Primate Behavioral Ecology: How Social Systems and Environment Shape Primate Life

Primate behavioral ecology examines how ecological factors such as food distribution, predation risk, and habitat structure shape primate social systems, mating strategies, and cognitive evolution. This field integrates observational data from wild populations with comparative anatomical and experimental studies to explain why primate species differ in group size, social organization, and behavioral flexibility. For students, researchers, and life-science professionals, understanding these relationships provides a framework for analyzing primate social systems based on measurable ecological variables instead of assuming social behavior arises independently of environmental context.

The Socioecological Framework

The socioecological framework posits that ecological conditions, particularly the distribution and quality of food resources, set the parameters within which primate social systems evolve. When food resources are clumped and defensible, competition among females intensifies, favoring larger groups with clear dominance hierarchies. When resources are dispersed and unpredictable, females may benefit from smaller groups or solitary foraging strategies that reduce feeding competition.

Predation risk operates alongside feeding ecology as a primary selective force. Species living in habitats with high predator density tend to form larger groups because group living provides dilution effects and increased vigilance. The relationship between predation pressure and group size has been documented across multiple primate lineages, though the strength of this effect varies with habitat type and predator community composition.

The framework also accounts for phylogenetic constraints. Closely related species often share social traits because of common ancestry, even when they occupy different ecological niches. Researchers must therefore compare social systems across multiple independent lineages to distinguish ecological adaptation from phylogenetic inertia. This comparative approach forms the methodological backbone of primate socioecology and appears throughout the foundational literature on primate behavioral ecology, including the fifth edition of Karen Strier's comprehensive textbook on the subject [21].

Food Distribution and Social Organization

Resource Defensibility and Female Relationships

Female primates invest more heavily in offspring than males and therefore face stronger selection to secure adequate nutrition. When high-quality food occurs in patches large enough to support multiple individuals but small enough to be monopolized, females benefit from forming coalitions with relatives to defend those patches. This pattern predicts the matrilineal dominance hierarchies observed in many cercopithecine monkeys, including macaques and baboons.

When food is evenly distributed or occurs in patches too large to defend, female bonding becomes less advantageous. Species such as chimpanzees and orangutans, which feed on ripe fruit scattered across large home ranges, show weaker female bonding and more fluid association patterns. The relationship between food distribution and female social relationships represents one of the most consistent findings in primate socioecology.

Dietary Diversity and Feeding Strategies

Primates display remarkable dietary plasticity, adapting their feeding behavior to seasonal changes in food availability. Species with broad dietary spectra can switch between fruits, leaves, insects, and other resources as availability shifts. This flexibility buffers them against food scarcity and allows them to occupy seasonal habitats.

Feeding rate, defined as the number of food items consumed per unit time, provides valuable information about foraging efficiency and patch quality. Researchers measure feeding rates to assess whether primates are meeting their energetic requirements and to compare habitat quality across sites. Studies of primate feeding ecology increasingly integrate feeding rate data with nutritional analysis and behavioral observation to build comprehensive models of energy acquisition [16].

An integrative approach to primate feeding ecology combines data on food availability, nutrient composition, feeding behavior, and digestive physiology. This approach recognizes that primates make foraging decisions based on multiple criteria, including energy content, protein-to-fiber ratios, toxin levels, and handling costs. Field studies that measure these variables simultaneously provide the most accurate picture of how ecological conditions shape feeding strategies [17].

Case Study: Sympatric Macaques and Langurs

The long-tailed macaque and dusky langur coexist in Malaysian forests despite overlapping diets. Macaques are generalist omnivores that consume fruits, insects, and small vertebrates, while langurs are more folivorous, relying heavily on leaves. Their dietary overlap varies seasonally, with competition intensifying when fruit is scarce and both species shift toward shared fallback foods.

This sympatric relationship demonstrates how behavioral flexibility allows closely related species to partition resources. Macaques use their manual dexterity and cognitive abilities to exploit hidden or protected foods, while langurs rely on their specialized digestive systems to process fibrous leaves. The coexistence of these species illustrates the ecological mechanisms that maintain primate diversity in tropical forests [20].

Predation Risk and Spatial Organization

Predation risk fundamentally shapes primate social structure by influencing cooperation, competition, and spatial organization within groups. The presence of predators affects group size and how individuals position themselves relative to group members during foraging, traveling, and resting.

Research on mantled howler monkeys in Mexico examined how domestic dogs influence interindividual proximity among group members. Dogs represent one of the world's most impactful invasive species affecting wildlife, yet their influence on primate social structure remains understudied. Researchers studied two habituated groups combining 242 hours of observational data with experimental playbacks of dog barks at different intensities. Howler monkeys were closer immediately following exposure to dogs, partially supporting the hypothesis that interindividual proximity would change in response to dogs. However, individuals were farther from each other as bark intensity increased and as proximity to dog stimuli decreased. During longer timeframes, individuals were closer when exposed to low-intensity barks compared to periods without dog stimuli [11].

These findings demonstrate that dogs influence howler monkey spatial organization through context-dependent effects that vary with stimulus characteristics and temporal scale. The consistency between observational and experimental results suggests these patterns are reliable. This research contributes to understanding how invasive predators affect primate social structure and highlights the importance of managing free-ranging dogs in areas where they overlap with wildlife populations [11].

Mating Strategies and Reproductive Competition

Male Reproductive Strategies

Mating strategies in primates reflect the interaction between ecological conditions and social organization. In species where females are spatially dispersed, males cannot monopolize access to multiple females and instead compete through sperm competition or mate guarding. In species where females cluster around defensible resources, males can monopolize groups and compete through direct contests.

The operational sex ratio, determined by the number of reproductively available males and females, influences the intensity of male-male competition. When females synchronize their estrous cycles, males face reduced opportunities to monopolize mating and may adopt alternative strategies such as forming coalitions or investing in courtship.

Female Choice and Sexual Selection

Female primates exercise choice through selective mating with preferred males, which may confer genetic benefits or direct benefits such as protection or food access. Female choice can drive the evolution of male traits including body size, canine length, and vocalizations.

Female reproductive strategies also include mate choice across multiple cycles, extra-group mating, and post-copulatory mechanisms that bias paternity. These strategies allow females to optimize offspring quality while managing the costs of male harassment and infanticide risk.

Cognitive Evolution and the Ecological Brain

The Ecological Brain Hypothesis

The Ecological Brain hypothesis proposes that feeding ecology has driven the expansion of the brain to support the corresponding development of cognitive skills. Primates living in complex and seasonal environments rely upon cognitive capacities such as decision-making and episodic memory, which enable them to plan their daily foraging path.

Research examining the ventromedial prefrontal cortex (VMPFC) in five primate species found that all cerebral measures were more strongly related to feeding ecology than group size, a proxy for social complexity. The VMPFC volume is more precisely related to feeding ecology than the whole brain and appears to be critically related to dietary quality. This finding supports the hypothesis that the VMPFC would be greater in primates with a large dietary spectrum and complex foraging strategies [18].

Foraging Complexity and Brain Size

Primates that exploit diverse diets requiring extractive foraging techniques, such as cracking nuts or processing embedded insects, tend to have larger brains relative to body size. These foraging challenges require spatial memory, causal understanding, and behavioral flexibility.

The relationship between feeding ecology and brain evolution does not exclude social influences on cognition. Ecological and social factors likely interact, with ecological challenges creating the foundation for cognitive abilities that are then elaborated through social demands. Comparative studies that measure both ecological and social variables simultaneously provide the most complete picture of cognitive evolution.

Vocal Communication and Social Learning

Vocal accommodation is the process by which individuals adjust their vocalizations to resemble those of social partners. This phenomenon is widespread in social animals and can reinforce affiliation, signal group identity, and facilitate coordination. Most studies of vocal accommodation have focused on convergence in the acoustic structure of individual calls, but whether social partners also converge in how calls are arranged into sequences remained largely unknown.

Research on common marmosets examined vocal convergence during pair formation by recording phee sequences from nine dyads before pairing and again four months after. Researchers found vocal convergence on a sequence level. After pair formation, partners became more similar in sequence structure when calling to strangers, whereas no change was detected in partner-directed sequences. In contrast, call acoustic structure did not change in either context. Because vocal repertoires are constrained by anatomy and physiology, reorganizing existing call types into different combinations may provide a flexible route for modifying signals without altering the acoustic structure of individual calls. These results provide evidence that social bonds can drive sequence-level vocal convergence in a non-human primate, suggesting that vocal flexibility may arise through changes in sequence organization [12].

Cooperation and Social Tolerance

The Interdependency Hypothesis

Cooperation is often linked to enhanced tolerance and egalitarianism, yet evidence of profuse cooperation in less tolerant and despotic societies challenges this view. The overarching interdependency hypothesis posits that group-level interdependencies, such as strength in numbers or allomaternal care, promote indiscriminate cooperation through enhanced tolerance. This hypothesis also predicts that dyadic interdependence, including friendships, nepotistic biases, or coalitions, selectively enhances tolerance, fostering discriminate cooperation in despotic species.

Research on six macaque species spanning a tolerance gradient revealed high dyadic cooperation in despotic societies, yet this cooperation is restricted to a few partners. Dyadic prosociality, kinship, and tolerance positively predict cooperation. Agent-based models demonstrate that despotic societies have fewer but more stable bonds and thus higher dyadic interdependencies than egalitarian societies. These results suggest that interdependencies facilitate the emergence and maintenance of cooperation [13].

Cooperation in Despotic Versus Egalitarian Societies

Despotic primate societies, characterized by steep dominance hierarchies and low social tolerance, nonetheless exhibit cooperation among specific partners. These cooperative relationships are typically restricted to kin or long-term allies and may function to buffer individuals against the costs of low social status.

Egalitarian societies, in contrast, show more diffuse cooperation across group members. The distribution of cooperation reflects the underlying social structure, with despotic species channeling cooperation through stable dyadic bonds and egalitarian species distributing cooperation more broadly.

Behavioral Plasticity and Learning

Reinforcement Learning and Behavioral Ecology

Behavioral ecologists traditionally use dynamic programming methods to study sequential, state-dependent decision problems. These methods successfully predict animal behavior in various contexts but depend on distinct assumptions. Reinforcement learning methods offer a complementary collection of tools that allow for the study of behavior in highly complex environments, which conventional dynamic programming methods do not feasibly address.

Reinforcement learning methods are well-suited to studying how biological mechanisms solve developmental and learning problems. Researchers can use them to study simple rules that perform well in complex environments or to investigate under what conditions natural selection favors fixed, non-plastic traits, cue-driven-switch plasticity, or developmental selection. If natural selection favors developmental selection, which includes learning from environmental feedback, predictions can be made about the design of reward systems [7].

Niche Construction and Behavioral Flexibility

Niche construction theory examines how environmental modification can change the selection pressures that organisms face. Formal models from niche construction theory contrast with human behavioral ecology models that predict behavior assuming people behave adaptively in their local setting. These approaches can be formally incorporated in a multi-inheritance framework for evolutionary research [6].

For primates, niche construction includes behaviors such as tool use, habitat modification, and social learning that alter the selective environment for subsequent generations. These behaviors can create feedback loops in which ecological conditions and behavioral strategies co-evolve.

At a Glance: Ecological Factors and Primate Social Outcomes

Research Methods in Primate Behavioral Ecology

Observational Methods

Behavioral observation forms the foundation of primate behavioral ecology. Researchers use focal animal sampling, scan sampling, and all-occurrence recording to quantify behavior systematically. These methods require clear behavioral definitions and inter-observer reliability testing to ensure data quality.

Instantaneous sampling of interindividual proximity provides measures of spatial organization and social cohesion. Researchers calculate proximity indices to assess how group members distribute themselves across space and how this distribution changes in response to ecological or social stimuli.

Experimental Approaches

Playback experiments allow researchers to test specific hypotheses about predator recognition, communication, and social relationships. By presenting controlled acoustic stimuli, researchers can measure behavioral responses while controlling for confounding variables.

Field experiments can also manipulate food availability or distribution to test predictions about foraging decisions and social competition. These experiments must be designed carefully to minimize disturbance to study subjects and to avoid altering natural behavior patterns.

Technological Advances

Recent technological developments have expanded the toolkit available to primate behavioral ecologists. Multi-animal tracking systems using deep learning frameworks can detect and track primates in the wild from video recordings. The PriMAT approach learns to detect and track primates and other objects of interest from labeled videos or single images using bounding boxes instead of keypoints. This approach significantly facilitates data annotation and robustness. Applied to Assamese macaques and redfronted lemurs in the wild, PriMAT achieved robust tracking results with only a few hundred frames labeled with bounding boxes. The lemur identification model showed an accuracy of 84% in predicting identities [15].

These tools allow researchers to collect continuous behavioral data over extended periods and across larger spatial scales than traditional observation methods. However, they require validation against ground-truth observations and careful consideration of ethical implications.

Case Studies Across Primate Lineages

Platyrrhine Behavioral Ecology

Patrícia Izar studies the behavioral ecology, plasticity, and cognition of Platyrrhine primates at the University of São Paulo. Platyrrhines, the New World monkeys, display remarkable diversity in social organization, ranging from solitary owl monkeys to large multi-male groups of muriquis. This diversity makes them valuable for testing socioecological predictions across independent evolutionary lineages [3].

Research on Platyrrhines has revealed that some species exhibit cognitive abilities comparable to those of Old World monkeys and apes, despite having diverged evolutionarily millions of years ago. These findings suggest that similar ecological pressures can produce convergent cognitive evolution.

Fossil Primate Feeding Ecology

Multiproxy approaches reconstruct fossil primate feeding behavior by combining stable isotope analysis, dental microwear, and buccal microtexture. A study of fossil macaques from the Plio-Pleistocene site Guefaït-4.2 in eastern Morocco used this approach to investigate feeding habits. Occlusal microwear results showed a pattern similar to extant African forest-dwelling species characterized by a durophagous diet based mainly on hard fruit and seed intake. Buccal microtexture results suggested the consumption of some grasses and the exploitation of more open habitats. Stable carbon isotopes indicated a C3-based diet without the presence of C4 plants typical of savanna grassland [19].

This multiproxy approach allows for dietary reconstruction covering a large part of the individual's life, providing insights into how fossil primates responded to environmental change.

Macaque Social Diversity

Macaques provide an opportunity for testing the interdependency hypothesis because they share similar social organization yet show remarkable variation in tolerance, hierarchy steepness, nepotistic biases, and coalitionary tendencies. This variation within a single genus allows researchers to isolate the effects of specific social and ecological variables while controlling for phylogenetic influences.

The six macaque species studied experimentally span a tolerance gradient from despotic species such as rhesus macaques to more tolerant species such as Tonkean macaques. This comparative approach reveals how subtle differences in social tolerance produce large differences in cooperation patterns [13].

Conservation Applications

Disease Ecology and Primate Conservation

Yellow fever remains a re-emerging vector-borne zoonotic disease in tropical regions of the Americas despite the availability of an effective vaccine. In South America, the virus is maintained through a jungle transmission cycle involving Haemagogus and Sabethes mosquitoes and non-human primates, which act as amplifying hosts and key epidemiological sentinels. Yellow fever epizootics are expanding geographically and are closely linked to environmental change and human-ecosystem interactions. Strengthening integrated, multidisciplinary surveillance systems is essential to improve early detection, guide vaccination strategies, and prevent human outbreaks [14].

Understanding primate behavioral ecology contributes to disease surveillance by identifying which species are most likely to come into contact with vectors and how habitat fragmentation alters transmission dynamics.

Human-Wildlife Conflict

Human behaviors driving disease emergence include interactions between humans, animals, and the environment that facilitate zoonotic spillover. Human adaptive strategies to resource acquisition shape predictable patterns of high-risk human-animal interactions, and humans construct ecological processes that facilitate spillover. Contemporary patterns of epidemiological risk are emergent properties of interactions between human foraging ecology and niche construction [8].

For primate conservation, this framework highlights the importance of understanding how human land use changes primate behavior and ecology. Managing free-ranging dogs in areas where they overlap with wildlife populations represents one concrete intervention informed by behavioral ecological research [11].

Common Failure Patterns in Primate Behavioral Ecology Research

Confounding Phylogeny and Ecology

A common failure in socioecological research is attributing behavioral differences to ecological factors when they actually reflect phylogenetic inheritance. Closely related species share many traits because of common ancestry, and comparing species without controlling for phylogeny can produce spurious correlations.

Researchers address this problem through phylogenetic comparative methods that account for evolutionary relationships. These methods require accurate phylogenies and careful attention to statistical assumptions.

Inadequate Temporal Sampling

Primate behavior varies seasonally and across years. Studies that sample only one season or a single year may miss important behavioral variation and produce misleading conclusions. Long-term studies spanning multiple years and seasons provide the most reliable data on behavioral ecology.

Researchers should also consider inter-annual variation in food availability, which can be substantial in seasonal environments. Studies that capture this variation provide more robust tests of socioecological predictions.

Observer Effects and Habituation

The presence of observers can alter primate behavior, particularly during early stages of habituation. Researchers must invest sufficient time in habituation before collecting systematic data and should monitor for observer effects throughout the study.

Experimental manipulations can also produce unintended behavioral changes. Researchers should pilot experiments carefully and include appropriate control conditions.

Records and Measurements in Primate Behavioral Ecology

Behavioral Data Collection

Standard behavioral measures include activity budgets, social interaction rates, proximity indices, and feeding rates. Researchers record these measures using standardized protocols that allow comparison across studies and sites.

Activity budgets quantify the proportion of time spent in different behaviors, including feeding, traveling, resting, and socializing. These budgets reflect ecological conditions and social organization.

Ecological Measurements

Ecological data collection includes phenological monitoring of food trees, quantification of food availability, and measurement of habitat structure. Researchers combine these data with behavioral observations to test predictions about how ecological conditions shape behavior.

Nutritional analysis of food items provides data on energy content, protein, fiber, and secondary compounds. These data allow researchers to assess diet quality and test hypotheses about nutritional constraints.

Long-Term Monitoring

Long-term monitoring programs track demographic parameters including group size, birth rates, mortality, and migration. These data provide the demographic context for interpreting behavioral observations and testing evolutionary hypotheses.

Population monitoring also contributes to conservation by identifying trends that may require management intervention.

Professional Escalation Criteria

Researchers and conservation practitioners should escalate concerns to appropriate authorities when they observe:

• Evidence of disease outbreaks in primate populations, particularly yellow fever or other zoonotic diseases with public health implications. Immediate notification of wildlife health authorities is essential because non-human primates act as epidemiological sentinels for yellow fever [14].
• Significant population declines or evidence of illegal hunting or trade. These situations require coordination with wildlife enforcement agencies.
• Emerging human-wildlife conflict situations, such as crop raiding or attacks on domestic animals, that may escalate. Early intervention can prevent harm to both primates and humans.
• Habitat destruction or fragmentation that threatens primate populations. Conservation organizations and government agencies should be notified to facilitate protection measures.

Limitations and Open Questions

Generalizability of Socioecological Models

Socioecological models explain a substantial portion of variation in primate social systems, but exceptions remain. Some species do not conform to predictions based on food distribution or predation risk, suggesting that additional factors such as demographic history, interspecific competition, or cultural transmission play important roles.

Researchers continue to refine socioecological models to account for these exceptions and to incorporate new data from understudied species and habitats.

The Role of Individual Variation

Behavioral ecology has traditionally focused on species-typical patterns, but individual variation within populations is substantial. Some individuals are more exploratory, more social, or more innovative than others, and this variation can have fitness consequences.

Understanding individual variation requires longitudinal data and quantitative genetic approaches. This research is essential for understanding the evolutionary potential of primate populations facing environmental change.

Integrating Multiple Levels of Analysis

Primate behavioral ecology spans multiple levels of analysis, from genes and neurobiology to individuals, groups, and ecosystems. Integrating these levels remains a major challenge and opportunity for the field.

Recent advances in genomics, neuroimaging, and remote sensing provide new tools for integration. These approaches promise to deepen understanding of how ecological conditions shape primate behavior and evolution.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is primate socioecology?

Primate socioecology is the study of how ecological factors, particularly food distribution and predation risk, shape primate social systems. The framework predicts that resource characteristics influence group size, female bonding, dominance relationships, and mating strategies. Researchers test these predictions through comparative studies across species and populations.

How does food distribution affect primate social organization?

When food occurs in clumped, defensible patches, females benefit from forming coalitions to defend resources, leading to larger groups with dominance hierarchies. When food is dispersed or unpredictable, females may forage alone or in small groups with weaker social bonds. These patterns have been documented across multiple primate lineages.

What role does predation risk play in primate group living?

Predation risk favors larger groups because group living provides dilution effects and increased vigilance. Predators also influence spatial organization within groups, with individuals adjusting their proximity to group members in response to predator presence. Research on howler monkeys exposed to domestic dogs demonstrates these context-dependent effects on spatial organization [11].

How does feeding ecology relate to brain evolution?

The Ecological Brain hypothesis proposes that feeding ecology drove brain expansion to support cognitive skills needed for foraging. Research on the ventromedial prefrontal cortex found that its volume relates more strongly to feeding ecology than to group size, supporting the importance of dietary quality and foraging complexity in brain evolution [18].

What is dietary plasticity in primates?

Dietary plasticity refers to the ability of primates to adjust their feeding behavior in response to changes in food availability. Species with broad dietary spectra can switch between different food types seasonally, buffering them against food scarcity. This flexibility allows primates to occupy seasonal and unpredictable habitats.

How do researchers study primate behavior in the wild?

Researchers use focal animal sampling, scan sampling, and all-occurrence recording to quantify behavior systematically. Experimental approaches include playback experiments and food manipulations. Recent technological advances include multi-animal tracking systems that use deep learning to detect and track primates in video recordings [15].

Why do some despotic primate societies show high cooperation?

The interdependency hypothesis proposes that dyadic interdependence, including friendships and coalitions, selectively enhances tolerance and fosters discriminate cooperation in despotic species. Research on six macaque species found high dyadic cooperation in despotic societies, but this cooperation is restricted to a few partners with stable bonds [13].

How does primate behavioral ecology inform conservation?

Understanding how ecological conditions shape primate behavior helps predict how species will respond to habitat change, climate change, and human disturbance. This knowledge informs conservation planning, including the management of protected areas, the design of corridors, and the mitigation of human-wildlife conflict. Disease ecology research highlights the importance of primates as sentinels for zoonotic diseases such as yellow fever [14].

Related Articles

• Hydrolyzed Protein: What It Means in Biology, Food, and Laboratory Use
• Hydrolyzed Protein: What It Means in Biology, Food, and Laboratory Use
• Hydrolyzed Protein: What It Means in Biology, Food, and Laboratory Use
• Evolution Of Genome
• Evolution Of Genome

References and Further Reading

• NCBI Literature Resources. National Center for Biotechnology Information.
• PubMed. National Library of Medicine.
• Patrícia Izar.. Current biology : CB, 2026.
• Hadza Landscape Burning.. Human nature (Hawthorne, N.Y.), 2024.
• Mouse lemurs.. Nature methods, 2025.
• Human behavioral ecology and niche construction.. Evolutionary anthropology, 2021.
• Enriching behavioral ecology with reinforcement learning methods.. Behavioural processes, 2019.
• Human behaviors driving disease emergence.. Evolutionary anthropology, 2024.
• Applying evolutionary anthropology.. Evolutionary anthropology, 2015.
• Primate social behavior.. American journal of physical anthropology, 2018.
• Spatial organization of mantled howler monkeys in relation to dog disturbance.. 2026.
• Sequence-level vocal convergence in common marmosets. 2026.
• Despotism promotes dyadic cooperation through enhanced interdependencies in non-human primate societies.. 2026.
• Revisiting the Status of Yellow Fever Epizootics and Its Surveillance in South America: New Non-Human Primates, Spillover and Ecological Drivers.. 2026.
• PriMAT: Robust multi-animal tracking of primates in the wild.. 2026.
• Feeding rate as valuable information in primate feeding ecology. Primates, 2009.
• Primate feeding ecology: An integrative approach. 2006.
• Refining the ecological brain: Strong relation between the ventromedial prefrontal cortex and feeding ecology in five primate species.. Cortex, a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior, 2019.
• Multiproxy approach to reconstruct fossil primate feeding behavior: Case study for macaque from the Plio-Pleistocene site Guefaït-4.2 (eastern Morocco). Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 2023.
• The feeding ecology and dietary overlap in two sympatric primate species, the long-tailed macaque (Macaca fascicularis) and dusky langur (Trachypithecus obscurus obscurus), in Malaysia. Primates, 2018.
• Primate behavioral ecology: Fifth edition. Primate Behavioral Ecology Fifth Edition, 2016.
• Primate Behavioral Ecology. Primate Behavioral Ecology, 2021.
• Modelling primate behavioral ecology. International Journal of Primatology, 2002.

This article is educational and does not replace institutional policy, professional advice, or applicable safety and regulatory requirements.