Section: Avian Bacteria

Salmonella in Poultry: Contamination, Food Safety, and Public Health Implications

Etiology and Taxonomy

Salmonella is a genus of Gram-negative, facultatively anaerobic, rod-shaped bacteria within the family Enterobacteriaceae. The species Salmonella enterica is the primary pathogen of concern in poultry, encompassing over 2,600 serovars [1]. S. enterica subspecies enterica includes host-restricted serovars such as S. Gallinarum and S. Pullorum, which cause fowl typhoid and pullorum disease, respectively [2]. Host-adapted serovars like S. Enteritidis and S. Typhimurium exhibit a broad host range and are frequently isolated from poultry, representing a major food safety concern [3, 4]. The bacterium is motile via peritrichous flagella (with exceptions like S. Gallinarum) and possesses a complex lipopolysaccharide (LPS) outer membrane that contributes to its virulence and environmental persistence [5, 6]. Of particular note is the common public query regarding whether does chicken have e coli or salmonella; both pathogens are common contaminants of poultry, but Salmonella is the focus of this review.

Virulence is mediated by a suite of chromosomal and plasmid-borne genes. These include genes encoding flagellar antigens, fimbrial adhesins, and the Type III Secretion Systems (T3SS) encoded on Salmonella Pathogenicity Islands (SPIs) 1 and 2 [7, 8]. The presence of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) genes, often carried on mobile genetic elements such as integrons and plasmids, is an escalating concern [9, 10]. Genes encoding extended-spectrum beta-lactamases (ESBLs) like blaCTX-M are increasingly reported in poultry isolates, driven by horizontal transfer [10]. Furthermore, colistin resistance mediated by the mcr gene has been identified in avian-adapted serovars, posing a significant therapeutic challenge [11, 12].

Epidemiology and Contamination Routes

Salmonella is ubiquitous in poultry production environments, with prevalence varying widely by geography, production system, and biosecurity level [13, 14]. Commercial broiler and layer flocks are frequently colonized subclinically, leading to contamination of carcasses at slaughter. The primary sources of introduction into a flock include contaminated feed, water, litter, and vertical transmission through infected breeder flocks. Rodents and other wildlife serve as important reservoirs and mechanical vectors, capable of sustaining infection cycles within poultry houses [15].

Once introduced, Salmonella can spread rapidly within a flock via the fecal-oral route. The pathogen adheres to and invades the intestinal epithelium, establishing a persistent carrier state in many birds [16, 8]. The presence of the bacteria on raw chicken breast bacteria is a direct consequence of fecal contamination during slaughter and processing. The frequently searched term chicken bacteria news often highlights large-scale recalls due to multi-drug resistant serovars like S. Infantis and S. Kentucky [4, 12]. One Health genomic analyses have demonstrated niche-specific lineage replacement, where certain clones of S. Enteritidis become dominant in specific production sectors, suggesting adaptation to farm management practices [3]. The contamination of retail meat is well-documented, with cross-contamination during handling being a primary risk for consumers [10, 1].

Clinical Signs in Poultry

Clinical manifestations of salmonellosis in poultry are highly dependent on serovar, host age, immune status, and infectious dose. Two classic disease syndromes are pullorum disease (caused by S. Pullorum) and fowl typhoid (caused by S. Gallinarum) [2]. These are systemic, often fatal infections in young birds, presenting with depression, huddling, anorexia, white diarrhea, and high mortality. In adult birds, infection is often chronic and subclinical, characterized by decreased egg production, fertility, and hatchability.

Infection with broad-host-range serovars like S. Enteritidis and S. Typhimurium is typically asymptomatic in adult chickens, though it can cause mild enteritis in young poults. Single-cell transcriptomic studies have revealed that S. Enteritidis infection triggers the expansion of innate-like cytotoxic intraepithelial lymphocytes in the gut, a key mechanism in the host's attempt to control the infection [16]. The host immune response is further characterized by cell-type-specific transcriptomic shifts in the spleen, particularly in macrophages and dendritic cells [8]. Chronic infection can result in ovarian localization, leading to the production of internally contaminated eggs, a critical food safety issue.

Pathology

The pathological findings associated with salmonellosis are serovar-specific. In acute pullorum disease and fowl typhoid, gross lesions include an enlarged, congested liver and spleen, necrotic foci in the liver, myocardium, and pancreas, and a caseous cecal core [2]. A key diagnostic lesion is the presence of caseous exudate in the lungs and air sacs. Histologically, there is a marked heterophilic inflammation with fibrinoid necrosis and bacterial emboli in the liver and spleen.

In birds persistently infected with S. Enteritidis, pathological changes may be absent or minimal. Chronic lesions can include oophoritis and peritonitis, with misshapen and discolored ovarian follicles. The bacterium's ability to form biofilms is a critical aspect of its pathogenesis, as it facilitates persistence on equipment and in the host. The formation of biofilms is regulated by complex networks, including the EnvZ/OmpR two-component system and the LuxS/AI-2 quorum sensing system, which activate pathways like SoxR-AcrAB-TolC, thereby enhancing drug tolerance and colonization [17, 7, 6].

Diagnostics

Accurate and timely diagnostics are the cornerstone of Salmonella control. Detection methods in poultry range from traditional culture to rapid molecular and immunological assays. A common question among consumers is whether freezing chicken kill bacteria; it does not. Freezing only halts bacterial growth, and viable pathogens remain present upon thawing. Therefore, detection of viable organisms is critical.

Conventional Culture. The gold standard remains the isolation of Salmonella from fecal samples, cloacal swabs, carcass rinsates, or environmental samples using selective enrichment media (e.g., Rappaport-Vassiliadis broth) followed by plating on selective agars (e.g., XLD, brilliant green agar). This method is labor-intensive and can take three to five days for definitive identification.

Immunological Methods. Commercial ELISA kits targeting Salmonella antigens, such as the Sptp protein, have been developed for serological screening of flocks, providing a high-throughput, cost-effective monitoring tool [5]. Immunomagnetic separation (IMS) using antibody-coated magnetic beads allows for pathogen concentration from complex matrices like chicken carcass rinsate prior to downstream detection [18].

Molecular Diagnostics.

  • Real-Time PCR (qPCR). This method offers high sensitivity and specificity for the detection of Salmonella DNA. Propidium monoazide (PMAxx) coupled with qPCR can differentiate viable cells from membrane-compromised (dead) cells, addressing a major limitation of molecular testing in processed food products [19].
  • Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification (LAMP). LAMP assays are used for rapid, same-day detection. When combined with IMS and whole-genome amplification, they can detect Salmonella in carcass rinsate without a prior culture step [18].
  • Recombinase Polymerase Amplification (RPA) and CRISPR-Cas. These cutting-edge isothermal methods offer rapid, multiplexed detection of nucleic acid markers, enabling field-deployable diagnostics with high specificity [20].
  • Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS). High-throughput sequencing is increasingly used for subtyping, outbreak investigations, and AMR surveillance. Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) provides unmatched resolution for serovar attribution. Targeted amplicon sequencing, such as the Nanopore-based NanoPop approach, can resolve mixed serovar populations within a single sample by sequencing virulence genes and analyzing k-mer profiles, overcoming the high error rates historically associated with this platform [21].

The following decision tree summarizes the diagnostic workflow for a poultry sample:

flowchart TD
    A[Sample: Cloacal swab, cecal content, carcass rinse, egg], > B{Screening Method}
    B, >|Direct| C[Immunomagnetic Separation]
    B, >|Direct| D[DNA Extraction]
    C, > E[Enrichment in Selenite / RV broth]
    E, > F[Selective Plating: XLD, BG agar]
    F, > G[Biochemical & Serological Confirmation]
    
    D, > H[PCR / qPCR / RPA-CRISPR]
    H, > I[Serovar-specific detection]
    D, > J[WGS / Targeted Amplicon Sequencing]
    J, > K[Serotyping, MLST, AMR gene profiling]

    G, > J
    I, > L[Report: Positive / Negative]
    K, > L

Treatment and Antimicrobial Resistance

The treatment of clinical salmonellosis in poultry is complicated by the increasing prevalence of multi-drug resistant (MDR) and extensively drug-resistant (XDR) strains [9, 4]. While antibiotics are sometimes used therapeutically in layer and breeder flocks, they are generally prohibited or heavily regulated in broilers for food safety reasons. The presence of chicken without salmonella cannot be guaranteed by antibiotic use; antimicrobials may actually exacerbate the issue by selecting for resistant populations.

Resistance profiles are alarming. In South Korea, a temporal trend analysis of livestock isolates (2019-2024) demonstrated increasing resistance to third-generation cephalosporins and fluoroquinolones, along with the emergence of plasmid-mediated colistin resistance (mcr) [4]. Similarly, class 1 integrons carrying multiple resistance gene cassettes have been identified in XDR strains from hatchery environments [9]. The plasmid-mediated spread of these genes is a critical concern [10]. The pervasive issue of chicken bacteria news repeatedly underscores the link between agricultural antibiotic use and the spread of unprescribable infections.

Given the limitations of antibiotics, alternative therapies are under intensive investigation. These include:

  • Bacteriophages. Lytic bacteriophages with broad host specificity have demonstrated significant efficacy against MDR S. Typhimurium and S. Enteritidis in both in vitro and in vivo poultry models [22, 23]. Phage cocktails can be applied via drinking water or spray to reduce cecal colonization. Combining phages with essential oils has also shown promise for environmental decontamination [24].
  • Essential Oils and Nanoparticles. Compounds like carvacrol and thymol have antimicrobial effects against Salmonella in poultry feed, though their impact on carcass characteristics is a consideration [25]. Chitosan-based nanoparticles containing antimicrobial peptides (lasso peptides) exhibit enhanced antibacterial activity and have shown effectiveness as a preservative coating for eggs and chilled chicken meat [26].
  • Probiotics and Competitive Exclusion. Bacillus velezensis strains can inhibit Salmonella growth through the production of antimicrobial compounds and by improving host intestinal barrier function [27].
  • Vaccines. Novel vaccination strategies include inactivated vaccines using whole-cell preparations, subunit vaccines, and live attenuated strains. An innovative approach involves an aptamer-based S. Enteritidis vaccine delivered intradermally, which successfully elicited local leukocyte recruitment and mucosal immunity in broiler chickens [28]. An oral plasmid-based vaccine encoding viral epitopes in an attenuated Salmonella vector has also been developed, highlighting the versatility of Salmonella for vectored vaccine delivery [29].
  • Antibody-Based Strategies. Egg yolk immunoglobulins (IgY) conjugated with polymyxin B (nanocombinations) have demonstrated efficacy against colistin-resistant S. Typhimurium, providing a potential food safety intervention [11].

Control Strategies and Food Safety

Control of Salmonella in poultry is a multi-hazard approach requiring strict biosecurity, hygiene, and processing interventions. A key concern for consumers is chicken breast salmonella meme culture, which, while humorous, reflects the serious and well-known risk associated with undercooked poultry. The freezing chicken kill bacteria question is a semantic one: freezing does not kill, only cryopreserves. Therefore, proper cooking remains the only fail-safe step.

Pre-Harvest Control.

  • Biosecurity: Strict all-in/all-out production, rodent control, and sanitation of water systems are fundamental [30, 15]. Seroprevalence surveys on commercial farms reveal significant variability, highlighting gaps in existing biosecurity programs [30].
  • Feed and Water Interventions: Acidification of drinking water with organic acids can reduce Salmonella shedding. Feed can be heat-treated or supplemented with probiotics and essential oils [27, 25].
  • Vaccination: Live and killed vaccines are available for breeder flocks to reduce vertical transmission and improve maternal antibody transfer [28].

Harvest and Post-Harvest Control.

  • Process Hygiene: Preventing fecal contamination during defeathering and evisceration is critical. Washing carcasses with antimicrobial solutions (e.g., chlorine dioxide, peroxyacetic acid) can reduce bacterial load [6]. The response of different serovars to these interventions can vary significantly, as shown by differential susceptibility of S. Typhimurium, S. Enteritidis, and S. Infantis to chlorine dioxide [6].
  • Carcass Chilling: Immersion chilling in antimicrobial-treated water is standard practice to rapidly lower carcass temperature and reduce bacterial growth.
  • Consumer Handling: Education on proper cooking temperatures (minimum internal temperature of 73.9 degC or 165 degF) and prevention of cross-contamination is essential. The risk of undercooked chicken e coli and salmonellosis is a primary driver of foodborne illness. The common query does chicken have e coli or salmonella is justifiably frequent, as raw poultry is a primary vehicle for both. The two pathogens are often co-detected in poultry and share similar contamination routes [31].

Public Health Implications

The public health implications of Salmonella in poultry are profound. Salmonellosis is one of the most common foodborne zoonoses worldwide, with poultry and poultry products being the leading source of human infection. The consumption of raw chicken breast bacteria can lead to self-limiting gastroenteritis in healthy adults but can cause severe, invasive disease in the young, elderly, and immunocompromised. The volume of chicken bacteria news continuously reinforces the need for vigilant monitoring.

The emergence of MDR and XDR strains is the most pressing concern. Infections caused by cephalosporin-resistant or fluoroquinolone-resistant Salmonella are associated with poorer clinical outcomes, longer hospital stays, and increased mortality [9, 11, 4, 1]. The One Health framework is critical to understanding this problem; the use of antibiotics in poultry selects for resistant bacteria and resistance genes that can then be transmitted to humans via the food chain or environmental pathways [3, 12]. The concept of chicken without salmonella is an aspirational goal that requires a paradigm shift in production, from reliance on end-point testing to integrated, systems-based control from hatchery to fork.

Conclusion

Salmonella remains the most significant bacterial pathogen in the context of poultry food safety. Its ability to colonize poultry asymptomatically, its remarkable genomic plasticity leading to the accumulation of virulence and resistance genes, and its resilience in the food chain make it a formidable challenge. Advances in diagnostic technologies, including rapid molecular methods and high-throughput sequencing, are providing unprecedented detail into its biology and epidemiology. Future control strategies must move beyond narrow interventions toward a comprehensive, farm-to-fork, One Health approach that integrates biosecurity, vaccination, non-antibiotic therapies, and stringent processing controls to mitigate the public health burden of this pathogen.

References

[1] Pelyuntha W, Yamik DY, Khongkhai H et al. Serovar Distribution, Virulence Gene Profiles, and Antimicrobial Resistance of Salmonella Isolated from Chicken Meat from the Broiler Slaughterhouse and Processing Plant in Central Thailand. Foodborne Pathog Dis. 2026. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42184212/

[2] Kingshuk MMR, Alam SB, Rahman MS et al. The Landscape of Salmonella enterica Serovar Gallinarum-Pullorum Antimicrobial Resistance in Bangladesh's Poultry Industry: A Combined Phenotypic and Molecular Study. Microbiologyopen. 2026. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42271175/

[3] Zhou H, Huang L, Gong J et al. One Health genomics reveals niche-specific lineage replacement in Salmonella Enteritidis. Natl Sci Rev. 2026. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42328512/

[4] Ali MS, Kang HS, Moon BY et al. Temporal trends in Salmonella serovar distribution and antimicrobial resistance profiles, including plasmid-mediated colistin resistance, among livestock-derived isolates in South Korea, 2019-2024. Front Microbiol. 2026. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42254501/

[5] Xie L, Xia Y, Shen R et al. Establishment of an indirect ELISA method for detecting Salmonella infection based on Sptp protein in poultry. J Microbiol Methods. 2026. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42219045/

[6] Castellanos-Huerta I, Lum J, Romero G et al. Differential Responses of Salmonella enterica Typhimurium, S. enteritidis, and S. infantis to Chlorine Dioxide In Vitro: Impacts on Growth and Biofilm Development. Microorganisms. 2026. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42197443/

[7] Liang J, Chen W, Wang C et al. The EnvZ/OmpR two-component regulatory system regulates biofilm formation in Salmonella pullorum via interaction with the LuxS/AI-2 quorum sensing system and activation of the SoxR-AcrAB-TolC pathway. Front Microbiol. 2026. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42305672/

[8] Wang P, Chen R, Ren K et al. Single-cell transcriptomic profiling of the chicken spleen reveals cell-type-specific immune responses to Salmonella infection. Poult Sci. 2026. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42235159/

[9] Eidaroos NH, Khafagy AR, Eldein AE et al. Virulence and Antimicrobial Resistance Gene Profiling of Salmonella Isolated from Dead-in-Shell Eggs and Hatchery Environments with Emphasis on Class 1 Integron Gene Cassette Sequencing in XDR Strains. Microb Pathog. 2026. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42331072/

[10] Sheng H, Suo J, Yan Y et al. Prevalence, plasmid transmission, and chromosomal integration of bla(CTX-M) genes in Salmonella isolated from retail chicken and pork meats in China. Food Res Int. 2026. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42215089/

[11] Mattar EH, Zari AT, El-Fakharany EM et al. The intrinsic potential of IgY-polymyxin B nanocombinations for combating colistin-resistant Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium isolated from ready-to-cook chicken. Poult Sci. 2026. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42284728/

[12] Carrasco Muñoz M, Pérez de Vargas A, Alhebshi M et al. Genomic characterization of mcr-1.1-positive Salmonella Kentucky ST198 from a captive Asian houbara bustard reveals links to broiler poultry in the United Arab Emirates. Front Vet Sci. 2026. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42205805/

[13] Ejike-Okongwu C, Zakari H, Ngene AC et al. Prevalence of Salmonella species in live bird markets and processing environments in Plateau State, Nigeria. BMC Microbiol. 2026. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42298389/

[14] Zhang Z, Suksawat F, Pulsrikarn C et al. Seasonal surveillance of Salmonella prevalence, antimicrobial resistance, and genetic relatedness in chickens from slaughterhouses and retail markets in Northeast Thailand. Vet World. 2026. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42245451/

[15] Huels F, Jacob J. Rodent-borne pathogens as economic and zoonotic health threat to livestock farming: a review. One Health. 2026. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42206021/

[16] Majeed S, Shah BR, Aryal B et al. Single-cell transcriptomic profiling reveals innate-like cytotoxic intraepithelial lymphocyte expansion during Salmonella Enteritidis infection in chickens. Front Immunol. 2026. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42317345/

[17] Alsuwat MA, Shah AA, Ullah S et al. Microbial Biofilm Formation to Mitigate Foodborne Pathogens Strategies and Control Measures. Indian J Microbiol. 2026. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42325454/

[18] Oh H, Kim H, Seo KH. Same-day, culture-independent detection of Salmonella in chicken carcass rinsate and feed using immunomagnetic separation, whole-genome amplification, and loop-mediated isothermal amplification. Int J Food Microbiol. 2026. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42190332/

[19] Pham HT, Nguyen TH, Lam THA et al. Detection of viable and VBNC Salmonella in retail meat using optimized PMAxx real-time PCR. J Microbiol Methods. 2026. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42229763/

[20] Li X, Huang Y, Zhang X et al. Recent advances in rapid multiplex detection of nucleic acid markers using RPA and CRISPR-Cas. Front Microbiol. 2026. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42182021/ *** Disclaimer: This article is for educational and informational purposes only. It is not intended to substitute for professional veterinary advice, diagnosis, treatment, or regulatory guidance. Always consult a licensed veterinarian or qualified specialist regarding animal health, disease diagnosis, and therapeutic decisions.

[21] Ayala-Velastegui D, Mortimer TD, Siceloff AT et al. NanoPop: Nanopore amplicon sequencing of Salmonella virulence genes to characterize complex mixed serovar populations using k-mers to overcome high sequencing error rates. Microb Genom. 2026. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42329233/

[22] Choi Y, Park J, Kang A et al. Synergistic effects of two bacteriophages with distinct infection patterns and broad host specificity against multidrug-resistant Salmonella Typhimurium and their potential applications in the poultry industry. Poult Sci. 2026. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42308735/

[23] Wasam MZ, Sheikh AA, Anjum AA et al. Efficacy of a bacteriophage cocktail in controlling Salmonella Enteritidis infection in broiler chickens. Iran J Microbiol. 2026. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42306515/

[24] Gentile N, Montoro-Dasi L, Marco-Fuertes A et al. Combining bacteriophages and essential oils for the elimination of monophasic Salmonella Typhimurium and evaluation of phage persistence in poultry farm environments. Poult Sci. 2026. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42190466/

[25] Naeem M, Tushar ZH, Raut R et al. Effects of carvacrol- and thymol-based essential oil feed additives on carcass characteristics and breast meat quality of broilers with or without Salmonella challenge. Poult Sci. 2026. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42190465/

[26] Zhang J, Yuan Y, Chen H et al. A chitosan-lasso peptides nanoparticle for enhanced antibacterial activity and fresh-keeping efficacy in eggs and chilled chicken. Curr Res Food Sci. 2026. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42282865/

[27] Liu Y, Chen S, Zhou L et al. Characterization of Bacillus velezensis DY201: Antimicrobial Mechanisms and Intestinal Health Benefits in Broilers. Animals (Basel). 2026. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42278110/

[28] Uribe-Diaz S, Omolewu AI, Santamaria JM et al. Aptamer-based Salmonella enteritidis-inactivated vaccine injected intradermally elicits local leukocyte recruitment and mucosal immunity in broiler chickens. Poult Sci. 2026. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42330764/

[29] Wang M, Gao Y, Zhang Y et al. A novel oral vaccine strategy utilizing a plasmid with CAG promoter-driven alphavirus RdRp for Co-expression of NA epitope and adjuvant in attenuated Salmonella boosts immune responses against H9N2 in mice. Microb Pathog. 2026. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42297223/

[30] Benedict SR, Gallardo RA, Liebross B et al. Biosecurity assessment and seroprevalence of relevant poultry diseases in Saint Kitts commercial poultry premises. Trop Anim Health Prod. 2026. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42207315/

[31] Amorim ABA, Santos ANA, Campelo MM et al. Enterobacteriaceae contamination in raw chicken meat from Amazonas, Brazil: implications for food hygiene. Braz J Biol. 2026. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42233851/

[32] Krüger GI, Oviedo A, Pardo-Esté C et al. Osmotic Stress Adaptation of Poultry-Associated Salmonella Infantis and Its Implications for Food Safety. Foods. 2026. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42279725/

[33] Xu T, Liu Q, Wu Q et al. Comprehensive investigation of Lpt-targeting antimicrobial peptide Thanatin for sterilization and preservation in foods. Food Res Int. 2026. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42270230/

[34] Dai J, Liu C, Zhang J et al. Type VI secretion system immunity protein Tldi1 modulates host inflammatory responses and gut microbiota homeostasis in chickens infected with Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium. Poult Sci. 2026. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42241763/

[35] Elpers L, Schmeisser B, Felgner P et al. Novel pESI-encoded autotransporter adhesin PeaP of epidemic Salmonella strains mediates adhesion, atypical biofilm formation, and poultry colonization. bioRxiv. 2026. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42239287/