What is Dr. Zubair Khalid's research focus?

Dr. Zubair Khalid specializes in molecular virology, mRNA vaccine development, and computational biology, with a focus on avian pathogens like IBDV and Avian Reovirus.

Where is Dr. Zubair Khalid currently working?

Dr. Zubair Khalid is a Postdoctoral Research Associate at the University of Maryland (UMD), specifically within the Department of Animal and Avian Sciences.

Bacteria on Chicken: Common Pathogens and Mitigation in Poultry Production

Introduction

Poultry production represents the fastest growing sector in global meat supply, driven by increasing demand for affordable protein sources [64]. The intensification of poultry farming has created ecological niches that favor the proliferation of bacterial pathogens, both as agents of clinical disease in flocks and as contaminants of carcasses at slaughter [64]. Bacterial colonization of chicken skin, gastrointestinal tract, and respiratory epithelium occurs through multiple routes including vertical transmission from breeder flocks, horizontal transmission via contaminated feed and water, and environmental persistence in litter and biofilms [46, 55]. The resulting bacterial burden on chicken meat and eggs constitutes a major food safety concern, with Salmonella enterica, Campylobacter jejuni, and avian pathogenic Escherichia coli (APEC) representing the most frequently isolated organisms [64, 33]. This review provides an exhaustive examination of the major bacterial pathogens associated with chickens, their virulence mechanisms, antimicrobial resistance profiles, and the spectrum of mitigation strategies available to the poultry industry.

Major Bacterial Pathogens Colonizing Chickens

Salmonella enterica

Salmonella enterica remains the most extensively studied bacterial pathogen in poultry due to its zoonotic potential and economic impact [1, 64]. Over 2,500 serovars of Salmonella enterica have been described, with Salmonella Enteritidis and Salmonella Typhimurium being the most frequently associated with human salmonellosis from poultry sources [36, 42]. In poultry flocks, Salmonella infection can manifest as clinical disease (pullorum disease caused by Salmonella Pullorum and fowl typhoid caused by Salmonella Gallinarum) or as asymptomatic intestinal carriage that leads to carcass contamination at processing [1, 33]. The pathogenicity of Salmonella is mediated by two type III secretion systems (T3SS-1 and T3SS-2) encoded on Salmonella pathogenicity islands (SPI-1 and SPI-2), which inject effector proteins into host cells to facilitate invasion and intracellular survival [1, 69]. Biofilm formation on poultry processing equipment and in domestic kitchen environments further complicates control efforts, as Salmonella biofilms exhibit enhanced tolerance to disinfectants and desiccation [53].

The emergence of multidrug-resistant (MDR) Salmonella serovars has been documented globally. In the United States poultry production chain, mobile genetic elements including integrative conjugative elements and plasmids drive the evolution and dissemination of MDR Salmonella Infantis [2]. In Bangladesh, serovar-specific antimicrobial resistance profiling revealed high rates of resistance to tetracyclines, sulfonamides, and beta-lactams among poultry isolates [42]. Extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) producing Salmonella Enteritidis carrying blaCTX-M-15 on hybrid transposons Tn1721/Tn21 have been reported in South Korea, demonstrating the genetic plasticity of resistance determinants [71]. The clonal expansion of Salmonella Thompson co-resistant to clinically important antibiotics in China between 1997 and 2020 illustrates the temporal evolution of resistance in poultry-associated lineages [77].

Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli

Campylobacter species, particularly Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli, are the leading bacterial causes of human gastroenteritis in many developed countries, with poultry identified as the primary reservoir [64, 39]. Campylobacter colonizes the avian intestinal tract, particularly the ceca, reaching densities of 10^6 to 10^9 CFU per gram of cecal content without causing clinical disease in chickens [66]. The organism's corkscrew morphology and polar flagella confer high motility in viscous mucus, facilitating chemotaxis toward mucin and bile acids [66]. Horizontal transmission within flocks is rapid, with colonization spreading from a few seeded birds to the entire flock within days [49]. Clonal spread and persistence of Campylobacter in Danish broiler farms has been linked to specific genotypes that also appear in human clinical cases, confirming the epidemiological link between poultry colonization and human disease [49].

Campylobacter exhibits a high degree of genetic diversity, and its natural competence for DNA uptake facilitates the acquisition of antimicrobial resistance genes [59]. Resistance to fluoroquinolones and macrolides, the drugs of choice for human campylobacteriosis, has increased substantially in poultry isolates worldwide [59, 47]. In Egypt, molecular detection of antibiotic-resistant Campylobacter from broiler and layer chickens revealed high prevalence of resistance to ciprofloxacin and tetracycline, with the tet(O) gene being the most commonly identified resistance determinant [59].

Avian Pathogenic Escherichia coli (APEC)

Avian pathogenic Escherichia coli (APEC) is the causative agent of colibacillosis, a complex disease syndrome encompassing respiratory infection, septicemia, pericarditis, perihepatitis, and salpingitis in laying hens [52, 56]. APEC strains belong predominantly to phylogenetic groups B2 and D and possess a characteristic set of virulence-associated genes including those encoding F1 and P fimbriae, aerobactin siderophore systems, and the Iss protein (increased serum survival) [3, 52]. The host range and zoonotic potential of APEC are linked to P-like fimbrial (PLF) adhesin specificity, with certain PLF variants enabling adherence to both avian and human epithelial cells [3]. Genomic epidemiology of APEC in Finnish broiler colibacillosis outbreaks revealed that specific clones, particularly those belonging to sequence type ST117, are vertically transferred from breeder flocks to broiler progeny [30, 56].

The interaction between APEC and respiratory viruses such as infectious bronchitis virus (IBV) and H9N2 avian influenza virus is well documented [4, 35]. Direct interaction between APEC and H9N2 avian influenza virus promotes bacterial adhesion during co-infection, likely through virus-induced exposure of host cell receptors [4]. Co-infection models of IBV and Escherichia coli have been used to establish salpingitis in layer chickens for evaluating therapeutic interventions [35]. APEC also demonstrates the ability to form bacterial biomimetic vesicles that can be engineered for vaccine delivery, as demonstrated by the construction of APEC-derived vesicles displaying H9 subtype avian influenza virus HA1 protein [5].

Clostridium perfringens

Clostridium perfringens type A and type G (formerly type C) are the etiological agents of necrotic enteritis in broiler chickens, a disease of major economic importance [73, 74]. The primary virulence factor is NetB, a pore-forming toxin that causes necrosis of intestinal villi, leading to decreased nutrient absorption and increased intestinal permeability [73]. Predisposing factors for necrotic enteritis include dietary composition (particularly high levels of non-starch polysaccharides), coccidial infection (Eimeria species), and immunosuppression [73]. Subclinical necrotic enteritis, characterized by mild intestinal lesions without overt mortality, is increasingly recognized as a cause of production losses due to impaired feed conversion [73]. Clostridium perfringens also produces several other toxins including alpha-toxin (CPA) and TpeL, though their roles in avian disease are less clearly defined [73].

Staphylococcus aureus

Staphylococcus aureus is a significant cause of lameness in broilers through its role in bacterial chondronecrosis with osteomyelitis (BCO) and sternal bursitis [82, 6]. The pathogenesis involves colonization of the respiratory tract or skin, followed by hematogenous spread to the growth plates of the proximal femur and tibiotarsus [82]. S. aureus isolates from poultry exhibit a high degree of genetic complexity, with CC5 lineage strains carrying multiple virulence genes including those encoding enterotoxins, hemolysins, and biofilm-associated proteins [82]. Biofilm formation is a critical virulence attribute, enabling persistence on poultry processing equipment and in the farm environment [82]. Antimicrobial resistance profiling of S. aureus from raw poultry in Algeria revealed high prevalence of methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) with multidrug resistance phenotypes [27].

Mycoplasma gallisepticum and Mycoplasma synoviae

Mycoplasma gallisepticum and Mycoplasma synoviae are cell wall deficient bacteria that cause chronic respiratory disease and infectious synovitis in chickens, respectively [7, 32, 50]. M. gallisepticum is transmitted both vertically (through the egg) and horizontally via respiratory aerosols, with hatchery contamination playing a critical role in dissemination [55]. The organism lacks a cell wall, rendering beta-lactam antibiotics ineffective, and its small genome (approximately 1.0 Mb) limits metabolic capacity, necessitating a parasitic lifestyle [50]. Mycoplasma species form biofilms that enhance their survival in the environment and resistance to disinfectants [50]. Molecular diagnostics for Mycoplasma have advanced substantially, with multiplex TaqMan real-time PCR assays enabling differential identification of wild-type and vaccine strains of M. gallisepticum [7]. Rapid nucleic acid detection platforms based on recombinase-aided amplification (RAA) combined with CRISPR/Cas12a have been developed for both M. gallisepticum and M. synoviae, offering field-deployable diagnostic capability [25, 32].

Other Notable Pathogens

Several other bacterial species contribute to the microbial burden on chicken carcasses and in poultry production environments. Proteus mirabilis has been isolated from retail meat sources and broiler chickens, with isolates exhibiting virulence factors including urease production, hemolysin activity, and biofilm formation [8, 37]. Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a common contaminant of poultry meat, with isolates from food sources showing high prevalence of virulence genes (exoS, exoT, exoU) and resistance to carbapenems [9, 38]. Klebsiella pneumoniae has been identified on food products, with genomic analyses revealing the presence of both resistance and virulence determinants that pose a potential risk to human health [48, 70]. Enterococcus species, including Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus asini, are increasingly recognized as reservoirs of antimicrobial resistance genes, including the linezolid resistance genes optrA and poxtA [10, 6]. Avibacterium paragallinarum, the causative agent of infectious coryza, has been the subject of enhanced epidemiological typing through genome-guided multilocus sequence typing (MLST) schemes [11].

Antimicrobial Resistance in Poultry Bacterial Pathogens

The widespread use of antimicrobial agents in poultry production has driven the emergence and dissemination of resistance determinants among bacterial populations [67, 78]. A systematic review and meta-analysis of antimicrobial resistance in meat and meat products from Asia revealed high pooled prevalence of resistance to tetracyclines, sulfonamides, and beta-lactams in poultry isolates [47]. In the United States, investigation of antimicrobial resistance in important pathogens isolated from poultry between 2015 and 2023 documented increasing trends in resistance to fluoroquinolones and third-generation cephalosporins among Salmonella and Campylobacter isolates [78].

The genetic basis of antimicrobial resistance in poultry bacteria is diverse and includes both chromosomal mutations and horizontally acquired resistance genes. Mobile genetic elements, including plasmids, transposons, and integrative conjugative elements, play a central role in the dissemination of resistance genes [2, 57, 61]. Whole genome analysis of plasmid reservoirs in commercial chicken farms in China revealed the distribution and diversity of plasmids carrying carbapenemase genes (blaNDM) and colistin resistance genes (mcr) [61]. The emergence of carbapenem-resistant gram-negative bacteria from poultry in Tamil Nadu, India, represents a particularly concerning development given the clinical importance of carbapenems in human medicine [28]. Extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) producing Escherichia coli have been detected in broiler chickens in Morocco, with blaCTX-M-15 being the predominant ESBL gene [76].

Colistin resistance, mediated by the mcr genes, has been detected in Escherichia coli isolates from poultry in multiple countries [60, 61]. Phenotypic tests for colistin resistance show variable performance, with broth microdilution remaining the reference method [60]. The co-occurrence of blaNDM and mcr genes on the same plasmid in poultry isolates is a particularly alarming finding, as it limits therapeutic options for infections caused by these organisms [61].

Mitigation Strategies

Biosecurity and Management Practices

Biosecurity measures form the foundation of bacterial pathogen control in poultry production. These include all-in/all-out production systems, cleaning and disinfection of houses between flocks, control of rodents and wild birds, and treatment of drinking water [66, 46]. Water quality history significantly influences the microbial composition of litter and water line biofilm in broiler farms, with farms using well water showing different bacterial communities compared to those using municipal water [46]. Hatchery sanitation is critical for controlling vertically transmitted pathogens such as Mycoplasma gallisepticum and Salmonella Pullorum [55].

Bacteriophage Therapy

Bacteriophages (phages) have emerged as a promising alternative to antibiotics for controlling bacterial pathogens in poultry [12, 13, 14, 15, 62, 74]. Phages are viruses that specifically infect bacteria, offering the advantage of target specificity without disrupting the beneficial gut microbiota [13]. Whole genome analysis of a polyvalent Salmonella phage revealed its potential to combat intracellular infection and food contamination, with the phage demonstrating the ability to infect multiple Salmonella serovars [12]. Phage vB_EcoM_GXW16 has been isolated and characterized for its therapeutic potential against drug-resistant APEC strains, showing efficacy in reducing bacterial load in experimentally infected chickens [14]. Phage-based approaches have also been developed for decontaminating poultry feed, with effective reduction of Salmonella contamination in feed matrices [15]. In broiler chickens challenged with necrotic enteritis, bacteriophage supplementation improved performance and gut health parameters [74]. The effect of bacteriophages on growth performance and health indicators in broiler chickens in the absence of bacterial challenge has been reviewed, with generally favorable outcomes reported [13].

Probiotics and Competitive Exclusion

Probiotics, defined as live microorganisms that confer health benefits when administered in adequate amounts, have been extensively studied for their ability to reduce pathogen colonization in poultry [16, 34, 58, 64, 68, 75]. The mechanisms of action include competitive exclusion (occupying adhesion sites on intestinal epithelium), production of antimicrobial substances (organic acids, bacteriocins, hydrogen peroxide), and modulation of host immune responses [64, 68]. Lactobacillus species, including Lactobacillus reuteri and Lactiplantibacillus plantarum, have shown efficacy against Salmonella Typhimurium and APEC in broiler chickens [34, 58, 75]. A recombinant Lactobacillus-based multicomponent vaccine against Campylobacter jejuni has been developed, with the vaccine strain potentially promoting a healthier microbial balance in the poultry gut [16]. Host-associated probiotics, including Lactobacillus reuteri and Enterococcus faecium, have been shown to mitigate multidrug-resistant Salmonella enterica in broiler chicks [75]. Saccharomyces cerevisiae fermentation products and phytogenic feed additives have demonstrated efficacy as alternatives to antibiotic growth promoters, reducing pathogen load and improving intestinal morphology in commercial broiler chickens [68].

Phytogenic Compounds and Herbal Extracts

Phytogenic feed additives, derived from plants and herbs, have gained attention as natural antimicrobial agents for poultry [65, 69, 79, 80]. These compounds contain bioactive molecules including essential oils, flavonoids, tannins, and saponins that exert antimicrobial effects through multiple mechanisms including disruption of bacterial cell membranes, inhibition of quorum sensing, and interference with type III secretion systems [65, 69]. Houttuynia cordata extract protects against Salmonella infection by targeting T3SS-1, thereby inhibiting bacterial invasion of host cells [69]. Andrographolide and ajwain have been synthesized and pharmacologically evaluated as promising alternatives to antibiotics for treating Salmonella Gallinarum infection in chickens [79]. Cinnamon, rosemary, and oregano have been evaluated for their effects on growth performance and Campylobacter jejuni colonization in broiler chickens, with oregano showing the most consistent antimicrobial activity [80]. Herbal extracts and constituent bioactive compounds have been reviewed for their mitigation potential against Salmonella in meat-type poultry [65].

Vaccination

Vaccination strategies for bacterial pathogens in poultry include live attenuated vaccines, bacterins, and recombinant vaccines [16, 5, 1, 54]. Live Salmonella vaccines, including those based on attenuated Salmonella Typhimurium strains, are used to reduce intestinal colonization and shedding [1]. The interaction between diet and vaccination has been explored, with studies showing that dietary iron supplementation influences the efficacy of Salmonella vaccination and shapes the poultry gut microbiota [17]. For APEC, bacterial biomimetic vesicles displaying heterologous antigens have been constructed as a novel vaccine platform [5]. Induction of trained immunity in broiler chickens through in ovo delivery of CpG oligodeoxynucleotides combined with intrapulmonary delivery of a live Clostridium perfringens vaccine at hatch has been shown to protect against Escherichia coli septicemia later in the grow-out period [54].

Organic Acids and Chemical Interventions

Organic acids, including citric acid, peroxyacetic acid, and sulfuric acid, are used as antimicrobial interventions during poultry processing [83]. A citric acid/hydrochloric acid blend, peroxyacetic acid, and sulfuric acid have demonstrated efficacy against Salmonella and background microbiota on chicken hearts and livers [83]. Peracetic acid tolerance in Salmonella Typhimurium has been investigated through functional dissection of the genome, revealing genes involved in oxidative stress response and membrane repair that contribute to survival [18]. Washing chicken carcasses with water has proven unreliable as a means of reducing bacterial contamination in unhygienic market conditions, highlighting the need for more effective chemical interventions [51].

Nanotechnology-Based Approaches

Nanoparticles have been investigated for their antibacterial properties against poultry pathogens [19]. Nanocobalt particles have demonstrated antibacterial efficacy against multidrug-resistant Enterococcus species and Pasteurella species isolated from broiler chickens [19]. The development of contactless gas-sensitive photoelectrochemical biosensors based on SnO2/CeO2 heterojunctions represents a novel approach for detection of Salmonella Typhimurium, with potential applications in monitoring contamination during processing [20].

Diagnostic Approaches

Accurate and rapid detection of bacterial pathogens is essential for effective control programs. Traditional culture-based methods remain the gold standard for isolation and identification, but molecular methods offer increased sensitivity and speed [7, 25, 32, 36]. Real-time PCR assays, including multiplex formats, enable simultaneous detection of multiple pathogens [7]. Recombinase-aided amplification combined with CRISPR/Cas12a provides a field-deployable platform for detection of Mycoplasma species [25, 32]. Dual recombinase polymerase amplification combined with lateral flow dipstick (RPA-LFD) has been developed for rapid detection of Salmonella Pullorum and Salmonella Enteritidis [36]. Metagenomic profiling using high-throughput sequencing has revealed extensive bacterial diversity in chicken manure and associated contaminated wastewater, providing insights into the microbial ecology of poultry production environments [21].

flowchart TD
    A["Sample Collection: Cecal content, carcass swab, litter, feed"] --> B[Initial Processing]
    B --> C1[Selective Enrichment<br>Buffered Peptone Water<br>Preston Broth]
    B --> C2[Direct Plating<br>XLD, MacConkey, mCCDA]
    C1 --> D[Subculture on Selective Agar]
    C2 --> D
    D --> E[Presumptive Identification<br>Colony Morphology, Gram Stain, Oxidase/Catalase]
    E --> F1[Biochemical Confirmation<br>API 20E, VITEK 2]
    E --> F2[Serological Typing<br>Salmonella O/H antisera]
    E --> F3[Molecular Detection<br>PCR, qPCR, RAA-CRISPR]
    F1 --> G[Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing<br>Broth Microdilution, Disk Diffusion]
    F2 --> G
    F3 --> G
    G --> H1["Sensitive: Continue Current Protocol"]
    G --> H2["Resistant: Genotypic Characterization<br>WGS, MLST, Resistance Gene Detection"]
    H2 --> I[Epidemiological Analysis<br>Phylogenetic Clustering, Source Attribution]
    I --> J[Intervention Adjustment<br>Biosecurity, Vaccination, Phage Therapy]

Conclusion

The bacterial pathogens colonizing chickens represent a diverse and evolving threat to both poultry health and food safety. Salmonella enterica, Campylobacter jejuni, avian pathogenic Escherichia coli, and Clostridium perfringens remain the most economically significant organisms, while emerging pathogens such as carbapenem-resistant gram-negative bacteria and linezolid-resistant enterococci pose new challenges. The global trend toward reducing antibiotic use in poultry production has accelerated the development of alternative mitigation strategies, including bacteriophage therapy, probiotics, phytogenic compounds, and vaccination. Integration of these approaches within comprehensive biosecurity programs offers the most sustainable path forward for reducing the bacterial burden on chicken and improving the safety of poultry products.

References

[1] El-Shall NA, Adiguzel MC, Abd El-Ghany WA, et al. Salmonella infection in chickens: pathogen, pathogenesis, and dietary non-drug feed additives as alternatives to antibiotics - a comprehensive review. Folia Microbiol (Praha). 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41762430/

[2] Zhang Y, Chu M, Samala S, et al. Mobile genetic elements drive the evolution and multidrug resistance of Salmonella infantis along the United States poultry production line. BMC Genomics. 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41776394/

[3] Akrami F, Jamali H, Houle S, et al. Host range and zoonotic potential linked to P-like fimbrial (PLF) adhesin specificity in avian pathogenic Escherichia coli. PLoS Pathog. 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41941531/

[4] Li Y, Xue Y, Quan Y, et al. Direct interaction between avian pathogenic Escherichia coli and H9N2 avian influenza virus promotes bacterial adhesion during their infections. Microbiol Spectr. 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42294695/

[5] Li Y, Quan Y, Quan K, et al. Construction and immunogenicity evaluation of avian Escherichia coli-derived bacterial biomimetic vesicles displaying H9 subtype avian influenza virus HA1 protein. Vet Microbiol. 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42061219/

[6] Ribeiro J, Silva V, Pinto P, et al. Genomic and phenotypic characterization of Enterococcus faecalis from broiler sternal bursitis: antimicrobial resistance and one health risks. Vet Res Commun. 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41762393/

[7] Xin J, Zhang J, Liang S, et al. A multiplex TaqMan real-time PCR assay for differential identification of wild-type and vaccine strains of Mycoplasma gallisepticum. Poult Sci. 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41702344/

[8] Kamali SK, Tajbakhsh E, Khamsipour F, et al. Molecular Insights and Antibiotic Resistance of Proteus mirabilis from Retail Meat Sources in Iran. Food Sci Nutr. 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42145818/

[9] Mousa WS, Abdeen EE, El-Gendy HF, et al. Prevalence and genotyping of Pseudomonas aeruginosa from food and human sources. Sci Rep. 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41702978/

[10] Li Y, Tang H, Chen Y, et al. Emergence of Linezolid Resistance Genes optrA and poxtA in an Avian Enterococcus asini. Int J Mol Sci. 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42123305/

[11] Ghanem M, Harris A, Timilsina M, et al. A standardized, genome-guided MLST scheme for Avibacterium paragallinarum: enhanced epidemiological typing and validation against existing methods. J Clin Microbiol. 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41665375/

[12] Wu L, Li P, Bai M, et al. Whole-genome analysis of a polyvalent Salmonella phage reveals its potential to combat intracellular infection and food contamination. Food Res Int. 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41942208/

[13] Shaufi MAM, Chia SL, Hassim HA, et al. Effect of bacteriophages on growth performance and health indicators in broiler chickens in the absence of bacterial challenge - A review. Vet Med (Praha). 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41869088/

[14] Xu T, Yang W, Cao J, et al. Isolation and therapeutic potential of phage vB_EcoM_GXW16 against a drug-resistant avian pathogenic Escherichia coli strain. Poult Sci. 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41833115/

[15] Fornal E, Pękala A, Łaszkiewicz M, et al. The phage for PPLA age: effective method for Salmonella-free poultry feed. Microbiol Spectr. 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41677261/

[16] Biswas P, Ahmed S, Mondal S, et al. Recombinant LAB vector-based multicomponent vaccine against Campylobacter jejuni potentially promoting a healthier microbial balance in the poultry gut. Microbiome. 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42098871/

[17] Ager EO, Nickodem CA, Brown J, et al. Diet-vaccine interactions: SQM Iron and Salmonella vaccination shape poultry gut microbiota. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41979594/

[18] Al-Doury MKW, Jiang T, Jun SR, et al. Functional dissection of the genome of Salmonella Typhimurium to understand its tolerance to the bactericidal activity of peracetic acid. J Appl Microbiol. 2026. URL:

[19] Abbas NH, Mohammed BJ. Antibacterial efficacy of nanocobalt particles against multidrug-resistant Enterococcus spp. and Pasteurella spp. isolated from broiler chickens. Open Vet J. 2025. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41630721/

[20] Zhang K, Chen Q, Chen J, et al. Contactless gas-sensitive photoelectrochemical biosensor for determination of Salmonella typhimurium based on SnO(2)/CeO(2) heterojunction. Anal Chim Acta. 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42067303/

[21] Zaman S, Ali N, Ullah W, et al. Metagenomic Profiling Reveals Extensive Bacterial Diversity in Chicken Manure and Associated Contaminated Wastewater. Int J Mol Sci. 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42123326/

[22] Kanwal B, Asif E, Kalhoro NH, et al. Prevalence of Antimicrobial-Resistant Bacterial Pathogens Among Livestock in Subtropical Environments. Antibiotics (Basel). 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42192683/

[23] Meng X, Li N, Xu J, et al. The molecular, antigenic, and pathogenic characterization of novel IBV of GI-22 lineage endemic in China. Virology. 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41666590/

[24] Heintzman AA, Keenum I, Capone D. Diverse enteric bacterial, viral, and parasitic pathogen genes are shed in animal feces in Indiana. PLoS One. 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41650124/

Disclaimer: This article is for educational and informational purposes only. It is not intended to substitute for professional veterinary advice, diagnosis, treatment, or regulatory guidance. Always consult a licensed veterinarian or qualified specialist regarding animal health, disease diagnosis, and therapeutic decisions.