Fowl Cholera (Avian Cholera) in Poultry: Etiology, Epidemiology, Clinical Signs, and Control

Introduction

Fowl cholera, also termed avian cholera or avian pasteurellosis, is a highly contagious and economically significant bacterial disease affecting a wide range of domestic and wild avian species [1, 31]. The disease is caused by the gram-negative bacterium Pasteurella multocida and is characterized by acute septicemia with high morbidity and mortality, or a chronic localized form [2, 31]. Fowl cholera represents a persistent threat to global poultry production, causing substantial economic losses due to mortality, decreased egg production, and the costs associated with treatment and control measures [3, 4]. This article provides a detailed, publication-grade review of the etiology, epidemiology, clinical signs, pathology, diagnostics, treatment, and control of fowl cholera in poultry, with a focus on the molecular and biophysical mechanisms of the disease.

Etiology

The Causative Agent: Pasteurella multocida

Fowl cholera is caused by the bacterium Pasteurella multocida, a small, non-motile, gram-negative coccobacillus that exhibits bipolar staining [5, 1]. The organism is a facultative anaerobe that grows readily on blood agar or tryptic soy agar, producing characteristic colonies that are smooth, mucoid, and iridescent under oblique lighting [5]. The question "fowl cholera is caused by which bacteria" is definitively answered by P. multocida, a member of the family Pasteurellaceae [6, 7].

Serotypes and Genotypes

P. multocida is classified into five capsular serogroups (A, B, D, E, F) and 16 lipopolysaccharide (LPS) genotypes (L1-L16) [6, 8, 9]. In poultry, the most common isolates associated with fowl cholera belong to capsular serogroup A and LPS genotypes L1, L3, and L4 [6, 8, 9]. However, serogroup B isolates have also been reported in fowl cholera outbreaks, particularly in Asia [10, 11]. The capsular serogroup is determined by the presence of specific polysaccharide biosynthesis genes, such as hyaD/hyaC for serogroup A [7]. Molecular typing methods, including multilocus sequence typing (MLST), have identified numerous sequence types (STs) associated with fowl cholera, including ST9, ST20, ST122, ST134, ST366, and ST374 [8, 10, 9, 11].

Virulence Factors

The pathogenicity of P. multocida is mediated by a diverse array of virulence factors that facilitate colonization, immune evasion, and tissue damage [6, 10]. Key virulence-associated genes include those encoding the capsule (capA), iron acquisition proteins (exbB, hgbB, fur), fimbriae and adhesins (fim4, fimA, pfhA, tadD), outer membrane proteins (oma87, plpB), sialidases (nanB, nanH), and superoxide dismutases (sodA, sodC) [6, 10]. The LPS outer core biosynthesis loci are subject to phase variation, a mechanism that allows the bacterium to alter its surface antigenic profile and evade host immune responses [8]. This phase variation, mediated by frameshift mutations in glycosyltransferase genes such as htpE and gatG, has been implicated in the re-emergence of fowl cholera in free-range layer flocks [8].

Epidemiology

Host Range and Susceptibility

Fowl cholera affects a broad range of avian species, including chickens, turkeys, ducks, geese, and game birds [12, 1, 34]. Turkeys are particularly susceptible, often experiencing acute outbreaks with high mortality [30]. The disease is also a significant cause of mortality in wild waterfowl, with outbreaks frequently associated with wetland habitats that serve as environmental reservoirs for the bacterium [1, 35].

Transmission and Risk Factors

Transmission of P. multocida occurs primarily through direct contact between infected and susceptible birds, as well as through contaminated feed, water, and fomites [5, 4]. The bacterium can be shed in oral, nasal, and conjunctival secretions, as well as in feces [5]. Chronically infected carrier birds are a major reservoir for the pathogen, facilitating its persistence within flocks [5, 35]. Environmental stressors, including cold and wet weather, overcrowding, poor ventilation, and nutritional deficiencies, predispose birds to clinical disease [1, 35]. The adoption of free-range production systems has been associated with a re-emergence of fowl cholera, likely due to increased exposure to environmental reservoirs and wild bird populations [8, 35].

Zoonotic Potential

The question of "avian cholera transmission to humans" is an important consideration for poultry workers and veterinarians. P. multocida is a zoonotic pathogen capable of causing localized infections in humans, typically following bites, scratches, or contact with contaminated secretions from infected animals [6]. In humans, P. multocida infections most commonly manifest as cellulitis, abscesses, or wound infections, and less frequently as respiratory tract infections or septicemia [6]. While the risk of transmission from poultry to humans is considered low, appropriate biosecurity measures, including the use of personal protective equipment, are recommended when handling infected birds or contaminated materials [6].

Global Distribution and Economic Impact

Fowl cholera has a worldwide distribution, with outbreaks reported across all continents where poultry are raised [3, 6, 13, 10, 14]. The disease is endemic in many regions, including parts of Africa, Asia, and the Americas [3, 7, 5, 10]. The economic impact of fowl cholera is substantial, stemming from direct mortality, reduced egg production, weight loss, and the costs of treatment, vaccination, and biosecurity measures [3, 4]. Predictive modeling using data mining techniques has identified bird age, vaccination history, and environmental conditions as significant predictors of infection status, highlighting the multifactorial nature of disease risk [3].

Clinical Signs

Acute Form

The acute form of fowl cholera is characterized by a sudden onset of severe septicemia, often resulting in death within 8 to 12 hours of infection [1, 31]. Clinical signs may be minimal or absent in peracute cases, with birds found dead in good body condition [2, 30]. In acute cases, affected birds exhibit fever, depression, anorexia, ruffled feathers, and increased respiratory rate [31]. Mucoid or bloody discharge from the mouth and nostrils is common, as is profuse, watery diarrhea [31]. Cyanosis of the comb and wattles may be observed [2].

Chronic Form

The chronic form of fowl cholera may follow an acute outbreak or develop independently, particularly in flocks with low-level endemic infection [31]. Clinical signs are associated with localized infections and include swollen wattles (wattle edema), sinuses, and joints (arthritis) [2, 31]. Torticollis (twisted neck) due to meningeal involvement, rales, and conjunctivitis are also observed [31]. Chronic infections can lead to reduced feed intake, weight loss, and decreased egg production [15].

Pathology

Gross Lesions

Postmortem examination of birds succumbing to acute fowl cholera reveals characteristic gross lesions indicative of septicemia [2]. These include multifocal hepatic necrosis, which appears as small, pale, pinhead-sized foci scattered throughout the liver parenchyma [2, 31]. Petechial and ecchymotic hemorrhages are present on the heart (epicardium and coronary fat), serosal surfaces, and in the musculature [2]. The lungs are often congested and edematous, and the thoracic and abdominal cavities may contain serosanguinous fluid (ascites) [2]. In chronic cases, localized lesions such as caseous exudate in the wattles, sinuses, and joint capsules are observed [31]. Vegetative valvular endocarditis, particularly of the aortic valve, has been documented in turkeys, leading to septic embolization and infarcts in multiple organs, including the heart, liver, kidney, and spleen [30].

Histopathological Lesions

Histopathological examination reveals acute vasculitis, thrombosis, and fibrinoid necrosis of blood vessels [2]. Multifocal coagulative necrosis with infiltration of heterophils and macrophages is observed in the liver [2]. The lungs exhibit congestion, edema, and fibrin exudation [2]. In the heart, myocardial necrosis and bacterial emboli may be present [30]. Submucosal edema and desquamation of intestinal villi are also characteristic findings [2].

Diagnostics

Clinical and Pathological Diagnosis

A presumptive diagnosis of fowl cholera is often based on the history of sudden mortality, characteristic clinical signs, and gross pathological lesions, particularly the presence of multifocal hepatic necrosis and petechial hemorrhages [2, 5]. However, definitive diagnosis requires laboratory confirmation [5].

Bacteriological Isolation and Identification

Isolation of P. multocida from tissues (liver, spleen, heart blood, bone marrow) or swabs (tracheal, oropharyngeal) is the gold standard for diagnosis [7, 5]. Samples are cultured on blood agar or MacConkey agar under aerobic conditions at 37 degrees Celsius for 24 to 48 hours [7, 5]. P. multocida appears as small, gray, mucoid colonies that are non-hemolytic on blood agar and do not grow on MacConkey agar [7]. Identification is confirmed by Gram staining (gram-negative coccobacilli with bipolar staining) and biochemical tests, including positive reactions for catalase, oxidase, and indole, and fermentation of glucose and sucrose [7, 5].

Molecular Diagnostics

Molecular techniques, particularly polymerase chain reaction (PCR), offer rapid and specific detection of P. multocida directly from clinical samples or from bacterial isolates [7, 5, 16]. Capsular serotyping PCR targets genes specific to each capsular serogroup (e.g., hyaD/hyaC for serogroup A) [7, 9]. LPS genotyping PCR differentiates between LPS genotypes [8, 9]. Multilocus sequence typing (MLST) provides high-resolution genotyping for epidemiological investigations [9]. Advanced data mining and machine learning algorithms, such as Random Forest and Logistic Regression, have been applied to large datasets to develop predictive models for fowl cholera infection status, achieving high accuracy [3].

Serological Assays

Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) are used to detect antibodies against P. multocida in serum, providing information on flock exposure and vaccine response [17, 18, 19]. Indirect ELISA measures serum IgG levels, while sandwich ELISA can detect secretory IgA in tracheal and crop lavage samples [17, 19].

Treatment

Antimicrobial Therapy

Treatment of fowl cholera relies on the administration of antimicrobial agents, ideally guided by antibiogram profiling due to the emergence of antimicrobial resistance [6, 7, 5]. Historically, tetracyclines, sulfonamides, and penicillins have been used [7]. However, resistance to these agents is increasingly reported [6, 10]. Studies have shown that P. multocida isolates may exhibit sensitivity to florfenicol, norfloxacin, and ampicillin, while showing intermediate or complete resistance to streptomycin, gentamycin, and tetracycline [7]. Multidrug-resistant strains, particularly those of serotype B:L2:ST122, have been documented in Bangladesh, harboring a range of antimicrobial resistance genes [10, 11]. The use of bacteriophage lysates has also been explored as an alternative therapeutic approach [20].

Supportive Care

Supportive care, including provision of clean water, adequate nutrition, and reduction of environmental stressors, is essential to support recovery in affected flocks [4].

Control and Prevention

Biosecurity

Strict biosecurity measures are the cornerstone of fowl cholera prevention [5]. These include controlling access to poultry facilities, implementing all-in/all-out management, cleaning and disinfecting equipment and housing, and preventing contact between domestic poultry and wild birds [5, 35]. Rodent and insect control is also important, as these pests can act as mechanical vectors [5].

Vaccination

Vaccination is a critical component of fowl cholera control programs [4, 17, 18]. Both inactivated (killed) and live attenuated vaccines are available [17, 18, 19]. Inactivated vaccines, often formulated as bacterins or oil-emulsion vaccines, are widely used but may provide variable protection, particularly against heterologous serotypes [17, 21, 32]. The efficacy of inactivated vaccines can be evaluated using single-dose or booster-dose potency assays, with booster doses generally providing higher protection indices [32].

Novel Vaccine Approaches

Recent research has focused on developing more effective vaccines. Gamma-irradiated P. multocida vaccines have shown promise, inducing robust humoral (IgG and IgA) and cell-mediated (Th1) immune responses, with complete protection against homologous challenge in some formulations [17, 19]. Iron-inactivated vaccines, prepared from bacteria grown under iron-restricted conditions, have also demonstrated protective efficacy [18]. Subunit vaccines based on supernatant proteins identified under iron-restricted conditions, such as aspartate ammonia-lyase (AspA) and 30S ribosomal protein S6 (RpsF), have induced up to 80% protection in experimental trials [29]. Biofilm-based vaccines have been comparatively evaluated against conventional vaccines [22]. Bivalent vaccines combining fowl cholera and avian influenza antigens have been developed to provide simultaneous protection against both diseases [23, 24]. The interaction of aflatoxins in feed with vaccine efficacy is a concern, as aflatoxin contamination can significantly reduce antibody titers following vaccination [15].

Probiotics

The use of multi-strain probiotics containing Lactobacillus plantarum, L. fermentum, Pediococcus acidilactici, Enterococcus faecium, and Saccharomyces cerevisiae has been shown to reduce P. multocida colonization, improve growth performance, and decrease mortality in broilers challenged with the pathogen [25]. Probiotics also upregulated anti-inflammatory genes in the intestinal mucosa, suggesting a role in modulating the host immune response [25].

Mathematical Modeling of Control Strategies

Mathematical models, such as the susceptible-exposed-symptomatic-asymptomatic-treated-culled-recovered (SEIATCR) model, have been used to simulate the dynamics of fowl cholera transmission in poultry farms [4]. These models indicate that treatment and culling are effective control measures, with treatment being more effective than culling in reducing the basic reproduction number (R0) [4]. Sensitivity analysis has identified transmission rate and vaccine efficacy as the most sensitive parameters influencing disease spread [4].

Conclusion

Fowl cholera remains a major infectious disease of poultry, caused by Pasteurella multocida. Its control requires a multifaceted approach encompassing accurate diagnosis, targeted antimicrobial therapy guided by susceptibility testing, rigorous biosecurity, and effective vaccination. The emergence of multidrug-resistant strains and the re-emergence of the disease in free-range systems underscore the need for continued research into novel vaccines, alternative therapeutics such as probiotics and bacteriophages, and advanced epidemiological modeling to inform control strategies.

References

[1] N. Hassan, H. Hamadani, U. R. Zargar. Rare Outbreak of Fowl Cholera in Waterfowls in Dal Lake Area of Kashmir, with Isolation, Antibiogram and Successful Treatment - A Report. 2017. URL: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4fcb521fb532d3ecc1318f7a0e0764492887dc3f

[2] D. Aliza, D. Hasan, Nazaruddin Nazaruddin et al. Diagnosis of Fowl Cholera in Broiler Chicken Collected from Banda Aceh and Aceh Besar. Jurnal Medika Veterinaria. 2024. URL: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5b05b9102c0406a89cf0a4b9e39037af51f989cc

[3] Amosa, B. M. G, Onyeka, N.C, Fabiyi, A. O et al. Development of a Predictive Model for Fowl-Cholera Infection Status in Poultry Using Advanced Data Mining Analysis Techniques and Logistic Regression Modeling. International Journal of Latest Technology in Engineering Management & Applied Science. 2026. URL: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d897f7ed29c171c9bccec003534ad508692fffb5

[4] A. Malek. Dynamics of cholera transmission in poultry farm: insights from a compartmental model and control strategies. British Poultry Science. 2025. URL: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4e28597f305d1354a25e1d57072f1cca557749ca

[5] Abdo Megra Geda. Fowl Cholera in Chickens: Current Trends in Diagnosis and Phenotypic Drug Resistance in Gondar City, Ethiopia. Veterinary Medicine International. 2024. URL: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9e27f2f69cf5400f12c927fb142c9730ae27453c

[6] Marsella Metta Arvia, R. Kurnia, C. Nugroho et al. Characterization of Pasteurella multocida Isolated from Layer Chickens Infected with Fowl Cholera in Sukabumi, Indonesia: Antibiotic Resistance and Virulence Gene Detection. World's Veterinary Journal. 2025. URL: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b3144a59e73f2871956ec37e6abd7ee7f9f9c004

[7] Abdo Megra Geda, Aregash Wendimu, Solomon Lulie et al. Molecular Detection and Antibiogram Profiling of Pasteurella multocida Isolated From Breeder Chickens Suspected of Fowl Cholera in Gondar City, Ethiopia. International Journal of Microbiology. 2025. URL: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1a445e3c4b0978b12fe38cc963d29ef0942b2caf

[8] L. Omaleki, P. Blackall, Thom P. Cuddihy et al. Phase variation in the glycosyltransferase genes of Pasteurella multocida associated with outbreaks of fowl cholera on free-range layer farms. Microbial Genomics. 2022. URL: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/13a4ece8a5d1d8be6e05dd9fce546e76d7c4d317

[9] Van Dam Lai, Jong-Seung Kim, I. Mo. Multilocus Sequence Typing of Pasteurella multocida Isolates from Acute Fowl Cholera Outbreak in Layer. Korean Journal of Poultry Science. 2020. URL: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8d43ab3b8f96869062e512da1aed6dea7c99693a

[10] Otun Saha, M. R. Islam, M. S. Rahman et al. First report from Bangladesh on genetic diversity of multidrug-resistant Pasteurella multocida type B:2 in fowl cholera. Veterinary World. 2021. URL: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ad226a5de4b7a13f30ce421a9e620458e03e1a11

[11] Otun Saha, M. R. Islam, M. S. Rahman et al. Genome-wide diversity and differentiation of two novel multidrug-resistant populations of Pasteurella multocida type B:2 from fowl cholera. bioRxiv. 2020. URL: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c9191090d60acda1c30c0d1f7ccf0c1dccd45400

[12] K. D. Petersen, J. Christensen, A. Permin et al. Virulence of Pasteurella multocida subsp. multocida isolated from outbreaks of fowl cholera in wild birds for domestic poultry and game birds. Avian Pathology. 2001. URL: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/59d66daff2496c892a5f00ff4b3da1127d048680

[13] Tsai HsiangJung, You Wen-Bin. Short communication. Occurrence of fowl cholera in poultry flocks in Taiwan. 2000. URL: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1bf9237bfc20abd823c0779996335eefc96f9fb6

[14] R. Wickramasinghe, H. Peiris. An outbreak of fowl cholera in a poultry farm in Sri Lanka. 1985. URL: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/054588a8dc0c3b2a18b4adea9aac028b1b9c33dc

[15] S. Hegazy, A. Azzam, M. A. Gabal. Interaction of naturally occurring aflatoxins in poultry feed and immunization against fowl cholera. Poultry Science. 1991. URL: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/daa7ebcf4c628c9794ac1c26183d7c638b4b7728

[16] ISOLATION AND MOLECULAR IDENTIFICATION OF PASTEURELLA MULTOCIDA FROM COMMERCIAL POULTRY FARMS SUFFERING FROM FOWL CHOLERA. International Journal of Biology Pharmacy and Allied Sciences. 2019. URL: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f28eeada9fefedf4d3cd97a38609b37a6e90e7f9

[17] Eyerusalem Belay, M. Bitew, S. M. Ibrahim et al. Gamma-irradiated fowl cholera vaccines formulated with different adjuvants induced antibody response and cytokine expression in chickens. Frontiers in Immunology. 2025. URL: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2ea1d051381162c2dd3fc5f68fe8150684175426

[18] M. Abhilash, T. Kannaki, E. Priyanka et al. Immunogenicity and Protective Efficacy of Iron-inactivated Pasteurella multocida A:1 Vaccine against Fowl Cholera in Backyard Chicken. Indian Journal of Animal Research. 2021. URL: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/860968f51c41f1c31fa48ae6c7c158d48eef5561

[19] B. Dessalegn, M. Bitew, D. Asfaw et al. Gamma-Irradiated Fowl Cholera Mucosal Vaccine: Potential Vaccine Candidate for Safe and Effective Immunization of Chicken Against Fowl Cholera. Frontiers in Immunology. 2021. URL: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e122dcdc61144f22067e3cc9a5b4f6d880f2173e

[20] D. Ramchandran, Harshit Verma, Awadhesh Prajapati et al. Application of bacteriophage lysate for treatment of fowl cholera in poultry. 2012. URL: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/73ac9950100114713fb4b55b8a2ae6df6dc535f0

[21] W. Wubet, M. Bitew, G. Mamo et al. Evaluation of inactivated vaccine against fowl cholera developed from local isolates of Pasteurella multocida in Ethiopia. 2019. URL: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/46e980

[22] P. T. Ramesh. Comparative Evaluation of Biofilm Vaccine with other Conventional Vaccines Against Fowl Cholera in Poultry Layer Birds. 2006. URL: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1ffcee97fdc3a6989df2e29ab65d86ed54fdcc8

[23] M. Rafique, A. Shahzad, G. Jahangir et al. Immunopotential of the Combine Vaccine against Fowl Cholera and Avian Influenza Virus in Poultry. Molecular Genetics Microbiology and Virology. 2025. URL: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ca9806ab35cc83107e0da83a1f2fa958bb9065c2

[24] Muhammad Ahsan, M. M. Jalees, Waqas Ashraf et al. IMMUNIZATION POTENCY AND PROTECTIVE EFFICACY OF A BIVALENT INACTIVATED FOWL CHOLERA AND AVIAN INFLUENZA VACCINE IN POULTRY. Journal of Population Therapeutics and Clinical Pharmacology. 2024. URL: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3df66604f8375f43488dc80470b1cabf63993042

[25] R. Reuben, S. Sarkar, H. Ibnat et al. Novel multi-strain probiotics reduces Pasteurella multocida induced fowl cholera mortality in broilers. Scientific Reports. 2021. URL: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/912b4ed5a84d0b1da383f86833a6f2c493b91b30

[26] Gábor Kardos, I. Kiss. Molecular Epidemiology Investigation of Outbreaks of Fowl Cholera in Geographically Related Poultry Flocks. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 2005. URL: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c24f37dd808124e1d8e14deae58f0cdd90f63b22

[27] Srikanth Ookanti. Co-infection of Fowl Cholera with bacterial and viral infection in poultry flocks. URL: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3b1ce0bb4abe36d04b9b280908f7af122a94d165

[28] G. Kardos. I . Kiss Geographically Related Poultry Flocks Outbreaks of Fowl Cholera in Molecular Epidemiology Investigation of. 2005. URL: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0829cb232485f007137384f09c89905b443d535d