Salmonella in Chickens: Clinical Signs, Zoonotic Risks, and Diagnostic Differentiation from Other Enteric Pathogens
Introduction
Salmonellosis in poultry represents a complex disease spectrum caused by multiple serovars of Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica. These infections range from acute systemic disease with high mortality to asymptomatic carrier states that perpetuate environmental contamination and foodborne zoonotic transmission [1, 2, 3]. The genus Salmonella comprises over 2,600 serovars, but only a limited subset is epidemiologically relevant to chickens. These are broadly divided into host-restricted serovars (S. Gallinarum, S. Pullorum) that cause severe systemic disease in poultry, and broad-host-range serovars (S. Enteritidis, S. Typhimurium, S. Infantis, S. Kentucky) that are frequently carried subclinically but pose significant zoonotic hazards through the food chain [4, 5, 68, 96]. Understanding the clinical presentation, zoonotic implications, and accurate laboratory differentiation from other enteric pathogens is critical for effective flock management and public health protection.
Clinical Signs of Salmonella Infections in Chickens
The clinical expression of salmonellosis in chickens depends on the infecting serovar, bird age, immune status, route of exposure, and concurrent infections. Two major clinical syndromes are recognized: the acute septicemic forms caused by host-adapted serovars (fowl typhoid and pullorum disease) and the enteric/subclinical carrier states typically induced by paratyphoid serovars [47, 149].
Fowl Typhoid (Salmonella Gallinarum)
Fowl typhoid, caused by Salmonella enterica serovar Gallinarum biovar Gallinarum, is a septicemic disease affecting chickens of all ages, although mortality is often highest in adult layers and growers [91, 115, 149]. The incubation period following oral inoculation is 3 to 5 days. Clinical signs include acute onset of somnolence, drooping wings, ruffled feathers, anorexia, pyrexia, and a characteristic greenish-yellow diarrhea [91, 101, 117]. Morbidity and mortality can reach 100% in naive flocks [71, 101]. Postmortem findings typically reveal hepatomegaly with a bronze discoloration, splenomegaly, hemorrhagic enteritis, and fibrinous pericarditis [91, 145]. In chronic cases, ovarian regression and peritonitis are observed in laying hens [75, 141].
Pullorum Disease (Salmonella Pullorum)
Pullorum disease, caused by Salmonella enterica serovar Gallinarum biovar Pullorum, primarily affects young chicks under 3 weeks of age [106, 149]. Clinical signs appear within 48 to 72 hours post-hatch and include profound weakness, huddling, anorexia, pasty white diarrhea (chalky vent), labored breathing, and ataxia [99, 106, 118]. Mortality can exceed 80% in the first week [100, 106]. In older birds, subclinical ovarian localization leads to vertical transmission with infected eggs and hatchery outbreaks [6, 106, 149]. S. Pullorum is host-restricted and non-zoonotic, but its control is essential for trade and flock health [7, 46, 77].
Paratyphoid Salmonellosis (S. Enteritidis, S. Typhimurium, S. Infantis, and Others)
Paratyphoid Salmonella serovars are characterized by their broad host range and ability to colonize the chicken intestine without inducing overt clinical signs in many cases [47, 87, 96]. However, under stress or in young birds, clinical outbreaks can occur. Experimental infection with S. Enteritidis in broilers produces lethargy, reduced feed intake, and watery diarrhea, with mortality ranging from 5% to 27% depending on strain and dose [98, 109, 140]. S. Typhimurium infection similarly induces enteritis, typhlitis, and occasional septicemia in chicks, with yellow mucoid droppings [87, 99, 125, 138]. S. Infantis has emerged as a major serovar in many regions, frequently harboring multidrug resistance plasmids (pESI) but causing minimal clinical disease in chickens [8, 55, 65]. S. Kentucky is often isolated from asymptomatic chickens but can cause catarrhal enteritis and weight loss under experimental conditions [48, 72, 125]. Co-infection with immunosuppressive agents such as avian influenza virus (H9N2) markedly exacerbates clinical severity and pathogen shedding [9, 92].
Clinical Signs by Serovar: Comparative Overview
| Serovar/Biovar | Age Predilection | Predominant Clinical Signs | Fecal Character | Mortality |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| S. Gallinarum | All ages | Somnolence, anorexia, pyrexia, ruffled feathers, cyanosis | Greenish-yellow diarrhea | High (up to 100%) [91, 101, 115] |
| S. Pullorum | Chicks < 3 wk | Weakness, huddling, pasty vent, dyspnea | White chalky diarrhea | High (up to 80%) [99, 106, 118] |
| S. Enteritidis | Young chicks / adults | Lethargy, reduced feed intake, mild enteritis | Watery yellow/brown | Low to moderate [93, 98, 109] |
| S. Typhimurium | Chicks / all ages | Enteritis, typhlitis, dehydration | Watery mucoid | Low to moderate [87, 99, 125, 138] |
| S. Infantis | All ages | Usually subclinical; occasional diarrhea | Watery | Very low [8, 55] |
| S. Kentucky | All ages | Often subclinical; mild enteritis | Pasty/watery | Low [48, 72, 125] |
Zoonotic Risks of Chicken-Associated Salmonella
The zoonotic potential of Salmonella from chickens is a major One Health concern. Human salmonellosis is predominantly caused by the broad-host-range serovars, especially S. Enteritidis and S. Typhimurium, which are transmitted through contaminated poultry meat and eggs [2, 10, 3, 65, 80]. S. Infantis has recently emerged as a significant foodborne pathogen globally, often carrying extended-spectrum beta-lactamase and colistin resistance genes [8, 11, 55]. S. Kentucky, while less frequently implicated in human illness, has been associated with multidrug-resistant infections and may carry zoonotic potential [48, 72].
The primary route of human exposure is the consumption of undercooked eggs or meat from infected birds. Additionally, direct contact with infected flocks or contaminated environments can lead to human infection, particularly among poultry workers [12, 13, 64, 90]. The presence of carrier birds that shed Salmonella without clinical signs is a critical obstacle to risk mitigation [47, 86, 96]. Surveillance studies from multiple countries have demonstrated high prevalence of multidrug-resistant Salmonella isolates in chicken carcasses, retail meat, and slaughterhouse environments, underscoring the need for effective on-farm control programs [1, 5, 14, 42, 69, 76, 82, 84]. The host-restricted serovars Gallinarum and Pullorum are not considered zoonotic, but their control is essential for maintaining flock health and minimizing economic losses [7, 46, 89].
Diagnostic Differentiation from Other Enteric Pathogens
Accurate diagnosis of salmonellosis in chickens requires integration of clinical observation, postmortem examination, bacteriological culture, and molecular methods. The clinical signs of Salmonella infection overlap significantly with those of other common enteric and septicemic pathogens, including colibacillosis (Escherichia coli), necrotic enteritis (Clostridium perfringens), coccidiosis (Eimeria spp.), histomoniasis (Histomonas meleagridis), and Necrotic Enteritis in Broiler Chickens: Clostridium perfringens Virulence Factors, Gut Microbiome, and Probiotic Control Strategies [15, 16, 49, 88, 147].
Differential Diagnosis Table: Key Enteric Pathogens in Chickens
| Pathogen / Condition | Common Age Group | Key Clinical Signs | Distinctive Necropsy Findings | Diagnostic Tests |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Salmonella (septicemic) | All ages | Somnolence, diarrhea, cyanosis, high fever | Bronze liver, splenomegaly, fibrinous pericarditis [91, 101] | Culture (XLD, MacConkey), PCR (invA, fimH), agglutination [17, 18, 19] |
| Escherichia coli (colibacillosis) | Young chicks | Airsacculitis, perihepatitis, pericarditis | Fibrinous polyserositis, yolk sac infection [15, 16] | Culture (MacConkey), 16S rRNA sequencing |
| Clostridium perfringens Type A | Broilers 2-5 wk | Sudden death, depression, bloody diarrhea | Focal necrotic enteritis, "Turkish towel" mucosa | Anaerobic culture, ELISA for NetB toxin |
| Eimeria spp. (coccidiosis) | Growing chicks | Bloody/mucoid diarrhea, reduced weight gain | Intestinal mucosal hemorrhages, cecal cores [20] | Fecal oocyst count, histopathology |
| Histomonas meleagridis | Turkeys, chickens | Yellowish diarrhea, depression | Cecal cores, liver necrosis | PCR, histopathology |
Laboratory Diagnostic Approaches
Bacteriological Culture and Serotyping
Traditional isolation of Salmonella from cloacal swabs, feces, or organ samples remains the gold standard [15, 12, 90, 96]. Samples are pre-enriched in buffered peptone water, followed by selective enrichment (e.g., Rappaport-Vassiliadis broth) and plating onto xylose-lysine-deoxycholate (XLD) agar. Suspect colonies are confirmed biochemically and serogrouped using polyvalent O and H antisera [96, 123]. Final serovar determination requires agglutination with specific factor sera or genomic analysis [21, 7, 72].
Molecular Detection and Differentiation
Polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based methods offer higher sensitivity and faster turnaround than culture. The invA gene is a widely used target for genus-level detection, but false negatives may occur due to sequence variation [86, 121]. Serovar-specific PCR assays have been developed for simultaneous detection of S. Enteritidis, S. Pullorum, S. Typhimurium, and S. Infantis using multiplex PCR [19]. For differentiation of S. Pullorum from S. Gallinarum, a fimH-based high-resolution melting (HRM) PCR or a multiplex assay targeting torT and I137_14430 genes provides reliable discrimination [22, 52]. Recombinase polymerase amplification (RPA) combined with lateral flow dipsticks enables rapid on-site detection of S. Pullorum and S. Enteritidis [17]. Loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) targeting single-nucleotide polymorphisms in the group_17537 gene further enhances field diagnostics [18].
Quantitative PCR (qPCR) assays with TaqMan probes allow high-throughput quantification of S. Pullorum in chicken samples [23]. For differentiation of S. enterica subspecies arizonae (subsp. IIIa) from other salmonellae, a subspecies-specific qPCR has been validated. Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) provides a reliable proteomic identification of Salmonella isolates, though it cannot distinguish between closely related serovars in all cases.
Serological Methods
Indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) based on recombinant proteins (e.g., Sptp, SifA) are available for flock-level screening [24, 58]. These assays detect antibodies against Salmonella but cannot differentiate active infection from vaccination or past exposure. The plate agglutination test (PAT) using whole-cell antigens is commonly used for pullorum disease and fowl typhoid surveillance in breeding flocks [118, 145].
Diagnostic Decision Algorithm
The following Mermaid flowchart illustrates a recommended diagnostic workflow for suspected Salmonella infection in chickens:
flowchart TD
A["Clinical signs: depression, diarrhea, mortality"] --> B{Necropsy}
B --> C[Bronze liver, splenomegaly, pericarditis?]
C -->|Yes| D[Collect liver, spleen, cecal contents]
C -->|No| E[Consider other enteric pathogens]
E --> F[Fecal oocyst exam for coccidiosis]
E --> G[Anaerobic culture for Clostridium]
D --> H[Selective enrichment + XLD culture]
H --> I[Biochemical confirmation + MALDI-TOF]
I --> J{Serovar identification}
J --> K[Serogrouping with O/H antisera]
J --> L["Multiplex PCR: invA, sdfI, fliC, etc."]
L --> M[Differentiate Pullorum vs Gallinarum via fimH-HRM or torT PCR]
H --> N[TaqMan qPCR for rapid quantification]
N --> O["'Confirm with serology (ELISA') at flock level"]
K --> P[Report serovar + antimicrobial susceptibility]
Conclusion
Salmonellosis in chickens encompasses a spectrum of diseases from acute septicemic fowl typhoid to subclinical carrier states of paratyphoid serovars. The zoonotic significance of S. Enteritidis, S. Typhimurium, S. Infantis, and S. Kentucky demands rigorous on-farm biosecurity and surveillance programs. Clinical differentiation from other enteric pathogens requires a systematic approach incorporating postmortem examination, bacterial culture, molecular serotyping, and serology. Advances in multiplex PCR, HRM analysis, RPA-LFD, and proteomic identification have improved diagnostic precision and speed. Management strategies must integrate antimicrobial stewardship given the high prevalence of multidrug resistance, and should consider alternatives such as phage therapy, probiotics, and vaccines to reduce Salmonella carriage [4, 25, 26, 9, 27, 28, 29, 30, 53, 57, 63, 66, 70, 75, 88, 104, 120, 139, 148]. Continued genomic surveillance of circulating serovars and resistance determinants is essential for informed control policies [2, 5, 31, 21, 7, 42, 59, 69, 78].
References
[1] Kingshuk MMR, Alam SB, Rahman MS et al. The Landscape of Salmonella enterica Serovar Gallinarum-Pullorum Antimicrobial Resistance in Bangladesh's Poultry Industry: A Combined Phenotypic and Molecular Study. Microbiologyopen. 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42271175/
[2] Liu F, Zhang L, Shen Q et al. Fifty years of chicken-source Salmonella in China: Evolutionary shifts in epidemiology, antimicrobial resistance, and genomic lineages. Poult Sci. 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41621339/
[3] Ayuti SR, Khairullah AR, Al-Arif MA et al. Tackling salmonellosis: A comprehensive exploration of risks factors, impacts, and solutions. Open Vet J. 2024. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39055762/
[4] Dai J, Liu C, Zhang J et al. Type VI secretion system immunity protein Tldi1 modulates host inflammatory responses and gut microbiota homeostasis in chickens infected with Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium. Poult Sci. 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42241763/
[5] Lei S, Huang P, Wu G et al. Genomic epidemiology and antimicrobial resistance dynamics of Salmonella in Jiangxi poultry/pork supply chains. Food Res Int. 2025. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41606856/
[6] Kang X, An H, Wang B et al. Integrated OMICs approach reveals energy metabolism pathway is vital for Salmonella Pullorum survival within the egg white.
[7] Campos IC, Vilela FP, Saraiva MMS et al. Insights into the global genomic features of Salmonella enterica serovar Gallinarum biovars Gallinarum and Pullorum. J Appl Microbiol. 2024. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39165105/
[8] Jeong J, Chae M, Kang M-S et al. Emergence and characteristics of multidrug-resistant Salmonella enterica subspecies enterica serovar Infantis harboring the pESI plasmid in chicken slaughterhouses in South Korea. Microbiol Spectr. 2025. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40454925/
[9] Xie Y, Chen S, Guo D et al. Resveratrol ameliorates Salmonella Typhimurium-induced intestinal inflammation and barrier dysfunction in chickens via COX-2 inhibition. Res Vet Sci. 2025. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40845557/
[10] Wong IT, Ng IC, Cheung DH et al. Genomic epidemiology and antimicrobial resistance of nontyphoidal Salmonella in retail meats in Hong Kong: A comprehensive surveillance study using whole-genome sequencing. Food Res Int. 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41508433/
[11] Liu L, Yi S, Xu X et al. Prevalence and Characteristics of Plasmid-Mediated Fosfomycin Resistance Gene fosA3 among Salmonella Enteritidis Isolates from Retail Chickens and Children with Gastroenteritis in China. Pathogens. 2024. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39339007/
[12] Aga AM, Mulugeta D, Muleta D et al. Antibiotic susceptibility patterns of Salmonella isolates from clinical, food, and environmental sources in Addis Ababa and surrounding towns, Ethiopia. Microbiol Spectr. 2025. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40642986/
[13] Mengistu G, Nuru A, Gelaw B et al. Prevalence, antimicrobial resistance pattern, and associated factors of Salmonella serovars among human-animal interfaces in the Amhara National Regional State, Ethiopia. BMC Infect Dis. 2025. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40442664/
[14] Touglo K, Djeri B, Sina H et al. First detection of resistance genes and virulence factors in Escherichia coli and Salmonella spp in Togo: the case of imported chicken and frozen by-products. BMC Microbiol. 2025. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40457192/
[15] Tan MF, Tan J, Huang JN et al. Bacterial pathogens in Jiangxi poultry (2023-2024): Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance profiles. Poult Sci. 2025. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41077030/
[16] Egide H, Zhang J, Wang L et al. Prevalence of pathogenic bacteria and their antimicrobial patterns analysis of clinical samples from free-range chickens raised in forest farms in Zhouqu county of Gansu Province, China. Poult Sci. 2025. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41037884/
[17] Wang C, Zeng T, Ya H et al. Establishment and application of a dual RPA-LFD rapid detection method for Salmonella Pullorum and Salmonella Enteritidis. PLoS One. 2025. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41259323/
[18] Xu X, Liang Y, Zheng Z et al. An enzyme-activated loop primer probe LAMP method based on a new SNP site in the group_17537 gene for rapid on-site detection of Salmonella Pullorum. Poult Sci. 2025. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39823835/
[19] Liu B, Meng C, Han S et al. Development of a 1-step multiplex PCR assay for the detection of S. Enteritidis, S. Pullorum, S. Typhimurium, and S. Infantis associated with poultry production. Poult Sci. 2024. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39043031/
[20] Pranta AM. Accessible AI-powered poultry disease diagnostics: development, validation, and web deployment of a farmer-friendly MobileNet-based system for coccidiosis and salmonella detection in resource-constrained settings. Poult Sci. 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41478269/
[21] Bu X, Wu Y, Hong Y et al. Comparative genomics analysis of Salmonella Enteritidis isolated from clinical cases associated with chicken. BMC Microbiol. 2024. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39587491/
[22] Zhang D, Zhuang L, Jiang Y et al. Efficient differentiation between Salmonella Pullorum and Salmonella Gallinarum by a fimH-based PCR-HRM. Avian Pathol. 2025. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39764764/
[23] Wang H, Kang X, Yu L et al. Developing a novel TaqMan qPCR assay for optimizing Salmonella Pullorum detection in chickens. Vet Q. 2025. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39882692/
[24] Xie L, Xia Y, Shen R et al. Establishment of an indirect ELISA method for detecting Salmonella infection based on Sptp protein in poultry. J Microbiol Methods. 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42219045/
[25] Zhao H, You S, Fu J et al. Phage therapy: A novel strategy to combat drug-resistant Salmonella Pullorum infection in chickens. Vet Microbiol. 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42061220/
[26] Bakhsh M, Senevirathne A, Riaz J et al. Bivalent Oral Vaccine Using Attenuated Salmonella Gallinarum Delivering HA and NA-M2e Confers Dual Protection Against H9N2 Avian Influenza and Fowl Typhoid in Chickens. Vaccines (Basel). 2025. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40872877/
[27] Bai H, Liao Y, Lu J et al. In vitro antibacterial efficacy of a novel chicken-derived Bacillus subtilis GX15 strain and its protective mechanisms in mice challenged by Salmonella enterica serovar typhymurium. BMC Microbiol. 2025. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40596838/
[28] Ahmad AAM, Hussien EAM, Elian AAAM et al. Nigella sativa monophosphoryl lipid A nanoliposome: a promising antibiotic alternative and immunomodulator to control virulent pandemic drug-resistant Salmonella pullorum infection in broiler chicks. BMC Vet Res. 2025. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40025471/
[29] Joaquim P, Balbiani F, Socas ML et al. Combination of Live and Inactivated Salmonella Vaccines to Protect Against Fowl Typhoid in Laying Hens. Avian Dis. 2024. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39400221/
[30] Nabil NM, Tawakol MM, Samir A et al. Evaluation of lyophilized bacteriophage cocktail efficiency against multidrug-resistant Salmonella in broiler chickens. BMC Microbiol. 2024. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39261757/
[31] Jia C, Huang C, Zhou H et al. Avian-specific Salmonella transition to endemicity is accompanied by localized resistome and mobilome interaction. Elife. 2025. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40035424/
[32] Wibisono FJ, Effendi MH, Tyasningsih W et al. Antibiotic resistance profiles of Escherichia coli and Salmonella spp. isolated from chicken meat sold in traditional markets in Gresik District, East Java, Indonesia. Open Vet J. 2025. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40557094/
[33] Oliveira ES, Arantes LCRV, Vieira de Lima GB et al. An outbreak in week-old broiler chicks caused by a highly virulent and multidrug-resistant strain of Salmonella Gallinarum. Avian Pathol. 2025. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40091670/
[34] Chacón RD, Ramírez M, Suárez-Agüero D et al. Genomic Differences in Antimicrobial Resistance and Virulence Among Key Salmonella Strains of Serogroups B and D1 in Brazilian Poultry. Curr Microbiol. 2025. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40050512/
[35] Khalifa HO, Mohammed T, Mohamed MI et al. In vitro assessment of the synergistic effects of cefotaxime, colistin, and fosfomycin combinations against foodborne resistant Escherichia coli and Salmonella isolates. J Antibiot (Tokyo). 2025. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39910346/
[36] An H, Kang X, Huang C et al. Genomic and virulent characterization of a duck-associated Salmonella serovar Potsdam from China. Poult Sci. 2025. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39693960/
[37] Aganja RP, Kim IS, Tae HJ et al. Expression and delivery of HA1-M2e antigen using an innovative attenuated Salmonella-mediated delivery system confers promising protection against H9N2 avian influenza challenge. Poult Sci. 2025. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39631285/
[38] Mukhtar M, Ghafoor A, McClelland M et al. Construction, molecular characterization, and safety assessment of purB mutant of Salmonella Gallinarum. Front Microbiol. 2024. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39606105/
[39] Mudasir Ahmad S, Saleem A, Nazir J et al. Synthesis and pharmacological evaluation of Andrographolide and Ajwain as promising alternatives to antibiotics for treating Salmonella gallinarum infection in chicken. Int Immunopharmacol. 2024. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39303542/
[40] Al-Shafee AAJ, Abdulwahid MT. Occurrence, antimicrobial resistance, and molecular characterization of Salmonella enterica from chicken products and human in Wasit Governorate of Iraq. Open Vet J. 2024. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38938436/
Disclaimer: This article is for educational and informational purposes only. It is not intended to substitute for professional veterinary advice, diagnosis, treatment, or regulatory guidance. Always consult a licensed veterinarian or qualified specialist regarding animal health, disease diagnosis, and therapeutic decisions.