Bacterial Pathogens in Chickens: Salmonella, Escherichia coli, and Other Common Agents

Bacterial infections remain a leading cause of morbidity, mortality, and economic loss in commercial poultry operations worldwide. In chickens, pathogens such as Salmonella enterica, avian pathogenic Escherichia coli (APEC), Campylobacter jejuni, and Clostridium perfringens account for the majority of clinical disease and food safety concerns [1, 2, 3]. The term "chicken ka bacteria" colloquially refers to these microorganisms, which can cause both acute systemic disease in flocks and contamination of poultry products [4, 5]. Understanding the biology, transmission, and control of these agents is essential for veterinary practitioners, diagnosticians, and regulatory bodies.

Salmonella and E. coli are frequently compared in clinical settings: the question "chicken e coli or salmonella" reflects the overlapping clinical presentations but distinct pathogenic mechanisms of these two genera [6, 7]. Moreover, the presence of "e coli on raw chicken" and Salmonella contamination has driven regulatory programs such as FSIS poultry Salmonella performance standards [8, 9]. This article provides an exhaustive review of the major bacterial pathogens affecting chickens, with emphasis on etiology, epidemiology, clinical signs, pathology, diagnostic methods, and control measures.

Salmonella in Chickens: Etiology and Epidemiology

Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica includes over 2,500 serovars, many of which colonize the gastrointestinal tract of chickens without causing clinical disease [1, 9]. However, host-adapted serovars such as S. Gallinarum and S. Pullorum cause fowl typhoid and pullorum disease, respectively, leading to septicemia and high mortality, especially in young birds [1, 9]. Non-typhoidal serovars such as S. Enteritidis and S. Typhimurium are major foodborne pathogens and can be transmitted vertically through the egg [10, 11]. The question "does all chicken have salmonella" is nuanced: while not every bird carries the organism, prevalence in commercial flocks can be substantial depending on biosecurity and region [12, 13].

Horizontal transmission occurs via the fecal-oral route, contaminated feed, water, litter, and equipment [2, 14]. Vertical transmission is especially important for S. Enteritidis, which colonizes the ovarian tissue and can contaminate eggs before shell formation [10]. "Salmonella chicken only" is a misperception; this pathogen also infects other livestock and wildlife, but chickens are a primary reservoir for several serovars [8, 15]. In the United Kingdom, "chicken salmonella uk" epidemiology has focused on S. Enteritidis and S. Typhimurium, with vaccination programs reducing prevalence [15, 12]. "FSIS poultry salmonella" refers to the Food Safety and Inspection Service's regulatory framework that sets maximum allowable prevalence levels in raw poultry products [8, 12].

Risk factors for flock infection include poor biosecurity, stress from transportation, heat stress, and concurrent immunosuppressive diseases [2, 3]. "Poultry quizlet" resources often summarize these risk factors and serovar classifications for veterinary students. The presence of "salmonella chicken baby" highlights the zoonotic risk: infants and immunocompromised individuals are particularly susceptible to salmonellosis from contaminated poultry products [8, 15].

Pathogenesis and Clinical Signs of Salmonellosis

Salmonella pathogenesis involves adhesion to intestinal epithelial cells, invasion via type III secretion systems, and survival within macrophages [1, 16]. In young chicks, S. Pullorum and S. Gallinarum cause septicemia with clinical signs including lethargy, anorexia, white diarrhea, and high mortality [9]. "Chicken bacteria disease" caused by Salmonella may present as acute or chronic infection, with carrier birds shedding the organism intermittently [10, 11].

In older birds, non-typhoidal Salmonella often results in subclinical intestinal carriage, although stress can precipitate shedding [2]. The "salmonella chicken washing" paradox is important: washing raw chicken can aerosolize bacteria and spread contamination to kitchen surfaces, increasing the risk of cross-contamination [17, 18]. Proper thermal inactivation of Salmonella requires an internal temperature of at least 74 degrees Celsius, addressing the common question "cooking chicken kill bacteria" [17, 18]. "Reheat chicken kill bacteria" is also relevant: thorough reheating to 74 degrees Celsius will inactivate vegetative Salmonella cells, but toxins produced by some bacteria may remain stable [17, 19, 18]. The question "does cooked chicken grow bacteria" is critical: if cooked chicken is left at room temperature, surviving spores or post-cooking contamination can allow bacterial growth, including Salmonella and other pathogens [17, 19].

Diagnostic methods for Salmonella include culture on selective media (e.g., XLD, brilliant green agar), serotyping, and molecular methods such as PCR targeting the invA gene [10, 11]. A novel indirect ELISA based on the Sptp protein has been developed for serological screening in poultry [11]. Advanced techniques like PMAxx real-time PCR can differentiate viable cells from viable but nonculturable (VBNC) states [10].

Avian Pathogenic Escherichia coli (APEC) and Colibacillosis

Avian pathogenic E. coli (APEC) is the causative agent of colibacillosis, a complex disease syndrome that includes airsacculitis, pericarditis, perihepatitis, salpingitis, and septicemia [6, 7, 20]. APEC strains belong predominantly to phylogenetic groups B2 and D and harbor virulence factors such as type 1 fimbriae, P fimbriae, aerobactin, hemolysins, and the temperature-sensitive hemagglutinin [7, 21, 20]. The ecnAB toxin-antitoxin system modulates virulence by regulating capsular sialic acid biosynthesis [20]. The Hcp2a protein, a component of the type VI secretion system, induces incomplete autophagy in chicken macrophages, facilitating intracellular survival [22].

"Chicken e coli or salmonella" is a common diagnostic question: both can cause septicemia, but APEC often presents with fibrinous polyserositis, whereas Salmonella may cause enteritis and white diarrhea in pullorum disease [6, 7]. "E coli on raw chicken" is a frequent finding; contamination occurs during slaughter and processing via fecal spillage [21, 13]. "Can you get e coli from chicken" is answered affirmatively: APEC strains are primarily avian pathogens, but some E. coli pathotypes (e.g., atypical enteropathogenic E. coli) have been isolated from retail chicken meat and may pose a zoonotic risk [21].

Clinical colibacillosis is often secondary to respiratory viral infections such as H9N2 avian influenza, which promotes bacterial adhesion to respiratory epithelium [7]. Stress factors including poor ventilation, high stocking density, and immunosuppression predispose flocks to APEC infection [2, 3]. The "chicken neck bacteria" niche is relevant: E. coli and other bacteria can colonize the pharyngeal and crop mucosa, leading to systemic invasion after respiratory damage [23].

Treatment of colibacillosis is complicated by antimicrobial resistance. Extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing E. coli are increasingly reported in poultry [24, 25]. A 14-year longitudinal study in Korea documented a rising trend in third-generation cephalosporin resistance among E. coli from livestock [25]. Alternative strategies include the use of herbal extracts such as Ilex rotunda-Cyperus rotundus herb pair extract, which has shown preventive effects against colibacillosis [6]. The "chicken bacteria toxins" concept applies: APEC produces endotoxins (LPS) and exotoxins, while other bacteria like Clostridium perfringens produce potent necrotic enteritis toxins [26].

Other Common Bacterial Pathogens

Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli are the leading bacterial causes of foodborne gastroenteritis in humans and are highly prevalent in chicken intestinal tracts [4, 8, 27]. Chickens are asymptomatic carriers; the bacteria colonize the cecal crypts and are shed in feces [4, 27]. Contamination of meat occurs during processing, and "pathogens is most common in raw poultry meat" includes Campylobacter alongside Salmonella and E. coli [4, 15]. Campylobacter exhibits phase variation in genes involved in motility and glycosylation, which helps evade host immune responses [27]. The capsule polysaccharide biosynthesis pathway has been elucidated for serotype HS:19 [28]. Antimicrobial resistance in Campylobacter is a growing concern, with multidrug-resistant strains identified in poultry production systems [4, 8].

Clostridium perfringens type G is the major cause of necrotic enteritis in broiler chickens, a disease characterized by sudden onset, severe intestinal necrosis, and high mortality [26]. Predisposing factors include dietary changes, coccidiosis, and immunosuppression. The bacterium produces alpha toxin and NetB toxin, which cause mucosal damage and necrosis [26]. Lytic bacteriophages have been investigated as biocontrol agents against C. perfringens [26]. "Chicken bacteria disease" associated with Clostridium also includes botulism (C. botulinum) and ulcerative enteritis (C. colinum).

Mycoplasma synoviae and M. gallisepticum are cell-wall-deficient bacteria responsible for respiratory disease and synovitis in chickens [5, 23]. Coinfections with other respiratory pathogens such as Avibacterium paragallinarum (infectious coryza) and Ornithobacterium rhinotracheale are common [23]. A novel therapeutic strategy combining tilmicosin and sinomenine has shown synergistic effects against M. synoviae [5].

Staphylococcus aureus, including methicillin-resistant strains (MRSA), can cause bumblefoot, osteomyelitis, and septicemia in broilers [29, 30]. Coagulase-negative staphylococci are also isolated from bone lesions and exhibit multidrug resistance [30]. "Chicken breast bacteria" may include Staphylococcus if post-processing contamination occurs [18]. The "chicken bacteria toxins" produced by S. aureus (enterotoxins) are heat-stable and can cause food poisoning even after cooking [18].

Avibacterium paragallinarum causes infectious coryza, an upper respiratory infection characterized by facial edema, nasal discharge, and conjunctivitis [31]. Non-pathogenic variants have been investigated for vaccine potential [31].

Bacterial Contamination of Poultry Meat: Risks and Mitigation

Contamination of poultry meat with pathogenic bacteria occurs at multiple points from farm to fork. "Chicken salmonella uk" surveillance programs have reduced but not eliminated Salmonella from retail meat [15, 12]. "E coli on raw chicken" and Campylobacter are common findings in many countries [4, 21, 13]. "Chicken breast bacteria" levels vary depending on processing hygiene, storage temperature, and packaging [19, 15]. "Chicken neck bacteria" levels are often higher due to skin folds and lymphatic tissue [23].

The question "does cooked chicken grow bacteria" is answered by understanding that cooking kills vegetative cells but not necessarily spores. Post-cooking contamination from hands, cutting boards, or utensils can introduce bacteria, which then multiply if the food is held at temperatures between 4 and 60 degrees Celsius [17, 18]. "Reheat chicken kill bacteria" is effective only if the internal temperature reaches 74 degrees Celsius; however, heat-stable toxins (e.g., staphylococcal enterotoxins) remain active [18].

"Salmonella chicken washing" is discouraged by food safety authorities because splashing water can spread bacteria up to one meter from the sink [17, 18]. "Cooking chicken kill bacteria" is the only reliable method to ensure safety. Proper cooking times and temperatures must be validated for different chicken cuts and cooking methods [17, 18]. The "chicken bacteria toxins" produced by some pathogens, such as enterotoxigenic E. coli and C. perfringens, are heat-labile but may still cause illness if preformed toxins are present in contaminated meat before cooking [26, 18].

"Poultry quizlet" study materials often highlight that the most common pathogens in raw poultry meat are Salmonella, Campylobacter, and E. coli [4, 8, 15]. "Chicken diseases caused by bacteria" range from systemic infections like colibacillosis and fowl typhoid to localized conditions like bumblefoot and infectious coryza [1, 6, 31]. "Chicken bacteria disease" management requires integrated control measures including vaccination, biosecurity, and antimicrobial stewardship [9, 16].

Diagnostic Approaches

Diagnosis of bacterial infections in chickens relies on a combination of clinical observation, necropsy, and laboratory testing. Culture on selective media remains the gold standard for Salmonella, E. coli, and Campylobacter [10, 11]. For Campylobacter, microaerophilic incubation at 42 degrees Celsius on Campy-Cefex agar is standard [4, 27]. For Clostridium perfringens, anaerobic culture on blood agar and toxinotyping by PCR are performed [26].

Molecular diagnostics have greatly enhanced detection speed and specificity. Real-time PCR targeting the invA gene for Salmonella and the 16S rRNA gene for Campylobacter can detect low levels of bacteria in meat samples [10]. PMAxx real-time PCR discriminates viable from dead cells [10]. "Shotgun metagenomic diagnosis" can identify unidentified pathogens in clinical samples such as hepatic necrosis cases in chickens [32].

Serological methods include ELISA for Salmonella antibody detection using the Sptp antigen [11] and for Mycoplasma synoviae [5]. The "chicken salmonella uk" surveillance programs use both microbiological and serological testing [15]. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing is performed by disk diffusion or broth microdilution following CLSI guidelines [9, 30].

The diagnostic workflow for suspect bacterial disease in chickens is illustrated in Figure 1.

flowchart TD
    A[Clinical signs: diarrhea, respiratory distress, mortality], > B{Necropsy}
    B, > C[Gross lesions: fibrinous polyserositis, enteritis, joint swelling]
    C, > D[Sampling: liver, spleen, cecal tonsils, bone marrow, meat]
    D, > E[Gram stain: identify gram-negative rods, gram-positive cocci]
    E, > F[Selective culture: MacConkey, XLD, Campy-Cefex, blood agar]
    F, > G[Isolation & identification: biochemical tests, MALDI-TOF]
    G, > H[Antimicrobial susceptibility testing]
    G, > I[Molecular subtyping: PCR, serotyping, whole genome sequencing]
    H, > J[Tailored treatment: antimicrobial, supportive care]
    I, > K[Epidemiological tracking & biosecurity adjustments]

Antimicrobial Resistance and Control Strategies

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a critical challenge in poultry bacterial disease management. Salmonella strains with extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) and carbapenemase genes have been isolated from hatchery environments and dead-in-shell eggs [1]. "Chicken bacteria resistance" profiles show increasing resistance to fluoroquinolones and third-generation cephalosporins in E. coli from livestock [24, 25]. Campylobacter isolates from broilers exhibit high resistance to ciprofloxacin and tetracycline in some regions [4, 8]. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) has been detected in livestock carcasses over a 12-year period in South Korea [29].

Control strategies include biosecurity measures such as all-in-all-out production, disinfection of housing and equipment, and pest control [2, 14]. Vaccination is available for Salmonella (live attenuated and killed vaccines), infectious coryza (bacterins), and mycoplasmosis [5, 31]. Dietary interventions such as organic acids can inhibit Salmonella invasion of macrophages by modulating itaconate gene expression [16]. Dehydroacetic acid disrupts cold adaptation and biofilm formation in Pseudomonas species on refrigerated poultry [19]. The antimicrobial peptide thanatin targets the Lpt system in gram-negative bacteria and has potential for sterilization and preservation of food [17].

Use of herbal extracts like Ilex rotunda-Cyperus rotundus reduces APEC load in experimental colibacillosis [6]. "Reheat chicken kill bacteria" control at the consumer level is essential, but proper handling and cooking remain the most effective barriers against foodborne illness [17, 18].

Conclusion

Bacterial pathogens in chickens, particularly Salmonella, E. coli, Campylobacter, and C. perfringens, represent significant threats to poultry health and food safety. The term "chicken ka bacteria" encompasses these and other agents that can cause disease in birds and humans. Addressing questions such as "does all chicken have salmonella", "can you get e coli from chicken", and "cooking chicken kill bacteria" requires an evidence-based understanding of prevalence, transmission, and thermal inactivation. Rigorous diagnostic protocols, prudent antimicrobial use, and multifaceted control programs are essential to reduce the burden of bacterial diseases in poultry and to safeguard public health.

References

[1] Eidaroos NH, Khafagy AR, Eldein AE, et al. Virulence and Antimicrobial Resistance Gene Profiling of Salmonella Isolated from Dead-in-Shell Eggs and Hatchery Environments with Emphasis on Class 1 Integron Gene Cassette Sequencing in XDR Strains. Microb Pathog. 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42331072/

[2] Fahim MFA, Banik B, Pranto PS, et al. Transportation welfare under commercial conditions: A multifactorial assessment of stress physiology, meat quality, and microbial load in broiler chickens. Poult Sci. 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42330766/

[3] Goel A, Ncho CM, Jeong CM, et al. Dietary polyphenols from shredded, steam-exploded pine particles mitigate the adverse effects of heat stress in broiler chickens. Poult Sci. 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42330763/

[4] Abedini Chamgordani S, Rezaei M, Neyriz Naghadehi M. Investigating Campylobacter Contamination of Broiler Chicken in Isfahan Province (Iran) and Evaluating the Antibiotic Resistance Patterns of the Isolates. Vet Med Int. 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42327974/

[5] Deng B, Wang X, Li M, et al. A novel therapeutic strategy for Mycoplasma synoviae infection: Elucidating the synergistic effects and underlying mechanisms of Tilmicosin and Sinomenine. Poult Sci. 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42308745/

[6] Liu H, Yang A, Wei X, et al. Preventive effects and underlying mechanisms of Ilex rotunda Thunb.-Cyperus rotundus L. herb pair extract on avian colibacillosis in chickens. Poult Sci. 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42308740/

[7] Li Y, Xue Y, Quan Y, et al. Direct interaction between avian pathogenic Escherichia coli and H9N2 avian influenza virus promotes bacterial adhesion during their infections. Microbiol Spectr. 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42294695/

[8] Qumar S, Hamad M, AbuOdeh R, et al. Comprehensive genomic insights into lineages, virulence, and antibiotic resistance profiles of Campylobacter jejuni entailing a global One Health scenario. Gut Pathog. 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42288821/

[9] Kingshuk MMR, Alam SB, Rahman MS, et al. The Landscape of Salmonella enterica Serovar Gallinarum-Pullorum Antimicrobial Resistance in Bangladesh's Poultry Industry: A Combined Phenotypic and Molecular Study. Microbiologyopen. 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42271175/

[10] Pham HT, Nguyen TH, Lam THA, et al. Detection of viable and VBNC Salmonella in retail meat using optimized PMAxx real-time PCR. J Microbiol Methods. 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42229763/

[11] Xie L, Xia Y, Shen R, et al. Establishment of an indirect ELISA method for detecting Salmonella infection based on Sptp protein in poultry. J Microbiol Methods. 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42219045/

[12] Sun T, Liu Y, Li Y, et al. A hierarchical Bayesian approach to estimate the most probable number (MPN) concentration of Salmonella in raw chicken from qualitative data. Int J Food Microbiol. 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42155255/

[13] Cartelo LA, Salhi O, Boumahdi Merad Z, et al. Occurrence, antimicrobial resistance and molecular characterization of Salmonella spp. from broiler chickens in Northern Algeria. Braz J Microbiol. 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42149349/ *** Disclaimer: This article is for educational and informational purposes only. It is not intended to substitute for professional veterinary advice, diagnosis, treatment, or regulatory guidance. Always consult a licensed veterinarian or qualified specialist regarding animal health, disease diagnosis, and therapeutic decisions.

[14] Wang R, Chen H. Metagenomic insights into vertical migration of soil antibiotic and metal(loid) resistance genes under long-term organic fertilizer application and irrigation. J Hazard Mater. 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42184529/

[15] Ivanov I, Takkinen HK, Takkinen J, et al. Sources of Human Campylobacteriosis Cases in Estonia and the Genomic Associations with Broiler Chicken Meat Isolates. Pathogens. 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42198665/

[16] Marcu D, Balta I, Gundogdu O, et al. Organic acids impede Salmonella infection of chicken macrophage-like cell line (HD11) by modulating itaconate gene expression. Avian Pathol. 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42159720/

[17] Xu T, Liu Q, Wu Q, et al. Comprehensive investigation of Lpt-targeting antimicrobial peptide Thanatin for sterilization and preservation in foods. Food Res Int. 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42270230/

[18] Li H, Shi C, Aziz T, et al. Investigation of the interaction between phloretin and Staphylococcus aureus toxin proteins and its application in chicken meat. Food Chem. 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42190376/

[19] Li Y, Lu Y, Zhang Z, et al. Dehydroacetic acid disrupts cold adaptation and biofilm formation in Pseudomonas lundensis: A targeted strategy for enhancing microbiological safety of refrigerated poultry. Food Microbiol. 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42215219/

[20] Jing Y, Shen X, Yin D, et al. The ecnAB toxin-antitoxin system modulates avian pathogenic Escherichia coli virulence through regulating the capsular sialic acid biosynthesis pathway. Vet Microbiol. 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42160786/

[21] Le YH, Hoang HTT, Khong DT, et al. High prevalence of atypical enteropathogenic Escherichia coli contaminating retail chicken meat in Vietnam: virulence gene profiles, sequence types, and antimicrobial resistance. J Infect Chemother. 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42162663/

[22] Tian Y, Zhang Y, Lu L, et al. Avian pathogenic Escherichia coli virulence protein Hcp2a induces incomplete autophagy in chicken HD11 cells. Poult Sci. 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42155397/

[23] Rodrigo CH, Kulappu Arachchige SN, Bushell RN, et al. Complex pathogen interactions in upper respiratory tract infections in commercial free-range layers: A cross-sectional study. Vet Microbiol. 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42190304/

[24] Ferrandis-Vila M, Mamerow S, Bootsma M, et al. Intestinal colonization of weaner pigs by extended-spectrum-β-lactamase-encoding Escherichia coli classified for differential host-association using a phylogenetics-based approach. Sci Rep. 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42270713/

[25] Kim JI, Choi JH, Ali MS, et al. Evolutionary trends and genetic determinants of third-generation cephalosporin resistance in Escherichia coli from Korean livestock: a 14-year longitudinal study, 2010-2023. Front Microbiol. 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42182036/

[26] Duc HM, Lan NT, Hoa TTK, et al. Toxinotyping, Antibiotic Resistance Profile, and In Vitro Bio-Control of Clostridium perfringens Type G Isolated from Chickens with Necrotic Enteritis by Lytic Bacteriophages. Antibiotics (Basel). 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42192675/

[27] Yamamoto S, Lee K-i, Kubomura A, et al. Genome-scale dissection of phase-variable gene function in Campylobacter jejuni using a stabilized phasotype library. mSphere. 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42267837/

[28] Xiang DF, Narindoshvili T, Raushel FM. Elucidation of the Pathway for the Biosynthesis of the Undecorated Capsular Polysaccharide from the HS:19 Serotype of the Human Pathogen Campylobacter jejuni. Biochemistry. 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42241030/

[29] Lee YH, Ali MS, Moon BY, et al. Longitudinal surveillance and molecular characterization of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) from livestock carcasses in South Korea: A 12-year nationwide study (2013-2024). Food Microbiol. 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42215217/

[30] Szafraniec GM, Chrobak-Chmiel D, Adamczyk K, et al. Phenotypic and genotypic characterization of antimicrobial resistance in coagulase-negative staphylococci from bone lesions in broiler chickens. BMC Vet Res. 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42192425/

[31] Shelkamy MMS, Fay C, Hashish A, et al. Investigating the pathogenicity of novel non-pathogenic Avibacterium paragallinarum isolates and their protective potential against infectious coryza. Avian Pathol. 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42210853/

[32] Kim Y, Kim JK, Her M, et al. Shotgun Metagenomic Diagnosis of Unidentified Pathogens in Hepatic Necrosis Samples from Samgye Chickens. Avian Pathol. 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42212564/

[33] Sivasubramaniam P, Alagarsamy K, Michael MM, et al. IgY technology (egg yolk antibodies) in respiratory medicine: applications and future prospects. Arch Microbiol. 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42262426/

[34] Kober L, von Karger L, Castiglione K. Mixture dependent correlation patterns in antibacterial and cytotoxic activities of five hop isolates. Sci Rep. 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42225839/

[35] Kanwal B, Asif E, Kalhoro NH, et al. Prevalence of Antimicrobial-Resistant Bacterial Pathogens Among Livestock in Subtropical Environments. Antibiotics (Basel). 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42192683/