Bacterial Pathogens in Poultry: Salmonella, Escherichia coli, and Campylobacter

Introduction

Poultry flocks are commonly colonized by three major bacterial pathogens of veterinary and food safety importance: Salmonella spp., avian pathogenic Escherichia coli (APEC), and Campylobacter spp. [1, 2]. These agents cause significant economic losses due to morbidity, mortality, and reduced productivity, and they represent a primary reservoir for zoonotic transmission through meat and eggs [3, 4]. Understanding the biological mechanisms, epidemiological drivers, and diagnostic methods for these pathogens is essential for effective flock management and public health protection [5, 6]. This article provides a detailed, evidence-based review of each pathogen, covering etiology, clinical signs, pathology, diagnostic approaches, treatment considerations, and control strategies.

Etiology and Taxonomy

Salmonella enterica comprises over 2,500 serovars, with poultry-adapted biovars including Salmonella Gallinarum (biovar Gallinarum and biovar Pullorum) causing fowl typhoid and pullorum disease, respectively [33]. Non-typhoidal serovars such as Salmonella Enteritidis and Salmonella Typhimurium colonize the gastrointestinal tract without causing clinical disease in chickens but are major foodborne hazards [7, 8]. Escherichia coli is a Gram-negative facultative anaerobe; avian pathogenic E. coli (APEC) strains possess specific virulence genes enabling extraintestinal infection, leading to colibacillosis [9, 6]. Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli are thermophilic, microaerophilic, spiral-shaped bacteria that asymptomatically colonize the ceca of broilers and layers [8, 10].

Epidemiology and Prevalence

Prevalence of these pathogens varies by region, production system, and sampling method. A study in Jiangxi Province, China, reported an overall bacterial isolation rate of 62.90% from clinically diseased poultry (chickens, ducks, geese), with APEC accounting for 57.53% of isolates, followed by Salmonella spp. at 11.87% [9]. In a survey of pastured poultry flocks in the southeastern United States, multidrug resistance was detected in Salmonella, Listeria, and Campylobacter despite no antibiotic use on farms, indicating environmental reservoirs [11]. Metagenomic analysis of cloacal and oropharyngeal swabs from Kenyan poultry revealed Proteobacteria, Chlamydiae, and Firmicutes as dominant phyla, with abundant antimicrobial resistance (AMR) genes for beta-lactams, aminoglycosides, and tetracyclines [3]. Campylobacter is frequently detected in broiler ceca at processing: real-time PCR quantification in Brazilian slaughterhouses found 44.4% of flocks positive for Campylobacter, with mean loads of 6.4 log10 cells/g [8].

Clinical Signs and Pathology

Salmonellosis

Fowl typhoid (biovar Gallinarum) and pullorum disease (biovar Pullorum) are host-specific systemic infections causing acute septicemia in young birds and chronic infection in adults [33]. Clinical signs include depression, anorexia, diarrhea (white pasty vent pasting in pullorum disease), and increased mortality [33]. Necropsy findings reveal enlarged liver and spleen, hemorrhagic enteritis, and caseous cecal cores. Subclinical carriage is common in older birds.

Colibacillosis

APEC is the primary cause of colibacillosis, which manifests as respiratory infection, airsacculitis, pericarditis, perihepatitis, and septicemia [9, 6]. The bacteria enter via respiratory tract following immunosuppression or viral co-infection. Lesions include fibrinous polyserositis and yolk sac infection in chicks [6].

Campylobacteriosis

Campylobacter is generally considered a commensal in poultry, colonizing the cecal and colonic crypts without inducing overt disease in healthy birds [5]. However, under stress or co-infection, it may cause mild enteritis. The main concern is carcass contamination during processing.

Diagnostics

Conventional diagnostic methods include bacterial culture on selective media (e.g., XLD for Salmonella, MacConkey for E. coli, mCCDA for Campylobacter) followed by biochemical and serological confirmation [12, 7]. Molecular techniques provide rapid, sensitive detection. Real-time PCR and droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) allow quantification directly from cecal contents or processing water [8, 10]. Multiplex PCR can detect virulence and AMR genes, such as blaCTX-M, tet, and sul families [1, 13]. Next-generation sequencing enables comprehensive genomic epidemiology and AMR surveillance [2, 3]. Biosensors, including CRISPR-based systems, are emerging for on-site detection along the poultry value chain [14].

The following Mermaid diagram illustrates an evidence-based diagnostic workflow for poultry bacterial pathogens.

flowchart TD
    A[Sample collection: cloacal swab, cecal content, litter, carcass rinse], > B[Selective enrichment]
    B, > C{Primary isolation on selective agar}
    C, > D[Salmonella: XLD, Hektoen]
    C, > E[E. coli: MacConkey, EMB]
    C, > F[Campylobacter: mCCDA, Campy-Cefex]
    D, > G[Biochemical/serological confirmation]
    E, > H[Biochemical/serological confirmation + virulence gene PCR]
    F, > I[Microaerophilic incubation 42°C, hippurate test, PCR]
    G & H & I, > J[Antimicrobial susceptibility testing (disk diffusion, MIC)]
    J, > K[Molecular characterization: multiplex PCR for AMR genes, MLST, WGS]
    K, > L[Data integration and reporting]

Antimicrobial Resistance

AMR in poultry pathogens is a critical global issue [6]. APEC isolates frequently exhibit multidrug resistance (MDR), with a study in China showing 99.21% of APEC strains resistant to seven or more antimicrobial categories [9]. Resistance to ampicillin, amoxicillin, tetracycline, and florfenicol is common [9, 6]. In Salmonella isolated from poultry meat in Romania, MDR was detected in 23% of isolates, with resistance to tetracycline, sulfonamides, and quinolones [7]. ESBL/carbapenemase genes (e.g., blaTEM, blaSHV, blaCTX-M, blaNDM) have been identified in E. coli and Salmonella from farm-level samples, with turkey farms showing higher prevalence [1]. Campylobacter also carries resistance genes for fluoroquinolones and macrolides [6, 7].

The table below summarizes key AMR findings from selected studies.

Treatment and Control

Therapeutic intervention is guided by antimicrobial susceptibility testing, but the emergence of MDR limits options [6]. In many regions, antibiotics are restricted or banned for growth promotion, prompting research into alternatives. Plant-derived compounds, essential oils, and nanoparticles have demonstrated antibacterial activity against these pathogens. Thyme essential oil reduced E. coli and Salmonella Derby in poultry litter by 73-78% [15]. Papain treatment of chilled chicken meat significantly lowered total viable counts and coliform counts, delaying spoilage [1]. Zinc oxide nanoparticles synthesized from Achyranthes aspera showed MIC values of 0.195-0.390 mg/mL against Salmonella Gallinarum and Salmonella Enteritidis [16]. Herbal extracts such as marjoram, garlic, and cinnamon exhibited in vitro and in vivo efficacy against MDR S. aureus and Salmonella Typhimurium causing leg disorders in poultry [17]. Immunomodulation through dietary supplementation is another avenue to enhance resistance to Salmonella and Campylobacter colonization [5].

Control Strategies at Flock and Processing Level

Preharvest control involves biosecurity, litter management, vaccination (e.g., live attenuated Salmonella vaccines), and feed additives that reduce pathogen shedding [33, 18]. Litter re-utilization can lead to pathogen accumulation; coarse litter fractions may still harbor E. coli and Campylobacter [19, 34]. During processing, critical control points include scalding, chilling, and rinsing; ddPCR has shown superior sensitivity over culture for detecting Salmonella, Campylobacter, and Listeria in processing water [10]. Education of consumers on proper cooking temperatures (e.g., cooking chicken kill bacteria concept) and avoidance of cross-contamination is essential. There is no evidence that all chicken has Salmonella; prevalence varies widely. However, raw poultry meat is commonly contaminated, and proper cooking eliminates vegetative pathogens.

Special Considerations and Common Questions

Does cooked chicken grow bacteria?

Cooked chicken can support bacterial growth if stored improperly after cooking due to post-cooking contamination. Reheating chicken to an internal temperature above 74°C can kill vegetative cells but does not eliminate preformed toxins produced by some bacteria (e.g., Staphylococcus aureus enterotoxins). The question "reheat chicken kill bacteria" is affirmative for live organisms but not for heat-stable toxins.

Do chickens carry E. coli and Salmonella?

Yes. E. coli is part of the normal gut microbiota, but APEC strains cause disease. Salmonella may be carried asymptomatically. The phrase "chicken e coli or salmonella" reflects common confusion; both can be present, but they differ in pathogenesis. "E coli on raw chicken" is common, and proper handling is required.

Does all chicken have Salmonella?

No. Prevalence varies by region and production system. FSIS poultry salmonella reduction programs aim to lower carcass contamination.

Salmonella and specific populations

"Salmonella chicken baby" refers to the heightened risk of severe disease in infants. Similarly, "chicken salmonella uk" highlights regional surveillance efforts. "Chicken breast bacteria" may refer to any of the three pathogens; Campylobacter is often found on breast meat.

Bacterial toxins in chicken

Some bacteria (e.g., Staphylococcus aureus, Clostridium perfringens) produce toxins that survive cooking. The article [20] discusses E. coli O157:H7 as a pathogen of concern.

Conclusion

Salmonella, avian pathogenic Escherichia coli, and Campylobacter remain the most important bacterial pathogens in poultry, causing clinical disease in flocks and serving as major sources of foodborne illness. The rise of multidrug resistance, including ESBL and carbapenemase producers, demands integrated control strategies that combine biosecurity, vaccination, alternative antimicrobials, and advanced diagnostics. Omics technologies and biosensors are enhancing our ability to monitor these pathogens across the poultry value chain [2, 14]. Continued research into host-pathogen interactions and novel interventions will be critical for sustainable poultry production and food safety.

References

[1] Khalefa, H.S., Ahmed, Z.S., El-saadany, A., et al. The effect of papain on some bacterial pathogens in poultry meat. Poultry Science, 2026. URL

[2] Deblais, L., Kathayat, D., Helmy, Y.A., et al. Translating 'big data': better understanding of host-pathogen interactions to control bacterial foodborne pathogens in poultry. Animal Health Research Reviews, 2020. URL

[3] Panyako, P., Ommeh, S., Kuria, S., et al. Metagenomic Characterization of Poultry Cloacal and Oropharyngeal Swabs in Kenya Reveals Bacterial Pathogens and Their Antimicrobial Resistance Genes. International Journal of Microbiology, 2024. URL

[4] Mor-Mur, M., Yuste, J. Emerging Bacterial Pathogens in Meat and Poultry: An Overview. 2009. URL

[5] Swaggerty, C., Callaway, T., Kogut, M., et al. Modulation of the Immune Response to Improve Health and Reduce Foodborne Pathogens in Poultry. Microorganisms, 2019. URL

[6] Nhung, N.T., Chansiripornchai, N., Carrique-Mas, J. Antimicrobial Resistance in Bacterial Poultry Pathogens: A Review. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 2017. URL

[7] Dan, S., Tăbăran, A., Mihaiu, L., et al. Antibiotic susceptibility and prevalence of foodborne pathogens in poultry meat in Romania. Journal of Infection in Developing Countries, 2015. URL

[8] Souza, M., Wolf, J., Zanetti, N.S., et al. Direct Detection and Quantification of Bacterial Pathogens from Broiler Cecal Samples in the Slaughter Line by Real-Time PCR. Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science, 2022. URL

[9] Tan, M.-F., Li, H., Yang, Q., et al. Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance profile of bacterial pathogens isolated from poultry in Jiangxi Province, China from 2020 to 2022. Poultry Science, 2023. URL

[10] Rothrock, M.J., Hiett, K., Kiepper, B., et al. Quantification of Zoonotic Bacterial Pathogens within Commercial Poultry Processing Water Samples Using Droplet Digital PCR. 2013. URL

[11] Ayoola, M., Pillai, N., Nanduri, B., et al. Preharvest Environmental and Management Drivers of Multidrug Resistance in Major Bacterial Zoonotic Pathogens in Pastured Poultry Flocks. Microorganisms, 2022. URL

[12] Parveen, A., Rahman, M., Fakhruzzaman, et al. Characterization of bacterial pathogens from egg shell, egg yolk, feed and air samples of poultry houses. 2017. URL

[13] Sajish, V.P., Uzzaman, N., Aramvalarthan, N., et al. Prevalence, distribution and antimicrobial resistance profiles in poultry meat samples from India: a systematic review. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 2025. URL

[14] Boodhoo, N., Shoja Doost, J., Sharif, S. Biosensors for Monitoring, Detecting, and Tracking Dissemination of Poultry-Borne Bacterial Pathogens Along the Poultry Value Chain: A Review. Animals, 2024. URL

[15] Galgano, M., Pellegrini, F., Fracchiolla, G., et al. Pilot Study on the Action of Thymus vulgaris Essential Oil in Treating the Most Common Bacterial Contaminants and Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica Serovar Derby in Poultry Litter. Antibiotics, 2023. URL

[16] Saeed, S., Nawaz, S., Nisar, A., et al. Effective fabrication of zinc-oxide (ZnO) nanoparticles using Achyranthes aspera leaf extract and their potent biological activities against the bacterial poultry pathogens. 2021. URL

[17] Awad, N.F., Abd El-Hamid, M.A., Nabil, N.M., et al. Multidrug resistant and multivirulent avian bacterial pathogens: tackling experimental leg disorders using phytobiotics and antibiotics alone or in combination. Poultry Science, 2023. URL

[18] Arsi, K., Donoghue, D., Venkitanarayanan, K., et al. Reducing Foodborne Pathogens in Organic Poultry: Challenges and Opportunities. Food Safety in Poultry Meat Production, 2019. URL

[19] Kelley, T., Pancorbo, O., Merka, W., et al. Bacterial Pathogens and Indicators in Poultry Litter during Re-Utilization. 1995. [URL](https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/930e1be20de7fe5b

[20] Meshaal, A.K., Hetta, H., Yahia, R., et al. In Vitro Antimicrobial Activity of Medicinal Plant Extracts against Some Bacterial Pathogens Isolated from Raw and Processed Meat. Life, 2021. URL

[21] Iheukwumere, I., Iheukwumere, C., Iloegbunam, S.O., et al. Extraction and Elucidation of Antibiotics from the Mycelia of Aspergillus niger Isolated from Poultry Farm against Enteric Bacterial Pathogens. IPS Journal of Advanced and Applied Biochemistry, 2025. URL

[22] Nordentoft, S., Fischer, C.H., Bjerrum, L. Reduction of bacterial pathogens in poultry manure by Musca domestica fly larvae. 2014. URL

[23] Bobbarala, V., Duggirala, V., Rani, G.E. Anti-bacterial properties of herbal extracts towards bacterial pathogens in poultry. 2009. URL

[24] Lydia D, E., Gupta, C., Khusro, A., et al. Susceptibility of poultry associated bacterial pathogens to Momordica charantia fruits and evaluation of in vitro biological properties. Microbial Pathogenesis, 2019. URL

[25] Anwar, M., Muhammad, F., Awais, M.M., et al. A review of β-glucans as a growth promoter and antibiotic alternative against enteric pathogens in poultry. 2017. URL

[26] Olawuwo, O., Famuyide, I., Mcgaw, L. Antibacterial and Antibiofilm Activity of Selected Medicinal Plant Leaf Extracts Against Pathogens Implicated in Poultry Diseases. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 2022. URL

[27] Mei, C., Liu, M., Pan, X., et al. Research progress on Avibacterium paragallinarum and related bacterial and viral diseases in poultry and their mixed infections. Frontiers in Microbiology, 2026. URL

[28] Muinde, P., Maina, J., Momanyi, K., et al. Antimicrobial Resistant Pathogens Detected in Raw Pork and Poultry Meat in Retailing Outlets in Kenya. Antibiotics, 2023. URL

[29] Bacci, C., Vismarra, A., Dander, S., et al. Occurrence and Antimicrobial Profile of Bacterial Pathogens in Former Foodstuff Meat Products Used for Pet Diets. Journal of Food Protection, 2019. URL

[30] Foster, N. Immunity to bacterial pathogens of pigs and chickens. Advancements and Technologies in Pig and Poultry Bacterial Disease Control, 2021. URL

[31] Omojowo, F.S., Omojasola, F.P. Antibiotic Resistance Pattern Of Bacterial Pathogens Isolated From Poultry Manure Used To Fertilize Fish Ponds In New Bussa, Nigeria. 2013. URL

[32] Bodhidatta, L., Srijan, A., Serichantalergs, O., et al. Bacterial pathogens isolated from raw meat and poultry compared with pathogens isolated from children in the same area of rural Thailand. Southeast Asian Journal of Tropical Medicine and Public Health, 2013. URL