Common Bacterial Pathogens in Chickens: Identification and Antimicrobial Management

Introduction

Bacterial infections in commercial and backyard chicken flocks represent a significant burden on poultry health, welfare, and productivity. The economic impact arises from mortality, reduced egg production, decreased feed conversion efficiency, and carcass condemnation at slaughter [1, 2]. Moreover, several chicken bacterial pathogens are zoonotic, posing public health risks through direct contact or consumption of contaminated meat and eggs [3, 4, 5]. Effective management requires accurate identification of the etiologic agent, understanding its virulence mechanisms, and judicious use of antimicrobials guided by susceptibility testing. This article provides a detailed review of the most common bacterial pathogens affecting chickens, with emphasis on molecular identification methods and antimicrobial management strategies.

Gram-Negative Pathogens

Avian Pathogenic Escherichia coli (APEC)

Avian pathogenic Escherichia coli (APEC) is the causative agent of colibacillosis, a systemic disease manifesting as airsacculitis, pericarditis, perihepatitis, salpingitis, and yolk sac infection in chicks [6, 7, 50]. APEC strains belong predominantly to serogroups O1, O2, and O78, but numerous other serotypes have been reported [8, 36]. The pathogenicity of APEC is multifactorial, involving adhesins (e.g., type 1 fimbriae, P fimbriae), iron acquisition systems (e.g., aerobactin, TonB-dependent receptors), toxins (e.g., hemolysins, cytotoxic necrotizing factor), and protectins (e.g., lipopolysaccharide, capsule) [7, 9, 10, 52]. Whole genome sequencing has enabled the identification of minimal virulence marker sets for rapid detection [11]. Multiplex PCR assays targeting genes such as iroN, iss, iucD, tsh, and vat are commonly used to differentiate APEC from commensal E. coli [11, 7]. Antimicrobial resistance in APEC is widespread, with high prevalence of resistance to tetracyclines, sulfonamides, and beta-lactams [2, 12, 13, 40]. Colistin resistance mediated by mcr-1 has been reported in chicken isolates, raising concerns about last-resort antibiotic efficacy [12, 13]. Biofilm formation further complicates treatment by reducing antimicrobial penetration [12].

Salmonella enterica

Salmonellosis in chickens is caused by host-adapted serovars (e.g., Salmonella Gallinarum biovar Pullorum and biovar Gallinarum) and broad-host-range serovars (e.g., Salmonella Enteritidis, Salmonella Typhimurium) [3, 5, 14, 37]. Host-adapted serovars cause systemic disease (pullorum disease and fowl typhoid), while broad-host-range serovars typically produce subclinical intestinal carriage but are major foodborne zoonotic pathogens [3, 5, 42]. Identification relies on culture and serotyping, but molecular methods such as PCR-RFLP of the fliC gene and multiplex real-time PCR targeting serovar-specific genes are increasingly used [14, 37]. Virulence gene profiling reveals the presence of invA, spvC, sopB, and sseL among others [5, 15]. Antimicrobial resistance in poultry Salmonella is a global concern, with multidrug-resistant (MDR) strains carrying resistance genes for beta-lactams (e.g., blaTEM, blaCTX-M), fluoroquinolones (e.g., mutations in gyrA), and sulfonamides [3, 4, 46]. The monophasic variant Salmonella 4,[6],12:i:- has emerged as a significant MDR serovar in poultry [38].

Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli

Campylobacter species, particularly C. jejuni and C. coli, are commensal inhabitants of the chicken intestinal tract but are the leading bacterial cause of human gastroenteritis worldwide [16, 17, 18, 30]. Colonization in chickens is typically asymptomatic, but certain strains can cause mild enteritis [43]. Identification is performed by selective culture under microaerophilic conditions, followed by biochemical tests or PCR targeting the cadF gene or 16S rRNA [16, 53]. Multilocus sequence typing (MLST) reveals high genetic diversity among poultry isolates [19, 30, 49]. Virulence-associated genes include flaA, cdtABC, ciaB, and virB11 [16, 18, 43]. Antimicrobial resistance in Campylobacter from chickens is increasing, particularly to fluoroquinolones and macrolides, which are critically important for human medicine [17, 19]. Resistance mechanisms include target mutations (e.g., gyrA for quinolones) and efflux pumps [17].

Avibacterium paragallinarum

Avibacterium paragallinarum is the etiologic agent of infectious coryza, an acute respiratory disease of chickens characterized by nasal discharge, facial edema, and conjunctivitis [20]. The bacterium is a Gram-negative coccobacillus requiring enriched media (e.g., chocolate agar) with Staphylococcus feeder streaks for primary isolation [20]. A highly sensitive and specific probe-based real-time PCR assay targeting the HMTp210 gene has been developed for direct detection from clinical samples [20]. Antimicrobial therapy is often empirical, but resistance to sulfonamides and tetracyclines has been documented [20]. Vaccination with inactivated bacterins is widely used for control.

Ornithobacterium rhinotracheale

Ornithobacterium rhinotracheale is a Gram-negative rod associated with respiratory disease in turkeys and chickens, often as a co-pathogen with other agents [21]. Isolation requires blood agar under microaerophilic conditions. Molecular identification using 16S rRNA sequencing or species-specific PCR is reliable [21]. Antimicrobial resistance profiling of O. rhinotracheale isolates from turkeys showed high resistance to tetracyclines and macrolides, with variable susceptibility to florfenicol and enrofloxacin [21].

Gallibacterium anatis

Gallibacterium anatis is a Gram-negative coccobacillus implicated in salpingitis, peritonitis, and respiratory infections in laying hens [34]. A hemagglutinin has been identified as a potential virulence factor [34]. Diagnosis relies on culture and PCR targeting the 16S rRNA gene. Antimicrobial susceptibility patterns vary, with some isolates showing resistance to tetracyclines and sulfonamides [34].

Brachyspira Species

Brachyspira species, including B. pilosicoli and B. intermedia, cause intestinal spirochetosis in chickens, leading to reduced growth and egg production [22]. Identification is based on anaerobic culture on selective media and PCR targeting the nox gene. Molecular characterization of UK chicken isolates revealed novel variants of pleuromutilin and beta-lactam resistance genes, indicating ongoing evolution of resistance [22].

Gram-Positive Pathogens

Clostridium perfringens

Clostridium perfringens type A and type G (formerly type C) are the primary causes of necrotic enteritis in broiler chickens, a disease characterized by severe intestinal necrosis and high mortality [23, 35]. The key virulence factor is NetB toxin (type G) or alpha toxin (type A) [23, 35]. Diagnosis is based on gross and histopathological lesions, anaerobic culture, and PCR detection of toxin genes (netB, cpa) [23]. Antimicrobial management traditionally involves bacitracin, virginiamycin, or lincomycin, but alternatives such as probiotics, organic acids, and essential oils are being explored due to antimicrobial resistance concerns [23].

Staphylococcus aureus

Coagulase-positive staphylococci, primarily Staphylococcus aureus, cause bumblefoot (pododermatitis), osteomyelitis, and septicemia in chickens [32, 39]. Identification involves culture on mannitol salt agar, coagulase testing, and PCR targeting the nuc gene. Virulence factors include enterotoxins, hemolysins, and biofilm-associated genes [39]. Vancomycin resistance has been reported in poultry isolates, though at low prevalence [39]. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing is essential due to frequent methicillin resistance (MRSA) [39].

Enterococcus Species

Enterococcus faecalis and E. faecium are opportunistic pathogens causing amyloid arthropathy, endocarditis, and septicemia in chickens [41]. They are also indicators of fecal contamination in meat products. Identification is by bile esculin agar and PCR targeting ddl genes. Virulence genes include gelE, esp, and cylA [41]. High-level aminoglycoside resistance and vancomycin resistance (vanA, vanB) have been detected in poultry enterococci [41].

Mycoplasma Species

Mycoplasma gallisepticum

Mycoplasma gallisepticum is a major respiratory pathogen causing chronic respiratory disease (CRD) in chickens, often in combination with other agents such as Escherichia coli or Newcastle disease virus [24, 51]. Diagnosis relies on serology (ELISA, hemagglutination inhibition) and molecular methods. A multiplex TaqMan real-time PCR assay has been developed to differentiate wild-type from vaccine strains (e.g., ts-11, 6/85), enabling accurate surveillance [24]. Antimicrobial therapy with tylosin, tilmicosin, or enrofloxacin is common, but resistance has been reported [51].

Mycoplasma synoviae

Mycoplasma synoviae causes infectious synovitis and respiratory disease, and is associated with eggshell apex abnormalities in layers [33]. Genome analysis of the MS-H vaccine strain has provided insights into attenuation mechanisms [33]. Diagnosis is by PCR targeting the vlhA gene or 16S rRNA [33].

Diagnostic Approaches

Accurate identification of bacterial pathogens in chickens requires a combination of culture, biochemical tests, and molecular methods. Table 1 summarizes key diagnostic features for the major pathogens.

Table 1. Diagnostic Features of Common Chicken Bacterial Pathogens

High-throughput next-generation sequencing (NGS) of 16S rRNA amplicons or whole genomes provides comprehensive bacterial community profiling and can detect unculturable or unexpected pathogens [25]. NGS also enables detailed antimicrobial resistance gene and virulence gene characterization [11, 22, 25].

A diagnostic workflow for bacterial disease investigation in chickens is presented in Figure 1.

flowchart TD
    A["Clinical signs: respiratory, enteric, systemic"] --> B[Postmortem examination & lesion scoring]
    B --> C["Sample collection: swabs, tissues, feces"]
    C --> D{Initial Gram stain & microscopy}
    D -->|Gram-negative rods| E["Selective culture: MacConkey, XLD, mCCDA"]
    D -->|Gram-positive cocci| F["Selective culture: MSA, BEA"]
    D -->|No cell wall| G[Mycoplasma culture or PCR]
    E --> H[Biochemical identification & MALDI-TOF]
    F --> H
    G --> I[Serology or PCR]
    H --> J[Species-specific PCR or 16S rRNA sequencing]
    J --> K[Virulence gene profiling]
    K --> L["Antimicrobial susceptibility testing (disk diffusion, MIC")]
    L --> M["Therapeutic decision: narrow-spectrum, based on MIC"]
    M --> N[Monitor clinical response & re-test if failure]

Antimicrobial Management

Antimicrobial therapy should be guided by culture and susceptibility testing to minimize resistance development and ensure efficacy. Table 2 lists commonly used antimicrobial classes and their typical indications in chickens.

Table 2. Antimicrobial Classes Used in Chicken Bacterial Infections

Antimicrobial resistance is a growing problem in poultry pathogens worldwide [1, 2, 22, 12, 13, 40]. Multidrug-resistant (MDR) Gram-negative bacteria, including APEC and Salmonella, have been isolated from chickens in many regions [3, 2, 4]. Colistin resistance, mediated by mcr-1, is particularly alarming as colistin is a last-resort antibiotic in human medicine [12, 13]. In Campylobacter, fluoroquinolone resistance is common and limits treatment options for human infections [17, 19]. For Clostridium perfringens, alternatives to antibiotics such as probiotics, prebiotics, organic acids, and enzymes are being investigated to reduce reliance on antimicrobials [23].

Judicious use principles include: accurate diagnosis, selection of narrow-spectrum agents when possible, adherence to withdrawal periods, and implementation of biosecurity and vaccination programs to reduce infection pressure. Vaccines are available for Salmonella Enteritidis, Mycoplasma gallisepticum, infectious coryza, and necrotic enteritis (toxoid) [23, 20, 51].

Conclusion

Bacterial pathogens remain a major challenge in chicken production, with APEC, Salmonella, Campylobacter, Mycoplasma, and Clostridium perfringens being the most clinically and economically significant. Accurate identification using culture, PCR, and sequencing is essential for targeted therapy. Antimicrobial resistance is widespread and requires continuous surveillance and prudent antimicrobial use. Integrated control strategies combining biosecurity, vaccination, and alternative therapies are necessary to sustain poultry health and food safety.

References

[1] Kanwal B, Asif E, Kalhoro NH, et al. Prevalence of Antimicrobial-Resistant Bacterial Pathogens Among Livestock in Subtropical Environments. Antibiotics (Basel). 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42192683/

[2] Munim MA, Das SC, Hossain MM, et al. Multi-drug resistant (MDR) Gram-negative pathogenic bacteria isolated from poultry in the Noakhali region of Bangladesh. PLoS One. 2024. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39088478/

[3] Popy NN, Khan MFR, Islam MS, et al. Serovar-Specific Antimicrobial Resistance and Virulence Profiles of Salmonella enterica From Poultry in Bangladesh. Microbiologyopen. 2025. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41123578/

[4] Al-Shafee AAJ, Abdulwahid MT. Occurrence, antimicrobial resistance, and molecular characterization of Salmonella enterica from chicken products and human in Wasit Governorate of Iraq. Open Vet J. 2024. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38938436/

[5] Nazari Moghadam M, Rahimi E, Shakerian A, et al. Prevalence of Salmonella Typhimurium and Salmonella Enteritidis isolated from poultry meat: virulence and antimicrobial-resistant genes. BMC Microbiol. 2023. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37322421/

[6] Steffen RPB, Queiroz B, Silva AT, et al. Avian pathogenic Escherichia coli (APEC) isolated from chicks and embryos in the hatchery. Braz J Microbiol. 2025. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40366575/

[7] Ovi F, Zhang L, Nabors H, et al. A compilation of virulence-associated genes that are frequently reported in avian pathogenic Escherichia coli (APEC) compared to other E. coli. J Appl Microbiol. 2023. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36754368/

[8] Mageiros L, Méric G, Bayliss SC, et al. Genome evolution and the emergence of pathogenicity in avian Escherichia coli. Nat Commun. 2021. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33536414/

[9] Zhang Z, Jiang S, Liu Y, et al. Identification of ireA, 0007, 0008, and 2235 as TonB-dependent receptors in the avian pathogenic Escherichia coli strain DE205B. Vet Res. 2020. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31973724/

[10] Gao Q, Xia L, Wang X, et al. SodA Cont

[11] Kazimierczak J, Pospiech K, Sowińska P, et al. A rapid detection of Avian Pathogenic Escherichia coli (APEC) strains based on minimal number of virulence markers identified by whole genome sequencing. BMC Microbiol. 2025. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40091036/

[12] Dhaouadi S, Romdhani A, Bouglita W, et al. High Biofilm-Forming Ability and Clonal Dissemination among Colistin-Resistant Escherichia coli Isolates Recovered from Cows with Mastitis, Diarrheic Calves, and Chickens with Colibacillosis in Tunisia. Life (Basel). 2023. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36836656/

[13] Shafiq M, Huang J, Shah JM, et al. Characterization and resistant determinants linked to mobile elements of ESBL-producing and mcr-1-positive Escherichia coli recovered from the chicken origin. Microb Pathog. 2021. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33421607/

[14] Munir A, Ilyas SZ, Tahir H, et al. PCR based early detection and antibiotic resistance pattern of Salmonella Gallinarum isolates from Pakistan poultry. J Microbiol Methods. 2023. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37015313/

[15] Chiok KLR, Shah DH. Identification of common highly expressed genes of Salmonella Enteritidis by in silico prediction of gene expression and in vitro transcriptomic analysis. Poult Sci. 2019. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30953073/

[16] Wanja DW, Mbindyo CM, Mbuthia PG, et al. Molecular Detection of Virulence-Associated Markers in Campylobacter coli and Campylobacter jejuni Isolates From Water, Cattle, and Chicken Faecal Samples From Kajiado County, Kenya. Biomed Res Int. 2024. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39166218/

[17] El Baaboua A, El Maadoudi M, Bouyahya A, et al. Prevalence and antimicrobial profiling of Campylobacter spp. isolated from meats, animal, and human feces in Northern of Morocco. Int J Food Microbiol. 2021. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33991875/

[18] Sierra-Arguello YM, Perdoncini G, Rodrigues LB, et al. Identification of pathogenic genes in Campylobacter jejuni isolated from broiler carcasses and broiler slaughterhouses. Sci Rep. 2021. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33633256/

[19] Awad A, Elkenany R, Sadat A, et al. Multilocus Sequence Typing (MLST) of Campylobacter jejuni Isolated From Broiler Meat in Egypt. Pak J Biol Sci. 2019. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31930855/

[20] Kuchipudi SV, Yon M, Surendran Nair M, et al. A Highly Sensitive and Specific Probe-Based Real-Time PCR for the Detection of Avibacterium paragallinarum in Clinical Samples From Poultry. Front Vet Sci. 2021. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33912603/

[21] Yusefinejad S, Gharibi D, Khosravi M, et al. Isolation, identification, antibiotic resistance profile and molecular analysis of Ornithobacterium rhinotracheale isolates from turkeys. Vet Med Sci. 2024. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38837675/

[22] Stubberfield E, AbuOun M, Card RM, et al. Molecular characterization of antimicrobial resistance in Brachyspira species isolated from UK chickens: Identification of novel variants of pleuromutilin and beta-lactam resistance genes. Vet Microbiol. 2024. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38306769/

[23] Abd El-Hack ME, El-Saadony MT, Elbestawy AR, et al. Necrotic enteritis in broiler chickens: disease characteristics and prevention using organic antibiotic alternatives - a comprehensive review. Poult Sci. 2022. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34953377/

[24] Xin J, Zhang J, Liang S, et al. A multiplex TaqMan real-time PCR assay for differential identification of wild-type and vaccine strains of Mycoplasma gallisepticum. Poult Sci. 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41702344/

[25] Kunert-Filho HC, Furian TQ, Sesterhenn R, et al. Bacterial community identification in poultry carcasses using high-throughput next generation sequencing. Int J Food Microbiol. 2022. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35066330/

[26] Uea-Anuwong T, Wen C, Qing H, et al. Detection of pathogenic Leptospira spp. in peridomestic Rattus norvegicus in Hong Kong. One Health. 2025. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40822317/

[27] Wongkuna S, Ambat A, Ghimire S, et al. Identification of a microbial sub-community from the feral chicken gut that reduces Salmonella colonization and improves gut health in a gnotobiotic chicken model. Microbiol Spectr. 2024. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38315031/

[28] Yang Y, Lu Y, Zhou Y, et al. Identification and characterization of microRNAs, especially gga-miR-181b-5p, in chicken macrophages associated with avian pathogenic E. coli infection. Avian Pathol. 2023. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36803112/

[29] Almashhadany DA, Mayas SM, Ali NL. Isolation and identification of Helicobacter pylori from raw chicken meat in Dhamar Governorate, Yemen. Ital J Food Saf. 2022. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35795467/

Disclaimer: This article is for educational and informational purposes only. It is not intended to substitute for professional veterinary advice, diagnosis, treatment, or regulatory guidance. Always consult a licensed veterinarian or qualified specialist regarding animal health, disease diagnosis, and therapeutic decisions.