Core Facility Careers: Navigating Scientist and Staff Roles in Academic Research

Core facilities are centralized research service units within universities, medical schools, and research institutes that provide access to specialized instruments, technologies, and expertise. For scientists and technical staff, these units offer an alternative career path to the traditional tenure-track faculty model. This article explains the different roles available in core facilities, the skills required for each position, how career progression works, and the practical considerations for entering or advancing within this sector of academic research.

What Defines a Core Facility Career

A core facility career involves working in a shared research resource that serves multiple laboratories or departments. These facilities typically provide access to expensive instrumentation, specialized technical expertise, or data analysis services that individual laboratories cannot justify purchasing or maintaining independently. Common examples include genomics cores, imaging facilities, flow cytometry units, proteomics laboratories, bioinformatics groups, and animal research facilities.

The career structure in core facilities differs from traditional academic paths. Principal investigators in academic laboratories focus on securing grants, training students, and publishing original research. Core facility staff focus on providing reliable services, maintaining equipment, developing new methods, and supporting the research of other scientists. This distinction shapes the performance metrics, advancement criteria, and daily work patterns for core facility professionals.

The Office of Intramural Training and Education at the National Institutes of Health provides career development resources that are relevant for scientists considering roles in shared research facilities. The U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics Life, Physical, and Social Science Occupations page offers general information about science careers, while the Healthcare Occupations page covers related roles in clinical and biomedical settings. The O*NET OnLine database from the U.S. Department of Labor provides detailed information about job tasks, skills, and work contexts for specific occupations.

The Scientist Role in Core Facilities

Core facility scientists, sometimes called staff scientists or research scientists, are responsible for the technical direction and scientific quality of the facility. They develop new methods, troubleshoot complex problems, train users, and ensure that the data produced by the facility meets rigorous standards. Unlike faculty members who primarily pursue their own research questions, core scientists apply their expertise to support a broad range of research projects from many different laboratories.

The role of imaging scientists in core facilities illustrates the broader challenges facing core facility professionals. According to a 2024 publication in the Journal of Microscopy, imaging core facilities are vital hubs that drive collaboration and innovation at the technology development and dissemination frontier. The authors note that challenges persist in recognizing the value of imaging scientists, aligning performance metrics, and providing avenues for career progression and job security. The mismatch between classic academic career paths and service-oriented roles creates a lack of understanding regarding the value and impact of these professionals and how to evaluate them properly. These recommendations apply equally to colleagues working in other core facilities and research institutions through which access to technologies is facilitated and supported. See the full publication on PubMed.

Core scientists must maintain deep technical expertise in their specialty area while also developing skills in customer service, project management, and sometimes budgeting. They need to understand the research goals of their users well enough to recommend appropriate experimental approaches. They also need to stay current with technological developments in their field, which requires continuous learning and often attendance at conferences and training workshops.

The Staff Role in Core Facilities

Core facility staff include technicians, research specialists, and operations personnel who handle the day-to-day work of running the facility. These roles involve sample preparation, instrument operation, routine maintenance, quality control testing, and data collection. Staff positions may also include administrative responsibilities such as scheduling, billing, and inventory management.

The distinction between scientist and staff roles is not always clear-cut. In smaller facilities, a single person may perform both scientific and operational duties. In larger facilities, there is typically a hierarchy that includes a director, one or more scientists, senior technicians, and entry-level technicians. The specific responsibilities and qualifications for each level vary by institution and by the type of facility.

A 2025 study in F1000Research examined the views of research infrastructure staff on career path diversity in Sweden. The authors found a strong need for clarity and communication about planning and implementation of career path structures at universities. While workshop participants reported continuous development of their technical and service skills, the lack of recognition of this expertise presented a barrier to a sustainable career. The study concluded that there is a need to continue advocating for increased clarity and diversity in career paths for staff scientists. See the full study on PubMed.

At a Glance: Core Facility Role Comparison

The following table compares the primary roles found in academic core facilities. Specific qualifications and salary ranges vary by institution, geographic region, and funding source.

Skills Required for Core Facility Careers

Core facility work demands a combination of technical, interpersonal, and administrative skills that differs from what is typically emphasized in graduate training. Scientists entering this field often need to develop capabilities that were not part of their doctoral or postdoctoral education.

Technical Proficiency

Deep technical knowledge in the facility's specialty area is the foundation of a core facility career. This includes understanding the underlying principles of the technology, being able to operate instruments correctly, and knowing how to optimize protocols for different sample types and research questions. For example, a scientist in an imaging core needs to understand optics, fluorophore chemistry, sample preparation, and image analysis. A scientist in a genomics core needs to understand library preparation, sequencing chemistry, and bioinformatics pipelines.

The NEUBIAS training program for bioimage analysts provides a model for how specialized technical skills can be developed through structured education. According to a 2021 publication in F1000Research, NEUBIAS was created in 2016 with the goal of improving communication and knowledge transfer among stakeholders involved in the acquisition, processing, and analysis of biological image data. The program's training schools trained over 400 new bioimage analysts from over 40 countries. The curriculum used a three-level program structure and contributed to the establishment and recognition of the profession of Bioimage Analyst. See the full publication on PubMed.

Service Orientation

Core facilities exist to serve the research community. This means that staff must be responsive to user needs, communicate clearly about capabilities and limitations, and deliver results on agreed timelines. Unlike academic research where the scientist controls the research question, core facility work requires adapting to the priorities and preferences of many different users.

A core facility voucher program at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine illustrates how core facilities engage with their user community. According to a 2025 publication in the Journal of Biomolecular Techniques, the program requires a core consultation to ensure all proposals meet core facility standards for rigor and reproducibility. The program is accessible to trainees and provides opportunities for researchers to collaborate with core facilities while also allowing core directors to develop new pipelines and bring new services into their portfolio. See the full publication on Semantic Scholar.

Data Management and Reproducibility

Core facilities generate large amounts of data that must be organized, documented, and delivered to users in usable formats. This requires attention to data standards, file naming conventions, metadata documentation, and quality control procedures. Many facilities are also developing data management plans that address storage, backup, and long-term preservation.

The NCBI Literature Resources and PubMed databases are essential tools for core facility staff who need to stay current with methods and best practices in their field. Searching the literature is a routine part of method development, troubleshooting, and quality assurance in core facilities.

Communication and Training

Core facility staff spend a significant portion of their time communicating with users. This includes initial consultations to understand research needs, training sessions to teach instrument operation, and ongoing support to help users troubleshoot problems. Effective communication requires translating technical concepts for audiences with varying levels of expertise.

Training is a core function of many facilities. The NEUBIAS experience demonstrates that structured training programs can have a significant impact on the community. The training schools brought the latest innovations into structured, frequent, and intensive training activities, and the authors suggest this should become a model to further develop in life sciences. See the full publication on PubMed.

Career Paths and Advancement

Career advancement in core facilities follows different pathways than traditional academic careers. Understanding these pathways is essential for scientists and staff who want to build sustainable careers in this sector.

The Staff Scientist Track

The staff scientist track provides a career path for scientists who want to remain in research without pursuing a faculty position. These positions typically involve increasing responsibility for method development, collaboration, and scientific leadership within the facility. Senior staff scientists may lead their own service areas, supervise junior staff, and contribute to the scientific direction of the facility.

The challenges facing staff scientists are well documented. The 2025 Swedish study found that infrastructure staff ranked Sweden as a stable and attractive place to work and reported continuous development of their technical and service skills. However, the lack of recognition of this expertise presented a barrier to a sustainable career. The authors concluded that there is a need to continue advocating for increased clarity and diversity in career paths for staff scientists. See the full study on PubMed.

The Management Track

Some core facility professionals advance into management roles. Facility managers oversee daily operations, including scheduling, billing, compliance, and staff coordination. Core directors have overall responsibility for the facility, including strategic planning, budget management, and relationships with institutional leadership. These roles require administrative skills that are often not taught in scientific training programs.

The transition from technical work to management requires a significant shift in focus. Managers must learn to delegate technical tasks, handle personnel issues, and balance competing priorities. They also need to understand institutional policies and funding models that affect core facility operations.

The Faculty Hybrid Model

Some core facility scientists hold faculty appointments. This hybrid model allows scientists to maintain an independent research program while also directing or staffing a core facility. The faculty appointment provides access to the academic promotion system, while the core facility role provides stable funding and access to specialized resources.

The transition from trainee to principal investigator involves challenges that are relevant to core facility careers. According to a 2026 Perspective published in Nature Reviews Bioengineering, early career investigators must rapidly develop skills in leadership, personnel management, infrastructure planning, and strategic funding development while simultaneously establishing their scientific identity. The authors note that doctoral and postdoctoral training programs provide extensive preparation in experimental design, data analysis, and scientific communication, but far less attention is devoted to the practical responsibilities associated with launching and managing an independent research laboratory. See the full publication on Europe PMC.

Professional Communities and Networking

Core facility professionals benefit from connecting with colleagues at other institutions who face similar challenges. Professional organizations and conferences provide opportunities for sharing best practices, learning about new technologies, and building collaborative relationships.

The Association of Biomolecular Resource Facilities (ABRF) is a major professional organization for core facility professionals. According to a 2026 meeting report, the ABRF annual meeting brought scientific core directors, core staff, institutional leadership, and industry partners together to discuss their challenges, goals, and successes in supporting and advancing Shared Research Resources. The meeting in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania attracted over 800 attendees. See the full report on Europe PMC.

Professional networking serves several purposes for core facility careers. It provides access to job opportunities, allows for benchmarking against peer institutions, and creates a community of practice for solving common problems. Many core facility professionals also participate in working groups and committees that develop standards and best practices for their field.

Training and Education Pathways

Entering a core facility career typically requires a combination of formal education and hands-on training. The specific requirements vary by role and by the technical complexity of the facility.

Graduate Education

Most core facility scientist positions require a graduate degree. A PhD is typically expected for scientist-level positions, particularly in facilities that support complex research such as genomics, imaging, or structural biology. A Master's degree may be sufficient for some scientist positions, particularly in facilities that focus on service instead of method development.

Graduate programs in the life sciences provide the foundation for core facility careers, but they do not typically provide training in the specific skills needed for facility work. Students who are interested in core facility careers should seek out opportunities to gain hands-on experience with specialized instrumentation, learn about quality management systems, and develop their teaching and communication skills.

Technical Training

Hands-on technical training is essential for core facility work. This training may come from instrument manufacturers, professional workshops, or on-the-job experience. Many facilities provide structured training programs for their staff, and some institutions offer formal certification programs for specific technologies.

The NEUBIAS training schools provide an example of how specialized technical training can be delivered at scale. The program trained over 400 new bioimage analysts from over 40 countries using a three-level curriculum. The training program played a key role in collectively leveraging bioimaging and life science research by bringing the latest innovations into structured, frequent, and intensive training activities. See the full publication on PubMed.

Continuing Education

Core facility professionals must engage in continuous learning to keep pace with technological developments. This may include attending conferences, participating in webinars, reading the scientific literature, and taking courses on new techniques. Many institutions provide professional development funding for core facility staff, and some require evidence of continuing education as part of the performance review process.

The Office of Intramural Training and Education at the National Institutes of Health offers a range of career development resources that are relevant for core facility professionals. These resources include workshops, courses, and career guidance materials.

Funding Models and Job Security

Core facility careers are shaped by the funding models that support these units. Understanding these models is essential for anyone considering a career in this sector.

Institutional Support

Many core facilities receive base funding from their institution. This funding may cover salaries for core staff, equipment maintenance, and operational costs. The level of institutional support varies widely, and some facilities are expected to recover most or all of their costs through user fees.

Institutional support provides stability for core facility staff, but it also creates accountability to institutional priorities. Facilities that receive significant institutional support may be expected to serve a broad range of users, maintain certain service levels, and align their operations with institutional strategic goals.

User Fees

Most core facilities charge fees for their services. These fees are typically set to recover the costs of consumables, equipment maintenance, and staff time. The fee structure must balance the need to cover costs with the need to keep services accessible to researchers.

The voucher program at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill provides an example of how institutions can incentivize use of core facilities. The program funds pilot projects that allow researchers to collaborate with core facilities, with the goal of producing scholarly output and developing new services. See the full publication on Semantic Scholar.

Grant Funding

Some core facilities supplement their base funding with grant support. This may include grants for equipment purchases, method development projects, or training programs. Grant funding can provide opportunities for career advancement, but it also introduces uncertainty because grants are time-limited.

Core facility staff who are interested in grant funding need to develop grant writing skills. This is an area where many scientists feel unprepared, as graduate training typically focuses on research skills instead of funding acquisition.

Common Challenges in Core Facility Careers

Core facility professionals face a range of challenges that are specific to their role. Understanding these challenges can help scientists and staff make informed decisions about their careers.

Recognition and Evaluation

A recurring challenge in core facility careers is the difficulty of evaluating performance using traditional academic metrics. Core facility staff contribute to many publications, but they are often not listed as corresponding authors. Their work is essential to the research enterprise, but it may not be visible in the same way as faculty research.

The 2024 Journal of Microscopy publication highlights this challenge. The authors note that there is a mismatch between classic academic career paths and service-oriented roles, resulting in a lack of understanding regarding the value and impact of imaging scientists and core facilities and how to evaluate them properly. See the full publication on PubMed.

Career Progression

Career progression in core facilities is often less structured than in traditional academic careers. There may be limited opportunities for promotion, and the criteria for advancement may be unclear. This can be particularly challenging for staff who want to move from technician roles to scientist roles or from scientist roles to leadership positions.

The 2025 Swedish study found that there is a strong need for clarity and communication about planning and implementation of career path structures at universities. The lack of recognition of staff expertise presents a barrier to a sustainable career. See the full study on PubMed.

Workload and Sustainability

Core facility staff often manage heavy workloads because they serve many different users with competing priorities. This can lead to stress and burnout, particularly in facilities that are understaffed or underfunded. Sustainability is a concern for both individual careers and for the core facility enterprise as a whole.

The 2024 Journal of Microscopy publication identifies sustainability as a key challenge for core facilities. The authors note challenges around sustainability, dedicated training opportunities, and the recruitment and retention of talent. See the full publication on PubMed.

Practical Steps for Entering Core Facility Careers

For scientists and students who are interested in core facility careers, there are several practical steps that can help build the necessary skills and experience.

Gain Hands-On Experience

Seek out opportunities to work with specialized instrumentation and technologies. This may involve taking courses that include laboratory components, volunteering in a core facility, or pursuing a rotation in a core facility during graduate training. Hands-on experience is the most direct way to build the technical skills needed for core facility work.

Develop Service Skills

Core facility work requires a service orientation that is different from the competitive, independent approach that is often encouraged in academic research. Look for opportunities to help others with their research, whether through teaching, mentoring, or providing technical support. These experiences can help develop the communication and collaboration skills that are essential for core facility careers.

Build a Professional Network

Connect with core facility professionals at your institution and at professional conferences. The ABRF annual meeting is a key event for the core facility community. Professional connections can provide mentorship, job leads, and insights into the field.

Learn About Funding and Operations

Understanding how core facilities are funded and managed is essential for career advancement. Look for opportunities to learn about budgeting, fee setting, and institutional policies. This knowledge will be valuable whether you are working as a technician or aiming for a director position.

Observations and Measurements for Career Planning

When considering a core facility career, it is useful to gather information about the specific roles and institutions you are considering. The following observations can help inform your decision.

Institutional Context

Research the institutional context for core facilities at the institutions you are considering. Look for information about how many core facilities exist, how they are funded, and what career paths are available for their staff. Institutions that have established career ladders for core facility staff are likely to offer better long-term prospects.

Role Requirements

Review job postings for core facility positions to understand the qualifications and skills that employers are looking for. Pay attention to the education requirements, technical skills, and experience levels specified in job descriptions. This information can help you identify gaps in your own qualifications.

Professional Community

Assess the strength of the professional community for core facility staff at the institution. Look for evidence of professional development opportunities, recognition programs, and staff representation in institutional governance. A strong professional community is a good indicator of institutional commitment to core facility careers.

Common Failure Patterns in Core Facility Careers

Understanding common failure patterns can help scientists and staff avoid pitfalls in their core facility careers.

Lack of Technical Currency

Core facility technologies evolve rapidly. Staff who fail to stay current with new methods and technologies may find their skills becoming obsolete. This can limit career advancement and reduce the value of the facility to its users.

Poor Communication with Users

Core facilities depend on positive relationships with their users. Staff who communicate poorly, miss deadlines, or fail to understand user needs can damage the facility's reputation and reduce demand for its services. This can have direct consequences for the facility's funding and for individual careers.

Inability to Balance Service and Science

Core facility work requires a balance between providing reliable services and advancing scientific methods. Staff who focus too heavily on service may find their scientific skills stagnating. Staff who focus too heavily on method development may neglect their service responsibilities. Finding the right balance is essential for long-term career success.

Failure to Document Work

Core facilities generate large amounts of data and documentation. Staff who fail to maintain proper records may create problems for themselves and for the facility. Good documentation practices are essential for quality control, reproducibility, and legal compliance.

Professional Escalation Criteria

Core facility professionals should know when to escalate concerns to supervisors or institutional leadership. The following situations warrant escalation.

Equipment Failures

If an instrument is malfunctioning and the problem cannot be resolved through routine troubleshooting, escalate the issue to the facility director or the appropriate institutional office. Equipment failures can affect multiple users and may require professional service or replacement.

Safety Concerns

If you observe a safety hazard in the facility, report it immediately to the facility director and the institutional safety office. Do not attempt to resolve serious safety issues on your own. Safety concerns may include chemical exposures, biological hazards, radiation risks, or physical hazards.

User Conflicts

If you are unable to resolve a conflict with a user, escalate the issue to the facility director. Conflicts may involve disagreements about experimental design, data interpretation, or resource allocation. Early escalation can prevent small problems from becoming larger ones.

Ethical Concerns

If you observe research misconduct, data fabrication, or other ethical violations, report your concerns through the appropriate institutional channels. Many institutions have specific procedures for reporting research misconduct, and core facility staff have a responsibility to maintain the integrity of the research enterprise.

Safety and Regulatory Context

Core facilities operate within a complex regulatory environment. Staff must be aware of the regulations that apply to their specific facility and must maintain compliance with institutional policies and legal requirements.

Laboratory Safety

Core facilities typically handle hazardous materials, including chemicals, biological agents, and radioactive substances. Staff must be trained in laboratory safety procedures and must follow institutional safety policies. This includes proper use of personal protective equipment, safe handling of hazardous materials, and proper waste disposal.

Research Compliance

Core facilities that support research involving human subjects, animals, or controlled substances must comply with the relevant regulations. This may include institutional review board approval for human subjects research, institutional animal care and use committee approval for animal research, and Drug Enforcement Administration regulations for controlled substances.

Data Integrity

Core facilities have a responsibility to maintain the integrity of the data they produce. This includes following proper quality control procedures, maintaining accurate records, and ensuring that data are not falsified or fabricated. The NCBI Literature Resources and PubMed databases provide access to publications on research integrity and best practices.

The Future of Core Facility Careers

The core facility enterprise is evolving in response to changes in technology, funding, and research practices. Understanding these trends can help scientists and staff make informed decisions about their careers.

Increasing Specialization

As research technologies become more complex, core facilities are becoming more specialized. This creates opportunities for staff who develop deep expertise in specific technologies, but it also means that staff may need to change specialties as technologies evolve.

Growing Importance of Data Science

Data analysis is becoming an increasingly important part of core facility services. Facilities that support genomics, imaging, and other data-intensive technologies need staff with computational skills. This creates opportunities for scientists with backgrounds in bioinformatics, computer science, and statistics.

Emphasis on Reproducibility

The scientific community is placing increasing emphasis on research reproducibility. Core facilities have an important role to play in this effort by maintaining rigorous quality control procedures and documenting their methods carefully. Staff who develop expertise in reproducibility practices may find themselves in high demand.

New Funding Models

Core facilities are exploring new funding models to ensure their sustainability. These may include voucher programs, membership models, and partnerships with industry. Staff who understand these funding models and can contribute to the financial sustainability of their facility will be valuable assets.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the difference between a core facility scientist and a research scientist in a traditional laboratory?

A core facility scientist provides technical services and expertise to many different research groups, while a research scientist in a traditional laboratory typically works on a single research program. Core facility scientists focus on method development, quality control, and user support. Research scientists in traditional laboratories focus on their own research questions and publications. The performance metrics for these roles differ, with core facility scientists being evaluated on service quality and user satisfaction while traditional research scientists are evaluated on publications and grant funding.

What education is required for a core facility career?

The education requirements vary by role. Technician positions typically require a Bachelor's degree in a relevant field. Scientist positions typically require a PhD or a Master's degree with significant experience. Director positions usually require a PhD and substantial experience in core facility operations. Some specialized roles, such as bioimage analysts, may require graduate training in quantitative fields. The O*NET OnLine database provides detailed information about education requirements for specific occupations.

How does career advancement work in core facilities?

Career advancement in core facilities follows several pathways. Staff may advance from technician to senior technician to specialist. Scientists may advance from staff scientist to senior scientist to director. Some core facility professionals hold faculty appointments and advance through the academic promotion system. The availability of advancement opportunities varies by institution, and some institutions have more structured career ladders than others. The 2025 Swedish study found that clarity and communication about career path structures are important for staff satisfaction. See the full study on PubMed.

What skills are most important for core facility work?

The most important skills for core facility work include technical proficiency in the facility's specialty area, communication skills for interacting with users, attention to detail for quality control, and organizational skills for managing multiple projects. Data management skills are increasingly important as core facilities generate large amounts of data. Service orientation is essential because core facilities exist to support the research of others.

How do core facility salaries compare to other research careers?

Salary information for core facility positions is available from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics Life, Physical, and Social Science Occupations page and the Healthcare Occupations page. Salaries vary by role, institution, and geographic region. Core facility salaries are generally competitive with other research positions, though they may be lower than salaries in industry. The O*NET OnLine database also provides wage information for specific occupations.

What are the main challenges of working in a core facility?

The main challenges of core facility work include the lack of recognition compared to traditional academic roles, limited career advancement opportunities, heavy workloads, and the need to balance service and scientific responsibilities. The 2024 Journal of Microscopy publication identifies challenges around recognition, performance metrics, career progression, job security, sustainability, training opportunities, and recruitment and retention of talent. See the full publication on PubMed.

How can I gain experience for a core facility career?

You can gain experience for a core facility career by seeking hands-on training with specialized instrumentation, volunteering or rotating in a core facility, taking courses that include laboratory components, and developing your communication and teaching skills. Professional organizations such as the Association of Biomolecular Resource Facilities provide networking and professional development opportunities.

What professional organizations support core facility careers?

The Association of Biomolecular Resource Facilities (ABRF) is the primary professional organization for core facility professionals. The ABRF annual meeting brings together core directors, core staff, institutional leadership, and industry partners. See the 2026 meeting report on Europe PMC. Other organizations may support specific types of core facilities, such as imaging or genomics. The Office of Intramural Training and Education at the National Institutes of Health provides career development resources that are relevant for core facility professionals.

Related Articles

• Research Scientist Careers in Biotechnology
• Genomics Careers: Roles Beyond the Sequencing Lab
• Bioinformatics Career Path: Roles, Skills, and Progression From Beginner to Research Lead
• Bioinformatics Career Path: Roles, Skills, and Progression From Beginner to Research Lead
• Research Technician

References and Further Reading

• Life, Physical, and Social Science Occupations. U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics.
• Healthcare Occupations. U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics.
• O*NET OnLine. U.S. Department of Labor.
• Office of Intramural Training and Education. National Institutes of Health.
• NCBI Literature Resources. National Center for Biotechnology Information.
• PubMed. National Library of Medicine.
• Recognising the importance and impact of Imaging Scientists: Global guidelines for establishing career paths within core facilities.. Journal of microscopy, 2024.
• Highlights from the 2016-2020 NEUBIAS training schools for Bioimage Analysts: a success story and key asset for analysts and life scientists.. F1000Research, 2021.
• From Recruitment to Retirement: Research Infrastructure Staff Views on the Diversification of Scientific Career Paths at Universities in Sweden in 2024.. F1000Research, 2025.
• ABRF 2026 Meeting Report.. 2026.
• Launching an independent research laboratory in a digital era: practical lessons for early career investigators.. 2026.
• Exploring diverse applications of team-based care in preventive medicine: a scoping review.. 2026.
• A system-wide snapshot: A multi-campus survey of open source contributors at the University of California.. 2026.
• Organizational Justice and Health Equity in Rural Japan: A Case-Based Analysis of a Hybrid Community-Hospital Organization.. 2026.
• National Public Health Institutes in Africa, 2010-2025: pathways, governance, and outcomes, a scoping review.. 2026.
• Lessons learned from three approaches to digital pathology system validation at a large academic medical institution.. 2026.
• Barriers and facilitators for the implementation of Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs in Dar es Salaam Regional Referral Hospitals (RRHs).. 2026.
• New direction to informatization of construction projects--virtual design and construction. 2008.
• Incentivizing Collaboration with Core Facilities: Developing an Impactful Core Facility Voucher Program at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine.. Journal of Biomolecular Techniques, 2025.
• Computational Biology Service Unit: Cornell University Core Facility for Computational Biology. 2010.
• The EV Core Facility Marburg: Advancing the frontier of extracellular vesicles research. Trillium Extracellular Vesicles, 2024.
• Getting to the Core of Services: Considering the Arizona State University Library as a Core Facility. portal: Libraries and the Academy, 2019.

This article is educational and does not replace institutional policy, professional advice, or applicable safety and regulatory requirements.