Salmonella in Poultry: Pathogenesis, Epidemiology, and Clinical Management in Chickens

Introduction

Salmonella enterica subspecies enterica represents a major bacterial pathogen of poultry worldwide, causing both clinical disease and subclinical colonization that perpetuates foodborne transmission [1, 2, 3]. The question "does all chicken have salmonella" is clinically inaccurate; prevalence varies by flock, serovar, and management system, but colonization is common in commercial poultry [3, 4, 35]. Host-adapted serovars such as Salmonella Gallinarum and Salmonella Pullorum cause systemic disease almost exclusively in avian species, a phenomenon often described as "salmonella chicken only" due to their strict host tropism [5, 6]. In contrast, broad-host-range serovars like Salmonella Enteritidis and Salmonella Typhimurium colonize chickens without necessarily causing illness, yet they represent a significant reservoir for human infection [2, 7, 8]. This article provides an exhaustive review of Salmonella pathogenesis, epidemiology, clinical management, and control in chickens, integrating recent genomic, transcriptomic, and intervention studies.

Etiology and Virulence Mechanisms

Salmonella enterica subspecies enterica comprises over 2,500 serovars, with those most relevant to poultry including Gallinarum, Pullorum, Enteritidis, Typhimurium, Infantis, and Kentucky [1, 5, 7, 9]. Virulence is multifactorial, involving pathogenicity islands (SPI-1 to SPI-5), flagella, fimbriae, and type III secretion systems (T3SS) that mediate host cell invasion and intracellular survival [1, 10, 11]. The EnvZ/OmpR two-component regulatory system controls biofilm formation in Salmonella Pullorum through interaction with the LuxS/AI-2 quorum sensing system and activation of the SoxR-AcrAB-TolC efflux pathway [10]. Biofilm formation is a critical survival strategy on poultry equipment and carcasses, and it is influenced by osmotic stress adaptation, as demonstrated in Salmonella Infantis [12, 13]. The type VI secretion system (T6SS) immunity protein Tldi1 modulates host inflammatory responses and gut microbiota homeostasis during Typhimurium infection in chickens [11]. Additionally, a novel pESI-encoded autotransporter adhesin (PeaP) mediates adhesion, atypical biofilm formation, and poultry colonization in epidemic Salmonella strains [14]. Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) genes, including class 1 integrons and plasmid-mediated colistin resistance (mcr-1.1), are increasingly detected in poultry isolates, complicating therapeutic options [1, 5, 7, 8, 9].

Pathogenesis in Chickens

Salmonella infection in chickens typically begins with oral ingestion of contaminated feed, water, or litter [3, 15]. After passing the proventriculus and gizzard, bacteria adhere to intestinal epithelial cells via fimbriae and invade M cells overlying Peyer's patches [16, 6]. For host-adapted serovars (Gallinarum, Pullorum), the bacteria disseminate via the bloodstream to the liver, spleen, bone marrow, and reproductive tract, causing systemic disease [5, 6]. Single-cell transcriptomic profiling has revealed that Salmonella Enteritidis infection in chickens induces expansion of innate-like cytotoxic intraepithelial lymphocytes (IELs) in the intestine and cell-type-specific immune responses in the spleen [16, 6]. The pathogen also exploits the T6SS to subvert host defenses and alter gut microbiota composition [11]. In paratyphoid infections (e.g., Enteritidis, Typhimurium), colonization is often restricted to the intestinal tract and ceca, with minimal clinical signs in adult birds but potential for vertical transmission via eggs [2, 35]. The question "salmonella chicken baby" reflects the heightened susceptibility of young chicks, in whom even paratyphoid serovars can cause septicemia and high mortality [17, 18]. Salmonella produces endotoxin (lipopolysaccharide) and enterotoxins that contribute to diarrhea and systemic inflammation, addressing "chicken bacteria toxins" [1, 19].

Epidemiology

Salmonella prevalence in poultry varies by region, production system, and season. In live bird markets and processing environments in Nigeria, prevalence rates exceed 30%, with multiple serovars circulating [3]. In Thailand, seasonal surveillance of chickens from slaughterhouses and retail markets showed higher isolation rates during the rainy season and significant genetic relatedness among isolates [4]. In South Korea, temporal trends from 2019 to 2024 revealed shifts in serovar distribution and increasing plasmid-mediated colistin resistance [7]. In Bangladesh, Salmonella Gallinarum-Pullorum isolates from poultry exhibited high levels of AMR, including resistance to critically important antimicrobials [5]. In China, blaCTX-M genes were found in Salmonella from retail chicken and pork, with both plasmid transmission and chromosomal integration documented [8]. One Health genomics has demonstrated niche-specific lineage replacement in Salmonella Enteritidis, with poultry-adapted clones replacing human-associated lineages [2]. Rodents serve as important reservoirs and mechanical vectors for Salmonella transmission on poultry farms [20]. Biosecurity assessments in commercial premises in Saint Kitts identified seroprevalence of Salmonella and other pathogens, underscoring the need for improved management [15]. The question "chicken salmonella uk" relates to the United Kingdom's successful Salmonella control programs, which have reduced prevalence through vaccination and biosecurity; these are discussed in the linked article Salmonella in Poultry: UK-Specific Epidemiology and Control. The FSIS (Food Safety and Inspection Service) in the United States sets performance standards for Salmonella in raw poultry meat, addressing "fsis poultry salmonella" [21, 35].

Clinical Signs

Clinical presentation depends on serovar, age, and immune status. In chicks infected with Salmonella Pullorum (pullorum disease), signs include white diarrhea, pasted vents, depression, and high mortality within the first two weeks of life [5, 6]. Fowl typhoid caused by Salmonella Gallinarum affects older birds and presents with anorexia, fever, diarrhea, and sudden death [5]. Paratyphoid infections (e.g., Enteritidis, Typhimurium) are often subclinical in adult layers and broilers but can cause diarrhea and reduced growth in young birds [17, 18]. The phrase "salmonella chicken baby" accurately describes the severe disease in neonates. In laying hens, reproductive tract infection can lead to egg contamination without overt clinical signs [2, 35].

Pathology

Gross lesions in pullorum disease include unabsorbed yolk sac, caseous cecal cores, and necrotic foci in the liver, spleen, and lungs [5]. Fowl typhoid is characterized by hepatomegaly, splenomegaly, bronze discoloration of the liver, and hemorrhages in the heart and serosal surfaces [5]. Paratyphoid infections may produce mild enteritis, typhlitis, and focal hepatic necrosis [6]. Histologically, there is heterophilic and mononuclear infiltration, with bacterial colonization of macrophages and epithelial cells [16, 6].

Diagnostics

Definitive diagnosis relies on bacterial isolation from feces, cloacal swabs, or tissues using selective media (e.g., XLD, brilliant green agar) followed by serotyping and AMR profiling [1, 3, 35]. Serological screening using indirect ELISA based on the Sptp protein has been developed for detecting Salmonella infection in poultry [22]. Molecular methods include conventional PCR, real-time PCR with PMAxx pretreatment to detect viable but nonculturable (VBNC) cells [23], loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) combined with immunomagnetic separation and whole-genome amplification for same-day detection [34], and nanopore amplicon sequencing of virulence genes to characterize mixed serovar populations [24]. High-throughput sequencing enables genomic epidemiology and AMR gene surveillance [2, 8]. The "poultry quizlet" concept often includes diagnostic algorithms; a representative decision tree is provided below.

graph TD
    A[Clinical signs or routine surveillance], > B{Sampling}
    B, > C[Cloacal swab / feces / carcass rinse]
    B, > D[Egg / feed / environmental sample]
    C, > E[Selective enrichment (e.g., Rappaport-Vassiliadis)]
    D, > E
    E, > F[Plating on XLD / brilliant green agar]
    F, > G[Presumptive colonies: black center (H2S+)]
    G, > H{Confirmatory tests}
    H, > I[Biochemical (API 20E)]
    H, > J[Serotyping (O and H antigens)]
    H, > K[Molecular: PCR / LAMP / sequencing]
    I, > L[Salmonella confirmed]
    J, > L
    K, > L
    L, > M{AMR profiling}
    M, > N[Disc diffusion / MIC]
    M, > O[Genotypic resistance genes]
    N, > P[Treatment decision]
    O, > P
    P, > Q[Therapy or control measures]

Treatment

Antimicrobial therapy is indicated for clinical salmonellosis in poultry, but increasing AMR limits options [1, 5, 7, 8]. Fluoroquinolones, third-generation cephalosporins, and colistin have been used, but resistance genes (e.g., blaCTX-M, mcr-1.1) are prevalent [8, 9]. Alternative strategies include bacteriophage therapy: synergistic phage cocktails with broad host specificity against multidrug-resistant Salmonella Typhimurium [25], phage cocktails controlling Enteritidis in broilers [18], and combined phage-essential oil formulations for environmental persistence [32]. Other novel interventions include IgY-polymyxin B nanocombinations against colistin-resistant Typhimurium [26], chitosan-lasso peptide nanoparticles for antibacterial activity in eggs and chilled chicken [27], and Bacillus velezensis probiotics that improve intestinal health and inhibit Salmonella [28]. Essential oil feed additives containing carvacrol and thymol have shown benefits in carcass characteristics and meat quality under Salmonella challenge [33]. The question "chicken bacteria disease" encompasses these therapeutic approaches. Regarding "chicken bacteria toxins", treatment may also involve supportive care for endotoxemia.

Control and Prevention

Control programs integrate biosecurity, vaccination, feed additives, and hygiene. Vaccination strategies include oral attenuated Salmonella vaccines [29] and intradermal administration of aptamer-based inactivated vaccines that elicit local leukocyte recruitment and mucosal immunity [17]. Biosecurity measures include rodent control [20], cleaning and disinfection of houses and equipment, and all-in/all-out management [15]. Chlorine dioxide treatment differentially affects biofilm formation and growth of Typhimurium, Enteritidis, and Infantis [13]. The question "chicken salmonella washing" refers to consumer practices: washing raw chicken is not recommended because it spreads bacteria to kitchen surfaces. Proper cooking kills Salmonella; the question "cooking chicken kill bacteria" is answered by thermal inactivation at internal temperatures above 74 degrees C. "Does cooked chicken grow bacteria" is relevant to post-cooking contamination; cooked chicken can support bacterial growth if not stored properly. "Reheat chicken kill bacteria" is effective if reheating reaches 74 degrees C, but toxins may remain. "Can you get e coli from chicken" and "chicken e coli or salmonella" highlight that both pathogens are common in raw poultry; Escherichia coli is also a major contaminant [21]. The phrase "pathogens is most common in raw poultry meat" refers to Salmonella, Campylobacter, and E. coli [21, 35]. "Chicken breast bacteria" and "chicken neck bacteria" indicate that all parts can harbor pathogens. "Chicken ka bacteria" is a Hindi phrase for chicken bacteria, often used in food safety education. For comprehensive management, see the linked articles Salmonella in Poultry: Pathogenesis, Epidemiology, and Public Health Implications and Salmonellosis in Poultry: Comprehensive Guide to Salmonella in Chickens.

References

[1] Eidaroos NH, Khafagy AR, Eldein AE, et al. Virulence and Antimicrobial Resistance Gene Profiling of Salmonella Isolated from Dead-in-Shell Eggs and Hatchery Environments with Emphasis on Class 1 Integron Gene Cassette Sequencing in XDR Strains. Microb Pathog. 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42331072/

[2] Zhou H, Huang L, Gong J, et al. One Health genomics reveals niche-specific lineage replacement in Salmonella Enteritidis. Natl Sci Rev. 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42328512/

[3] Ejike-Okongwu C, Zakari H, Ngene AC, et al. Prevalence of Salmonella species in live bird markets and processing environments in Plateau State, Nigeria. BMC Microbiol. 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42298389/

[4] Zhang Z, Suksawat F, Pulsrikarn C, et al. Seasonal surveillance of Salmonella prevalence, antimicrobial resistance, and genetic relatedness in chickens from slaughterhouses and retail markets in Northeast Thailand. Vet World. 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42245451/

[5] Kingshuk MMR, Alam SB, Rahman MS, et al. The Landscape of Salmonella enterica Serovar Gallinarum-Pullorum Antimicrobial Resistance in Bangladesh's Poultry Industry: A Combined Phenotypic and Molecular Study. Microbiologyopen. 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42271175/

[6] Wang P, Chen R, Ren K, et al. Single-cell transcriptomic profiling of the chicken spleen reveals cell-type-specific immune responses to Salmonella infection. Poult Sci. 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42235159/

[7] Ali MS, Kang HS, Moon BY, et al. Temporal trends in Salmonella serovar distribution and antimicrobial resistance profiles, including plasmid-mediated colistin resistance, among livestock-derived isolates in South Korea, 2019-2024. Front Microbiol. 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42254501/

[8] Sheng H, Suo J, Yan Y, et al. Prevalence, plasmid transmission, and chromosomal integration of bla(CTX-M) genes in Salmonella isolated from retail chicken and pork meats in China. Food Res Int. 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42215089/

[9] Carrasco Muñoz M, Pérez de Vargas A, Alhebshi M, et al. Genomic characterization of mcr-1.1-positive Salmonella Kentucky ST198 from a captive Asian houbara bustard reveals links to broiler poultry in the United Arab Emirates. Front Vet Sci. 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42205805/

[10] Liang J, Chen W, Wang C, et al. The EnvZ/OmpR two-component regulatory system regulates biofilm formation in Salmonella pullorum via interaction with the LuxS/AI-2 quorum sensing system and activation of the SoxR-AcrAB-TolC pathway. Front Microbiol. 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42305672/

[11] Dai J, Liu C, Zhang J, et al. Type VI secretion system immunity protein Tldi1 modulates host inflammatory responses and gut microbiota homeostasis in chickens infected with Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium. Poult Sci. 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42241763/

[12] Krüger GI, Oviedo A, Pardo-Esté C, et al. Osmotic Stress Adaptation of Poultry-Associated Salmonella Infantis and Its Implications for Food Safety. Foods. 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42279725/

[13] Castellanos-Huerta I, Lum

[14] Elpers L, Schmeisser B, Felgner P, et al. Novel pESI-encoded autotransporter adhesin PeaP of epidemic Salmonella strains mediates adhesion, atypical biofilm formation, and poultry colonization. bioRxiv. 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42239287/

[15] Benedict SR, Gallardo RA, Liebross B, et al. Biosecurity assessment and seroprevalence of relevant poultry diseases in Saint Kitts commercial poultry premises. Trop Anim Health Prod. 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42207315/

[16] Majeed S, Shah BR, Aryal B, et al. Single-cell transcriptomic profiling reveals innate-like cytotoxic intraepithelial lymphocyte expansion during Salmonella Enteritidis infection in chickens. Front Immunol. 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42317345/

[17] Uribe-Diaz S, Omolewu AI, Santamaria JM, et al. Aptamer-based Salmonella enteritidis-inactivated vaccine injected intradermally elicits local leukocyte recruitment and mucosal immunity in broiler chickens. Poult Sci. 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42330764/

[18] Wasam MZ, Sheikh AA, Anjum AA, et al. Efficacy of a bacteriophage cocktail in controlling Salmonella Enteritidis infection in broiler chickens. Iran J Microbiol. 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42306515/

[19] Alsuwat MA, Shah AA, Ullah S, et al. Microbial Biofilm Formation to Mitigate Foodborne Pathogens Strategies and Control Measures. Indian J Microbiol. 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42325454/

[20] Huels F, Jacob J. Rodent-borne pathogens as economic and zoonotic health threat to livestock farming: a review. One Health. 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42206021/

[21] Amorim ABA, Santos ANA, Campelo MM, et al. Enterobacteriaceae contamination in raw chicken meat from Amazonas, Brazil: implications for food hygiene. Braz J Biol. 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42233851/

[22] Xie L, Xia Y, Shen R, et al. Establishment of an indirect ELISA method for detecting Salmonella infection based on Sptp protein in poultry. J Microbiol Methods. 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42219045/

[23] Pham HT, Nguyen TH, Lam THA, et al. Detection of viable and VBNC Salmonella in retail meat using optimized PMAxx real-time PCR. J Microbiol Methods. 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42229763/

[24] Ayala-Velastegui D, Mortimer TD, Siceloff AT, et al. NanoPop: Nanopore amplicon sequencing of Salmonella virulence genes to characterize complex mixed serovar populations using k-mers to overcome high sequencing error rates. Microb Genom. 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42329233/

[25] Choi Y, Park J, Kang A, et al. Synergistic effects of two bacteriophages with distinct infection patterns and broad host specificity against multidrug-resistant Salmonella Typhimurium and their potential applications in the poultry industry. Poult Sci. 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42308735/

[26] Mattar EH, Zari AT, El-Fakharany EM, et al. The intrinsic potential of IgY-polymyxin B nanocombinations for combating colistin-resistant Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium isolated from ready-to-cook chicken. Poult Sci. 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42284728/

[27] Zhang J, Yuan Y, Chen H, et al. A chitosan-lasso peptides nanoparticle for enhanced antibacterial activity and fresh-keeping efficacy in eggs and chilled chicken. Curr Res Food Sci. 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42282865/

[28] Liu Y, Chen S, Zhou L, et al. Characterization of Bacillus velezensis DY201: Antimicrobial Mechanisms and Intestinal Health Benefits in Broilers. Animals (Basel). 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42278110/

[29] Wang M, Gao Y, Zhang Y, et al. A novel oral vaccine strategy utilizing a plasmid with CAG promoter-driven alphavirus RdRp for Co-expression of NA epitope and adjuvant in attenuated Salmonella boosts immune responses against H9N2 in mice. Microb Pathog. 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42297223/

[30] Ferrandis-Vila M, Mamerow S, Bootsma M, et al. Intestinal colonization of weaner pigs by extended-spectrum-β-lactamase-encoding Escherichia coli classified for differential host-association using a phylogenetics-based approach. Sci Rep. 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42270713/

[31] Xu T, Liu Q, Wu Q, et al. Comprehensive investigation of Lpt-targeting antimicrobial peptide Thanatin for sterilization and preservation in foods. Food Res Int. 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42270230/