Bacterial Pathogens in Chickens: Salmonella and Escherichia coli Infections

Introduction

Salmonella and Escherichia coli represent the two most significant bacterial pathogen groups affecting commercial poultry worldwide. These organisms cause substantial economic losses through mortality, reduced performance, and carcass condemnations. They also serve as major reservoirs for foodborne zoonoses. Understanding the complex biology of these pathogens, their interactions with the avian host, and the factors driving antimicrobial resistance is critical for effective control programs. This article provides a detailed review of the etiology, epidemiology, pathogenesis, diagnostics, treatment, and control of Salmonella and avian pathogenic Escherichia coli (APEC) infections in chickens, with an emphasis on recent molecular and genomic insights.

Etiology and Taxonomy of Salmonella in Chickens

Salmonella enterica subspecies enterica encompasses over 2,500 serovars, many of which are capable of infecting poultry [1]. Serovars are classified based on somatic (O) and flagellar (H) antigens. In chickens, the most clinically relevant serovars include the host-adapted S. enterica serovar Gallinarum (which causes fowl typhoid), S. enterica serovar Pullorum (which causes pullorum disease), and the broad-host-range serovars S. enterica serovar Typhimurium and S. enterica serovar Enteritidis, which are frequently associated with subclinical intestinal carriage and egg contamination [2]. The emergence of multidrug-resistant (MDR) and extensively drug-resistant (XDR) strains has become a pressing concern. Molecular profiling of XDR Salmonella isolates from hatchery environments has revealed the presence of class 1 integron gene cassettes linked to resistance determinants, including those encoding beta-lactamases and aminoglycoside-modifying enzymes [3]. Whole-genome sequencing efforts have further characterized the distribution of plasmid-mediated cephalosporin resistance genes such as blaCTX-M and blaCMY among Salmonella serovars in poultry [4].

Pathogenesis of Salmonella Infection

Salmonella infection in chickens begins with oral ingestion of the organism. Following transit through the proventriculus and gizzard, bacteria adhere to and invade the epithelial cells of the cecum and ileum. The type III secretion system 1 (T3SS-1), encoded by pathogenicity island 1 (SPI-1), is essential for injecting effector proteins into host cells that trigger cytoskeletal rearrangements and bacterial internalization [5]. Once internalized, Salmonella resides within a modified phagosome known as the Salmonella-containing vacuole (SCV). The type III secretion system 2 (T3SS-2), encoded by SPI-2, is required for intracellular survival and replication. Intracellular replication within macrophages is a hallmark of systemic infection. The host protein SIRT1 has been shown to negatively regulate immune responses to Salmonella, thereby attenuating host resistance [6]. Organic acids such as butyrate can impede Salmonella infection in chicken macrophage-like HD11 cells by modulating the expression of itaconate-related genes, thereby enhancing antimicrobial activity [7].

Following systemic dissemination, Salmonella can colonize the liver, spleen, bone marrow, and reproductive tract. In laying hens, colonization of the ovarian follicles and oviduct leads to transovarian transmission and the production of contaminated eggs. The ability of certain serovars to persist in the reproductive tract without causing clinical signs is a critical factor in vertical transmission.

Etiology and Pathotypes of Escherichia coli in Chickens

Escherichia coli is a commensal inhabitant of the chicken intestinal tract, but specific pathotypes cause significant disease. Avian pathogenic E. coli (APEC) is the primary causative agent of colibacillosis, a syndrome encompassing airsacculitis, pericarditis, perihepatitis, salpingitis, and coligranuloma [8, 9, 10]. APEC strains are characterized by the presence of specific virulence genes encoding adhesins (e.g., type 1 fimbriae, P fimbriae), iron acquisition systems (e.g., aerobactin, salmochelin), protectins (e.g., lipopolysaccharide, capsular polysaccharide K1), and toxins (e.g., hemolysin HlyE, vacuolating autotransporter toxin) [11, 12, 13]. The virulence protein Hcp2a, a component of the type VI secretion system (T6SS), induces incomplete autophagy in chicken HD11 macrophages, facilitating intracellular survival [14]. Extracellular vesicles (EVs) carrying the HlyE variant (HlyE-V) from APEC induce mitochondria-dependent apoptosis in HD11 cells, mediated through caspase-3 and caspase-9 activation [13]. The ecnAB toxin-antitoxin system modulates APEC virulence by regulating the capsular sialic acid biosynthesis pathway [11]. Small non-coding RNAs such as RyfA and TimR play a role in stress resistance and virulence in APEC [10]. The zoonotic potential of some APEC serotypes is linked to the specificity of P-like fimbrial (PLF) adhesins [12].

Atypical enteropathogenic E. coli (aEPEC) strains, which lack the bundle-forming pilus (BFP) but carry the intimin gene eae, have been detected at high prevalence in retail chicken meat. These strains harbor diverse sequence types and antimicrobial resistance profiles [15]. Commensal E. coli from poultry also serve as reservoirs for extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) genes [16].

Coinfections and Host Interactions

Salmonella and APEC infections can be exacerbated by concurrent viral infections. Direct interaction between APEC and H9N2 avian influenza virus promotes bacterial adhesion during coinfection, likely mediated by alterations in host cell surface receptor expression [17]. The presence of gut microbiota signatures is associated with the development of Salmonella Typhimurium super-shedders in broiler chickens; certain microbial community structures correlate with high levels of fecal shedding [18].

Epidemiology and Transmission

Salmonella

The epidemiology of Salmonella in poultry involves both vertical and horizontal transmission routes. Vertical transmission via the egg is a key pathway for S. Enteritidis and S. Pullorum [1, 2]. Horizontal transmission occurs through the fecal-oral route, contaminated feed, water, litter, and fomites. Hatchery environments are a critical control point, as dead-in-shell eggs and hatchery debris can harbor XDR Salmonella strains [3]. A hierarchical Bayesian modeling approach has been used to estimate the most probable number (MPN) concentration of Salmonella in raw chicken from qualitative data, providing refined risk assessments [19]. Prevalence surveys in broiler flocks in Northern Algeria have identified a high occurrence of Salmonella, with significant antimicrobial resistance detected [20]. The landscape of antimicrobial resistance in S. Gallinarum-Pullorum in Bangladesh reveals a combination of phenotypic and genotypic resistance [1].

Escherichia coli

APEC is ubiquitous in poultry environments. Transmission occurs primarily through inhalation of contaminated dust and feces, leading to respiratory tract colonization that can progress to systemic infection. Colibacillosis is often secondary to immunosuppressive conditions, mycoplasma infections, or environmental stressors. Commensal E. coli can acquire virulence genes through horizontal gene transfer. Retail chicken meat can serve as a reservoir for emerging antibiotic-resistant pathotypes of E. coli, even in pristine areas free from agricultural activity, highlighting the role of imported meat in disseminating resistance [21].

Clinical Signs and Pathology

Salmonellosis

Acute infections with S. Gallinarum or S. Pullorum cause septicemia, leading to depression, anorexia, diarrhea, and high mortality in young chicks. In older birds, fowl typhoid presents with anemia, pallor of the comb and wattles, and hepatomegaly with bronze discoloration of the liver. Mortality can be variable but may exceed 50% in susceptible flocks. Chronic carriers exhibit no overt signs but shed Salmonella intermittently in feces and eggs.

Colibacillosis

Colibacillosis in broilers typically presents as an acute to subacute disease. Clinical signs include depression, ruffled feathers, respiratory distress (dyspnea, rales), and increased flock mortality. Airsacculitis is the most common lesion, with thickened, cloudy, and caseous air sacs. Pericarditis and perihepatitis are hallmark fibrinous lesions. In layers, salpingitis is common, characterized by inflammation and accumulation of caseous exudate in the oviduct. Coligranuloma (Hjarre's disease) presents as granulomatous nodules in the liver, ceca, and duodenum. Avian pathogenic E. coli can also cause cellulitis and swollen head syndrome. Virulent APEC strains induce characteristic pathological changes, including the formation of a fibrinous exudate, indicative of a robust but ineffective host inflammatory response. Chicken e coli poop may be observed as watery or mucoid diarrhea in affected birds. The presence of chicken necrosis, or necrotic lesions in internal organs, is a frequent post-mortem finding in severe colibacillosis.

Molecular Diagnostics

Accurate and rapid detection of Salmonella and APEC is essential for effective control. Multiple molecular diagnostic platforms have been developed.

A one-step multiplex PCR has been established for the accurate detection and differentiation of Salmonella Gallinarum biovars Pullorum and Gallinarum [2]. This assay targets specific genomic regions and can differentiate the two biovars from other Salmonella serovars. An indirect ELISA based on the Sptp protein has been developed for detecting Salmonella infection in poultry, offering a serological surveillance tool [22]. The use of a PCR-enhanced fluorescence biosensor employing upconversion nanoparticles (UCNPs) coupled with tungsten disulfide nanosheets (WS2) enables rapid detection of Salmonella Typhimurium based on a dual quenching-dual recovery mechanism [23]. This biosensor can achieve detection limits suitable for food safety applications.

Genomic characterization of APEC has highlighted its potential as a marker organism for antimicrobial resistance surveillance. Whole-genome sequence analysis can identify resistance genes, virulence determinants, and phylogenetic relationships, informing control strategies [24]. Comparative genomic analysis of XDR APEC strains has identified novel mechanisms of resistance [9].

Treatment and Antimicrobial Resistance

Antimicrobial therapy for salmonellosis and colibacillosis has been severely compromised by the emergence and spread of multidrug-resistant strains. High levels of resistance to fluoroquinolones, cephalosporins, and aminoglycosides have been reported globally [1, 4]. Fluoroquinolone-resistant APEC has been isolated from asymptomatic broiler chickens at slaughter [25]. Whole-genome analysis of ESBL-producing E. coli from poultry in Turkey reveals a high prevalence of blaCTX-M genes and diverse plasmid replicon types [16]. The global prevalence and distribution of cephalosporin resistance mechanisms, including blaCTX-M, blaCMY, and blaSHV, in Salmonella have been characterized through genome-wide association studies [4].

A number of alternative strategies are under investigation. Lytic bacteriophages have shown efficacy against Salmonella in different food matrices and in broilers, reducing colonization and contamination [26, 27]. Phage therapy has also been evaluated against Salmonella Pullorum, demonstrating potential to combat intracellular infection [28]. Antimicrobial peptides identified through artificial intelligence (AI) screening have been evaluated for safety and efficacy against APEC in broilers [29]. Probiotics and synbiotic supplementation provide protective effects against Salmonella Typhimurium infection in young broilers, reducing colonization and modulating the gut microbiota [30]. Dietary supplementation with Bacillus subtilis can reduce general infection with Salmonella Pullorum [31].

Vaccination and Immunoprophylaxis

Vaccination remains a cornerstone of Salmonella and E. coli control. Killed whole-cell vaccines and conjugate vaccines have been prepared against Salmonella Typhimurium, with conjugate vaccines inducing superior antibody responses in chickens [32]. For APEC, outer membrane protein (OMP) vaccines and whole-cell killed vaccines have been compared, with OMP-based vaccines providing better protection against heterologous challenge [33].

A novel vaccine platform uses APEC-derived bacterial biomimetic vesicles displaying the H9 subtype avian influenza virus HA1 protein, offering a dual-protection approach against both colibacillosis and avian influenza [34]. The combination of Ilex rotunda Thunb. and Cyperus rotundus L. herb pair extract has demonstrated preventive effects against avian colibacillosis, reducing clinical signs and pathological lesions [8]. Houttuynia cordata extract protects against Salmonella infection by targeting T3SS-1, thereby inhibiting bacterial invasion [5].

Control Strategies

Effective control of Salmonella and E. coli in commercial poultry requires a multi-faceted approach. Biosecurity measures are paramount, including strict sanitation of housing, equipment, and footwear; control of rodents, wild birds, and insects; and the use of all-in/all-out production systems. Hatchery hygiene is critical to prevent vertical transmission [3]. Feed and water can be treated with organic acids to reduce bacterial contamination. The use of competitive exclusion products, which introduce beneficial gut microbiota to newly hatched chicks, can reduce Salmonella colonization.

In the context of why does chicken have salmonella but not beef, the primary explanation lies in processing differences and the nature of carcass contamination. Chickens are processed through a series of common tanks (scalding, chilling) that can facilitate cross-contamination between carcasses. Additionally, the common practice of pooling eggs from multiple flocks in hatcheries creates opportunities for widespread dissemination. The chicken salmonella USDA refers to the regulatory framework administered by the United States Department of Agriculture's Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS) for Salmonella surveillance and control in poultry products.

Consumer awareness regarding undercooked chicken e coli and the question does chicken have e coli or salmonella is vital for food safety. Both organisms can contaminate raw poultry, and proper cooking to an internal temperature of 165°F (74 degrees Celsius) is necessary to kill these pathogens. Intestinal colonization means that chicken e coli poop is a major source of environmental contamination on farms.

Conclusions

Salmonella and Escherichia coli remain the most significant bacterial pathogens affecting modern poultry production. The evolution of multidrug resistance, the emergence of hypervirulent clones, and the complexity of host-pathogen interactions present ongoing challenges. A comprehensive understanding of the biology of these organisms, combined with robust molecular diagnostics, biosecurity, vaccination, and antimicrobial stewardship, is essential for sustaining flock health and reducing the risk of foodborne illness. Continued chicken bacteria news will likely focus on the spread of resistance genes, the development of novel intervention technologies such as bacteriophages and AI-identified antimicrobial peptides, and the refinement of detection and surveillance systems.

References

[1] Kingshuk MMR, Alam SB, Rahman MS, et al. The Landscape of Salmonella enterica Serovar Gallinarum-Pullorum Antimicrobial Resistance in Bangladesh's Poultry Industry: A Combined Phenotypic and Molecular Study. Microbiologyopen. 2026. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42271175/

[2] Xiong D, Yuan L, Fei X, et al. Establishment and application of a new one-step multiplex PCR for the accurate detection and differentiation of Salmonella Gallinarum biovars Pullorum and Gallinarum. BMC Vet Res. 2026. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41957795/

[3] Eidaroos NH, Khafagy AR, Eldein AE, et al. Virulence and Antimicrobial Resistance Gene Profiling of Salmonella Isolated from Dead-in-Shell Eggs and Hatchery Environments with Emphasis on Class 1 Integron Gene Cassette Sequencing in XDR Strains. Microb Pathog. 2026. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42331072/

[4] Yang Q, Zhang J, Chen T, et al. Global prevalence and distribution of bla-harboring Salmonella: A genome-wide association study of cephalosporin resistance mechanisms. Food Microbiol. 2026. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41963065/

[5] Wang T, Cai S, Zhang J, et al. Houttuynia cordata extract protects against Salmonella infection by targeting type III secretion system 1. Poult Sci. 2026. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42025005/

[6] Liu S, Gao Q, Zhang J, et al. SIRT1 Attenuates Host Resistance to Salmonella Infection by Negatively Regulating the Immune Responses. FASEB J. 2026. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42033180/

[7] Marcu D, Balta I, Gundogdu O, et al. Organic acids impede Salmonella infection of chicken macrophage-like cell line (HD11) by modulating itaconate gene expression. Avian Pathol. 2026. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42159720/

[8] Liu H, Yang A, Wei X, et al. Preventive effects and underlying mechanisms of Ilex rotunda Thunb.-Cyperus rotundus L. herb pair extract on avian colibacillosis in chickens. Poult Sci. 2026. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42308740/

[9] Ni W, Chen L, Chen H, et al. Genomic and Pathogenic Characterization of an Extensively Drug-Resistant Avian Pathogenic Escherichia coli Strain. Transbound Emerg Dis. 2026. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42147456/

[10] Anamalé C, Bessaiah H, Ng Kwan Lim E, et al. Orchestrating infection: the impact of RyfA and TimR sRNAs on stress resistance and virulence in avian pathogenic Escherichia coli in chickens. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2026. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42053318/

[11] Jing Y, Shen X, Yin D, et al. The ecnAB toxin-antitoxin system modulates avian pathogenic Escherichia coli virulence through regulating the capsular sialic acid biosynthesis pathway. Vet Microbiol. 2026. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42160786/

[12] Akrami F, Jamali H, Houle S, et al. Host range and zoonotic potential linked to P-like fimbrial (PLF) adhesin specificity in avian pathogenic Escherichia coli. PLoS Pathog. 2026. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41941531/

[13] Mou Y, Liang Y, Zhu D, et al. Extracellular vesicles (EVs) carrying hemolysin HlyE variant (HlyE-V) from avian pathogenic Escherichia coli (APEC) induce mitochondria-dependent apoptosis in HD11 macrophages. Microb Pathog. 2026. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41881168/ *** Disclaimer: This article is for educational and informational purposes only. It is not intended to substitute for professional veterinary advice, diagnosis, treatment, or regulatory guidance. Always consult a licensed veterinarian or qualified specialist regarding animal health, disease diagnosis, and therapeutic decisions.

[14] Tian Y, Zhang Y, Lu L, et al. Avian pathogenic Escherichia coli virulence protein Hcp2a induces incomplete autophagy in chicken HD11 cells. Poult Sci. 2026. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42155397/

[15] Le YH, Hoang HTT, Khong DT, et al. High prevalence of atypical enteropathogenic Escherichia coli contaminating retail chicken meat in Vietnam: virulence gene profiles, sequence types, and antimicrobial resistance. J Infect Chemother. 2026. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42162663/

[16] Şahin S, Celil Özaslan BG, Moğulkoç MN, et al. Antimicrobial resistance profiles and whole-genome sequence analysis of extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) production in commensal Escherichia coli from poultry in Türkiye. PLoS One. 2026. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41950196/

[17] Li Y, Xue Y, Quan Y, et al. Direct interaction between avian pathogenic Escherichia coli and H9N2 avian influenza virus promotes bacterial adhesion during their infections. Microbiol Spectr. 2026. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42294695/

[18] Liu Y, Meng L, Wang Y, et al. Gut microbiota signatures associated with the development of Salmonella Typhimurium super-shedders in broiler chickens. Poult Sci. 2026. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42119410/

[19] Sun T, Liu Y, Li Y, et al. A hierarchical Bayesian approach to estimate the most probable number (MPN) concentration of Salmonella in raw chicken from qualitative data. Int J Food Microbiol. 2026. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42155255/

[20] Cartelo LA, Salhi O, Boumahdi Merad Z, et al. Occurrence, antimicrobial resistance and molecular characterization of Salmonella spp. from broiler chickens in Northern Algeria. Braz J Microbiol. 2026. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42149349/

[21] Yi S, Alexander KA, Bywater A, et al. Imported Retail Beef and Chicken Meat Products Serve as Reservoirs for Emerging Antibiotic-Resistant Pathotypes of Escherichia coli in Pristine Areas Free From Agricultural Activity. Microbiologyopen. 2026. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41910070/

[22] Xie L, Xia Y, Shen R, et al. Establishment of an indirect ELISA method for detecting Salmonella infection based on Sptp protein in poultry. J Microbiol Methods. 2026. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42219045/

[23] Han L, Chen M, Huang Q, et al. A PCR-enhanced UCNPs-WS2 fluorescence biosensor via dual quenching-dual recovery mechanism for rapid detection of Salmonella typhimurium. Food Res Int. 2026. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42083239/

[24] Gaonkar PP, Golden R, Santana-Pereira ALR, et al. Genomic characterization of avian pathogenic Escherichia coli and its potential as a marker organism for antimicrobial resistance. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2026. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42080571/

[25] Yongyod R, Eiamsam-Ang T, Kamolrat N, et al. Fluoroquinolone-Resistant Avian Pathogenic Escherichia coli Isolated from Asymptomatic Broiler Chickens in a Slaughterhouse in Northern Thailand. Pathogens. 2026. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41901706/

[26] Li P, Wang X, Liu J, et al. Antibacterial efficacy of a broad lytic spectrum phage against Salmonella in different food matrices and broilers. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2026. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42142771/

[27] Wu L, Li P, Bai M, et al. Whole-genome analysis of a polyvalent Salmonella phage reveals its potential to combat intracellular infection and food contamination. Food Res Int. 2026. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41942208/

[28] Zhao H, You S, Fu J, et al. Phage therapy: A novel strategy to combat drug-resistant Salmonella Pullorum infection in chickens. Vet Microbiol. 2026. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42061220/

[29] Demirsoy E, Parkin TI, Mihalynuk SE, et al. Efficacy and safety evaluation of artificial intelligence-identified antimicrobial peptides targeting avian pathogenic Escherichia coli in broiler chickens. J Anim Sci Biotechnol. 2026. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42135842/

[30] Rivera Pérez W, Barquero Calvo E, Chaves Hernández A, et al. Protective Effect of Synbiotic Supplementation Against Salmonella Typhimurium Infection in Young Broiler Chickens. Animals (Basel). 2026. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42121830/

[31] Chen Y, Li H, Zhang X, et al. Dietary Bacillus subtilis Group Reduces the General Infection of Salmonella Pullorum in Broiler Chicken. Antibiotics (Basel). 2026. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42041352/

[32] Ahmad A, Yousaf Z, Naeem M, et al. Preparation and comparative evaluation of conjugate and whole-cell killed vaccine candidates against Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium. Vaccine. 2026. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42090745/

[33] Wani BM, Kamil SA, Shah SA, et al. Comparative evaluation of outer membrane protein and whole cell antigen vaccine against avian pathogen Escherichia coli infection in broiler chicken. Iran J Microbiol. 2026. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42112298/

[34] Li Y, Quan Y, Quan K, et al. Construction and immunogenicity evaluation of avian Escherichia coli-derived bacterial biomimetic vesicles displaying H9 subtype avian influenza virus HA1 protein. Vet Microbiol. 2026. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42061219/