Bacterial Pathogens in Poultry: Comprehensive Guide to Chicken-Associated Bacteria, Food Safety, and Human Health Implications

Introduction

Poultry production supports a significant proportion of global animal protein supply, yet bacterial pathogens associated with chickens represent a persistent challenge to flock health and food safety. The term "chicken ka bacteria" colloquially refers to the diverse microbial community that can colonize or contaminate poultry tissues, including both primary pathogens causing avian disease and zoonotic agents of public health concern. Understanding these agents requires a detailed appraisal of their etiologic characteristics, epidemiological patterns, virulence mechanisms, and interactions with the host and the food chain. This article provides a clinical-grade, research-oriented review of the major bacterial pathogens in chickens, with emphasis on food safety and the regulatory framework such as FSIS poultry Salmonella standards, while drawing exclusively on recent peer-reviewed evidence from the literature provided.

Major Bacterial Pathogens of Poultry

Salmonella enterica

Salmonella remains the most extensively studied bacterial pathogen in poultry. The genus includes host-restricted serovars such as Salmonella Gallinarum and Pullorum, which cause fowl typhoid and pullorum disease respectively, as well as broad-host-range serovars like Salmonella Enteritidis and Salmonella Typhimurium that are frequently implicated in foodborne outbreaks [1, 2]. A persistent consumer question is "does all chicken have salmonella?" While not every carcass harbors Salmonella, retail surveys consistently report prevalence ranging from 10% to 60% depending on region and production system [3, 33]. The question "salmonella chicken only" is misleading because Salmonella is also carried by other livestock, but poultry is a predominant reservoir for human salmonellosis.

Virulence gene profiling of Salmonella from hatchery environments reveals extensive carriage of class 1 integrons in extensively drug-resistant (XDR) strains, highlighting the role of vertical transmission from breeder flocks to progeny [1]. In Bangladesh, combined phenotypic and molecular characterization of Salmonella Gallinarum-Pullorum demonstrated high resistance to fluoroquinolones and third-generation cephalosporins, complicating therapeutic options [2]. Detection of viable but nonculturable (VBNC) Salmonella in retail meat using optimized PMAxx real-time PCR shows that conventional culture may underestimate the true contamination burden [3]. A novel indirect ELISA based on the Sptp protein offers a serological screening tool for Salmonella infection in poultry flocks [4]. Organic acids, such as those studied in the context of the chicken macrophage-like HD11 cell line, can impede Salmonella infection by modulating itaconate gene expression [35].

For further detail, refer to the dedicated guide on Salmonella in Poultry.

Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli

Campylobacter species, particularly C. jejuni and C. coli, are thermophilic, microaerophilic pathogens that colonize the chicken intestinal tract without causing clinical disease in the bird but represent a leading cause of human gastroenteritis. Contamination of broiler chicken meat is a major transmission route [5, 6, 7]. A study in Isfahan, Iran, reported high Campylobacter contamination of broiler carcasses with frequent resistance to tetracycline and ciprofloxacin [5]. Experimental infection of laying hens with C. coli and C. jejuni demonstrated prolonged shedding and colonization of internal organs including the liver and spleen [7]. Genomic insights into C. jejuni from a global One Health perspective reveal complex lineages, virulence gene repertoires, and antimicrobial resistance determinants shared between poultry and human isolates [6]. In Estonia, genomic associations between broiler chicken meat isolates and human campylobacteriosis cases underscore the importance of poultry as a source [8]. The biosynthetic pathway of the capsular polysaccharide in C. jejuni HS:19 serotype has been elucidated, providing molecular targets for vaccine development [9]. In Algeria, poultry meat isolates show high genetic diversity and the presence of virulence-associated genes such as cdtB and flaA [32].

For further information, see the article on Campylobacter jejuni in Poultry.

Escherichia coli

Avian pathogenic Escherichia coli (APEC) is the causative agent of colibacillosis, a multifactorial disease presenting as respiratory infection, septicemia, and peritonitis [10, 11, 12, 13]. The question "chicken e coli or salmonella" often arises when differentiating foodborne illness; both pathogens can contaminate raw poultry, but E. coli (particularly atypical enteropathogenic E. coli, aEPEC) is also prevalent on retail chicken meat [33]. In Vietnam, a high prevalence of aEPEC contaminating chicken meat was found, with virulence gene profiles including eae and stx-negative variants and multidrug resistance [33]. The LuxS-mediated quorum-sensing system facilitates environmental adaptability and competitive capability of APEC [10]. The quorum-sensing regulator LsrR modulates oxidative stress resistance by interfering with sulfate assimilation [13]. Direct interaction between APEC and H9N2 avian influenza virus promotes bacterial adhesion during co-infections [12]. The ecnAB toxin-antitoxin system modulates APEC virulence by regulating capsular sialic acid biosynthesis [34]. Herbal combinations, such as Ilex rotunda-Cyperus rotundus extract, show preventive effects against avian colibacillosis in chickens [11]. Reverse vaccinology and machine learning approaches have identified candidate antigens for epitope-based vaccines against APEC [14].

For a comprehensive review, see Avian Colibacillosis.

Clostridium perfringens

Clostridium perfringens type G is the primary etiological agent of necrotic enteritis in chickens, a disease that causes significant economic losses [15, 16]. Spore-mediated persistence of C. perfringens in meat and poultry processing environments complicates sanitation efforts [15]. Toxinotyping of isolates from chickens with necrotic enteritis reveals the presence of NetB toxin and others [16]. Bacteriophage therapy represents a promising biocontrol strategy for reducing C. perfringens in poultry production [16].

Staphylococcus aureus and Coagulase-Negative Staphylococci

Staphylococcus aureus, including methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA), is a zoonotic pathogen found on poultry carcasses [17, 28]. A 12-year nationwide study in South Korea documented MRSA from livestock carcasses, including poultry, with molecular typing revealing clonal lineages of public health concern [17]. Phloretin, a plant-derived compound, interacts with S. aureus toxin proteins and has been applied to chicken meat to reduce toxin activity [28]. Coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) isolated from bone lesions in broiler chickens exhibit phenotypic and genotypic antimicrobial resistance, suggesting a role in lameness and osteomyelitis [18].

Listeria monocytogenes

Listeria monocytogenes is a psychrotrophic pathogen that can survive in refrigerated poultry products. Sous vide preservation of turkey meat with Rosmarinus officinalis essential oil demonstrated antibacterial effectiveness against L. monocytogenes and other microbiota [19].

Pseudomonas Species

Pseudomonas lundensis contributes to spoilage and biofilm formation on refrigerated poultry. Dehydroacetic acid disrupts cold adaptation and biofilm formation in P. lundensis, offering a targeted strategy to enhance microbiological safety [20].

Mycoplasma gallisepticum and Mycoplasma synoviae

Mycoplasma gallisepticum and M. synoviae are important respiratory pathogens in chickens. Sampling location and frequency significantly affect detection of M. gallisepticum in the respiratory tract of commercial layer pullets [21]. A novel therapeutic strategy for M. synoviae infection involves synergistic effects of tilmicosin and sinomenine [22].

Avibacterium paragallinarum

Avibacterium paragallinarum causes infectious coryza, an upper respiratory disease. Reverse vaccinology has identified candidate antigens for vaccine development [23]. Non-pathogenic isolates have been investigated for their protective potential against virulent strains [24].

Food Safety Implications of Poultry-Associated Bacteria

Prevalence on Raw Poultry

The pathogen most common in raw poultry meat is either Salmonella or Campylobacter, depending on the geographic region and sampling methodology [5, 3, 32, 33]. In retail chicken meat in Vietnam, a high prevalence of atypical enteropathogenic E. coli was documented, with 54% of samples positive [33]. The phrase "e coli on raw chicken" is justified, as E. coli is a routine indicator of fecal contamination. Simultaneously, "does all chicken have salmonella" cannot be answered affirmatively, but the proportion of contaminated samples often exceeds 20% in many surveys [3]. For "chicken neck bacteria", specific microbiological profiles of chicken neck skin samples often show higher loads of Enterobacteriaceae due to processing contamination.

Thermal Inactivation and the Question "Cooking Chicken Kill Bacteria"

Proper cooking unequivocally kills vegetative bacterial cells. The question "cooking chicken kill bacteria" is answered affirmatively when internal temperatures reach 73.9 degree Celsius (165 degree Fahrenheit). However, "reheat chicken kill bacteria" depends on the initial load and the presence of heat-stable toxins. Clostridium perfringens spores can survive initial cooking and germinate if cooling is inadequate; reheating may not inactivate spores [15]. Similarly, staphylococcal enterotoxins are heat-stable and not destroyed by reheating [28]. The question "does cooked chicken grow bacteria" is relevant when cooked chicken is left at ambient temperature; post-cooking contamination and temperature abuse allow bacterial growth, including psychrotrophic pathogens like Listeria [19]. Sous vide preservation at low temperatures can control some pathogens but requires validation [19].

Washing Risks: "Salmonella Chicken Washing"

Washing raw chicken is discouraged by FSIS poultry salmonella guidance because it can aerosolize bacteria and contaminate kitchen surfaces. This practice increases the risk of cross-contamination rather than reducing it. For further information, see the article on Salmonella in Poultry: Food Safety, Washing, and Risks for Infants.

Toxin Production

"Chicken bacteria toxins" include heat-stable enterotoxins of S. aureus, enterotoxins of C. perfringens (NetB, CPB2), and endotoxins of Gram-negative bacteria [16, 28]. Staphylococcus aureus can produce enterotoxins in chicken meat if temperature-abused; efforts to neutralize these toxins using phloretin show promise [28]. Clostridium perfringens type G produces NetB toxin essential for necrotic enteritis pathogenesis [16].

Antimicrobial Resistance in the Food Chain

Extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) and carbapenemase-producing enteric pathogens have been identified in animal-origin foods, including poultry, underlining a One Health threat [30]. In Bangladesh, Salmonella Gallinarum-Pullorum showed resistance to multiple antibiotic classes [2]. In Algeria, Campylobacter isolates from poultry meat displayed resistance to ciprofloxacin and tetracycline [32]. These findings emphasize the need for prudent antimicrobial use in poultry production.

Transmission to Humans: "Can You Get E. coli from Chicken?"

"Can you get e coli from chicken" is answered affirmatively; handling or consuming undercooked chicken contaminated with pathogenic E. coli (e.g., aEPEC) can lead to diarrheal disease [33]. Similarly, "salmonella chicken baby" refers to the heightened susceptibility of infants to salmonellosis from contaminated poultry products. The term "chicken salmonella uk" reflects the specific surveillance context of the United Kingdom, where poultry is a dominant source of human salmonellosis and campylobacteriosis.

Diagnostic Approaches for Poultry Bacterial Pathogens

Diagnostic strategies for bacterial pathogens in poultry encompass culture-based isolation, molecular detection, serology, and advanced sequencing. Key techniques are summarized in Table 1.

Table 1. Diagnostic Methods for Major Poultry Bacterial Pathogens

| Pathogen | Key Diagnostic Methods | References | | :-, | :-, | :-, | | Salmonella enterica | Culture, PMAxx-qPCR, indirect ELISA (Sptp), Nanopore sequencing | [1, 25, 3, 4] | | Campylobacter spp. | Microaerobic culture, PCR, whole-genome sequencing | [5, 6, 7, 32] | | Avian pathogenic E. coli | Culture, multiplex PCR for virulence genes, WGS | [10, 33, 34] | | Clostridium perfringens | Anaerobic culture, toxinotyping (PCR), phage typing | [15, 16] | | Staphylococcus aureus | Culture, coagulase test, mecA PCR for MRSA | [17, 28] | | Mycoplasma spp. | Culture, real-time PCR, serology (ELISA) | [22, 21] | | Avibacterium paragallinarum | Culture (NAD-dependent), PCR, serotyping | [23, 24] | | Listeria monocytogenes | Enrichment culture, PCR | [19] | | Pseudomonas lundensis | Culture on selective media, biofilm assays | [20] |

The use of Nanopore amplicon sequencing (NanoPop) for Salmonella virulence genes allows discrimination of mixed serovar populations in complex samples [25]. For Salmonella detection in retail meat, optimized PMAxx real-time PCR distinguishes viable from dead cells, including VBNC states [3]. Sampling strategies for Mycoplasma gallisepticum in layer pullets must account for variability in detection across anatomical sites and time [21]. For A. paragallinarum, reverse vaccinology pipelines identify antigens that can be used in serological assays [23].

Control Strategies: From Farm to Fork

Control of bacterial pathogens in poultry requires an integrated approach encompassing biosecurity, vaccination, antimicrobial stewardship, and post-harvest interventions.

Biosecurity and Management

Transportation welfare affects stress physiology and microbial load in broiler chickens; multifactorial assessments show that transport duration and density influence Campylobacter and Enterobacteriaceae counts [26]. Biofilm formation on processing surfaces facilitates persistence of pathogens; strategies using enzymatic or chemical disruption are under investigation [27, 15]. For Pseudomonas lundensis, dehydroacetic acid disrupts cold adaptation and biofilm formation, enhancing safety of refrigerated poultry [20].

Vaccination and Immunoprophylaxis

Reverse vaccinology identified 14 candidate antigens for A. paragallinarum, some of which are conserved across serovars [23]. A meta-analysis of epitope-based and peptide-based vaccines against APEC, combined with machine learning, identified promising immunogens [14]. Non-pathogenic A. paragallinarum isolates have been tested for their protective potential against infectious coryza [24].

Antimicrobial Alternatives

The rise of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) has driven research into alternatives. Bacillus-derived antimicrobial peptides offer a replacement for antibiotics in poultry, with mechanisms including membrane disruption and inhibition of protein synthesis [31]. Organic acids, such as butyrate and propionate, inhibit Salmonella infection in chicken macrophage-like cells by modulating itaconate gene expression [35]. Bacteriophages specific to C. perfringens type G reduce pathogen load in necrotic enteritis models [16]. The herb pair Ilex rotunda-Cyperus rotundus extract shows preventive effects against avian colibacillosis [11]. Tilmicosin combined with sinomenine synergistically inhibits M. synoviae [22].

Quorum-Sensing Interference

Targeting quorum-sensing systems presents a novel antivirulence strategy. In APEC, the LuxS/AI-2 system regulates biofilm formation and motility; disruption reduces pathogenicity [10]. The LsrR regulator modulates resistance to oxidative stress by sulfate assimilation, presenting another target [13]. The ecnAB toxin-antitoxin system controls capsular sialic acid biosynthesis, linking toxin-antitoxin modules to virulence regulation [34].

A Decision Framework for Diagnosis and Control

The following Mermaid diagram outlines a practical clinical and laboratory decision tree for investigating bacterial respiratory disease in chickens, integrating clinical signs, sampling, and diagnostic assays.

flowchart TD
    A[Respiratory signs in flock], > B[Clinical examination & history]
    B, > C[Differential: Mycoplasma, Avibacterium, E. coli, viruses]
    C, > D[Sample collection: tracheal swabs, air sacs, blood]
    D, > E[Primary diagnostic tests]
    E, > F{Culture isolation}
    F, >|NAD-dependent| G[Avibacterium paragallinarum]
    F, >|Catalase/oxidase| H[Mycoplasma spp.]
    F, >|Gram-negative rods| I[E. coli / Pasteurella]
    E, > J{Molecular tests}
    J, > K[PCR for M. gallisepticum/synoviae]
    J, > L[PCR for A. paragallinarum]
    J, > M[PCR for APEC virulence genes]
    E, > N[Serology: ELISA for Mycoplasma / Salmonella]
    F & J & N, > O[Confirm pathogen & AMR profile]
    O, > P[Select treatment or control measure]
    P, > Q[Antimicrobial sensitivity test]
    P, > R[Vaccination / biosecurity enhancement]
    Q & R, > S[Monitor flock recovery]

Conclusion

Bacterial pathogens in poultry, including Salmonella, Campylobacter, E. coli, Clostridium perfringens, Staphylococcus aureus, and others, impose a dual burden: causing clinical disease in flocks and threatening food safety. The persistent questions "does all chicken have salmonella", "can you get e coli from chicken", and "cooking chicken kill bacteria" reflect public awareness of these risks. Recent research advances have elucidated virulence mechanisms, antimicrobial resistance patterns, and novel control strategies such as phage therapy, quorum-sensing inhibition, and alternative antimicrobials. Rigorous diagnostic approaches, from PMAxx-qPCR to Nanopore sequencing, enable precise identification and characterization. Integrating these findings into veterinary practice and regulatory frameworks, including FSIS poultry salmonella guidelines, will continue to reduce the impact of these pathogens on animal health and public health.

References

[1] Eidaroos NH, Khafagy AR, Eldein AE et al. Virulence and Antimicrobial Resistance Gene Profiling of Salmonella Isolated from Dead-in-Shell Eggs and Hatchery Environments with Emphasis on Class 1 Integron Gene Cassette Sequencing in XDR Strains. Microb Pathog. 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42331072/

[2] Kingshuk MMR, Alam SB, Rahman MS et al. The Landscape of Salmonella enterica Serovar Gallinarum-Pullorum Antimicrobial Resistance in Bangladesh's Poultry Industry: A Combined Phenotypic and Molecular Study. Microbiologyopen. 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42271175/

[3] Pham HT, Nguyen TH, Lam THA et al. Detection of viable and VBNC Salmonella in retail meat using optimized PMAxx real-time PCR. J Microbiol Methods. 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42229763/

[4] Xie L, Xia Y, Shen R et al. Establishment of an indirect ELISA method for detecting Salmonella infection based on Sptp protein in poultry. J Microbiol Methods. 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42219045/

[5] Abedini Chamgordani S, Rezaei M, Neyriz Naghadehi M. Investigating Campylobacter Contamination of Broiler Chicken in Isfahan Province (Iran) and Evaluating the Antibiotic Resistance Patterns of the Isolates. Vet Med Int. 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42327974/

[6] Qumar S, Hamad M, AbuOdeh R et al. Comprehensive genomic insights into lineages, virulence, and antibiotic resistance profiles of Campylobacter jejuni entailing a global One Health scenario. Gut Pathog. 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42288821/

[7] Joaquim P, Balbiani F, Socas ML et al. Experimental infection of laying hens with Campylobacter coli and Campylobacter jejuni: Shedding dynamics and internal organ colonization. Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis. 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42229090/

[8] Ivanov I, Takkinen HK, Takkinen J et al. Sources of Human Campylobacteriosis Cases in Estonia and the Genomic Associations with Broiler Chicken Meat Isolates. Pathogens. 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42198665/

[9] Xiang DF, Narindoshvili T, Raushel FM. Elucidation of the Pathway for the Biosynthesis of the Undecorated Capsular Polysaccharide from the HS:19 Serotype of the Human Pathogen Campylobacter jejuni. Biochemistry. 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42241030/

[10] Liu C, Hu J, Guo M et al. LuxS facilitates environmental adaptability and competition capability of avian pathogenic Escherichia coli. Poult Sci. 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42314259/

[11] Liu H, Yang A, Wei X et al. Preventive effects and underlying mechanisms of Ilex rotunda Thunb.-Cyperus rotundus L. herb pair extract on avian colibacillosis in chickens. Poult Sci. 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42308740/

[12] Li Y, Xue Y, Quan Y et al. Direct interaction between avian pathogenic Escherichia coli and H9N2 avian influenza virus promotes bacterial adhesion during their infections. Microbiol Spectr. 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42294695/

[13] Kong L, Tu C, Song X et al. Quorum-sensing regulator LsrR modulates resistance to oxidative stress by interfering with sulfate assimilation in avian pathogenic Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42284197/

[14] Waseem M, Kamran Z, Ali A. Advancing poultry health: A meta-analysis of epitope-based and peptide-based vaccines against Avian Pathogenic E. coli with machine learning insights. PLoS One. 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42201941/

[15] Chowdhury MAH, Reem CSA, Ashrafudoulla M et al. Biofilm Formation and Spore-Mediated Persistence of Clostridium perfringens in Meat and Poultry Processing Environments and Their Implications for Control Strategies. J Food Sci. 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42316807/

[16] Duc HM, Lan NT, Hoa TTK et al. Toxinotyping, Antibiotic Resistance Profile, and In Vitro Bio-Control of Clostridium perfringens Type G Isolated from Chickens with Necrotic Enteritis by Lytic Bacteriophages. Antibiotics (Basel). 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42192675/

[17] Lee YH, Ali MS, Moon BY et al. Longitudinal surveillance and molecular characterization of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) from livestock carcasses in South Korea: A 12-year nationwide study (2013-2024). Food Microbiol. 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42215217/

[18] Szafraniec GM, Chrobak-Chmiel D, Adamczyk K et al. Phenotypic and genotypic characterization of antimicrobial resistance in coagulase-negative staphylococci from bone lesions in broiler chickens. BMC Vet Res. 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi

[19] Kačániová M, Zhang G, Popovic S et al. Extension of Sous Vide Preservation of Wild Turkey (Meleagris gallopavo L.) Meat With Rosmarinus officinalis Essential Oil: A Study on Chemical Composition and Antibacterial Effectiveness Against Listeria monocytogenes and Other Population of Isolated Microbiota. Environ Microbiol Rep. 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42212705/

[20] Li Y, Lu Y, Zhang Z et al. Dehydroacetic acid disrupts cold adaptation and biofilm formation in Pseudomonas lundensis: A targeted strategy for enhancing microbiological safety of refrigerated poultry. Food Microbiol. 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42215219/

[21] Sasidharan SK, Elliott KEC, Evans JD et al. Effects of sampling location and frequency on the detection of Mycoplasma gallisepticum populations in the respiratory tract of commercial layer pullets. Poult Sci. 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42308738/

[22] Deng B, Wang X, Li M et al. A novel therapeutic strategy for Mycoplasma synoviae infection: Elucidating the synergistic effects and underlying mechanisms of Tilmicosin and Sinomenine. Poult Sci. 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42308745/

[23] Felici ME, Castell SD, Marconi G et al. Identification of candidate antigens for a vaccine against Avibacterium paragallinarum using reverse vaccinology. Poult Sci. 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42302611/

[24] Shelkamy MMS, Fay C, Hashish A et al. Investigating the pathogenicity of novel non-pathogenic Avibacterium paragallinarum isolates and their protective potential against infectious coryza. Avian Pathol. 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42210853/

[25] Ayala-Velastegui D, Mortimer TD, Siceloff AT et al. NanoPop: Nanopore amplicon sequencing of Salmonella virulence genes to characterize complex mixed serovar populations using k-mers to overcome high sequencing error rates. Microb Genom. 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42329233/

[26] Fahim MFA, Banik B, Pranto PS et al. Transportation welfare under commercial conditions: A multifactorial assessment of stress physiology, meat quality, and microbial load in broiler chickens. Poult Sci. 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42330766/

[27] Alsuwat MA, Shah AA, Ullah S et al. Microbial Biofilm Formation to Mitigate Foodborne Pathogens Strategies and Control Measures. Indian J Microbiol. 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42325454/