Chicken Bacteria Food Poisoning: Pathogens, Clinical Syndromes, and Public Health Implications

1. Introduction

Foodborne diseases of bacterial origin acquired through the consumption of contaminated chicken meat and eggs represent a substantial burden on public health systems worldwide [56, 101]. Poultry, particularly broiler chickens, serve as a primary reservoir for a range of enteric pathogens that can be transmitted to humans via the food chain [1, 52]. The most significant bacterial agents include thermophilic Campylobacter species (primarily C. jejuni and C. coli), non-typhoidal Salmonella enterica serovars, avian pathogenic Escherichia coli (APEC), Clostridium perfringens, Listeria monocytogenes, and Staphylococcus aureus [56, 78, 82]. These organisms are often carried asymptomatically in the avian gastrointestinal tract, leading to contamination of carcasses during slaughter and processing [67, 87]. The present article provides an exhaustive veterinary-oriented review of the major bacterial pathogens associated with chicken-derived food poisoning, detailing their biological characteristics, clinical syndromes in poultry, and the broader public health implications, with a focus on antimicrobial resistance (AMR) and source attribution.

2. Major Bacterial Pathogens

2.1 Campylobacter Species

Campylobacter jejuni and C. coli are the leading bacterial causes of human gastroenteritis in many developed regions, and poultry is the principal source of infection [2, 3, 66]. These microaerophilic, Gram-negative, spiral-shaped bacteria colonize the cecal and colonic mucosa of broiler chickens without causing overt disease in the host [4, 53]. The colonization process is facilitated by flagella-mediated motility and adhesins that bind to intestinal epithelial cells [5]. The high prevalence of Campylobacter in commercial broiler flocks is well documented; a systematic review and meta-analysis of Italian studies reported pooled prevalences exceeding 60% at the flock level [2]. Similarly, longitudinal surveillance in Beijing over eight years demonstrated the dominance of C. jejuni and C. coli and their clonal spread through poultry production networks [3]. Danish studies using whole-genome sequencing have confirmed the clonal persistence of specific Campylobacter lineages on broiler farms and their direct association with human clinical cases.

From a clinical perspective, Campylobacter is considered a commensal in chickens. Experimental inoculation models show robust cytokine responses in the cecal tonsils but no significant pathology. Transcriptome-wide analyses of chicken ceca following C. jejuni inoculation reveal N6-methyladenosine modifications that may regulate immune gene expression. The organism’s lipooligosaccharide and capsular polysaccharide (e.g., the HS:19 serotype) are key virulence determinants, and the biosynthetic pathway for the undecorated capsular polysaccharide has been elucidated [5]. Recent concerns include the emergence of multidrug-resistant and hyperaerotolerant strains of C. jejuni and C. coli in retail chicken meat in Malaysia, which could survive longer in aerobic environments.

2.2 Salmonella enterica

Non-typhoidal Salmonella enterica is a major zoonotic pathogen, with poultry products being a primary vehicle for transmission [101, 70]. Serovars such as Enteritidis, Typhimurium, Infantis, and Kentucky are frequently isolated from broiler chickens and retail meat [6, 7, 49, 81, 93]. Salmonella colonizes the intestinal tract of chickens, particularly the ceca, and can also invade internal organs, leading to systemic infection in young birds [8, 9]. The pathogenesis involves type III secretion systems (T3SS) that inject effector proteins into host cells; for example, the virulence factor SptP activates the NLRP3/caspase-1 pathway to induce pyroptosis and exacerbate intestinal injury in chicks. Additionally, SIRT1 has been shown to attenuate host resistance by negatively regulating immune responses during Salmonella infection [10]. In vivo models for gastrointestinal Salmonella infections have been extensively reviewed [8].

The prevalence and diversity of Salmonella in chicken production are driven by geographical and management factors. In China, fifty years of surveillance revealed evolutionary shifts in epidemiology and genomic lineages, with increasing AMR [7]. In Northern Algeria, a high occurrence of Salmonella spp. from broilers was reported, with significant resistance to commonly used antibiotics [11]. Genomic studies from Argentina, Bangladesh, South Korea, and Thailand confirm the global distribution of multidrug-resistant (MDR) strains. Notably, Salmonella Infantis has emerged as a rapidly spreading MDR serovar in broiler flocks in Korea and has been characterized with multi-omics approaches, including variants with altered hydrogen sulfide production. Salmonella Kentucky isolates from chicken in China have been compared genomically with isolates from other regions, highlighting regional differences in resistance and virulence gene profiles.

Clinical syndromes in chickens vary from asymptomatic carriage to severe enteritis and septicemia, particularly in young chicks [30, 79]. The use of probiotics, competitive exclusion cultures [12, 13], and bacteriophages [14, 95] has been explored to reduce Salmonella colonization. Vaccination strategies are also critical; dual Salmonella vaccination has been shown to attenuate microbiota dysbiosis and enhance microbiota functionality in challenged birds.

2.3 Avian Pathogenic Escherichia coli (APEC)

Avian pathogenic Escherichia coli (APEC) is a causative agent of colibacillosis in chickens, manifesting as respiratory infection, septicemia, and pericarditis [15, 86]. APEC is also a potential food safety concern, as contaminated carcasses can carry pathogenic strains into the food chain [16, 83]. The pathotype is defined by specific virulence factors including P-like fimbrial (PLF) adhesins, which mediate host-range specificity and zoonotic potential [17]. Genomic characterization of APEC strains from asymptomatic broilers in Thailand revealed fluoroquinolone-resistant clones [18]. In Uganda, Salmonella and pathogenic E. coli were co-isolated from broiler farms, with high levels of AMR. Escherichia coli O157:H7 has been detected in chicken livers, indicating a potential for foodborne transmission [16]. Commensal E. coli can also inhibit the growth and modulate the fitness of Salmonella Heidelberg, suggesting complex interactions within the gut microbiota.

2.4 Clostridium perfringens

Clostridium perfringens is an anaerobic, spore-forming Gram-positive bacillus that causes necrotic enteritis in broiler chickens, a disease with significant economic impact [19]. The bacterium produces potent toxins, including NetB and alpha-toxin, that destroy intestinal epithelial integrity. In the context of food poisoning, C. perfringens type A is a common cause of toxin-mediated gastroenteritis in humans, and chicken meat can serve as a vehicle. Phage-derived lysins (e.g., CP02) have been developed for biocontrol of C. perfringens in poultry meat [19]. Additionally, plant extract cocktails (star anise and thyme) show inhibitory effects against C. perfringens in chicken products.

2.5 Listeria monocytogenes

Listeria monocytogenes is a foodborne pathogen of particular concern for immunocompromised individuals and pregnant women. Poultry slaughtering and processing chains are known reservoirs; whole-genome sequencing has revealed transmission dynamics and persistence along these chains. Prevalence trends in poultry abattoirs in Taiwan from 2014 to 2024 indicate a stable but notable presence of L. monocytogenes. Cross-contamination during processing is a major risk factor.

2.6 Staphylococcus aureus

Staphylococcus aureus, including methicillin-resistant strains, is frequently isolated from chicken meat and liver [68, 78]. The organism can produce enterotoxins (e.g., toxic shock syndrome toxin-1, TSST-1) that cause food poisoning. Ready-to-eat chicken products are particularly vulnerable to contamination. Livestock-associated S. aureus lineages may carry AMR genes that can be transferred to humans.

2.7 Other Emerging Pathogens

Escherichia albertii has recently been recognized as an emerging attaching-and-effacing bacterial pathogen with zoonotic potential associated with poultry [45, 46]. Arcobacter butzleri, isolated from food processing plants, has been shown to alter gut microbiota in mice. Klebsiella pneumoniae hypervirulent and MDR strains have been found in pre-cooked chicken. Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Proteus mirabilis are also occasionally implicated [20, 50]. Enterococcus faecalis from broilers and handlers also shows AMR and genomic relatedness.

3. Clinical Syndromes in Chickens

The clinical presentation of bacterial infections in chickens depends on the pathogen, age of the bird, immune status, and management conditions. A summary of key syndromes is provided in Table 1.

Table 1: Major Bacterial Pathogens and Clinical Syndromes in Chickens

| Pathogen | Clinical Syndrome | Pathogenesis | Affected Age Group | |:-, |:-, |:-, |:-, | | Campylobacter jejuni/coli | Asymptomatic carriage; no overt disease | Colonization of cecal crypts, flagella-mediated adhesion, mild immune stimulation | All ages, but colonization increases with age | | Salmonella enterica serovars | Enteritis, septicemia, mortality in chicks; subclinical carrier in adults | T3SS effector injection, NLRP3 inflammasome activation, SIRT1 suppression of immunity | Young chicks (<2 weeks) most susceptible | | Avian Pathogenic E. coli (APEC) | Colibacillosis: airsacculitis, pericarditis, septicemia | Fimbrial adhesion, iron acquisition systems, serum resistance | Broilers 3-6 weeks | | Clostridium perfringens | Necrotic enteritis (acute or subclinical) | NetB and alpha-toxin production, intestinal dysbiosis, predisposing coccidiosis | Broilers 2-6 weeks | | Listeria monocytogenes | Subclinical carriage; rare clinical disease | Intracellular survival, crossing intestinal barrier; primarily a processing contaminant | All ages, no specific syndrome | | Staphylococcus aureus | Bumblefoot, osteomyelitis, septicemia | Toxin production, biofilm formation; can contaminate meat | Broilers, often secondary to immunosuppression |

The gastrointestinal tract is the primary site of interaction. Salmonella and E. coli can breach the mucosal barrier and cause systemic infection, while Campylobacter remains largely confined to the gut lumen. Tannic acid has been shown to mitigate Salmonella-induced lung injury via the gut-lung axis in broilers, highlighting systemic effects. The immune response to Campylobacter in broilers is characterized by a robust cytokine response in cecal tonsils, particularly upon repeated challenge. Host genetics also influence resistance; kinome analysis has been used to identify pathways involved in resistance to foodborne pathogens.

4. Public Health Implications

4.1 Zoonotic Transmission

Consumption of undercooked chicken meat and cross-contamination in domestic kitchens are the primary routes of human infection. The zoonotic potential of APEC is linked to PLF adhesin specificity [17]. Source attribution studies, such as the structured expert elicitation in the Netherlands, indicate that broiler meat is the dominant source of human campylobacteriosis and salmonellosis [1]. In Vietnam, high prevalence of Campylobacter and non-typhoidal Salmonella along the broiler production chain was found, emphasizing the need for interventions. Food workers can also be a transmission route: in Eastern Japan, Salmonella serovars and AMR profiles from food workers and livestock products overlapped, indicating bidirectional spread. In Ethiopia, MDR Salmonella from chickens, farmworkers, and environments supports a One Health perspective.

4.2 Antimicrobial Resistance

AMR is a critical concern in chicken-derived bacteria. Fluoroquinolone-resistant APEC from asymptomatic broilers in Thailand [18] and MDR Salmonella in Bangladesh, Korea, and South Africa are examples. Extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing E. coli from wet markets in Indonesia highlights environmental transmission. In Egypt, pan-drug-resistant Proteus mirabilis from livestock has been reported. A systematic review and meta-analysis of AMR in meat from Asia underscored the urgency of the issue. Recombinant LAB-based vaccines against Campylobacter may potentially promote a healthier gut microbial balance and reduce the need for antibiotics [21]. CRISPR-SeroSeq technology has been used for high-resolution detection of Salmonella serovar diversity in broilers, aiding surveillance [22].

4.3 Detection and Surveillance

Rapid detection methods are essential for food safety. PCR-enhanced fluorescence biosensors for Salmonella Typhimurium [23], smartphone-based aptasensors, gold nanoflower particle-based immunochromatographic assays, and one-step colorimetric immunosensing using magnetic nanobeads have been developed. Enrichment-free qPCR detection workflows have been optimized for poultry matrices [24]. Multiplex digital droplet PCR (ddPCR) tools can differentiate human and livestock contributions in wastewater-based surveillance. Whole-genome sequencing is increasingly used for genomic epidemiology of Salmonella in retail meats and Listeria in slaughterhouses. MALDI-TOF MS is used for identification of virulence genes in APEC.

5. Control Strategies

Control strategies in poultry production aim to reduce pathogen carriage at the farm level and prevent contamination during processing. Probiotics, competitive exclusion cultures [12, 13], and defined microbial consortia have shown efficacy. Bacteriophage-based interventions are gaining traction; phages targeting Campylobacter [25], Salmonella [14, 99], and C. perfringens [19] have been applied. Phage-loaded microneedle patches represent a novel decontamination approach. Essential oils and plant extracts (e.g., Houttuynia cordata targeting T3SS-1 [26], oregano, resveratrol, Maranta arundinacea) offer anti-virulence and antimicrobial effects. Postbiotics from E. coli and recombinant antimicrobial peptides are alternative strategies. Vaccination, both whole-cell killed and conjugate types [27], as well as subunit vaccines and egg yolk immunoglobulin Y, are used. Synbiotics and prebiotics such as chitosan nanoparticles also contribute to control. The role of feed additives (e.g., apidaecin, tannic acid) in reducing pathogen burden and improving intestinal health is well documented.

A Mermaid diagram summarizing the contamination route and control points is provided below.

flowchart TD
 A[Broiler farm , Colonized birds] --> B[Transport & lairage , Stress increases shedding]
 B --> C[Slaughter , Scalding, defeathering, evisceration]
 C --> D[Carcass chilling , Cross-contamination]
 D --> E[Processing & packaging]
 E --> F[Retail & storage]
 F --> G[Consumer handling & cooking]
 
 A -- Intervention --> H1[Probiotics, competitive exclusion, vaccines]
 C -- Intervention --> H2[Phage sprays, chemical decontamination]
 F -- Intervention --> H3[Irradiation, antimicrobial packaging]
 G -- Intervention --> H4[Proper cooking, hygiene education]

6. Conclusion

Chicken meat and eggs are central to global protein supply but also serve as major vehicles for bacterial foodborne pathogens. The most prominent agents, Campylobacter and Salmonella, are carried asymptomatically in poultry and contaminate products at multiple points along the production chain. The emergence of multidrug-resistant strains, including ESBL-producing E. coli and MDR Salmonella Infantis, poses a serious threat to both veterinary and public health. Integrated control measures, including biosecurity, vaccination, probiotic and phage interventions, and improved diagnostic surveillance, are essential to mitigate risks. A One Health approach that coordinates veterinary, environmental, and human health sectors is imperative for sustainable reduction of chicken-associated bacterial food poisoning.

References

[1] Wijnen LI, Nane GF, Benincà E, et al. Source attribution of foodborne pathogens in the Netherlands using structured expert elicitation. Int J Food Microbiol. 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41849915/

[2] Zarea AAK, Iulietto MF, Mandel T, et al. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on Campylobacter Species Prevalence in Chicken in Italy. Vet Med Sci. 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42030436/

[3] Zhang P, Liu Y, Wang B, et al. Trends, antimicrobial resistance, and source attribution of Campylobacter jejuni and C. coli in Beijing: An 8-year molecular surveillance study. J Infect. 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41831655/

[4] Ye X, Fugate H, Beck CN, et al. Research note: Temporal and tissue-specific immune responses to Campylobacter jejuni colonization in broiler chickens. Poult Sci. 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41653627/

[5] Xiang DF, Narindoshvili T, Raushel FM. Elucidation of the Pathway for the Biosynthesis of the Undecorated Capsular Polysaccharide from the HS:19 Serotype of the Human Pathogen Campylobacter jejuni. Biochemistry. 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42241030/

[6] Lee JB, Lim JH, Park JH, et al. Serotype distribution, genotype, and antimicrobial resistance profiles of Salmonella enterica isolated from retail chicken meat in South Korea. Food Sci Anim Resour. 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41849040/

[7] Liu F, Zhang L, Shen Q, et al. Fifty years of chicken-source Salmonella in China: Evolutionary shifts in epidemiology, antimicrobial resistance, and genomic lineages.

[8] Thiers I, Lories B, Steenackers H. In vivo models to study gastrointestinal Salmonella infections. Gut Microbes. 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41986923/

[9] El-Shall NA, Adiguzel MC, Abd El-Ghany WA, et al. Salmonella infection in chickens: pathogen, pathogenesis, and dietary non-drug feed additives as alternatives to antibiotics - a comprehensive review. Folia Microbiol (Praha). 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41762430/

[10] Liu S, Gao Q, Zhang J, et al. SIRT1 Attenuates Host Resistance to Salmonella Infection by Negatively Regulating the Immune Responses. FASEB J. 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42033180/

[11] Cartelo LA, Salhi O, Boumahdi Merad Z, et al. Occurrence, antimicrobial resistance and molecular characterization of Salmonella spp. from broiler chickens in Northern Algeria. Braz J Microbiol. 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42149349/

[12] Peruzzo A, Tiengo A, Furlan M, et al. Competitive exclusion modulates broiler microbiota structure and microbial interaction networks. Poult Sci. 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42061253/

[13] Kolososki IMM, Benevides VP, Rodrigues HLS, et al. Competitive exclusion strategies using healthy caecal microbiota impair Salmonella enterica serovars colonization in broilers. Avian Pathol. 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41784215/

[14] Gao D, Hu D, Xu H, et al. A phage cocktail targeting multiple receptors reduces Salmonella Enteritidis colonization in chicks and modulates the cecal microbiome. Vet Microbiol. 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41905017/

[15] Gaonkar PP, Golden R, Santana-Pereira ALR, et al. Genomic characterization of avian pathogenic Escherichia coli and its potential as a marker organism for antimicrobial resistance. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42080571/

[16] Dahmani K, Dhawi A, Saad M, et al. Prevalence of Escherichia coli O157:H7 in chicken livers. Open Vet J. 2025. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41630711/

[17] Akrami F, Jamali H, Houle S, et al. Host range and zoonotic potential linked to P-like fimbrial (PLF) adhesin specificity in avian pathogenic Escherichia coli. PLoS Pathog. 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41941531/

[18] Yongyod R, Eiamsam-Ang T, Kamolrat N, et al. Fluoroquinolone-Resistant Avian Pathogenic Escherichia coli Isolated from Asymptomatic Broiler Chickens in a Slaughterhouse in Northern Thailand. Pathogens. 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41901706/

[19] Zhou Y, Kang H, Qin L, et al. A novel broad-spectrum phage lysin CP02 for biocontrol of Clostridium perfringens in poultry meat. Curr Res Food Sci. 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41884577/

[20] Mousa WS, Abdeen EE, El-Gendy HF, et al. Prevalence and genotyping of Pseudomonas aeruginosa from food and human sources. Sci Rep. 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41702978/

[21] Biswas P, Ahmed S, Mondal S, et al. Recombinant LAB vector-based multicomponent vaccine against Campylobacter jejuni potentially promoting a healthier microbial balance in the poultry gut. Microbiome. 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42098871/

[22] Vinueza-Burgos C, Medina-Santana JL, de Janon S, et al. Research note: High-resolution detection of Salmonella serovar diversity in broilers from Ecuador using CRISPR-SeroSeq. Poult Sci. 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41643441/

[23] Han L, Chen M, Huang Q, et al. A PCR-enhanced UCNPs-WS(2) fluorescence biosensor via dual quenching-dual recovery mechanism for rapid detection of Salmonella typhimurium. Food Res Int. 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42083239/

[24] Nyarku R, Kuufire E, Bentum KE, et al. Optimizing Lysis and Extraction Workflows for Enrichment-Free qPCR Detection of Salmonella enterica in Poultry Matrices. Pathogens. 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41754481/

[25] Rafiq MS, Haider SS, Li Z, et al. The role of Campylobacter group II phages in mitigating Campylobacter contamination across the poultry food chain: Current applications and future prospects. Food Res Int. 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42169327/

[26] Wang T, Cai S, Zhang J, et al. Houttuynia cordata extract protects against Salmonella infection by targeting type III secretion system 1. Poult Sci. 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42025005/

[27] Ahmad A, Yousaf Z, Naeem M, et al. Preparation and comparative evaluation of conjugate and whole-cell killed vaccine candidates against Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium. Vaccine. 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42090745/

[28] Fornal E, Pękala A, Łaszkiewicz M, et al. The phage for PPLA age: effective method for Salmonella-free poultry feed. Microbiol Spectr. 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41677261/

Disclaimer: This article is for educational and informational purposes only. It is not intended to substitute for professional veterinary advice, diagnosis, treatment, or regulatory guidance. Always consult a licensed veterinarian or qualified specialist regarding animal health, disease diagnosis, and therapeutic decisions.