Beef Cattle Artificial Insemination: Protocols, Timing, and Success Factors

By Dr. Zubair Khalid, DVM, MS, PhD ·

Beef Cattle Artificial Insemination: Protocols, Timing, and Success Factors

Key Takeaways

  • Estrus Synchronization Protocols: Hormonal protocols (e.g., CIDR, GnRH, PGF2α) are crucial for controlling ovulation timing, enabling fixed-time artificial insemination (FTAI) and reducing reliance on labor-intensive heat detection. Protocol selection depends on herd type (cows vs. heifers), facilities, labor availability, and nutritional status.
  • Semen Handling Precision: Semen viability is critically dependent on strict handling protocols, including thawing at 35°C for 30-40 seconds and protecting it from temperature shock. Improper handling, such as exposure to temperatures above -130°C or thawing outside the specified range, significantly reduces sperm motility and fertilization potential.
  • Insemination Technique and Timing: Successful conception requires depositing semen in the uterine body, necessitating skilled technicians who can navigate the cervix. Insemination should occur 12-18 hours after observed standing estrus or according to a fixed-time protocol, aligning with the optimal window for oocyte fertilization.
  • Critical Success Factors: Conception rates are significantly influenced by accurate heat detection (visual observation twice daily for standing estrus), appropriate cow body condition score (BCS 5-6), and technician proficiency. Missed heats, poor semen handling, improper timing, or suboptimal BCS directly reduce pregnancy rates.
  • Economic Viability and Record Keeping: AI program success is measured by pregnancy rates (typically 50-70% for cows, 55-75% for heifers) and requires meticulous record-keeping of insemination details, sire information, technician, BCS, and pregnancy outcomes. Economic analysis comparing AI costs to natural service, including genetic improvement value, is essential for adoption decisions.

Artificial insemination (AI) in beef cattle is a reproductive management tool that allows producers to access superior genetics without purchasing and maintaining a bull. Success depends on precise heat detection, correct semen handling and deposition, and appropriate timing relative to estrus or a fixed-time protocol. This article covers the core protocols, timing decisions, and factors that influence conception rates for beef producers considering or currently using AI.

At a Glance: AI Success Factors in Beef Cattle

FactorKey ConsiderationImpact on Conception Rate
Heat detection accuracyVisual observation twice daily for standing estrusMissed or incorrect heats reduce pregnancy rates
Semen handlingThaw at 35°C for 30-40 seconds, protect from temperature shockPoor handling reduces sperm viability
Timing of insemination12-18 hours after observed standing heat or fixed-time protocolImproper timing lowers fertilization success
Cow body condition score (BCS)Target BCS 5-6 (1-9 scale) at breedingThin or overconditioned cows have lower fertility
Technician skillProper deposition in uterine bodyInexperienced technicians achieve lower conception rates

Understanding Estrus Synchronization Protocols

Estrus synchronization protocols use hormones to control the timing of ovulation, allowing for fixed-time artificial insemination (FTAI) without the need for daily heat detection. Research on timed AI in beef cattle has evolved over decades, with protocols becoming more refined and reliable [<a href="#ref-1">1</a>]. The goal is to align the insemination time with the window when the oocyte is most likely to be fertilized.

Common synchronization programs include protocols based on progesterone-releasing devices (CIDR), gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH), and prostaglandin F2 alpha (PGF2α). The choice of protocol depends on the herd's management system, facilities, and whether natural service cleanup bulls will be used. Fixed-time artificial insemination programs have been implemented successfully in many beef herds, reducing labor requirements compared to heat detection alone [<a href="#ref-2">2</a>].

Producers should select a protocol based on their specific goals. For example, a 7-day CO-Synch + CIDR protocol is widely used for beef heifers and cows. This protocol involves inserting a CIDR device and giving GnRH on day 0, removing the CIDR and giving PGF2α on day 7, and then giving a second dose of GnRH at the time of FTAI on day 9 or 10. The exact timing of the second GnRH and insemination varies by protocol version.

Control of the estrous cycle to improve fertility for fixed-time AI has been reviewed extensively, with emphasis on understanding the physiological mechanisms that allow precise ovulation timing [<a href="#ref-3">3</a>]. Synchronization and AI strategies in beef cattle continue to be refined through research published in veterinary clinical literature [<a href="#ref-4">4</a>]. Producers in South America have also developed programs for fixed-time AI that adapt protocols to local conditions and cattle types [<a href="#ref-5">5</a>].

Protocol Selection Criteria

When choosing a synchronization protocol, consider the following factors:

  • Herd type: Cows versus heifers respond differently to hormones. Heifers often require protocols with higher progesterone levels to suppress estrus effectively.
  • Facilities: Protocols requiring multiple handling events need well-designed working facilities to minimize stress on cattle and workers.
  • Labor availability: Fixed-time protocols reduce the need for heat detection but require precise scheduling of hormone administration.
  • Cleanup bull availability: If natural service bulls will be used after AI, the synchronization protocol must account for the timing of bull introduction.
  • Nutritional status: Cows with poor body condition may not respond consistently to synchronization protocols.

Common Protocol Options

ProtocolHormones UsedHandling EventsBest For
CO-Synch + CIDR (7-day)GnRH, CIDR, PGF2α, GnRH3Cows and heifers
Select SynchGnRH, PGF2α2Cows with good heat detection
MGA + PGF2αMelengestrol acetate, PGF2α2Heifers
5-day CO-Synch + CIDRGnRH, CIDR, PGF2α, GnRH3Cows with high fertility

Heat Detection Methods and Accuracy

Accurate heat detection is critical for AI success when using protocols that require insemination based on observed estrus. Standing to be mounted is the most reliable sign of estrus. Other secondary signs include mounting other cows, restlessness, bellowing, clear mucus discharge, and a swollen red vulva.

Visual observation should be conducted at least twice daily for 30 minutes each session, ideally in the early morning and late evening. Some producers use heat detection aids such as chin-ball markers, pressure-sensitive mount detectors, or electronic activity monitors. These tools can improve detection rates but require proper maintenance and interpretation.

The accuracy of heat detection directly affects conception rates. Inseminating a cow that is not in true estrus wastes semen and labor. Conversely, missing a heat event means the cow will not be bred during that cycle. Producers should keep records of observed heats and compare them to expected cycle lengths (18-24 days) to identify cows that may have been missed.

Practical Heat Detection Steps

  1. Observe cows twice daily for at least 30 minutes per session.
  2. Record all standing events and secondary signs.
  3. Use heat detection aids to supplement visual observation.
  4. Compare observed heat dates to expected cycle lengths.
  5. Investigate cows that do not show heat within 24 days of the previous estrus.

Limitations of Heat Detection

Heat detection is labor-intensive and requires consistent effort. Cows in large pastures or with limited visibility may be difficult to observe. Some cows show estrus during the night or early morning, which can be missed with twice-daily observation. Fixed-time AI protocols eliminate the need for heat detection but require precise hormone administration.

Semen Handling and Thawing Procedures

Semen quality is preserved only when handling protocols are followed precisely. Semen straws are stored in liquid nitrogen at -196°C. Any temperature increase above -130°C can damage sperm cells. The following steps are critical:

  • Remove the straw from the liquid nitrogen tank using forceps, not bare hands.
  • Thaw the straw in a water bath at 35°C for 30-40 seconds. Do not exceed 40 seconds.
  • Dry the straw thoroughly before loading into the insemination gun.
  • Protect the loaded gun from cold shock and direct sunlight.
  • Inseminate within 10-15 minutes of thawing.

Semen should be stored in a properly maintained liquid nitrogen tank. The tank must be checked regularly for liquid nitrogen level and should be stored in a clean, dry, well-ventilated area. Do not store semen in a tank that has been empty or low for more than a few days, as the temperature may have risen above safe levels.

Semen Handling Checklist

StepActionCritical Point
StorageMaintain liquid nitrogen level above strawsCheck tank every 2 weeks
RetrievalUse forceps, not bare handsAvoid warming straw
Thawing35°C water bath for 30-40 secondsDo not exceed 40 seconds
DryingWipe straw dryRemove water to prevent cold shock
LoadingCut straw at crimped end, load into gunAvoid touching cut end
ProtectionKeep gun in warm pocket or insulated sleeveProtect from cold and sunlight
TimingInseminate within 10-15 minutesDo not delay after thawing

Common Semen Handling Errors

  • Thawing in warm water that is too hot or too cold
  • Leaving straws exposed to air for more than a few seconds
  • Touching the straw with bare hands
  • Loading the gun with a wet straw
  • Exposing the loaded gun to direct sunlight or cold wind
  • Inseminating more than 15 minutes after thawing

Insemination Technique and Deposition Site

The goal of AI is to deposit semen into the uterine body, not into the cervix or one of the uterine horns. Proper technique requires practice and skill. The inseminator should:

  • Restrain the cow in a squeeze chute or head gate.
  • Clean the vulva with a paper towel to remove manure and debris.
  • Insert the insemination gun at a 30-45 degree angle upward to avoid the urethral opening.
  • Advance the gun through the cervix using gentle manipulation. The cervix has three to four rings that must be navigated.
  • Once the gun tip is through the cervix, advance it slightly into the uterine body.
  • Depress the plunger slowly to deposit the semen.
  • Withdraw the gun gently.

If the gun cannot be passed through the cervix, do not force it. Reposition the cervix by rectal manipulation and try again. If resistance persists, the cow may have a cervical abnormality or be in the wrong stage of the cycle. Record the difficulty and consult a veterinarian if the problem is recurrent.

Technician Skill Assessment

Technician skill is a major factor in AI success. Inexperienced technicians should receive training from an experienced inseminator or attend a certified AI school. Regular evaluation of technique is recommended. Key indicators of technician proficiency include:

  • Ability to pass the gun through the cervix within 30 seconds
  • Consistent deposition of semen in the uterine body
  • Low rate of post-insemination bleeding or discharge
  • Conception rates comparable to or better than herd average

Records and Measurements for AI Programs

Maintaining accurate records is essential for evaluating AI program success and making management decisions. Key records include:

  • Cow identification (ear tag, tattoo, or RFID)
  • Date and time of observed heat or synchronization protocol start
  • Date and time of insemination
  • Semen sire and lot number
  • Technician name
  • Body condition score at breeding
  • Any health treatments or abnormalities

Pregnancy diagnosis should be performed by a veterinarian via ultrasound or rectal palpation 30-60 days after insemination. The pregnancy rate is calculated as the number of cows confirmed pregnant divided by the number of cows inseminated. This rate should be compared to industry benchmarks and previous herd performance.

Conception rates for beef AI programs typically range from 50% to 70% for cows and 55% to 75% for heifers, depending on management, nutrition, and technician skill. Fixed-time AI programs can achieve rates comparable to or better than AI based on observed heat, especially when heat detection is inconsistent.

Record Keeping Template

Cow IDBreed DateSireTechnicianBCSHeat Detection MethodPregnancy ResultNotes
1012024-05-15Angus 1Smith5VisualPositive
1022024-05-15Angus 1Smith4VisualNegativeThin at breeding
1032024-05-16Hereford 2Jones6CIDRPositive

Key Performance Indicators

  • Pregnancy rate: Number pregnant divided by number inseminated
  • Conception rate: Number pregnant divided by number of inseminations (including repeats)
  • Service rate: Number inseminated divided by number eligible
  • Return rate: Number returning to estrus after AI divided by number inseminated
  • Calving rate: Number of live calves born divided by number of cows confirmed pregnant

Common Failure Patterns in Beef AI Programs

Several factors can reduce AI success rates. Identifying and addressing these issues is critical for program improvement.

Failure PatternPossible CauseCorrective Action
Low pregnancy ratePoor heat detection, improper timing, low semen qualityReview detection protocols, verify semen handling, check tank temperature
High return rateEarly embryonic death, disease, poor nutritionEvaluate BCS, test for reproductive diseases, review mineral program
Technician inconsistencyInadequate training, improper techniqueRetrain technician, observe technique, consider using a different inseminator
Synchronization failureIncorrect hormone administration, expired productsVerify product storage and expiration, review injection technique
Low conception in heifersUnderdeveloped reproductive tract, poor nutritionEnsure heifers reach target weight before breeding, improve nutrition

Analysis of factors affecting AI success in beef cattle has been documented in multiple regions. Studies in Indonesia have examined the influence of AI cost on profitability [<a href="#ref-6">6</a>], factors affecting success in specific districts [<a href="#ref-7">7</a>], causes of low pregnancy rates [<a href="#ref-8">8</a>], program implementation in regencies [<a href="#ref-9">9</a>], and evaluation of factors influencing success through government programs [<a href="#ref-10">10</a>]. These studies consistently identify technician skill, cow nutrition, heat detection accuracy, and timing as critical variables.

Troubleshooting Low Pregnancy Rates

When pregnancy rates fall below 50%, conduct a systematic investigation:

  1. Review semen handling records for temperature deviations or expired straws.
  2. Observe technician technique for proper cervical passage and semen deposition.
  3. Evaluate cow body condition scores and nutritional program.
  4. Check synchronization protocol compliance and product expiration dates.
  5. Test for reproductive diseases such as BVD, leptospirosis, or trichomoniasis.
  6. Assess heat detection accuracy by comparing observed heats to expected cycle lengths.

Welfare and Safety Considerations

AI is generally less stressful for cattle than natural service with a bull, as it eliminates the risk of injury from mounting and fighting. However, proper handling is essential to minimize stress. Cows should be moved calmly through the facility. Avoid using electric prods. The insemination process should be quick and gentle.

For the technician, safety is paramount. Cows in heat can be unpredictable. Always work in a properly designed squeeze chute with head restraint. Wear appropriate footwear with good traction. Have an escape route planned. Do not work alone if possible.

Biosecurity is also important. Use clean gloves for each cow. Clean the vulva before insemination to reduce the risk of introducing bacteria into the reproductive tract. Do not use the same insemination gun for multiple cows without proper cleaning between uses.

Welfare Indicators During AI

  • Calm behavior during handling and restraint
  • No excessive vocalization or struggling
  • Quick completion of the insemination procedure (under 2 minutes)
  • No injury or bleeding after the procedure
  • Normal return to feeding and social behavior

Safety Equipment Checklist

  • Squeeze chute with head gate in good working condition
  • Non-slip flooring in the working area
  • Gloves for each cow
  • Paper towels for cleaning the vulva
  • Insemination gun with protective sheath
  • Warm water bath for thawing semen
  • Liquid nitrogen tank with adequate nitrogen level

Professional Escalation Criteria

Some situations require veterinary involvement. Contact a veterinarian if:

  • Pregnancy rates are consistently below 50% after two breeding seasons.
  • More than 10% of cows have difficulty passing the insemination gun through the cervix.
  • Cows show signs of reproductive disease such as vaginal discharge, retained placenta, or abortion.
  • Synchronization protocols do not produce expected results.
  • Semen quality is suspected to be compromised due to tank failure or handling errors.

A veterinarian can perform reproductive tract examinations, test for diseases such as bovine viral diarrhea (BVD) or leptospirosis, and recommend adjustments to the synchronization protocol or nutrition program.

When to Escalate Immediately

  • Suspected tank failure with complete loss of liquid nitrogen
  • Multiple cows with abnormal vaginal discharge after AI
  • Abortion storms affecting more than 5% of pregnant cows
  • Severe injury to a cow or technician during the AI procedure
  • Suspected hormone administration errors

Economic Decision Framework for AI Program Adoption

Deciding whether to implement or expand an artificial insemination program in a beef herd requires a structured economic analysis that accounts for both direct costs and opportunity costs. Producers must evaluate AI against natural service using a bull, considering factors such as herd size, genetic improvement goals, labor availability, and facility constraints. The influence of AI cost on profitability has been documented in beef cattle operations, with studies showing that the economic outcome depends on conception rates, semen costs, and the value of improved genetics [<a href="#ref-6">6</a>]. A systematic decision framework helps producers avoid common financial mistakes and set realistic expectations for program returns.

Cost Comparison: AI Versus Natural Service

The first step in the decision framework is to calculate the per-pregnancy cost for both AI and natural service. For natural service, the annual cost of maintaining a bull includes purchase price depreciation, feed, veterinary care, mineral supplementation, and the risk of injury or death. A mature bull typically services 25 to 40 cows per breeding season. For AI, the costs include semen, hormones, liquid nitrogen, supplies, technician fees or training, and the labor required for heat detection and handling. The per-pregnancy cost for AI decreases as conception rates improve and as more cows are bred per technician visit.

A simple comparison can be made using the following formula:

  • Natural service cost per pregnancy: (Annual bull cost) / (Number of cows pregnant per bull per year)
  • AI cost per pregnancy: (Total AI program cost) / (Number of cows confirmed pregnant)

Producers should also account for the genetic value of the calves produced. AI allows access to proven sires with known expected progeny differences (EPDs) for growth, carcass quality, and maternal traits. The premium paid for AI-sired calves at weaning or sale can offset higher upfront costs. Studies evaluating factors affecting AI success in beef cattle have identified that the economic benefit of AI is maximized when conception rates exceed 50% and when superior genetics are selected [<a href="#ref-7">7</a>].

Break-Even Analysis for AI Investment

A break-even analysis helps producers determine the minimum conception rate required for AI to be more profitable than natural service. The calculation compares the cost per pregnancy for AI at different conception rates against the cost per pregnancy for natural service. For example, if a bull costs $3,000 per year to maintain and services 30 cows with an 85% pregnancy rate, the cost per pregnancy is approximately $118. If AI costs $40 per insemination (including semen, hormones, and supplies) and the conception rate is 60%, the cost per pregnancy is $67. At a 40% conception rate, the cost per pregnancy rises to $100, and at 30%, it reaches $133.

The break-even conception rate is the point where AI cost per pregnancy equals natural service cost per pregnancy. Producers should calculate this threshold using their specific costs and bull performance data. If the expected conception rate is below the break-even point, AI may not be economically justified unless genetic improvement provides additional value.

Record System for Economic Tracking

Accurate records are essential for evaluating the financial performance of an AI program. The following record system captures both reproductive and economic data:

Record CategoryData to CollectPurpose
Semen inventorySire, lot number, purchase date, cost per straw, number of straws usedTrack semen cost per insemination
Hormone inventoryProduct name, expiration date, cost per dose, number of doses usedTrack synchronization cost per cow
Labor recordsHours spent on heat detection, handling, inseminationCalculate labor cost per pregnancy
Pregnancy outcomesCow ID, insemination date, pregnancy diagnosis date, resultCalculate conception rate and cost per pregnancy
Calf valueWeaning weight, sale price, genetic meritAssess return on genetic investment

Producers should review these records annually to identify trends and make adjustments. For example, if labor costs are high due to poor heat detection, switching to a fixed-time AI protocol may reduce labor while maintaining or improving conception rates. Implementing fixed-time AI programs in beef herds has been shown to reduce labor requirements while achieving acceptable pregnancy rates [<a href="#ref-2">2</a>].

Common Economic Failure Patterns

Several economic failure patterns can undermine the profitability of an AI program:

Failure PatternCauseCorrective Action
High cost per pregnancyLow conception rate, expensive semen, excessive hormone useImprove heat detection or switch to fixed-time AI, select cost-effective semen, review protocol compliance
Poor genetic returnSelecting sires without proven EPDs for the target marketUse sires with EPDs for weaning weight, carcass quality, or maternal traits as appropriate
Hidden labor costsUnderestimating time required for heat detection and handlingTrack actual labor hours, consider fixed-time AI to reduce labor
Synchronization wasteUsing hormones on cows with poor body condition or reproductive healthPre-screen cows for BCS and reproductive soundness before starting protocol
Semen wasteThawing more straws than needed, improper handlingThaw only the number of straws that can be used within 15 minutes, train technicians on proper handling

Studies examining causes of low pregnancy rates in beef cattle AI programs have consistently identified poor nutrition, inadequate heat detection, and technician error as primary factors [<a href="#ref-8">8</a>]. These same factors drive economic failure by increasing the cost per pregnancy. Producers should address these issues before expanding the AI program.

Decision Matrix for AI Adoption

The following decision matrix helps producers evaluate whether AI is appropriate for their operation:

FactorFavorable for AIUnfavorable for AI
Herd size20 to 100 cowsFewer than 10 cows or more than 200 cows without adequate facilities
FacilitiesGood working chute and head gate, handling pensPoor facilities that cause stress or injury
Labor availabilityDedicated person available for heat detection and handlingLimited labor during breeding season
Technician skillTrained inseminator or access to professional AI serviceNo trained personnel available
Genetic goalsWant to improve specific traits with proven siresSatisfied with current bull genetics
Nutrition programCows maintain BCS 5-6 year-roundCows frequently thin or overconditioned
Reproductive healthHerd free of reproductive diseasesHistory of BVD, leptospirosis, or trichomoniasis

Producers who score favorably on most factors are likely to achieve economic success with AI. Those with unfavorable factors should address the limiting issues before investing in an AI program. Evaluation of factors influencing AI success in beef cattle programs has shown that addressing management deficiencies before implementation improves outcomes [<a href="#ref-10">10</a>].

Professional Escalation for Economic Decisions

Consult a veterinarian or agricultural economist if:

  • The break-even analysis shows AI is not profitable at current conception rates.
  • Herd size or facilities limit the ability to implement AI efficiently.
  • Genetic improvement goals are unclear or not aligned with market demands.
  • The cost of AI exceeds the expected return after three breeding seasons.
  • Multiple economic failure patterns are present simultaneously.

A professional can help design a customized AI program that fits the operation's financial and management constraints. They can also assist with selecting sires that match the herd's genetic goals and market opportunities.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long after standing heat should I inseminate a beef cow?

Inseminate 12 to 18 hours after first observing standing heat. This timing allows sperm to be present in the reproductive tract when ovulation occurs, which typically happens 24 to 30 hours after the onset of estrus.

What is the difference between AI and fixed-time AI?

Traditional AI requires detecting standing heat and inseminating based on that observation. Fixed-time AI uses hormones to synchronize ovulation so that all cows can be inseminated at a predetermined time without heat detection.

Can I use AI on heifers?

Yes, but heifers require careful management. They must reach at least 65% of mature body weight before breeding. Heifers also tend to have shorter and less intense estrus periods, making heat detection more challenging. Fixed-time AI protocols are often recommended for heifers.

How much does AI cost compared to buying a bull?

AI costs include semen, hormones, technician fees, and supplies. The cost per pregnancy is often lower than purchasing and maintaining a bull, especially for small herds. However, AI requires more labor and management attention.

What body condition score is best for AI success?

A body condition score of 5 to 6 on a 1 to 9 scale is ideal. Cows that are too thin (BCS less than 4) or too fat (BCS greater than 7) have lower conception rates. Nutrition should be managed to achieve target BCS before the breeding season.

How long can semen be stored in a liquid nitrogen tank?

Semen can be stored indefinitely as long as the tank is maintained properly and the liquid nitrogen level is kept above the straws. Tanks should be checked every two weeks and refilled as needed.

What should I do if the insemination gun will not pass through the cervix?

Do not force the gun. Reposition the cervix by rectal manipulation and try again. If resistance persists, the cow may have a cervical abnormality or be in the wrong stage of the cycle. Record the difficulty and consult a veterinarian if the problem is recurrent.

How do I know if my AI program is successful?

Calculate the pregnancy rate by dividing the number of cows confirmed pregnant by the number of cows inseminated. Compare this rate to industry benchmarks (50-70% for cows, 55-75% for heifers) and to your herd's previous performance. Also track the percentage of cows that return to estrus after AI.

Related Farming Guides

Related Clinical & Scientific Guides

References and Further Reading

[1] [Research on timed AI in beef cattle: Past, present and future, a 27-year perspective.](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37639998). Theriogenology, 2023. [2] [Implementing Fixed-Time Artificial Insemination Programs in Beef Herds.](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37684109). The Veterinary clinics of North America. Food animal practice, 2024. [3] [Control of the estrous cycle to improve fertility for fixed-time artificial insemination in beef cattle: a review.](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19783709). Journal of animal science, 2010. [4] [Synchronization and Artificial Insemination Strategies in Beef Cattle.](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27140297). The Veterinary clinics of North America. Food animal practice, 2016. [5] [Programs for fixed-time artificial insemination in South American beef cattle.](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36249833). Animal reproduction, 2018. [6] [The influence of Artificial Insemination (AI) cost to profitability of beef cattle farming in Banjarnegara District, Central Java Province, Indonesia](https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/247/1/012046). Iop Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science, 2019. [7] [Analysis of Factors Affecting the Success of Beef Cattle Artificial Insemination (AI) in Jepon District, Blora Regency](https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1364/1/012038). Iop Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science, 2024. [8] [Causes of low pregnancy rates in beef cattle through artificial insemination technology in Soppeng Regency (case study: Performance of the 2018 UPSUS SIWAB)](https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/492/1/012154). Iop Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science, 2020. [9] [Artificial Insemination Program of Beef Cattle in Manokwari Regency](https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/518/1/012011). Iop Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science, 2020. [10] [Evaluation of factor influencing the success of Artificial Insemination (AI) of beef cattle through UPSUS SIWAB program in Deli Serdang Regency, Sumatera Utara Province, Indonesia](https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/454/1/012055). Iop Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science, 2020.

This article is educational and is not a substitute for veterinary diagnosis, treatment, public-health guidance, or regulatory reporting.