Salmonella in Poultry: Comprehensive Guide to Chicken-Associated Bacterial Pathogens
Etiology and Taxonomic Classification
Salmonella enterica subspecies enterica is the primary etiological agent of salmonellosis in poultry. The species is divided into over 2,600 serovars based on the Kauffmann-White scheme, which differentiates strains by somatic (O) and flagellar (H) antigen profiles [1, 26]. In chickens, the most clinically relevant serovars segregate into two pathotypes: the host-restricted serovars Salmonella Gallinarum and Salmonella Pullorum, which cause fowl typhoid and pullorum disease respectively, and the broad-host-range serovars Salmonella Enteritidis and Salmonella Typhimurium, which typically produce subclinical intestinal colonization but pose significant food safety risks [2, 3]. The bacterium is a Gram-negative, facultatively anaerobic, rod-shaped member of the Enterobacteriaceae family. Its cell wall contains lipopolysaccharide (LPS) with endotoxic properties that contribute to the pathogenesis of systemic disease [4]. The emergence of multidrug-resistant (MDR) and extensively drug-resistant (XDR) strains, particularly those harboring plasmid-mediated resistance genes such as mcr-1.1 and bla(CTX-M), has become a major concern in poultry production systems globally [5, 6, 7].
Epidemiology and Prevalence
Salmonella is a ubiquitous pathogen in poultry production environments. The question of "does all chicken have salmonella" is clinically nuanced; prevalence varies widely by geographic region, production system, biosecurity level, and sampling point along the farm-to-fork continuum [8, 9]. In live bird markets and processing environments in Nigeria, prevalence rates have been reported at substantial levels with contamination identified across multiple sampling points [8]. In Thailand, seasonal surveillance of chickens from slaughterhouses and retail markets demonstrated that Salmonella prevalence fluctuates with environmental temperature and humidity [9]. In South Korea, temporal trends in serovar distribution among livestock-derived isolates have shown shifts in dominant serovars and increasing antimicrobial resistance profiles, including the detection of plasmid-mediated colistin resistance [5]. In Northern Algeria, broiler chickens have been found to harbor diverse Salmonella serovars with significant antimicrobial resistance determinants [31]. In China, the prevalence of bla(CTX-M) genes in Salmonella isolated from retail chicken has demonstrated that plasmid transmission and chromosomal integration are key mechanisms driving the dissemination of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) resistance [6]. In Bangladesh, the landscape of Salmonella Gallinarum-Pullorum has been characterized by combined phenotypic and molecular approaches, revealing high levels of resistance to commonly used antibiotics [10]. The pathogen is frequently isolated from "chicken neck bacteria" samples obtained during processing, indicating that skin and feather follicles serve as reservoirs [26]. The question of "salmonella chicken only" reflects the host-restricted nature of certain serovars; S. Gallinarum and S. Pullorum produce disease almost exclusively in Galliformes, whereas S. Enteritidis and S. Typhimurium colonize multiple avian and mammalian species [2, 3].
Pathogenesis and Virulence Mechanisms
Salmonella pathogenesis in the chicken involves a complex cascade of adhesion, invasion, intracellular survival, and systemic dissemination. The bacterium must first overcome the acidic environment of the proventriculus and gizzard before reaching the lower intestinal tract [3]. Adhesion to intestinal epithelial cells is mediated by fimbriae and autotransporter adhesins. A novel pESI-encoded autotransporter adhesin termed PeaP has been characterized in epidemic Salmonella strains; this adhesin mediates adhesion, atypical biofilm formation, and efficient poultry colonization [11]. Following adhesion, the bacterium employs a type III secretion system (T3SS) encoded on Salmonella pathogenicity island 1 (SPI-1) to inject effector proteins into host cells, triggering cytoskeletal rearrangements and bacterial internalization [12]. The type VI secretion system (T3SS is actually T3SS; note that T6SS is a separate system). The type VI secretion system (T6SS) immunity protein Tldi1 has been shown to modulate host inflammatory responses and gut microbiota homeostasis in chickens infected with S. Typhimurium [12].
The EnvZ/OmpR two-component regulatory system plays a critical role in biofilm formation in Salmonella Pullorum. This system regulates biofilm development via interaction with the LuxS/AI-2 quorum sensing system and activation of the SoxR-AcrAB-TolC pathway, which also contributes to multidrug efflux [4]. Biofilm formation is a key survival strategy that allows Salmonella to persist on abiotic surfaces such as processing equipment and transport crates [13]. Osmotic stress adaptation is another critical survival mechanism; poultry-associated S. Infantis strains have demonstrated robust tolerance to osmotic environments encountered during processing and refrigeration, which has implications for food safety [14].
Host-pathogen interactions at the single-cell level have been elucidated through transcriptomic profiling. Single-cell transcriptomic profiling of the chicken spleen has revealed cell-type-specific immune responses to Salmonella infection, including differential activation of T cell subsets and antigen-presenting cells [15, 3]. Innate-like cytotoxic intraepithelial lymphocyte expansion has been documented during S. Enteritidis infection in chickens, representing a novel mechanism of early immune defense [15]. The bacterial pathogen is considered one of the "pathogens is most common in raw poultry meat" along with Campylobacter and E. coli, but its intracellular survival capabilities make it particularly challenging to eliminate.
Clinical Signs and Pathology
Clinical manifestations of salmonellosis in poultry depend on serovar, age of the bird, infectious dose, and immune status. In chicks infected with S. Pullorum (pullorum disease), clinical signs include acute septicemia, weakness, anorexia, white diarrhea, and high mortality during the first two weeks of life [10, 3]. Surviving birds may become chronic carriers with ovarian localization leading to "chicken parasites in eggs" (vertical transmission). S. Gallinarum (fowl typhoid) produces a similar but often more chronic disease in older birds, characterized by depression, reduced feed intake, diarrhea, and mortality rates ranging from 10 to 80 percent [10]. Postmortem lesions in acute cases include hepatomegaly, splenomegaly, necrotic foci in the liver and spleen, and catarrhal enteritis [3].
Infections with S. Enteritidis and S. Typhimurium in broilers and layers are typically subclinical, although severe experimental challenge can produce transient diarrhea and reduced weight gain [16, 35]. The primary clinical significance of these broad-host-range serovars is their ability to colonize the intestinal tract without causing overt disease while being shed in feces, thereby contaminating the environment and carcasses during processing [2, 9]. The presence of "chicken bacteria toxins" such as endotoxin (LPS) and enterotoxins can contribute to foodborne illness in consumers. The question of "chicken e coli or salmonella" differentiation at the clinical level is challenging because both can produce similar enteric signs; however, systemic salmonellosis tends to produce more pronounced septicemic lesions such as hepatic and splenic necrosis [3].
Differential Diagnosis
The term "poultry quizlet" often references differential diagnoses for enteric and septicemic diseases in chickens. For pullorum disease and fowl typhoid, differential diagnoses include avian pathogenic Escherichia coli (APEC) infection ("avian colibacillosis"), Pasteurella multocida infection (fowl cholera), and other septicemic bacterial infections [3]. For subclinical intestinal carriage of S. Enteritidis and S. Typhimurium, differential considerations include other "chicken bacteria disease" agents such as Campylobacter jejuni and Clostridium perfringens. The clinical question of "salmonella chicken baby" (i.e., Salmonella infection in young chicks) must be differentiated from "chicken e coli or salmonella" etiology using culture-based methods, as both can produce septicemia and mortality in neonates [26].
Diagnostic Approaches
Conventional Culture and Isolation
Traditional culture methods remain the gold standard for Salmonella detection in poultry. The USDA Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS) has established standardized protocols for sampling poultry carcasses, including "fsis poultry salmonella" guidelines that specify carcass rinsate collection for Salmonella detection [25, 29]. Quantitative analysis of Salmonella in raw chicken can be performed using most probable number (MPN) methods; a hierarchical Bayesian approach has been developed to estimate MPN concentrations of Salmonella in raw chicken from qualitative data, improving the accuracy of prevalence estimates [30]. The use of quantitative indicator microorganism data (e.g., Enterobacteriaceae counts) has been evaluated to determine if postchill sampling is predictive of Salmonella contamination in ground poultry products [29].
Molecular and Culture-Independent Methods
Rapid molecular diagnostics have transformed Salmonella detection. The detection of viable and viable but nonculturable (VBNC) Salmonella in retail meat has been achieved using optimized PMAxx real-time PCR, which selectively excludes DNA from dead cells while amplifying target sequences from viable organisms [17]. Same-day culture-independent detection of Salmonella in chicken carcass rinsate and feed has been developed using immunomagnetic separation, whole-genome amplification, and loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP), enabling detection within a single work shift [25].
Advanced sequencing technologies now allow for high-resolution characterization of Salmonella populations. Nanopore amplicon sequencing of Salmonella virulence genes, using a technique termed NanoPop, enables the characterization of complex mixed serovar populations by employing k-mer-based approaches to overcome high sequencing error rates inherent to nanopore platforms [18]. Whole-genome sequencing has been applied to characterize strains such as the MDR S. enterica serovar Choleraesuis strain GS-198 isolated from retail chicken meat, revealing the genomic basis of antimicrobial resistance and virulence [27]. One Health genomics approaches have revealed niche-specific lineage replacement in S. Enteritidis, demonstrating host adaptation and evolution at the genomic level [2].
Serological Methods
Indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) have been developed for detecting Salmonella infection in poultry. An indirect ELISA based on the Sptp protein has shown promise for serological screening of flocks, providing a noninvasive method for surveillance [19]. The "poultry quizlet" concept often includes serogrouping using somatic antisera, which remains a standard approach for preliminary serotyping in reference laboratories.
Biofilm and Phenotypic Characterization
Differentiation of Salmonella growth and biofilm development under antimicrobial stress conditions provides diagnostic and epidemiological insights. Differential responses of S. Typhimurium, S. Enteritidis, and S. Infantis to chlorine dioxide have been characterized in vitro, demonstrating serovar-specific impacts on growth kinetics and biofilm formation [13]. The "chicken neck bacteria" niche is particularly relevant for biofilm-associated contamination, as skin folds and feather follicles provide protected microenvironments.
flowchart TD
A[Sample Collection: Carcass Rinsate, Feed, Cloacal Swab, Organ Tissue], > B[Initial Processing]
B, > C1[Conventional Culture: Pre-enrichment in Buffered Peptone Water]
B, > C2[Molecular Direct Detection: PMAxx-qPCR or LAMP]
B, > C3[Immunomagnetic Separation]
C1, > D1[Selective Enrichment: Rappaport-Vassiliadis, Tetrathionate Broth]
C1, > D2[Plating on XLD, BG, or Hektoen Enteric Agar]
D1, > D2
D2, > E1[Biochemical Confirmation: TSI, LIA, Urease]
D2, > E2[Serological Confirmation: Polyvalent and Monovalent O/H Antisera]
E1, > F1[Serotyping: Kauffmann-White Scheme]
E1, > F2[Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing: Disk Diffusion, MIC Determination]
C3, > G1[Whole-Genome Amplification]
G1, > H1[Nanopore Amplicon Sequencing NanoPop or Whole-Genome Sequencing]
H1, > I1[Bioinformatics: k-mer Analysis, MLST, Resistome Profiling]
C2, > J1[Quantitative Assessment: MPN or Direct CFU Calculation]
J1, > K1[Data Integration and Reporting]
F1, > K1
F2, > K1
I1, > K1
Treatment and Antimicrobial Management
Treatment of clinical salmonellosis in poultry relies on antimicrobial therapy, but the emergence of MDR and XDR strains has complicated this approach [1, 5]. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing is critical for guiding therapy. The presence of class 1 integron gene cassettes in XDR strains, particularly those encoding aminoglycoside and beta-lactam resistance, has been documented through sequencing of isolates from hatchery environments and dead-in-shell eggs [1]. The question of "chicken salmonella uk" parallels global concerns about ESBL-producing strains; in the UK and elsewhere, fluoroquinolone and third-generation cephalosporin resistance is increasingly reported. Preharvest antibiotic use has been shown to directly influence the prevalence of antimicrobial resistance in Salmonella species from commercial poultry and swine farms, reinforcing the necessity of judicious antimicrobial stewardship [33].
Alternative and adjunctive therapeutic strategies have been explored. Bacteriophage therapy has emerged as a promising intervention. Synergistic effects of two bacteriophages with distinct infection patterns and broad host specificity have been demonstrated against MDR S. Typhimurium, with potential applications in the poultry industry including biocontrol during processing [20]. A bacteriophage cocktail has shown efficacy in controlling S. Enteritidis infection in broiler chickens [21]. Combining bacteriophages with essential oils has been evaluated for the elimination of monophasic S. Typhimurium, with assessment of phage persistence in poultry farm environments [22].
Organic acids have been demonstrated to impede Salmonella infection of chicken macrophage-like cell lines (HD11) by modulating itaconate gene expression, suggesting a host-directed immunomodulatory mechanism [28]. The intradermal administration of aptamer-based S. Enteritidis inactivated vaccines has been shown to elicit local leukocyte recruitment and mucosal immunity in broiler chickens, representing a vaccine-based treatment approach [23]. Nutritional interventions include bamboo polyphenols, which protect against S. Enteritidis by modulating inflammation, intestinal barrier integrity, and gut microbiota composition [35]. Sybiotics have demonstrated protective effects against S. Typhimurium infection in young broiler chickens [34]. The use of IgY-polymyxin B nanocombinations has been explored for combating colistin-resistant S. Typhimurium isolated from ready-to-cook chicken [24].
Control and Prevention
Biosecurity and Management
Comprehensive biosecurity programs are the foundation of Salmonella control in poultry flocks. These include all-in/all-out production systems, strict hygiene protocols, rodent and insect control, and monitoring of water sources for "salmonella chicken water" contamination. The pathogen can be introduced through contaminated feed, litter, equipment, and personnel [8, 9]. The question of "does all chicken have salmonella" can be answered by stating that while not all chicken is contaminated, the prevalence can be high in flocks with poor biosecurity. The Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS) has established performance standards for Salmonella reduction in poultry products, and the question of "fsis poultry salmonella" guidelines is central to regulatory compliance in the United States.
Processing Interventions
During processing, multiple interventions reduce Salmonella contamination. Carcass washing, chilling, and the application of antimicrobial agents such as chlorine dioxide, peroxyacetic acid, and organic acids are standard [13, 29]. The physical removal of "chicken neck bacteria" via improved evisceration techniques and the application of "food safety in poultry meat: bacterial pathogens, thermal inactivation, and consumer guidelines" (https://knowledge/bacteria/avian-bacteria/poultry-meat-food-safety-cooking-bacteria) are essential. The question of "cooking chicken kill bacteria" should be answered with temperature guidelines: Salmonella is inactivated at internal temperatures of 74 degrees Celsius (165 degrees Fahrenheit) held for at least 15 seconds. The question of "reheat chicken kill bacteria" must affirm that proper reheating to the same internal temperature will eliminate vegetative cells, though heat-stable toxins may remain.
Vaccination
Vaccination programs are employed in layer and breeder flocks to reduce Salmonella shedding and egg contamination. Live attenuated and killed vaccines are available for S. Enteritidis and S. Typhimurium. The aptamer-based intradermal vaccine platform described by Uribe-Diaz et al. represents a novel delivery approach that enhances mucosal immunity [23].
Consumer Education
Consumer handling practices significantly impact food safety. The question of "salmonella chicken washing" has been addressed by food safety authorities: washing raw chicken is not recommended because it can aerosolize bacteria and contaminate kitchen surfaces. The use of separate cutting boards for raw poultry, proper hand hygiene, and cooking to safe internal temperatures are critical. The question of "salmonella chicken baby" reflects the heightened risk of severe salmonellosis in immunocompromised individuals and infants, who should avoid consumption of undercooked poultry and raw eggs. The question of "chicken parasites in eggs" includes the potential for Salmonella Enteritidis to be vertically transmitted into the egg contents, underscoring the importance of proper egg handling and cooking.
Future Directions
Emerging technologies are reshaping Salmonella detection and control. The application of "NanoPop: nanopore amplicon sequencing of salmonella virulence genes to characterize complex mixed serovar populations using k-mers to overcome high sequencing error rates" [18] will enable real-time monitoring of Salmonella populations in flocks. The use of "type VI secretion system immunity protein tldi1 modulates host inflammatory responses and gut microbiota homeostasis in chickens infected with salmonella enterica serovar typhimurium" [12] provides insights into host-pathogen coevolution that can inform vaccine design. The characterization of "novel pESI-encoded autotransporter adhesin peaP of epidemic salmonella strains mediates adhesion, atypical biofilm formation, and poultry colonization" [11] identifies new targets for anti-adhesion therapies. The question of "chicken bacteria toxins" must be addressed through ongoing surveillance of toxin gene carriage in circulating strains.
Conclusion
Salmonella remains a complex and significant pathogen in poultry production. Its classification as one of the primary "pathogens is most common in raw poultry meat" underscores its importance to veterinary medicine and food safety. The differentiation of "chicken e coli or salmonella" requires robust diagnostic approaches, and the detection of "e coli on raw chicken" does not rule out concurrent Salmonella contamination. The questions of "salmonella chicken only" and "does all chicken have salmonella" reflect the nuanced epidemiology of this pathogen, which is influenced by serovar, host species, production practices, and environmental factors. The integration of molecular diagnostics such as "PMAxx real-time PCR for detection of viable and VBNC salmonella in retail meat" [17] and "same-day detection using immunomagnetic separation, whole-genome amplification and LAMP" [25] provides powerful tools for surveillance and control. Antimicrobial stewardship, alternative therapies including bacteriophages and organic acids, and robust biosecurity remain the cornerstones of effective Salmonella management in poultry. The terms "chicken salmonella uk" and "chicken breast bacteria" highlight the global and product-specific nature of contamination risks. The "chicken neck bacteria" database and "reheat chicken kill bacteria" guidelines are essential components of a comprehensive food safety strategy. Continued research into "salmonella chicken baby" risks and "salmonella chicken washing" prevention will further reduce the burden of this pathogen.
References
[1] Eidaroos NH, Khafagy AR, Eldein AE, et al. Virulence and Antimicrobial Resistance Gene Profiling of Salmonella Isolated from Dead-in-Shell Eggs and Hatchery Environments with Emphasis on Class 1 Integron Gene Cassette Sequencing in XDR Strains. Microb Pathog. 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42331072/
[2] Zhou H, Huang L, Gong J, et al. One Health genomics reveals niche-specific lineage replacement in Salmonella Enteritidis. Natl Sci Rev. 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42328512/
[3] Wang P, Chen R, Ren K, et al. Single-cell transcriptomic profiling of the chicken spleen reveals cell-type-specific immune responses to Salmonella infection. Poult Sci. 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42235159/
[4] Liang J, Chen W, Wang C, et al. The EnvZ/OmpR two-component regulatory system regulates biofilm formation in Salmonella pullorum via interaction with the LuxS/AI-2 quorum sensing system and activation of the SoxR-AcrAB-TolC pathway. Front Microbiol. 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42305672/
[5] Ali MS, Kang HS, Moon BY, et al. Temporal trends in Salmonella serovar distribution and antimicrobial resistance profiles, including plasmid-mediated colistin resistance, among livestock-derived isolates in South Korea, 2019-2024. Front Microbiol. 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42254501/
[6] Sheng H, Suo J, Yan Y, et al. Prevalence, plasmid transmission, and chromosomal integration of bla(CTX-M) genes in Salmonella isolated from retail chicken and pork meats in China. Food Res Int. 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42215089/
[7] Carrasco Muñoz M, Pérez de Vargas A, Alhebshi M, et al. Genomic characterization of mcr-1.1-positive Salmonella Kentucky ST198 from a captive Asian houbara bustard reveals links to broiler poultry in the United Arab Emirates. Front Vet Sci. 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42205805/
[8] Ejike-Okongwu C, Zakari H, Ngene AC, et al. Prevalence of Salmonella species in live bird markets and processing environments in Plateau State, Nigeria. BMC Microbiol. 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42298389/
[9] Zhang Z, Suksawat F, Pulsrikarn C, et al. Seasonal surveillance of Salmonella prevalence, antimicrobial resistance, and genetic relatedness in chickens from slaughterhouses and retail markets in Northeast Thailand. Vet World. 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42245451/
[10] Kingshuk MMR, Alam SB, Rahman MS, et al. The Landscape of Salmonella enterica Serovar Gallinarum-Pullorum Antimicrobial Resistance in Bangladesh's Poultry Industry: A Combined Phenotypic and Molecular Study. Microbiologyopen. 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42271175/
[11] Elpers L, Schmeisser B, Felgner P, et al. Novel pESI-encoded autotransporter adhesin PeaP of epidemic Salmonella strains mediates adhesion, atypical biofilm formation, and poultry colonization. bioRxiv. 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42239287/
[12] Dai J, Liu C, Zhang J, et al. Type VI secretion system immunity protein Tldi1 modulates host inflammatory responses and gut microbiota homeostasis in chickens infected with Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium. Poult Sci. 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42241763/
[13] Castellanos-Huerta I, Lum J, Romero G, et al. Differential Responses of Salmonella enterica Typhimurium, S. enteritidis, and S. infantis to Chlorine Dioxide In Vitro: Impacts on Growth and Biofilm Development. Microorganisms. 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42197443/
[14] Krüger GI, Oviedo A, Pardo-Esté C, et al. Osmotic Stress Adaptation of Poultry-Associated Salmonella Infantis and Its Implications for Food Safety. Foods. 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42279725/
[15] Majeed S, Shah BR, Aryal B, et al. Single-cell transcriptomic profiling reveals innate-like cytotoxic intraepithelial lymphocyte expansion during Salmonella Enteritidis infection in chickens. Front Immunol. 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42317345/
[17] Pham HT, Nguyen TH, Lam THA, et al. Detection of viable and VBNC Salmonella in retail meat using optimized PMAxx real-time PCR. J Microbiol Methods. 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42229763/
[18] Ayala-Velastegui D, Mortimer TD, Siceloff AT, et al. NanoPop: Nanopore amplicon sequencing of Salmonella virulence genes to characterize complex mixed serovar populations using k-mers to overcome high sequencing error rates. Microb Genom. 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42329233/
[19] Xie L, Xia Y, Shen R, et al. Establishment of an indirect ELISA method for detecting Salmonella infection based on Sptp protein in poultry. J Microbiol Methods. 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42219045/
[20] Choi Y, Park J, Kang A, et al. Synergistic effects of two bacteriophages with distinct infection patterns and broad host specificity against multidrug-resistant Salmonella Typhimurium and their potential applications in the poultry industry. Poult Sci. 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42308735/
[21] Wasam MZ, Sheikh AA, Anjum AA, et al. Efficacy of a bacteriophage cocktail in controlling Salmonella Enteritidis infection in broiler chickens. Iran J Microbiol. 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42306515/
[22] Gentile N, Montoro-Dasi L, Marco-Fuertes A, et al. Combining bacteriophages and essential oils for the elimination of monophasic Salmonella Typhimurium and evaluation of phage persistence in poultry farm environments. Poult Sci. 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42190466/
[23] Uribe-Diaz S, Omolewu AI, Santamaria JM, et al. Aptamer-based Salmonella enteritidis-inactivated vaccine injected intradermally elicits local leukocyte recruitment and mucosal immunity in broiler chickens. Poult Sci. 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42330764/
[24] Mattar EH, Zari AT, El-Fakharany EM, et al. The intrinsic potential of IgY-polymyxin B nanocombinations for combating colistin-resistant Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium isolated from ready-to-cook chicken. Poult Sci. 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42284728/