Section: Avian Bacteria

Duck Viral Enteritis: Etiology, Clinical Presentation, and Control

Introduction

Duck viral enteritis (DVE), also known as duck plague, is an acute, highly contagious, and often fatal viral disease affecting waterfowl of the order Anseriformes, including ducks, geese, and swans [1]. The disease is caused by Anatid herpesvirus 1 (AnHV-1), a member of the subfamily Alphaherpesvirinae within the family Herpesviridae [2, 3]. DVE represents a significant threat to domestic duck production and wild waterfowl populations worldwide, causing substantial economic losses and conservation concerns [4, 5]. This article provides an exhaustive review of the etiology, epidemiology, clinical presentation, pathology, diagnostic approaches, treatment options, and control measures for DVE, with a focus on the molecular mechanisms of pathogenesis and recent advances in vaccine development. For a general overview of this topic, readers are directed to the article on Duck Viral Enteritis: Etiology, Clinical Signs, and Control.

Etiology

Virus Classification and Genomic Structure

The causative agent of DVE, Anatid herpesvirus 1, is a double-stranded DNA virus with a genome size of approximately 150-160 kbp [2, 6]. The complete genome sequences of several virulent and attenuated strains have been characterized, revealing a complex genomic architecture encoding numerous structural and non-structural proteins [2, 7, 3]. The genome is organized into a unique long (UL) region and a unique short (US) region, flanked by inverted repeat sequences, a typical feature of alphaherpesviruses [6]. A novel variant with a deletion in the UL2 gene has been identified, demonstrating the genetic plasticity of the virus [7, 8].

Viral Proteins and Pathogenesis

The virus encodes multiple proteins that contribute to its replication, virulence, and immune evasion. The UL50 gene product has been functionally characterized as essential for viral replication and pathogenesis [9]. The UL24 protein initiates K48/K63-linked polyubiquitination of interferon regulatory factor 7 (IRF7), thereby antagonizing the innate immune response [10]. Similarly, the US3 protein kinase phosphorylates IRF7 to inhibit DNA sensing signaling pathways [11]. The VP26 protein interacts with the host actin-myosin II network to regulate viral proliferation [12]. The UL14 protein regulates virion morphogenesis and affects viral replication efficiency [13]. The LORF4 gene has been identified as a late gene that is nonessential for in vitro replication [14].

Immune Evasion Mechanisms

Duck enteritis virus (DEV) has evolved sophisticated strategies to evade host immune responses. The virus inhibits the cGAS-STING DNA sensing pathway, a critical component of the innate antiviral response [15]. By targeting this pathway, DEV prevents the activation of downstream interferon production, facilitating its replication and spread within the host [15]. The US3 protein kinase-mediated phosphorylation of IRF7 represents another mechanism by which the virus subverts host antiviral signaling [11]. These immune evasion strategies contribute to the high pathogenicity observed in susceptible waterfowl populations.

Epidemiology

Host Range and Susceptibility

DVE primarily affects ducks, geese, and swans, with variable susceptibility among different species and age groups [1]. Muscovy ducks (Cairina moschata) and Pekin ducks (Anas platyrhynchos domestica) are highly susceptible, while some wild waterfowl species may act as asymptomatic carriers [5]. The disease has been reported in multiple continents, including Asia, Europe, North America, and Australia [1]. A virulent strain causing outbreaks in vaccinated duck flocks has been isolated, indicating the emergence of vaccine-resistant variants [4]. A novel variant derived from geese has also been characterized, suggesting cross-species transmission events [5].

Transmission Dynamics

Transmission occurs through direct contact with infected birds or indirect contact with contaminated water, feed, or fomites [16]. The virus is shed in oral secretions, feces, and on feather surfaces, leading to rapid dissemination within flocks [16]. Horizontal transmission has been documented in non-target species, raising concerns about the spread of live attenuated vaccine strains [16]. The virus can persist in water environments for extended periods, facilitating transmission among wild waterfowl populations [1].

Risk Factors

Outbreaks are often associated with stress factors such as overcrowding, poor nutrition, concurrent infections, and environmental changes [4]. The introduction of new birds into a flock without adequate quarantine measures is a common precipitating factor [1]. Vaccination failures, as reported in some outbreaks, may be attributed to antigenic variation, improper vaccine administration, or immunosuppression [4].

Clinical Presentation

Incubation Period and Disease Course

The incubation period for DVE ranges from 3 to 14 days, depending on the viral strain, dose, and host susceptibility [1]. The disease can manifest in peracute, acute, or chronic forms. Peracute cases are characterized by sudden death with minimal premonitory signs, often in highly susceptible populations [1]. Acute cases present with a constellation of clinical signs affecting multiple organ systems.

Clinical Signs

Affected birds exhibit anorexia, polydipsia, lethargy, and ruffled feathers [1]. Ocular and nasal discharges are common, often accompanied by conjunctivitis and photophobia [1]. Diarrhea is a prominent feature, with feces ranging from watery to hemorrhagic [1]. Neurological signs, including ataxia, tremors, and opisthotonos, may be observed in some cases [1]. In laying ducks, a sharp drop in egg production is a characteristic finding [1]. Cutaneous hemorrhages and cyanosis of the bill and legs are frequently noted [1].

What Is Ducks Disease?

The colloquial term "what is ducks disease" often refers to DVE, given its historical significance and devastating impact on duck flocks. However, it is important to note that multiple pathogens can cause similar clinical presentations in ducks, necessitating laboratory confirmation for accurate diagnosis. For a broader perspective on duck health issues, the article on Duck Disease: Etiology and Management of Duck Viral Enteritis provides additional context.

Pathology

Gross Lesions

Postmortem examination reveals characteristic lesions in multiple organ systems. Vascular damage is a hallmark of DVE, with widespread petechial and ecchymotic hemorrhages on the serosal surfaces of the heart, liver, pancreas, and gastrointestinal tract [1]. The liver is often enlarged, friable, and mottled with pale necrotic foci [1]. The spleen may be enlarged and congested [1]. The gastrointestinal tract exhibits severe inflammation, with erosions, ulcers, and hemorrhages in the esophagus, crop, and intestines [1]. The cloaca often contains diphtheritic membranes and ulcerations [1].

Histopathology

Microscopic examination reveals necrosis and hemorrhage in multiple organs. Hepatocytes show coagulative necrosis with intranuclear inclusion bodies [1]. Lymphoid tissues, including the spleen and bursa of Fabricius, exhibit lymphoid depletion and necrosis [1]. The intestinal mucosa shows villous atrophy, crypt necrosis, and inflammatory cell infiltration [1]. Vascular endothelial cells demonstrate swelling, necrosis, and fibrinoid degeneration, contributing to the hemorrhagic diathesis [1].

Diagnostics

Clinical and Pathological Assessment

A presumptive diagnosis of DVE can be made based on history, clinical signs, and gross pathological findings [1]. However, definitive diagnosis requires laboratory confirmation due to the similarity of DVE to other diseases such as avian influenza, Newcastle disease, and fowl cholera [1]. For a detailed discussion of diagnostic approaches, refer to the article on Duck Viral Enteritis: Clinical Presentation and Diagnosis.

Molecular Diagnostic Methods

Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) based assays are the gold standard for DVE diagnosis due to their high sensitivity and specificity. Conventional PCR targeting conserved regions of the viral genome, such as the DNA polymerase gene, is widely used [17]. Real-time PCR assays provide quantitative viral load data and are suitable for high-throughput screening [17]. Recombinase polymerase amplification (RPA) assays, including real-time fluorescence RPA and RPA combined with lateral flow detection (RPA-LFD), have been developed for rapid, field-deployable detection of virulent strains [18, 17]. Multienzyme isothermal rapid amplification (MIRA) assays offer another isothermal amplification platform for point-of-care diagnostics [17].

Serological Assays

Serological testing, including virus neutralization tests and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs), can detect antibodies against DEV [19]. These assays are useful for surveillance and monitoring vaccine responses but are less suitable for acute diagnosis due to the time required for seroconversion [19].

Virus Isolation

Virus isolation in embryonated duck eggs or cell cultures, such as chicken embryo fibroblasts (CEFs) or duck embryo fibroblasts (DEFs), remains a reference method for confirmatory diagnosis [19, 20]. The virus induces characteristic cytopathic effects, including cell rounding, syncytia formation, and plaque formation [19]. Isolates can be further characterized by genomic sequencing and pathogenicity testing [4, 21].

Differential Diagnosis

DVE must be differentiated from other viral and bacterial diseases affecting waterfowl. Key differentials include avian influenza, Newcastle disease, duck hepatitis virus infection, and fowl cholera (Pasteurella multocida infection) [1]. The presence of esophageal and cloacal lesions is highly suggestive of DVE but not pathognomonic [1]. Laboratory testing is essential for definitive differentiation.

Treatment

Supportive Care

There is no specific antiviral therapy approved for DVE. Supportive care, including fluid therapy, nutritional support, and stress reduction, may improve survival in mild cases [1]. The use of broad-spectrum antibiotics to control secondary bacterial infections is recommended [1].

Antiviral Agents

Experimental studies have investigated the potential of antiviral compounds against DEV. Piperazine has been shown to inhibit AnHV-1 infection in vitro, possibly through modulation of host cytokines [22]. Chlorogenic acid has demonstrated antiviral activity in DEFs infected with DEV, as revealed by RNA-seq analysis [20]. Poly I:C, a synthetic double-stranded RNA analog, alleviated duck intestinal injury during DVE infection by inhibiting apoptosis [23]. These findings suggest potential therapeutic avenues, but none have been translated into licensed veterinary products.

Control

Vaccination

Vaccination is the cornerstone of DVE control in domestic duck populations. Live attenuated vaccines, typically derived from chicken embryo fibroblast cultures, are widely used [19]. These vaccines induce robust humoral and cellular immune responses, providing protection against virulent challenge [19, 24]. Recombinant DEV vectors expressing heterologous antigens, such as the hemagglutinin genes of influenza virus, duck hepatitis A virus 3 immunogenic genes, and Pasteurella multocida OmpH, have been developed as bivalent or multivalent vaccines [25, 26, 27, 28]. CRISPR/Cas9 editing technology has been employed to construct recombinant DEV vaccines expressing Chlamydia psittaci antigens, demonstrating the versatility of the DEV genome as a vaccine platform [29].

Vaccine Safety and Efficacy

Concerns regarding vaccine safety include the potential for reversion to virulence and transmission to non-target species [16]. Attenuated strains with combined gene deletions have been developed to enhance safety while maintaining immunogenicity [30]. Marker vaccines, such as those containing ICP27 deletion, allow serological differentiation between vaccinated and infected birds (DIVA strategy) [24]. The tissue tropism and horizontal transmission of DEV vectored vaccines have been evaluated in one-day-old chickens, demonstrating limited replication and no transmission, supporting their safety profile [31, 32].

Biosecurity Measures

Strict biosecurity protocols are essential for preventing DVE introduction and spread. These include quarantine of new birds, disinfection of equipment and facilities, control of visitor access, and prevention of contact with wild waterfowl [1]. All-in-all-out management practices reduce the risk of pathogen carryover between flocks [1].

Eradication and Surveillance

In regions where DVE is endemic, vaccination combined with biosecurity is the primary control strategy [1]. In disease-free areas, stamping out policies with depopulation of infected and contact flocks, followed by thorough cleaning and disinfection, are implemented to prevent establishment [1]. Surveillance programs using molecular and serological methods are critical for early detection and monitoring of circulating strains [17, 19].

Future Perspectives

Genomic Characterization and Pathogenicity

Continued genomic characterization of circulating DEV strains is essential for understanding viral evolution and emergence of vaccine-resistant variants [4, 2, 7]. Pathogenicity evaluation of attenuated strains and identification of virulence genes will inform the rational design of safer vaccines [21, 8]. Proteomic screening for cellular targets of viral proteins, such as VP26, provides insights into virus-host interactions that may be exploited for therapeutic intervention [12].

Recombinant Vaccine Development

The development of recombinant DEV vectors expressing multiple immunogenic genes offers the potential for multivalent vaccines against DVE and other waterfowl pathogens [25, 33, 27]. The use of CRISPR/Cas9 editing for precise genome manipulation facilitates the construction of stable, safe, and efficacious vaccine candidates [29, 28]. The expression of goose astrovirus Cap protein delivered via a DEV vector demonstrates the platform's utility for targeting emerging viral diseases [34].

Immunological Studies

Understanding the host immune response to DEV infection is critical for vaccine design and evaluation. Expression profiles of toll-like receptors, major histocompatibility complex (MHC) genes, and cytokines in infected ducklings provide a comprehensive view of the innate and adaptive immune responses [35]. The role of the cGAS-STING pathway and IRF7 in antiviral immunity highlights potential targets for immune modulation [15, 11].

Diagnostic Workflow

The following Mermaid diagram illustrates a diagnostic decision tree for DVE, integrating clinical, pathological, and molecular approaches.

flowchart TD
    A[Suspected DVE Case], > B{Clinical Signs & History}
    B, >|Sudden death, hemorrhages, diarrhea| C[Gross Necropsy]
    C, > D{Characteristic Lesions?}
    D, >|Esophageal/cloacal ulcers, hepatic necrosis| E[Collect Samples]
    D, >|Atypical lesions| F[Consider Differentials]
    F, > G[Avian Influenza, NDV, Fowl Cholera]
    E, > H[Laboratory Testing]
    H, > I{Molecular Detection}
    I, >|PCR/RPA Positive| J[Confirm DVE]
    I, >|PCR/RPA Negative| K[Virus Isolation]
    K, >|CPE Observed| J
    K, >|No CPE| L[Serology]
    L, >|Seroconversion| J
    L, >|Negative| M[Rule Out DVE]
    J, > N[Report & Control Measures]
    N, > O[Vaccination, Biosecurity, Quarantine]

Conclusion

Duck viral enteritis remains a significant threat to waterfowl health and production worldwide. Advances in genomic characterization, molecular diagnostics, and recombinant vaccine technology have improved our ability to detect, prevent, and control this disease. The emergence of virulent strains in vaccinated flocks underscores the need for continuous surveillance and vaccine refinement. Integrated control strategies combining vaccination, biosecurity, and rapid diagnostic testing are essential for minimizing the impact of DVE on domestic and wild waterfowl populations.

References

[1] Islam MM, Islam J, Islam MS et al. Duck virus enteritis (duck plague) outbreak in an Australian black swan (Cygnus atratus) flock at safari park in Bangladesh: A case report. J Adv Vet Anim Res. 2021. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35106294/

[2] Yasmin L, Siddique MS, Islam T et al. Complete genome sequence of a virulent duck enteritis virus isolated from Northern part of Bangladesh. Microbiol Resour Announc. 2025. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41134219/

[3] Aasdev A, Pawar SD, Mishra A et al. First complete genome characterization of duck plague virus from India. Virusdisease. 2021. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34901326/ *** Disclaimer: This article is for educational and informational purposes only. It is not intended to substitute for professional veterinary advice, diagnosis, treatment, or regulatory guidance. Always consult a licensed veterinarian or qualified specialist regarding animal health, disease diagnosis, and therapeutic decisions.

[4] Sang S, Wang H, Dan Y et al. Isolation, identification and pathogenicity analysis of a virulent duck enteritis virus strain causing outbreak in vaccinated duck flocks. Poult Sci. 2026. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42322961/

[5] Guo Z, Zhang S, Sun Y et al. Genomic characteristics, pathogenicity and viral shedding of a novel DVEV variant derived from goose. Poult Sci. 2023. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36745957/

[6] Huo SX, Zhu YC, Chen L et al. Complete Genome Sequence and Construction of an Infectious Bacterial Artificial Chromosome Clone of a Virulent Duck Enteritis Virus Strain XJ. Transbound Emerg Dis. 2024. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40303036/

[7] Yang H, Zhang B, Yang X et al. Complete genome sequence and biological characteristics of a novel duck enteritis virus variant with a deletion in UL2. Arch Virol. 2025. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40991013/

[8] Yin D, Gao Y, Xu M et al. Pathogenic mechanisms and molecular features of a novel UL2 gene-deficient duck enteritis virus endemic to China. Virulence. 2025. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40801158/

[9] Huo SX, Chen L, Bao ED et al. Functional characterization of UL50 gene reveals its essential role in duck enteritis virus replication and pathogenesis. Vet Q. 2026. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41876382/

[10] Ruan P, Chen Y, Wang M et al. Duck plague virus UL24 protein initiates K48/K63-linked IRF7 polyubiquitination to antagonize the innate immune response. Poult Sci. 2024. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39418790/

[11] Liu R, Gao L, Yang F et al. Duck Enteritis Virus Protein Kinase US3 Inhibits DNA Sensing Signaling by Phosphorylating Interferon Regulatory Factor 7. Microbiol Spectr. 2022. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36287016/

[12] Chen L, Zhu YC, Yun T et al. Proteomic Screening for Cellular Targets of the Duck Enteritis Virus Protein VP26 Reveals That the Host Actin-Myosin II Network Regulates the Proliferation of the Virus. Int J Mol Sci. 2025. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41009665/

[13] Wan J, Li F, Wang M et al. The protein encoded by the duck plague virus UL14 gene regulates virion morphogenesis and affects viral replication. Poult Sci. 2022. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35489250/

[14] Huang J, Wang M, Cheng A et al. Duck enteritis virus LORF4 gene is a late gene and nonessential for virus replication in vitro. Poult Sci. 2024. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39288717/

[15] Gao L, Liu R, Yang F et al. Duck Enteritis Virus Inhibits the cGAS-STING DNA-Sensing Pathway To Evade the Innate Immune Response. J Virol. 2022. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36448809/

[16] Kong J, Feng K, Zhao Q et al. Pathogenicity and transmissibility studies on live attenuated duck enteritis virus vaccine in non-target species. Front Microbiol. 2022. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36439841/

[17] Dai Y, Hu X, Zhong Y et al. Rapid Detection of Duck Enteritis Virus with MIRA, MIRA-qPCR, and MIRA-LFD Assays. Pathogens. 2025. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41156591/

[18] Wan J, Zhu Y, Xu X et al. [Development of a rapid detection method for a virulent strain of duck enteritis virus based on real-time fluorescence recombinase polymerase amplification]. Sheng Wu Gong Cheng Xue Bao. 2026. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42009547/

[19] Dandapat S, Bindu S, Sharma GK et al. Development and evaluation of a chicken embryo fibroblast cell culture based live attenuated Indian strain duck plague vaccine. Vet Q. 2024. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38726839/

[20] Yang Y, Zhang Q, Cai H et al. RNA-seq analysis of chlorogenic acid intervention in duck embryo fibroblasts infected with duck plague virus. Virol J. 2024. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38454409/

[21] Shi X, Zhuang H, Shuo D et al. Pathogenicity Evaluation and Virulence Gene Identification of an Attenuated Duck Enteritis Virus. Microorganisms. 2025. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41304222/

[22] Bhattacharya S, Kumar S. Piperazine inhibits Anatid herpesvirus-1 infection by possible modulation of host cytokines. Microb Pathog. 2025. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40484049/

[23] Zhang Y, Wu Y, Zhang X et al. Poly I: C Alleviated Duck Intestinal Injury Infected with Duck Viral Enteritis by Inhibiting Apoptosis. Curr Microbiol. 2024. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39105989/

[24] Wu Y, Liu L, Zhang M et al. A Recombinant Duck Plague Virus Containing the ICP27 Deletion Marker Provides Robust Protection in Ducks. Microbiol Spectr. 2023. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37404171/

[25] Jia W, Wang A, Wu Z et al. Construction and characterization of recombinant duck enteritis virus expressing duck hepatitis A virus 3 immunogenic genes. Poult Sci. 2026. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41850054/

[26] Zhao Y, Ma Q, Jiao C et al. Recombinant duck enteritis virus harboring the hemagglutinin genes of influenza virus rapidly induces specific cellular immunity in ducks. J Virol. 2026. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41467842/

[27] Apinda N, Muenthaisong A, Chomjit P et al. Simultaneous Protective Immune Responses of Ducks against Duck Plague and Fowl Cholera by Recombinant Duck Enteritis Virus Vector Expressing Pasteurella multocida OmpH Gene. Vaccines (Basel). 2022. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36016245/

[28] Apinda N, Yao Y, Zhang Y et al. CRISPR/Cas9 Editing of Duck Enteritis Virus Genome for the Construction of a Recombinant Vaccine Vector Expressing ompH Gene of Pasteurella multocida in Two Novel Insertion Sites. Vaccines (Basel). 2022. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35632442/

[29] Liu J, Wang Y, Tang N et al. CRISPR/Cas9-edited duck enteritis virus expressing Pmp17G of Chlamydia psittaci induced protective immunity in ducklings. Pathog Dis. 2024. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39400699/

[30] Kong J, Han C, Shao G et al. Virulence attenuation of intestinal pathogenicity via combined gene deletion in duck enteritis vaccine strain restores gut microbiota balance and enhances safety. Poult Sci. 2026. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41764962/

[31] Abdulrahim Y, You Y, Wang L et al. Correction: Abdulrahim et al. Evaluation of Tissue Tropism and Horizontal Transmission of a Duck Enteritis Virus Vectored Vaccine in One-Day-Old Chicken. Viruses 2024, 16, 1681. Viruses. 2024. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39772278/

[32] Abdulrahim Y, You Y, Wang L et al. Evaluation of Tissue Tropism and Horizontal Transmission of a Duck Enteritis Virus Vectored Vaccine in One-Day-Old Chicken. Viruses. 2024. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39599796/

[33] Jia WF, Wang AP, Wu Z et al. Current status of recombinant duck enteritis virus vector vaccine research. Front Vet Sci. 2025. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39974164/

[34] Chen L, Zhu Y, Yun T et al. In vitro expression of the goose astrovirus Cap protein delivered with a duck enteritis virus vector. BMC Vet Res. 2025. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40317044/

[35] Kumar J, Dandapat S, Panickan S et al. Expression profiles of toll like receptors, MHC and cytokine genes along with viral load in organs of ducklings infected with an Indian isolate of duck enteritis virus. Microb Pathog. 2022. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35339656/