Zubair Khalid

Virologist/Molecular Biologist | Veterinarian | Bioinformatician

Conventional & Molecular Virology • Vaccine Development • Computational Biology

Dr. Zubair Khalid is a veterinarian and virologist specializing in conventional and molecular virology, vaccine development, and computational biology. Dedicated to advancing animal health through innovative research and multi-omics approaches.

Dr. Zubair Khalid - Veterinarian, Virologist, and Vaccine Development Researcher specializing in Computational Biology, Multi-omics, Animal Health, and Infectious Disease Research

Section: Sequence Analysis & Algorithms

GWAS Manhattan Plot R: Structural Analysis and Computational Methodologies in Bioinformatics

Introduction to Manhattan Plot Architecture in Genome-Wide Association Studies

The Manhattan plot is a scatter plot that displays the association results from a genome-wide association study (GWAS) across all chromosomes [1]. The x-axis represents genomic coordinates arranged by chromosome, while the y-axis displays the negative base-10 logarithm of the p-value ( -log10(p) ) for each single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) tested [2]. This transformation allows the most significant associations to appear as elevated points, visually analogous to a skyline of a city [3]. Publication-grade generation of these plots in the R statistical environment forms the core of modern post-GWAS visualization pipelines [4, 1].

The structural foundation of a Manhattan plot relies on the rasterization of millions of data points, each representing a genetic marker. The computational methodology must handle large input files, often containing summary statistics for hundreds of thousands to millions of SNPs across multiple chromosomes [4]. Algorithms for plotting must optimize rendering speed without sacrificing visual resolution, a challenge addressed by heuristic downsampling approaches that preserve peak fidelity [4]. In veterinary genomics, Manhattan plots are employed for traits such as milk production in dairy cattle, feed efficiency in swine, and disease resistance in poultry, where the chromosomal architecture of the species under study must be correctly parsed [5].

Core R Packages for Manhattan Plot Construction

The qqman Package

The qqman package, developed by Turner, is a foundational tool for generating both Q-Q plots and Manhattan plots in R [1, 3]. The package accepts a data frame with columns for SNP identifier, chromosome, base-pair position, and p-value. The manhattan() function within qqman iterates over chromosomes, plotting each SNP's -log10(p) value as a point, with alternating colors to distinguish adjacent chromosomes [1]. The package supports highlighting of SNPs reaching a user-defined significance threshold, often the Bonferroni-corrected threshold, and can generate chromosome-specific plots [1, 3].

qqman has been widely adopted for its simplicity and direct integration with GWAS output formats from standard association testing software [1]. However, its architecture imposes limitations on data from non-model organisms. For example, draft genomes composed of numerous contigs or scaffolds that have not been assembled into chromosomes are not natively supported, as the package assumes a numeric chromosome identifier and sequential ordering of chromosomes [4, 1].

The fastman Package

The fastman package addresses the limitations of earlier tools by implementing a heuristic algorithm that dramatically reduces plotting time for large datasets [4]. The algorithm segments each chromosome into bins and subsamples points within each bin based on a density function, ensuring that regions with high significance (low p-values) retain full resolution while dense, non-significant regions are thinned [4]. This approach allows fastman to handle datasets from non-model organisms with non-numeric chromosome identifiers, such as those produced for livestock species with incomplete genome assemblies [4]. The package supports plotting of other GWAS statistics beyond p-values, including regression betas, odds ratios, the fixation index (FST), D-statistics, and population branch statistics (PBS) [4]. Negative values and two-tailed test results are also compatible, expanding the utility of the Manhattan plot format to selection scan analyses [4].

The hudson Package

The hudson package extends Manhattan plot functionality to phenome-wide association studies (PheWAS) and exposome-wide association studies [6]. The package provides interactive elements using the plotly framework, allowing users to hover over points to retrieve SNP identifiers and p-values [6]. hudson facilitates comparison between discovery and replication cohorts by overlaying results from multiple analyses on a single plot [6]. The package's flexible input format accepts data frames with custom column names, enhancing its adaptability to diverse veterinary and agricultural datasets [6].

The topr Package

The topr package, developed by Juliusdottir, emphasizes gene annotation of association peaks [7]. The manhattan() function within topr automatically annotates the nearest gene to each peak using user-provided gene annotation files or via integration with Bioconductor genomic ranges [7]. The package allows simultaneous display of multiple GWAS results, enabling comparison of association signals across different populations or treatment groups [7]. The annotation functionality is critical for translating statistical peaks into candidate genes for downstream functional studies.

The SNPEVG Toolkit

SNPEVG (SNP Effect Viewing and Graphing) provides a graphical user interface (GUI) for generating Manhattan plots with mouse-click operations [8]. The toolkit includes three programs: SNPEVG1 for standard Manhattan and Q-Q plots across multiple traits, SNPEVG2 for overlaying multiple traits on the same graph with customizable axes, and SNPEVG3 for displaying genotypic, additive, and dominance effects from single-locus test results [8]. The GUI approach lowers the barrier for users with limited programming experience, although it requires local installation of the executable [8].

Computational Algorithmics Underlying Manhattan Plot Generation

Coordinate System Mapping and Chromosomal Rendering

The algorithmic construction of a Manhattan plot requires mapping each SNP to a cumulative x-coordinate. For a genome with chromosomes 1 through k, the cumulative position for a SNP on chromosome i at base-pair position p is calculated as:

CumulativePos = Sum_{j=1}^{i-1} Length(Chr_j) + p

This translation allows all SNPs to be plotted along a single continuous x-axis. The rendering engine must then assign alternating colors or shades to differentiate chromosomes [1, 3]. Optimized implementations pre-compute chromosome length vectors and apply vectorized operations to avoid per-SNP loops that degrade performance in interpreted R [4, 7].

Significance Threshold Lines and Highlighting

The Bonferroni-corrected significance threshold is computed as alpha / n, where n is the total number of independent tests and alpha is the nominal significance level (typically 0.05). This threshold is plotted as a horizontal line on the Manhattan plot [2]. A suggestive significance threshold, often set at 1 x 10^{-5}, may be added as a secondary line [2]. SNPs exceeding these thresholds are highlighted in a distinct color, typically red or green, to draw visual attention [1, 3, 7].

Peak Detection Algorithms

Manual identification of peaks from Manhattan plots becomes infeasible when hundreds or thousands of phenotypes are analyzed [9]. The Manhattan Harvester tool implements automated peak detection by scanning each chromosome for regions where SNPs exhibit p-values below a sliding threshold [9]. The algorithm computes peak parameters including the lead SNP (the SNP with the lowest p-value in the region), the peak width defined by the distance between flanking SNPs returning to baseline significance, and the peak height measured as the maximum -log10(p) value [9]. A composite quality score is generated by weighting these parameters to approximate the judgment of an experienced human researcher [9]. The Cropper module provides a graphical interface for validating and refining the automated detections [9].

Handling of Non-Model Organisms

Draft genomes present a particular computational challenge for Manhattan plot generation. When a genome assembly consists of thousands of contigs or scaffolds without chromosomal assignment, traditional Manhattan plot algorithms that rely on numerical chromosome ordering fail [4]. The fastman package handles these cases by treating each contig as an independent entity and plotting them sequentially. The x-axis labels display contig identifiers, which may be alphanumeric strings [4]. This methodology is directly applicable to veterinary genomics projects studying species such as the water buffalo, bison, or various avian species with incomplete reference assemblies.

Advanced Visualization Techniques

Interactive and Three-Dimensional Manhattan Plots

BigTop extends Manhattan plot visualization into three-dimensional virtual reality (VR) [10]. The traditional Manhattan plot is wrapped around the user in a cylindrical room, with the z-axis representing minor allele frequency (MAF) of each SNP [10]. This third dimension enables the simultaneous visualization of association strength and allele frequency, allowing researchers to identify rare variants that may be missed in two-dimensional representations [10]. BigTop is built using JavaScript with React and A-Frame frameworks, rendering on VR headsets or in standard web browsers [10].

LDassoc provides an interactive web module for exploring GWAS results [11]. The tool integrates population-specific linkage disequilibrium (LD) data from the 1000 Genomes Project, variant regulatory potential from databases such as RegulomeDB, and external links to the UCSC Genome Browser [11]. Users can query genomic regions of interest and obtain interactive Manhattan plots with embedded sortable tables [11].

Colocalization and Multi-Panel Plots

The eQTpLot package enables visualization of colocalization between GWAS signals and expression quantitative trait loci (eQTL) [12, 13, 14]. The package generates multi-panel figures showing colocalization of signals, correlation of p-values, enrichment of eQTLs among trait-associated variants, and the LD landscape of the locus [12, 14]. The integration of GWAS and eQTL data in a single visualization is critical for identifying causal genes underlying association signals.

The locuszoomr package generates publication-ready regional association plots [15]. The package queries Ensembl databases for gene annotation tracks and the UCSC genome browser for recombination rate data [15]. LD information from the 1000 Genomes Project or user-provided reference panels can be overlaid on the plot [15]. The package is optimized for speed, identifying 50 peaks in a GWAS of approximately 8 million SNPs in less than one second on modern processors [15].

Comparative and Multi-Trait Views

The PheGWAS package creates a three-dimensional "landscape" by combining Manhattan plots from multiple GWAS with phenome-wide association data [16]. The z-axis represents different phenotypes, allowing visualization of pleiotropic effects across the genome [16]. Users can examine sectional views at user-defined significance strata, limiting the view to a single chromosomal region to reduce complexity [16].

ShinyAIM is a Shiny-based application for visualizing longitudinal GWAS data [17]. The application provides interactive Manhattan plots for single time points, a grid plot showing all time points simultaneously, and dynamic scatter plots for p-value-filtered markers to investigate co-localized genomic regions across time [17].

Workflow Integration and Pipelines

The computational workflow for generating Manhattan plots in R follows a structured pipeline that can be integrated into larger bioinformatics frameworks. The Mermaid diagram below illustrates the typical decision tree for selecting an appropriate R-based visualization methodology based on genome assembly status and analysis requirements.

flowchart TD
    A[GWAS Summary Statistics], > B{Genome Assembly Type}
    B, >|Complete Chromosomes| C{Number of Phenotypes}
    B, >|Draft Contigs/Scaffolds| D[fastman or topr]
    C, >|Single Phenotype| E{Interactive Needed?}
    C, >|Multiple Phenotypes| F[PheGWAS or SNPEVG2]
    E, >|Yes| G[hudson or LDassoc]
    E, >|No| H[qqman or fastman]
    H, > I{Peak Detection Automated?}
    I, >|Yes| J[Manhattan Harvester]
    I, >|No| K[Manual Inspection]
    J, > L[Regional Association Plots]
    L, > M[locuszoomr or eQTpLot]
    M, > N[Publication-Ready Figure]

The pipeline begins with GWAS summary statistics as input. If the genome assembly is complete with known chromosome assignments, the user selects a package based on the number of phenotypes under study. For a single phenotype, the choice between interactive and static plots determines the package selection. For static plots, both qqman and fastman are appropriate, but fastman offers faster rendering for very large datasets [4, 1]. If automated peak detection is required, the Manhattan Harvester pipeline is integrated [9]. Detected peaks are then processed through regional association plot generators such as locuszoomr or eQTpLot for detailed locus visualization [12, 15]. For comparative analyses involving multiple populations or time points, colocalization and multi-panel approaches are employed [16, 17].

Structural Features of a Publication-Quality Manhattan Plot

A publication-ready Manhattan plot must include specific structural elements to be interpretable without additional context. The x-axis must clearly label each chromosome, with alternating colors or shading to distinguish adjacent chromosomes [1, 3]. The y-axis must be labeled as "-log10(p-value)" and scaled appropriately to show the full range of results. A horizontal line indicating the genome-wide significance threshold, typically the Bonferroni-corrected line, is mandatory [2]. A second line for the suggestive significance threshold is recommended [2].

The plot title should reflect the trait or phenotype being studied. If multiple traits are displayed, a legend must be provided [8, 7]. Highlighting of the most significant SNPs above the threshold is standard practice, with colors chosen for clarity in grayscale printing [1]. The plot area must include the number of SNPs tested and the significance threshold value in a text annotation or in the figure legend [2, 3].

For veterinary and agricultural GWAS, annotation of peaks with nearby gene names is essential for biological interpretation [7]. The topr package and locuszoomr package both provide this functionality, with locuszoomr offering additional annotation tracks for recombination rate and LD structure [15, 7]. Ancestral genome assembly data, such as those available through the European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI), provide reference annotations for gene mapping.

Conclusion

The computational methodology for generating Manhattan plots in R has evolved substantially from the simple scatter plot implementations of early packages. Modern tools incorporate heuristic algorithms for handling large datasets, support for non-model organisms, interactive visualization through web-based frameworks, and automated peak detection for high-throughput analysis pipelines. The selection of an appropriate R package depends on genome assembly completeness, the number of phenotypes under study, the requirement for interactivity, and the need for automated annotation. Understanding the structural algorithms underlying coordinate mapping, thresholding, and peak detection is essential for producing accurate and interpretable visualizations in veterinary and agricultural genomics research.

References

[1] Turner SD. qqman: an R package for visualizing GWAS results using Q-Q and manhattan plots. bioRxiv. 2014. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c76eec87b03a014bf61c0b8f352becf6569c6856

[2] Wang J, Yu J, Lipka A, et al. Interpretation of Manhattan Plots and Other Outputs of Genome-Wide Association Studies. Methods in Molecular Biology. 2022. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/463a2340b96b6fd941be41f0804dce66a178a69e

[3] Turner SD. Annotated Manhattan plots and QQ plots for GWAS using R, Revisited. 2011. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/759ac605453ba046a5c63c2da4117f631ed2d0c1

[4] Paria S, Rahman SR, Adhikari K. fastman: A Fast Algorithm for Visualising GWAS Results Using Manhattan and Q-Q Plots in R. bioRxiv. 2026. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/638cb1674af7efc6ab88dd29df8fd4bedf9d66ef

[5] Hiersche M, Rühle F, Stoll M. Postgwas: Advanced GWAS Interpretation in R. PLoS ONE. 2013. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/653a7ae915ad3346d73149b394388bd400851ee0

[6] Lucas A, Verma A, Ritchie M. hudson: A User-Friendly R Package to Extend Manhattan Plots. bioRxiv. 2022. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/083fec362d0ece6ea3b02f594e5500342236e12d

[7] Juliusdottir T. topr: an R package for viewing and annotating genetic association results. BMC Bioinformatics. 2023. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9d7d5c6d3b82b1025ad5cacfc3817e791e7e8f4d *** Disclaimer: This article is for educational and informational purposes only. It is not intended to substitute for professional veterinary advice, diagnosis, treatment, or regulatory guidance. Always consult a licensed veterinarian or qualified specialist regarding animal health, disease diagnosis, and therapeutic decisions.

[8] Wang S, Dvorkin D, Da Y. SNPEVG: a graphical tool for GWAS graphing with mouse clicks. BMC Bioinformatics. 2012. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0f9603055e00f730fb532acb45bced90376ed1a3

[9] Haller T, Tasa T, Metspalu A. Manhattan Harvester and Cropper: a system for GWAS peak detection. BMC Bioinformatics. 2019. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9e368da7de0e7e866eba2ff804f0001725972650

[10] Westreich ST, Nattestad M, Meyer C. BigTop: a three-dimensional virtual reality tool for GWAS visualization. BMC Bioinformatics. 2019. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/73ce45652164b2494bb1a5fc980b035618cd1024

[11] Machiela M, Chanock S. LDassoc: an online tool for interactively exploring genome-wide association study results and prioritizing variants for functional investigation. Bioinform. 2018. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/730f6bb524008881a3efeef87e86b38febdc7e8e

[12] Drivas TG, Lucas A, Ritchie M. eQTpLot: a user-friendly R package for the visualization of colocalization between eQTL and GWAS signals. BioData Mining. 2021. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e3879207c7c5289332d1d2142b790156c84a8583

[13] Drivas TG, Lucas A, Ritchie M. eQTpLot: a user-friendly R package for the visualization and colocalization of eQTL and GWAS signals. 2021. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/52d20cb805e0a15478ce66700f110c19032e76fe

[14] Drivas TG, Lucas A, Ritchie M. eQTpLot: an R package for the visualization and colocalization of eQTL and GWAS signals. bioRxiv. 2020. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/eb649eea8b06c32670de72fb4df58057a613697d

[15] Lewis MJ, Wang S. locuszoomr: an R package for visualizing publication-ready regional gene locus plots. Bioinformatics Advances. 2025. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/77fb55d18fc8d886c9925b24ccc5daead88ddf20

[16] George G, Gan S, Huang Y, et al. PheGWAS: a new dimension to visualize GWAS across multiple phenotypes. bioRxiv. 2019. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d2e81d9b447e8d6f48204cc372844bfe65731aec

[17] Hussain W, Campbell MT, Walia H, et al. ShinyAIM: Shiny-based application of interactive Manhattan plots for longitudinal genome-wide association studies. bioRxiv. 2018. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ae5f50fff08b8d657f8d550826c5e57e983004ed

[18] Jawinski P. How to draw a manhattan plot using publicly available GWAS results. 2019. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5a04f36b654b42e1b7dbd0cc54ec75b24832d563

[19] Khramtsova E, Stranger BE. Assocplots: a python package for static and interactive visualization of multiple-group GWAS results. bioRxiv. 2016. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c5ca4d5855398ab335313db48f24b8d9cc495dbb

[20] Kim JH. GWAS Data Analysis. Genome Data Analysis. 2019. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0b35d3ea4c9acc1622408ad527ce75c4fec019b5

[21] Chen BY, Bone W, Lorenz KM, et al. ColocQuiaL: a QTL-GWAS colocalization pipeline. medRxiv. 2021. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f73dfe932bfc6b359ab36b8bb2c016b702601d7a

[22] Ghoussaini M, Mountjoy E, Carmona M, et al. Open Targets Genetics: systematic identification of trait-associated genes using large-scale genetics and functional genomics. Nucleic Acids Res. 2020. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3fca54afe8baac2bd5439919163b74e470822eb1