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42215894/

[5] Merritt B, Ratcliff JD, Ta S et al. TaxTriage: an open-source metagenomic sequencing data analysis pipeline enabling putative pathogen detection. Bioinformatics. 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41923365/

[6] Chaves M, Hashish A, Goraichuk IV et al. Nanopore sequencing in veterinary medicine: from concepts to clinical applications. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2025. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41341958/

[7] Maan S, Batra K, Rajendhran J et al. Exploring viral diversity in diarrheic porcine feces: a metagenomic analysis from an Indian swine farm. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2025. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41017909/

[8] Yang B, Zhang Y, Su S et al. Metagenomic next-generation sequencing identifies tick-carried pathogens on Tarim Red Deer in Southern Xinjiang. Open Vet J. 2025. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41630746/

[9] Pacini MI, Forzan M, Mazzei M. Fecal Sample Surveillance of the Wildlife Virome in Central Italy: Insights from the Foreste Casentinesi National Park. Animals (Basel). 2025. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41375438/

[10] Trogu T, Carrera M, Tolini C et al. Identification of Reassortant Mammalian Orthoreovirus Strains in European Hedgehogs (Erinaceus europaeus): Genomic Insights and Host Association. Microorganisms. 2025. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41011379/

[11] Shao D, Li Y, Chen S et al. Improved RNA-based metagenomic sequencing for rapid pathogen detection in pets. BMC Vet Res. 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41526915/

[12] Ferreira R, Coelho L, Santos JD et al. Probe-based metagenomic pathogen detection: advancing laboratory capacity for complex diagnosis. Front Microbiol. 2025. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41164002/

[13] Russell JN, Kos D, Yacoub E et al. Enhanced metagenomic surveillance for bovine respiratory disease pathogens and antimicrobial resistance by hybridization capture sequencing. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2025. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40928217/

[14] Li J, Baumgartner W, Wang L. Histopathologic and Genomic Characterization of a Novel Caprine Astrovirus Identified in a Boer Goat Kid in Illinois, United States. Viruses. 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41600881/

[15] Hake N, von Holtum C, Höper D et al. Identification and Long-Term Detection of Hepacivirus bovis Genotype 1 and 2 on a Cattle Farm in Germany. Viruses. 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41600842/

[16] Lu X, Kong N, Wang C et al. A novel parvovirus circulating in canine populations and sporadically detected in human oropharyngeal samples. Microbiol Spectr. 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41660847/

[17] Kanti Nath B, Gupta SD, Talukder S et al. Metagenomic Detection of Multiple Viruses in Monk Parakeet (Myiopsitta monachus) in Australia. Vet Med Sci. 2024. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39422129/

[18] Sarker S, Klukowski N, Talukder S et al. Evidence of a highly divergent novel parvovirus in Australia's critically endangered western ground parrot/kyloring (Pezoporus flaviventris). Aust Vet J. 2024. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39363816/

[19] Mazzei M, Sorvillo B, Sgorbini M et al. The Role of Viral Pathogens in Horse Respiratory Diseases: A Cytological and Molecular Approach Using Next-Generation Sequencing. Animals (Basel). 2024. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39682313/

[20] Zamparo S, Brocca G, Marroni F et al. Metabarcoding Reveals a Potentially Undescribed Columnaris-Causing Bacterium in Peracute Skin Disease of Rainbow Trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss, Walbaum). J Fish Dis. 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40579799/

[21] Podowski JC, Forrester S, Yaqub T et al. Genomic reconstruction of Bacillus anthracis from complex environmental samples enables high-throughput identification and lineage assignment in Pakistan. Microb Genom. 2025. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40549420/

[22] Bilhalva LC, Yacoub MN, Dos Santos AP et al. First report of Castellaniella spp. infection in dogs and the genomic evidence of a novel species. J Appl Microbiol. 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41604225/

[23] Tóth AG, Solymosi N, Tenk M et al. First Animal Source Metagenome Assembly of Lawsonella clevelandensis from Canine External Otitis. Pathogens. 2025. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40430785/

[24] Whittle MJ, Castillo-Fernandez J, Amos GCA et al. Metagenomic characterisation of canine skin reveals a core healthy skin microbiome. Sci Rep. 2024. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39209855/ *** Disclaimer: This article is for educational and informational purposes only. It is not intended to substitute for professional veterinary advice, diagnosis, treatment, or regulatory guidance. Always consult a licensed veterinarian or qualified specialist regarding animal health, disease diagnosis, and therapeutic decisions.

[25] Munjita SM, Mubemba B, Tembo J et al. Rhipicephalus simus ticks: new hosts for phleboviruses. Parasitology. 2024. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39523638/

[26] Paoli JE, Aung O, Lilak AA et al. Detection of Wencheng shrew virus and cardiovirus from small mammals in Myanmar. Sci Rep. 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41702980/

[27] Munjita SM, Kalonda A, Mubemba B et al. Evidence of multiple bacterial, viral, and parasitic infectious disease agents in Mastomys natalensis rodents in riverine areas in selected parts of Zambia. Infect Ecol Epidemiol. 2025. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39764202/

[28] Sakarnyte L, Spinkyte R, Merkeviciene L et al. Next-Generation Sequencing Insights into the Oral Microbiome and Antibiotic Resistance Genes in Grey Wolves (Canis lupus). Animals (Basel). 2025. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41463923/

[29] Ceruti A, Bisia M, Balatsos G et al. MosquitoID: Rapid metagenomic sequencing for offline mosquito surveillance. Acta Trop. 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41895431/

[30] Fu YT, Deng YP, Duan DY et al. Insights into the microbiota profile of Pediculus humanus capitis using metagenomic next-generation sequencing and molecular detection of unexpected pathogen DNA in Hunan Province, China. Parasit Vectors. 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42204631/

[31] Storms S, Lim A, Savard C et al. Identification of Hunnivirus in Bovine and Caprine Samples in North America. Viruses. 2025. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41305512/

[32] Kumar A, Kumar T, Batra K et al. Detection, isolation, and complete genome sequencing of pigeon torque teno virus in Indian racing pigeons with pock-like lesions. Virus Genes. 2025. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41134432/

[33] Chae JB, Kim WG, Song S et al. Molecular characterization of ten viral pathogens causing calf diarrhea in Hanwoo (Bos Taurus coreanae) by next generation sequencing. BMC Vet Res. 2025. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40660160/

[34] Nesti DR, Hayashida K, Sugi T et al. Development of a semicomprehensive detection method for paramyxoviruses and its validation using Indonesian bats. Sci Rep. 2025. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40450092/

[35] Yang Z, Zhou Y, Lin J et al. Identification and characterization of pigeon adenovirus 1 as an emerging pathogen in pigeons from Northern and Northwest China. BMC Vet Res. 2025. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40223096/