Bacterial Pathogens in Poultry Feces: Implications for Flock Health and Biosecurity

Introduction

Poultry feces represent a complex biological matrix that harbors a diverse community of microorganisms, including commensal gut flora and potentially pathogenic bacterial species [1]. The microbial composition of fecal material in chickens is shaped by multiple factors: diet, age, housing system, antimicrobial exposure, and host genetics [2, 1]. Understanding the bacterial pathogens shed in poultry excreta is critical for managing flock health, implementing effective biosecurity protocols, and mitigating the spread of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) determinants within and between production systems [3, 4, 5].

The term chicken feces bacteria encompasses a wide breadth of taxa, including members of the Enterobacteriaceae family, Campylobacteraceae, Clostridiaceae, and Enterococcaceae, among others [6, 1]. Fecal shedding of pathogenic bacteria can occur in clinically healthy birds (carrier state) or in birds exhibiting overt clinical disease [7, 8]. The implications for flock health are profound, as fecally shed pathogens can contaminate feed, water, litter, and equipment, thereby propagating infection through horizontal transmission routes [9]. This article provides an exhaustive review of the bacterial pathogens commonly identified in poultry feces, their etiological and epidemiological features, clinical and pathological outcomes, diagnostic approaches, therapeutic considerations, and biosecurity control measures.

Etiology and Major Bacterial Pathogens in Poultry Feces

Salmonella enterica Serovars

Salmonella enterica remains one of the most extensively studied bacterial pathogens in poultry feces [2, 10, 7, 11, 12, 8]. Multiple serovars, including Salmonella Typhimurium and Salmonella Enteritidis, colonize the avian intestinal tract and are shed in high numbers in the feces of both symptomatic and asymptomatic carrier birds [2, 11]. The phenomenon of super-shedding, where certain birds excrete exceptionally high concentrations of Salmonella, has been associated with distinct gut microbiota signatures [2]. In a study by Liu et al., broiler chickens that developed super-shedder status for Salmonella Typhimurium exhibited altered microbial community structures, including reduced abundances of butyrate-producing bacteria, which permitted enhanced pathogen proliferation [2].

Salmonella Pullorum and Salmonella Gallinarum are host-restricted serovars that cause pullorum disease and fowl typhoid, respectively [13, 11]. These pathogens are shed in feces during acute and chronic phases of infection and can be transmitted vertically through the egg, making detection in fecal samples a critical component of eradication programs [8]. The genomic landscape of understudied Salmonella serovars from poultry has been elucidated through whole-genome sequencing, revealing virulence factors and AMR genes that facilitate persistence in the avian host [12, 8].

Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli

Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli are thermophilic, microaerophilic bacteria that colonize the cecal and colonic mucosa of broiler and layer chickens [14, 15, 16]. Fecal shedding of Campylobacter is a primary source of flock-to-flock transmission and environmental contamination [15]. An 8-year molecular surveillance study in Beijing demonstrated high prevalence and diverse sequence types of C. jejuni and C. coli in poultry sources, with significant AMR trends observed over the surveillance period [14]. In Egypt, molecular detection of antibiotic-resistant Campylobacter spp. among broiler and layer flocks confirmed that fecal samples are reliable matrices for monitoring AMR patterns in Campylobacter populations [16]. Meta-analytical data indicate that interventions targeting fecal contamination, such as improved hygiene barriers and feed additives, can substantially reduce Campylobacter carriage in poultry [15].

Escherichia coli and Other Enterobacteriaceae

Escherichia coli is a ubiquitous inhabitant of the avian gastrointestinal tract, but certain pathotypes, including avian pathogenic Escherichia coli (APEC), are responsible for colibacillosis, a major cause of morbidity and mortality in poultry [17, 18, 19]. Fecal shedding of APEC strains contributes to environmental contamination and horizontal spread within flocks [18]. Extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) producing E. coli have been isolated from poultry feces and from poultry farm workers in Accra, Ghana, indicating a shared resistance pool between avian and human populations [18]. Similarly, beta-lactamase producing E. coli have been detected in migratory geese, highlighting the role of wild birds as vectors for AMR genes [19].

Other members of the Enterobacteriaceae family, such as Klebsiella pneumoniae, are also shed in poultry feces. Colistin-resistant, hypervirulent K. pneumoniae strains of chicken origin have been characterized, harboring AMR genes including mcr-8.2 on conjugative plasmids [20, 21]. These isolates pose a dual threat: virulence for avian hosts and a reservoir for transferable resistance determinants [20]. Additionally, Escherichia albertii and Escherichia fergusonii have been isolated from healthy farm animals in Japan, expanding the range of Escherichia species that may be shed in poultry feces [17].

Clostridium perfringens

Clostridium perfringens is a Gram-positive, spore-forming anaerobe that is a normal inhabitant of the poultry gut but can act as an opportunistic pathogen [22]. Type A and Type C strains producing alpha toxin and NetB toxin are implicated in necrotic enteritis, a disease characterized by extensive intestinal necrosis and high mortality in broiler flocks [22]. Fecal shedding of C. perfringens increases markedly during clinical outbreaks, and spores persist in litter and the environment [22]. In vaccinated broiler flocks, dynamics of C. perfringens and Eimeria co-infections were shown to shift following the phase-out of ionophore anticoccidials, with implications for necrotic enteritis risk [22].

Enterococcus Species

Enterococci, including Enterococcus faecalis, Enterococcus faecium, and Enterococcus asini, are frequently isolated from poultry feces [23, 24, 25]. These organisms are indicators of fecal contamination and serve as reservoirs for AMR genes, including linezolid resistance determinants such as optrA and poxtA [23]. In Punjab, India, genomic profiling of E. faecalis isolates from broilers and their handlers revealed shared resistance and virulence gene repertoires, suggesting bidirectional transmission between birds and humans [24]. Phenotypic characterization of antibiotic resistant Enterococcus species from chicken fecal samples in Ghana showed high levels of resistance to tetracycline and erythromycin, with multidrug resistance prevalent [25].

Gallibacterium anatis

Gallibacterium anatis is an emerging bacterial pathogen in poultry and pet birds [26]. Colonization of the upper respiratory and reproductive tracts can lead to septicemia, and biofilm formation contributes to treatment failure and persistence [26]. Fecal shedding of G. anatis has been documented, and the organism can contaminate the environment, making biosecurity measures essential for control [26].

Brachyspira Species

Brachyspira spp., including Brachyspira pilosicoli and Brachyspira intermedia, colonize the cecum and colon of chickens, causing intestinal spirochetosis [27]. These bacteria are shed in feces and influence the transcriptional regulation of intestinal immune markers in laying hens [27]. Differences in immune gene expression have been observed between conventional and organic production systems, correlating with Brachyspira load in fecal samples [27].

Other Bacterial Pathogens

Morganella morganii, harboring novel fosfomycin resistance determinants such as FosA13, has been recovered from poultry feces [28]. Likewise, house flies (Musca domestica) collected from broiler farms carry Salmonella enterica in their intestinal tracts, demonstrating that flies serve as mechanical vectors transporting fecal pathogens from contaminated litter to feed and water sources [9].

Epidemiology and Shedding Dynamics

The epidemiology of bacterial pathogens in poultry feces is influenced by production system type, biosecurity level, and flock management practices [7, 15, 1]. In small-scale and free-range systems, the prevalence of pathogens such as Salmonella spp. is often higher than in intensive commercial operations due to reduced biosecurity [7, 29]. A study in Burkina Faso reported household-level risk factors for Salmonella infection in chickens, including free-range scavenging and lack of veterinary oversight [7]. In forest farm free-range systems in Gansu Province, China, high prevalence of pathogenic bacteria was observed in clinical samples from chickens, with significant AMR patterns [29].

Metagenomic and 16S rRNA gene based approaches have provided high-resolution insights into the fecal microbiota of poultry [1]. In Pakistan, the fecal microbiota landscape of commercial poultry farms revealed a predominance of Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, and Proteobacteria, with pathogen loads varying by farm management [1]. Competitive exclusion strategies using healthy cecal microbiota have been shown to impair S. enterica colonization in broilers, suggesting that manipulation of the fecal microbial community can reduce pathogen shedding [10].

Clinical Signs and Pathological Manifestations

Many bacterial pathogens shed in poultry feces cause clinical disease when birds are exposed to high infectious doses or when predisposing factors (e.g., immunosuppression, co-infection, stress) are present [13, 22, 29]. Salmonella Typhimurium and Enteritidis infections in young chicks result in septicemia, diarrhea, and high mortality [11]. Adult birds may exhibit decreased egg production, poor feed conversion, and persistent fecal shedding [11]. Salmonella Gallinarum and Pullorum infections cause fowl typhoid and pullorum disease, respectively, with clinical signs including lethargy, white diarrhea, and hepatosplenomegaly [13].

Campylobacter jejuni colonization in broilers is typically subclinical, but heavy intestinal loads contribute to fecal contamination of carcasses during slaughter [14, 15]. In laying hens, Campylobacter infection has been associated with spotty liver disease and reduced egg production [16]. Clostridium perfringens overgrowth in the small intestine, often triggered by coccidiosis, leads to necrotic enteritis characterized by sudden death, depression, and dark, foul-smelling diarrhea [22].

Escherichia coli infections can manifest as colibacillosis, with airsacculitis, pericarditis, and perihepatitis observed post-mortem [18, 19]. Klebsiella pneumoniae strains of avian origin can cause respiratory signs and septicemia, particularly in layer flocks [20, 21].

Pathogenesis and Host-Pathogen Interactions

The molecular mechanisms by which pathogens colonize the avian gastrointestinal tract and are shed in feces involve adhesion, invasion, toxin production, and immune evasion [30, 11, 5]. Salmonella Typhimurium uses type III secretion systems to inject effector proteins into host cells, facilitating invasion of intestinal epithelial cells and survival within macrophages [11]. Gene loss of respiratory requirements has been observed in Salmonella Typhimurium and Enteritidis during chicken infection, indicating metabolic adaptation to the host environment [11].

Propionate, a short-chain fatty acid produced by the gut microbiota, suppresses Salmonella virulence gene expression via the LuxS quorum sensing system [30]. This microbiota-derived metabolite downregulates the expression of Salmonella pathogenicity island 1 (SPI-1) genes, reducing invasion capacity [30]. Conversely, disruption of the gut microbiota through antimicrobial use can reduce propionate levels and increase susceptibility to Salmonella colonization [30].

Enterococcus faecalis and E. faecium produce enterocins and other bacteriocins that can modulate the gut microbiota [24]. Antibiotic resistance genes in Enterococcus are often located on mobile genetic elements, enabling horizontal gene transfer to other Gram-positive bacteria within the fecal environment [23, 24].

Diagnostic Approaches for Fecal Pathogens

Detection and enumeration of bacterial pathogens in poultry feces rely on culture-based methods, molecular diagnostics, and metagenomic sequencing [2, 3, 6, 5, 1]. Culture methods involve selective enrichment (e.g., Rappaport-Vassiliadis broth for Salmonella) followed by plating on chromogenic or differential agar [7, 9]. Quantitative culture on selective media (e.g., modified charcoal cefoperazone deoxycholate agar for Campylobacter) allows determination of colony-forming units per gram of feces [14, 15].

Molecular detection using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and quantitative PCR (qPCR) provides rapid, sensitive detection of specific pathogen genes [26, 16]. Multiplex PCR panels can simultaneously identify Salmonella, Campylobacter, and E. coli from fecal samples [16]. Real-time qPCR targeting the invA gene for Salmonella or the hipO gene for Campylobacter jejuni is widely used in diagnostic laboratories [14, 16].

Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) and metagenomic shotgun sequencing offer comprehensive profiling of the fecal resistome and pathogenome [3, 6, 5, 1]. Metagenomic analysis of animal feces in Indiana identified diverse enteric bacterial, viral, and parasitic pathogen genes, demonstrating the utility of shotgun sequencing for pathogen surveillance [6]. Metagenomic approaches also enable tracking of horizontal gene transfer events and mobile resistance elements within poultry farm environments [4, 5, 31].

The following table summarizes common diagnostic methods for detecting bacterial pathogens in poultry feces:

A decision tree for diagnostic workflow is presented below:

graph TD
    A["Fecal Sample Collection (cloacal swab, fresh droppings)"], > B["Initial Processing: Homogenization in PBS or Buffered Peptone Water"]
    B, > C["Selective Pre-enrichment (e.g., BPW for Salmonella, 37°C, 24h)"]
    C, > D{"Pathogen of Interest?"}
    D, "Salmonella", > E["Enrichment in RV broth (42°C, 24h)"]
    D, "Campylobacter", > F["Microaerobic incubation on mCCDA (42°C, 48h)"]
    D, "Generic Enterobacteriaceae", > G["Plating on MacConkey agar (37°C, 24h)"]
    E, > H["Plating on XLD or Chromogenic agar (37°C, 24h)"]
    H, > I["Biochemical confirmation (TSI, LIA, urease)"]
    I, > J["Serotyping or WGS for serovar identification"]
    F, > K["Colony morphology, Gram stain, oxidase positive"]
    K, > L["PCR for hipO or cdt genes"]
    G, > M["Indole test, IMViC, or MALDI-TOF identification"]
    M, > N["Antimicrobial susceptibility testing (disk diffusion or broth microdilution)"]
    J, > O["Report: Pathogen ID, AMR profile, serovar"]
    L, > O
    N, > O

Antimicrobial Resistance and Treatment Considerations

Antimicrobial resistance among bacterial pathogens isolated from poultry feces is a growing concern [3, 21, 4, 24, 32, 25, 31]. Resistance to critically important antimicrobials, including colistin, linezolid, fosfomycin, and third-generation cephalosporins, has been documented in various avian bacterial isolates [23, 20, 21, 24, 28, 19]. The emergence of linezolid resistance genes optrA and poxtA in avian Enterococcus asini highlights the potential for resistance dissemination through the poultry fecal reservoir [23]. Similarly, the detection of mcr-8.2 positive Klebsiella pneumoniae from layer chickens underscores the persistence of plasmid-mediated colistin resistance in poultry populations [21].

Horizontal gene transfer of conjugative antibiotic resistant plasmids occurs at high frequency in livestock and poultry manure, facilitating the spread of resistance genes among Enterobacteriaceae [31]. Metagenomic analysis of small-scale poultry and cattle farms has revealed complex resistome profiles, with multidrug resistance gene clusters shared between animal and environmental compartments [3].

Treatment of bacterial infections in poultry must be guided by antimicrobial susceptibility testing to minimize further selection for resistance [33]. Non-E. coli Enterobacteriaceae isolated from food animals in Cameroon demonstrated high levels of resistance to commonly used antibiotics, emphasizing the need for alternative therapeutic strategies [33]. Phage therapy has emerged as a novel strategy to combat drug resistant Salmonella Pullorum infection in chickens, showing efficacy in reducing fecal shedding and mortality [13]. Competitive exclusion products, probiotics such as Lactobacillus strains selected from native chicken feces, and fermentation products of Saccharomyces cerevisiae have been evaluated as alternatives to antibiotics for reducing Salmonella colonization and improving gut health [34, 35].

Biosecurity and Control Measures

Biosecurity on poultry farms is the primary defense against the introduction and spread of bacterial pathogens shed in feces [15, 9]. Key biosecurity measures include strict control of personnel and equipment movement, dedicated footwear and clothing for each house, and regular cleaning and disinfection of feeders, drinkers, and litter [15]. House fly control is critical, as flies can transport Salmonella enterica from contaminated feces to feed [9]. The effectiveness of interventions and control measures in reducing Campylobacter in poultry farms has been quantified in a comprehensive meta-analysis, with combined biosecurity and feed additive approaches showing the greatest reduction [15].

Litter management is particularly important for controlling Clostridium perfringens and Salmonella [10, 22]. Removal of wet litter reduces the survival of pathogens and minimizes the risk of coccidiosis, which predisposes birds to necrotic enteritis [22]. All-in/all-out production, with thorough cleaning and disinfection between flocks, helps break the cycle of fecal-oral transmission [10].

Vaccination programs for Salmonella, E. coli, and Clostridium perfringens are available and can reduce fecal shedding of these pathogens [13, 22]. For example, live attenuated Salmonella vaccines decrease colonization and shedding of field strains in vaccinated flocks [13]. Competitive exclusion of Salmonella using defined bacterial consortia or undefined cecal microbiota has been shown to reduce fecal shedding and internal organ colonization in broilers [10].

Summary

Bacterial pathogens present in poultry feces represent a complex and dynamic challenge to flock health and biosecurity. Key pathogens including Salmonella enterica, Campylobacter jejuni, Escherichia coli, Clostridium perfringens, Enterococcus spp., Klebsiella pneumoniae, Gallibacterium anatis, and Brachyspira spp. are shed in fecal material and can cause clinical disease under conducive conditions. Surveillance of chicken feces bacteria using culture-based and molecular diagnostic methods is essential for early detection and implementation of control measures. The rising prevalence of antimicrobial resistance in poultry fecal pathogens necessitates judicious antimicrobial use and the adoption of alternative control strategies, including phage therapy, probiotics, and competitive exclusion. Comprehensive biosecurity protocols remain the cornerstone of preventing pathogen introduction and inter-flock transmission.

References

[1] Khan MM, Mushtaq MA, Suleman M et al. Fecal microbiota landscape of commercial poultry farms in Faisalabad, Pakistan: A 16S rRNA gene-based metagenomics study. Poult Sci. 2025.

[2] Liu Y, Meng L, Wang Y et al. Gut microbiota signatures associated with the development of Salmonella Typhimurium super-shedders in broiler chickens. Poult Sci. 2026.

[3] Ayilaran E, Kilonzo-Nthenge A. Metagenomic Insights into Antimicrobial Resistance in Small-Scale Poultry and Cattle Farms. Microorganisms. 2026.

[4] Yang J, Wang L, Liang Q et al. Microbiome, resistome, and potential transfer of antibiotic resistance genes in Chinese wet market under One Health sectors. BMC Microbiol. 2025.

[5] Napit R, Gurung A, Poudel A et al. Metagenomic analysis of human, animal, and environmental samples identifies potential emerging pathogens, profiles antibiotic resistance genes, and reveals horizontal gene transfer dynamics. Sci Rep. 2025.

[6] Heintzman AA, Keenum I, Capone D. Diverse enteric bacterial, viral, and parasitic pathogen genes are shed in animal feces in Indiana. PLoS One. 2026.

[7] Tiendrébéogo WPB, Kagambèga A, Moodley A et al. Prevalence, quantification, and household-level risk factors associated with Salmonella spp. infection in chickens in Boussouma commune, Burkina Faso. BMC Microbiol. 2026.

[8] Jiang X, Siddique A, Zhu L et al. Ecological prevalence and genomic characterization of Salmonella isolated from selected poultry farms in Jiangxi province, China. Poult Sci. 2025.

[9] Zwally KM, Holda

[10] Kolososki IMM, Benevides VP, Rodrigues HLS et al. Competitive exclusion strategies utilizing healthy caecal microbiota impair Salmonella enterica serovars colonization in broilers. Avian Pathol. 2026.

[11] Monte DFM, Saraiva MMS, Cabrera JM et al. Revisiting the gene loss of respiratory requirements for Salmonella Typhimurium and Salmonella Enteritidis in the chicken infection model. Braz J Microbiol. 2025.

[12] Benevides VP, Saraiva MMS, Ferreira VA et al. Unveiling the Genomic Landscape of Understudied Salmonella enterica Serovars from Poultry and Human: Implications for Food Safety. Curr Microbiol. 2025.

[13] Zhao H, You S, Fu J et al. Phage therapy: A novel strategy to combat drug-resistant Salmonella Pullorum infection in chickens. Vet Microbiol. 2026.

[14] Zhang P, Liu Y, Wang B et al. Trends, antimicrobial resistance, and source attribution of Campylobacter jejuni and C. coli in Beijing: An 8-year molecular surveillance study. J Infect. 2026.

[15] Zefanias O, Gonzales-Barron U, Cadavez V. Effectiveness of Interventions and Control Measures in the Reduction of Campylobacter in Poultry Farms: A Comprehensive Meta-Analysis. Foods. 2026.

[16] Shaheed I, Samir A, Ismael E et al. Molecular detection of antibiotic-resistant Campylobacter spp. among broiler and layer chickens in Egypt: An outlook from a One Health concept. Res Vet Sci. 2025.

[17] Momoki A, Tamamura-Andoh Y, Ooka T et al. Prevalence and characteristics of Escherichia albertii and Escherichia fergusonii isolates from healthy farm animals in Japan. J Vet Med Sci. 2026.

[18] Okyere IJ, Semevor GO, Ablordey A et al. Genomic profiling of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli isolated from poultry and poultry farm workers in Accra, Ghana. Sci Rep. 2026.

[19] Tasnim Y, Rahman MK, Abdul-Hamid C et al. Beta-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli in migratory geese at West Texas recreational parks. Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis. 2025.

[20] Xu Q, Zhu Y, Schwarz S et al. Characterization of a ST412-K57 colistin-resistant hypervirulent Klebsiella pneumoniae strain of chicken origin. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2026.

[21] Tian R, Yang M, Yang Y et al. Emergence and genomic characterization of mcr-8.2-positive Klebsiella pneumoniae from layer chickens in Xinjiang, China. Poult Sci. 2026.

[22] Estensmo EL, Granstad S, Stevens KB et al. A new era of coccidiosis control: Eimeria and Clostridium perfringens dynamics in vaccinated broiler flocks after the ionophore phase-out in Norway. Prev Vet Med. 2026.

[23] Li Y, Tang H, Chen Y et al. Emergence of Linezolid Resistance Genes optrA and poxtA in an Avian Enterococcus asini. Int J Mol Sci. 2026. DOI: 10.3390/ijms42123305.

[24] Parmar N, Singh R, Tyagi A et al. Antimicrobial Resistance and Genomic Insights into Enterococcus faecalis Isolates from Broilers and Their Handlers in Punjab, India. Foodborne Pathog Dis. 2026.

[25] Asumang P, Amoakohene F, Amponsah C et al. Prevalence and Phenotypic Characterization of Antibiotic-resistant Enterococcus Species Isolated from Chicken Faecal Samples in Accra, Ghana. Ethiop J Health Sci. 2024.

[26] Nofouzi K, Shakeri S, Nikkhah S et al. Gallibacterium anatis as an emerging pathogen in pet birds: biofilm formation contributes to treatment challenges and persistence. BMC Microbiol. 2025.

[27] Arechavaleta NN, Breyer GM, Siqueira FM. Brachyspira spp. influences transcriptional regulation of intestinal immune markers in laying hens from conventional and organic production systems. Br Poult Sci. 2026.

[28] Zhang R, Yu Y, Huang L et al. Characterization of FosA13, a novel fosfomycin glutathione transferase identified in a Morganella morganii isolate from poultry. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2025.

[29] Egide H, Zhang J, Wang L et al. Prevalence of pathogenic bacteria and their antimicrobial patterns analysis of clinical samples from free-range chickens raised in forest farms in Zhouqu county of Gansu Province, China. Poult Sci. 2025.

[30] Zhang Q, Zhu Q, Xiao Y et al. Microbiota-derived propionate suppresses Salmonella virulence gene expression via LuxS quorum sensing. Microbiome. 2026.

[31] Li Y, Shen L, Gao HZ et al. Contamination of Conjugative Antibiotic-resistant Plasmids in Large-scale Livestock and Poultry Manure and Their Occurrence Characteristics of Antibiotic Resistance Gene. Huan Jing Ke Xue. 2025.

[32] Feng Y, Li T, Zhao S et al. Genetic characterization and transmission of the multidrug resistance gene cfr in fecal and environmental pathways on a chicken farm in China. Poult Sci. 2025.

[33] Ndialle CE, Nyincho MM, Eyong M et al. Resistance Profiling of Predominant Non-E. coli Enterobacteriaceae Isolated From Humans, Food Animals, and the Environment in the Fako Division of Cameroon. Biomed Res Int. 2025.

[34] Chao NV, Phung LD, Dung HT et al. Effect of Feeding a Saccharomyces cerevisiae Fermentation Product on Pathogenic and Antibiotic Resistance Bacteria in Crossbred F(1) (Luong Phuong x Ri) Broiler Chickens in the Production Systems With Low Biosecurity (Sector 3). Anim Sci J. 2025.

[35] Hai PV, Phuong HTA, Hung PHS et al. Selection of Lactobacillus strains from native chicken feces for the fermentation of purple onion (Allium cepa L.) as an antibiotic alternative against Salmonella spp. in chickens. Open Vet J. 2024.