Section: Avian Bacteria

Avian Bacterial Infections: Salmonella, E. coli, and Campylobacter in Poultry

Introduction

Bacterial infections of poultry represent a major constraint to commercial production worldwide, causing mortality, reduced performance, and carcass condemnation [1, 2]. The most significant bacterial pathogens in chickens, turkeys, ducks, and other avian species include Salmonella enterica, avian pathogenic Escherichia coli (APEC), and thermophilic Campylobacter species. These agents are associated with a spectrum of clinical diseases, from subclinical colonization to severe systemic infections [3, 24]. Additionally, they are the most common bacterial contaminants of poultry meat and eggs, raising food safety concerns that have led to regulatory frameworks such as the FSIS poultry Salmonella initiatives [2, 24, 32]. This article provides an exhaustive review of the etiology, epidemiology, clinical signs, pathology, diagnostics, treatment, and control of these three key pathogens, with an emphasis on veterinary and diagnostic perspectives.

Salmonella in Poultry

Etiology and Host Range

Salmonella enterica encompasses over 2,500 serovars, many of which are capable of colonizing the avian gastrointestinal tract. Host-adapted serovars such as Salmonella Gallinarum and Salmonella Pullorum cause typhoidal disease in chickens, while broad-host serovars like Salmonella Enteritidis and Salmonella Typhimurium primarily cause asymptomatic carriage but pose foodborne risks [3, 29]. Pathoadaptation to the avian host has been documented in passerine-associated Salmonella Typhimurium lineages, which exhibit pseudogene accumulation in type III secretion system effectors and loss of the virulence plasmid, yet retain high virulence in birds [29]. Salmonella Kentucky is another serovar frequently isolated from poultry in surveillance studies, often exhibiting multidrug resistance [2, 21, 32].

Epidemiology and Transmission

Transmission occurs via the fecal-oral route, through contaminated feed, water, litter, or vertical transmission via eggs [3]. In commercial flocks, Salmonella prevalence varies by region and production system. A five-year surveillance in Jiangxi Province, China, found Salmonella spp. in 14.1% of bacterial isolates from clinically diseased poultry [2]. The question "does all chicken have Salmonella" is often asked by consumers; in reality, prevalence in raw chicken meat varies widely but can be reduced by proper biosecurity and vaccination [24, 32]. In the UK, control programs have significantly decreased Salmonella in broiler flocks [24]. For "salmonella chicken baby", the risk to infants is primarily through contaminated poultry products, highlighting the importance of thorough cooking.

Clinical Signs and Pathology

In chickens, clinical disease caused by host-adapted serovars includes pullorum disease (white diarrhea, high mortality in chicks) and fowl typhoid (septicemia, enlarged liver and spleen) [3]. Broad-host serovars rarely cause clinical signs in adult poultry but may lead to enteritis in young birds. Lesions include caseous cecal cores, hepatomegaly, and splenomegaly [3]. Salmonella can also be isolated from joints and pericardium in chronic cases.

Diagnostics

Isolation involves selective enrichment (e.g., Rappaport-Vassiliadis broth) followed by plating on selective agar (XLD, brilliant green). Confirmation uses biochemical tests and serotyping [3]. Molecular detection via PCR targeting invA or hilA is widely used for rapid screening [1, 4]. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing should be performed due to high resistance rates [2, 21].

Avian Pathogenic Escherichia coli (APEC)

Etiology and Pathotypes

APEC is the primary cause of avian colibacillosis, a complex of extraintestinal infections including airsacculitis, pericarditis, perihepatitis, and septicemia [1, 5, 6, 27]. APEC strains belong to extraintestinal pathogenic E. coli (ExPEC) and share virulence genes with human uropathogenic and neonatal meningitis E. coli [7, 25]. Key virulence factors include adhesins (fimbriae, curli, nonfimbrial adhesins), iron acquisition systems (e.g., irp2-fyuA in high pathogenicity islands), and toxins [8, 27]. The TolA protein, part of the Tol-Pal system, contributes to outer membrane integrity, biofilm formation, and serum resistance [6]. The two-component system CpxRA regulates efflux pumps and biofilm formation, affecting antibiotic susceptibility [22]. The YafN-YafO toxin-antitoxin system enhances stress resistance and survival within macrophages [5].

Epidemiology and Transmission

APEC is ubiquitous in poultry environments. Transmission is by inhalation or ingestion of contaminated feces, dust, or aerosolized particles [1, 4]. Coinfections with respiratory viruses (e.g., H9N2 avian influenza, infectious bronchitis virus) or Mycoplasma gallisepticum predispose birds to colibacillosis by damaging respiratory epithelium and upregulating bacterial adhesion factors such as TGF-β1 [4, 23, 25]. Heat stress and coccidiosis also exacerbate APEC pathogenesis [9]. Surveillance in China reported APEC as the most prevalent bacterial pathogen, with isolation rates reaching 57.5% of diseased poultry samples [21]. Multidrug resistance in APEC exceeds 99% in some regions, with high resistance to amoxicillin, enrofloxacin, tetracyclines, and florfenicol [2, 21, 34].

Clinical Signs and Pathology

Acute septicemia causes sudden death in young birds. Subacute disease presents with depression, ruffled feathers, respiratory distress, and reduced feed intake [3]. Postmortem lesions include fibrinous airsacculitis, pericarditis (often described as "bread and butter" pericardium), perihepatitis, and peritonitis. In older birds, salpingitis and yolk sac infection are common [5, 6, 34]. "Chicken breast bacteria" and "chicken neck bacteria" can refer to pathogens colonizing these tissues during processing; APEC is frequently isolated from raw poultry meat [10].

Diagnostics

Isolation from affected organs (liver, spleen, lung, air sacs) on MacConkey or blood agar, followed by Gram staining, oxidase negative, and IMViC tests [3]. Molecular identification uses PCR for species-specific (uidA) and virulence genes (iutA, iroN, iss, tsh) to differentiate APEC from commensal fecal E. coli [27, 34]. Phylogenetic grouping (e.g., A, B1, C, B2) is used for epidemiological typing [34]. Antimicrobial susceptibility is critical due to high resistance rates [2, 21].

Campylobacter in Poultry

Etiology and Host Association

Thermophilic Campylobacter species, primarily C. jejuni and C. coli, are commensals in the avian intestinal tract, particularly in chickens and turkeys. Poultry are considered the primary reservoir for human campylobacteriosis [24]. Clinical disease in birds is rare, but experimental infections can cause mild enteritis in young chicks [24]. The question "what is ducks disease" may refer to Riemerella anatipestifer, not Campylobacter, but ducks also carry Campylobacter [2]. Campylobacter is the "pathogen most common in raw poultry meat" alongside Salmonella and E. coli, often found in high numbers on chicken breast and neck tissues [2, 24].

Transmission and Risk Factors

Horizontal transmission through contaminated water, feed, and litter is the main route. Flock colonization increases with age, and biosecurity breaches introduce Campylobacter into broiler houses [24]. Once established, the bacterium spreads rapidly through the flock. Processing plant operations (defeathering, evisceration, chilling) lead to carcass contamination. "E coli on raw chicken" and "can you get e coli from chicken" are frequent consumer queries; similarly, Campylobacter and Salmonella are the primary foodborne concerns. Proper cooking kills these bacteria, but "reheat chicken kill bacteria" requires that internal temperature reaches at least 74°C for all pathogens [24]. "Does cooked chicken grow bacteria" depends on storage: cooked poultry can support growth of Clostridium perfringens and Bacillus cereus, but not Campylobacter or Salmonella if reheated to lethal temperatures.

Clinical Signs and Pathology

Clinical campylobacteriosis in poultry is usually subclinical. In young chicks or stressed birds, mucoid diarrhea and reduced weight gain may occur. Lesions include fluid-filled cecae and mild enteritis. However, the primary importance of Campylobacter in poultry is its role as a zoonotic foodborne pathogen [24].

Diagnostics

Isolation requires microaerophilic conditions (5% O2, 10% CO2, 85% N2) on selective media (e.g., Campy-Cefex). Incubation at 42°C for 48 hours. Identification by Gram stain (curved rods), oxidase positive, catalase positive, and hippurate hydrolysis (for C. jejuni). PCR targeting mapA or 16S rRNA provides rapid confirmation [3, 24].

Pathogenesis and Virulence Mechanisms

The pathogenesis of these three bacterial groups involves adhesion, colonization, immune evasion, and toxin production. APEC employs a suite of adhesins including type 1 and P fimbriae, curli, and autotransporter adhesins for attachment to respiratory and intestinal epithelium [27]. The Fur protein regulates flagellar motility by binding the flhD promoter, influencing invasion [31]. Toxin-antitoxin systems like YafN-YafO promote persister cell formation under antibiotic stress, contributing to recalcitrant infections [5]. Iron acquisition via siderophores (aerobactin, yersiniabactin) is critical for systemic spread [8, 27].

Salmonella uses type III secretion systems (T3SS-1 and T3SS-2) to inject effectors into host cells, triggering cytoskeletal rearrangements and preventing lysosomal fusion [29, 33]. The loss of T3SS-2 effectors in passerine-adapted strains suggests host-specific pathoadaptation [29]. Campylobacter produces cytolethal distending toxin (CDT) that causes DNA damage and cell cycle arrest in epithelial cells [24]. Its flagella are essential for motility and invasion.

Immune Responses and Coinfections

Avian innate immunity is the first line of defense. Toll-like receptors (TLRs) recognize bacterial components, triggering pro-inflammatory cytokines via NF-κB pathways [11, 19]. Mycoplasma gallisepticum infection upregulates IL-17 and NF-κB, which can be counteracted by luteolin, a natural flavonoid [18]. Heat stress modulates Th1/Th2 balance, increasing susceptibility to necrotic enteritis caused by Clostridium perfringens but also affecting APEC and Salmonella pathogenesis [9]. Coinfections with viruses like H9N2 AIV increase APEC adhesion via TGF-β1 upregulation [23]. Long noncoding RNAs (e.g., TCONS_00007391) modulate macrophage inflammatory responses in APEC infection [11].

Diagnostic Approaches

A structured diagnostic workflow is essential for accurate identification and antimicrobial stewardship. The following Mermaid diagram outlines a typical bacterial diagnostic tree for poultry.

flowchart TD
    A[Clinical sample: liver, spleen, lung, cecal tonsils, cloacal swab], > B{Initial culture}
    B, > C[MacConkey & blood agar 37°C 24h]
    B, > D[Selective Salmonella: XLD, brilliant green 37°C 24h]
    B, > E[Campylobacter selective: Campy-Cefex microaerophilic 42°C 48h]
    C, > F[E. coli-like colonies: lactose positive, Gram-negative rods]
    D, > G[Salmonella-like colonies: black center (H2S) on XLD]
    E, > H[Campylobacter-like: small, mucoid, curved rods]
    F, > I[Biochemical: IMViC, oxidase negative]
    G, > J[Biochemical: urea negative, TSI: acid/acid with H2S]
    H, > K[Gram stain, oxidase positive, hippurate hydrolysis]
    I, > L[PCR/Sanger sequencing: *uidA*, APEC virulence genes *iutA*, *iroN*, *iss*]
    J, > M[Serotyping (O, H antigens) or PCR *invA*, *hilA*]
    K, > N[PCR *mapA* for *C. jejuni* or multiplex for *C. coli*]
    L, > O[Antimicrobial susceptibility testing (disk diffusion or microdilution)]
    M, > O
    N, > O
    O, > P[Report identification, resistance profile, and virulence markers]

Table 1 compares key diagnostic features of the three pathogens.

Feature Salmonella spp. APEC Campylobacter spp.
Gram reaction Negative rods Negative rods Negative curved rods
Oxidase Negative Negative Positive
Optimal growth Aerobic, 37°C Aerobic, 37°C Microaerophilic, 42°C
Selective media XLD, brilliant green, Rappaport-Vassiliadis MacConkey Campy-Cefex, modified CCDA
Key virulence genes invA, hilA, sseL iutA, iroN, iss, tsh cdtB, flaA
Antimicrobial resistance patterns High to tetracyclines, sulfonamides Very high, MDR prevalent; emergence of tet(X4) tigecycline resistance Resistance to fluoroquinolones, macrolides emerging

Treatment and Antimicrobial Resistance

Antimicrobial therapy for colibacillosis traditionally relies on amoxicillin, enrofloxacin, florfenicol, and tetracyclines [2, 21]. However, resistance rates are alarming. In Jiangxi Province, APEC resistance to amoxicillin, enrofloxacin, and florfenicol exceeded 80% [2, 21]. Multidrug resistance (MDR) in APEC was 99.2%, and Salmonella isolates showed 100% MDR in 2023-2024 [2]. Carbapenemase genes (blaNDM) and colistin resistance (mcr-1) have been detected in avian E. coli [21]. The plasmid-mediated tet(X4) gene conferring tigecycline resistance is emerging in poultry in China [20]. These developments threaten both veterinary and human medicine.

Alternative strategies include bacteriophage therapy. Several studies have demonstrated the efficacy of lytic phage cocktails against APEC in vitro and in vivo [10, 12, 13]. A cocktail of eight phages from nine genera conferred 90% survival in chicken embryo lethality assays [12]. Oral delivery of Lactococcus lactis expressing lactoferrin peptides shows promise as a feed additive to reduce APEC colonization [14]. Small molecule growth inhibitors targeting bacterial outer membrane integrity (e.g., GI-7) have reduced APEC mortality in chickens [7]. Plant extracts like Piper betle inhibit APEC biofilm and adhesion [30]. Probiotics combined with live Salmonella vaccines enhance protection against both APEC and Salmonella [32]. Enrofloxacin penetration into avian aqueous humour supports its use for ocular infections [35].

Control and Biosecurity

Prevention focuses on biosecurity, vaccination, and immune modulation [24]. Salmonella vaccines (live attenuated or killed) are used in breeders and layers to reduce egg transmission [32]. For APEC, no broadly effective commercial vaccine exists due to serotype diversity; autogenous bacterins are sometimes used [24, 32]. Disinfectants based on potassium monopersulfate are effective against Salmonella, E. coli, and Listeria biofilms on drinking fountains [15]. Modulation of innate immunity with immunostimulatory compounds is an emerging strategy [24].

"Chicken bacteria toxins" such as lipopolysaccharide (endotoxin) from Gram-negative bacteria contribute to systemic inflammation and septic shock. Proper cooking is the "only reliable method to kill bacteria on chicken meat". The FSIS poultry Salmonella framework sets performance standards for carcass contamination. "Poultry quizlet" is an online study tool that often covers these pathogens.

Food Safety Considerations

The most common bacterial pathogens in raw poultry meat are Campylobacter jejuni, Salmonella spp., and E. coli [2, 24, 32]. "Salmonella chicken washing" is discouraged by public health agencies because splashing water can spread bacteria. Similarly, "salmonella chicken baby" requires emphasis on thorough cooking (74°C internal temperature). "Can you get E. coli from chicken" yes, especially from APEC which shares virulence genes with human ExPEC [7, 25]. "Does cooked chicken grow bacteria" yes, if stored improperly; vegetative cells can multiply if temperature-abused. "Reheat chicken kill bacteria" yes, if reheated to at least 74°C.

"Chicken ka bacteria" is a Hindi phrase referring to bacterial pathogens in chicken. "What is ducks disease" typically refers to Riemerella anatipestifer which causes duck septicemia, but ducks also carry Salmonella and E. coli [2].

Conclusion

Salmonella, APEC, and Campylobacter remain the three most important bacterial pathogens of poultry, causing substantial economic losses and posing zoonotic risks. Their complex virulence mechanisms, immune evasion strategies, and rapidly increasing antimicrobial resistance demand integrated diagnostic, therapeutic, and preventive approaches. Molecular diagnostics, phage therapy, immunomodulation, and improved biosecurity offer pathways to reduce the burden of these infections in the post-antibiotic era.

References

[1] N. Yehia, H. Salem, Yassser Mahmmod et al., "Common viral and bacterial avian respiratory infections: an updated review," Poultry Science, 2023. (https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b59668b0ff59fad8068705e4b41490667cc62622)

[2] M.-F. Tan, J. Tan, J. Huang et al., "Bacterial pathogens in Jiangxi poultry (2023–2024): Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance profiles," Poultry Science, 2025. (https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/48267f13d1ba6d2295aa38ab39ae3f6ff685b787)

[3] A. M. Fudge, "Diagnosis and treatment of avian bacterial disease," Journal, 2001. (https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/faee008af87b3e1964801cfdf73ce509adcc1b25)

[4] J. Yadav, Y. Singh, Kanisht Batra et al., "Molecular detection of respiratory avian mycoplasmosis associated bacterial and viral concurrent infections in the poultry flocks," Animal Biotechnology, 2022. (https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/033cf4d4b0937041b911e33c90e25e17ba866947)

[5] Q. Chen, Y. Sun, Q. Xing et al., "YafN-YafO toxin-antitoxin system contributes to stress resistance and virulence of avian pathogenic Escherichia coli," Poultry Science, 2025. (https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8e1916e11ad9f9c6550fe22dc8e93b1e3c17cf69)

[6] S. Su, Z. Li, Y. Sun et al., "The multifaceted role of TolA protein in promoting survival, biofilm formation and virulence of avian pathogenic Escherichia coli," Poultry Science, 2024. (https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2afe3cc4d362ba15c298693529615fe8b2bb6661)

[7] D. Kathayat, Y. A. Helmy, L. Deblais et al., "Novel Small Molecule Growth Inhibitor Affecting Bacterial Outer Membrane Reduces Extraintestinal Pathogenic Escherichia coli (ExPEC) Infection in Avian Model," Microbiology spectrum, 2021. (https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/cceb46548669609e88d94ff1d6d49d6d22e18a81)

[8] J. Tu, T. Xue, K. Qi et al., "The irp2 and fyuA genes in High Pathogenicity Islands are involved in the pathogenesis of infections caused by avian pathogenic Escherichia coli (APEC)," Polish journal of veterinary sciences, 2016. (https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/41f21f83f2c776b2833ab028cd0e0f17064828bc)

[9] A. S. Calefi, W. Quinteiro-Filho, A. de Siqueira et al., "Heat stress, Eimeria spp. and C. perfringens infections alone or in combination modify gut Th1/Th2 cytokine balance and avian necrotic enteritis pathogenesis," Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology, 2019. (https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c2890e604451625c85a28c765c8df4acefbf093b)

[10] D. Sáez Moreno, M. Kuczkowski, P. Korzeniowski et al., "Application of UPWr_E124 phage cocktail for effective reduction of avian pathogenic Escherichia coli in mice and broiler chickens," Veterinary Microbiology, 2025. (https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d44f962e1b3f87a353987938b1a5385339bf77b5)

[11] H. Sun, X. Cao, Sumayya et al., "Genome-wide transcriptional profiling and functional analysis of long noncoding RNAs and mRNAs in chicken macrophages associated with the infection of avian pathogenic E. coli," BMC Veterinary Research, 2024. (https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8bee3e52a2e35604d300ec2d5547a85a226f5b3c)

[12] M. Nicolas, A. Trotereau, A. Culot et al., "Isolation and Characterization of a Novel Phage Collection against Avian-Pathogenic Escherichia coli," Microbiology spectrum, 2023. (https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/52bd380ded277cf1d1846a316ca474ca835a755c)

[13] S. Sattar, M. A. Bailie, A. Yaqoob et al., "Characterization of two novel lytic bacteriophages having lysis potential against MDR avian pathogenic Escherichia coli strains of zoonotic potential," *Scientific Reports

[14] Z. Li, X. Wang, D. Zheng et al., "Oral-Delivery Lactococcus lactis expressing cherry fusion lactoferrin peptides against infection of avian pathogenic Escherichia coli in chickens," Poultry Science, 2024. (https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/76c02787c16d849a74741f8c6d3d37d011034953)

[15] M. A. Moraes, M. Oliveira-Silva, R. S. Goulart et al., "Antimicrobial activity of products based on potassium monopersulfate on bacteria associated with avian infections," Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, 2023. (https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d0cb4feceacca0601d19df0e3687e378ddf8a326)

[16] J. Betts, S. Cawthraw, J. Smyth et al., "The manganese carbonyl complex [Mn(CO)3(tqa-κ3N)]Br: A novel antimicrobial agent with the potential to treat avian pathogenic Escherichia coli (APEC) infections," Veterinary Microbiology, 2023. (https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1194dfd6a9760a1e9e74bf48a9e8eb1ff3d8f5c1)

[17] M. S. Cover, "A review of the chemotherapy of avian viral and bacterial infections," Journal, 1957. (https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/20d06a7293647ea5c369241e3de708d92f354faf)