Aeromonas hydrophila in Aquaculture: Virulence Factors and Antimicrobial Resistance

Introduction

Aeromonas hydrophila is a Gram-negative, facultatively anaerobic, rod-shaped bacterium that is ubiquitous in freshwater and brackish aquatic environments [1, 2, 3]. This species belongs to the family Aeromonadaceae and is one of the most frequently isolated motile aeromonads from cultured fish species globally [4, 48, 57]. In aquaculture, A. hydrophila is the primary etiological agent of motile Aeromonas septicemia (MAS), a hemorrhagic septicemia that causes substantial economic losses in both warmwater and coldwater fish farming operations [5, 6, 40]. The disease spectrum includes hemorrhagic septicemia, red spot disease, fin rot, ulcerative lesions, and systemic infections that can lead to mass mortality events in species such as Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus), grass carp (Ctenopharyngodon idella), channel catfish (Ictalurus punctatus), and American eels (Anguilla rostrata) [7, 5, 52, 56]. The pathogen also affects crustaceans such as Macrobrachium nipponense and ornamental shrimps [40, 60].

The pathogenicity of A. hydrophila is multifactorial, relying on a complex arsenal of virulence determinants that mediate adhesion, invasion, iron acquisition, toxin production, biofilm formation, and quorum sensing (QS) [8, 2, 9, 45]. Compounding the challenge of disease control, the bacterium has demonstrated a remarkable capacity for acquiring antimicrobial resistance (AMR) determinants, leading to the emergence of multidrug-resistant (MDR) strains in aquaculture systems [10, 4, 11, 12, 53]. This article provides a detailed biophysical and molecular review of the virulence factors and AMR mechanisms of A. hydrophila in the context of aquaculture, drawing on genomic, transcriptomic, and phenotypic evidence from recent peer-reviewed studies.

Virulence Factors of Aeromonas hydrophila

Adhesion and Colonization Factors

The initial step in infection involves adherence to host epithelial surfaces, mediated primarily by pili and outer membrane proteins [13, 14, 59]. Type IV pili (T4P) are critical for adhesion, twitching motility, and biofilm formation. The secretin TapQ, a component of the T4P assembly machinery, has been shown to contribute to motility, growth under stress conditions, and virulence in A. hydrophila [13]. Mutants lacking tapQ exhibit reduced adhesion to host cells and impaired biofilm structure [13]. The flagellar hook protein FlgK also plays a dual role in motility and pathogenicity; deletion of flgK attenuates swimming and swarming motility and downregulates the expression of other virulence genes, including those encoding exotoxins [14]. The outer membrane porin LamB, which is maltose-inducible, serves as an immunogenic adhesion factor that can generate cross-species agglutinating antibodies in murine models [15].

Secretion Systems and Exotoxins

A. hydrophila employs several secretion systems to deliver effectors into host cells. The type III secretion system (T3SS) and type VI secretion system (T6SS) are well-documented in hypervirulent strains [16, 17, 18, 46]. The T3SS injects effector proteins that disrupt host cytoskeletal dynamics and immune signaling [8, 46]. The exeA gene, involved in the type II secretion system (T2SS), is essential for the extracellular secretion of toxins. Xiong et al. demonstrated that exeA deletion reduces hemolytic and proteolytic activities and attenuates virulence in a fish model [19].

Aerolysin is the most extensively studied pore-forming toxin of A. hydrophila [20, 8, 39, 42]. This beta-barrel toxin binds to host cell membranes, oligomerizes, and forms heptameric channels that cause osmotic lysis [39, 42]. Aerolysin expression is regulated by QS and is a key target for antivirulence strategies [21, 20, 22, 41]. Other exotoxins include hemolysins (HlyA), cytolytic enterotoxins (Act), and various proteases that degrade host tissues and evade immune responses [6, 42, 45].

Iron Acquisition Systems

Iron is an essential micronutrient for bacterial growth, and A. hydrophila possesses multiple TonB-dependent iron transport systems to scavenge iron from the host environment [46]. Three TonB systems have been characterized in the Chinese epidemic strain NJ-35; these systems are critical for siderophore-mediated iron uptake and virulence in a zebrafish model [46]. The presence of multiple iron acquisition genes in the genome correlates with high pathogenicity in hypervirulent isolates [16, 18].

Biofilm Formation and Quorum Sensing

Biofilm formation is a crucial survival strategy that protects A. hydrophila from antimicrobial agents and host immune defenses [23, 24, 42, 43]. The biofilm matrix is composed of exopolysaccharides, proteins, and extracellular DNA [23, 43]. Biofilm development is regulated by QS, which relies on the production and detection of N-acyl homoserine lactones (AHLs) through the AhyI/AhyR system [43, 58]. The AHL synthase AhyI produces C4-HSL and C6-HSL, which bind to the transcriptional regulator AhyR to control the expression of virulence genes, including those for aerolysin and proteases [43, 58]. Several natural compounds, including apigenin, xanthoxylin, carvacrol, quercetin, naringin, curcumin, fisetin, palmatine, methyl gallate, and saponins from sea cucumber, have been shown to inhibit QS and thereby reduce virulence factor production and biofilm formation in A. hydrophila [21, 25, 26, 27, 23, 24, 28, 20, 29, 22, 41, 43]. The quorum quenching enzyme YtnP from Bacillus licheniformis T-1 hydrolyzes AHLs and attenuates virulence in carp and zebrafish models [30, 47]. Similarly, recombinant lactonase AiiA(QSI-1) degrades AHLs and reduces mortality in crucian carp [44]. Probiotic Bacillus species, including Bacillus subtilis and Bacillus strain QSI-1, modulate QS signals and reduce A. hydrophila levels in fish gut microbiomes [49, 51, 54].

Comparative Genomics of Virulence

Comparative genomic analyses have revealed that hypervirulent lineages, particularly those belonging to sequence type 251 (ST251), carry distinct genetic determinants associated with enhanced pathogenicity [16, 18]. The hypervirulent A. hydrophila (vAh) strains are characterized by the presence of specific T3SS and T6SS gene clusters, as well as multiple copies of hemolysin and aerolysin genes [16, 8, 18]. Abdella et al. performed whole-genome comparisons and identified novel single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in virulence genes that distinguish highly pathogenic isolates from environmental strains [8]. Environmental factors, including salinity [31] and cultivation conditions [32], have been shown to influence virulence gene expression through transcriptomic reprogramming. Zhao et al. reported that in vitro passage alters the transcriptome of A. hydrophila, leading to changes in the expression of T3SS components and extracellular proteases, which has implications for the preparation of autogenous vaccines [32]. Geographic origin and host species also shape the genomic content of motile aeromonads, as demonstrated by Payne et al. in Southeast Asian aquatic environments [1].

Antimicrobial Resistance in Aquaculture

Global Prevalence and Resistance Patterns

The extensive use of antibiotics in aquaculture has driven the evolution and dissemination of AMR in A. hydrophila [10, 4, 53]. A systematic review and meta-analysis by Jeamsripong et al. reported that A. hydrophila from aquatic food animals exhibits high resistance rates to tetracyclines, sulfonamides, and beta-lactams, with some studies documenting resistance to colistin, a last-resort antibiotic [10, 12]. Resistance to fluoroquinolones and aminoglycosides is also common [4, 11, 12]. Multidrug resistance (MDR), defined as resistance to three or more antibiotic classes, is frequently observed in isolates from aquaculture farms [4, 11, 12, 60]. In village freshwater ponds in North India, Nokhwal et al. found that over 70% of Aeromonas isolates were MDR, with high resistance to ampicillin, erythromycin, and tetracycline [4]. Resistance profiles often vary spatially and temporally, influenced by farm management practices and water quality parameters [10, 3].

Molecular Mechanisms of Resistance

Resistance in A. hydrophila is mediated by a combination of intrinsic and acquired mechanisms [17, 8, 53]. Beta-lactam resistance is primarily due to the production of beta-lactamases, including class B metallo-beta-lactamases and class C cephalosporinases [17, 8]. Tetracycline resistance is often conferred by tet genes (e.g., tetA, tetE) encoding efflux pumps [53]. Sulfonamide resistance is mediated by alternative dihydropteroate synthase genes (sul1, sul2) [53]. Colistin resistance in A. hydrophila has been linked to mobile colistin resistance (mcr) genes, including mcr-3 and mcr-7 variants, which modify the lipid A moiety of lipopolysaccharide [12]. Integrons and plasmids facilitate the horizontal transfer of resistance gene cassettes, enabling rapid dissemination within microbial communities [17, 8]. Genomic analysis of isolates from striped catfish in Vietnam revealed that A. hydrophila strains carrying resistance genes for beta-lactams, aminoglycosides, and phenicols were shared between aquaculture and human clinical settings, indicating a potential zoonotic spillover [17].

Anti-Virulence and Alternative Control Strategies

Given the increasing failure of conventional antibiotics, alternative strategies to control A. hydrophila infections have been extensively investigated [33, 7, 34, 26, 11, 28, 29, 35, 22, 41]. These approaches can be broadly categorized into (1) QS inhibition (quorum quenching), (2) phage therapy, (3) application of natural compounds with antivirulence activity, (4) probiotics, and (5) vaccination.

Quorum quenching enzymes, such as lactonases from Bacillus species, degrade AHL signals and reduce virulence without imposing selective pressure for resistance [30, 44, 47, 51, 54]. Phage therapy using lytic bacteriophages, including jumbo phages (e.g., phage Z90) and phage BUCT551, has shown efficacy in reducing A. hydrophila loads in eels and in vitro [7, 34, 36]. Silver nanoparticles combined with hydrogen peroxide have been evaluated for biocontrol of MDR pathogens in fish farms [11]. Natural compounds such as organic acids (e.g., citric acid, lactic acid) target key virulence factors including aerolysin and biofilm formation [33]. Probiotic bacteria, such as Streptomyces sp. SH5, enhance host immunity and inhibit Aeromonas infections in zebrafish larvae [35]. Vaccination with inactivated whole cells, extracellular products, or recombinant proteins (e.g., LamB, aerolysin toxoids) has provided varying degrees of protection [15, 32, 37, 56]. Live-attenuated vaccines generated by multi-gene deletion have shown promise in grass carp [37].

The following Mermaid diagram outlines a decision framework for the management of A. hydrophila infections in aquaculture.

flowchart TD
    A[Clinical Signs of MAS in Fish] --> B{Confirmatory Diagnosis}
    B --> C["Isolation & Identification<br>(Culture + 16S rRNA / gyrB PCR")]
    B --> D["Antimicrobial Susceptibility<br>Testing (AST")]
    D --> E{Isolate MDR?}
    E -->|Yes| F[Consider Alternative Strategies]
    E -->|No| G["Antibiotic Therapy<br>(Per AST profile")]
    F --> H[Phage Therapy]
    F --> I["Quorum Quenching<br>(Probiotic Bacillus spp.")]
    F --> J["Nature-Derived Anti-Virulence<br>Compounds (e.g., QS inhibitors")]
    F --> K[Autogenous or Recombinant<br>Vaccination]
    H & I & J & K --> L[Monitor Mortality &<br>Environmental Parameters]
    G --> L
    L --> M{Recurrence?}
    M -->|Yes| F
    M -->|No| N[Continue Biosecurity &<br>Preventive Measures]

Diagnostic Considerations

Definitive diagnosis of A. hydrophila infection in fish relies on isolation of the bacterium from internal organs (kidney, spleen) or external lesions on selective media (e.g., Rimler-Shotts agar, ampicillin-dextrin agar) followed by biochemical characterization and molecular confirmation through 16S rRNA or species-specific gene (e.g., gyrB, aerA) PCR [4, 9, 6, 48]. Genotyping methods, including multilocus sequence typing (MLST) and whole-genome sequencing, are increasingly used for epidemiological surveillance and identification of hypervirulent clones [16, 17, 18]. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) should be performed using standardized disk diffusion or broth microdilution methods to guide therapeutic decisions and monitor resistance trends [10, 4, 11, 12, 60]. Cross-linking to existing relevant articles on this portal includes reference to Streptococcosis in Farmed Tilapia, where diagnostic approaches for co-infections with Streptococcus iniae are relevant [5]. Additionally, principles of Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing in Secondary Viral Co-infections may be applicable in mixed infections. The European Bioinformatics Institute and National Center for Biotechnology Information provide genomic resources for comparative analysis of A. hydrophila strains.

Conclusion

Aeromonas hydrophila remains a leading bacterial pathogen in global aquaculture due to its extensive repertoire of virulence factors and its propensity to acquire antimicrobial resistance. Quorum sensing, biofilm formation, and secretion systems are central to its pathogenicity, and these pathways represent promising targets for antivirulence therapies. The emergence of MDR and colistin-resistant strains necessitates a shift towards integrated disease management strategies that combine diagnostics, biosecurity, probiotics, phage therapy, and vaccination. Continued genomic surveillance and a deeper understanding of the molecular interplay between virulence and resistance will be essential to mitigate the impact of A. hydrophila on farmed fish and crustaceans.

References

[1] Payne CJ, Phuong VH, Kurniawan H et al. Are the genomes of motile Aeromonas species from the aquatic environment shaped by local geography and host species? Microb Genom. 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42029116/

[2] Semwal A, Kumar A, Kumar N. A review on pathogenicity of Aeromonas hydrophila and their mitigation through medicinal herbs in aquaculture. Heliyon. 2023. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36938468/

[3] Kumar CB, Kumar A, Paria A et al. Effect of spatio-temporal variables, host fish species and on-farm biosecurity measures on the prevalence of potentially pathogenic Aeromonas species in freshwater fish farms. J Appl Microbiol. 2022. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34664343/

[4] Nokhwal A, Vaid RK, Anand T et al. Aeromonas Species Diversity, Virulence Characteristics, and Antimicrobial Susceptibility Patterns in Village Freshwater Aquaculture Ponds in North India. Antibiotics (Basel). 2025. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40149104/

[5] Puneeth TG, Pallavi B, Vilasini U et al. Large scale mortality in cultured Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus): natural co-infection with Aeromonas hydrophila and Streptococcus iniae. Iran J Vet Res. 2022. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36425608/

[6] Ahangarzadeh M, Ghorbanpour Najafabadi M, Peyghan R et al. Detection and distribution of virulence genes in Aeromonas hydrophila isolates causing infection in cultured carps. Vet Res Forum. 2022. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35601789/

[7] Zhang M, Feng X, Wang J et al. Isolation, Characterization, and Evaluation of a Lytic Jumbo Phage Z90 Against Aeromonas hydrophila in American Eels (Anguilla rostrata). Antibiotics (Basel). 2025. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41594064/

[8] Abdella B, Abozahra NA, Shokrak NM et al. Whole spectrum of Aeromonas hydrophila virulence determinants and the identification of novel SNPs using comparative pathogenomics. Sci Rep. 2023. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37173388/

[9] Majeed S, De Silva LADS, Kumarage PM et al. Occurrence of potential virulence determinants in Aeromonas spp. isolated from different aquatic environments. J Appl Microbiol. 2023. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36809788/

[10] Jeamsripong S, Odoi JO, Shahi MK et al. Global spread and antimicrobial resistance of Aeromonas hydrophila in aquatic food animals: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Rep. 2025. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40759729/

[11] Saad MF, Elsayed MM, Khder M et al. Biocontrol of multidrug resistant pathogens isolated from fish farms using silver nanoparticles combined with hydrogen peroxide insight to its modulatory effect. Sci Rep. 2024. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38575637/

[12] Thaotumpitak V, Sripradite J, Atwill ER et al. Emergence of colistin resistance and characterization of antimicrobial resistance and virulence factors of Aeromonas hydrophila, Salmonella spp., and Vibrio cholerae isolated from hybrid red tilapia cage culture. PeerJ. 2023. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36855429/

[13] Liao Z, Long R, Ding W et al. Contribution of the type IV pili secretin tapQ to motility, growth, adhesion, stress tolerance and virulence of Aeromonas hydrophila. Int J Biol Macromol. 2025. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40107542/

[14] Lu J, Xiong C, Wei J et al. The role and molecular mechanism of flgK gene in biological properties, pathogenicity and virulence genes expression of Aeromonas hydrophila. Int J Biol Macromol. 2024. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38161026/

[15] Upadhyaya T, Yadav SK, Sharma V et al. Recombinant maltose-inducible porin LamB of Aeromonas hydrophila induces T(H)2-biased mixed immune response and generates cross-species agglutinating antibodies in the murine model. Mol Biol Rep. 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42183925/

[16] Xu L, Kang X, Wang Z et al. Genomic Insights into the Pathogenicity of Hypervirulent Aeromonas hydrophila Strain D4 Isolated from Diseased Blunt Snout Bream with the Epidemic Sequence Type 251 Clones. Pathogens. 2025. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40559578/

[17] Truong NHM, Nguyen Q, Voong PV et al. Genomic characterization of Aeromonas spp. isolates from striped catfish with motile Aeromonas septicemia and human bloodstream infections in Vietnam. Microb Genom. 2024. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38739115/

[18] Xu T, Rasmussen-Ivey CR, Moen FS et al. A Global Survey of Hypervirulent Aeromonas hydrophila (vAh) Identified vAh Strains in the Lower Mekong River Basin and Diverse Opportunistic Pathogens from Farmed Fish and Other Environmental Sources. Microbiol Spectr. 2023. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36815836/

[19] Xiong C, Jiao H, Ran J et al. A comprehensive understanding of the influence and molecular mechanism of exeA on the pathogenicity in Aeromonas hydrophila. Int J Biol Macromol. 2025. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39603288/

[20] Dong J, Yan T, Yang Q et al. Palmatine Inhibits the Pathogenicity of Aeromonas hydrophila by Reducing Aerolysin Expression. Foods. 2022. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37430999/

[21] Li S, Ma X, Zhou S et al. Apigenin decreases the pathogenicity of Aeromonas hydrophila infection by inhibiting aerolysin activity and interfering with quorum sensing. J Appl Microbiol. 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42233888/

[22] Zhang L, Ma L, Yang Q et al. Sanguinarine Protects Channel Catfish against Aeromonas hydrophila Infection by Inhibiting Aerolysin and Biofilm Formation. Pathogens. 2022. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35335647/

[23] Jayaraman S, Rajendhran N, Kannan MA et al. Quercetin disrupts biofilm formation and attenuates virulence of Aeromonas hydrophila. Arch Microbiol. 2024. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38922407/

[24] Jiang H, Wang Z, Jia AQ. Methyl gallate from Camellia nitidissima Chi flowers reduces quorum sensing related virulence and biofilm formation against Aeromonas hydrophila. Biofouling. 2024. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38373897/

[25] Li S, Zhou S, Ai X et al. Xanthoxylin as a quorum-sensing inhibitor of Aeromonas hydrophila with promising therapeutic effects. Arch Microbiol. 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42159699/

[26] Dong J, Ma X, Li S et al. Transcriptomic Analysis Reveals the Inhibitory Mechanism of Fisetin Against the Pathogenicity of Aeromonas hydrophila. Animals (Basel). 2025. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40867743/

[27] Payam B, Soltani M, Mehrgan MS et al. Saponins from sea cucumber disrupt Aeromonas hydrophila quorum sensing to mitigate pathogenicity. AMB Express. 2025. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40064727/

[28] Lu L, Wang J, Qin T et al. Carvacrol Inhibits Quorum Sensing in Opportunistic Bacterium Aeromonas hydrophila. Microorganisms. 2023. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37630587/

[29] Wang J, Qin T, Chen K et al. Antimicrobial and Antivirulence Activities of Carvacrol against Pathogenic Aeromonas hydrophila. Microorganisms. 2022. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36363761/

[30] Peng M, Tong W, Zhao Z et al. Attenuation of Aeromonas hydrophila Infection in Carassius auratus by YtnP, a N-acyl Homoserine Lactonase from Bacillus licheniformis T-1. Antibiotics (Basel). 2021. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34073161/

[31] Sun Y, Hao L, Liang J et al. Salinity-induced virulence alteration of Aeromonas hydrophila isolated from Scatophagus argus: insights from transcriptomic profiling and phenotypic characterization. BMC Microbiol. 2025. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40316893/

[32] Zhao D, Wojnarowski K, Cholewińska P et al. Transcriptomic insights into cultivation-driven virulence in Aeromonas spp.: a new approach to optimizing autogenous vaccines in aquatic veterinary medicine. Vet Res. 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41580861/

[33] Morariu F, Balta I, Stef L et al. Organic acids target key virulence factors of Aeromonas hydrophila to reduce infection in vitro. Front Microbiol. 2026. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42205576/

[34] Han P, Qin H, Hao C et al. Isolation and genomic analysis of phage BUCT551 against drug-resistant Aeromonas hydrophila. Front Vet Sci. 2025. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41078496/

[35] Liang Q, Liu G, Guo Z et al. Application of potential probiotic strain Streptomyces sp. SH5 on anti-Aeromonas infection in zebrafish larvae. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2022. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35777708/

[36] Cebeci A, Türe M, Alemdağ M et al. Whole Genome Sequence of a Novel Bacteriophage APT65 Infecting Aeromonas hydrophila. Phage (New Rochelle). 2023. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37214649/

[37] Li J, Ma S, Li Z et al. Construction and Characterization of an Aeromonas hydrophila

[38] Ghosh D, Alam SA, Mukhopadhyay SK. Genomic insights, determination of quorum quenching potential of a beta-lactamase enzyme from Chromohalobacter sp. strain D23 against Aeromonas hydrophila and molecular docking study. Int Microbiol. 2025. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40920301/

Disclaimer: This article is for educational and informational purposes only. It is not intended to substitute for professional veterinary advice, diagnosis, treatment, or regulatory guidance. Always consult a licensed veterinarian or qualified specialist regarding animal health, disease diagnosis, and therapeutic decisions.