Research Program Director Jobs: Leadership Roles in Academic Research

Research program directors in academic settings hold formal responsibility for the design, execution, compliance, and continuous improvement of research programs, often spanning multiple projects, teams, and institutional boundaries. This role differs from a research program manager in that the director typically holds authority over scientific direction, resource allocation, and regulatory accountability, while the manager focuses on operational coordination, scheduling, and day-to-day logistics. For students, researchers, and life-science professionals considering this career path, the practical question is also how to find these jobs but also what competencies, records, and institutional relationships the role demands. This article explains the core responsibilities, the director versus manager distinction, the skills that hiring committees evaluate, and the career steps that lead to program leadership in academic research.

Defining the Research Program Director Role in Academia

A research program director in an academic institution is the individual who carries ultimate accountability for a defined portfolio of research activity. That portfolio may be a single large multicenter study, a training program, a core facility, or a thematic research area spanning several laboratories. The director answers to institutional leadership, funding agencies, and in many cases external regulatory bodies. The role combines scientific judgment with administrative authority, and it requires the director to translate institutional policy into daily research practice.

The Office of Intramural Training and Education at the National Institutes of Health provides structured pathways for researchers who want to develop the leadership and management skills that program director roles require. These pathways matter because academic research institutions increasingly expect program directors to demonstrate formal training in research administration, also scientific productivity. The U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics Life, Physical, and Social Science Occupations page documents the broad occupational family that includes research directors, while the Healthcare Occupations page covers the clinical research leadership roles that overlap with academic medicine. Both sources confirm that these occupations require advanced education and that management responsibility increases with seniority.

The director role sits at the intersection of three accountability streams. First, the director is accountable to the institution for financial stewardship, compliance, and alignment with strategic priorities. Second, the director is accountable to funders for meeting stated aims, producing deliverables, and reporting progress. Third, the director is accountable to the research team for creating an environment where rigorous science can proceed. A study of medical director functions in healthcare institutions describes this dual character well, noting that the director must serve the institutional constitution and job description while also exercising supervisory authority over the quality of the system The function of a medical director in healthcare institutions: a master or a servant. The same logic applies to research program directors, who serve institutional rules while leading the people who do the work.

Program Director Versus Program Manager

The distinction between program director and program manager is one of the most common sources of confusion for job seekers. The two roles are complementary but not interchangeable.

A program manager handles the operational machinery of a research program. This includes maintaining calendars, coordinating meetings, tracking deliverables, managing data collection timelines, preparing progress reports, and serving as the communication hub among stakeholders. The manager ensures that the program runs on schedule and that information flows correctly. The O*NET OnLine database, maintained by the U.S. Department of Labor, classifies these operational roles separately from top-level research leadership, reflecting the different skill sets involved.

A program director, by contrast, holds decision-making authority over the scientific and strategic direction of the program. The director determines which research questions take priority, how resources are allocated across projects, how compliance risks are managed, and how the program responds to unexpected findings or regulatory changes. The director also carries the external accountability if the program fails to meet its obligations.

The practical implication for job seekers is that the two career tracks require different evidence of capability. A program manager role can be an entry point into research administration, but moving to a director role requires demonstrating scientific judgment, regulatory knowledge, and leadership experience. A study of graduate medical education program coordinator job descriptions found that job titles vary widely across institutions and that the responsibilities assigned to similar roles differ substantially An Analysis of Graduate Medical Education Program Coordinator Job Descriptions. That variability means job seekers must read each posting carefully instead of assume that a title carries a standard set of duties.

Core Responsibilities of an Academic Research Program Director

Scientific Direction and Priority Setting

The director defines what the program is trying to accomplish and how the team will get there. This involves setting research questions, choosing methods, interpreting results, and deciding when to change course. The director must balance scientific ambition with practical constraints such as budget, personnel capacity, and timeline. In a training program, the director also shapes the curriculum and the developmental experiences of trainees. In a research program, the director shapes the portfolio of projects and the allocation of effort across them.

Compliance and Regulatory Oversight

Research programs operate within a dense regulatory environment. The director is responsible for ensuring that the program complies with institutional policies, funder requirements, and applicable regulations. This includes human subjects protections, animal welfare standards, data integrity, conflict of interest management, and biosafety. A study of a remediation program for researchers who violated research rules found that violations can cause significant problems for human participants, animal subjects, data integrity, institutions, and investigators The Professionalism and Integrity in Research Program: Description and Preliminary Outcomes. The same study reported that after training, participants showed significant increases in behaviors such as training research staff to foster compliance, using standard operating procedures, performing self-audits, and actively overseeing the work of the research team. These behaviors are the daily work of a research program director.

Financial Stewardship

Program directors control budgets that may include salary support, equipment, supplies, travel, and participant costs. The director must ensure that funds are spent according to the approved budget, that expenditures are documented, and that the program does not overspend. This requires regular review of financial reports and the ability to make adjustments when actual costs diverge from projections. Directors also participate in preparing budgets for new proposals and in justifying budget revisions to funders.

Personnel Management and Mentorship

Research programs depend on the people who do the work. The director hires, supervises, and evaluates staff, postdoctoral fellows, graduate students, and technical personnel. The director also has a mentoring responsibility, particularly in training programs where the development of early-career researchers is an explicit program goal. A study of pediatric residency program leaders found that program leaders spend a significant amount of time supporting resident well-being, even though this responsibility is often not written into their job descriptions Pediatric Program Leadership's Contribution Toward Resident Wellness. The same study found that most program leaders wanted more training in how to support trainee well-being. Research program directors should expect to devote substantial time to the human dimensions of their programs and should seek training in mentorship and wellness support.

Communication and Reporting

The director is the public face of the program. This includes reporting to funders, presenting to institutional leadership, publishing results, and communicating with external partners. The director must be able to summarize complex scientific and administrative information for different audiences. A study of residency program websites found that programs often fail to convey important information to prospective applicants, with most programs reporting less than half of the criteria that applicants seek Evaluation of otolaryngology residency program websites. This finding illustrates a broader principle: program leaders who control how their program is presented to the outside world shape the program's reputation and its ability to attract talent.

Required Skills and Competencies

Scientific Expertise

A research program director must have enough scientific depth to evaluate the work of the team and to make credible judgments about methods and interpretation. In most academic settings, this means a doctoral degree in a relevant field plus a record of research productivity. The U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics Life, Physical, and Social Science Occupations page confirms that most life and physical science occupations require a master's or doctoral degree for entry, and leadership roles typically require more.

Regulatory and Compliance Knowledge

Directors must understand the rules that govern their research. This includes institutional policies, funder terms, and federal regulations. The knowledge is specific to the research domain. A clinical research program director must understand human subjects protections and clinical trial regulations. A basic science program director must understand biosafety and animal welfare rules. A data-intensive program director must understand data sharing and privacy requirements. The National Center for Biotechnology Information and PubMed are essential tools for directors who need to stay current with the scientific literature and with policy developments that affect their programs.

Financial and Administrative Skills

Directors must be able to read budgets, track expenditures, and make resource allocation decisions. This requires comfort with spreadsheets, financial reports, and institutional accounting systems. Directors also need project management skills to keep complex programs on schedule. The O*NET OnLine database provides detailed information about the administrative and management skills required for leadership occupations, and job seekers can use it to identify the specific competencies they need to develop.

Leadership and Communication

Directors must motivate teams, resolve conflicts, and communicate effectively with diverse stakeholders. This includes written communication for reports and proposals, oral communication for presentations and meetings, and interpersonal communication for mentoring and supervision. A study of factors affecting employee careers found that competence, transformational leadership, social capital, and performance all influence career advancement, with performance having the strongest direct effect Influence of Competence, Transformational Leadership, Social Capital and Performance on Employee Careers. For research program directors, this means that demonstrated performance in research and administration is the foundation for career advancement, but leadership behavior and professional networks also matter.

Data and Technology Literacy

Modern research programs generate and depend on large amounts of data. Directors must understand data management principles, data sharing requirements, and the basic tools used for data analysis and visualization. A program that trained academic library professionals to use the All of Us Researcher Workbench found that structured training in data skills can build institutional research capacity and help participants overcome barriers to data access Advancing data-driven health research from the All of Us data training and engagement program. Research program directors should expect to invest in their own data skills and to support data training for their teams.

At a Glance

Career Pathways to Research Program Director

Building a Research Foundation

The most common pathway to a research program director role begins with a doctoral degree and a period of independent research. This foundation provides the scientific credibility that directors need to evaluate the work of others and to make judgments about research direction. The Office of Intramural Training and Education at the National Institutes of Health offers training programs for postdoctoral fellows and early-career researchers who want to develop the skills needed for research leadership. These programs cover topics such as grant writing, lab management, mentorship, and responsible conduct of research.

Developing Leadership Experience

Research program director roles require demonstrated leadership, also scientific productivity. Early-career researchers should seek opportunities to lead small projects, mentor junior team members, serve on institutional committees, and take responsibility for compliance tasks. These experiences provide evidence of leadership capability that hiring committees evaluate. A study of early career researchers in Africa found that research leadership is essential to building research capacity and that there is consensus on the need for training programs that develop research leaders Pathways to research leadership for early career researchers in Africa: A potential role for African and Global Funders. The same study noted that research leaders need competencies that go beyond scientific excellence, including the ability to build teams, manage resources, and connect research to societal goals.

Transitioning from Clinical or Technical Roles

Some research program directors come from clinical or technical backgrounds instead of from traditional academic research careers. A study of Certified Registered Nurse Anesthetists transitioning to academia found that these professionals often enter academic roles through a natural progression that includes early teaching opportunities and professional connections, but they frequently lack formal mentorship and accessible resources during the transition A Qualitative Descriptive Study on the CRNA Transition to Academia. The same study found that sustained commitment to academic careers depends on legacy building, flexibility, and institutional benefits. Professionals considering this transition should seek formal mentorship and orientation programs instead of assuming they will learn the academic side of the role on their own.

Pursuing Formal Training in Research Administration

Formal training in research administration can accelerate the path to program director roles. This training may take the form of certificate programs, workshops, or graduate degrees in research administration, higher education administration, or public health. The Office of Intramural Training and Education at the National Institutes of Health provides resources for researchers at all career stages who want to develop administrative and leadership skills. The O*NET OnLine database can help job seekers identify the specific skills and knowledge areas that research leadership occupations require.

Practical Steps for Finding Research Program Director Jobs

Search Strategically

Research program director jobs are posted through multiple channels. University job boards, professional society career centers, and general job search platforms all carry these positions. The O*NET OnLine database can help job seekers understand the occupational classification of research leadership roles and identify related job titles that may appear in postings. Because job titles vary widely across institutions, as documented in the study of program coordinator job descriptions An Analysis of Graduate Medical Education Program Coordinator Job Descriptions, job seekers should search using multiple title variations, including program director, research director, center director, and training director.

Read Job Descriptions Carefully

Job descriptions for research program director roles vary substantially in the responsibilities they assign and the qualifications they require. Some postings emphasize scientific leadership, while others emphasize administrative management. Some require a doctoral degree, while others accept a master's degree with substantial experience. Job seekers should read each posting carefully and assess whether their experience matches the specific responsibilities described. The study of program coordinator job descriptions found that more than half of the reviewed descriptions included 5 to 8 of the 9 responsibilities defined by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education, while only about a third covered all 9 An Analysis of Graduate Medical Education Program Coordinator Job Descriptions. This variability means that a candidate who does not match every line of a posting may still be a strong fit for the actual responsibilities of the role.

Prepare Evidence of Leadership

Hiring committees for research program director roles evaluate evidence of leadership capability. Candidates should prepare examples of programs they have led, teams they have supervised, budgets they have managed, and compliance challenges they have resolved. These examples should be specific and should include measurable outcomes where possible. The study of factors affecting employee careers found that performance has the strongest direct influence on career advancement Influence of Competence, Transformational Leadership, Social Capital and Performance on Employee Careers. Candidates should be prepared to document their performance in concrete terms.

Build a Professional Network

Professional networks are important for learning about research program director jobs and for building the reputation that leads to offers. Candidates should attend conferences, serve on committees, and maintain relationships with colleagues across institutions. The study of women in science careers found that organizational practices and networks influence career advancement A Summary Report from the Research Partnership on Women in Science Careers. Building a network is particularly important for candidates from groups that are underrepresented in research leadership, who may face additional barriers to advancement.

Records and Measurements for Program Directors

What to Track

Research program directors should maintain records that document the performance of their programs and their own leadership effectiveness. These records serve multiple purposes: they support reporting to funders, they provide evidence for performance reviews, and they help directors identify problems before they become crises.

The following records are essential for research program directors:

How to Use Records

Records are useful only when they are reviewed and acted upon. Directors should establish regular review cycles for each record type. Financial records should be reviewed monthly. Compliance records should be reviewed whenever new protocols are approved or when incidents occur. Program metrics should be reviewed at least quarterly. The review should lead to decisions, also to documentation. A study of a remediation program for research rule violations found that performing self-audits of research operations and actively overseeing the work of the research team were behaviors that increased after training The Professionalism and Integrity in Research Program: Description and Preliminary Outcomes. These behaviors are the practical expression of record-based management.

Limitations of Records

Records have limitations that directors should recognize. Records document what happened, but they do not always explain why it happened. A budget variance may reflect poor planning, changed circumstances, or an accounting error. A compliance incident may reflect individual error, systemic weakness, or unclear policy. Directors must combine record review with direct observation and conversation to understand the full picture. Records also have gaps. Not everything that matters is captured in a formal record, and directors should be cautious about making decisions based solely on what is documented.

Common Failure Patterns in Research Program Direction

Compliance Failures

The most serious failure pattern for research program directors is noncompliance with regulatory requirements. This can take many forms, including lapses in human subjects protections, animal welfare violations, data fabrication or falsification, and failure to report adverse events. A study of a remediation program for researchers who violated research rules found that violations can cause significant problems for human participants, animal subjects, data integrity, institutions, and investigators The Professionalism and Integrity in Research Program: Description and Preliminary Outcomes. The same study found that training in evidence-based decision-making strategies helped researchers compensate for bias, uncertainty, and work-related stress. Directors should treat compliance as a continuous responsibility, not a periodic check.

Scope Creep and Mission Drift

Research programs can lose focus over time. New opportunities arise, funders request additional activities, and team members pursue their own interests. Without active management, the program can expand beyond its stated aims and available resources. Directors must be willing to say no to opportunities that do not align with the program's mission and to reallocate resources when the program drifts off course.

Communication Breakdowns

Research programs involve many stakeholders with different information needs. Funders want progress reports. Institutional leadership wants budget updates. Team members want direction and feedback. External partners want coordination. When communication breaks down, stakeholders make decisions based on incomplete or outdated information, and the program suffers. Directors must establish regular communication rhythms and ensure that information flows to the right people at the right time.

Personnel Problems

Research programs depend on the people who do the work, and personnel problems can undermine even well-designed programs. These problems include inadequate training, unclear expectations, unresolved conflicts, and burnout. A study of pediatric program leaders found that supporting resident well-being is an important part of the leadership role, even though it is often not included in job descriptions Pediatric Program Leadership's Contribution Toward Resident Wellness. Directors should expect to spend time on personnel issues and should seek training in mentorship and conflict resolution.

Financial Mismanagement

Research programs can fail financially when budgets are not monitored, when costs exceed projections, or when funds are spent on activities that are not allowed by the funder. Directors must review financial reports regularly and must be willing to make difficult decisions when the budget requires it. Financial mismanagement can damage the director's reputation and the institution's relationship with funders.

Welfare and Safety Context for Research Program Directors

Research program directors have a responsibility for the welfare and safety of the people and animals involved in their programs. This responsibility has several dimensions.

For human participants in research, the director must ensure that protocols are reviewed and approved, that informed consent is obtained properly, and that adverse events are reported. The Healthcare Occupations page from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics documents the regulatory environment for clinical research occupations, and the Office of Intramural Training and Education at the National Institutes of Health provides training resources for researchers who work with human participants.

For animal subjects, the director must ensure that protocols are reviewed and approved, that animal welfare standards are met, and that personnel are trained in proper animal care. The National Center for Biotechnology Information and PubMed provide access to the scientific literature on animal welfare and research ethics.

For research personnel, the director must ensure that the work environment is safe, that training is adequate, and that team members are not subjected to harassment or discrimination. A study of women in science careers found that gender biases, stereotypes, and structural obstacles substantially hinder women's career advancement Gender-Based Challenges in Women's Leadership Careers: A Literature Synthesis. A qualitative study of West African women researchers found that gender norms assigning domestic tasks to women reduced the time they could dedicate to research and that gender-insensitive organizational culture made it more difficult for women to attain leadership positions Barriers of West African women scientists in their research and academic careers: A qualitative research. Directors must actively work to create environments where all team members can succeed.

Professional Escalation Criteria

Research program directors should know when to escalate a problem to institutional leadership, to funders, or to regulatory authorities. The following situations require escalation:

Serious Compliance Incidents

Any incident that involves harm to human participants, animal subjects, or data integrity should be escalated immediately. This includes protocol violations, adverse events, suspected data fabrication, and animal welfare concerns. The director should notify the appropriate institutional office, which may include the institutional review board, the institutional animal care and use committee, the research integrity office, or the office of research compliance. The Professionalism and Integrity in Research Program study documents the serious consequences of research rule violations and the importance of addressing them through structured remediation.

Financial Problems That Cannot Be Resolved Within the Program

When a program faces a budget shortfall that cannot be resolved through internal reallocation, the director should escalate to institutional leadership. This may involve requesting a budget revision from the funder, seeking bridge funding from the institution, or reducing program scope. The director should not attempt to hide financial problems or to continue spending without a plan.

Personnel Issues That Threaten the Program

When personnel problems escalate beyond the director's ability to resolve them, the director should involve human resources or institutional leadership. This includes situations involving harassment, discrimination, threats, or serious misconduct. The director should document the situation and follow institutional policies for escalation.

Changes in Regulatory Requirements

When regulatory requirements change in ways that affect the program, the director should escalate to institutional compliance offices and may need to notify funders. The director should also update training and standard operating procedures to reflect the new requirements.

Scientific Misconduct Allegations

Allegations of scientific misconduct, including fabrication, falsification, or plagiarism, must be escalated to the institutional research integrity office. The director should not attempt to investigate or resolve such allegations independently. The institution has established procedures for handling misconduct allegations, and the director should follow those procedures.

Limitations and Realistic Expectations

Research program director roles carry significant responsibility and are not suitable for every researcher. The role requires a combination of scientific expertise, administrative skill, and interpersonal judgment that takes years to develop. Directors are accountable for outcomes that depend on the work of many people, and they must be comfortable with that distributed accountability.

The role also involves tradeoffs. Directors spend less time at the bench or in the clinic than they did as early-career researchers. They attend more meetings, review more documents, and manage more people. Some researchers find this shift rewarding, others find it frustrating. Candidates should assess their own preferences before pursuing a director role.

The career path to research program director is not linear. Many directors move between institutions, take on progressively larger programs, and develop their skills through a combination of formal training and on-the-job experience. The Office of Intramural Training and Education at the National Institutes of Health provides resources for researchers at all career stages who want to develop leadership skills. The O*NET OnLine database can help job seekers understand the skills and knowledge that research leadership occupations require.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the difference between a research program director and a research program manager?

A research program director holds authority over scientific direction, compliance, and budget accountability, while a research program manager handles operational coordination, scheduling, and communication. The director makes decisions about research priorities and resource allocation, while the manager ensures that the program runs on schedule and that information flows correctly. The two roles are complementary, and a program manager role can be an entry point into research administration, but moving to a director role requires demonstrating scientific judgment, regulatory knowledge, and leadership experience.

What education is required for research program director jobs?

Most research program director roles require a doctoral degree in a relevant field plus a record of research productivity. The U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics Life, Physical, and Social Science Occupations page confirms that most life and physical science occupations require advanced education. Some director roles, particularly those focused on research administration instead of scientific leadership, may accept a master's degree with substantial experience. Job descriptions vary widely across institutions, so candidates should read each posting carefully.

What skills do hiring committees evaluate for research program director positions?

Hiring committees evaluate scientific expertise, regulatory and compliance knowledge, financial and administrative skills, leadership and communication ability, and data and technology literacy. They look for evidence of performance in research and administration, as well as leadership behavior and professional networks. A study of factors affecting employee careers found that performance has the strongest direct influence on career advancement Influence of Competence, Transformational Leadership, Social Capital and Performance on Employee Careers.

How do I find research program director jobs?

Research program director jobs are posted through university job boards, professional society career centers, and general job search platforms. Because job titles vary widely across institutions, as documented in a study of program coordinator job descriptions An Analysis of Graduate Medical Education Program Coordinator Job Descriptions, job seekers should search using multiple title variations. The O*NET OnLine database can help job seekers understand the occupational classification of research leadership roles.

What records should a research program director maintain?

Directors should maintain compliance records, financial records, personnel records, scientific records, and program metrics. These records support reporting to funders, provide evidence for performance reviews, and help directors identify problems before they become crises. Directors should establish regular review cycles for each record type and should use records to make decisions, also to document activity.

What are the most common failure patterns in research program direction?

The most common failure patterns are compliance failures, scope creep and mission drift, communication breakdowns, personnel problems, and financial mismanagement. Compliance failures are the most serious because they can cause significant problems for human participants, animal subjects, data integrity, institutions, and investigators The Professionalism and Integrity in Research Program: Description and Preliminary Outcomes. Directors should treat compliance as a continuous responsibility.

How do I transition from a clinical or technical role to a research program director role?

Professionals transitioning from clinical or technical roles should seek formal mentorship and orientation programs instead of assuming they will learn the academic side of the role on their own. A study of Certified Registered Nurse Anesthetists transitioning to academia found that these professionals often lack formal mentorship and accessible resources during the transition A Qualitative Descriptive Study on the CRNA Transition to Academia. Early teaching opportunities and professional connections can provide entry points into academic roles.

What are the career advancement opportunities for research program directors?

Research program directors can advance to leadership roles with larger scope, including center directors, associate deans for research, and institutional research leadership positions. Advancement depends on demonstrated performance, leadership behavior, and professional networks. The Office of Intramural Training and Education at the National Institutes of Health provides resources for researchers who want to develop the skills needed for advanced leadership roles.

Related Articles

• Bioinformatics Career Path: Roles, Skills, and Progression From Beginner to Research Lead
• Bioinformatics Career Path: Roles, Skills, and Progression From Beginner to Research Lead
• Biotech Research Jobs
• Biotech Research Jobs
• biology research jobs

References and Further Reading

• Life, Physical, and Social Science Occupations. U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics.
• Healthcare Occupations. U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics.
• O*NET OnLine. U.S. Department of Labor.
• Office of Intramural Training and Education. National Institutes of Health.
• NCBI Literature Resources. National Center for Biotechnology Information.
• PubMed. National Library of Medicine.
• UEFA expert group statement on nutrition in elite football. Current evidence to inform practical recommendations and guide future research.. British journal of sports medicine, 2021.
• The Professionalism and Integrity in Research Program: Description and Preliminary Outcomes.. Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges, 2018.
• The function of a medical director in healthcare institutions: a master or a servant.. Health services insights, 2013.
• Pediatric Program Leadership's Contribution Toward Resident Wellness.. Academic pediatrics, 2018.
• Cuddler Program provides soothing answers.. Neonatal network : NN, 1990.
• Structured Mentorship and the Nursing Clinical Ladder.. Clinical nurse specialist CNS, 2020.
• Evaluation of otolaryngology residency program websites.. JAMA otolaryngology-- head & neck surgery, 2014.
• An Analysis of Graduate Medical Education Program Coordinator Job Descriptions.. Journal of graduate medical education, 2026.
• Advancing data-driven health research from the &lt,i&gt,All of Us&lt,/i&gt, data training and engagement program.. 2026.
• A Qualitative Descriptive Study on the CRNA Transition to Academia.. 2026.
• Prevalence, Structure and Barriers of Academic Pharmacy Fellowships: A Survey of Program Directors.. 2026.
• Methods and Sample Representativeness of the Fall 2025 CERA Program Director Survey.. 2026.
• Building Clinical Nursing Research Capacity: A Scalable Multi-Institutional Fellowship Model.. 2026.
• Gender-Based Challenges in Women's Leadership Careers: A Literature Synthesis. Technium Social Sciences Journal, 2024.
• Pathways to research leadership for early career researchers in Africa: A potential role for African and Global Funders. South African Journal of Higher Education, 2022.
• Barriers of West African women scientists in their research and academic careers: A qualitative research. PLoS ONE, 2022.
• INFLUENCE OF COMPETENCE, TRANSFORMATIONAL LEADERSHIP, SOCIAL CAPITAL AND PERFORMANCE ON EMPLOYEE CAREERS. 2017.
• A Summary Report from the Research Partnership on Women in Science Careers. Journal of general internal medicine, 2018.
• Making the Match: Three Program Directors’ Thoughts on Successfully Matching into Pediatric Cardiology Fellowship. Pediatric Cardiology, 2021.
• Defining the roles and responsibilities of the kidney transplant medical director: A necessary step for future training, mentoring, and professional development. American Journal of Transplantation, 2021.

This article is educational and does not replace institutional policy, professional advice, or applicable safety and regulatory requirements.