Ultrasonography and Echocardiography
1. Introduction to Diagnostic Ultrasound
Ultrasonography is a noninvasive diagnostic imaging modality that utilizes high-frequency sound waves (typically 2 to 18 MHz) to generate real-time cross-sectional images of soft tissues and fluid-filled structures [1]. The technique is founded on the biophysical principles of acoustic wave propagation, reflection, and scattering within biological media [2]. In veterinary medicine, ultrasonography has become an indispensable tool for evaluating the architecture and function of the heart (echocardiography), abdominal viscera, reproductive tract, and musculoskeletal system [3]. The modality offers distinct advantages over radiography, including the absence of ionizing radiation, the capacity for dynamic real-time assessment, and superior soft-tissue contrast resolution [4].
2. Biophysical Principles of Ultrasound
2.1 Wave Propagation and Acoustic Impedance
Ultrasound waves are mechanical pressure waves that propagate through tissue at a velocity determined by the medium's density and compressibility [5]. The speed of sound in soft tissue is approximately 1540 m/s, though it varies with tissue type: 330 m/s in air, 4080 m/s in bone, and 1480 m/s in water [6]. Acoustic impedance (Z) is defined as the product of tissue density (ρ) and the speed of sound (c) within that tissue: Z = ρ × c [7]. The magnitude of impedance mismatch at an interface between two tissues determines the fraction of incident energy that is reflected back to the transducer [8].
2.2 Reflection, Refraction, and Scattering
When an ultrasound beam encounters a boundary between tissues of differing acoustic impedance, a portion of the energy is reflected as an echo, while the remainder is transmitted into the deeper tissue [9]. Specular reflection occurs at large, smooth interfaces (e.g., organ capsules, vessel walls) and produces strong, angle-dependent echoes [10]. In contrast, scattering arises from small, irregular structures (e.g., parenchymal microarchitecture) and generates low-amplitude, omnidirectional echoes that contribute to the characteristic gray-scale texture of soft tissues [11]. Refraction, the bending of the wavefront at an oblique interface, can cause geometric distortion and misregistration artifacts [12].
2.3 Attenuation and Beam Focusing
As an ultrasound beam traverses tissue, its intensity decreases exponentially due to absorption, scattering, and reflection [13]. The attenuation coefficient (dB/cm) is frequency-dependent, with higher frequencies undergoing greater attenuation and thus providing shallower penetration [14]. For this reason, transducer frequency selection involves a trade-off between resolution (higher frequency) and depth penetration (lower frequency) [15]. Electronic beam focusing, achieved through phased-array or curved-array transducer elements, optimizes lateral resolution at a specified focal depth [16].
3. Ultrasound Instrumentation and Modes
3.1 Transducer Types
Veterinary ultrasound systems employ a range of transducer configurations. Linear-array transducers produce a rectangular field of view and are preferred for superficial structures (e.g., the equine tendon, the canine eye) [17]. Curved-array (convex) transducers generate a sector-shaped field of view, facilitating abdominal and cardiac imaging in larger patients [18]. Phased-array transducers, with a small footprint, are optimized for echocardiography through intercostal windows [19]. The transducer element, typically composed of lead zirconate titanate (PZT), converts electrical impulses into mechanical vibrations and vice versa via the piezoelectric effect [20].
3.2 B-Mode (Brightness Mode)
B-mode imaging, the standard two-dimensional gray-scale format, displays echo amplitude as pixel brightness on a monitor [21]. The dynamic range, typically 60 to 80 dB, determines the ability to distinguish subtle differences in echogenicity [22]. Tissues are described as hyperechoic (brighter than surrounding tissue), hypoechoic (darker), or anechoic (echo-free, as in fluid-filled cavities) [23]. B-mode provides the spatial framework for subsequent M-mode and Doppler interrogation [24].
3.3 M-Mode (Motion Mode)
M-mode displays a single scan line of B-mode data over time, producing a strip-chart representation of tissue motion [25]. This modality is essential for quantifying cardiac chamber dimensions, wall thickness, and valvular excursion with high temporal resolution (1000 to 2000 frames per second) [26]. M-mode measurements are used to calculate fractional shortening (FS), ejection fraction (EF), and left ventricular internal diameter in systole and diastole (LVIDs, LVIDd) [27].
3.4 Doppler Modalities
Doppler ultrasonography exploits the frequency shift of echoes returning from moving targets (primarily erythrocytes) to determine flow velocity and direction [28]. The Doppler shift (Δf) is described by the equation: Δf = 2f₀v cosθ / c, where f₀ is the transmitted frequency, v is the velocity of the target, θ is the angle of insonation, and c is the speed of sound in tissue [29].
Pulsed-Wave Doppler (PWD) samples flow at a specific depth (range gate) but is limited by the Nyquist limit in measuring high velocities [30]. Continuous-Wave Doppler (CWD) transmits and receives continuously, allowing measurement of high-velocity jets (e.g., aortic stenosis, tricuspid regurgitation) without aliasing, but lacks depth specificity [31]. Color Flow Doppler (CFD) superimposes a color-coded map of mean velocity and direction on the B-mode image, with red conventionally indicating flow toward the transducer and blue indicating flow away [32]. Tissue Doppler Imaging (TDI) filters out high-velocity, low-amplitude signals from blood to isolate low-velocity, high-amplitude signals from myocardial motion [33].
4. Echocardiography: Comprehensive Cardiac Assessment
4.1 Standard Imaging Planes
Echocardiography in companion animals (canine, feline) and large animals (equine, bovine) follows a standardized approach using right parasternal and left apical windows [34]. The right parasternal long-axis four-chamber view visualizes the left atrium, left ventricle, mitral valve, and right ventricle [35]. The right parasternal short-axis view at the level of the papillary muscles and the mitral valve provides cross-sectional measurements of ventricular dimensions [36]. The left apical five-chamber view (with the aorta) is the standard window for spectral Doppler interrogation of aortic outflow [37].
4.2 Quantitative Measurements
Left Ventricular Systolic Function. Fractional shortening (FS%) is calculated as (LVIDd - LVIDs) / LVIDd × 100, with normal values in the dog ranging from 25% to 45% [38]. Ejection fraction (EF%) is derived via the Simpson method of disks (modified biplane) or the Teichholz formula [39]. Diastolic Function. Transmitral flow patterns (E wave, A wave) and the E/A ratio are used to assess left ventricular filling pressure and diastolic dysfunction [40]. Valvular Assessment. Color flow Doppler is used to grade the severity of regurgitant jets (e.g., mitral regurgitation, tricuspid regurgitation) based on jet area relative to atrial area [41].
4.3 Common Pathologic Findings
Myxomatous Mitral Valve Disease (MMVD). This is the most prevalent acquired cardiac disease in small-breed dogs, characterized by progressive thickening, prolapse, and regurgitation of the mitral valve leaflets [42]. Echocardiographic findings include leaflet thickening, prolapse beyond the annular plane, and a regurgitant jet occupying >50% of the left atrial area in severe cases [43]. Dilated Cardiomyopathy (DCM). DCM is characterized by left ventricular eccentric hypertrophy, reduced systolic function (FS <20%), and a spherical ventricular geometry [44]. Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy (HCM). In cats, HCM presents as asymmetric left ventricular wall thickening (≥6 mm in diastole), with or without left atrial enlargement and systolic anterior motion of the mitral valve [45].
4.4 Pericardial and Effusion Assessment
Echocardiography is the gold standard for detecting pericardial effusion, which appears as an anechoic or hypoechoic space between the visceral and parietal pericardium [46]. Cardiac tamponade is diagnosed when right atrial collapse (early diastolic invagination) and right ventricular diastolic collapse are observed [47]. The presence of a mass (e.g., right atrial hemangiosarcoma, chemodectoma) should be systematically evaluated [48].
5. Abdominal Ultrasonography
5.1 Hepatobiliary System
The normal hepatic parenchyma is homogeneous and moderately echogenic, with the portal vein walls appearing hyperechoic relative to the hepatic parenchyma [49]. The gallbladder is an anechoic, ovoid structure with a thin, echogenic wall [50]. Common pathologic findings include hepatic nodular hyperplasia (benign, age-related), hepatocellular carcinoma, and cholangiohepatitis [51]. Biliary sludge, a suspension of precipitated bile components, is a frequent incidental finding in dogs and cats [52].
5.2 Urinary Tract
Renal architecture is assessed via the corticomedullary ratio, with the cortex normally being less echogenic than the spleen or liver [53]. Pyelectasis (dilation of the renal pelvis) and ureteral dilation are indicators of obstructive uropathy [54]. Cystic calculi (uroliths) appear as hyperechoic foci with distal acoustic shadowing [55]. Ultrasonography is also used to guide cystocentesis for urine culture [56].
5.3 Gastrointestinal Tract
The gastrointestinal wall is visualized as five distinct layers: the hyperechoic mucosal interface, the hypoechoic mucosa, the hyperechoic submucosa, the hypoechoic muscularis, and the hyperechoic serosa [57]. Wall thickness measurements (e.g., duodenal wall <5 mm in dogs) are used to screen for inflammatory bowel disease or neoplasia [58]. Intussusception appears as a "target sign" or "doughnut sign" on transverse imaging [59].
5.4 Reproductive Tract
Canine Prostatic Disease. Ultrasonography is used to differentiate benign prostatic hyperplasia from prostatic abscess or neoplasia [60]. Prostatic cysts appear as anechoic, well-marginated structures, while abscesses contain hypoechoic to anechoic fluid with internal debris [61]. Feline Ovarian Remnant. Ultrasonographic identification of ovarian tissue is challenging but can be aided by the detection of follicular or luteal structures [62].
6. Musculoskeletal and Tendon Imaging
Ultrasonography of the equine superficial digital flexor tendon (SDFT) and deep digital flexor tendon (DDFT) is performed using a high-frequency (7.5 to 10 MHz) linear transducer [63]. Tendon fibers are normally arranged in a parallel, hyperechoic pattern [64]. Core lesions (hypoechoic or anechoic defects) are indicative of tendinopathy or partial rupture [65]. The cross-sectional area (CSA) of the SDFT is measured at the level of the metacarpal mid-diaphysis [66].
7. Artifacts and Image Optimization
7.1 Common Artifacts
Acoustic Shadowing. This occurs distal to highly attenuating structures (e.g., calculi, bone) and appears as an anechoic region [67]. Acoustic Enhancement. This is a relative increase in echogenicity distal to a low-attenuation structure (e.g., a fluid-filled cyst or the urinary bladder) [68]. Reverberation Artifact. This appears as multiple, equally spaced parallel lines distal to a strong reflector (e.g., a gas bubble or a metal implant) [69]. Mirror Image Artifact. This occurs when a strong reflector (e.g., the diaphragm) creates a false duplicate of a structure [70].
7.2 Image Optimization
Gain, time-gain compensation (TGC), and dynamic range are adjusted to produce a uniform, well-balanced image [71]. The focal zone should be positioned at the depth of the structure of interest [72]. Harmonic imaging, which uses the second harmonic frequency of the transmitted pulse, reduces near-field artifacts and improves lateral resolution [73].
8. Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography (CEUS)
CEUS involves the intravenous administration of gas-filled microbubbles (typically 1 to 5 μm in diameter) that are encapsulated by a lipid or protein shell [74]. These microbubbles resonate nonlinearly in the ultrasound field, producing a strong, harmonic signal that is detectable by the transducer [75]. CEUS is used to characterize focal liver lesions (e.g., differentiating benign nodular hyperplasia from hepatocellular carcinoma) and to assess renal perfusion [76]. The technique is also applied in the evaluation of splenic infarction and pancreatic necrosis [77].
9. Elastography
Elastography is a noninvasive technique that measures tissue stiffness (elastic modulus) by assessing the propagation of shear waves or the degree of tissue deformation under compression [78]. In veterinary medicine, shear-wave elastography (SWE) has been applied to the liver (for staging fibrosis), the prostate, and the mammary gland [79]. Stiffer tissues (e.g., neoplasms, fibrosis) exhibit higher shear-wave velocities than normal parenchyma [80].
10. Limitations and Safety
Ultrasound is operator-dependent, with image quality and diagnostic accuracy being heavily influenced by the skill and experience of the sonographer [81]. The presence of gas (e.g., in the gastrointestinal tract or the lung) and bone prevents the transmission of ultrasound waves, limiting the evaluation of these structures [82]. Acoustic output is regulated by the mechanical index (MI) and thermal index (TI) to avoid bioeffects, including cavitation and thermal injury [83]. No adverse effects have been documented at diagnostic exposure levels in veterinary patients [84].
11. Conclusion
Ultrasonography and echocardiography are foundational diagnostic tools in veterinary medicine, providing real-time, noninvasive assessment of soft tissue architecture and function. The integration of B-mode, M-mode, Doppler, and advanced techniques (CEUS, elastography) enables comprehensive evaluation of the cardiovascular, abdominal, and musculoskeletal systems. Continued advances in transducer technology, image processing, and quantitative analysis will further enhance the diagnostic utility of this modality.
References
[1] Nyland TG, Mattoon JS. Small Animal Diagnostic Ultrasound. 3rd ed. Elsevier; 2015.
[2] Kremkau FW. Diagnostic Ultrasound: Principles and Instruments. 8th ed. Saunders; 2010.
[3] Penninck D, d'Anjou MA. Atlas of Small Animal Ultrasonography. 2nd ed. Wiley-Blackwell; 2015.
[4] Barr FJ. Diagnostic Ultrasound in the Dog and Cat. Blackwell Science; 1990.
[5] Wells PNT. Biomedical Ultrasonics. Academic Press; 1977.
[6] Bushberg JT, Seibert JA, Leidholdt EM, Boone JM. The Essential Physics of Medical Imaging. 3rd ed. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2012.
[7] Zagzebski JA. Essentials of Ultrasound Physics. Mosby; 1996.
[8] Hedrick WR, Hykes DL, Starchman DE. Ultrasound Physics and Instrumentation. 4th ed. Elsevier; 2005.
[9] Curry TS, Dowdey JE, Murry RC. Christensen's Physics of Diagnostic Radiology. 4th ed. Lea & Febiger; 1990.
[10] Webb S. The Physics of Medical Imaging. 2nd ed. CRC Press; 2012.
[11] Shung KK. Diagnostic Ultrasound: Imaging and Blood Flow Measurements. 2nd ed. CRC Press; 2015.
[12] Hoskins PR, Martin K, Thrush A. Diagnostic Ultrasound: Physics and Equipment. 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press; 2010.
[13] Hill CR. Physical Principles of Medical Ultrasonics. 2nd ed. Wiley; 2004.
[14] Szabo TL. Diagnostic Ultrasound Imaging: Inside Out. 2nd ed. Academic Press; 2014.
[15] Cobbold RSC. Foundations of Biomedical Ultrasound. Oxford University Press; 2007.
[16] von Ramm OT, Smith SW. Real-time volumetric ultrasound imaging. In: Wells PNT, editor. Advances in Ultrasound Techniques. 1980.
[17] Evans JA, McDicken WN. Doppler Ultrasound: Physics, Instrumentation, and Clinical Applications. 2nd ed. Wiley; 2000.
[18] Powis RL, Powis WJ. A Thinker's Guide to Ultrasonic Imaging. Urban & Schwarzenberg; 1984.
[19] Feigenbaum H. Echocardiography. 7th ed. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2005.
[20] Otto CM. Textbook of Clinical Echocardiography. 5th ed. Elsevier; 2013.
[21] Bonagura JD, Schober KE. Canine and Feline Echocardiography. Wiley-Blackwell; 2015.
[22] Boon JA. Veterinary Echocardiography. 2nd ed. Wiley-Blackwell; 2011.
[23] Kienle RD, Thomas WP. Echocardiography. In: Fox PR, Sisson D, Moise NS, editors. Textbook of Canine and Feline Cardiology. 2nd ed. Saunders; 1999.
[24] Thomas WP, Gaber CE, Jacobs GJ, et al. Recommendations for standards in transthoracic two-dimensional echocardiography in the dog and cat. J Vet Intern Med. 1993;7(5):247-252.
[25] Sahn DJ, DeMaria A, Kisslo J, Weyman A. Recommendations regarding quantitation in M-mode echocardiography. Circulation. 1978;58(6):1072-1083.
[26] Lang RM, Bierig M, Devereux RB, et al. Recommendations for chamber quantification. Eur J Echocardiogr. 2006;7(2):79-108.
[27] Schober KE, Fuentes VL. Feline hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. J Vet Cardiol. 2004;6(1):31-44.
[28] Quinones MA, Otto CM, Stoddard M, et al. Recommendations for quantification of Doppler echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2002;15(2):167-184.
[29] Zoghbi WA, Enriquez-Sarano M, Foster E, et al. Recommendations for evaluation of the severity of native valvular regurgitation. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2003;16(7):777-802.
[30] Nagueh SF, Appleton CP, Gillebert TC, et al. Recommendations for the evaluation of left ventricular diastolic function by echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2009;22(2):107-133.
[31] Rudski LG, Lai WW, Afilalo J, et al. Guidelines for the echocardiographic assessment of the right heart. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2010;23(7):685-713.
[32] Chetboul V, Tissier R. Tissue Doppler imaging: a new technique for the assessment of myocardial function. J Vet Cardiol. 2004;6(1):45-52.
[33] Simpson KE, Devine BC, Gunn-Moore DA. Tissue Doppler imaging in the diagnosis of feline hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. J Feline Med Surg. 2008;10(4):329-335.
[34] Dukes-McEwan J, Borgarelli M, Tidholm A, et al. Proposed guidelines for the diagnosis of canine dilated cardiomyopathy. J Vet Cardiol. 2003;5(2):7-19.
[35] Fox PR, Liu SK, Maron BJ. Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in the cat. J Vet Intern Med. 1995;9(3):173-179.
[36] Ferasin L, Sturgess CP, Cannon MJ, et al. Feline idiopathic cardiomyopathy: a retrospective study of 52 cases. J Small Anim Pract. 2003;44(8):339-345.
[37] MacDonald KA, Kittleson MD, Kass PH. Echocardiographic and clinicopathologic findings in cats with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. J Vet Intern Med. 2006;20(3):534-540.
[38] Borgarelli M, Haggstrom J. Canine myxomatous mitral valve disease. J Vet Cardiol. 2010;12(2):95-112.
[39] Haggstrom J, Kvart C, Pedersen HD. Acquired valvular heart disease. In: Ettinger SJ, Feldman EC, editors. Textbook of Veterinary Internal Medicine. 7th ed. Saunders; 2010.
[40] Pedersen HD, Haggstrom J, Falk T, et al. Auscultation of the heart in dogs with mitral valve prolapse. J Vet Intern Med. 1999;13(5):431-438.
[41] Tidholm A, Haggstrom J, Borgarelli M, et al. Canine idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. J Vet Intern Med. 2001;15(5):431-440.
[42] O'Grady MR, Horne R. Outcome of 103 dogs with dilated cardiomyopathy. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1998;212(5):678-683.
[43] Kittleson MD, Kienle RD. Small Animal Cardiovascular Medicine. Mosby; 1998.
[44] Ware WA. Cardiovascular Disease in Small Animal Medicine. 2nd ed. Manson Publishing; 2011.
[45] Nelson RW, Couto CG. Small Animal Internal Medicine. 5th ed. Elsevier; 2014.
[46] Mattoon JS, Nyland TG. Abdominal ultrasound scanning techniques. In: Nyland TG, Mattoon JS, editors. Small Animal Diagnostic Ultrasound. 3rd ed. Elsevier; 2015.
[47] d'Anjou MA, Penninck D. Liver. In: Penninck D, d'Anjou MA, editors. Atlas of Small Animal Ultrasonography. 2nd ed. Wiley-Blackwell; 2015.
[48] Biller DS, Kantrowitz B, Miyabayashi T. Ultrasonography of the urinary tract. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract. 1992;22(6):1337-1357.
[49] Lulich JP, Osborne CA, Polzin DJ. Diagnosis and management of urolithiasis. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract. 1999;29(1):1-18.
[50] Lamb CR. Ultrasonography of the gastrointestinal tract. In: Nyland TG, Mattoon JS, editors. Small Animal Diagnostic Ultrasound. 3rd ed. Elsevier; 2015.
[51] Penninck DG, Nyland TG, Fisher PE, et al. Ultrasonography of the normal canine gastrointestinal tract. Vet Radiol Ultrasound. 1989;30(6):272-276.
[52] Mattoon JS, Nyland TG. Prostate and testes. In: Nyland TG, Mattoon JS, editors. Small Animal Diagnostic Ultrasound. 3rd ed. Elsevier; 2015.
[53] Davidson AP, Baker TW. Reproductive ultrasound of the dog and cat. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract. 2009;39(4):639-658.
[54] Genovese RL, Rantanen NW, Simpson BS. The use of ultrasonography in the diagnosis of equine tendon and ligament injuries. Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract. 1986;2(3):521-534.
[55] Reef VB. Equine Diagnostic Ultrasound. Saunders; 1998.
[56] Smith RK, Webbon PM. Diagnostic imaging of the equine superficial digital flexor tendon. Equine Vet J. 1996;28(5):365-372.
[57] Gillis CL, Sharkey NA, Stover SM, et al. Ultrasonography of the equine superficial digital flexor tendon. Vet Radiol Ultrasound. 1995;36(4):322-328.
[58] Rantanen NW, McKinnon AO. Equine Diagnostic Ultrasonography. Williams & Wilkins; 1998.
[59] Denny HR, Butterworth SJ. A Guide to Canine and Feline Orthopaedic Surgery. 4th ed. Blackwell Science; 2000.
[60] O'Brien RT. Thoracic and abdominal ultrasound artifacts. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract. 1998;28(4):843-858.
[61] Kremkau FW, Taylor KJW. Artifacts in ultrasound imaging. J Ultrasound Med. 1986;5(4):227-237.
[62] Feldman MK, Katyal S, Blackwood MS. US artifacts. Radiographics. 2009;29(4):1179-1189.
[63] Cosgrove D, Harvey C, Blomley M, et al. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound. Br J Radiol. 2003;76(Spec No 1):S1-S10.
[64] O'Brien RT, Iani M, Matheson J, et al. Contrast harmonic imaging of the liver in the dog. Vet Radiol Ultrasound. 2004;45(5):451-456.
[65] Szabo TL. Diagnostic ultrasound imaging: inside out. 2nd ed. Academic Press; 2014.
[66] Sigrist B, Lutz TA, Schelling M, et al. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound of the canine liver. Vet Radiol Ultrasound. 2007;48(4):345-352.
[67] Ohlerth S, Lutz TA, Schelling M, et al. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound of the feline liver. Vet Radiol Ultrasound. 2008;49(3):267-273.
[68] Sandrin L, Fourquet B, Hasquenoph JM, et al. Transient elastography: a new noninvasive method for assessment of hepatic fibrosis. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2003;29(12):1705-1713.
[69] Castera L, Vergniol J, Foucher J, et al. Prospective comparison of transient elastography, Fibrotest, APRI, and liver biopsy for the assessment of fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C. Gastroenterology. 2005;128(2):343-350.
[70] Palmeri ML, Wang MH, Dahl JJ, et al. Quantifying hepatic shear modulus in vivo using acoustic radiation force. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2008;34(4):546-558.
[71] Nightingale KR, Palmeri ML, Nightingale RW, et al. On the feasibility of remote palpation using acoustic radiation force. J Acoust Soc Am. 2001;110(1):625-634.
[72] Sarvazyan AP, Rudenko OV, Swanson SD, et al. Shear wave elasticity imaging: a new ultrasonic technology of medical diagnostics. Ultrasound Med Biol. 1998;24(9):1419-1435.
[73] Bercoff J, Tanter M, Fink M. Supersonic shear imaging: a new technique for soft tissue elasticity mapping. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2004;51(4):396-409.
[74] Gennisson JL, Deffieux T, Fink M, et al
Disclaimer: This article is for educational and informational purposes only. It is not intended to substitute for professional veterinary advice, diagnosis, treatment, or regulatory guidance. Always consult a licensed veterinarian or qualified specialist regarding animal health, disease diagnosis, and therapeutic decisions.