Fowl Cholera (Pasteurella multocida) in Poultry: Tagalog Translation and Clinical Guide

Introduction

Fowl cholera is an infectious, contagious bacterial disease of poultry and other avian species caused by the gram-negative coccobacillus Pasteurella multocida [1, 2, 3]. The disease imposes significant economic losses on the global poultry industry through high morbidity and mortality, reduced egg production, and trade restrictions [4, 5]. This article provides a detailed clinical and veterinary review of fowl cholera, with particular attention to its presentation in the Philippines through the integration of the Tagalog translation. The discussion follows the path from etiology through control, supported by dense citation of peer-reviewed literature. For foundational understanding, readers may also refer to the companion article Fowl Cholera: Causal Agent (Pasteurella multocida) and Disease Management in Poultry.

Etiology

Pasteurella multocida is the sole causative agent of fowl cholera. The bacterium is nonmotile, facultatively anaerobic, and typically exhibits bipolar staining when treated with methylene blue or Giemsa stains [3, 6]. Multiple capsular and lipopolysaccharide (LPS) serotypes exist; in poultry, capsular serotypes A and D and LPS genotypes L1, L3, and L6 are most frequently isolated [1, 7, 8]. The pathogen harbors an array of virulence genes, including those encoding capsular polysaccharides (capA), iron acquisition proteins (exbB, hgbB, fur), fimbriae and adhesins (fim4, fimA, pfhA, tadD), outer membrane proteins (oma87, plpB), sialidases (nanB, nanH), and superoxide dismutases (sodA, sodC) [1, 8, 9]. The presence of a capsule is a major virulence determinant, as it inhibits phagocytosis [1]. The bacterium can undergo phase variation in glycosyltransferase genes (e.g., gatG, hptE) that alter LPS outer core structure, enabling immune evasion and contributing to persistent infections on farms [7].

Epidemiology

Fowl cholera affects all poultry species, but turkeys are particularly susceptible, often experiencing acute outbreaks with high mortality [10, 31]. Chickens, ducks, and geese are also commonly affected [6, 35]. Wild birds, including waterfowl and migratory species, serve as reservoirs and can introduce P. multocida into domestic flocks [11, 6]. Outbreaks are often associated with cold, wet weather and stress factors such as overcrowding, poor nutrition, and concurrent infections [6, 12]. The bacterium is transmitted horizontally via respiratory aerosols, contaminated feed and water, and direct contact with infected birds or fomites [5, 6]. Chronically infected carriers and asymptomatic shedders perpetuate the disease within flocks [7]. Molecular epidemiology investigations have revealed that multiple sequence types (STs) can be involved in geographically linked outbreaks, with ST9, ST20, ST122, ST134, ST366, and ST374 reported in various regions [7, 8, 13, 9]. A study from Taiwan documented periodic occurrences of fowl cholera in poultry flocks, underscoring its endemic nature in many parts of Asia [14].

Clinical Signs and Pathogenesis

The pathogenesis of fowl cholera begins with the entry of P. multocida into the upper respiratory tract or oropharynx, followed by colonization of the tonsils and sinuses [10]. The bacteria then invade the bloodstream, leading to septicemia [6, 31]. Virulence factors such as sialidases (nanB, nanH) facilitate mucosal penetration, while iron acquisition systems allow survival within the host [1, 30].

The disease presents in acute, subacute, and chronic forms. The acute form is characterized by sudden onset with high fever, ruffled feathers, depression, anorexia, mucus discharge from the mouth, diarrhea, tachypnea, and cyanosis of the wattles and comb [15, 6, 32]. Peracute cases may show few signs, with birds found dead within 8–12 hours of infection [6, 32]. Mortality can reach 50% or more in untreated flocks [4, 5]. The chronic form often follows an acute episode and manifests as localized swellings of the wattles, sinuses, joints, and foot pads; torticollis (twisted neck) due to otitis media, and respiratory rales [15, 32]. Layers may exhibit a drop in egg production and reduced feed intake [16].

Pathology

Gross pathological findings in acute fowl cholera include multifocal necrotic foci in the liver (the classic "pinhead" necrotic spots) and hemorrhages on the epicardium, serosal surfaces, abdominal fat, and tracheal mucosa [15, 6, 17]. Splenomegaly, hepatomegaly, lung edema, ascites, and fibrinopurulent pericarditis are frequently observed [15, 31, 32]. A notable finding in turkeys is vegetative valvular endocarditis of the aortic valve, which can lead to septic embolization, myocardial infarction, and ventricular rupture [31]. In chronic cases, caseous exudate accumulates in wattles (wattle edema), sinuses (sinusitis), and joints (arthritis) [15, 6].

Histopathological examination reveals acute vasculitis, multifocal hepatic and splenic coagulative necrosis, submucosal edema in the trachea, and desquamation of intestinal villi [15]. In the lungs, congestion and edema with intra-alveolar hemorrhage are common. The brain and meninges may show congestion or purulent exudate in cases with torticollis [15].

Diagnostics

Rapid and accurate diagnosis is essential for effective outbreak management. The following methods are used in sequence or combination.

1. Clinical and Gross Pathological Examination

Preliminary diagnosis is based on characteristic clinical signs (sudden death, depression, diarrhea) and postmortem lesions (hepatic necrosis, hemorrhages) [15, 6]. However, these findings are not pathognomonic and must be confirmed by laboratory tests.

2. Bacteriological Culture and Biochemical Identification

P. multocida is isolated from blood, liver, spleen, bone marrow, or exudates by inoculating samples onto blood agar or tryptic soy agar and incubating at 37°C for 18–24 hours [2, 18]. Colonies are small, grayish, mucoid, and nonhemolytic. Biochemical testing reveals catalase and oxidase positivity; production of indole, nitrate reduction, and lack of hemolysis on MacConkey agar are characteristic [2, 3]. Carbohydrate fermentation patterns (glucose, sucrose, mannitol) aid in species identification [2].

3. Molecular Detection

Conventional polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays targeting capsular serotype genes (e.g., capA, capD) and species-specific 16S rRNA or KMT1 genes provide rapid and specific confirmation [1, 2, 18, 8, 13]. Real-time PCR (qPCR) affords higher sensitivity and can quantify bacterial load. Multilocus sequence typing (MLST) and random amplification of polymorphic DNA (RAPD) PCR are used for epidemiological subtyping [8, 13, 9]. Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) has become the gold standard for high-resolution genotyping and detection of virulence and antimicrobial resistance genes [7, 8, 9].

4. Serological and Immunological Methods

Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) are used to measure serum IgG and secretory IgA responses post-vaccination or after natural infection [19, 20, 33]. Agglutination tests and hemagglutination inhibition (HI) assays can detect antibodies but are less specific [16].

5. Advanced Data Mining and Predictive Modeling

Logistic regression and machine learning algorithms (e.g., random forest, gradient boosting) have been applied to integrate risk factors (bird age, vaccination history, environmental conditions, clinical symptoms) for predicting fowl cholera infection status, achieving accuracies above 90% [4]. These computational models hold promise for early warning systems in poultry health management.

The diagnostic workflow is summarized in the following decision tree diagram.

flowchart TD
    A[Sudden death or clinical signs], > B[Gross pathology: liver necrosis, hemorrhages?]
    B, >|Yes| C[Collect liver, spleen, bone marrow for culture]
    B, >|No| D[Consider other differentials: avian influenza, salmonellosis, coryza]
    C, > E[Blood agar culture 37°C/24h -> grayish mucoid colonies]
    E, > F[Gram-negative coccobacilli, bipolar staining]
    F, > G[Biochemical tests: oxidase+, catalase+, indole+]
    G, > H[PCR: capA/hyaD/hyaC & KMT1 specific]
    H, > I[Positive: Confirm fowl cholera]
    H, > J[Negative: Sequence 16S rRNA or WGS]
    I, > K[Antimicrobial susceptibility testing (disk diffusion / MIC)]
    K, > L[Select appropriate therapy; implement biosecurity & vaccination]

Treatment and Antimicrobial Resistance

Antimicrobial therapy is most effective early in the course of disease. Commonly used drugs include penicillin, ampicillin, tetracyclines, norfloxacin, florfenicol, and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole [1, 2, 3]. However, antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is an increasing concern. A study in Ethiopia found that 7.69% of breeder chicken samples were culture-positive for P. multocida, with all three isolates sensitive to penicillin, ampicillin, norfloxacin, and florfenicol, but intermediate resistance to streptomycin, gentamycin, amoxicillin, tetracycline, and kanamycin [2]. In Indonesia, one out of eight isolates showed resistance to levofloxacin and ciprofloxacin [1]. In Bangladesh, 90.9% of strains from layer hens were multidrug resistant (MDR) and carried AMR genes identified by whole-genome sequencing [8, 9]. These findings highlight the need for routine antibiogram profiling to guide therapy. For detailed information on antimicrobial selection, see Fowl Cholera in Poultry: Antimicrobial Therapy and Control.

Prevention and Control

Biosecurity and Management

Strict biosecurity measures are the foundation of prevention. These include all-in/all-out production, disinfection of vehicles and equipment, control of wild bird access, quarantine of newly introduced birds, and proper disposal of carcasses [6, 10]. Stress reduction through adequate nutrition, ventilation, and housing density lowers disease incidence [5, 16]. Aflatoxin-contaminated feed has been shown to impair vaccine efficacy and increase the severity of fowl cholera outbreaks, necessitating mycotoxin monitoring in feed [16].

Vaccination

Vaccination is a key control tool, especially in endemic regions. Several vaccine types are available:

• Inactivated whole-cell bacterins: Traditional formalin-inactivated vaccines administered intramuscularly provide protection but require multiple doses and are less effective at inducing mucosal immunity [19, 21, 20, 33]. Single-dose potency assays have been developed to reduce evaluation time [33].

• Gamma-irradiated vaccines: Inactivation by gamma irradiation (1 kGy) preserves antigen integrity and induces strong humoral and cellular immunity, including secretory IgA and a Th1-dominant response with high IFN-γ and IL-12 expression [19, 20]. Intranasal or intraocular administration of gamma-irradiated vaccines formulated with Montanide Gel 01 PR conferred 100% protection against homologous challenge in chickens [20].

• Biofilm and iron-inactivated vaccines: Iron-inactivated P. multocida A:1 vaccines and biofilm vaccines have shown protective antibody responses comparable to commercial oil-emulsion vaccines in backyard chickens and layers [22, 21].

• Subunit vaccines: Supernatant proteins produced under iron-restricted conditions, such as aspartate ammonia-lyase (AspA), diacylglycerol kinase (DgK), and 30S ribosomal protein S6 (RpsF), have demonstrated 66.7% to 80% protection when used as immunogens [30].

• Combination vaccines: Bivalent inactivated vaccines against fowl cholera and avian influenza have been evaluated and shown satisfactory immunogenicity in poultry [23, 24].

• Autogenous vaccines: Killed vaccines prepared from farm-specific isolates are commonly used in free-range operations to match the prevalent LPS type, although phase variation in LPS genes can limit cross-protection [7].

• Mucosal vaccines: Intranasal administration of gamma-irradiated or live-attenuated candidates induces robust mucosal IgA responses, which are critical for blocking respiratory colonization [20, 34, 35].

Probiotics and Alternative Therapies

A multi-strain probiotic containing Lactobacillus plantarum, L. fermentum, Pediococcus acidilactici, Enterococcus faecium, and Saccharomyces cerevisiae at 10⁸ CFU/kg feed reduced intestinal P. multocida colonization, improved growth performance, upregulated anti-inflammatory genes (HIF-1α, TSG-6, PTGER2), and decreased mortality in broilers following oral challenge [25]. Bacteriophage lysates have been investigated as a therapeutic option, offering a potential alternative to antibiotics [26].

Culling and Compartmental Models

Mathematical modeling using SEIATCR (Susceptible-Exposed-Symptomatic-Asymptomatic-Treated-Culled-Recovered) frameworks indicates that treatment is more effective than culling for reducing the basic reproduction number (R₀), and that vaccine efficacy has the highest sensitivity index for transmission control [5]. In practice, a combination of vaccination, treatment of sick birds, and selective culling is recommended to manage outbreaks.

Fowl Cholera in Tagalog: Translation and Regional Context

In the Philippines, where poultry farming is a major agricultural sector, fowl cholera is commonly referred to in Tagalog as "kolera ng manok" or "peste ng manok." The term "kolera" derives from the Spanish cólera, reflecting the historical influence of the language on Filipino veterinary nomenclature. The clinical presentation and management principles remain identical to those described above. However, field veterinarians and technicians in the Philippines may encounter specific challenges such as limited access to advanced molecular diagnostics, reliance on autogenous vaccines, and a tropical climate that can influence seasonal outbreak patterns. Understanding the local translation and terminology is critical for effective communication with farmers and for implementing region-specific biosecurity and vaccination programs. Further reading on regional disease guides may be found in Poultry Diseases in Telugu: A Regional Veterinary Reference.

Conclusion

Fowl cholera caused by Pasteurella multocida remains a formidable challenge to poultry health and production worldwide. The bacterium's diverse serotypes, virulence gene repertoire, and ability to undergo phase variation complicate diagnosis and control. Accurate laboratory confirmation through culture, PCR, and genotyping is essential for guiding therapeutic and preventive interventions. Antimicrobial resistance is an emerging threat that underscores the need for prudent drug use and alternative therapies such as probiotics and bacteriophages. Vaccination strategies continue to evolve, with gamma-irradiated and mucosal vaccines showing promise for improved protection. Integration of computational predictive models and genomic surveillance will enhance outbreak preparedness. For the Filipino poultry industry, the translation "kolera ng manok" serves as the basis for farmer education and disease awareness campaigns.

References

[1] Arvia MM, Kurnia R, Nugroho C, et al. Characterization of Pasteurella multocida Isolated from Layer Chickens Infected with Fowl Cholera in Sukabumi, Indonesia: Antibiotic Resistance and Virulence Gene Detection. World's Veterinary Journal. 2025. URL: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b3144a59e73f2871956ec37e6abd7ee7f9f9c405

[2] Geda AM, Wendimu A, Lulie S, et al. Molecular Detection and Antibiogram Profiling of Pasteurella multocida Isolated From Breeder Chickens Suspected of Fowl Cholera in Gondar City, Ethiopia. International Journal of Microbiology. 2025. URL: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1a445e3c4b0978b12fe38cc963d29ef0942b2caf

[3] Geda AM. Fowl Cholera in Chickens: Current Trends in Diagnosis and Phenotypic Drug Resistance in Gondar City, Ethiopia. Veterinary Medicine International. 2024. URL: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9e27f2f69cf5400f12c927fb142c9730ae27453c

[4] Amosa BMG, Onyeka NC, Fabiyi AO, et al. Development of a Predictive Model for Fowl-Cholera Infection Status in Poultry Using Advanced Data Mining Analysis Techniques and Logistic Regression Modeling. International Journal of Latest Technology in Engineering Management & Applied Science. 2026. URL: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d897f7ed29c171c9bccec003534ad508692fffb5

[5] Malek A. Dynamics of cholera transmission in poultry farm: insights from a compartmental model and control strategies. British Poultry Science. 2025. URL: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4e28597f305d1354a25e1d57072f1cca557749ca

[6] Hassan N, Hamadani H, Zargar UR. Rare Outbreak of Fowl Cholera in Waterfowls in Dal Lake Area of Kashmir, with Isolation, Antibiogram and Successful Treatment. 2017. URL: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4fcb521fb532d3ecc1318f7a0e0764492887dc3f

[7] Omaleki L, Blackall P, Cuddihy TP, et al. Phase variation in the glycosyltransferase genes of Pasteurella multocida associated with outbreaks of fowl cholera on free-range layer farms. Microbial Genomics. 2022. URL: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/13a4ece8a5d1d8be6e05dd9fce546e76d7c4d317

[8] Saha O, Islam MR, Rahman MS, et al. First report from Bangladesh on genetic diversity of multidrug-resistant Pasteurella multocida type B:2 in fowl cholera. Veterinary World. 2021. URL: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ad226a5de4b7a13f30ce421a9e620458e03e1a11

[9] Saha O, Islam MR, Rahman MS, et al. Genome-wide diversity and differentiation of two novel multidrug-resistant populations of Pasteurella multocida type B:2 from fowl cholera. bioRxiv. 2020. URL: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c9191090d60acda1c30c0d1f7ccf0c1dccd45400

[10] Fasina Y, Suarez DL, Ritter GD, et al. Unraveling frontiers in poultry health (part 1) – Mitigating economically important viral and bacterial diseases in commercial Chicken and Turkey production. Poultry Science. 2024

[11] Petersen KD, Christensen J, Permin A, et al. Virulence of Pasteurella multocida subsp. multocida isolated from outbreaks of fowl cholera in wild birds for domestic poultry and game birds. Avian Pathology. 2001. URL: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/59d66daff2496c892a5f00ff4b3da1127d048680

[12] Wickramasinghe R, Peiris H. An outbreak of fowl cholera in a poultry farm in Sri Lanka. 1985. URL: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/054588a8dc0c3b2a18b4adea9aac028b1b9c33dc

[13] Lai VD, Kim JS, Mo I. Multilocus Sequence Typing of Pasteurella multocida Isolates from Acute Fowl Cholera Outbreak in Layer. Korean Journal of Poultry Science. 2020. URL: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8d43ab3b8f96869062e512da1aed6dea7c99693a

[14] Tsai HJ, You WB. Short communication. Occurrence of fowl cholera in poultry flocks in Taiwan. 2000. URL: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1bf9237bfc20abd823077c9996335eefc96f9fb6

[15] Aliza D, Hasan D, Nazaruddin N, et al. Diagnosis of Fowl Cholera in Broiler Chicken Collected from Banda Aceh and Aceh Besar. Jurnal Medika Veterinaria. 2024. URL: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5b05b9102c0406a89cf0a4b9e39037af51f989cc

[16] Hegazy S, Azzam A, Gabal MA. Interaction of naturally occurring aflatoxins in poultry feed and immunization against fowl cholera. Poultry Science. 1991. URL: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/daa7ebcf4c628c9794ac1c26183d7c638b4b7728

[17] Kardos G, Kiss I. Molecular Epidemiology Investigation of Outbreaks of Fowl Cholera in Geographically Related Poultry Flocks. 2005. URL: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0829cb232485f007137384f09c89905b443d535d

[18] ISOLATION AND MOLECULAR IDENTIFICATION OF PASTEURELLA MULTOCIDA FROM COMMERCIAL POULTRY FARMS SUFFERING FROM FOWL CHOLERA. International Journal of Biology Pharmacy and Allied Sciences. 2019. URL: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f28eeada9fefedf4d3cd97a38609b37a6e90e7f9

[19] Belay E, Bitew M, Ibrahim SM, et al. Gamma-irradiated fowl cholera vaccines formulated with different adjuvants induced antibody response and cytokine expression in chickens. Frontiers in Immunology. 2025. URL: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2ea1d051381162c2dd3fc5f68fe8150684175426

[20] Dessalegn B, Bitew M, Asfaw D, et al. Gamma-Irradiated Fowl Cholera Mucosal Vaccine: Potential Vaccine Candidate for Safe and Effective Immunization of Chicken Against Fowl Cholera. Frontiers in Immunology. 2021. URL: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e122dcdc61144f22067e3cc9a5b4f6d880f2173e

[21] Abhilash M, Kannaki T, Priyanka E, et al. Immunogenicity and Protective Efficacy of Iron-inactivated Pasteurella multocida A:1 Vaccine against Fowl Cholera in Backyard Chicken. Indian Journal of Animal Research. 2021. URL: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/860968f51c41f1c31fa48ae6c7c158d48eef5561

[22] Ramesh PT. Comparative Evaluation of Biofilm Vaccine with other Conventional Vaccines Against Fowl Cholera in Poultry Layer Birds. 2006. URL: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1ffcee97bcfc7a6989df2e29ab65d86ed54fdcc8

[23] Rafique M, Shahzad A, Jahangir G, et al. Immunopotential of the Combine Vaccine against Fowl Cholera and Avian Influenza Virus in Poultry. Molecular Genetics Microbiology and Virology. 2025. URL: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ca9806ab35cc83107e0da83a1f2fa958bb9065c2

[24] Ahsan M, Jalees MM, Ashraf W, et al. IMMUNIZATION POTENCY AND PROTECTIVE EFFICACY OF A BIVALENT INACTIVATED FOWL CHOLERA AND AVIAN INFLUENZA VACCINE IN POULTRY. Journal of Population Therapeutics and Clinical Pharmacology. 2024. URL: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3df66604f8375f43488dc80470b1cabf63993042

[25] Reuben R, Sarkar S, Ibnat H, et al. Novel multi-strain probiotics reduces Pasteurella multocida induced fowl cholera mortality in broilers. Scientific Reports. 2021. URL: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/912b4ed5a84d0b1da383f86833a6f2c493b91b30

[26] Ramchandran D, Verma H, Prajapati A, et al. Application of bacteriophage lysate for treatment of fowl cholera in poultry. 2012. URL: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/73ac9950100114713fb4b55b8a2ae6df6dc535f0

[27] Kardos G, Kiss I. Molecular Epidemiology Investigation of Outbreaks of Fowl Cholera in Geographically Related Poultry Flocks. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 2005. URL: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c24f37dd808124e1d8e14deae58f0cdd90f63b22

[28] Ookanti S. Co-infection of Fowl Cholera with bacterial and viral infection in poultry flocks. URL: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3b1ce0bb4abe36d04b9b280908f7af122a94d165

[29] Wubet W, Bitew M, Mamo G, et al. Evaluation of inactivated vaccine against fowl cholera developed from local isolates of Pasteurella multocida in Ethiopia. 2019. URL: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/46e9806b5adc51e37f57381d067a40159ce47509