Fowl Cholera in Poultry: Etiology, Clinical Presentation, Diagnosis, and Control

Etiology

Fowl cholera is a highly contagious septicemic bacterial disease of poultry caused by Pasteurella multocida, a Gram-negative, non-motile, coccobacillus belonging to the family Pasteurellaceae [1, 2]. The organism produces a capsule and exhibits bipolar staining with methylene blue or Giemsa stain [3]. P. multocida is classified into five capsular serogroups (A, B, D, E, F) and 16 lipopolysaccharide (LPS) serotypes based on antigenic differences [4]. In poultry, serogroup A is the most prevalent, although serogroups B and D have been reported in some geographic regions [5, 6]. The bacterium possesses a wide array of virulence factors, including capsule (capA), iron acquisition proteins (exbB, hgbB, fur), fimbriae and adhesins (fim4, fimA, pfhA, tadD), outer membrane proteins (oma87, plpB), sialidases (nanB, nanH), and superoxide dismutases (sodA, sodC) [1, 5]. The presence of these factors enables colonization, immune evasion, and systemic dissemination [27]. Genomic studies have identified phase variation in glycosyltransferase genes (e.g., htpE, gatG, natC) that alter LPS outer core biosynthesis, contributing to antigenic diversity and potential vaccine escape [7]. Multilocus sequence typing (MLST) has revealed multiple sequence types (STs) associated with outbreaks, including ST9, ST20, ST122, ST134, ST366, and ST374 [7, 6, 27].

Epidemiology

Fowl cholera occurs worldwide and affects a wide range of avian species, including chickens, turkeys, ducks, geese, and wild birds [8, 9]. Outbreaks are often associated with wet, cold weather and high-density housing [10]. Transmission occurs via direct contact with infected birds, inhalation of aerosolized bacteria, or ingestion of contaminated feed and water [11]. The bacterium can survive in the environment for weeks, particularly in moist organic material, and is present in chicken feces bacteria, serving as a source of environmental contamination [8]. Carrier birds, which harbor the organism in the upper respiratory tract without clinical signs, are a key reservoir for introduction into naive flocks [4].

The question "does chicken get bacteria" is answered affirmatively: chickens are highly susceptible to P. multocida infection, with morbidity and mortality rates varying by host species, age, and strain virulence [10]. Turkeys are particularly prone to acute disease, while chickens may exhibit more chronic forms [30]. In layer flocks, outbreaks can cause significant drops in egg production and increased mortality [1]. A chicken bacteria outbreak is often explosive: the basic reproduction number (R0) estimated from mathematical models ranges from 2.0 to 5.0 under typical farm conditions [10]. Free-range and backyard flocks are at elevated risk due to increased exposure to wildlife and contaminated soil [7].

Clinical Presentation

The clinical presentation of fowl cholera is categorized into peracute, acute, and chronic forms [4]. In peracute cases, birds are found dead without premonitory signs [12]. Acute cases present with fever, depression, ruffled feathers, mucoid discharge from the mouth, diarrhea, and increased respiratory rate [3, 32]. Mortality can reach 50% or higher in untreated flocks [10]. Chronic infection, which may follow acute disease, is characterized by localized lesions such as swollen wattles, sinuses, and joints (arthritis), as well as conjunctivitis and torticollis [3, 30].

In broilers, acute mortality is the most common presentation, while in layers, a subacute course with decreased egg production and mild respiratory signs may be observed [1]. In waterfowl, the disease can present with sudden death and high mortality [9]. A rare outbreak in backyard turkeys has even documented acute heart rupture secondary to septic embolization from vegetative valvular lesions [30].

Pathology

Gross pathological lesions in acute fowl cholera include multifocal hepatic necrosis (pinpoint pale foci), generalized congestion, petechial hemorrhages on epicardium and serosal surfaces, splenomegaly, pulmonary edema, and ascites [3, 32]. Chronic cases may show caseous exudate in wattles, synovial thickening, and fibrinous pericarditis [3].

Histopathological examination reveals vasculitis, submucosal edema in trachea, multifocal necrosis in liver, desquamation of intestinal villi, and bacterial emboli in multiple organs [3, 30]. The liver typically exhibits coagulative necrosis with a surrounding inflammatory infiltrate of heterophils and macrophages [3].

Diagnosis

Diagnosis of fowl cholera relies on a combination of clinical history, gross pathology, histopathology, and laboratory confirmation [4, 13].

Bacteriological Culture

P. multocida can be isolated from blood, liver, spleen, bone marrow, or tracheal swabs on 5% sheep blood agar or trypticase soy agar, producing small, gray, mucoid colonies after 24-48 hours at 37°C in 5% CO2 [2, 14]. The organism is oxidase- and catalase-positive, and fails to grow on MacConkey agar [4]. Biochemical identification can be performed using commercial kits [14].

Molecular Detection

Conventional polymerase chain reaction (PCR) targeting the capsular gene hyaD/hyaC (for serogroup A) or bcbD (for serogroup B) provides rapid confirmation [2, 5]. Multiplex PCR for capsular serotyping and LPS genotyping is widely used in reference laboratories [1, 6]. Real-time PCR offers higher sensitivity and can detect the organism in mixed samples [4].

Antibiotic Sensitivity Testing

Antibiogram profiling using disk diffusion or broth microdilution (e.g., Sensititre system) is essential due to emerging antimicrobial resistance [1, 2]. Isolates from some regions show high susceptibility to penicillin, ampicillin, norfloxacin, and florfenicol, but resistance to fluoroquinolones and intermediate sensitivity to gentamicin, tetracycline, and sulfonamides has been reported [1, 2, 5]. Multidrug resistance, especially in type B strains, is a growing concern [5, 27].

Predictive Modeling

Advanced data mining and logistic regression models have been developed to predict fowl cholera infection status using variables such as bird age, vaccination history, environmental conditions, and mortality rates [15]. Random Forest algorithms achieved 94.6% accuracy, demonstrating the potential of computational epidemiology for early warning systems [15].

Differential Diagnosis

Fowl cholera must be differentiated from other causes of acute septicemia in poultry, including avian influenza, Newcastle disease, salmonellosis, and avian colibacillosis [13, 29]. Co-infection with viral pathogens (e.g., infectious bronchitis, avian influenza) can complicate diagnosis by altering clinical presentation and antibody response [13, 16].

Treatment

Antimicrobial therapy is most effective when initiated early in the course of disease [4]. Commonly used antibiotics include tetracyclines, sulfonamides, penicillins, and fluoroquinolones, but selection should be guided by sensitivity testing [1, 2]. The question "what kills chicken bacteria" is addressed by antibiotics, but resistance is increasing, necessitating responsible use [5]. In addition to antimicrobials, supportive care includes improving ventilation, reducing stress, and ensuring clean water and feed [10].

Alternative therapeutic strategies include the use of novel multi-strain probiotics containing Lactobacillus plantarum, L. fermentum, Pediococcus acidilactici, Enterococcus faecium, and Saccharomyces cerevisiae which improved growth performance, reduced intestinal P. multocida load, and upregulated anti-inflammatory genes in broilers (HIF1A, TSG-6, PTGER2) [17]. The application of bacteriophage lysates has also been explored but remains experimental [18].

Control

Control of fowl cholera relies on biosecurity, vaccination, and management practices [10, 29]. Biosecurity measures include all-in/all-out production, rodent and wild bird control, cleaning and disinfection of facilities, and quarantine of new birds [10]. A question often arises: "freezing chicken kill bacteria"? While freezing at -20°C reduces viability of P. multocida, it does not reliably sterilize contaminated carcasses; only proper cooking (internal temperature >74°C) eliminates the organism [8].

Vaccination

Vaccination is the cornerstone of fowl cholera control [19, 20]. Both inactivated (bacterin) and live attenuated vaccines are available [21]. Inactivated vaccines, typically oil-adjuvanted or aluminum hydroxide-adsorbed, require multiple doses to induce protective immunity [33]. Gamma-irradiated whole-cell vaccines formulated with adjuvants such as Montanide Gel 01 PR or Emulsigen-D have demonstrated strong humoral (IgG, IgA) and cell-mediated (IFN-γ, IL-6, IL-12) responses, with up to 100% protection against homologous challenge [21, 22]. Intranasal or intraocular administration of gamma-irradiated mucosal vaccines can achieve comparable protection to parenteral injection [22].

Iron-inactivated vaccines prepared from bacteria grown under iron-restricted conditions have also been evaluated, showing enhanced immunogenicity due to upregulation of supernatant proteins such as aspartate ammonia-lyase (AspA), diacylglycerol kinase (DgK), and 30S ribosomal protein S6 (RpsF) [23, 31]. Subunit vaccines based on these proteins induced 66.7-80% protection in chickens [31]. Bivalent vaccines combining fowl cholera and avian influenza antigens are under development to address co-infections [19, 20].

Autogenous vaccines, prepared from farm-specific isolates, are frequently used in free-range systems where multiple sequence types circulate [7]. However, phase variation in LPS genes can reduce vaccine efficacy if the vaccine strain does not match the outbreak strain [7].

Management and Monitoring

Regular monitoring of mortality, clinical signs, and seroconversion (via ELISA) is recommended [33]. A mathematical SEIATCR model suggests that treatment and vaccination are more effective than culling alone in reducing R0 below 1 [10]. Environmental sampling for P. multocida from waterers, feeders, and chicken feces bacteria can help detect contamination early [4].

The term "fowl cholera in hindi" refers to (murgi haiwa), and veterinary authorities in endemic regions advocate for vaccination and biosecurity awareness campaigns [4].

Diagnostic and Control Workflow

The following Mermaid diagram outlines an integrated diagnostic and control approach for fowl cholera outbreaks in poultry.

flowchart TD
    A[Outbreak suspicion: sudden deaths, respiratory signs], > B[Clinical examination & necropsy]
    B, > C{Suspect fowl cholera?}
    C, >|No| D[Differential diagnosis: other septicemic diseases]
    C, >|Yes| E[Sample collection: liver, spleen, tracheal swab]
    E, > F[Bacteriological culture on blood agar]
    F, > G[Gram stain & biochemical tests]
    G, > H[PCR for capsular/LPS typing & virulence genes]
    H, > I[Antibiotic sensitivity testing]
    I, > J[Initiate targeted antimicrobial therapy]
    J, > K[Implement biosecurity measures]
    K, > L{Vaccination strategy?}
    L, >|Autogenous| M[Isolate outbreak strain & prepare bacterin]
    L, >|Commercial| N[Select appropriate serotype-specific vaccine]
    M, > O[Vaccinate remaining flock]
    N, > O
    O, > P[Monitor mortality & serology post-vaccination]
    P, > Q[Evaluate R0 reduction]
    Q, > R[Long-term surveillance & environmental decontamination]

Summary

Fowl cholera remains a major economic threat to poultry production worldwide. Rapid and accurate diagnosis using culture, PCR, and antibiogram profiling is essential for effective treatment and control. Multidrug resistance and antigenic diversity complicate management, necessitating integrated strategies that combine biosecurity, vaccination, and prudent antimicrobial use. Emerging tools such as predictive modeling, gamma-irradiated vaccines, and probiotics offer promising avenues for improved disease control.

References

[1] Arvia, M. M., Kurnia, R., Nugroho, C., et al. Characterization of Pasteurella multocida Isolated from Layer Chickens Infected with Fowl Cholera in Sukabumi, Indonesia: Antibiotic Resistance and Virulence Gene Detection. World's Veterinary Journal, 2025. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b3144a59e73f2871956ec37e6abd7ee7f9f9c405

[2] Geda, A. M., Wendimu, A., Lulie, S., et al. Molecular Detection and Antibiogram Profiling of Pasteurella multocida Isolated From Breeder Chickens Suspected of Fowl Cholera in Gondar City, Ethiopia. International Journal of Microbiology, 2025. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1a445e3c4b0978b12fe38cc963d29ef0942b2caf

[3] Aliza, D., Hasan, D., Nazaruddin, N., et al. Diagnosis of Fowl Cholera in Broiler Chicken Collected from Banda Aceh and Aceh Besar. Jurnal Medika Veterinaria, 2024. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5b05b9102c0406a89cf0a4b9e39037af51f989cc

[4] Geda, A. M. Fowl Cholera in Chickens: Current Trends in Diagnosis and Phenotypic Drug Resistance in Gondar City, Ethiopia. Veterinary Medicine International, 2024. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9e27f2f69cf5400f12c927fb142c9730ae27453c

[5] Saha, O., Islam, M. R., Rahman, M. S., et al. First report from Bangladesh on genetic diversity of multidrug-resistant Pasteurella multocida type B:2 in fowl cholera. Veterinary World, 2021. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ad226a5de4b7a13f30ce421a9e620458e03e1a11

[6] Lai, V. D., Kim, J.-S., Mo, I. Multilocus Sequence Typing of Pasteurella

[7] Omaleki, L., Blackall, P., Cuddihy, T. P., et al. Phase variation in the glycosyltransferase genes of Pasteurella multocida associated with outbreaks of fowl cholera on free-range layer farms. Microbial Genomics, 2022. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/13a4ece8a5d1d8be6e05dd9fce546e76d7c4d317

[8] Petersen, K. D., Christensen, J., Permin, A., et al. Virulence of Pasteurella multocida subsp. multocida isolated from outbreaks of fowl cholera in wild birds for domestic poultry and game birds. Avian Pathology, 2001. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/59d66daff2496c892a5f00ff4b3da1127d048680

[9] Hassan, N., Hamadani, H., Zargar, U. R. Rare Outbreak of Fowl Cholera in Waterfowls in Dal Lake Area of Kashmir, with Isolation, Antibiogram and Successful Treatment - A Report. 2017. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4fcb521fb532d3ecc1318f7a0e0764492887dc3f

[10] Malek, A. Dynamics of cholera transmission in poultry farm: insights from a compartmental model and control strategies. British Poultry Science, 2025. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4e28597f305d1354a25e1d57072f1cca557749ca

[11] Ramesh, P. T. Comparative Evaluation of Biofilm Vaccine with other Conventional Vaccines Against Fowl Cholera in Poultry Layer Birds. 2006. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1ffcee97bcfc7a6989df2e29ab65d86ed54fdcc8

[12] Wickramasinghe, R., Peiris, H. An outbreak of fowl cholera in a poultry farm in Sri Lanka. 1985. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/054588a8dc0c3b2a18b4adea9aac028b1b9c33dc

[13] Ookanti, S. Co-infection of Fowl Cholera with bacterial and viral infection in poultry flocks. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3b1ce0bb4abe36d04b9b280908f7af122a94d165

[14] Isolation and Molecular Identification of Pasteurella multocida from Commercial Poultry Farms Suffering from Fowl Cholera. International Journal of Biology Pharmacy and Allied Sciences, 2019. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f28eeada9fefedf4d3cd97a38609b37a6e90e7f9

[15] Amosa, B. M. G., Onyeka, N.C., Fabiyi, A. O., et al. Development of a Predictive Model for Fowl-Cholera Infection Status in Poultry Using Advanced Data Mining Analysis Techniques and Logistic Regression Modeling. International Journal of Latest Technology in Engineering Management & Applied Science, 2026. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d897f7ed29c171c9bccec003534ad508692fffb5

[16] Hegazy, S., Azzam, A., Gabal, M. A. Interaction of naturally occurring aflatoxins in poultry feed and immunization against fowl cholera. Poultry Science, 1991. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/daa7ebcf4c628c9794ac1c26183d7c638b4b7728

[17] Reuben, R., Sarkar, S., Ibnat, H., et al. Novel multi-strain probiotics reduces Pasteurella multocida induced fowl cholera mortality in broilers. Scientific Reports, 2021. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/912b4ed5a84d0b1da383f86833a6f2c493b91b30

[18] Ramchandran, D., Verma, H., Prajapati, A., et al. Application of bacteriophage lysate for treatment of fowl cholera in poultry. 2012. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/73ac9950100114713fb4b55b8a2ae6df6dc535f0

[19] Rafique, M., Shahzad, A., Jahangir, G., et al. Immunopotential of the Combine Vaccine against Fowl Cholera and Avian Influenza Virus in Poultry. Molecular Genetics Microbiology and Virology, 2025. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ca9806ab35cc83107e0da83a1f2fa958bb9065c2

[20] Ahsan, M., Jalees, M. M., Ashraf, W., et al. IMMUNIZATION POTENCY AND PROTECTIVE EFFICACY OF A BIVALENT INACTIVATED FOWL CHOLERA AND AVIAN INFLUENZA VACCINE IN POULTRY. Journal of Population Therapeutics and Clinical Pharmacology, 2024. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3df66604f8375f43488dc80470b1cabf63993042

[21] Belay, E., Bitew, M., Ibrahim, S. M., et al. Gamma-irradiated fowl cholera vaccines formulated with different adjuvants induced antibody response and cytokine expression in chickens. Frontiers in Immunology, 2025. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2ea1d051381162c2dd3fc5f68fe8150684175426

[22] Dessalegn, B., Bitew, M., Asfaw, D., et al. Gamma-Irradiated Fowl Cholera Mucosal Vaccine: Potential Vaccine Candidate for Safe and Effective Immunization of Chicken Against Fowl Cholera. Frontiers in Immunology, 2021. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e122dcdc61144f22067e3cc9a5b4f6d880f2173e

[23] Abhilash, M., Kannaki, T., Priyanka, E., et al. Immunogenicity and Protective Efficacy of Iron-inactivated Pasteurella multocida A:1 Vaccine against Fowl Cholera in Backyard Chicken. Indian Journal of Animal Research, 2021. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/860968f51c41f1c31fa48ae6c7c158d48eef5561

[24] Tsai, H. J., You, W.-B. Short communication. Occurrence of fowl cholera in poultry flocks in Taiwan. 2000. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1bf9237bfc20abd823077c9996335eefc96f9fb6

[25] Kardos, G., Kiss, I. Molecular Epidemiology Investigation of Outbreaks of Fowl Cholera in Geographically Related Poultry Flocks. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 2005. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c24f37dd808124e1d8e14deae58f0cdd90f63b22

[26] Kardos, G., Kiss, I. Molecular Epidemiology Investigation of Outbreaks of Fowl Cholera in Geographically Related Poultry Flocks. 2005. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0829cb232485f007137384f09c89905b443d535d