Salmonella in Poultry: Food Safety, Washing, and Risks for Infants

Etiology and Taxonomic Classification

Salmonella is a genus of Gram-negative, facultatively anaerobic, rod-shaped bacteria belonging to the family Enterobacteriaceae. The genus comprises two principal species: Salmonella enterica and Salmonella bongori. The vast majority of clinically relevant serovars in poultry and human foodborne illness belong to S. enterica subspecies enterica. Over 2,600 serovars have been identified based on the Kauffmann-White scheme, which classifies isolates according to somatic (O), flagellar (H), and sometimes capsular (Vi) antigens [1]. In poultry, the most frequently isolated serovars include Salmonella Enteritidis, Salmonella Typhimurium, and Salmonella Infantis, though regional variation is substantial [2, 3]. Host-adapted serovars such as Salmonella Gallinarum and Salmonella Pullorum cause systemic disease in avian species but are rarely implicated in human foodborne illness [4].

Epidemiology and Prevalence in Poultry

Salmonella is ubiquitous in the poultry production environment. Colonization of the gastrointestinal tract by Salmonella occurs through horizontal transmission via contaminated feed, water, litter, or fomites, and through vertical transmission via transovarian passage in laying hens [5]. The prevalence of Salmonella in broiler flocks at slaughter varies widely by geographic region and production system. In the European Union, the prevalence of Salmonella-positive broiler flocks at slaughter has been reported between 2% and 15% depending on member state and serovar [6]. In the United States, the Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS) has reported a reduction in Salmonella prevalence on raw chicken carcasses from over 20% in the early 2000s to approximately 5% in recent years, though this reduction is not uniform across all serovars [7]. The persistence of Salmonella in poultry houses is facilitated by its ability to form biofilms on surfaces such as plastic, stainless steel, and rubber, which protects the organism from disinfectants and desiccation [8].

Salmonella in Poultry: Food Safety, Clinical Aspects, and Control Strategies

A detailed discussion of the clinical manifestations of Salmonella infection in poultry, including pullorum disease and fowl typhoid, is provided in the companion article Salmonella and Escherichia coli in Poultry: Food Safety, Clinical Aspects, and Control Strategies. The present article focuses specifically on the food safety implications of Salmonella in poultry meat and eggs, with particular attention to the risks for vulnerable populations, including infants.

Salmonella Chicken Baby: Risks for Infants

Infants, defined as children under 12 months of age, represent a uniquely vulnerable population for salmonellosis. The immature immune system of neonates and infants, characterized by reduced gastric acid production, diminished intestinal mucosal barrier function, and an underdeveloped gut-associated lymphoid tissue, renders them more susceptible to Salmonella infection at lower infectious doses [9]. The infectious dose for Salmonella in healthy adults is typically 10^5 to 10^8 colony-forming units (CFU), but in infants, the infectious dose may be as low as 10^2 to 10^3 CFU [10]. Furthermore, the clinical presentation of salmonellosis in infants is more severe. Infants are at increased risk for bacteremia, meningitis, and septic shock compared to older children and adults [11]. The case-fatality rate for infant salmonellosis is estimated to be 0.5% to 1.5%, compared to less than 0.1% in immunocompetent adults [12].

The primary source of Salmonella exposure in infants is through the consumption of contaminated poultry products, particularly undercooked chicken meat, and through cross-contamination of infant foods such as pureed fruits, vegetables, and formula prepared in the same kitchen environment [13]. A study of sporadic Salmonella infections in infants found that 30% of cases were associated with the preparation of raw chicken in the home within the 72 hours preceding symptom onset [14]. The handling of raw chicken, including washing, is a critical risk factor for the transfer of Salmonella to infant feeding surfaces and utensils.

Salmonella Chicken Washing: Risks and Mechanisms

The practice of washing raw chicken under running tap water before cooking is a common consumer behavior that has been identified as a significant contributor to the cross-contamination of Salmonella in domestic kitchens [15]. The physical act of washing raw chicken generates aerosolized water droplets that can carry Salmonella cells from the surface of the carcass to surrounding kitchen surfaces. The distance of droplet dispersal has been measured at up to 1 meter from the point of washing [16]. Salmonella cells can remain viable on kitchen surfaces, including cutting boards, countertops, and sink basins, for up to 4 hours under ambient conditions [17]. The transfer of Salmonella from these surfaces to infant foods or feeding equipment can occur through direct contact or through the handling of contaminated utensils.

The mechanism of Salmonella attachment to poultry skin and muscle tissue is mediated by fimbrial adhesins, flagella, and outer membrane proteins that facilitate binding to collagen and fibronectin in the extracellular matrix [18]. Washing does not effectively remove these adherent bacteria; rather, it redistributes them. Studies have demonstrated that washing raw chicken can increase the total aerobic bacterial count on the surface of the carcass by up to 1 log CFU per square centimeter due to the redistribution of bacteria from the skin surface to the muscle tissue [19]. The use of antimicrobial washes, such as solutions containing acetic acid, lactic acid, or peroxyacetic acid, is employed in commercial processing facilities to reduce Salmonella load on carcasses. However, these treatments are not approved for use in domestic kitchens and are not recommended for home preparation [20].

Reheat Chicken Kill Bacteria: Thermal Inactivation Kinetics

The thermal inactivation of Salmonella in poultry meat is a function of time and temperature. The D-value, or decimal reduction time, is the time required at a given temperature to reduce the bacterial population by 1 log (90%). For Salmonella in chicken meat, the D-value at 60 degrees Celsius is approximately 3.5 minutes, at 65 degrees Celsius is 1.0 minute, and at 70 degrees Celsius is 0.25 minutes [21]. The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) recommends a minimum internal temperature of 74 degrees Celsius (165 degrees Fahrenheit) for whole chicken and 73 degrees Celsius (163 degrees Fahrenheit) for ground chicken products. At 74 degrees Celsius, a 7-log reduction in Salmonella is achieved, which is the standard for commercial pasteurization [22].

The question of whether reheating chicken kills bacteria is answered by the principle of thermal inactivation. Reheating previously cooked chicken to an internal temperature of 74 degrees Celsius will eliminate any Salmonella that may have survived the initial cooking or that may have been introduced through post-cooking contamination. However, the risk of post-cooking contamination is significant. Salmonella can be transferred from raw chicken to cooked chicken through the use of the same cutting board or utensils without intermediate washing [23]. The survival of Salmonella on cooked chicken held at room temperature for extended periods is a function of the water activity of the meat. Cooked chicken with a water activity above 0.95 supports the growth of Salmonella if the temperature is maintained between 7 degrees Celsius and 50 degrees Celsius for more than 4 hours [24].

Pathogenesis and Cellular Interactions

Salmonella is an intracellular pathogen that invades the intestinal epithelium through a mechanism mediated by the type III secretion system (T3SS) encoded on the Salmonella pathogenicity island 1 (SPI-1) [25]. The T3SS injects effector proteins, including SipA, SipC, and SopB, into the host enterocyte, inducing cytoskeletal rearrangement and membrane ruffling that facilitates bacterial uptake [26]. Once internalized, Salmonella resides within a Salmonella-containing vacuole (SCV) and expresses a second T3SS encoded on SPI-2, which is required for intracellular survival and replication [27]. The ability of Salmonella to survive within macrophages and dendritic cells is a key factor in its systemic dissemination from the gastrointestinal tract to the liver, spleen, and mesenteric lymph nodes [28].

In poultry, the pathogenesis of Salmonella infection is serovar-dependent. Non-typhoidal serovars such as S. Enteritidis and S. Typhimurium colonize the ceca and the oviduct in laying hens without causing overt clinical disease, but they can contaminate eggs through transovarian transmission [29]. The presence of S. Enteritidis in the albumen of eggs is a direct result of the bacterium's ability to invade the reproductive tract and colonize the ovarian follicles [30]. The contamination of egg contents is a critical food safety concern because the consumption of raw or undercooked eggs is a major source of human salmonellosis.

Clinical Signs in Poultry

The clinical presentation of Salmonella infection in poultry is highly variable and depends on the serovar, the age of the bird, and the immune status of the flock. In young chicks, infection with S. Typhimurium or S. Enteritidis can cause acute enteritis characterized by diarrhea, dehydration, lethargy, and increased mortality [31]. In older birds, infection is often subclinical, with no overt signs of disease, but with persistent shedding of Salmonella in the feces [32]. The detection of subclinical carriers is a major challenge in the control of Salmonella in commercial flocks because these birds serve as a reservoir for the contamination of the environment and the processing plant.

Diagnostics

The diagnosis of Salmonella in poultry relies on a combination of culture-based methods, serological assays, and molecular techniques. The gold standard for the isolation of Salmonella from poultry samples is the use of selective enrichment media, such as Rappaport-Vassiliadis broth or tetrathionate broth, followed by plating on selective agar, such as xylose lysine deoxycholate (XLD) agar or brilliant green agar [33]. Presumptive colonies are confirmed by biochemical testing using triple sugar iron agar and lysine iron agar, and serotyping is performed using commercial antisera for O and H antigens [34].

Molecular diagnostics have largely replaced traditional serotyping for the identification of Salmonella serovars in reference laboratories. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays targeting the invA gene, which is conserved across all Salmonella serovars, provide a sensitive and specific method for the detection of Salmonella in poultry samples [35]. Real-time PCR assays can detect as few as 10 CFU per gram of sample after enrichment. The use of pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) and whole genome sequencing (WGS) for the subtyping of Salmonella isolates has become standard in epidemiological investigations to trace the source of contamination in foodborne outbreaks [36].

Treatment and Control

The treatment of Salmonella infection in poultry is complicated by the widespread prevalence of antimicrobial resistance. The use of antibiotics in poultry production for the treatment of clinical salmonellosis is restricted in many jurisdictions to prevent the selection of resistant strains that could be transmitted to humans through the food chain [37]. In the European Union, the use of antibiotics as growth promoters has been banned since 2006, and the use of critically important antibiotics for human medicine, such as fluoroquinolones and third-generation cephalosporins, is restricted in poultry [38]. The control of Salmonella in poultry flocks is primarily achieved through biosecurity measures, including the use of Salmonella-free feed, the chlorination of drinking water, the implementation of all-in-all-out production systems, and the vaccination of breeder flocks with live or killed Salmonella vaccines [39].

The following table summarizes the key control measures for Salmonella in poultry production.

| Control Measure | Mechanism | Efficacy | |, - |, - |, - | | Competitive exclusion | Administration of defined bacterial cultures to day-old chicks to colonize the ceca and exclude Salmonella | 2-3 log reduction in cecal colonization | | Vaccination | Live attenuated or killed vaccines administered to breeder flocks to reduce egg contamination | 50-80% reduction in egg contamination | | Feed acidification | Addition of organic acids (formic acid, propionic acid) to feed to reduce pH and inhibit Salmonella growth | 1-2 log reduction in feed contamination | | Litter management | Removal of wet litter and application of hydrated lime to reduce bacterial load in the environment | Variable, dependent on litter moisture |

The following Mermaid diagram illustrates the decision tree for the management of a Salmonella-positive broiler flock at the processing plant.

flowchart TD
    A[Salmonella-positive flock detected at pre-harvest], > B{Is the flock destined for further processing?}
    B, >|Yes| C[Apply antimicrobial wash to carcasses]
    B, >|No| D[Divert to cooked product line]
    C, > E[Test post-wash carcass for Salmonella]
    E, > F{Salmonella detected?}
    F, >|Yes| G[Re-apply wash or divert to cooking]
    F, >|No| H[Release for fresh retail]
    D, > I[Cook to internal temperature 74°C]
    I, > J[Test cooked product for Salmonella]
    J, > K{Salmonella detected?}
    K, >|Yes| L[Re-cook or discard]
    K, >|No| M[Release for retail]

Food Safety and Regulatory Aspects

The regulatory framework for Salmonella in poultry is based on the principle of hazard analysis and critical control points (HACCP). In the United States, the FSIS has established performance standards for Salmonella in broiler carcasses, which require that no more than 5% of samples test positive for Salmonella in a given sampling period [40]. In the European Union, the regulation on the control of Salmonella in poultry (Regulation (EC) No 2160/2003) requires member states to implement national control programs for Salmonella in breeding flocks, laying hens, and broilers [41]. The reduction in Salmonella prevalence in poultry has been associated with a corresponding decrease in the incidence of human salmonellosis in both the United States and the European Union [42].

Conclusion

Salmonella remains a significant foodborne pathogen in poultry production, with particular risks for infants due to their increased susceptibility to infection and the severity of clinical disease. The practice of washing raw chicken is a risk factor for cross-contamination in the domestic kitchen, and the thermal inactivation of Salmonella through proper cooking and reheating to an internal temperature of 74 degrees Celsius is the primary means of ensuring food safety. The control of Salmonella in poultry requires a comprehensive approach that includes biosecurity, vaccination, and antimicrobial interventions at the processing plant.

References

[1] Grimont PAD, Weill FX. Antigenic formulae of the Salmonella serovars. WHO Collaborating Centre for Reference and Research on Salmonella. 2007.

[2] Foley SL, Lynne AM. Food animal-associated Salmonella challenges: pathogenicity and antimicrobial resistance. Journal of Animal Science. 2008;86(6):E173-E187.

[3] Gantois I, Ducatelle R, Pasmans F, et al. Mechanisms of egg contamination by Salmonella Enteritidis. FEMS Microbiology Reviews. 2009;33(4):718-738.

[4] Barrow PA, Freitas Neto OC. Pullorum disease and fowl typhoid in chickens: a review of the history, epidemiology, and control. Avian Pathology. 2011;40(5):441-455.

[5] Gast RK. Salmonella infections. In: Swayne DE, editor. Diseases of Poultry. 14th ed. Wiley-Blackwell; 2020.

[6] European Food Safety Authority. The European Union summary report on trends and sources of zoonoses, zoonotic agents and food-borne outbreaks in 2017. EFSA Journal. 2018;16(12):5500.

[7] Food Safety and Inspection Service. Salmonella verification sampling program: raw chicken parts. USDA FSIS. 2020.

[8] Steenackers H, Hermans K, Vanderleyden J, et al. Salmonella biofilms: an overview on occurrence, structure, and function. Food Research International. 2012;45(2):502-511.

[9] Jones TF, Ingram LA, Fullerton KE, et al. A case-control study of the epidemiology of sporadic Salmonella infection in infants. Pediatrics. 2006;118(6):2380-2387.

[10] Blaser MJ, Newman LS. A review of human salmonellosis: I. Infective dose. Reviews of Infectious Diseases. 1982;4(6):1096-1106.

[11] Crump JA, Luby SP, Mintz ED. The global burden of typhoid fever. Bulletin of the World Health Organization. 2004;82(5):346-353.

[12] Mead PS, Slutsker L, Dietz V, et al. Food-related illness and death in the United States. Emerging Infectious Diseases. 1999;5(5):607-625.

[13] Kase JA, Zhang G, Chen Y. Recent foodborne outbreaks in the United States linked to atypical vehicles. Foodborne Pathogens and Disease. 2017;14(5):249-258.

[14] Jones TF, Ingram LA, Fullerton KE, et al. A case-control study of the epidemiology of sporadic Salmonella infection in infants. Pediatrics. 2006;118(6):2380-2387.

[15] Kennedy J, Jackson V, Blair IS, et al. Food safety knowledge of consumers and the microbiological and temperature status of home-prepared refrigerated meals. Journal of Food Protection. 2005;68(10):2101-2107.

[16] Cogan TA, Bloomfield SF, Humphrey TJ. The effectiveness of hygiene procedures for prevention of cross-contamination from chicken carcasses in the domestic kitchen. Letters in Applied Microbiology. 1999;29(5):354-358.

[17] De Cesare A, Sheldon BW, Smith JL, et al. Survival and persistence of Campylobacter and Salmonella on kitchen surfaces. Journal of Food Protection. 2003;66(12):2264-2270.

[18] Li H, Wang H, D'Aoust JY, et al. Salmonella attachment to poultry skin and meat. Journal of Food Protection. 1993;56(10):872-877.

[19] Northcutt JK, Smith DP, Young LL, et al. Effect of washing on the microbiological quality of broiler carcasses. Poultry Science. 2003;82(6):1003-1007.

[20] Keener KM, Bashor MP, Curtis PA, et al. Comparison of the effectiveness of various antimicrobial treatments on the reduction of Salmonella on broiler carcasses. Journal of Food Protection. 2004;67(9):1872-1877.

[21] Juneja VK, Eblen BS, Marks HM. Thermal inactivation of Salmonella in chicken meat. Journal of Food Science. 2001;66(8):1125-1130.

[22] United States Department of Agriculture. Safe minimum internal temperature chart. USDA Food Safety and Inspection Service. 2020.

[23] Gorman BM, Sofos JN, Morgan JB, et al. Cross-contamination of cooked chicken with Salmonella from raw chicken. Journal of Food Protection. 1995;58(5):512-516.

[24] Juneja VK, Marmer BS. Growth of Salmonella in cooked chicken at various temperatures. Journal of Food Protection. 1998;61(9):1151-1155.

[25] Galan JE. Salmonella interactions with host cells: type III secretion at work. Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology. 2001;17:53-86.

[26] Zhou D, Chen LM, Hernandez L, et al. A Salmonella inositol polyphosphatase acts in conjunction with other bacterial effectors to promote host cell actin cytoskeleton rearrangements. Molecular Microbiology. 2001;39(2):248-259.

[27] Waterman SR, Holden DW. Functions and effectors of the Salmonella pathogenicity island 2 type III secretion system. Microbes and Infection. 2003;5(6):501-511.

[28] Monack DM, Raupach B, Hromockyj AE, et al. Salmonella typhimurium invasion induces apoptosis in infected macrophages. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 1996;93(18):9833-9838.

[29] Gantois I, Ducatelle R, Pasmans F, et al. Mechanisms of egg contamination by Salmonella Enteritidis. FEMS Microbiology Reviews. 2009;33(4):718-738.

[30] Gast RK, Holt PS. Deposition of Salmonella Enteritidis in the albumen of eggs from experimentally infected laying hens. Avian Diseases. 2000;44(4):899-905.

[31] Barrow PA, Lovell MA. Experimental infection of chickens with Salmonella Enteritidis. Avian Pathology. 1991;20(1):145-153.

[32] Van Immerseel F, De Buck J, Pasmans F, et al. The effect of vaccination with a live attenuated Salmonella vaccine on the shedding of Salmonella in broiler chickens. Avian Pathology. 2004;33(5):507-512.

[33] ISO 6579-1:2017. Microbiology of the food chain: horizontal method for the detection, enumeration and serotyping of Salmonella. International Organization for Standardization. 2017.

[34] Ewing WH. Edwards and Ewing's identification of Enterobacteriaceae. 4th ed. Elsevier; 1986.

[35] Malorny B, Hoorfar J, Bunge C, et al. Multicenter validation of the analytical accuracy of Salmonella PCR. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 2003;41(1):148-153.

[36] Allard MW, Luo Y, Strain E, et al. High resolution subtyping of Salmonella using whole genome sequencing. Foodborne Pathogens and Disease. 2012;9(12):1085-1092.

[37] Aarestrup FM. Association between the consumption of antimicrobial agents in animal husbandry and the occurrence of resistant bacteria in food products. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 2002;34(Supplement 3):S99-S106.

[38] European Commission. Ban on antibiotics as growth promoters in animal feed. Regulation (EC) No 1831/2003.

[39] Barrow PA, Wallis TS. Vaccination against Salmonella in poultry. In: Swayne DE, editor. Diseases of Poultry. 14th ed. Wiley-Blackwell; 2020.

[40] Food Safety and Inspection Service. Salmonella verification sampling program. USDA FSIS. 2016.

[41] European Commission. Regulation (EC) No 2160/2003 on the control of Salmonella and other specified food-borne zoonotic agents. Official Journal of the European Union. 2003.

[42] Scallan E, Hoekstra RM, Angulo FJ, et al. Foodborne illness acquired in the United States: major pathogens. Emerging Infectious Diseases. 2011;17(1):7-15. *** Disclaimer: This article is for educational and informational purposes only. It is not intended to substitute for professional veterinary advice, diagnosis, treatment, or regulatory guidance. Always consult a licensed veterinarian or qualified specialist regarding animal health, disease diagnosis, and therapeutic decisions.