Fowl Cholera in Poultry: Etiology, Clinical Signs, and Zoonotic Implications
Introduction
Fowl cholera, also known as avian cholera or avian pasteurellosis, is a highly contagious and economically devastating bacterial disease affecting a wide range of avian species worldwide [1, 2]. The disease is caused by the gram-negative bacterium Pasteurella multocida and is characterized by acute septicemia with high morbidity and mortality, or chronic localized infections [3, 4]. Fowl cholera represents a significant threat to commercial poultry operations, backyard flocks, and wild bird populations, leading to substantial economic losses due to mortality, decreased egg production, and costs associated with treatment and control measures [5, 6]. Understanding the etiology, clinical presentation, diagnostic approaches, and zoonotic potential of this pathogen is critical for effective disease management and public health protection [7, 8].
Etiology: Fowl Cholera is Caused by Which Bacteria
Fowl cholera is caused by Pasteurella multocida, a small, non-motile, gram-negative coccobacillus belonging to the family Pasteurellaceae [9, 10]. The bacterium is facultatively anaerobic and exhibits bipolar staining when treated with methylene blue or Giemsa stain [11]. P. multocida is classified into five capsular serogroups (A, B, D, E, and F) and 16 lipopolysaccharide (LPS) genotypes (L1 to L16) based on antigenic differences [4, 12]. In poultry, the most commonly isolated capsular serogroup is A, followed by serogroups D and F, with LPS genotypes L1, L3, and L6 being frequently associated with avian disease [13, 14].
The bacterium possesses a wide array of virulence factors that contribute to its pathogenicity, including capsular polysaccharides, outer membrane proteins (OMPs), fimbriae, adhesins, iron acquisition proteins, sialidases, and superoxide dismutases [4, 15]. Capsular serogroup A, characterized by hyaluronic acid production, is particularly associated with fowl cholera outbreaks in chickens and turkeys [16]. Virulence genes commonly detected in avian P. multocida isolates include capA, exbB, hgbB, fur, fim4, fimA, pfhA, tadD, oma87, plpB, nanB, nanH, sodA, and sodC [4, 17]. The presence of these genes enables the bacterium to evade host immune responses, acquire essential nutrients such as iron, adhere to host tissues, and cause systemic infection [18].
P. multocida can exist as a commensal organism in the upper respiratory tract of healthy birds, and stress factors such as overcrowding, poor ventilation, nutritional deficiencies, and concurrent infections can precipitate disease outbreaks [19, 20]. The bacterium is susceptible to environmental conditions but can survive for weeks in organic matter, water, and soil, facilitating indirect transmission [21].
Epidemiology and Transmission
Fowl cholera occurs in all poultry-producing regions of the world and affects a broad range of avian species, including chickens, turkeys, ducks, geese, and game birds [22, 23]. Turkeys are particularly susceptible to acute fowl cholera, often experiencing high mortality rates [24]. The disease is also a significant cause of mortality in wild waterfowl and other free-ranging birds [25].
Transmission of P. multocida occurs through direct contact between infected and susceptible birds, as well as indirect contact via contaminated feed, water, equipment, and fomites [26]. The bacterium is shed in oral, nasal, and conjunctival secretions, as well as in feces, from both clinically ill and carrier birds [27]. Rodents, wild birds, and other animals can serve as mechanical vectors, introducing the pathogen into naive flocks [28].
The epidemiology of fowl cholera is influenced by environmental factors, management practices, and host susceptibility [2, 9]. Outbreaks are more common during cold, wet weather conditions, which may stress birds and facilitate bacterial survival in the environment [22]. Intensive production systems with high stocking densities and poor biosecurity measures are at increased risk for disease introduction and spread [29].
Mathematical modeling of fowl cholera transmission dynamics using compartmental models (e.g., SEIATCR) has demonstrated that the basic reproduction number (R0) is significantly influenced by transmission rate, vaccine efficacy, and treatment rate [9]. Sensitivity analyses indicate that treatment interventions are more effective than culling alone in reducing disease spread, and vaccination remains a critical control measure [9].
Clinical Signs and Pathology
The clinical presentation of fowl cholera varies depending on the virulence of the P. multocida strain, host species, age, immune status, and route of infection [30, 31]. The disease manifests in three primary forms: peracute, acute, and chronic.
Peracute Form
The peracute form is characterized by sudden death with few or no premonitory signs [22, 32]. Birds that appear healthy may die within 8 to 12 hours after infection, often with blood-stained feces around the vent [33]. Mortality in peracute outbreaks can reach 50% or higher within a few days [34].
Acute Form
Acute fowl cholera presents with fever, depression, anorexia, ruffled feathers, mucous discharge from the mouth and nostrils, increased respiratory rate, and diarrhea [32, 35]. Cyanosis of the comb and wattles may be observed, and affected birds often die within 24 to 48 hours of clinical onset [30]. In laying hens, egg production drops precipitously [20].
Chronic Form
Chronic fowl cholera may follow an acute episode or develop independently, particularly in flocks with partial immunity [32]. Clinical signs include localized infections such as swollen wattles (wattle edema), conjunctivitis, sinusitis, torticollis (twisted neck) due to otitis media or meningitis, arthritis, and lameness [30, 35]. Chronic respiratory signs such as rales and dyspnea may also be present [32].
Post-Mortem Lesions
Gross pathological findings in acute fowl cholera include multifocal hepatic necrosis (pinpoint white foci), splenomegaly, petechial hemorrhages on the heart (epicardium) and serosal surfaces, pulmonary congestion and edema, and hemorrhagic enteritis [6, 30]. The liver is often enlarged, friable, and covered with necrotic foci [6]. In chronic cases, lesions are localized and include caseous exudate in the wattles, sinuses, and joints, as well as vegetative valvular endocarditis [24, 30].
Histopathological examination reveals vasculitis, submucosal edema in the trachea, multifocal hepatic necrosis with infiltration of heterophils, and desquamation of intestinal villi [6]. Septic emboli can lead to infarcts in multiple organs, including the heart, kidney, liver, spleen, and pancreas [24].
Diagnostics
Accurate and timely diagnosis of fowl cholera is essential for implementing effective control measures [7, 17]. Diagnostic approaches include clinical and pathological evaluation, bacteriological culture, biochemical identification, molecular detection, and serological assays.
Bacteriological Culture and Identification
P. multocida can be isolated from blood, liver, spleen, lung, bone marrow, and exudative lesions using standard bacteriological media [5, 17]. The bacterium grows on blood agar and MacConkey agar (as non-lactose fermenter) and produces characteristic colonies that are smooth, grayish, and mucoid [11]. Gram staining reveals gram-negative coccobacilli with bipolar staining [11]. Biochemical identification is based on catalase and oxidase positivity, indole production, and lack of hemolysis on sheep blood agar [5, 17].
Molecular Detection
Conventional polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays targeting capsular serogroup-specific genes (e.g., capA, capB, capD, capE, capF) and LPS genotype-specific genes are widely used for confirmation and typing of P. multocida isolates [4, 17]. Multiplex PCR assays can simultaneously detect multiple virulence-associated genes, providing insights into the pathogenic potential of the strain [4, 15].
Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) and multilocus sequence typing (MLST) have become powerful tools for molecular epidemiology, enabling high-resolution discrimination of P. multocida strains and tracking of outbreak sources [19, 26]. Phylogenomic analysis can reveal genetic diversity, antimicrobial resistance (AMR) gene profiles, and virulence factor distribution among isolates [19, 21].
Serological Assays
Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) are used to detect antibodies against P. multocida in serum, tracheal lavage, and crop lavage samples [10, 24]. Indirect ELISA for IgG and sandwich ELISA for IgA are commonly employed to evaluate humoral immune responses following vaccination or natural infection [10, 24].
Predictive Modeling
Advanced data mining and machine learning techniques, including logistic regression, random forest, and gradient boosting, have been applied to predict fowl cholera infection status based on variables such as bird age, vaccination history, environmental conditions, clinical symptoms, and mortality rates [2]. Random forest models have achieved accuracy rates exceeding 94% in classifying infection status, highlighting the potential of big data approaches in veterinary epidemiology [2].
Treatment
Antimicrobial therapy is the primary treatment for fowl cholera, but its efficacy depends on the antimicrobial susceptibility profile of the circulating P. multocida strain [5, 7]. Commonly used antimicrobials include penicillin, ampicillin, norfloxacin, florfenicol, tetracyclines, sulfonamides, and fluoroquinolones [5, 17]. However, the emergence of multidrug-resistant (MDR) P. multocida strains is a growing concern worldwide [21, 27].
Antibiogram profiling using disk diffusion or broth microdilution methods is essential for guiding appropriate antimicrobial selection [5, 17]. Studies have reported variable susceptibility patterns, with some isolates showing resistance to levofloxacin, ciprofloxacin, streptomycin, gentamicin, amoxicillin, tetracycline, and trimethoprim/sulphamethoxazole [4, 5]. MDR strains, defined as resistance to three or more antimicrobial classes, have been documented in several regions, including Bangladesh and Ethiopia [21, 27].
Alternative therapeutic approaches include the use of bacteriophage lysates and multi-strain probiotics [8, 18]. Probiotic supplementation with Lactobacillus plantarum, L. fermentum, Pediococcus acidilactici, Enterococcus faecium, and Saccharomyces cerevisiae has been shown to reduce P. multocida intestinal colonization, improve growth performance, and attenuate inflammatory responses and mortality in broilers [18].
Control and Prevention
Control of fowl cholera relies on a combination of biosecurity measures, vaccination, and management practices [9, 29].
Biosecurity
Strict biosecurity protocols, including all-in/all-out production systems, disinfection of facilities and equipment, control of rodent and wild bird access, and quarantine of newly introduced birds, are critical for preventing introduction and spread of P. multocida [28, 29].
Vaccination
Vaccination is a cornerstone of fowl cholera prevention [10, 15]. Both inactivated (killed) and live attenuated vaccines are available, with inactivated bacterins being the most commonly used in commercial poultry [28, 32]. Autogenous vaccines prepared from farm-specific P. multocida isolates are often employed when commercial vaccines fail to provide adequate protection [19].
Recent advances in vaccine development include gamma-irradiated P. multocida vaccines, which have demonstrated superior immunogenicity compared to formalin-inactivated vaccines [10, 24]. Gamma-irradiated vaccines formulated with adjuvants such as Montanide Gel 01 PR, Emulsigen-D, and aluminum hydroxide gel induce robust serum IgG and mucosal IgA responses, as well as Th1-dominant cellular immunity characterized by upregulation of IFN-gamma, IL-6, and IL-12p40 [10]. Intranasal and intraocular administration of gamma-irradiated mucosal vaccines has achieved 100% protection against homologous lethal challenge in chickens [24].
Iron-inactivated vaccines and subunit vaccines based on supernatant proteins (e.g., aspartate ammonia-lyase, diacylglycerol kinase, 30S ribosomal protein S6) have also shown promise in experimental studies [15, 31]. Bivalent vaccines combining fowl cholera and avian influenza antigens have been developed to provide simultaneous protection against both diseases [1, 3].
Management
Reducing stress factors such as overcrowding, poor ventilation, temperature extremes, and nutritional deficiencies can decrease susceptibility to fowl cholera [20, 29]. Aflatoxin contamination of feed has been shown to impair immune responses to fowl cholera vaccination, highlighting the importance of feed quality management [20].
Zoonotic Implications
The zoonotic potential of Pasteurella multocida is an important consideration for poultry workers, veterinarians, and individuals in close contact with infected birds [7, 8]. While fowl cholera is primarily a disease of birds, P. multocida can cause infections in humans, typically through bites, scratches, or direct contact with contaminated secretions or tissues [8].
Avian Cholera Transmission to Humans
Transmission of P. multocida from poultry to humans is considered rare but well-documented [8]. Human infections most commonly manifest as localized wound infections following a bite or scratch from an infected bird [8]. Systemic infections, including respiratory tract infections, septicemia, meningitis, and endocarditis, can occur in immunocompromised individuals [8]. The capsular serogroups and virulence factors associated with avian isolates are similar to those found in human clinical isolates, suggesting a potential for cross-species transmission [4, 8].
Occupational exposure in poultry processing plants, farms, and veterinary settings poses a risk for zoonotic transmission [8]. Adherence to standard hygiene practices, including hand washing, use of personal protective equipment (gloves, masks), and prompt wound care, is recommended to minimize infection risk [8].
Public Health Considerations
The emergence of MDR P. multocida strains in poultry populations raises concerns about the potential transfer of AMR determinants to human pathogens [21, 27]. Surveillance of antimicrobial resistance patterns in both animal and human isolates is essential for informing treatment guidelines and preserving the efficacy of clinically important antimicrobials [5, 7].
The term "fowl cholera meaning in bengali" refers to the translation and cultural understanding of the disease in Bengali-speaking regions, where poultry farming is a significant livelihood. In Bengali, fowl cholera is commonly referred to as "মুরগির কলেরা" (murgir kolera) or "পোল্ট্রি কলেরা" (poultry kolera). Awareness of the disease's zoonotic potential and preventive measures is critical in these communities to protect both animal and human health.
Conclusion
Fowl cholera remains a major infectious disease of poultry with significant economic and public health implications. The causative agent, Pasteurella multocida, is a highly adaptable pathogen with a diverse arsenal of virulence factors and an increasing prevalence of antimicrobial resistance. Effective control requires a multifaceted approach encompassing biosecurity, vaccination, antimicrobial stewardship, and surveillance. The zoonotic potential of P. multocida, although low, warrants attention from a One Health perspective, emphasizing the interconnectedness of animal and human health.
flowchart TD
A[Clinical Suspicion of Fowl Cholera], > B[History & Clinical Signs]
B, > C[Post-Mortem Examination]
C, > D[Sample Collection: Liver, Spleen, Blood, Bone Marrow]
D, > E[Bacteriological Culture & Gram Stain]
E, > F[Biochemical Identification]
F, > G[Molecular Confirmation: PCR for capA, virulence genes]
G, > H[Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing]
H, > I[Treatment: Antimicrobial Therapy]
I, > J[Control: Biosecurity, Vaccination, Management]
J, > K[Surveillance & Monitoring]
K, > A
References
[1] Rafique M, Shahzad A, Jahangir G, et al. Immunopotential of the Combine Vaccine against Fowl Cholera and Avian Influenza Virus in Poultry. Molecular Genetics Microbiology and Virology. 2025. URL: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ca9806ab35cc83107e0da83a1f2fa958bb9065c2
[2] Amosa BMG, Onyeka NC, Fabiyi AO, et al. Development of a Predictive Model for Fowl-Cholera Infection Status in Poultry Using Advanced Data Mining Analysis Techniques and Logistic Regression Modeling. International Journal of Latest Technology in Engineering Management & Applied Science. 2026. URL: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d897f7ed29c171c9bccec003534ad508692fffb5
[3] Ahsan M, Jalees MM, Ashraf W, et al. Immunization Potency and Protective Efficacy of a Bivalent Inactivated Fowl Cholera and Avian Influenza Vaccine in Poultry. Journal of Population Therapeutics and Clinical Pharmacology. 2024. URL: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3df66604f8375f43488dc80470b1cabf63993042
[4] Arvia MM, Kurnia R, Nugroho C, et al. Characterization of Pasteurella multocida Isolated from Layer Chickens Infected with Fowl Cholera in Sukabumi, Indonesia: Antibiotic Resistance and Virulence Gene Detection. World's Veterinary Journal. 2025. URL: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b3144a59e73f2871956ec37e6abd7ee7f9f9c405
[5] Geda AM, Wendimu A, Lulie S, et al. Molecular Detection and Antibiogram Profiling of Pasteurella multocida Isolated From Breeder Chickens Suspected of Fowl Cholera in Gondar City, Ethiopia. International Journal of Microbiology. 2025. URL: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1a445e3c4b0978b12fe38cc963d29ef0942b2caf
[6] Aliza D, Hasan D, Nazaruddin N, et al. Diagnosis of Fowl Cholera in Broiler Chicken Collected from Banda Aceh and Aceh Besar. Jurnal Medika Veterinaria. 2024. URL: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5b05b9102c0406a89cf0a4b9e39037af51f989cc
[7] Geda AM. Fowl Cholera in Chickens: Current Trends in Diagnosis and Phenotypic Drug Resistance in Gondar City, Ethiopia. Veterinary Medicine International. 2024. URL: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9e27f2f69cf5400f12c927fb142c9730ae27453c
[8] Ramchandran D, Verma H, Prajapati A, et al. Application of bacteriophage lysate for treatment of fowl cholera in poultry. 2012. URL: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/73ac9950100114713fb4b55b8a2ae6df6dc5350f
[9] Malek A. Dynamics of cholera transmission in poultry farm: insights from a compartmental model and control strategies. British Poultry Science. 2025. URL: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4e28597f305d1354a25e1d57072f1cca557749ca
[10] Belay E, Bitew M, Ibrahim SM, et al. Gamma-irradiated fowl cholera vaccines formulated with different adjuvants induced antibody response and cytokine expression in chickens. Frontiers in Immunology. 2025. URL: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2ea1d051381162c2dd3fc5f68fe8150684175426
[11] Tsai HJ, You WB. Short communication. Occurrence of fowl cholera in poultry flocks in Taiwan. 2000. URL: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1bf9237bfc20abd823077c9996335eefc96f9fb6
[12] Petersen KD, Christensen J, Permin A, et al. Virulence of Pasteurella multocida subsp. multocida isolated from outbreaks of fowl cholera in wild birds for domestic poultry and game birds. Avian Pathology. 2001. URL: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/59d66daff2496c892a5f00ff4b3da1127d048680
[13] Ramesh PT. Comparative Evaluation of Biofilm Vaccine with other Conventional Vaccines Against Fowl Cholera in Poultry Layer Birds. 2006. URL: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1ffcee97bcfc7a6989df2e29ab65d86ed54fdcc8
[14] Kardos G, Kiss I. Molecular Epidemiology Investigation of Outbreaks of Fowl Cholera in Geographically Related Poultry Flocks. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 2005. URL: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c24f37dd808124e1d8e14deae58f0cdd90f63b22
[15] Abhilash M, Kannaki T, Priyanka E, et al. Immunogenicity and Protective Efficacy of Iron-inactivated Pasteurella multocida A:1 Vaccine against Fowl Cholera in Backyard Chicken. Indian Journal of Animal Research. 2021. URL: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/860968f51c41f1c31fa48ae6c7c158d48eef5561
[16] Ookanti S. Co-infection of Fowl Cholera with bacterial and viral infection in poultry flocks. URL: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3b1ce0bb4abe36d04b9b280908f7af122a94d165
[17] Isolation and Molecular Identification of Pasteurella multocida from Commercial Poultry Farms Suffering from Fowl Cholera. International Journal of Biology Pharmacy and Allied Sciences. 2019. URL: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f28eeada9fefedf4d3cd97a38609b37a6e90e7f9
[18] Reuben R, Sarkar S, Ibnat H, et al. Novel multi-strain probiotics reduces Pasteurella multocida induced fowl cholera mortality in broilers. Scientific Reports. 2021. URL: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/912b4ed5a84d0b1da383f86833a6f2c493b91b30
[19] Omaleki L, Blackall P, Cuddihy TP, et al. Phase variation in the glycosyltransferase genes of Pasteurella multocida associated with outbreaks of fowl cholera on free-range layer farms. Microbial Genomics. 2022. URL: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/13a4ece8a5d1d8be6e05dd9fce546e76d7c4d317
[20] Hegazy S, Azzam A, Gabal MA. Interaction of naturally occurring aflatoxins in poultry feed and immunization against fowl cholera. Poultry Science. 1991. URL: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/daa7ebcf4c628c9794ac1c26183d7c638b4b7728
[21] Saha O, Islam MR, Rahman MS, et al. First report from Bangladesh on genetic diversity of multidrug-resistant Pasteurella multocida type B:2 in fowl cholera. Veterinary World. 2021. URL: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ad226a5de4b7a13f30ce421a9e620458e03e1a11
[22] Hassan N, Hamadani H, Zargar UR. Rare Outbreak of Fowl Cholera in Waterfowls in Dal Lake Area of Kashmir, with Isolation, Antibiogram and Successful Treatment - A Report. 2017. URL: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4fcb521fb532d3ecc1318f7a0e0764492887dc3f
[23] Wickramasinghe R, Peiris H. An outbreak of fowl cholera in a poultry farm in Sri Lanka. 1985. URL: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/054588a8dc0c3b2a18b4adea9aac028b1b9c33dc
[24] Dessalegn B, Bitew M, Asfaw D, et al. Gamma-Irradiated Fowl Cholera Mucosal Vaccine: Potential Vaccine Candidate for Safe and Effective Immunization of Chicken Against Fowl Cholera. Frontiers in Immunology. 2021. URL: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e122dcdc61144f22067e3cc9a5b4f6d880f2173e
[25] Kardos G, Kiss I. Molecular Epidemiology Investigation of Outbreaks of Fowl Cholera in Geographically Related Poultry Flocks. 2005. URL: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0829cb232485f007137384f09c89905b443d535d
[26] Lai VD, Kim JS, Mo I. Multilocus Sequence Typing of Pasteurella multocida Isolates from Acute Fowl Cholera Outbreak in Layer. Korean Journal of Poultry Science. 2020. URL: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8d43ab3b8f96869062e512da1aed6dea7c99693a
[27] Saha O, Islam MR, Rahman MS, et al. Genome-wide diversity and differentiation of two novel multidrug-resistant populations of Pasteurella multocida type B:2 from fowl cholera. bioRxiv. 2020. URL: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c9191090d60acda1c30c0d1f7ccf0c1dccd45400